-
Tunable diode laser absorption spectroscopy (TDLAS) is a widely used technology for measuring absorption spectrum. However, the measurement efficiency of TDLAS is greatly limited by the narrow tuning range of conventional tunable laser diode. Exploiting a wideband, narrow linewidth tuning laser source, hyperspectral absorption spectroscopy possesses the ability to provide the overall absorption information over a continuous waveband in a single scan, which would significantly improve the data volume and diagnostic capability of TDLAS. With profound and strong absorption lines of water and carbon dioxide, the 2 μm waveband is an ideal candidate for water and carbon dioxide related absorption spectrum. An absorption line recognition threshold of 0.07 nm is derived for the absorption spectrum measurement of water around 2 μm through theoretical analysis. Utilizing the wideband emission spectrum of Tm-doped fiber, a wideband tunable, narrow linewidth fiber laser operating at 2 μm is built by combining a tunable FP filter with a fiber saturable absorber. The tunable FP filter is responsible for the wavelength control of the laser system, with which a 60 nm wideband tuning range from 1840 nm to 1900 nm is achieved. With a section of Tm-Ho codoped fiber as the fiber saturable absorber which is used for linewidth compression, a static linewidth of 0.05 nm is attained. This wideband tunable, narrow linewidth fiber laser is tested for the hyperspectral absorption spectrum measurement of water around 2 μm. Drived with a 0–10 V triangle wave at a repetition rate of 50 Hz, the output spectrum of the laser spans over a wavelength range of about 30 nm from 1856 nm to 1886 nm. The laser beam propagates about 50 cm through an open air, and then enters into the detectors for direct measurement. The 35 absorption lines of water are recognized after processing the data. Within the 1870–1880 nm range, comparisons with the theoretical absorption spectra at different laser linewidths, derived from the HITRAN2012 absorption database, show that the measured data cannot effectively distinguish two absorption lines adjacent to the strong absorption line at 1873 nm and 1877 nm. And, the measured results can be best fitted to a laser linewidth of about 0.08 nm, demonstrating that in the dynamic scanning process, the linewidth of the laser is expanded beyond the absorption line recognition threshold. Thus, when operating in a fast wideband scanning mode, the laser system should further compress its linewidth.
-
Keywords:
- tunable diode laser absorption spectroscopy /
- fiber saturable absorber /
- linewidth compression /
- hyperspectral absorption
[1] Goldenstein C S, Spearrin R M, Jeffries J B, Hanson R K 2017 Prog. Energ. Combust. Sci. 60 132
[2] Bolshov M A, Kuritsyn Y A, Romanovskii Y V 2015 Spectrochim. Acta B 106 45Google Scholar
[3] 丁武文, 孙利群, 衣路英 2017 66 100702Google Scholar
Ding W W, Sun L Q, Yi L Y 2017 Acta Phys. Sin. 66 100702Google Scholar
[4] Wu Q, Wang F, Li M, Yan J 2017 Combust. Sci. Technol. 189 1571Google Scholar
[5] Sur R, Sun K, Jeffries J B, Socha J G, Hanson R K 2015 Fuel 150 102Google Scholar
[6] Tao B, Hu Z Y, Fan W, Wang S, Ye J F, Zhang Z R 2017 Opt. Express 25 A762Google Scholar
[7] Witzel O, Klein A, Wagner S, Meffert C, Schulz C, Ebert V 2012 Appl. Phys. B 109 521Google Scholar
[8] Wang F, Wu Q, Huang Q, Zhang H, Yan J, Cen K 2015 Opt. Commun. 346 53Google Scholar
[9] Kranendonk L A, Caswell A W, Hagen C L, Neuroth C T, Shouse D T, Gord J R, Sanders S T 2009 J. Propul. Power 25 859Google Scholar
[10] Ma L, Cai W, Caswell A W, Kraetschmer T, Sanders S T, Roy S, Gord J R 2009 Opt. Express 17 8602Google Scholar
[11] Rothman L S, Gordon I E, Babikov Y, Barbe A, Chris Benner D, Bernath P F, Birk M, Bizzocchi L, Boudon V, Brown L R, Campargue A, Chance K, Cohen E A, Coudert L H, Devi V M, Drouin B J, Fayt A, Flaud J M, Gamache R R, Harrison J J, Hartmann J M, Hill C, Hodges J T, Jacquemart D, Jolly A, Lamouroux J, Le Roy R J, Li G, Long D A, Lyulin O M, Mackie C J, Massie S T, Mikhailenko S, Müller H S P, Naumenko O V, Nikitin A V, Orphal J, Perevalov V, Perrin A, Polovt-seva E R, Richard C, Smith M A H, Starikova E, Sung K, Tashkun S, Tennyson J, Toon G C, Tyuterev V G, Wagner G 2013 J. Quant. Spectrosc. Ra. 130 4Google Scholar
[12] 聂伟, 阚瑞峰, 许振宇, 姚路, 夏晖晖, 彭于权, 张步强, 何亚柏 2017 66 204204Google Scholar
Nie W, Kan R F, Xu Z Y, Yao L, Xia H H, Peng Y Q, Zhang B Q, He Y B 2017 Acta Phys. Sin. 66 204204Google Scholar
[13] Refaat T F, Singh U N, Yu J, Petros M, Ismail S, Kavaya M J, Davis K J 2015 Appl. Opt. 54 1387Google Scholar
[14] Gibert F, Flamant P H, Bruneau D, Loth C 2006 Appl. Opt. 45 4448Google Scholar
[15] Jackson S D, King T A 1999 J. Lightwave Technol. 17 948Google Scholar
[16] Jackson S D 2006 IEEE Photon. Technol. Lett. 18 1885Google Scholar
[17] Jackson S D 2009 Laser Photon. Rev. 3 466Google Scholar
[18] Stark A, Correia L, Teichmann M, Salewski S, Larsen C, Baev V M, Toschek P E 2003 Opt. Commun. 215 113Google Scholar
[19] Young R J De, Barnes N P 2010 Appl. Opt. 49 562Google Scholar
[20] Bremer K, Pal A, Yao S, Lewis E Sen R, Sun T, Grattan K T V 2013 Appl. Opt. 52 3957Google Scholar
[21] 陶蒙蒙, 陶波, 余婷, 王振宝, 冯国斌, 叶锡生 2016 红外与激光工程 45 1205002Google Scholar
Tao M M, Tao B, Yu T, Wang Z B, Feng G B, Ye X S 2016 Infrar. Laser Eng. 45 1205002Google Scholar
[22] Tao M M, Feng G B, Yu T, Ye X S, Wang Z B, Shen Y L, Zhao J 2018 Opt. Laser Technol. 100 176Google Scholar
[23] Tao M M, Yu T, Chen H W, Shen Y L, Ye X S, Zhao J 2018 Laser Phys. 28 115108Google Scholar
-
图 3 基于光纤可饱和吸收体的激光器线宽压缩光路设计(WDM, 反射式波分复用器; OC, 输出耦合器; ISO, 光纤隔离器; FSA, 光纤可饱和吸收体; FP filter, 法布里-珀罗滤波器)
Figure 3. Linewidth compression design of laser based on fiber saturable absorber (WDM, wavelength division multiplexer; OC, output coupler; ISO, isolator; FSA, fiber saturable absorber; FP filter, Fabry Perot filter).
-
[1] Goldenstein C S, Spearrin R M, Jeffries J B, Hanson R K 2017 Prog. Energ. Combust. Sci. 60 132
[2] Bolshov M A, Kuritsyn Y A, Romanovskii Y V 2015 Spectrochim. Acta B 106 45Google Scholar
[3] 丁武文, 孙利群, 衣路英 2017 66 100702Google Scholar
Ding W W, Sun L Q, Yi L Y 2017 Acta Phys. Sin. 66 100702Google Scholar
[4] Wu Q, Wang F, Li M, Yan J 2017 Combust. Sci. Technol. 189 1571Google Scholar
[5] Sur R, Sun K, Jeffries J B, Socha J G, Hanson R K 2015 Fuel 150 102Google Scholar
[6] Tao B, Hu Z Y, Fan W, Wang S, Ye J F, Zhang Z R 2017 Opt. Express 25 A762Google Scholar
[7] Witzel O, Klein A, Wagner S, Meffert C, Schulz C, Ebert V 2012 Appl. Phys. B 109 521Google Scholar
[8] Wang F, Wu Q, Huang Q, Zhang H, Yan J, Cen K 2015 Opt. Commun. 346 53Google Scholar
[9] Kranendonk L A, Caswell A W, Hagen C L, Neuroth C T, Shouse D T, Gord J R, Sanders S T 2009 J. Propul. Power 25 859Google Scholar
[10] Ma L, Cai W, Caswell A W, Kraetschmer T, Sanders S T, Roy S, Gord J R 2009 Opt. Express 17 8602Google Scholar
[11] Rothman L S, Gordon I E, Babikov Y, Barbe A, Chris Benner D, Bernath P F, Birk M, Bizzocchi L, Boudon V, Brown L R, Campargue A, Chance K, Cohen E A, Coudert L H, Devi V M, Drouin B J, Fayt A, Flaud J M, Gamache R R, Harrison J J, Hartmann J M, Hill C, Hodges J T, Jacquemart D, Jolly A, Lamouroux J, Le Roy R J, Li G, Long D A, Lyulin O M, Mackie C J, Massie S T, Mikhailenko S, Müller H S P, Naumenko O V, Nikitin A V, Orphal J, Perevalov V, Perrin A, Polovt-seva E R, Richard C, Smith M A H, Starikova E, Sung K, Tashkun S, Tennyson J, Toon G C, Tyuterev V G, Wagner G 2013 J. Quant. Spectrosc. Ra. 130 4Google Scholar
[12] 聂伟, 阚瑞峰, 许振宇, 姚路, 夏晖晖, 彭于权, 张步强, 何亚柏 2017 66 204204Google Scholar
Nie W, Kan R F, Xu Z Y, Yao L, Xia H H, Peng Y Q, Zhang B Q, He Y B 2017 Acta Phys. Sin. 66 204204Google Scholar
[13] Refaat T F, Singh U N, Yu J, Petros M, Ismail S, Kavaya M J, Davis K J 2015 Appl. Opt. 54 1387Google Scholar
[14] Gibert F, Flamant P H, Bruneau D, Loth C 2006 Appl. Opt. 45 4448Google Scholar
[15] Jackson S D, King T A 1999 J. Lightwave Technol. 17 948Google Scholar
[16] Jackson S D 2006 IEEE Photon. Technol. Lett. 18 1885Google Scholar
[17] Jackson S D 2009 Laser Photon. Rev. 3 466Google Scholar
[18] Stark A, Correia L, Teichmann M, Salewski S, Larsen C, Baev V M, Toschek P E 2003 Opt. Commun. 215 113Google Scholar
[19] Young R J De, Barnes N P 2010 Appl. Opt. 49 562Google Scholar
[20] Bremer K, Pal A, Yao S, Lewis E Sen R, Sun T, Grattan K T V 2013 Appl. Opt. 52 3957Google Scholar
[21] 陶蒙蒙, 陶波, 余婷, 王振宝, 冯国斌, 叶锡生 2016 红外与激光工程 45 1205002Google Scholar
Tao M M, Tao B, Yu T, Wang Z B, Feng G B, Ye X S 2016 Infrar. Laser Eng. 45 1205002Google Scholar
[22] Tao M M, Feng G B, Yu T, Ye X S, Wang Z B, Shen Y L, Zhao J 2018 Opt. Laser Technol. 100 176Google Scholar
[23] Tao M M, Yu T, Chen H W, Shen Y L, Ye X S, Zhao J 2018 Laser Phys. 28 115108Google Scholar
Catalog
Metrics
- Abstract views: 11884
- PDF Downloads: 186
- Cited By: 0