-
The characteristics, the formations and loss mechanisms of different particles of hollow cathode discharge in oxygen at 266 Pa are investigated by using the fluid model. The model contains 11 kinds of particles and 48 reactions. Under this simulation condition, the negative glow regions corresponding to the surrounding cathodes overlap. The results show that there is a strong hollow cathode effect. The density distributions of different charged and active particles are calculated. The charged particle density is located mainly in the central region of the discharge cell. Electrons and O– are the main ingredients of negative charges in the discharge system, and their density peaks are 5.0 × 1011 cm–3 and 1.6 × 1011 cm–3, respectively and
${\rm{O}}_2^+ $ is a main composition of positive charge in the discharge system with a peak density of 6.5 × 1011 cm–3. Abundant active oxygen particles exist in the discharge system, and their density is much higher than those of other charged particles. According to the densities of active particles, their magnitudes are ranked in the small-to-large order as O, O2(a1Δg), O(1D) and O3. Furthermore, the generation and consumption mechanism of electrons, O– and${\rm{O}}_2^+ $ are calculated in detail, and the generation and consumption paths of different active oxygen particles are also given. The results show that there is a complex coupling process among these particles. Each reaction generates a certain number of particles and consumes other particles at the same time, resulting in a dynamic balance among these particles.-
Keywords:
- hollow cathode discharge /
- oxygen /
- fluid model /
- active particles /
- generation and consumption mechanism
[1] Nakagawa Y, Kawakita T, Uchida S, Tochikubo F 2020 J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 53 135201
Google Scholar
[2] Babu S K, Kelly S, Kechkar S, Swift P, Daniels S, Turner M M 2019 Plasma Sources Sci. Technol. 28 115008
Google Scholar
[3] Vagin N P, Ionin A A, Kochetov I V, Napartovich A P, Sinitsyn D V, Yuryshev N N 2017 Plasma Phys. Rep. 43 330
Google Scholar
[4] 陈维, 黄骏, 李辉, 吕国华, 王兴权, 张国权, 王鹏业, 杨思泽 2012 61 185203
Google Scholar
Chen W, Huang J, Li H, Lv G H, Wang X Q, Zhang G Q, Wang P Y, Yang S Z 2012 Acta Phys. Sin. 61 185203
Google Scholar
[5] 欧阳吉庭, 张晨阳, 张宇, 刘思含, 缪劲松 2020 北京理工大学学报 40 908
Google Scholar
Ouyang J T, Zhang C Y, Zhang Y, Liu S H, Miao J S 2020 J. B. Inst. Techno. 40 908
Google Scholar
[6] Bakeev I Y, Klimov A S, Oks E M, Zenin A A 2021 Vacuum 187 110161
[7] Hou X Y, Zou X B, Li Y T, Zhang L W, Wang X X 2019 High Volt. 4 217
Google Scholar
[8] Korolev Y D, Koval N N 2018 J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 51 323001
Google Scholar
[9] Boeuf J P, Pitchford L C 2005 Appl. Phys. Lett. 86 071501
Google Scholar
[10] Fu Y Y, Verboncoeur J P, Christlieb A J 2017 Phys. Plasmas 24 103514
Google Scholar
[11] Cong S Y, Wu R H, Mu L, Sun J Z, Wang D Z 2019 J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 52 045205
Google Scholar
[12] Jiang X X, He F, Chen Q, Ge T, Ouyang J T 2014 Phys. Plasmas 21 033508
Google Scholar
[13] 夏广庆, 薛伟华, 陈茂林, 朱雨, 朱国强 2011 60 015201
Google Scholar
Xia G Q, Xue W H, Chen M L, Zhu Y, Zhu G Q 2011 Acta Phys. Sin. 60 015201
Google Scholar
[14] Wei H C, Wang N, Duan Z C, He F 2018 Phys. Plasmas 25 123513
Google Scholar
[15] Hou X Y, Fu Y Y, Wang H, Zou X B, Luo H Y, Wang X X 2017 Phys. Plasmas 24 083506
Google Scholar
[16] 何寿杰, 张钊, 赵雪娜, 李庆 2017 66 055101
Google Scholar
He S J, Zhang Zhao, Zhao X N, Li Q 2017 Acta Phys. Sin. 66 055101
Google Scholar
[17] Lavrukevich Y, Ryabtsev A, Tsiolko V 2017 Probl. At. Sci. Technol. 107 215
[18] Bazhenov V Y, Matsevich S V, Piun V M, Tsiolko V V 2015 Probl. At. Sci. Technol. 98 177
[19] Yamatake A, Yasuoka K, Ishii S 2004 Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 43 6381
Google Scholar
[20] Qin Y, He F, Jiang X X, Xie K, Ouyang J T 2014 Phys. Plasmas 21 073501
Google Scholar
[21] Matsui M, Ikemoto T, Takayanagi H, Komurasaki K, Arakawa Y 2006 Vacuum 80 1161
Google Scholar
[22] He S J, Ha J, Liu S M, Ouyang J T 2013 Phys. Plasmas 20 123504
Google Scholar
[23] He J, Zhang Y T T 2012 Plasma Processes Polym. 9 919
Google Scholar
[24] Hsu C C, Nierode M A, Coburn J W, Graves D B 2006 J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 39 3272
Google Scholar
[25] Park G, Lee H, Kim G, Lee J K 2008 Plasma Processes Polym. 5 569
Google Scholar
[26] Sakiyama Y, Graves D B, Chang H W, Shimizu T, Morfill G E 2012 J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 45 425201
Google Scholar
[27] Baulch D L, Cox R A, Crutzen P J, Hampson R F, Kerr J A, Troe J, Watson R T 1982 J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data 11 327
Google Scholar
[28] Stafford D S, Kushner M J 2004 J. Appl. Phys. 96 2451
Google Scholar
[29] 冯静 2018 硕士学位论文 (大连: 大连理工大学)
Feng J 2018 M. S. Dissertation (Dalian: Dalian University of Technology) (in Chinese)
[30] Kossyi I A, Kostinsky A Y, Matveyev A A 1992 Plasma Sources Sci. Technol. 1 207
Google Scholar
[31] Yanallah K, Pontiga F, Fernández-Rueda A, Castellanos A, Belasri A 2008 J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 41 195206
Google Scholar
[32] Soria C, Pontiga F, Castellanos A 2004 Plasma Sources Sci. Technol. 13 95
Google Scholar
[33] Bogdanov E A, Kudryavtsev A A, Tsendin L D, Arslanbekov R R, Kolobov V I, Kudryavtsev V V 2003 Tech. Phys. 48 983
Google Scholar
[34] Xu J Z, Zhong P, Li J L, Lin J, Diao Y, Zhang J 2010 Plasma Sci. Technol. 12 601
Google Scholar
[35] Gaens W V, Bogaerts A 2013 J. Phys. D:Appl. Phys. 46 275201
[36] Lazzaroni C, Chabert P 2016 Plasma Sources Sci. Technol. 25 065015
Google Scholar
[37] Donkó Z 1998 Phys. Rev. E 57 7126
Google Scholar
[38] Wei L S, Peng B F, Li M, Zhang Y F 2016 Vacuum 125 123
Google Scholar
[39] Pan G S, Tan Z Y, Pan J, Wang X L, Shan C H 2016 Phys. Plasmas 23 043508
Google Scholar
[40] Duran-Olivencia F J, Pontiga F, Castellanos A 2014 J. Phys. D:Appl. Phys. 47 415203
Google Scholar
[41] Hagelaar G J, Hoog F J, Kroesen G M 2000 Phys. Rev. E 62 1452
Google Scholar
[42] Laca M, Morávek M J, Schmiedt, Luká, Hrachová V, Kaňka A 2017 Contrib. Plasma Phys. 57 336
Google Scholar
[43] 周志向 2020 硕士学位论文 (保定: 河北大学)
Zhou Z X 2020 M. S. Dissertation (Baoding: Hebei University) (in Chinese)
[44] Costin C, Minea T M, Popa G, Gousset G 2010 J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 28 322
Google Scholar
[45] Yang A J, Wang X H, Rong M Z, Liu D X, Iza F, Kong M G 2011 Phys. Plasmas 18 113503
[46] 洪布双, 苑涛, 邹帅, 唐中华, 徐东升, 虞一青, 王栩生, 辛煜 2013 62 115202
Google Scholar
Hong B S, Yuan T, Zou S, Tang Z H, Xu D S, Yu Y Q, Wang X S, Xin Y 2013 Acta Phys. Sin. 62 115202
Google Scholar
[47] 王晓龙, 谭震宇, 潘光胜, 单春虹 2018 高电压技术 44 904
Google Scholar
Wang X L, Tan Z Y, Pan G S, Shan C H 2018 High Volt. Engineer. 44 904
Google Scholar
-
图 1 圆柱形空心阴极放电单元截面图(虚线z = 5.5 mm)
Figure 1. Cross section of cylindrical hollow cathode discharge (dashed line z = 5.5 mm).
图 2 (a) 电势二维分布图; (b) z = 5.5 mm (图 (a) 虚线)处径向电场分布图
Figure 2. (a) Two dimensional potential distribution; (b) radial electric field distribution at z = 5.5 mm (dashed line in (a)).
图 3 二维空间粒子密度分布图 (a)电子; (b) O–; (c)
${\rm{O}}_2^+ $ Figure 3. Two dimensional particles density distribution: (a) Electron; (b) O–; (c)
${\rm{O}}_2^+ $ .
图 4 z = 5.5 mm时, 粒子密度径向分布图 (a) 带电粒子; (b) 活性氧粒子
Figure 4. Radial distribution of particle density when z = 5.5 mm: (a) Charged particles; (b) reactive oxygen species.
图 5 二维粒子密度分布图 (a) O; (b) O2 (a1Δg)
Figure 5. Two dimensional particles density distribution: (a) O; (b) O2 (a1Δg).
图 6 z = 5.5 mm处, 电负度
$ \alpha $ 径向分布图Figure 6. Radial distribution of electronegativity at z = 5.5 mm
图 7 z = 5.5 mm处, 电子(a)生成与(b)消耗反应速率的径向分布图
Figure 7. Radial distribution of reaction rates of (a) generation and (b) consumption of electronics at z = 5.5 mm.
图 8 z = 5.5 mm处, 平均电子能量和电子密度一维径向分布图
Figure 8. One dimensional radial distribution of average electron energy and electron density at z = 5.5 mm.
图 9 z = 5.5 mm处, O–离子(a)生成与(b)消耗反应速率的径向分布图
Figure 9. Radial distribution of reaction rates of (a) formation and (b) consumption of O– at z = 5.5 mm.
图 10 z = 5.5 mm处,
${\rm{O} }_2^+ $ 离子(a)生成与(b)消耗反应速率的径向分布图Figure 10. Radial distribution of reaction rates of (a) formation and (b) consumption of
${\rm{O} }_2^+ $ at z = 5.5 mm.
图 11 z = 5.5 mm处, 氧原子(a)生成与(b)消耗反应速率的径向分布图
Figure 11. Radial distribution of reaction rates of (a) formation and (b) consumption of oxygen atom O at z = 5.5 mm.
图 12 活性粒子生成、损耗路径概要图(实线箭头所指方向为生成粒子, 虚线箭头离开方向为损耗粒子)
Figure 12. Outline of active particle generation and consumption path (the direction indicated by the solid line arrow is the generated particle, and the direction left by the dotted line arrow is the loss particle).
表 1 放电反应类型
Table 1. Discharge reactions in the model.
反应标号 反应方程 反应标号 反应方程 G1 e + O2 → 2O + e[23] G25 O3 + O(1D) → O2 + 2O[26] G2 e + O2 → ${\rm{O}}_2^+ $ + 2e [23] G26 O3 + O(1D) → 2O2[26] G3 e + O– → O + 2e [23] G27 ${\rm{O}}_2^ + $ + O2 + O2 → ${\rm{O}}_4^+ $ + O2[29] G4 e + O2 →O + O(1D) + e[23] G28 ${\rm{O}}_4^+$ + O2 → ${\rm{O}}_2^ + $ + O2 + O2[30] G5 e + O → O(1D) + e[23] G29 ${\rm{O}}_4^ + $ + O → ${\rm{O}}_2^ + $ + O3[29] G6 e + O2(a1∆g) → 2O + e[24] G30 e + O(1D) → O + e[23] G7 e + O2 → O– + O[23] G31 O3 + O2 → 2O2 + O[25] G8 e + O3 → ${\rm{O}}_2^ -$ + O[23] G32 O– + O2(a1∆g) → O3 + e[23] G9 e + ${\rm{O} }_2^ +$ → 2O[25] G33 O– + O2(a1∆g) → ${\rm{O}}_2^ - $ + O[23] G10 O– + ${\rm{O} }_2^+$ → 3O[25] G34 O3 + O → O2(a1∆g) + O2 [31] G11 O– + O → e + O2[25] G35 O3 + O(1D) → O2(a1∆g) + O2[32] G12 O– + O2 → O3 + e[25] G36 O3 + O(1D) → 2O2(a1∆g) [32] G13 ${\rm{O}}_2^ + $ + ${\rm{O}}_2^ - $ → 2O2 [26] G37 ${\rm{O}}_4^ + $ + ${\rm{O}}_3^ - $ → 3O2 + O[33] G14 O3 + O → 2O2[25] G38 ${\rm{O}}_4^ + $ + O– → O2 + O3[33] G15 O3 + ${\rm{O}}_2^ - $→ ${\rm{O}}_3^ - $ + O2[26] G39 ${\rm{O}}_4^ + $ + O2(a1∆g) → ${\rm{O}}_2^ + $ + O2 + O2[29] G16 O– + O3 → ${\rm{O}}_3^ - $ + O[26] G40 e +${\rm{O}}_4^ + $ → O2 + O2[34] G17 ${\rm{O}}_3^ - $ + O → ${\rm{O}}_2^ - $ + O2[27] G41 ${\rm{O}}_4^ + $ + ${\rm{O}}_2^ - $→ 3O2[33] G18 ${\rm{O}}_3^ - $ + ${\rm{O}}_2^+ $ → O3 + 2O[28] G42 ${\rm{O}}_4^ + $ + O– → O + O2 + O2[35] G19 O2(a1∆g) + O2 → 2O2[25] G43 ${\rm{O}}_4^ + $ + ${\rm{O}}_2^ - $ → O + O + O2 + O2[35] G20 O2(a1∆g) + O → O + O2[25] G44 ${\rm{O}}_4^ + $ + ${\rm{O}}_3^ - $→ O3 + O2 + O2[35] G21 O(1D) + O → 2O[23] G45 ${\rm{O}}_2^ - $ + O → O– + O2[32] G22 O(1D) + O2 → O + O2[26] G46 O + O + O2 → O + O3[36] G23 O(1D) + O2 → O + O2(a1∆g)[26] G47 O + O2 + O2 → O2 + O3[36] G24 O3 + O2(a1∆g) → 2O2 + O[25] G48 O + O2 + O3 → O3 + O3[36] 
DownLoad: CSV
表 2 电子生成与消耗反应的相应贡献
Table 2. The ratio of electron generation and consumption for different reactions.
电子生成反应 贡献/% 电子消耗反应 贡献/% G2: e + O2 → ${\rm{O}}_2^+ $+ 2e 99.875 G7: e + O2 → O– + O 42.418 G11: O– + O → e + O2 0.114 G40: e + ${\rm{O}}_4^+ $→ O2 + O2 31.748 G12: O– + O2 → O3 + e 0.008 G9: e + ${\rm{O}}_2^+ $ → 2O 25.808 G32: O– + O2(a1∆g) → O3 + e 0.002 G8: e + O3 → ${\rm{O}}_2^- $ + O 0.026 G3: e + O– → O + 2e 7.0 × 10–4
DownLoad: CSV
表 3 O–生成与消耗反应的相应贡献
Table 3. Ratio of O–generation and consumption for different reactions.
O–生成反应 贡献/% O–消耗反应 贡献/% G7: e + O2 → O– + O 99.998 G10: O– +${\rm{O} }_2^+ $ → 3O 86.712 G45: ${\rm{O} }_2^- $ + O → O– + O2 0.002 G11: O– + O → e + O2 8.548 G38: ${\rm{O} }_4^+ $ + O– → O2 + O3 3.809 G12: O– + O2 → O3 + e 0.631 G32: O– + O2(a1∆g) → O3 + e 0.135 G42: ${\rm{O} }_4^+ $ + O– → O + O2 + O2 0.055 G3: e + O– → O + 2e 0.055 G33: O– + O2(a1∆g) → ${\rm{O} }_2^- $ + O 0.045 G16: O– + O3 → ${\rm{O} }_3^- $ + O 0.011
DownLoad: CSV
表 4
${\rm{O} }_2^+ $ 生成与消耗反应的相应贡献Table 4. The ratio of
${\rm{O} }_2^+ $ generation and consumption for different reactions.${\rm{O} }_2^+ $生成反应 贡献/% ${\rm{O} }_2^+ $消耗反应 贡献/% G2: e + O2 → ${\rm{O} }_2^+ $ + 2e 99.993 G27: ${\rm{O} }_2^+ $ + O2 + O2 → ${\rm{O} }_4^+ $ + O2 44.657 G28: ${\rm{O} }_4^+ $ + O2 → ${\rm{O} }_2^+ $ + O2 + O2 0.007 G9: e + ${\rm{O} }_2^+ $ → 2O 30.675 G29: ${\rm{O} }_4^+ $ + O → ${\rm{O} }_2^+ $ + O3 5.8×10–4 G10: O– + ${\rm{O} }_2^+ $ → 3O 24.634 G39: ${\rm{O} }_4^+ $ + O2(a1∆g)→${\rm{O} }_2^+ $ + O2 + O2 6.9×10–6 G13: ${\rm{O} }_2^+ $ + ${\rm{O} }_2^- $ → 2O2 0.032 G18: ${\rm{O} }_3^-$ +${\rm{O} }_2^+ $ → O3 + 2O 0.002
DownLoad: CSV
表 5 O生成与消耗反应的相应贡献
Table 5. Ratio of O generation and consumption for different reactions.
O生成反应 贡献/% O消耗反应 贡献/% G4: e + O2 → O + O(1D) + e 45.255 G5: e + O → O(1D) + e 56.855 G22: O(1D) + O2 → O + O2 39.217 G11: O– + O → e + O2 26.231 G1: e + O2 → 2O + e 8.725 G47: O2 + O2 + O → O2 + O3 16.765 G23:O(1D) + O2→O + O2(a1∆g) 5.602 G29: ${\rm{O} }_4^+ $ + O → ${\rm{O} }_2^+ $ + O3 0.135 G7: e + O2 → O– + O 0.567 G45: ${\rm{O} }_2^-$ + O→ O– + O2 0.012 G9: e +${\rm{O} }_2^+ $ → 2O 0.345 G46: O + O + O2 → O + O3 0.001 G10: O– + ${\rm{O} }_2^+ $ → 3O 0.277 G17: ${\rm{O} }_3^- $ + O → ${\rm{O} }_2^- $ + O2 7.7 × 10–4 其他 0.012 G14: O3 + O → 2O2 3.4 × 10–4 G34: O3 + O→O2(a1∆g) + O2 1.9 × 10–4 G48: O + O2 + O3 → O3 + O3 6.0 × 10–7
DownLoad: CSV
-
[1] Nakagawa Y, Kawakita T, Uchida S, Tochikubo F 2020 J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 53 135201
Google Scholar
[2] Babu S K, Kelly S, Kechkar S, Swift P, Daniels S, Turner M M 2019 Plasma Sources Sci. Technol. 28 115008
Google Scholar
[3] Vagin N P, Ionin A A, Kochetov I V, Napartovich A P, Sinitsyn D V, Yuryshev N N 2017 Plasma Phys. Rep. 43 330
Google Scholar
[4] 陈维, 黄骏, 李辉, 吕国华, 王兴权, 张国权, 王鹏业, 杨思泽 2012 61 185203
Google Scholar
Chen W, Huang J, Li H, Lv G H, Wang X Q, Zhang G Q, Wang P Y, Yang S Z 2012 Acta Phys. Sin. 61 185203
Google Scholar
[5] 欧阳吉庭, 张晨阳, 张宇, 刘思含, 缪劲松 2020 北京理工大学学报 40 908
Google Scholar
Ouyang J T, Zhang C Y, Zhang Y, Liu S H, Miao J S 2020 J. B. Inst. Techno. 40 908
Google Scholar
[6] Bakeev I Y, Klimov A S, Oks E M, Zenin A A 2021 Vacuum 187 110161
[7] Hou X Y, Zou X B, Li Y T, Zhang L W, Wang X X 2019 High Volt. 4 217
Google Scholar
[8] Korolev Y D, Koval N N 2018 J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 51 323001
Google Scholar
[9] Boeuf J P, Pitchford L C 2005 Appl. Phys. Lett. 86 071501
Google Scholar
[10] Fu Y Y, Verboncoeur J P, Christlieb A J 2017 Phys. Plasmas 24 103514
Google Scholar
[11] Cong S Y, Wu R H, Mu L, Sun J Z, Wang D Z 2019 J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 52 045205
Google Scholar
[12] Jiang X X, He F, Chen Q, Ge T, Ouyang J T 2014 Phys. Plasmas 21 033508
Google Scholar
[13] 夏广庆, 薛伟华, 陈茂林, 朱雨, 朱国强 2011 60 015201
Google Scholar
Xia G Q, Xue W H, Chen M L, Zhu Y, Zhu G Q 2011 Acta Phys. Sin. 60 015201
Google Scholar
[14] Wei H C, Wang N, Duan Z C, He F 2018 Phys. Plasmas 25 123513
Google Scholar
[15] Hou X Y, Fu Y Y, Wang H, Zou X B, Luo H Y, Wang X X 2017 Phys. Plasmas 24 083506
Google Scholar
[16] 何寿杰, 张钊, 赵雪娜, 李庆 2017 66 055101
Google Scholar
He S J, Zhang Zhao, Zhao X N, Li Q 2017 Acta Phys. Sin. 66 055101
Google Scholar
[17] Lavrukevich Y, Ryabtsev A, Tsiolko V 2017 Probl. At. Sci. Technol. 107 215
[18] Bazhenov V Y, Matsevich S V, Piun V M, Tsiolko V V 2015 Probl. At. Sci. Technol. 98 177
[19] Yamatake A, Yasuoka K, Ishii S 2004 Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 43 6381
Google Scholar
[20] Qin Y, He F, Jiang X X, Xie K, Ouyang J T 2014 Phys. Plasmas 21 073501
Google Scholar
[21] Matsui M, Ikemoto T, Takayanagi H, Komurasaki K, Arakawa Y 2006 Vacuum 80 1161
Google Scholar
[22] He S J, Ha J, Liu S M, Ouyang J T 2013 Phys. Plasmas 20 123504
Google Scholar
[23] He J, Zhang Y T T 2012 Plasma Processes Polym. 9 919
Google Scholar
[24] Hsu C C, Nierode M A, Coburn J W, Graves D B 2006 J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 39 3272
Google Scholar
[25] Park G, Lee H, Kim G, Lee J K 2008 Plasma Processes Polym. 5 569
Google Scholar
[26] Sakiyama Y, Graves D B, Chang H W, Shimizu T, Morfill G E 2012 J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 45 425201
Google Scholar
[27] Baulch D L, Cox R A, Crutzen P J, Hampson R F, Kerr J A, Troe J, Watson R T 1982 J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data 11 327
Google Scholar
[28] Stafford D S, Kushner M J 2004 J. Appl. Phys. 96 2451
Google Scholar
[29] 冯静 2018 硕士学位论文 (大连: 大连理工大学)
Feng J 2018 M. S. Dissertation (Dalian: Dalian University of Technology) (in Chinese)
[30] Kossyi I A, Kostinsky A Y, Matveyev A A 1992 Plasma Sources Sci. Technol. 1 207
Google Scholar
[31] Yanallah K, Pontiga F, Fernández-Rueda A, Castellanos A, Belasri A 2008 J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 41 195206
Google Scholar
[32] Soria C, Pontiga F, Castellanos A 2004 Plasma Sources Sci. Technol. 13 95
Google Scholar
[33] Bogdanov E A, Kudryavtsev A A, Tsendin L D, Arslanbekov R R, Kolobov V I, Kudryavtsev V V 2003 Tech. Phys. 48 983
Google Scholar
[34] Xu J Z, Zhong P, Li J L, Lin J, Diao Y, Zhang J 2010 Plasma Sci. Technol. 12 601
Google Scholar
[35] Gaens W V, Bogaerts A 2013 J. Phys. D:Appl. Phys. 46 275201
[36] Lazzaroni C, Chabert P 2016 Plasma Sources Sci. Technol. 25 065015
Google Scholar
[37] Donkó Z 1998 Phys. Rev. E 57 7126
Google Scholar
[38] Wei L S, Peng B F, Li M, Zhang Y F 2016 Vacuum 125 123
Google Scholar
[39] Pan G S, Tan Z Y, Pan J, Wang X L, Shan C H 2016 Phys. Plasmas 23 043508
Google Scholar
[40] Duran-Olivencia F J, Pontiga F, Castellanos A 2014 J. Phys. D:Appl. Phys. 47 415203
Google Scholar
[41] Hagelaar G J, Hoog F J, Kroesen G M 2000 Phys. Rev. E 62 1452
Google Scholar
[42] Laca M, Morávek M J, Schmiedt, Luká, Hrachová V, Kaňka A 2017 Contrib. Plasma Phys. 57 336
Google Scholar
[43] 周志向 2020 硕士学位论文 (保定: 河北大学)
Zhou Z X 2020 M. S. Dissertation (Baoding: Hebei University) (in Chinese)
[44] Costin C, Minea T M, Popa G, Gousset G 2010 J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 28 322
Google Scholar
[45] Yang A J, Wang X H, Rong M Z, Liu D X, Iza F, Kong M G 2011 Phys. Plasmas 18 113503
[46] 洪布双, 苑涛, 邹帅, 唐中华, 徐东升, 虞一青, 王栩生, 辛煜 2013 62 115202
Google Scholar
Hong B S, Yuan T, Zou S, Tang Z H, Xu D S, Yu Y Q, Wang X S, Xin Y 2013 Acta Phys. Sin. 62 115202
Google Scholar
[47] 王晓龙, 谭震宇, 潘光胜, 单春虹 2018 高电压技术 44 904
Google Scholar
Wang X L, Tan Z Y, Pan G S, Shan C H 2018 High Volt. Engineer. 44 904
Google Scholar
DownLoad:
Catalog
Metrics
- Abstract views: 4996
- PDF Downloads: 74
- Cited By: 0
