Search

Article

x

留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

Cascade overlap simulation of formation of dislocation loops in Ti-V-Ta multi-principal element alloy

Zhao Yong-Peng Dou Yan-Kun He Xin-Fu Yang Wen

Citation:

Cascade overlap simulation of formation of dislocation loops in Ti-V-Ta multi-principal element alloy

Zhao Yong-Peng, Dou Yan-Kun, He Xin-Fu, Yang Wen
cstr: 32037.14.aps.73.20241074
PDF
HTML
Get Citation
  • Among the currently developed multi-principal element alloys (MPEAs), Ti-V-Ta MPEA stands out because of its good high-temperature strength, good room-temperature plasticity, stable organizational structure, and low neutron activation, and becomes a first option for cladding material of special power reactors. The radiation resistance of Ti-V-Ta MPEA is the focus of current research. Dislocation loops are the main irradiation defects in Ti-V-Ta MPEA, which can significantly affect the mechanical properties. Therefore, clarifying the formation mechanism of dislocation loops in Ti-V-Ta HEA can help to understand its radiation resistance. The formation behavior of dislocation loops in Ti-V-Ta MPEA is studied based on molecular dynamics method in this work. Cascade overlap simulations with vacancy clusters and interstitial clusters are carried out. The cascade overlap formation mechanism of dislocation loops is analyzed and discussed. In Ti-V-Ta MPEA, the cascade overlap with defect clusters can directly produce different types of dislocation structures. The defect configuration after cascade overlap is determined by the primary knock-on atom (PKA) energy and the type and size of the preset defect clusters. Cascade overlap can improve the formation probability of $ \left\langle {100} \right\rangle $ dislocation loops in Ti-V-Ta MPEA. Cascade overlap with vacancy clusters is an important mechanism for the formation of $ \left\langle {100} \right\rangle $ vacancy dislocation loops, and the size of vacancy clusters is the dominant factor for the formation of $ \left\langle {100} \right\rangle $ vacancy dislocation loops. When the PKA energy is enough to dissolve the defect clusters, $ \left\langle {100} \right\rangle $ vacancy dislocation loops are more likely to form. Furthermore, cascade overlap with interstitial clusters in Ti-V-Ta MPEA is a possible mechanism for the formation of $ \left\langle {100} \right\rangle $ interstitial dislocation loops. This study can contribute to understanding the evolution behavior of irradiation defects in Ti-V-Ta MPEA, and provide theoretical support for designing the composition and optimizing the high-entropy alloys.
      Corresponding author: Dou Yan-Kun, douyankun3@163.com
    • Funds: Project supported by the National Youth Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 12405324), the Dean’s Fund of China Institute of Atomic Energy (Grant No. 219256), and the Director’s Fund of China Institute of Atomic Energy (Grant No. 218296).
    [1]

    El-Genk M S, Tournier J M 2005 J. Nucl. Mater. 340 93Google Scholar

    [2]

    Busby J T, Leonard K J 2007 JOM 59 20

    [3]

    Yeh J W, Chen S K, Lin S J, Gan J Y, Chin T S, Shun T T, Tsau C H, Chang S Y 2004 Adv. Eng. Mater. 6 299Google Scholar

    [4]

    Tsai M H, Yeh J W 2014 Mater. Res. Lett. 2 107Google Scholar

    [5]

    Ye Y F, Wang Q, Lu J, Liu C T, Yang Y 2016 Mater. Today 19 349Google Scholar

    [6]

    Miracle D B, Senkov O N 2017 Acta Mater. 122 448Google Scholar

    [7]

    George E P, Raabe D, Ritchie R O 2019 Nat. Rev. Mater. 4 515Google Scholar

    [8]

    Pickering E J, Carruthers A W, Barron P J, Middleburgh S C, Armstrong D E J, Gandy A S 2021 Entropy 23 98Google Scholar

    [9]

    Jia N N, Li Y K, Liu X, Zheng Y, Wang B P, Wang J S, Xue Y F, Jin K 2019 JOM. 71 3490Google Scholar

    [10]

    Hu B, Yao B, Wang J, Liu Y, Wang C J, Du Y, Yin H Q 2020 Intermetallics 118 106701Google Scholar

    [11]

    Yin X, Dou Y K, He X F, Jin K, Wang C L, Dong Y G, Wang H R, Zhong W H, Xue Y F, Yang W 2022 JOM 74 4326Google Scholar

    [12]

    Jia N N, Li Y, Huang H F, Chen S, Li D, Dou Y K, He X F, Yang W, Yin X, Jin K 2021 J. Nucl. Mater. 550 152937Google Scholar

    [13]

    Mei L, Zhang Q H, Dou Y K, Fu E G, Li L, Chen S, Dong Y G, Guo X, He X F, Yang W, Yin X, Jin K 2023 Scr. Mater. 223 115070Google Scholar

    [14]

    Dou Y K, Zhao Y P, He X F, Gao J, Cao J L, Yang W 2023 J. Nucl. Mater. 573 154096Google Scholar

    [15]

    Zhao Y P, Dou Y K, He X F, Deng H Q, Wang L F, Yang W 2023 Comput. Mater. Sci. 218 111943Google Scholar

    [16]

    Zhao Y P, Dou Y K, He X F, Cao H, Wang L F, Deng H Q, Yang W 2024 Chin. Phys. B 33 036104Google Scholar

    [17]

    Peng Q, Meng F J, Yang Y Z, Lu C Y, Deng H Q, Wang L M, De S, Gao F 2018 Nat. Commun. 9 4880Google Scholar

    [18]

    Granberg F, Byggmästar J, Sand A E, Nordlund K 2017 Europhys. Lett. 119 56003Google Scholar

    [19]

    Byggmästar J, Granberg F, Sand A E, Pirttikoski A, Alexander R, Marinica M C, Nordlund K 2019 J. Phys. Condens. Matter. 31 245402Google Scholar

    [20]

    Wang X Y, Gao N, Wang Y N, Liu H L, Shu G G, Li C L, Xu B, Liu W 2019 J. Nucl. Mater. 519 322Google Scholar

    [21]

    Marinica M C, Willaime F, Crocombette J P 2012 Phys. Rev. Lett. 108 025501Google Scholar

    [22]

    Gao J, Gaganidze E, Kaiser B, Aktaa J 2021 J. Nucl. Mater. 557 153212Google Scholar

    [23]

    Esfandiarpour A, Byggmästar J, Balbuena J P, Caturla M J, Nordlund K, Granberg F 2022 Materialia. 21 101344Google Scholar

    [24]

    Arakawa K, Hatanaka M, Kuramoto E, Ono K, Mori H 2006 Phys. Rev. Lett. 96 125506Google Scholar

    [25]

    Chen J, Gao N, Jung P, Sauvage T 2013 J. Nucl. Mater. 441 216Google Scholar

    [26]

    Gao N, Chen J, Kurtz R J, Wang Z G, Zhang R F, Gao F 2017 J. Phys. Condens. Matter. 29 455301Google Scholar

    [27]

    Xu H, Stoller R E, Osetsky Y N, Terentyev D 2013 Phys. Rev. Lett. 110 265503Google Scholar

    [28]

    Wang X Y, Gao N, Wang Y N, Wu X Y, Shu G G, Li C L, Li Q L, Xu B, Liu W 2019 Scr. Mater. 162 204Google Scholar

    [29]

    Plimpton S 1995 J. Comput. Phys. 117 1Google Scholar

    [30]

    Qiu R Y, Chen Y C, Liao X C, He X F, Yang W, Hu W Y, Deng H Q 2021 J. Nucl. Mater. 557 153231Google Scholar

    [31]

    Stukowski A 2010 Model. Simul. Mater. Sc. 18 015012Google Scholar

    [32]

    Fellman A, Sand A E 2022 J. Nucl. Mater. 572 154020Google Scholar

    [33]

    Fellman A, Sand A E, Byggmästar J, Nordlund K 2019 J. Phys. Condens. Matter. 31 405402Google Scholar

    [34]

    Qiu R Y, Chen Y C, Gao N, He X F, Dou Y K, Yang W, Hu W Y, Deng H Q 2023 Nucl. Mater. Energy 34 101394Google Scholar

  • 图 1  Ti-V-Ta多主元合金与空位团簇级联重叠模拟的缺陷演化过程(40 keV, $ {N}_{{\mathrm{V}}{\mathrm{A}}{\mathrm{C}}} = 253$), 红色和蓝色为间隙原子和空位

    Figure 1.  Defect evolution process during the cascade overlap simulation with vacancy cluster (40 keV, $ {N}_{{\mathrm{V}}{\mathrm{A}}{\mathrm{C}}}= 253 $) in Ti-V-Ta multi-principal element alloy, red and blue are interstitials and vacancies.

    图 2  Ti-V-Ta多主元合金与空位团簇级联重叠形成的典型缺陷构型(40 keV, $ {N}_{{\mathrm{V}}{\mathrm{A}}{\mathrm{C}}} $= 253), 红色和蓝色为间隙原子和空位, 粉线和绿线为$ \left\langle {100} \right\rangle $和1/2$ \left\langle {111} \right\rangle $位错线

    Figure 2.  Typical defect configuration during the cascade overlap simulation with vacancy cluster (40 keV, $ {N}_{{\mathrm{V}}{\mathrm{A}}{\mathrm{C}}} $= 253) in Ti-V-Ta multi-principal element alloy, red and blue are interstitials and vacancies, pink and green lines are $ \left\langle {100} \right\rangle $ and 1/2$ \left\langle {111} \right\rangle $ dislocation lines.

    图 3  新产生的Frenkel缺陷对数目与预置空位团簇尺寸和PKA能量的关系

    Figure 3.  Relationship between the number of newly generated Frenkel defect pairs and the size of preset vacancy cluster and PKA energy.

    图 4  Ti-V-Ta多主元合金与不同尺寸空位团簇级联重叠形成的典型缺陷构型(5 keV), 红色和蓝色为间隙原子和空位, 粉线和绿线为$ \left\langle {100} \right\rangle $和1/2$ \left\langle {111} \right\rangle $位错线

    Figure 4.  Typical defect configuration formed during the cascade overlap simulations with different size vacancy clusters in Ti-V-Ta multi-principal element alloy (5 keV), red and blue interstitials and vacancies, and pink and green lines are $ \left\langle {100} \right\rangle $ and 1/2$ \left\langle {111} \right\rangle $ dislocation lines.

    图 5  Ti-V-Ta多主元合金中与空位团簇在不同条件下级联重叠后形成的缺陷构型数目

    Figure 5.  Number of defect configurations formed in Ti-V-Ta multi-principal element alloy after cascade overlap simulations with vacancy clusters under different conditions.

    图 6  纯V与不同尺寸空位团簇级联重叠形成的典型缺陷构型(5 keV), 红色和蓝色为间隙原子和空位, 粉线和绿线为$ \left\langle {100} \right\rangle $和1/2$ \left\langle {111} \right\rangle $位错线

    Figure 6.  Typical defect configuration formed during the cascade overlap simulations with different size vacancy clusters in pure V (5 keV), red and blue interstitials and vacancies, and pink and green lines are $ \left\langle {100} \right\rangle $ and 1/2$ \left\langle {111} \right\rangle $ dislocation lines.

    图 7  Ti-V-Ta多主元合金与间隙团簇级联重叠形成1/2$ \left\langle {111} \right\rangle $位错环的缺陷演化过程(40 keV, $ {N}_{{\mathrm{S}}{\mathrm{I}}{\mathrm{A}}} $= 183), 红色和蓝色为间隙原子和空位, 绿线为1/2$ \left\langle {111} \right\rangle $位错线

    Figure 7.  Defect evolution process during the cascade overlap simulation with interstitial cluster (40 keV, $ {N}_{{\mathrm{S}}{\mathrm{I}}{\mathrm{A}}} $= 183) in Ti-V-Ta multi-principal element alloy, red and blue are interstitials and vacancies, green lines are 1/2$ \left\langle {111} \right\rangle $ dislocation lines.

    图 8  Ti-V-Ta多主元合金与间隙团簇级联重叠形成$ \left\langle {100} \right\rangle $间隙位错环的缺陷演化过程(40 keV, $ {N}_{{\mathrm{S}}{\mathrm{I}}{\mathrm{A}}} $= 183), 红色和蓝色为间隙原子和空位, 粉线为$ \left\langle {100} \right\rangle $位错线

    Figure 8.  Defect evolution process during the cascade overlap simulation with interstitial cluster (40 keV, $ {N}_{{\mathrm{S}}{\mathrm{I}}{\mathrm{A}}} $= 183) in Ti-V-Ta multi-principal element alloy, red and blue are interstitials and vacancies, pink lines are $ \left\langle {100} \right\rangle $ dislocation lines.

    图 9  Ti-V-Ta多主元合金与间隙团簇级联重叠形成的典型缺陷构型(40 keV, $ {N}_{{\mathrm{S}}{\mathrm{I}}{\mathrm{A}}} $=183), 红色和蓝色为间隙原子和空位, 粉线和绿线为$ \left\langle {100} \right\rangle $和1/2$ \left\langle {111} \right\rangle $位错线

    Figure 9.  Typical defect configuration during the cascade overlap simulation with interstitial cluster (40 keV, $ {N}_{{\mathrm{S}}{\mathrm{I}}{\mathrm{A}}} $=183) in Ti-V-Ta multi-principal element alloy, red and blue are interstitials and vacancies, pink and green lines are $ \left\langle {100} \right\rangle $ and 1/2$ \left\langle {111} \right\rangle $ dislocation lines.

    图 10  纯V与间隙团簇级联重叠形成的典型缺陷构型(40 keV, $ {N}_{{\mathrm{S}}{\mathrm{I}}{\mathrm{A}}} $=183), 红色和蓝色为间隙原子和空位, 粉线和绿线为$ \left\langle {100} \right\rangle $和1/2$ \left\langle {111} \right\rangle $位错线

    Figure 10.  Typical defect configuration during the cascade overlap simulation with interstitial cluster (40 keV, $ {N}_{{\mathrm{S}}{\mathrm{I}}{\mathrm{A}}} $=183) in pure V, red and blue are interstitials and vacancies, pink and green lines are $ \left\langle {100} \right\rangle $ and 1/2$ \left\langle {111} \right\rangle $ dislocation lines.

    图 11  Ti-V-Ta多主元合金中辐照位错环形成的级联重叠机制示意图

    Figure 11.  Schematic diagram of the cascade overlap mechanism of dislocation loops formation in Ti-V-Ta multi-principal element alloy.

    Baidu
  • [1]

    El-Genk M S, Tournier J M 2005 J. Nucl. Mater. 340 93Google Scholar

    [2]

    Busby J T, Leonard K J 2007 JOM 59 20

    [3]

    Yeh J W, Chen S K, Lin S J, Gan J Y, Chin T S, Shun T T, Tsau C H, Chang S Y 2004 Adv. Eng. Mater. 6 299Google Scholar

    [4]

    Tsai M H, Yeh J W 2014 Mater. Res. Lett. 2 107Google Scholar

    [5]

    Ye Y F, Wang Q, Lu J, Liu C T, Yang Y 2016 Mater. Today 19 349Google Scholar

    [6]

    Miracle D B, Senkov O N 2017 Acta Mater. 122 448Google Scholar

    [7]

    George E P, Raabe D, Ritchie R O 2019 Nat. Rev. Mater. 4 515Google Scholar

    [8]

    Pickering E J, Carruthers A W, Barron P J, Middleburgh S C, Armstrong D E J, Gandy A S 2021 Entropy 23 98Google Scholar

    [9]

    Jia N N, Li Y K, Liu X, Zheng Y, Wang B P, Wang J S, Xue Y F, Jin K 2019 JOM. 71 3490Google Scholar

    [10]

    Hu B, Yao B, Wang J, Liu Y, Wang C J, Du Y, Yin H Q 2020 Intermetallics 118 106701Google Scholar

    [11]

    Yin X, Dou Y K, He X F, Jin K, Wang C L, Dong Y G, Wang H R, Zhong W H, Xue Y F, Yang W 2022 JOM 74 4326Google Scholar

    [12]

    Jia N N, Li Y, Huang H F, Chen S, Li D, Dou Y K, He X F, Yang W, Yin X, Jin K 2021 J. Nucl. Mater. 550 152937Google Scholar

    [13]

    Mei L, Zhang Q H, Dou Y K, Fu E G, Li L, Chen S, Dong Y G, Guo X, He X F, Yang W, Yin X, Jin K 2023 Scr. Mater. 223 115070Google Scholar

    [14]

    Dou Y K, Zhao Y P, He X F, Gao J, Cao J L, Yang W 2023 J. Nucl. Mater. 573 154096Google Scholar

    [15]

    Zhao Y P, Dou Y K, He X F, Deng H Q, Wang L F, Yang W 2023 Comput. Mater. Sci. 218 111943Google Scholar

    [16]

    Zhao Y P, Dou Y K, He X F, Cao H, Wang L F, Deng H Q, Yang W 2024 Chin. Phys. B 33 036104Google Scholar

    [17]

    Peng Q, Meng F J, Yang Y Z, Lu C Y, Deng H Q, Wang L M, De S, Gao F 2018 Nat. Commun. 9 4880Google Scholar

    [18]

    Granberg F, Byggmästar J, Sand A E, Nordlund K 2017 Europhys. Lett. 119 56003Google Scholar

    [19]

    Byggmästar J, Granberg F, Sand A E, Pirttikoski A, Alexander R, Marinica M C, Nordlund K 2019 J. Phys. Condens. Matter. 31 245402Google Scholar

    [20]

    Wang X Y, Gao N, Wang Y N, Liu H L, Shu G G, Li C L, Xu B, Liu W 2019 J. Nucl. Mater. 519 322Google Scholar

    [21]

    Marinica M C, Willaime F, Crocombette J P 2012 Phys. Rev. Lett. 108 025501Google Scholar

    [22]

    Gao J, Gaganidze E, Kaiser B, Aktaa J 2021 J. Nucl. Mater. 557 153212Google Scholar

    [23]

    Esfandiarpour A, Byggmästar J, Balbuena J P, Caturla M J, Nordlund K, Granberg F 2022 Materialia. 21 101344Google Scholar

    [24]

    Arakawa K, Hatanaka M, Kuramoto E, Ono K, Mori H 2006 Phys. Rev. Lett. 96 125506Google Scholar

    [25]

    Chen J, Gao N, Jung P, Sauvage T 2013 J. Nucl. Mater. 441 216Google Scholar

    [26]

    Gao N, Chen J, Kurtz R J, Wang Z G, Zhang R F, Gao F 2017 J. Phys. Condens. Matter. 29 455301Google Scholar

    [27]

    Xu H, Stoller R E, Osetsky Y N, Terentyev D 2013 Phys. Rev. Lett. 110 265503Google Scholar

    [28]

    Wang X Y, Gao N, Wang Y N, Wu X Y, Shu G G, Li C L, Li Q L, Xu B, Liu W 2019 Scr. Mater. 162 204Google Scholar

    [29]

    Plimpton S 1995 J. Comput. Phys. 117 1Google Scholar

    [30]

    Qiu R Y, Chen Y C, Liao X C, He X F, Yang W, Hu W Y, Deng H Q 2021 J. Nucl. Mater. 557 153231Google Scholar

    [31]

    Stukowski A 2010 Model. Simul. Mater. Sc. 18 015012Google Scholar

    [32]

    Fellman A, Sand A E 2022 J. Nucl. Mater. 572 154020Google Scholar

    [33]

    Fellman A, Sand A E, Byggmästar J, Nordlund K 2019 J. Phys. Condens. Matter. 31 405402Google Scholar

    [34]

    Qiu R Y, Chen Y C, Gao N, He X F, Dou Y K, Yang W, Hu W Y, Deng H Q 2023 Nucl. Mater. Energy 34 101394Google Scholar

  • [1] Chen Bei, Wang Xiao-Yun, Liu Tao, Gao Ming, Wen Da-Dong, Deng Yong-He, Peng Ping. Symmetry and order of the kinetic heterogeneity in Pd-Si amorphous alloys. Acta Physica Sinica, 2024, 73(24): . doi: 10.7498/aps.73.20241051
    [2] Yu Xin-Xiu, Li Duo-Sheng, Ye Yin, Lang Wen-Chang, Liu Jun-Hong, Chen Jing-Song, Yu Shuang-Shuang. Molecular dynamics simulation of effect of nickel transition layer on deposition of carbon atoms and graphene growth on cemented carbide surfaces. Acta Physica Sinica, 2024, 73(23): 238701. doi: 10.7498/aps.73.20241170
    [3] Zhang Yu-Hang, Li Xiao-Bao, Zhan Chun-Xiao, Wang Mei-Qin, Pu Yu-Xue. Molecular dynamics simulation study on mechanical properties of Janus MoSSe monolayer. Acta Physica Sinica, 2023, 72(4): 046201. doi: 10.7498/aps.72.20221815
    [4] Wen Peng,  Tao Gang. Molecular dynamics study of the effect of temperature on the shock response and plastic deformation mechanism of CoCrFeMnNi high-entropy alloys. Acta Physica Sinica, 2023, 0(0): 0-0. doi: 10.7498/aps.72.20221621
    [5] Ding Ye-Zhang, Ye Yin, Li Duo-Sheng, Xu Feng, Lang Wen-Chang, Liu Jun-Hong, Wen Xin. Molecular dynamics simulation of graphene deposition and growth on WC-Co cemented carbides. Acta Physica Sinica, 2023, 72(6): 068703. doi: 10.7498/aps.72.20221332
    [6] Wen Peng, Tao Gang. Molecular dynamics study of temperature effects on shock response and plastic deformation mechanism of CoCrFeMnNi high-entropy alloys. Acta Physica Sinica, 2022, 71(24): 246101. doi: 10.7498/aps.71.20221621
    [7] Wang Jin, He Xin-Fu, Cao Han, Jia Li-Xia, Dou Yan-Kun, Yang Wen. Screw dislocation slip and its interaction with ½[${{11}}\bar {{1}}$] dislocation loop in bcc-Fe at different temperatures. Acta Physica Sinica, 2021, 70(6): 068701. doi: 10.7498/aps.70.20201659
    [8] Yang Quan, Ma Li, Geng Song-Chao, Lin Yi-Ni, Chen Tao, Sun Li-Ning. Molecular dynamics simulation of contact behaviors between multiwall carbon nanotube and metal surface. Acta Physica Sinica, 2021, 70(10): 106101. doi: 10.7498/aps.70.20202194
    [9] Zhou Ming-Jin, Hou Qing, Pan Rong-Jian, Wu Lu, Fu Bao-Qin. Molecular dynamics study of special quasirandom structure of Zr-Nb alloys. Acta Physica Sinica, 2021, 70(3): 033103. doi: 10.7498/aps.70.20201407
    [10] Zhu Qi, Wang Sheng-Tao, Zhao Fu-Qi, Pan Hao. Effect of stacking fault tetrahedron on spallation of irradiated Cu via molecular dynamics study. Acta Physica Sinica, 2020, 69(3): 036201. doi: 10.7498/aps.69.20191425
    [11] Yuan Wei, Peng Hai-Bo, Du Xin, Lü Peng, Shen Yang-Hao, Zhao Yan, Chen Liang, Wang Tie-Shan. Structure evalution of electron irradiated borosilicate glass simuluated by molecular dynamics. Acta Physica Sinica, 2017, 66(10): 106102. doi: 10.7498/aps.66.106102
    [12] Deng Yong-He, Wen Da-Dong, Peng Chao, Wei Yan-Ding, Zhao Rui, Peng Ping. Heredity of icosahedrons: a kinetic parameter related to glass-forming abilities of rapidly solidified Cu56Zr44 alloys. Acta Physica Sinica, 2016, 65(6): 066401. doi: 10.7498/aps.65.066401
    [13] Wang Cheng-Long, Wang Qing-Yu, Zhang Yue, Li Zhong-Yu, Hong Bing, Su Zhe, Dong Liang. Molecular dynamics study of cascade damage at SiC/C interface. Acta Physica Sinica, 2014, 63(15): 153402. doi: 10.7498/aps.63.153402
    [14] Wu Wen-Ping, Guo Ya-Fang, Wang Yue-Sheng, Xu Shuang. Evolution of interphase misfit dislocation networks in Ni-based single crystal superalloy under shear loading. Acta Physica Sinica, 2011, 60(5): 056802. doi: 10.7498/aps.60.056802
    [15] Chen Min. Molecular dynamics study of small helium cluster diffusion in titanium. Acta Physica Sinica, 2011, 60(12): 126602. doi: 10.7498/aps.60.126602
    [16] Wang Wei, Zhang Kai-Wang, Meng Li-Jun, Li Zhong-Qiu, Zuo Xue-Yun, Zhong Jian-Xin. Molecular dynamics simulation of the evaporation of the surface wall of multi-wall carbon nanotubes at high temperature. Acta Physica Sinica, 2010, 59(4): 2672-2678. doi: 10.7498/aps.59.2672
    [17] Zhu Tao, Wang Chong-Yu, Gan Yong. Evolution of interphase misfit dislocation networks in Ni-based single-crystal superalloy. Acta Physica Sinica, 2009, 58(13): 156-S160. doi: 10.7498/aps.58.156
    [18] Zhou Nai-Gen, Zhou Lang. Prevention of misfit dislocations by using nano pillar crystal array substrates. Acta Physica Sinica, 2008, 57(5): 3064-3070. doi: 10.7498/aps.57.3064
    [19] Zhang Chao, Wang Yong-Liang, Yan Chao, Zhang Qing-Yu. Numerical simulation of the influence of substitutional impurity on the interaction between low-energy Pt atoms and Pt(111) surface. Acta Physica Sinica, 2006, 55(6): 2882-2891. doi: 10.7498/aps.55.2882
    [20] Zhou Nai-Gen, Zhou Lang. Conditions for formation of misfit dislocation in epitaxial films — a molecular dynamics study. Acta Physica Sinica, 2005, 54(7): 3278-3283. doi: 10.7498/aps.54.3278
Metrics
  • Abstract views:  251
  • PDF Downloads:  7
  • Cited By: 0
Publishing process
  • Received Date:  27 July 2024
  • Accepted Date:  27 September 2024
  • Available Online:  16 October 2024
  • Published Online:  20 November 2024

/

返回文章
返回
Baidu
map