-
Stacking fault tetrahedron (SFT) is a common type of three-dimensional vacancy clustered defect in irradiated FCC metals and alloys, which has a great influence on the mechanical properties of the materials. Previous researches mostly concentrated on the effect of SFT on the mechanical response of material under quasi-static or constant strain rate loading condition, while very few studies focused on its influence on mechanical properties under the shock loading condition. Spallation is a typical failure mode of ductile metal material under shock loading, and the initial defects in the material have a great influence on the spallation behavior. In this study, molecular dynamics simulation is carried out to investigate the influence of SFT on spallation behavior of irradiated copper single crystal under different shock intensities. Copper single crystal with a perfect structural model is also investigated under the same simulation condition for comparison. The model is divided into two parts: the flyer and the target. The shock wave is generated by moving the flyer at a velocity in a range of 1.0–2.5 km/s along the [111] crystallographic orientation to achieve the desired shock-state particle velocity Up in a range of 0.5–1.25 km/s. The time evolution of pressure, free surface velocity and corresponding microstructure, are analyzed in detail to illuminate the spallation behavior of the Cu with SFT. It is revealed that the SFT collapses during shock compression and induces the generation of dislocations and stacking faults in the material. Subsequently, spallation happens when the voids nucleate and grow in the region of dislocations and stacking faults. Moreover, the materials show different spallation behaviors at different shock intensities. When Up ≤ 1.0 km/s, only elastic deformation occurs in perfect single crystal copper under shock compression, but in the copper with SFT, local defects appear and plastic deformation occurs due to the collapse of SFT under shock compression. The influence of SFT on spallation is most pronounced at a medium shock intensity. When Up = 0.75 km/s, the local defects caused by the collapse of SFT provide a wider nucleation area for the voids and promote the heterogeneous nucleation of the voids, resulting in the decreasing of the spall strength. The void nucleation of single crystal copper with SFT is found to be much later than the perfect one and the rate of spall damage evolution also decreases due to energy dissipation during SFT’s collapse and plastic deformation. When Up increases to 1.25 km/s, shock compression induces many defected atoms in both samples, so the SFT has little influence on the spall strength and spall damage of the materials.
-
Keywords:
- spallation /
- stacking fault tetrahedron /
- shock /
- molecular dynamics
[1] Zinkle S J, Busby J T 2009 Mater. Today 12 12
[2] Yoshida N, Akashi Y, Kitajima K, Kiritani M 1985 J. Nucl. Mater. 133 405
[3] Zinkle S J, Farrell K 1989 J. Nucl. Mater. 168 262
Google Scholar
[4] Hashimoto N, Byun T S, Farrell K 2006 J. Nucl. Mater. 351 295
Google Scholar
[5] Schäublin R, Yao Z, Baluc N, Victoria M 2005 Philos. Mag. 85 769
Google Scholar
[6] Fabritsiev S A, Pokrovsky A S 2007 J. Nucl. Mater. 367 977
[7] Shao J L, Wang P, He A M, Duan S Q, Qin C S 2014 Modell. Simul. Mater. Sci. Eng. 22 025012
Google Scholar
[8] Zhou T T, He A M, Wang P, Shao J L 2019 Comput. Mater. Sci. 162 255
Google Scholar
[9] Lin E Q, Shi H, Niu L 2014 Modell. Simul. Mater. Sci. Eng. 22 035012
Google Scholar
[10] Qiu T, Xiong Y N, Xiao S F, Li X F, Hu W Y, Deng H Q 2017 Comput. Mater. Sci. 137 273
Google Scholar
[11] Dai Y, Victoria M 1996 MRS. Symp. Proc. 439 319
[12] Edwards D J, Singh B N, Bilde-Sørensen J B 2005 J. Nucl. Mater. 342 164
Google Scholar
[13] Lee H J, Wirth B D 2009 Philos. Mag. 89 821
Google Scholar
[14] Osetsky Y N, Stoller R E, Rodney D, Bacon D J 2005 Mater. Sci. Eng., A 400 370
[15] Osetsky Y N, Rodney D, Bacon D J 2006 Philos. Mag. 86 2295
Google Scholar
[16] Fan H, El-Awady J A, Wang Q 2015 J. Nucl. Mater. 458 176
Google Scholar
[17] Fan H, Wang Q, Ouyang C 2015 J. Nucl. Mater. 465 245
Google Scholar
[18] Martínez E, Uberuaga B P, Beyerlein I J 2016 Phys. Rev. B 93 054105
Google Scholar
[19] Arsenlis A, Wirth B D, Rhee M 2004 Philos. Mag. 84 3617
Google Scholar
[20] Krishna S, Zamiri A, De S 2010 Philos. Mag. 90 4013
Google Scholar
[21] Xiao X Z, Song D K, Xue J M, Chu H J, Duan H L 2015 Int. J. Plast. 65 152
Google Scholar
[22] Zhang L, Lu C, Tieu K, Shibuta Y 2018 Scr. Mater. 144 78
Google Scholar
[23] Wu L P, Yu W S, Hu S L, Shen S P 2017 Int. J. Plast. 97 246
Google Scholar
[24] Wu L P, Yu W S, Hu S L, Shen S P 2018 Comput. Mater. Sci. 155 256
Google Scholar
[25] Xiao X Z, Song D K, Chu H J, Xue J M, Duan H L 2015 Int. J. Plast. 74 110
Google Scholar
[26] Salehinia I, Bahr D F 2012 Scr. Mater. 66 339
Google Scholar
[27] Figueroa E, Tramontina D, Gutierrez G, Bringa E 2015 J. Nucl. Mater. 467 677
Google Scholar
[28] Salehinia I, Lawrence S K, Bahr D F 2013 Acta Mater. 61 1421
Google Scholar
[29] Zhang L, Lu C, Tieu K, Su L, Zhao X, Pei L 2017 Mater. Sci. Eng., A 680 27
Google Scholar
[30] Mishin Y, Mehl M J, Papaconstantopoulos D A, Voter A F, Kress J D 2001 Phys. Rev. B 63 224106
Google Scholar
[31] Silcox J, Hirsch P B 1959 Philos. Mag. 4 1356
Google Scholar
[32] Thompson A P, Plimpton S J, Mattson W 2009 J. Chem. Phys. 131 154107
Google Scholar
[33] Stukowski A 2010 Modell. Simul. Mater. Sci. Eng. 18 015012
[34] Stukowski A 2012 Modell. Simul. Mater. Sci. Eng. 20 045021
Google Scholar
[35] Stukowski A, Albe K 2010 Modell. Simul. Mater. Sci. Eng. 18 085001
Google Scholar
[36] Luo S N, Qi A, Germann T C, Han L B 2009 J. Appl. Phys. 106 013502
Google Scholar
[37] 裴晓阳, 彭辉, 贺红亮, 李平 2015 64 034601
Google Scholar
Pei X Y, Peng H, He H L, Li P 2015 Acta Phys. Sin. 64 034601
Google Scholar
-
图 1 模拟初始构型 (a) 整体构型, 箭头方向代表冲击方向; (b) 模型中的层错四面体分布
Figure 1. Initial configuration of the simulation system: (a) The equilibrated atomic configuration, and the arrow denotes the direction of impact; (b) the internal distribution of SFT.
图 2 SFT的形成过程
Figure 2. Snapshots of SFT formation.
图 3 不同Up对应的层裂强度分布图
Figure 3. Relationship between particle velocity Up and spall strength of perfect Cu and Cu with SFT.
图 4 压缩过程中SFT的演化形态图及对应的位错演化图(其中, 玫红色线是压杆位错, 绿色线是Shockley不完全位错, 浅蓝色线是Frank不完全位错, 红色线是其他位错) (a) Up = 0.5 km/s; (b) Up = 0.75 km/s
Figure 4. Snapshots of SFT configuration and dislocation evolution at different deformation stages during shock compression: (a) Up = 0.5 km/s; (b) Up = 0.75 km/s. The rose red line represents the stair-rod dislocation, the green line represents the Shockley partial dislocation, the light blue line represents the Frank partial dislocation, and the red line is the undefined dislocation.
图 5 不同冲击速度下单晶铜在压缩和拉伸过程中的微结构演化图 (a) Up = 0.75 km/s; (b) Up = 1.25 km/s
Figure 5. Atomic configuration in Cu crystal during shock compression and tension at different impact velocity: (a) Up = 0.75 km/s; (b) Up = 1.25 km/s.
图 6 Up = 0.75 km/s时孔洞演化图像及位错分布图 (a) 完美单晶铜; (b) 含SFT铜
Figure 6. Void and dislocation evolution during spallation at Up = 0.75 km/s: (a) Perfect crystal Cu; (b) Cu with SFT.
图 7 Up = 0.75 km/s时孔洞演化对应的应力温度分布图 (a) 应力; (b) 温度
Figure 7. Stress and temperature profiles for single crystal copper at Up = 0.75 km/s: (a) Stress; (b) temperature.
图 8 不同Up对应的自由表面速度曲线图 (a) Up = 0.75 km/s; (b) Up = 1.25 km/s
Figure 8. Free surface velocity evolution history for single crystal copper at different velocities: (a) Up = 0.75 km/s; (b) Up = 1.25 km/s.
-
[1] Zinkle S J, Busby J T 2009 Mater. Today 12 12
[2] Yoshida N, Akashi Y, Kitajima K, Kiritani M 1985 J. Nucl. Mater. 133 405
[3] Zinkle S J, Farrell K 1989 J. Nucl. Mater. 168 262
Google Scholar
[4] Hashimoto N, Byun T S, Farrell K 2006 J. Nucl. Mater. 351 295
Google Scholar
[5] Schäublin R, Yao Z, Baluc N, Victoria M 2005 Philos. Mag. 85 769
Google Scholar
[6] Fabritsiev S A, Pokrovsky A S 2007 J. Nucl. Mater. 367 977
[7] Shao J L, Wang P, He A M, Duan S Q, Qin C S 2014 Modell. Simul. Mater. Sci. Eng. 22 025012
Google Scholar
[8] Zhou T T, He A M, Wang P, Shao J L 2019 Comput. Mater. Sci. 162 255
Google Scholar
[9] Lin E Q, Shi H, Niu L 2014 Modell. Simul. Mater. Sci. Eng. 22 035012
Google Scholar
[10] Qiu T, Xiong Y N, Xiao S F, Li X F, Hu W Y, Deng H Q 2017 Comput. Mater. Sci. 137 273
Google Scholar
[11] Dai Y, Victoria M 1996 MRS. Symp. Proc. 439 319
[12] Edwards D J, Singh B N, Bilde-Sørensen J B 2005 J. Nucl. Mater. 342 164
Google Scholar
[13] Lee H J, Wirth B D 2009 Philos. Mag. 89 821
Google Scholar
[14] Osetsky Y N, Stoller R E, Rodney D, Bacon D J 2005 Mater. Sci. Eng., A 400 370
[15] Osetsky Y N, Rodney D, Bacon D J 2006 Philos. Mag. 86 2295
Google Scholar
[16] Fan H, El-Awady J A, Wang Q 2015 J. Nucl. Mater. 458 176
Google Scholar
[17] Fan H, Wang Q, Ouyang C 2015 J. Nucl. Mater. 465 245
Google Scholar
[18] Martínez E, Uberuaga B P, Beyerlein I J 2016 Phys. Rev. B 93 054105
Google Scholar
[19] Arsenlis A, Wirth B D, Rhee M 2004 Philos. Mag. 84 3617
Google Scholar
[20] Krishna S, Zamiri A, De S 2010 Philos. Mag. 90 4013
Google Scholar
[21] Xiao X Z, Song D K, Xue J M, Chu H J, Duan H L 2015 Int. J. Plast. 65 152
Google Scholar
[22] Zhang L, Lu C, Tieu K, Shibuta Y 2018 Scr. Mater. 144 78
Google Scholar
[23] Wu L P, Yu W S, Hu S L, Shen S P 2017 Int. J. Plast. 97 246
Google Scholar
[24] Wu L P, Yu W S, Hu S L, Shen S P 2018 Comput. Mater. Sci. 155 256
Google Scholar
[25] Xiao X Z, Song D K, Chu H J, Xue J M, Duan H L 2015 Int. J. Plast. 74 110
Google Scholar
[26] Salehinia I, Bahr D F 2012 Scr. Mater. 66 339
Google Scholar
[27] Figueroa E, Tramontina D, Gutierrez G, Bringa E 2015 J. Nucl. Mater. 467 677
Google Scholar
[28] Salehinia I, Lawrence S K, Bahr D F 2013 Acta Mater. 61 1421
Google Scholar
[29] Zhang L, Lu C, Tieu K, Su L, Zhao X, Pei L 2017 Mater. Sci. Eng., A 680 27
Google Scholar
[30] Mishin Y, Mehl M J, Papaconstantopoulos D A, Voter A F, Kress J D 2001 Phys. Rev. B 63 224106
Google Scholar
[31] Silcox J, Hirsch P B 1959 Philos. Mag. 4 1356
Google Scholar
[32] Thompson A P, Plimpton S J, Mattson W 2009 J. Chem. Phys. 131 154107
Google Scholar
[33] Stukowski A 2010 Modell. Simul. Mater. Sci. Eng. 18 015012
[34] Stukowski A 2012 Modell. Simul. Mater. Sci. Eng. 20 045021
Google Scholar
[35] Stukowski A, Albe K 2010 Modell. Simul. Mater. Sci. Eng. 18 085001
Google Scholar
[36] Luo S N, Qi A, Germann T C, Han L B 2009 J. Appl. Phys. 106 013502
Google Scholar
[37] 裴晓阳, 彭辉, 贺红亮, 李平 2015 64 034601
Google Scholar
Pei X Y, Peng H, He H L, Li P 2015 Acta Phys. Sin. 64 034601
Google Scholar
DownLoad:
Catalog
Metrics
- Abstract views: 17590
- PDF Downloads: 225
- Cited By: 0
