-
The distinct physical properties of liquid nitrogen make liquid nitrogen spray cooling a promising technique in aerospace engineering, the electronic industry, superconductor cooling, cryobiology, etc. In-depth study of the dynamics and thermodynamic behavior of liquid nitrogen droplets impinging on the wall surface is helpful to understand the heat transfer mechanism of spray cooling technology with liquid nitrogen. Therefore, the mathematical model of single-liquid nitrogen droplet impacted solid surface is developed by Level Set-VOF method. The effects of wall wettability (30°-150°), initial velocity (0.1, 1.6 m/s) and wall temperature (300-500 K) on the phase change behavior during the evolution of droplets are investigated, and the mathematical model of film thickness is established. The results show that enhancing the wall wettability and increasing the impact speed facilitate the spreading of the droplets in the radial direction, thereby increasing the heat exchange area and reducing the thermal resistance. Ultimately, the heat exchange performance is significantly improved. Increasing the wall temperature results in an increase in the difference between temperatures of the solid surface and the liquid, thereby significantly increasing the wall heat flux density. The lower thermal resistance at the three-phase contact line results in a higher heat flux density at the edge than in the center; the difference among the heat flux distributions on different wetted walls decreases due to the increase of initial velocity, showing a significant velocity effect. In the film boiling region, the heat transfer process is mainly concentrated in the initial stage of impact, and the gas film is the main heat transfer resistance. Based on conservation of mass and energy, a numerical model of film thickness is developed in this paper. The model predictions are in good agreement with the simulation results of this paper and others.
-
Keywords:
- Leidenfrost /
- liquid nitrogen /
- impingement /
- Level Set-VOF simulation
[1] Liang G T, Mudawar I 2017 Int. J. Heat Mass. Tran. 115 1174Google Scholar
[2] Liang G T, Mudawar I 2017 Int. J. Heat Mass. Tran. 115 1206Google Scholar
[3] Somasundaram S, Tay A A O 2014 Appl. Therm. Eng. 69 199Google Scholar
[4] Liu X F, Xue R, Ruan Y X, Chen L, Zhang X Q, Hou Y 2017 Cryogenics 83 57Google Scholar
[5] Xue R, Ruan Y X, Liu X F, Chen L, Zhang X Q, Hou Y, Chen S T 2018 Appl. Therm. Eng. 142 717Google Scholar
[6] Kilgore R A, Dress D A 1984 Cryogenics 24 395Google Scholar
[7] Tran T, Staat H J J, Susarrey-Arce A, Foertsch T C, van Houselt A, Gardeniers H J G E, Prosperetti A, Lohse D, Sun C 2013 Soft Matter. 9 3272Google Scholar
[8] Celestini F, Kirstetter G 2012 Soft Matter. 8 5992Google Scholar
[9] 叶学民, 李永康, 李春曦 2016 65 104704Google Scholar
Ye X M, Li Y K, Li C X 2016 Acta Phys. Sin. 65 104704Google Scholar
[10] Karl A, Frohn A 2000 Phys. Fluids. 12 785Google Scholar
[11] Scheller B L, Bousfield D W 1995 AIChE J. 41 1357Google Scholar
[12] 刘海龙, 沈学峰, 王睿, 曹宇, 王军锋 2018 力学学报 50 1024Google Scholar
Liu H L, Shen X F, Wang R, Cao Y, Wang J F 2018 Acta Mech. Sin. 50 1024Google Scholar
[13] 沈胜强, 张洁珊, 梁刚涛 2015 64 134704Google Scholar
Shen S Q, Zhang J S, Liang G T 2015 Acta Phys. Sin. 64 134704Google Scholar
[14] Šikalo Š, Wilhelm H D, Roisman I V, Jakirlić S, Tropea C 2005 Phys. Fluids 17 062103Google Scholar
[15] 梁刚涛, 郭亚丽, 沈胜强 2013 62 184703Google Scholar
Liang G T, Guo Y L, Shen S Q 2013 Acta Phys. Sin. 62 184703Google Scholar
[16] Tran T, Staat H J J, Prosperetti A, Sun C, Lohse D 2012 Phys. Rev. Lett. 108 036101Google Scholar
[17] 梁刚涛, 郭亚丽, 沈胜强 2013 62 024705Google Scholar
Liang G T, Guo Y L, Shen S Q 2013 Acta Phys. Sin. 62 024705Google Scholar
[18] Lee W H 1980 A Pressure Iteration Scheme for Two-Phase Flow Modeling (Washington: Hemisphere Publishing) pp407–432
[19] De Schepper S C K, Heynderickx G J, Marin G B 2009 Comput. Chem. Eng. 33 122Google Scholar
[20] Alizadehdakhel A, Rahimi M, Alsairafi A A 2010 Int. Commun. Heat. Mass. 37 312Google Scholar
[21] Hatta N, Fujimoto H, Kinoshita K, Takuda H 1997 J. Fluid. Eng. 119 692Google Scholar
[22] Liang G T, Shen S Q, Guo Y L, Zhang J L 2016 Int. J. Heat Mass. Tran. 100 48Google Scholar
[23] Chandra S, Aziz S D 1994 J. Heat. Trans. 116 999Google Scholar
[24] 李大树, 仇性启, 郑志伟, 崔云静, 马培勇 2015 农业机械学报 46 294Google Scholar
Li D S, Chou X Q, Zheng Z W, Cui Y J, Ma P Y 2015 Transactions of the Chinese Society for Agricultural Machinery 46 294Google Scholar
[25] Kim H, Kim J 2010 J. Micromech. Microeng. 20 045008Google Scholar
[26] 李大树, 仇性启, 崔云静, 郑志伟, 马培勇, 祁风雷 2014 农业机械学报 45 25Google Scholar
Li D S, Chou X Q, Cui Y J, Zheng Z W, Ma P Y, Qi F L 2014 Transactions of the Chinese Society for Agricultural Machinery 45 25Google Scholar
[27] Chaidron G, Soucemarianadin A, Attané P 1999 Am. Mineral. 84 1235Google Scholar
[28] Breitenbach J, Roisman I V, Tropea C 2018 Exp. Fluids 59 55Google Scholar
[29] Manzello S L, Yang J C 2002 P. Roy. Soc. A:-Math. Phys. 458 2417Google Scholar
[30] 吴苏晨, 张程宾, 陈永平, 施明恒 2018 工程热 39 174
Wu S C, Zhang C B, Chen Y P, Shi M H 2018 J. Eng. Thermophys. 39 174
[31] Aussillous P, Quéré D 2001 Nature 411 924Google Scholar
[32] Quéré D 2013 Annu. Rev. Fluid. Mech. 45 197
[33] Breitenbach J, Roisman I V, Tropea C 2017 Int. J. Heat. Mass. Tran. 110 34Google Scholar
-
表 1 相关参数
Table 1. Related parameters.
参数 数值 液氮密度/kg·m–3 806.88 液氮表面张力系数/N·m–1 8.22 × 10–3 液氮黏度/Pa·s 160.08 × 10–6 液氮滴初始速度/m·s–1 0.1—1.6 液氮滴初始直径/mm 0.5 液氮滴初始温度/K 78 壁面温度/K 300—500 液氮潜热/kJ·kg–1 199.3 氮气导热系数/W·cm–1·K–1 0.002475 氮气黏度/Pa·s 17.54 × 10–6 氮气密度/kg·m–3 1.16 -
[1] Liang G T, Mudawar I 2017 Int. J. Heat Mass. Tran. 115 1174Google Scholar
[2] Liang G T, Mudawar I 2017 Int. J. Heat Mass. Tran. 115 1206Google Scholar
[3] Somasundaram S, Tay A A O 2014 Appl. Therm. Eng. 69 199Google Scholar
[4] Liu X F, Xue R, Ruan Y X, Chen L, Zhang X Q, Hou Y 2017 Cryogenics 83 57Google Scholar
[5] Xue R, Ruan Y X, Liu X F, Chen L, Zhang X Q, Hou Y, Chen S T 2018 Appl. Therm. Eng. 142 717Google Scholar
[6] Kilgore R A, Dress D A 1984 Cryogenics 24 395Google Scholar
[7] Tran T, Staat H J J, Susarrey-Arce A, Foertsch T C, van Houselt A, Gardeniers H J G E, Prosperetti A, Lohse D, Sun C 2013 Soft Matter. 9 3272Google Scholar
[8] Celestini F, Kirstetter G 2012 Soft Matter. 8 5992Google Scholar
[9] 叶学民, 李永康, 李春曦 2016 65 104704Google Scholar
Ye X M, Li Y K, Li C X 2016 Acta Phys. Sin. 65 104704Google Scholar
[10] Karl A, Frohn A 2000 Phys. Fluids. 12 785Google Scholar
[11] Scheller B L, Bousfield D W 1995 AIChE J. 41 1357Google Scholar
[12] 刘海龙, 沈学峰, 王睿, 曹宇, 王军锋 2018 力学学报 50 1024Google Scholar
Liu H L, Shen X F, Wang R, Cao Y, Wang J F 2018 Acta Mech. Sin. 50 1024Google Scholar
[13] 沈胜强, 张洁珊, 梁刚涛 2015 64 134704Google Scholar
Shen S Q, Zhang J S, Liang G T 2015 Acta Phys. Sin. 64 134704Google Scholar
[14] Šikalo Š, Wilhelm H D, Roisman I V, Jakirlić S, Tropea C 2005 Phys. Fluids 17 062103Google Scholar
[15] 梁刚涛, 郭亚丽, 沈胜强 2013 62 184703Google Scholar
Liang G T, Guo Y L, Shen S Q 2013 Acta Phys. Sin. 62 184703Google Scholar
[16] Tran T, Staat H J J, Prosperetti A, Sun C, Lohse D 2012 Phys. Rev. Lett. 108 036101Google Scholar
[17] 梁刚涛, 郭亚丽, 沈胜强 2013 62 024705Google Scholar
Liang G T, Guo Y L, Shen S Q 2013 Acta Phys. Sin. 62 024705Google Scholar
[18] Lee W H 1980 A Pressure Iteration Scheme for Two-Phase Flow Modeling (Washington: Hemisphere Publishing) pp407–432
[19] De Schepper S C K, Heynderickx G J, Marin G B 2009 Comput. Chem. Eng. 33 122Google Scholar
[20] Alizadehdakhel A, Rahimi M, Alsairafi A A 2010 Int. Commun. Heat. Mass. 37 312Google Scholar
[21] Hatta N, Fujimoto H, Kinoshita K, Takuda H 1997 J. Fluid. Eng. 119 692Google Scholar
[22] Liang G T, Shen S Q, Guo Y L, Zhang J L 2016 Int. J. Heat Mass. Tran. 100 48Google Scholar
[23] Chandra S, Aziz S D 1994 J. Heat. Trans. 116 999Google Scholar
[24] 李大树, 仇性启, 郑志伟, 崔云静, 马培勇 2015 农业机械学报 46 294Google Scholar
Li D S, Chou X Q, Zheng Z W, Cui Y J, Ma P Y 2015 Transactions of the Chinese Society for Agricultural Machinery 46 294Google Scholar
[25] Kim H, Kim J 2010 J. Micromech. Microeng. 20 045008Google Scholar
[26] 李大树, 仇性启, 崔云静, 郑志伟, 马培勇, 祁风雷 2014 农业机械学报 45 25Google Scholar
Li D S, Chou X Q, Cui Y J, Zheng Z W, Ma P Y, Qi F L 2014 Transactions of the Chinese Society for Agricultural Machinery 45 25Google Scholar
[27] Chaidron G, Soucemarianadin A, Attané P 1999 Am. Mineral. 84 1235Google Scholar
[28] Breitenbach J, Roisman I V, Tropea C 2018 Exp. Fluids 59 55Google Scholar
[29] Manzello S L, Yang J C 2002 P. Roy. Soc. A:-Math. Phys. 458 2417Google Scholar
[30] 吴苏晨, 张程宾, 陈永平, 施明恒 2018 工程热 39 174
Wu S C, Zhang C B, Chen Y P, Shi M H 2018 J. Eng. Thermophys. 39 174
[31] Aussillous P, Quéré D 2001 Nature 411 924Google Scholar
[32] Quéré D 2013 Annu. Rev. Fluid. Mech. 45 197
[33] Breitenbach J, Roisman I V, Tropea C 2017 Int. J. Heat. Mass. Tran. 110 34Google Scholar
Catalog
Metrics
- Abstract views: 8670
- PDF Downloads: 135
- Cited By: 0