Vertical MSM-type CsPbBr<sub>3</sub> thin film photodetectors with fast response speed and low dark current

Cheng Xue-Ming; Cui Wen-Yu; Zhu Lu-Ping; Wang Xia; Liu Zong-Ming; Cao Bing-Qiang

doi:10.7498/aps.73.20241075

Abstract

Halide perovskites exhibit excellent electrical and optical properties and are ideal candidates for active layers in optoelectronic devices, especially in the field of high-performance photodetection, where they demonstrate a competitive advantage in terms of development prospects. Among them, the all-inorganic perovskite CsPbBr₃ has received widespread attention due to its better environmental stability. It is demonstrated in this work that a vertical MSM-type CsPbBr₃ thin-film photodetector has characteristics of fast response time and ultra-low dark current. The use of a vertical structure can reduce the transit distance of photo carriers, enabling the device to achieve a fast response time of 63 μs, which is two orders of magnitude higher than the traditional planar MSM-type photodetectors with a response time of 10 ms. Then, by spinning a charge transport layer between the p-type CsPbBr₃ and Ag electrodes, effective separation of photocarriers at the interface is realized and physical passivation between the perovskite and metal electrodes is also achieved. Due to the superior surface quality of the spun TiO₂ film compared with the NiO_x film, and through Sentaurus TCAD simulations and bandgap analyses, with TiO₂ serving as the electron transport layer, it effectively inhibits the transmission of excess holes in p-type CsPbBr₃. Consequently, the electron transport layer TiO₂ is more effective in reducing dark current than the hole transport layer NiO_x, with a dark current magnitude of only –4.81×10^–12 A at a –1 V bias. Furthermore, this vertical MSM-type CsPbBr₃ thin-film photodetector also has a large linear dynamic range (122 dB), high detectivity (1.16×10¹² Jones), and good photo-stability. Through Sentaurus TCAD simulation, it is found that the charge transport layer selectively blocks carrier transmission, thereby reducing dark current. The simulation results are in good agreement with experimental data, providing theoretical guidance for a more in-depth understanding of the intrinsic physical mechanisms.

Keywords:

Authors and contacts

1.
School of Material Science and Engineering, University of Jinan, Jinan 250022, China
2.
Nuchip Photoelectric Technology Co., Ltd., Zaozhuang 277299, China

Corresponding author: Cao Bing-Qiang, mse_caobq@ujn.edu.cn

Funds: Project supported by the National Basic Research Program of China (Grant No. 2022YFC3700801), the Jinan Education Bureau, China (Grant No. JNSX2023015), and the Jinan Science and Technology Bureau, China (Grant No. 202333042).

FullText HTML : translate this paragraph

Supplements

20-20241075Suppl.pdf

References

[1]	Xu J, Li J, Wang H S, He C Y, Li J L, Bao Y N, Tang H Y, Luo H D, Liu X C, Yang Y M 2021 Adv. Mater. Interfaces 9 2101487 Google Scholar
[2]	Zhang Y, Wu C Y, Zhou X Y, Li J C, Tao X Y, Liu B Y, Chen J W, Chang Y J, Tong G Q, Jiang Y 2023 Mater. Today Phys. 36 101179 Google Scholar
[3]	Liu X Y, Liu Z Y, Li J J, Tan X H, Sun B, Fang H, Xi S, Shi T L, Tang Z R, Liao G L 2020 J. Mater. Chem. C 8 3337 Google Scholar
[4]	Perumalveeramalai C, Zheng J, Wang Y, Guo H L, Pammi S. V. N., Mudike R, Li C B 2024 Chem. Eng. J. 492 152213 Google Scholar
[5]	Wang Y Z, Kublitski J, Xing S, Dollinger F, Spoltore D, Benduhn J, Leo K 2022 Mater. Horiz. 9 220 Google Scholar
[6]	Zheng J B, Yang D Z, Guo D C, Yang L Q, Li Ji, Ma D G 2023 ACS Photonics 10 1382 Google Scholar
[7]	Wang H D, Huang H X, Zha J J, et al. 2023 Adv. Opt. Mater. 11 2301508 Google Scholar
[8]	Gong W Q, Tian Y Z, Yan J, Gao F, Li L 2022 J. Mater. Chem. C 10 7460 Google Scholar
[9]	Qiao S, Liu J H, Wang R N, Guo L J, Wang S F, Pan A L, Pan C F 2023 Adv. Opt. Mater. 11 2300751 Google Scholar
[10]	Li X, Xiang Y, Wan J X, Xiao Z X, Yuan H, Sun J, Liu Y F, Dai G Z, Yang J L 2022 Org. Electron. 101 106409 Google Scholar
[11]	Zhu L P, Cheng X M, Wang A W, Shan Y S, Cao X L, Cao B Q 2023 Appl. Phys. Lett. 123 212105 Google Scholar
[12]	Hu T G, Zhao L X, Wang Y J, Lin H L, Xie S H, Hu Y, Liu C, Zhu W K, Wei Z M, Liu J, Wang K Y 2023 ACS Nano 17 8411 Google Scholar
[13]	Zhao Z E, Tang W B, Zhang S H, Ding Y C, Zhao X F, Yuan G L 2023 J. Phys. Chem. C 127 4846 Google Scholar
[14]	王爱伟, 祝鲁平, 单衍苏, 刘鹏, 曹学蕾, 曹丙强 2024 73 058503 Google Scholar Wang A W, Zhu L P, Shan Y S, Liu P, Cao X L, Cao B Q 2024 Acta Phys. Sin. 73 058503 Google Scholar
[15]	Yan T T, Liu X Y, Zhang X Y, Hong E L, Wu L M, Fang X S 2023 Adv. Funct. Mater. 34 2311042 Google Scholar
[16]	Saleem M I, Sulaman M, Batool A, Bukhtiar A, Khalid S 2023 Energy Technol. 11 2300013 Google Scholar
[17]	Yuan B L, Wei H M, Li J W, Zhou Y, Xu F, Li J K, Cao B Q 2021 ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. 3 5592 Google Scholar
[18]	Ahirwar P, Kumar R 2023 Chem. Phys. Lett. 810 140180 Google Scholar
[19]	Bai T X Y, Wang S W., Bai L Y, Zhang K X., Chu C Y., Yi L X. 2022 Nanoscale Res. Lett. 17 69 Google Scholar
[20]	Yun K R, Lee T J, Kim S K, Kim J H, Seong T Y 2022 Adv. Opt. Mater. 11 2201974 Google Scholar
[21]	Mukhokosi E P, Maaza M 2022 J. Mater. Sci. 57 1555 Google Scholar
[22]	Sathyanarayana S, Krishnan K N, Das B C. 2024 Phys. Rev. Appl. 21 044015 Google Scholar
[23]	Cai J, Zhao T, Chen M M, Su J Y, Shen X M, Liu Y, Cao D W 2022 J. Phys. Chem. C 126 10007 Google Scholar
[24]	Zhou H P, Chen M W, Liu C G, Zhang R, Li J, Liao S A, Lu H F, Yang Y P 2023 Discover Nano 18 11 Google Scholar
[25]	Bhardwaj B, Bothra U, Singh S, Mills S, Ronningen T. J., Krishna S, Kabra D 2023 Appl. Phys. Rev. 10 021419 Google Scholar
[26]	Liu T, Li C, Yuan B L, Chen Y, Wei H M, Cao B Q 2022 Appl. Phys. Lett. 121 012102 Google Scholar
[27]	Alnuaimi A, Almansouri I, Nayfeh A 2016 J. Comput. Electron. 15 1110 Google Scholar
[28]	Wang T, Xiao J G, Sun R, Luo L B, Yi M X 2022 Chin. Phys. B 31 018801 Google Scholar
[29]	Luo X L, Hu Y, Lin Z H, Guo X, Zhang S Y, Shou C H, Hu Z S, Zhao X, Hao Y, Chang J J 2023 Solar RRL 7 2300081 Google Scholar
[30]	Liu X Y, Li S Y, Li Z Q, Cao F, Su L, Shtansky D V, Fang X S 2022 ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 14 48936 Google Scholar
[31]	胡紫婷, 舒鑫, 王香, 李跃, 徐闰, 洪峰, 马忠权, 蒋最敏, 徐飞 2022 71 116801 Google Scholar Hu Z T, Shu X, Wang X, Li Y, Xu R, Hong F, Ma Z Q, Jiang Z M, Xu F 2022 Acta Phys. Sin. 71 116801 Google Scholar
[32]	Li G X, Wang Y K, Huang L X, Sun W H 2022 J. Alloys Compd. 907 164432 Google Scholar
[33]	Wang S L, Li M Y, Song C Y, Zheng C L, Li J T, Li Z Y, Zhang Y T, Yao J Q 2023 Appl. Surf. Sci. 623 156983 Google Scholar
[34]	Yuan Y, Ji Z, Yan G H, Li Z W, Li J L, Kuang M, Jiang B Q, Zeng L L, Pan L K, Mai W J 2021 J. Mater. Sci. Technol. 75 39 Google Scholar
[35]	Wang H, Du Z T, Jiang X, Cao S, Zou B S, Zheng J J, Zhao J L 2024 ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 16 11694 Google Scholar
[36]	Hua F, Du X, Huang Z Y, Gu Y T, Wen J F, Liu F C, Chen J X, Tang T 2023 J. Opt. Soc. Am. B: Opt. Phys. 41 55 Google Scholar
[37]	Zhang T, Cai S Y, Liang N N, Gao Y L, Li Y P, Liu F C, Long L Z, Liu J 2023 Phys. Scr. 99 015526 Google Scholar
[38]	Su L X, Li T F, Zhu Y 2022 Opt. Express 30 23330 Google Scholar
[39]	Zhou H, Wang R, Zhang X H, Xiao B A, Shuang Z H, Wu D J, Qin P L 2023 IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 70 6435 Google Scholar

Cited By

图 1 (a) 不同结构MSM型CsPbBr₃薄膜光电探测器结构示意图; (b) 使用PLD制备的CsPbBr₃薄膜的XRD扫描图; (c) CsPbBr₃薄膜的紫外-可见吸收光谱图和荧光光谱图; (d) 平面MSM型CsPbBr₃薄膜光电探测器响应速度图; (e) 垂直MSM型CsPbBr₃薄膜光电探测器响应速度图; (f) 450 nm激光照射下, 垂直/平面MSM型CsPbBr₃薄膜光电探测器的光暗电流图

Figure 1. (a) Schematic diagram of MSM-type CsPbBr₃ thin film photodetectors with different structures; (b) XRD patterns of CsPbBr₃ thin films prepared using PLD; (c) UV-visible absorption spectrum and fluorescence spectrum of CsPbBr₃ thin film; (d) response time graph of planar MSM-type CsPbBr₃ thin film photodetector; (e) response time graph of vertical MSM-type CsPbBr₃ thin film photodetector; (f) photo-dark current graph of vertical/planar MSM-type CsPbBr₃ thin film photodetector under 450 nm laser illumination.

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

图 2 (a) CsPbBr₃薄膜裸漏的表面扫描电子显微镜(SEM)图; (b)旋涂的NiO_x薄膜表面SEM图; (c)旋涂的TiO₂薄膜表面SEM图; (d)旋涂的TiO₂薄膜断面SEM图; (e)如插图所示, –20 V偏压下, 与图(a), (b), 图(c)分别对应的器件电流-时间(I-T)曲线对比图

Figure 2. (a) Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM) image of the exposed surface of CsPbBr₃ thin film; (b) SEM image of the surface of spin-coated NiO_x thin film; (c) SEM image of the surface of spin-coated TiO₂ thin film; (d) cross-sectional SEM image of the spin-coated TiO₂ thin film; (e) as illustrated, comparison of the device current-time (I-T) curves under a –20 V bias corresponding to panels (a), (b), (c).

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

图 3 (a) 不同界面缺陷态密度下垂直结构CsPbBr₃薄膜光电探测器模拟暗电流曲线; (b) 加入一层NiO_x薄膜后, CsPbBr₃/NiO_x薄膜器件总电流、电子电流和空穴电流的模拟I-V曲线图; (c) 加入一层TiO₂薄膜后, CsPbBr₃/TiO₂薄膜器件总电流、电子电流和空穴电流的模拟I-V曲线图; (d)—(f) 与图(a), (b), (c)对应的光电探测器件内部电流分布图

Figure 3. (a) Simulated dark current curves of vertical structure CsPbBr₃ thin film photodetectors under different interface defect state densities; (b) after adding a layer of NiO_x, simulated I-V curves showing total current, electron current, and hole current for CsPbBr₃/NiO_x thin film devices; (c) after adding a layer of TiO₂, simulated I-V curves showing total current, electron current, and hole current for CsPbBr₃/TiO₂ thin film devices; (d)–(f) diagrams showing the distribution of internal current in photodetector devices corresponding to figures (a), (b), (c).

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

图 4 (a) CsPbBr₃薄膜的紫外光电子能谱图; (b) CsPbBr₃/NiO_x薄膜光电探测器的能带图; (c) CsPbBr₃/TiO₂薄膜光电探测器的能带图; (d) 450 nm光照, 在黑暗和不同光照强度下垂直MSM型CsPbBr₃薄膜光电探测器的I-V曲线图; (e) 450 nm光照, 在不同偏置电压下垂直MSM型CsPbBr₃薄膜光电探测器的I-T曲线图; (f) 垂直MSM型CsPbBr₃薄膜光电探测器的瞬态光响应曲线图

Figure 4. (a) Ultraviolet photoelectron spectroscopy of CsPbBr₃ thin films; (b) band diagram of CsPbBr₃/NiO_x thin film photodetectors; (c) band diagram of CsPbBr₃/TiO₂ thin film photodetectors; (d) I-V characteristics of vertical MSM-type CsPbBr₃ thin film photodetectors under 450 nm illumination, in darkness and at various light intensities; (e) I-T curves of vertical MSM-type CsPbBr₃ thin film photodetectors under 450 nm illumination at different bias voltages; (f) transient photocurrent response curves of vertical MSM-type CsPbBr₃ thin film photodetectors.

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

图 5 (a) 450 nm光照和–20 V偏置, 不同光照强度下垂直MSM型CsPbBr₃薄膜光电探测器的光电流的绝对值大小; (b) 不同光照强度下的开关比; (c) 不同光照强度下的响应度; (d) 不同光照强度下的探测率

Figure 5. (a) The absolute magnitude of the photocurrent in vertical MSM-type CsPbBr₃ thin film photodetectors under 450 nm illumination and a -20 V bias at different light intensities; (b) on/off ratio at different light intensities; (c) responsivity at different light intensities; (d) detectivity at different light intensities.

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

表 1 CsPbBr₃基薄膜光电探测器的性能对比

Table 1. Performance comparison of CsPbBr₃-based thin film photodetectors.

Detector	Structure	Dark current/(10^–10 A)	D*/(10⁹ Jones)	τ_rise/τ_fall/(ms/ms)	Ref.
CsPbBr₃NPLs/Ag	Planar	–0.37(–3 V)	9300	75/72	[35]
n-Si/CsPbBr₃/Au	Planar	0.003(0 V)	105	190/291	[36]
1D-TiO₂/0D-CsPbBr₃/Au	Planar	4(1 V)	1800	9348/5951	[37]
CsPbBr₃/ZnO	Vertical	–5(–5 V)	7	0.061/1.4	[38]
SnO₂/CsPbBr₃/Carbon	Vertical	330(0 V)	370	0.11/0.23	[39]
CsPbBr₃/TiO₂/Ag	Vertical	–0.0481(–1 V)	1160	0.063/0.162	This work

DownLoad: CSV

map

[1]	Xu J, Li J, Wang H S, He C Y, Li J L, Bao Y N, Tang H Y, Luo H D, Liu X C, Yang Y M 2021 Adv. Mater. Interfaces 9 2101487 Google Scholar
[2]	Zhang Y, Wu C Y, Zhou X Y, Li J C, Tao X Y, Liu B Y, Chen J W, Chang Y J, Tong G Q, Jiang Y 2023 Mater. Today Phys. 36 101179 Google Scholar
[3]	Liu X Y, Liu Z Y, Li J J, Tan X H, Sun B, Fang H, Xi S, Shi T L, Tang Z R, Liao G L 2020 J. Mater. Chem. C 8 3337 Google Scholar
[4]	Perumalveeramalai C, Zheng J, Wang Y, Guo H L, Pammi S. V. N., Mudike R, Li C B 2024 Chem. Eng. J. 492 152213 Google Scholar
[5]	Wang Y Z, Kublitski J, Xing S, Dollinger F, Spoltore D, Benduhn J, Leo K 2022 Mater. Horiz. 9 220 Google Scholar
[6]	Zheng J B, Yang D Z, Guo D C, Yang L Q, Li Ji, Ma D G 2023 ACS Photonics 10 1382 Google Scholar
[7]	Wang H D, Huang H X, Zha J J, et al. 2023 Adv. Opt. Mater. 11 2301508 Google Scholar
[8]	Gong W Q, Tian Y Z, Yan J, Gao F, Li L 2022 J. Mater. Chem. C 10 7460 Google Scholar
[9]	Qiao S, Liu J H, Wang R N, Guo L J, Wang S F, Pan A L, Pan C F 2023 Adv. Opt. Mater. 11 2300751 Google Scholar
[10]	Li X, Xiang Y, Wan J X, Xiao Z X, Yuan H, Sun J, Liu Y F, Dai G Z, Yang J L 2022 Org. Electron. 101 106409 Google Scholar
[11]	Zhu L P, Cheng X M, Wang A W, Shan Y S, Cao X L, Cao B Q 2023 Appl. Phys. Lett. 123 212105 Google Scholar
[12]	Hu T G, Zhao L X, Wang Y J, Lin H L, Xie S H, Hu Y, Liu C, Zhu W K, Wei Z M, Liu J, Wang K Y 2023 ACS Nano 17 8411 Google Scholar
[13]	Zhao Z E, Tang W B, Zhang S H, Ding Y C, Zhao X F, Yuan G L 2023 J. Phys. Chem. C 127 4846 Google Scholar
[14]	王爱伟, 祝鲁平, 单衍苏, 刘鹏, 曹学蕾, 曹丙强 2024 73 058503 Google Scholar Wang A W, Zhu L P, Shan Y S, Liu P, Cao X L, Cao B Q 2024 Acta Phys. Sin. 73 058503 Google Scholar
[15]	Yan T T, Liu X Y, Zhang X Y, Hong E L, Wu L M, Fang X S 2023 Adv. Funct. Mater. 34 2311042 Google Scholar
[16]	Saleem M I, Sulaman M, Batool A, Bukhtiar A, Khalid S 2023 Energy Technol. 11 2300013 Google Scholar
[17]	Yuan B L, Wei H M, Li J W, Zhou Y, Xu F, Li J K, Cao B Q 2021 ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. 3 5592 Google Scholar
[18]	Ahirwar P, Kumar R 2023 Chem. Phys. Lett. 810 140180 Google Scholar
[19]	Bai T X Y, Wang S W., Bai L Y, Zhang K X., Chu C Y., Yi L X. 2022 Nanoscale Res. Lett. 17 69 Google Scholar
[20]	Yun K R, Lee T J, Kim S K, Kim J H, Seong T Y 2022 Adv. Opt. Mater. 11 2201974 Google Scholar
[21]	Mukhokosi E P, Maaza M 2022 J. Mater. Sci. 57 1555 Google Scholar
[22]	Sathyanarayana S, Krishnan K N, Das B C. 2024 Phys. Rev. Appl. 21 044015 Google Scholar
[23]	Cai J, Zhao T, Chen M M, Su J Y, Shen X M, Liu Y, Cao D W 2022 J. Phys. Chem. C 126 10007 Google Scholar
[24]	Zhou H P, Chen M W, Liu C G, Zhang R, Li J, Liao S A, Lu H F, Yang Y P 2023 Discover Nano 18 11 Google Scholar
[25]	Bhardwaj B, Bothra U, Singh S, Mills S, Ronningen T. J., Krishna S, Kabra D 2023 Appl. Phys. Rev. 10 021419 Google Scholar
[26]	Liu T, Li C, Yuan B L, Chen Y, Wei H M, Cao B Q 2022 Appl. Phys. Lett. 121 012102 Google Scholar
[27]	Alnuaimi A, Almansouri I, Nayfeh A 2016 J. Comput. Electron. 15 1110 Google Scholar
[28]	Wang T, Xiao J G, Sun R, Luo L B, Yi M X 2022 Chin. Phys. B 31 018801 Google Scholar
[29]	Luo X L, Hu Y, Lin Z H, Guo X, Zhang S Y, Shou C H, Hu Z S, Zhao X, Hao Y, Chang J J 2023 Solar RRL 7 2300081 Google Scholar
[30]	Liu X Y, Li S Y, Li Z Q, Cao F, Su L, Shtansky D V, Fang X S 2022 ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 14 48936 Google Scholar
[31]	胡紫婷, 舒鑫, 王香, 李跃, 徐闰, 洪峰, 马忠权, 蒋最敏, 徐飞 2022 71 116801 Google Scholar Hu Z T, Shu X, Wang X, Li Y, Xu R, Hong F, Ma Z Q, Jiang Z M, Xu F 2022 Acta Phys. Sin. 71 116801 Google Scholar
[32]	Li G X, Wang Y K, Huang L X, Sun W H 2022 J. Alloys Compd. 907 164432 Google Scholar
[33]	Wang S L, Li M Y, Song C Y, Zheng C L, Li J T, Li Z Y, Zhang Y T, Yao J Q 2023 Appl. Surf. Sci. 623 156983 Google Scholar
[34]	Yuan Y, Ji Z, Yan G H, Li Z W, Li J L, Kuang M, Jiang B Q, Zeng L L, Pan L K, Mai W J 2021 J. Mater. Sci. Technol. 75 39 Google Scholar
[35]	Wang H, Du Z T, Jiang X, Cao S, Zou B S, Zheng J J, Zhao J L 2024 ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 16 11694 Google Scholar
[36]	Hua F, Du X, Huang Z Y, Gu Y T, Wen J F, Liu F C, Chen J X, Tang T 2023 J. Opt. Soc. Am. B: Opt. Phys. 41 55 Google Scholar
[37]	Zhang T, Cai S Y, Liang N N, Gao Y L, Li Y P, Liu F C, Long L Z, Liu J 2023 Phys. Scr. 99 015526 Google Scholar
[38]	Su L X, Li T F, Zhu Y 2022 Opt. Express 30 23330 Google Scholar
[39]	Zhou H, Wang R, Zhang X H, Xiao B A, Shuang Z H, Wu D J, Qin P L 2023 IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 70 6435 Google Scholar

[1]	Sun Tang-You, Yu Yan-Li, Qin Zu-Bin, Chen Zan-Hui, Chen Jun-Li, Jiang Yue, Zhang Fa-Bi. Multi-band response Cs₂AgBiBr₆ double perovskite photodetector based on TiO₂ nanopillars. Acta Physica Sinica, 2024, 73(7): 078502. doi: 10.7498/aps.73.20231919
[2]	Su Ran, Xi Zhao-Ying, Li Shan, Zhang Jia-Han, Jiang Ming-Ming, Liu Zeng, Tang Wei-Hua. GaSe/β-Ga₂O₃ heterojunction based self-powered solar-blind ultraviolet photoelectric detector. Acta Physica Sinica, 2024, 73(11): 118502. doi: 10.7498/aps.73.20240267
[3]	Wang Ai-Wei, Zhu Lu-Ping, Shan Yan-Su, Liu Peng, Cao Xue-Lei, Cao Bing-Qiang. High-performance CsSnBr₃/Si PN heterojunction photodetectors prepared by pulsed laser deposition epitaxy. Acta Physica Sinica, 2024, 73(5): 058503. doi: 10.7498/aps.73.20231645
[4]	Wang Fei, Yang Zhen-Qing, Xia Yu-Hong, Liu Chang, Lin Chun-Dan. Nonadiabatic molecular dynamics study on effect of Ge/Sn alloy on hot carrier relaxation of CsPbBr₃ perovskite. Acta Physica Sinica, 2024, 73(2): 028801. doi: 10.7498/aps.73.20231061
[5]	Zhang Xi-Sheng, Yan Chun-Yu, Hu Li-Na, Wang Jing-Zhou, Yao Chen-Zhong. Perovskite solar cells prepared by processing CsPbBr₃ nanocrystalline films in low temperature solution. Acta Physica Sinica, 2024, 73(22): 228101. doi: 10.7498/aps.73.20241152
[6]	Zhao Ji-Yu, Tan Qiu-Hong, Liu Lei, Yang Wei-Ye, Wang Qian-Jin, Liu Ying-Kai. High-performance photodetectors based on Au nanoislands decorated CdSSe nanobelt. Acta Physica Sinica, 2023, 72(9): 098103. doi: 10.7498/aps.72.20222021
[7]	Liu Xiao-Xuan, Sun Fei-Yang, Wu Ying, Yang Sheng-Yi, Zou Bing-Suo. Research progress of silicon nanowires array photodetectors. Acta Physica Sinica, 2023, 72(6): 068501. doi: 10.7498/aps.72.20222303
[8]	Yang Mei-Li, Zou Li, Cheng Jia-Jie, Wang Jia-Ming, Jiang Yu-Fan, Hao Hui-Ying, Xing Jie, Liu Hao, Fan Zhen-Jun, Dong Jing-Jing. Improvement of performance of CsPbBr₃ perovskite solar cells by polyvinylidene fluoride additive. Acta Physica Sinica, 2023, 72(16): 168101. doi: 10.7498/aps.72.20230636
[9]	Hu Zi-Ting, Shu Xin, Wang Xiang, Li Yue, Xu Run, Hong Feng, Ma Zhong-Quan, Jiang Zui-Min, Xu Fei. Air-stable CsPbIBr₂ photodetector via dual-ligand-assisted solution strategy. Acta Physica Sinica, 2022, 71(11): 116801. doi: 10.7498/aps.71.20212143
[10]	Zhong Ting-Ting, Zhang Chen, Shindume Lomboleni Hamukwaya, Xu Wang-Shu, Tang Kun-Peng, Xu Xiang, Sun Wen-Tian, Hao Hui-Ying, Dong Jing-Jing, Liu Hao, Xing Jie. Efficient and stable carbon-based CsPbBr₃ solar cells added with PEABr additive. Acta Physica Sinica, 2022, 71(2): 028101. doi: 10.7498/aps.71.20211344
[11]	Ma Shu-Peng, Lin Fei-Yu, Luo Yuan, Zhu Liu, Guo Xue-Yi, Yang Ying. Formation mechanism of CsPbBr₃ in multi-step spin-coating process. Acta Physica Sinica, 2022, 71(15): 158101. doi: 10.7498/aps.71.20220171
[12]	Shu Yan-Tao, Zhang You-Wei, Wang Shun. Photodetectors based on homojunctions of transition metal dichalcogenides. Acta Physica Sinica, 2021, 70(17): 177301. doi: 10.7498/aps.70.20210859
[13]	Zhao Yi-Mo, Huang Zhi-Wei, Peng Ren-Miao, Xu Peng-Peng, Wu Qiang, Mao Yi-Chen, Yu Chun-Yu, Huang Wei, Wang Jian-Yuan, Chen Song-Yan, Li Cheng. Indium tin oxid/germanium Schottky photodetectors modulated by ultra-thin dielectric intercalation. Acta Physica Sinica, 2021, 70(17): 178506. doi: 10.7498/aps.70.20210138
[14]	Lu Zi-Qing, Han Qin, Ye Han, Wang Shuai, Xiao Feng, Xiao Fan. Low dark current and high bandwidth evanescent wave coupled PIN photodetector array for 400 Gbit/s receiving system. Acta Physica Sinica, 2021, 70(20): 208501. doi: 10.7498/aps.70.20210781
[15]	Meng Xian-Cheng, Tian He, An Xia, Yuan Shuo, Fan Chao, Wang Meng-Jun, Zheng Hong-Xing. Field effect transistor photodetector based on two dimensional SnSe₂. Acta Physica Sinica, 2020, 69(13): 137801. doi: 10.7498/aps.69.20191960
[16]	An Tao, Tu Chuan-Bao, Gong Wei. Organic color photodetectors based on tri-phase bulk heterojunction with wide sectrum and photoelectronic mltiplication. Acta Physica Sinica, 2018, 67(19): 198503. doi: 10.7498/aps.67.20180502
[17]	Zheng Jia-Jin, Wang Ya-Ru, Yu Ke-Han, Xu Xiang-Xing, Sheng Xue-Xi, Hu Er-Tao, Wei Wei. Field effect transistor photodetector based on graphene and perovskite quantum dots. Acta Physica Sinica, 2018, 67(11): 118502. doi: 10.7498/aps.67.20180129
[18]	Wang Chen, Xu Yi-Hong, Li Cheng, Lin Hai-Jun. Fabrication and characteristics of high performance SOI-based Ge PIN waveguide photodetector. Acta Physica Sinica, 2017, 66(19): 198502. doi: 10.7498/aps.66.198502
[19]	Guo Jian-Chuan, Zuo Yu-Hua, Zhang Yun, Zhang Ling-Zi, Cheng Bu-Wen, Wang Qi-Ming. Theoretical analysis and experimental study of the space-charge-screening effect in uni-traveling-carrier photodiode. Acta Physica Sinica, 2010, 59(7): 4524-4529. doi: 10.7498/aps.59.4524
[20]	Xiong Chuan-Bing, Jiang Feng-Yi, Wang Li, Fang Wen-Qing, Mo Chun-Lan. The investigation on the interference phenomenon in electroluminescence spectrum of vertical structured InGaAlN multiple quantum well light-emitting diodes. Acta Physica Sinica, 2008, 57(12): 7860-7864. doi: 10.7498/aps.57.7860

20-20241075Suppl.pdf

Catalog

Vol. 73, Issue 20 - 2024-10-20

Metrics

Abstract views: 1441
PDF Downloads: 142
Cited By: 0

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

Search

Article

留言板

Vertical MSM-type CsPbBr₃ thin film photodetectors with fast response speed and low dark current

Abstract

Authors and contacts

Corresponding author: Cao Bing-Qiang, mse_caobq@ujn.edu.cn

FullText HTML : translate this paragraph

Supplements

References

Cited By

Catalog

Metrics

Authors

Referees

About Journal

About

Search

Article

留言板

Vertical MSM-type CsPbBr3 thin film photodetectors with fast response speed and low dark current

Abstract

Authors and contacts

Corresponding author: Cao Bing-Qiang, mse_caobq@ujn.edu.cn

FullText HTML : translate this paragraph

Supplements

References

Cited By

Catalog

Metrics

Publishing process

Authors

Referees

About Journal

About

Vertical MSM-type CsPbBr₃ thin film photodetectors with fast response speed and low dark current