Search

Article

x

留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

Hardness prediction of WC-Co cemented carbide based on machine learning model

Song Rui Liu Xue-Mei Wang Hai-Bin Lü Hao Song Xiao-Yan

Citation:

Hardness prediction of WC-Co cemented carbide based on machine learning model

Song Rui, Liu Xue-Mei, Wang Hai-Bin, Lü Hao, Song Xiao-Yan
科大讯飞翻译 (iFLYTEK Translation)
PDF
HTML
Get Citation
  • The hardness of cemented carbides is a fundamental property that plays a significant role in their design, preparation, and application evaluation. This study aims to identify the critical factors affecting the hardness of WC-Co cemented carbides and develop a high-throughput predictive model for hardness. A dataset consisting of raw material composition, sintering parameters and characterization results of cemented carbides is constructed in which the hardness of cemented carbide is set as the target variable. By analyzing the Pearson correlation coefficient, Shapley additive explanations (SHAP) results, WC grain size and Co content are determined to be the key characteristics influencing the hardness of cemented carbide. Subsequently, machine learning models such as support vector regression (SVR), polynomial regression (PR), gradient boosting decision tree (GBDT), and random forest (RF) are optimized to construct prediction models for hardness. Evaluations using 10-fold cross-validation demonstrate that the GBDT algorithm model exhibits the highest accuracy and strong generalization capability, making it most suitable for predicting and analyzing the hardness of cemented carbides. Based on predictions from GBDT algorithm model, PR algorithm model is established to achieve high-precision interpretable prediction of the hardness of cemented carbides. As a result, a quantitative relationship between hardness and Co content and WC grain size is obtained, demonstrating that reducing grain size and Co content is the key to obtaining high hardness of cemented carbide. This research provides a data-driven method for accurately and efficiently predicting cemented carbide properties, presenting valuable insights for the design and development of high-performance cemented carbide materials.
      Corresponding author: Liu Xue-Mei, liuxuemei@bjut.edu.cn ; Song Xiao-Yan, xysong@bjut.edu.cn
    • Funds: Project supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 52271085, 92163107, 52171061).
    [1]

    丁业章, 叶寅, 李多生, 徐锋, 朗文昌, 刘俊红, 温鑫 2023 72 068703Google Scholar

    Ding Y Z, Ye Y, Li D S, Xu F, Lang W C, Liu J H, Wen X 2023 Acta Phys. Sin. 72 068703Google Scholar

    [2]

    Useldinger R, Schleinkofer U 2017 Int. J. Refract. Met. Hard Mater. 62 170Google Scholar

    [3]

    Springs G E 1995 Int. J. Refract. Met. Hard Mater. 13 241Google Scholar

    [4]

    Ghasali E, Orooji Y, Tahamtan H, Asadian K, Alizadeh M, Ebadzadeh T 2020 Ceram. Int. 46 29199Google Scholar

    [5]

    Ezquerra B L, Lozada L, Berg H V D, Wolf M, Sánchez J M 2018 Int. J. Refract. Met. Hard Mater. 72 89Google Scholar

    [6]

    Sun L, Yang T E, Jia C C, Xiong J 2011 Int. J. Refract. Met. Hard Mater. 29 147Google Scholar

    [7]

    Ding Q J, Zheng Y, Ke Z, Zhang G T, Wu H, Xu X Y, Lu X P, Zhu X G 2020 Int. J. Refract. Met. Hard Mater. 87 105166Google Scholar

    [8]

    Hu H X, Liu X M, Chen J H, Lu H, Liu C, Wang H B, Luan J H, Jiao Z B, Liu Y, Song X Y 2022 J. Mater. Sci. Technol. 104 8Google Scholar

    [9]

    Yu S B, Min F L, Ying G B, Noudem J G, Liu S J, Zhang J F 2021 Mater. Charact. 180 111386Google Scholar

    [10]

    Tang Y Y, Wang S N, Xu F Y, Hong Y K, Luo X, He S M, Chen L Y, Zhong Z Q, Chen H, Xu G Z, Yang Q M 2021 J. Alloy Compd. 882 160638Google Scholar

    [11]

    Jafari M, Enayati M H, Salehi M, Nahvi S M, Park C G 2014 Ceram. Int. 40 11031Google Scholar

    [12]

    Wang H, Zeng M Q, Liu J W, Lu Z C, Shi Z H, Ouyang L Z, Zhu M 2015 Int. J. Refract. Met. Hard Mater. 48 97Google Scholar

    [13]

    Singla G, Singh K, Pandey O P 2014 Ceram. Int. 40 5157Google Scholar

    [14]

    Liu W H, Wu Y, He J Y, Nieh T G, Lu Z P 2013 Scripta Mater. 68 526Google Scholar

    [15]

    Liu X M, Song X Y, Wei C B, Gao Y, Wang H B 2012 Scripta Mater. 66 825Google Scholar

    [16]

    Song X Y, Gao Y, Liu X M, Wei C B, Wang H B, Xu W W 2013 Acta Mater. 61 2154Google Scholar

    [17]

    Bonache V, Salvador M D, Fernández A, Borrell A 2011 Int. J. Refract. Met. Hard Mater. 29 202Google Scholar

    [18]

    Fang Z , Maheshwari P, Wang X, Sohn H Y, Griffo A, Riley R 2005 Int. J. Refract. Met. Hard Mater. 23 249Google Scholar

    [19]

    Fang Z Z, Wang X, Ryu T, Hwang K S, Sohn H Y 2009 Int. J. Refract. Met. Hard Mater. 27 288Google Scholar

    [20]

    Liu K, Wang Z H, Yin Z B, Cao L Y, Yuan J T 2018 Ceram. Int. 44 18711Google Scholar

    [21]

    赵世贤, 宋晓艳, 刘雪梅, 魏崇斌, 王海滨, 高杨 2011 金属学报 47 1188Google Scholar

    Zhao S X, Song X Y, Liu X M, Wei C B, Wang H B, Gao Y 2011 Acta Metall. Sin. 47 1188Google Scholar

    [22]

    Roy A, Babuska T, Krick B, Balasubramanian G 2020 Scripta Mater. 185 152Google Scholar

    [23]

    Chanda B, Jana P P, Das J 2021 Comp. Mater. Sci. 197 110619Google Scholar

    [24]

    George K, Haoyan D, Chanho L, Samaei A T, Tu P, Maarten J, Ke A, Dong M, Peter K L, Wei C 2019 Acta Mater. 181 124Google Scholar

    [25]

    Bakr M, Syarif J, Hashem I A T 2022 Mater. Today. Commun. 31 103407Google Scholar

    [26]

    Ozerdem M S, Kolukisa S 2009 Mater. Design 30 764Google Scholar

    [27]

    Sun Y, Zeng W D, Han Y F, Ma X, Zhao Y Q, Guo P, Wang G, Dargusch M S 2012 Comp. Mater. Sci. 60 239Google Scholar

    [28]

    Zhang X Y, Dong R F, Guo Q W, Hou H, Zhao Y H 2023 J. Mater. Res. Technol. 26 4813Google Scholar

    [29]

    Catal A A, Bedir E, Yilmaz R, Swider M A, Lee C, El-Atwani O, Maier H J, Ozdemir H C, Canadinc D 2024 Comp. Mater. Sci. 231 112612Google Scholar

    [30]

    Guan Z H, Tian H X, Li N, Long J Z, Zhang W B, Du Y 2023 Ceram. Int. 49 613Google Scholar

    [31]

    Guan Z H, Li N, Zhang W B, Wang J J, Wang C B, Shen Q, Xu Z G, Peng J, Du Y 2022 Int. J. Refract. Met. Hard Mater. 104 105798Google Scholar

    [32]

    Rahadian H, Bandong S, Widyotriatmo A, Joelianto E 2023 Alex. Eng. J. 82 304Google Scholar

    [33]

    Zhong L, Guo X, Ding M, Ye Y C, Jiang Y F, Zhu Q, Li J L 2024 Comput. Electron. Agr. 217 108627Google Scholar

    [34]

    Someh N G, Pishvaee M S, Sadjadi S J, Soltani R 2020 J. Eval. Clin. Pract. 26 1498Google Scholar

    [35]

    Cervantes J, Lamont F G, Mazahua L R, Lopez A 2020 Neurocomputing 408 189Google Scholar

    [36]

    Tsai C Y, Kim J, Jin F, Jun M, Cheong M, Yammarino F J 2022 Leadership Quart. 33 101592Google Scholar

    [37]

    Khakurel H, Tanfique M F N, Roy A, Balasubramanian G, Ouyang G, Cui J, Johson D D, Devanathan R 2021 Sci. Rep. 1117149Google Scholar

    [38]

    Genuer R, Poggi J M, Malot C T, Vialaneix N V 2017 Big Data Res. 9 28Google Scholar

  • 图 1  WC-Co硬质合金硬度预测的机器学习模型构建流程图

    Figure 1.  Hardness prediction workflow of WC-Co cemented carbides based on ML.

    图 2  影响硬质合金硬度特征之间的皮尔逊线性相关系数

    Figure 2.  Pearson linear correlation coefficient of among the influence features on the hardness of cemented carbides.

    图 3  目标变量为硬度时各特征SHAP值(a)和各特征平均SHAP的绝对值(b)的排序

    Figure 3.  SHAP values (a) and the absolute value of average SHAP (b) of each feature with target variable of hardness.

    图 4  典型参数对GBDT算法模型的测试集准确率(R2)、偏差(Bias)和方差(Var)的影响 (a) 弱学习器数量; (b) 树的最大深度; (c) 叶子节点最少样本数; (d) 内部节点再划分所需最小样本数

    Figure 4.  Performance of typical parameters on the testing set in terms of accuracy (R2)、bias (Bias) and variance (Var) based on GBDT model: (a) Number of estimator; (b) max depth; (c) min sample leaf; (d) min sample split.

    图 5  四种算法模型训练集学习效果 (a) SVR算法; (b) PR算法; (c) GBDT算法; (d) RF算法

    Figure 5.  Performance of four models on training set: (a) SVR algorithm; (b) PR algorithm; (c) GBDT algorithm; (d) RF algorithm.

    图 6  四种算法模型测试集学习效果 (a) SVR算法; (b) PR算法; (c) GBDT算法; (d) RF算法

    Figure 6.  Performance of four models on testing set: (a) SVR algorithm; (b) PR algorithm; (c) GBDT algorithm; (d) RF algorithm.

    图 7  不同机器学习算法模型测试集效果对比 (a) MSE和MAE; (b) 经10次10折交叉验证得到的R2

    Figure 7.  Performance of different machine learning algorithms on testing set: (a) MSE and MAE; (b) and R2 score by 10-fold cross-validation.

    图 8  硬质合金硬度随WC晶粒尺寸和Co含量的变化 (a) 原始数据; (b) GBDT模型预测

    Figure 8.  Hardness of cemented carbides as a function of WC grain size and Co content: (a) Original data; (b) data predicted by GBDT model.

    图 9  PR算法模型训练及预测效果的评估 (a) 训练集与测试集预测的MAE, MSE; (b) PR算法模型测试集预测准确率

    Figure 9.  Evaluation of the PR model: (a) MSE and MAE for the training and testing sets; (b) R2 for the testing set.

    图 10  PR算法模型的硬质合金硬度预测结果 (a) 硬度随WC晶粒尺寸、Co含量变化的三维图; (b) 硬度在WC晶粒尺寸和Co含量构成平面上的投影图

    Figure 10.  Hardness of cemented carbides predicted by the PR model: (a) Hardness varing with WC grain size and Co content; (b) hardness projection on the plane of WC grain size and Co content.

    图 11  硬度大于1800 kgf/mm2区域的硬质合金硬度预测结果 (a) 硬度随WC晶粒尺寸的变化; (b) 硬度随Co含量的变化

    Figure 11.  Prediction of hardness in a range of hardness higher than 1800 kgf/mm2: (a) Hardness varying with WC grain size; (b) hardness varying with Co content.

    图 12  不同WC晶粒尺寸下硬度变化率随Co含量的变化

    Figure 12.  Hardness slope with different variables with Co content under different WC grain size.

    Baidu
  • [1]

    丁业章, 叶寅, 李多生, 徐锋, 朗文昌, 刘俊红, 温鑫 2023 72 068703Google Scholar

    Ding Y Z, Ye Y, Li D S, Xu F, Lang W C, Liu J H, Wen X 2023 Acta Phys. Sin. 72 068703Google Scholar

    [2]

    Useldinger R, Schleinkofer U 2017 Int. J. Refract. Met. Hard Mater. 62 170Google Scholar

    [3]

    Springs G E 1995 Int. J. Refract. Met. Hard Mater. 13 241Google Scholar

    [4]

    Ghasali E, Orooji Y, Tahamtan H, Asadian K, Alizadeh M, Ebadzadeh T 2020 Ceram. Int. 46 29199Google Scholar

    [5]

    Ezquerra B L, Lozada L, Berg H V D, Wolf M, Sánchez J M 2018 Int. J. Refract. Met. Hard Mater. 72 89Google Scholar

    [6]

    Sun L, Yang T E, Jia C C, Xiong J 2011 Int. J. Refract. Met. Hard Mater. 29 147Google Scholar

    [7]

    Ding Q J, Zheng Y, Ke Z, Zhang G T, Wu H, Xu X Y, Lu X P, Zhu X G 2020 Int. J. Refract. Met. Hard Mater. 87 105166Google Scholar

    [8]

    Hu H X, Liu X M, Chen J H, Lu H, Liu C, Wang H B, Luan J H, Jiao Z B, Liu Y, Song X Y 2022 J. Mater. Sci. Technol. 104 8Google Scholar

    [9]

    Yu S B, Min F L, Ying G B, Noudem J G, Liu S J, Zhang J F 2021 Mater. Charact. 180 111386Google Scholar

    [10]

    Tang Y Y, Wang S N, Xu F Y, Hong Y K, Luo X, He S M, Chen L Y, Zhong Z Q, Chen H, Xu G Z, Yang Q M 2021 J. Alloy Compd. 882 160638Google Scholar

    [11]

    Jafari M, Enayati M H, Salehi M, Nahvi S M, Park C G 2014 Ceram. Int. 40 11031Google Scholar

    [12]

    Wang H, Zeng M Q, Liu J W, Lu Z C, Shi Z H, Ouyang L Z, Zhu M 2015 Int. J. Refract. Met. Hard Mater. 48 97Google Scholar

    [13]

    Singla G, Singh K, Pandey O P 2014 Ceram. Int. 40 5157Google Scholar

    [14]

    Liu W H, Wu Y, He J Y, Nieh T G, Lu Z P 2013 Scripta Mater. 68 526Google Scholar

    [15]

    Liu X M, Song X Y, Wei C B, Gao Y, Wang H B 2012 Scripta Mater. 66 825Google Scholar

    [16]

    Song X Y, Gao Y, Liu X M, Wei C B, Wang H B, Xu W W 2013 Acta Mater. 61 2154Google Scholar

    [17]

    Bonache V, Salvador M D, Fernández A, Borrell A 2011 Int. J. Refract. Met. Hard Mater. 29 202Google Scholar

    [18]

    Fang Z , Maheshwari P, Wang X, Sohn H Y, Griffo A, Riley R 2005 Int. J. Refract. Met. Hard Mater. 23 249Google Scholar

    [19]

    Fang Z Z, Wang X, Ryu T, Hwang K S, Sohn H Y 2009 Int. J. Refract. Met. Hard Mater. 27 288Google Scholar

    [20]

    Liu K, Wang Z H, Yin Z B, Cao L Y, Yuan J T 2018 Ceram. Int. 44 18711Google Scholar

    [21]

    赵世贤, 宋晓艳, 刘雪梅, 魏崇斌, 王海滨, 高杨 2011 金属学报 47 1188Google Scholar

    Zhao S X, Song X Y, Liu X M, Wei C B, Wang H B, Gao Y 2011 Acta Metall. Sin. 47 1188Google Scholar

    [22]

    Roy A, Babuska T, Krick B, Balasubramanian G 2020 Scripta Mater. 185 152Google Scholar

    [23]

    Chanda B, Jana P P, Das J 2021 Comp. Mater. Sci. 197 110619Google Scholar

    [24]

    George K, Haoyan D, Chanho L, Samaei A T, Tu P, Maarten J, Ke A, Dong M, Peter K L, Wei C 2019 Acta Mater. 181 124Google Scholar

    [25]

    Bakr M, Syarif J, Hashem I A T 2022 Mater. Today. Commun. 31 103407Google Scholar

    [26]

    Ozerdem M S, Kolukisa S 2009 Mater. Design 30 764Google Scholar

    [27]

    Sun Y, Zeng W D, Han Y F, Ma X, Zhao Y Q, Guo P, Wang G, Dargusch M S 2012 Comp. Mater. Sci. 60 239Google Scholar

    [28]

    Zhang X Y, Dong R F, Guo Q W, Hou H, Zhao Y H 2023 J. Mater. Res. Technol. 26 4813Google Scholar

    [29]

    Catal A A, Bedir E, Yilmaz R, Swider M A, Lee C, El-Atwani O, Maier H J, Ozdemir H C, Canadinc D 2024 Comp. Mater. Sci. 231 112612Google Scholar

    [30]

    Guan Z H, Tian H X, Li N, Long J Z, Zhang W B, Du Y 2023 Ceram. Int. 49 613Google Scholar

    [31]

    Guan Z H, Li N, Zhang W B, Wang J J, Wang C B, Shen Q, Xu Z G, Peng J, Du Y 2022 Int. J. Refract. Met. Hard Mater. 104 105798Google Scholar

    [32]

    Rahadian H, Bandong S, Widyotriatmo A, Joelianto E 2023 Alex. Eng. J. 82 304Google Scholar

    [33]

    Zhong L, Guo X, Ding M, Ye Y C, Jiang Y F, Zhu Q, Li J L 2024 Comput. Electron. Agr. 217 108627Google Scholar

    [34]

    Someh N G, Pishvaee M S, Sadjadi S J, Soltani R 2020 J. Eval. Clin. Pract. 26 1498Google Scholar

    [35]

    Cervantes J, Lamont F G, Mazahua L R, Lopez A 2020 Neurocomputing 408 189Google Scholar

    [36]

    Tsai C Y, Kim J, Jin F, Jun M, Cheong M, Yammarino F J 2022 Leadership Quart. 33 101592Google Scholar

    [37]

    Khakurel H, Tanfique M F N, Roy A, Balasubramanian G, Ouyang G, Cui J, Johson D D, Devanathan R 2021 Sci. Rep. 1117149Google Scholar

    [38]

    Genuer R, Poggi J M, Malot C T, Vialaneix N V 2017 Big Data Res. 9 28Google Scholar

  • [1] GUO Yan, LYU Heng, DING Chunling, YUAN Chenzhi, JIN Ruibo. Machine learning identification of fractional-order vortex beam diffraction process. Acta Physica Sinica, 2025, 74(1): 014203. doi: 10.7498/aps.74.20241458
    [2] ZHANG Tong, WANG Jiahao, TIAN Shuai, SUN Xuran, LI Ri. Machine learning-based study of dynamic shrinkage behavior during solidification of castings. Acta Physica Sinica, 2025, 74(2): 028103. doi: 10.7498/aps.74.20241581
    [3] WANG Peng, MAIMAITINIYAZI Maimaitiabudula. Quantum Dynamics of Machine Learning. Acta Physica Sinica, 2025, 74(6): . doi: 10.7498/aps.74.20240999
    [4] Zhang Xu, Ding Jin-Min, Hou Chen-Yang, Zhao Yi-Ming, Liu Hong-Wei, Liang Sheng. Machine learning based laser homogenization method. Acta Physica Sinica, 2024, 73(16): 164205. doi: 10.7498/aps.73.20240747
    [5] Zhang Jia-Hui. Machine learning for in silico protein research. Acta Physica Sinica, 2024, 73(6): 069301. doi: 10.7498/aps.73.20231618
    [6] Zhang Qiao, Tan Wei, Ning Yong-Qi, Nie Guo-Zheng, Cai Meng-Qiu, Wang Jun-Nian, Zhu Hui-Ping, Zhao Yu-Qing. Prediction of magnetic Janus materials based on machine learning and first-principles calculations. Acta Physica Sinica, 2024, 73(23): 230201. doi: 10.7498/aps.73.20241278
    [7] Guo Wei-Chen, Ai Bao-Quan, He Liang. Reveal flocking phase transition of self-propelled active particles by machine learning regression uncertainty. Acta Physica Sinica, 2023, 72(20): 200701. doi: 10.7498/aps.72.20230896
    [8] Liu Ye, Niu He-Ran, Li Bing-Bing, Ma Xin-Hua, Cui Shu-Wang. Application of machine learning in cosmic ray particle identification. Acta Physica Sinica, 2023, 72(14): 140202. doi: 10.7498/aps.72.20230334
    [9] Guan Xing-Yue, Huang Heng-Yan, Peng Hua-Qi, Liu Yan-Hang, Li Wen-Fei, Wang Wei. Machine learning in molecular simulations of biomolecules. Acta Physica Sinica, 2023, 72(24): 248708. doi: 10.7498/aps.72.20231624
    [10] Ding Ye-Zhang, Ye Yin, Li Duo-Sheng, Xu Feng, Lang Wen-Chang, Liu Jun-Hong, Wen Xin. Molecular dynamics simulation of graphene deposition and growth on WC-Co cemented carbides. Acta Physica Sinica, 2023, 72(6): 068703. doi: 10.7498/aps.72.20221332
    [11] Yang Zhang-Zhang, Liu Li, Wan Zhi-Tao, Fu Jia, Fan Qun-Chao, Xie Feng, Zhang Yi, Ma Jie. Combining machine learning algorithm to improve prediction performance of ab initio method for vibrational energy spectra of HF/HBr/H35Cl/Na35Cl. Acta Physica Sinica, 2023, 72(7): 073101. doi: 10.7498/aps.72.20221953
    [12] Zhang Yi-Fan, Ren Wei, Wang Wei-Li, Ding Shu-Jian, Li Nan, Chang Liang, Zhou Qian. Machine learning combined with solid solution strengthening model for predicting hardness of high entropy alloys. Acta Physica Sinica, 2023, 72(18): 180701. doi: 10.7498/aps.72.20230646
    [13] Zhang Jia-Wei, Yao Hong-Bo, Zhang Yuan-Zheng, Jiang Wei-Bo, Wu Yong-Hui, Zhang Ya-Ju, Ao Tian-Yong, Zheng Hai-Wu. Self-powered sensing based on triboelectric nanogenerator through machine learning and its application. Acta Physica Sinica, 2022, 71(7): 078702. doi: 10.7498/aps.71.20211632
    [14] Li Wei, Long Lian-Chun, Liu Jing-Yi, Yang Yang. Classification of magnetic ground states and prediction of magnetic moments of inorganic magnetic materials based on machine learning. Acta Physica Sinica, 2022, 71(6): 060202. doi: 10.7498/aps.71.20211625
    [15] Lin Jian, Ye Meng, Zhu Jia-Wei, Li Xiao-Peng. Machine learning assisted quantum adiabatic algorithm design. Acta Physica Sinica, 2021, 70(14): 140306. doi: 10.7498/aps.70.20210831
    [16] Chen Jiang-Zhi, Yang Chen-Wen, Ren Jie. Machine learning based on wave and diffusion physical systems. Acta Physica Sinica, 2021, 70(14): 144204. doi: 10.7498/aps.70.20210879
    [17] Yang Zi-Xin, Gao Zhang-Ran, Sun Xiao-Fan, Cai Hong-Ling, Zhang Feng-Ming, Wu Xiao-Shan. High critical transition temperature of lead-based perovskite ferroelectric crystals: A machine learning study. Acta Physica Sinica, 2019, 68(21): 210502. doi: 10.7498/aps.68.20190942
    [18] Man Tian-Nan, Zhang Lin, Xiang Zhao-Long, Wang Wen-Bin, Gao Jian-Wen, Wang En-Gang. Effects of adding Ti on microstructure and properties of Al-Bi immiscible alloy. Acta Physica Sinica, 2018, 67(3): 036101. doi: 10.7498/aps.67.20172256
    [19] Yang Neng-Wu, Peng Wen-Yi, Yan Ming-Ming, Wang Wei-Wei, Shi Hai-Ping. Influence of aging time on mechanical properties and microstructures of FeNiAlTa shape memory alloy. Acta Physica Sinica, 2013, 62(15): 158106. doi: 10.7498/aps.62.158106
    [20] Yang Hai-Bo, Hu Ming, Zhang Wei, Zhang Xu-Rui, Li De-Jun, Wang Ming-Xia. Nanoindentation investigation of the hardness and Young’s modulus of porous silicon depending on microstructure. Acta Physica Sinica, 2007, 56(7): 4032-4038. doi: 10.7498/aps.56.4032
Metrics
  • Abstract views:  2557
  • PDF Downloads:  58
  • Cited By: 0
Publishing process
  • Received Date:  22 February 2024
  • Accepted Date:  15 April 2024
  • Available Online:  29 April 2024
  • Published Online:  20 June 2024

/

返回文章
返回
Baidu
map