-
The strong piezoelectric field in InGaN/GaN heterostructure quantum wells severely reduces the light emission efficiency of multiple quantum well (MQW) structures. To address this issue, a strain modulation interlayer is commonly used to mitigate the piezoelectric polarization field and improve the luminescence performance of the devices. To investigate the influence and mechanism of strain modulation in the InGaN/GaN superlattice (SL), epitaxial wafers with an n-type InGaN/GaN SL interlayer sample, and their corresponding control samples are prepared. The measured temperature-dependent photoluminescence (PL) spectra of the epitaxial wafers, show that the introduction of an SL interlayer leads to a shorter-wavelength emission and enhancement of internal quantum efficiency. As the temperature increases, a blue shift of the PL peak is observed. However, for the sample with an SL interlayer, the blue shift of the PL peak with temperature increasing is relatively small. Electroluminescence (EL) experiments indicate that the introduction of an SL interlayer significantly increases the integrated intensity of the EL peak and reduces its full width at half maximum. These phenomena collectively indicate that the incorporation of a superlattice interlayer can partly suppress the quantum-confined Stark effect (QCSE) that affects the light emission efficiency. Theoretical calculations show that the introduction of a superlattice strain layer before growing an active multiple quantum well can weaken the polarization-induced built-in electric field in the active quantum well, reduce the tilt of the energy band in the multiple quantum well active region, increase the overlap of electron and hole wave functions, enhance the emission probability, shorten the radiative recombination lifetime, and promote competition between radiative recombination and non-radiative recombination, thereby achieving higher recombination efficiency and improving light emission intensity. This study provides experimental and theoretical evidence that the strain modulation SL interlayer can effectively improve the device performance and offer guidance for optimizing the structural design of devices.
-
Keywords:
- GaN /
- multiple quantum well /
- superlattice /
- strain modulation
[1] Han D, Kim J, Shin D, Shim J 2023 Opt. Express 31 15779Google Scholar
[2] Jeong H, Jeong H, Oh H, Hong C, Suh E, Lerondel G, Jeong M 2015 Sci. Rep. 5 9373Google Scholar
[3] Zhou S, Wan Z, Lei Y, Tang B, Tao G, Du P, Zhao X 2022 Opt. Lett. 47 1291Google Scholar
[4] Wu Y, Xiao Y, Navid I, Sun K, Malhotra Y, Wang P, Wang D, Xu Y, Pandey A, Reddeppa M, Shin W, Liu J, Min J, Mi Z 2022 Light Sci. Appl. 11 294Google Scholar
[5] Das S, Lenka T, Talukdar F, Sadaf S, Velpula R, Nguyen H 2022 Appl. Opt. 61 8951Google Scholar
[6] Cho L, Lee B, Lee K, Kim J, Ryu M 2021 J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. 21 5648Google Scholar
[7] Hu H, Zhou S, Wan H, Liu X, Li N, Xu H 2019 Sci. Rep. 9 3447Google Scholar
[8] Li X, Liu J, Su X, Huang S, Tian A, Zhou W, Jiang L, Ikeda M, Yang H 2021 Materials (Basel, Switzerland) 14 1877Google Scholar
[9] Cai J X, Sun H Q, Zheng H, Zhang P J, Guo Z Y 2014 Chin. Phys. B 23 58502Google Scholar
[10] 邢艳辉, 邓军, 韩军, 李建军, 沈光池 2009 58 590Google Scholar
Xing Y H, Deng J, Han J, Li J J, Shen G C 2009 Acta Phys. Sin. 58 590Google Scholar
[11] Shi J L, Shin Y C, Kim K C, Kim E H, Yun M S, Moon Y, Hwang S M, Kim T G 2008 J. Cryst. Growth 311 103Google Scholar
[12] 齐维靖, 张萌, 潘拴, 王小兰, 张建立, 江风益 2016 65 077801Google Scholar
Qi W J, Zhang M, Pan S, Wang X L, Zhang J L, Jiang F Y 2016 Acta Phys. Sin. 65 077801Google Scholar
[13] Cui S, Tao G, Gong L, Zhao X, Zhou S 2022 Materials (Basel, Switzerland) 15 8649Google Scholar
[14] Liu L, Wang L, Li D, Liu N Y, Li L, Cao W Y, Yang W, Wan C H, Chen W H, Du W M, Hu X D, Feng Z C 2011 J. Appl. Phys. 109 073106Google Scholar
[15] Chen C, Hsieh C, Liao C, Chung W, Chen H, Cao W, Chang W, Chen H, Yao Y, Ting S, Kiang Y, Yang C, Hu X 2012 Opt. Express 20 11321Google Scholar
[16] Kuroda T, Tackeuchi A, Sota T 2000 Appl. Phys. Lett. 76 3753Google Scholar
[17] Akasaka T, Gotoh H, Saito T, Makimoto T 2004 Appl. Phys. Lett. 85 3089Google Scholar
[18] Kumano H, Hoshi K, Tanaka S, Suemune I, Shen X Q, Riblet P, Ramvall P, Aoyagi Y 1999 Appl. Phys. Lett. 75 2879Google Scholar
[19] Ridley B K, Schaff W J, Eastman L F 2003 J. Appl. Phys. 94 3972Google Scholar
[20] Sze S M, Ng K K 1981 Physics of Semiconductor Devices (New York: Wiley) p45
[21] Hsu L, Walukiewicz W 1998 Appl. Phys. Lett. 73 339Google Scholar
[22] Fiorentini V, Bernardini F, Ambacher O 2002 Appl. Phys. Lett. 80 1204Google Scholar
[23] Chuang S L 1995 Physics of Optoelectronic Devices (New York: Wiley) p560
[24] Zhang H, Miller E J, Yu E T, Poblenz C, Speck J S 2004 Appl. Phys. Lett. 84 4644Google Scholar
[25] Renner F, Kiesel P, Döhler G H, Kneissl M, Van de Walle C G, Johnson N M 2002 Appl. Phys. Lett. 81 490Google Scholar
[26] Braun W, Dowd P, Guo C Z, Chen S L, Ryu C M, Koelle U, Johnson S R, Zhang Y H, Tomm J W, Elsässer T, Smith D J 2000 J. Appl. Phys. 88 3004Google Scholar
-
表 1 拟合参数α, β, EA1, EA2及内量子效率
Table 1. Fitting Parameters of α, β, EA1, and EA2 together with the internal quantum efficiency.
Sample IQE/% $ \alpha $ $ \beta $ $ {E_{{\text{A1}}}}{\text{/meV}} $ $ {E_{{\text{A2}}}}{\text{/meV}} $ MQW 22 0.33 9.28 5.36 47.80 MQW+SL 26 0.34 8.23 2.05 33.37 表 2 量子阱中电场强度和波函数交叠积分模拟结果
Table 2. Simulation results of the electric field and wave function overlaps in each quantum well.
MQW Electric field E1/(kV⋅cm–1) Overlap/% MQW+SL Electric field E2/(kV⋅cm–1) Overlap/% QW1 442.5 83.9 QW1 396.7 89.1 QW2 467.1 82.7 QW2 410.0 88.7 QW3 473.0 82.6 QW3 414.3 88.7 QW4 475.8 82.5 QW4 418.1 88.6 QW5 484.2 81.2 QW5 425.6 87.8 -
[1] Han D, Kim J, Shin D, Shim J 2023 Opt. Express 31 15779Google Scholar
[2] Jeong H, Jeong H, Oh H, Hong C, Suh E, Lerondel G, Jeong M 2015 Sci. Rep. 5 9373Google Scholar
[3] Zhou S, Wan Z, Lei Y, Tang B, Tao G, Du P, Zhao X 2022 Opt. Lett. 47 1291Google Scholar
[4] Wu Y, Xiao Y, Navid I, Sun K, Malhotra Y, Wang P, Wang D, Xu Y, Pandey A, Reddeppa M, Shin W, Liu J, Min J, Mi Z 2022 Light Sci. Appl. 11 294Google Scholar
[5] Das S, Lenka T, Talukdar F, Sadaf S, Velpula R, Nguyen H 2022 Appl. Opt. 61 8951Google Scholar
[6] Cho L, Lee B, Lee K, Kim J, Ryu M 2021 J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. 21 5648Google Scholar
[7] Hu H, Zhou S, Wan H, Liu X, Li N, Xu H 2019 Sci. Rep. 9 3447Google Scholar
[8] Li X, Liu J, Su X, Huang S, Tian A, Zhou W, Jiang L, Ikeda M, Yang H 2021 Materials (Basel, Switzerland) 14 1877Google Scholar
[9] Cai J X, Sun H Q, Zheng H, Zhang P J, Guo Z Y 2014 Chin. Phys. B 23 58502Google Scholar
[10] 邢艳辉, 邓军, 韩军, 李建军, 沈光池 2009 58 590Google Scholar
Xing Y H, Deng J, Han J, Li J J, Shen G C 2009 Acta Phys. Sin. 58 590Google Scholar
[11] Shi J L, Shin Y C, Kim K C, Kim E H, Yun M S, Moon Y, Hwang S M, Kim T G 2008 J. Cryst. Growth 311 103Google Scholar
[12] 齐维靖, 张萌, 潘拴, 王小兰, 张建立, 江风益 2016 65 077801Google Scholar
Qi W J, Zhang M, Pan S, Wang X L, Zhang J L, Jiang F Y 2016 Acta Phys. Sin. 65 077801Google Scholar
[13] Cui S, Tao G, Gong L, Zhao X, Zhou S 2022 Materials (Basel, Switzerland) 15 8649Google Scholar
[14] Liu L, Wang L, Li D, Liu N Y, Li L, Cao W Y, Yang W, Wan C H, Chen W H, Du W M, Hu X D, Feng Z C 2011 J. Appl. Phys. 109 073106Google Scholar
[15] Chen C, Hsieh C, Liao C, Chung W, Chen H, Cao W, Chang W, Chen H, Yao Y, Ting S, Kiang Y, Yang C, Hu X 2012 Opt. Express 20 11321Google Scholar
[16] Kuroda T, Tackeuchi A, Sota T 2000 Appl. Phys. Lett. 76 3753Google Scholar
[17] Akasaka T, Gotoh H, Saito T, Makimoto T 2004 Appl. Phys. Lett. 85 3089Google Scholar
[18] Kumano H, Hoshi K, Tanaka S, Suemune I, Shen X Q, Riblet P, Ramvall P, Aoyagi Y 1999 Appl. Phys. Lett. 75 2879Google Scholar
[19] Ridley B K, Schaff W J, Eastman L F 2003 J. Appl. Phys. 94 3972Google Scholar
[20] Sze S M, Ng K K 1981 Physics of Semiconductor Devices (New York: Wiley) p45
[21] Hsu L, Walukiewicz W 1998 Appl. Phys. Lett. 73 339Google Scholar
[22] Fiorentini V, Bernardini F, Ambacher O 2002 Appl. Phys. Lett. 80 1204Google Scholar
[23] Chuang S L 1995 Physics of Optoelectronic Devices (New York: Wiley) p560
[24] Zhang H, Miller E J, Yu E T, Poblenz C, Speck J S 2004 Appl. Phys. Lett. 84 4644Google Scholar
[25] Renner F, Kiesel P, Döhler G H, Kneissl M, Van de Walle C G, Johnson N M 2002 Appl. Phys. Lett. 81 490Google Scholar
[26] Braun W, Dowd P, Guo C Z, Chen S L, Ryu C M, Koelle U, Johnson S R, Zhang Y H, Tomm J W, Elsässer T, Smith D J 2000 J. Appl. Phys. 88 3004Google Scholar
Catalog
Metrics
- Abstract views: 1890
- PDF Downloads: 44
- Cited By: 0