-
Silicon pixel detectors are widely used as vertex detectors or inner trackers in high-energy collider experiments because of their excellent spatial resolution, extremely high counting capability and low power consumption. The study of the silicon pixel detector based on the monolithic active pixel sensor (MAPS) is one of the R&D schemes for upgrading the inner chamber of the Beijing spectrometer Ⅲ (BESⅢ) drift chamber (MDC). It is planned to build a 1/10 scale prototype of the inner chamber. The detector module is the basic component of the prototype, consisting of ten MIMOSA28 chips thinned to 50 μm, a flexible cable and a carbon fiber support. In order to study the performance of the module, a test system is set up. The system is composed mainly of five-layer modules, readout electronics and data acquisition system. This article focuses on the realization of the continuous data readout method with trigger marking function, the measurement of the noise level of the detector modules, the module response test by a radioactive source, and the study of the hit reconstruction algorithm. The test of trigger readout logic verifies the correctness of the continuous readout method with trigger marking. It can be concluded that analyzing consecutive three frames data (the previous frame, the current frame and the next frame) of each valid trigger will not lead to effective hit data loss. The noise level of the detector module is tested. The results show that the fixed pattern noise (FPN) is 0.253 mV, and the temporal noise (TN) is 1.65 mV. The fake hit rate is less than
$ {10}^{-5} $ that can be ignored when the chip threshold is set to be above 4σ of noise. Two algorithms for hit reconstruction (i.e. adjacent method and comparison method) are studied and compared. When the average number of fired pixels caused by each hit is 2.562 and more than four hits in each frame of data, the adjacent method can find all of the fired pixels to be faster. During the test, the detector module and the electronics are proved to work well. These studies lay a foundation for further testing the performance of the detector prototype.[1] Weste N H E, Eshraghian K 1985 NASA STI/Recon Technical Report A 85 47028
[2] MacMillen D, Camposano R, Hill D, Williams T W 2000 IEEE Trans.Comput.Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst. 19 1428
Google Scholar
[3] Greiner L, Anderssen E, Matis H S, Ritter H G, Schambach J, Silber J, Stezelberger T, Sun X, Szelezniak M, Thomas J, Videbaek F, Vu C, Wieman H 2011 Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A 650 68
Google Scholar
[4] Contin G, Anderssen E, Greiner L, Schambach J, Silber J, Stezelberger T, Sun X, Szelezniak M, Vu C, Wieman H, Woodmansee S 2015 JINST 10 C03026
Google Scholar
[5] Brüning O, Burkhardt H, Myers S 2012 Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 67 705
Google Scholar
[6] Schukraft J 2012 Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London, Ser. A 370 917
Google Scholar
[7] Mager M 2016 Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A 824 434
Google Scholar
[8] Keil M 2015 JINST 10 C03012
Google Scholar
[9] Zhou Y, Lu Y P, Wu Z G, Shi T, Ju X D, Dong J, Zhu H B, Ouyang Q 2020 Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A 980 164427
Google Scholar
[10] Wei W, Zhang J, Ning Z, Lu Y P, Fan L, Li H S, Jiang X S, Lan A K, Ou-Yang Q, Wang Z, Zhu K J, Chen Y B, Liu P 2016 Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A 835 169
Google Scholar
[11] Zhang C 2009 Chin. Phys. C 33 60
Google Scholar
[12] Harris F A 2006 Nucl. Phys. B 162 345
Google Scholar
[13] Hu G C, Baudot J, Bertolone G, et al. 2010 Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A 623 480
Google Scholar
[14] Contin G, Greiner L, Schambach J, Szelezniak M, Anderssen E, Bell J, Cepeda M, Johnson T, Qiu H, Ritter H G, Silber J, Stezelberger T, Sun X M, Tran C, Vu C, Wieman H, Wilson K, Witharm R, Woodmansee S, Wolf J 2018 Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A 907 60
Google Scholar
[15] Ultimate user manual, Himmi A, Doziere G, Bertolone G, Dulinski W, Coll-edani C, Dorokhov A, Hu Ch, Morel F, Pham H, Valin I, Wang J http://www.iphc.cnrs.fr/IMG/pdf/Ultimate_UserManual.pdf [2021-3-9]
[16] Valin I, Hu-Guo C, Baudot J, Bertolone G, Besson A, Colledani C, Clau G, Dorokhov A, Dozière G, Dulinski W, Gelin M, Goffe M, Himmi A, Jaaskel-ainen K, Morel F, Pham H, Santos C, Senyukov S, Specht M, Voutsinas G, Wang J, Winter M 2012 JINST 7 C01102
Google Scholar
[17] Highland V L 1975 Nucl. Instrum. Meth. 129 497
Google Scholar
[18] Szelezniak M A, Deptuch G W, Guilloux F, Heini S, Himmi A 2007 IEEE J. Sensor 7 137
Google Scholar
[19] 7 Series FPGAs Data Sheet: Overview, Xinlinx https://www.xilinx.com/support/documentation/data_sheets/ds180_7 Series_Overview.pdf[2021-4-19]
[20] Mathieson K, Passmore M S, Seller P, Prydderch M L, O’Shea V, Bates R L, Smith K M, Rahman M 2002 Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A 487 113
Google Scholar
-
图 1 实验室测试系统装置示意图
Figure 1. Schematic of the experimental setup in the laboratory.
图 2 探测模块结构
Figure 2. Structure of the detector module.
图 3 探测模块的数据经FPGA处理后的格式
Figure 3. Format of the data of the detector module processed by FPGA.
图 4 连续读出流程
Figure 4. Process of continuous readout.
图 5 每次触发模块2—模块5对应的数据帧号与模块1对应的数据帧号的差值
Figure 5. Difference of the frame number between module 2– module 5 and module1 corresponding to the same event (trigger).
图 6 探测模块的噪声水平(1 ADC=0.25 mV) (a) 传输曲线的Mean值分布(FPN为1.01067 ADC, 转换成电压值为0.253 mV); (b) 传输曲线的Sigma值分布(TN为6.60172 ADC, 转换成电压值为1.65 mV)
Figure 6. Noise level of detector module (1 ADC unit = 0.25 mV): (a) Mean distribution of transmission curve (FPN is 1.01067 ADC, converted into the voltage is 0.253 mV); (b) Sigma distribution of transmission curve (TN is 1.01067 ADC, converted into the voltage is 1.65 mV).
图 7 误击中率随阈值的变化
Figure 7. FHR as a function of the threshold.
图 8 五层探测模块击中挑选结果(右侧色温表给出像素被击中的次数)
Figure 8. Hit selection of the five-layer detection module (The rainbow indicates the number of times a pixel being hit).
图 9 相邻法实现流程图
Figure 9. Flow chart of adjacent method.
图 10 比较法中相邻像素的四种标记情况
Figure 10. Four marking situations of adjacent pixels in the comparison method.
图 11 90Sr放射源测试得到芯片上cluster size的分布
Figure 11. Cluster size distribution on the chip tested by 90Sr source.
表 1 两种算法的复杂度比较
Table 1. Comparison of the complexity of the two algorithms.
相邻法 比较法 循环次数 $4 \times M \times N$ $({ { {M^2} \times {N^2} - M \times N} })/{2}$ 时间复杂度T(N) O(N) O(N2) 
DownLoad: CSV
-
[1] Weste N H E, Eshraghian K 1985 NASA STI/Recon Technical Report A 85 47028
[2] MacMillen D, Camposano R, Hill D, Williams T W 2000 IEEE Trans.Comput.Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst. 19 1428
Google Scholar
[3] Greiner L, Anderssen E, Matis H S, Ritter H G, Schambach J, Silber J, Stezelberger T, Sun X, Szelezniak M, Thomas J, Videbaek F, Vu C, Wieman H 2011 Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A 650 68
Google Scholar
[4] Contin G, Anderssen E, Greiner L, Schambach J, Silber J, Stezelberger T, Sun X, Szelezniak M, Vu C, Wieman H, Woodmansee S 2015 JINST 10 C03026
Google Scholar
[5] Brüning O, Burkhardt H, Myers S 2012 Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 67 705
Google Scholar
[6] Schukraft J 2012 Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London, Ser. A 370 917
Google Scholar
[7] Mager M 2016 Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A 824 434
Google Scholar
[8] Keil M 2015 JINST 10 C03012
Google Scholar
[9] Zhou Y, Lu Y P, Wu Z G, Shi T, Ju X D, Dong J, Zhu H B, Ouyang Q 2020 Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A 980 164427
Google Scholar
[10] Wei W, Zhang J, Ning Z, Lu Y P, Fan L, Li H S, Jiang X S, Lan A K, Ou-Yang Q, Wang Z, Zhu K J, Chen Y B, Liu P 2016 Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A 835 169
Google Scholar
[11] Zhang C 2009 Chin. Phys. C 33 60
Google Scholar
[12] Harris F A 2006 Nucl. Phys. B 162 345
Google Scholar
[13] Hu G C, Baudot J, Bertolone G, et al. 2010 Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A 623 480
Google Scholar
[14] Contin G, Greiner L, Schambach J, Szelezniak M, Anderssen E, Bell J, Cepeda M, Johnson T, Qiu H, Ritter H G, Silber J, Stezelberger T, Sun X M, Tran C, Vu C, Wieman H, Wilson K, Witharm R, Woodmansee S, Wolf J 2018 Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A 907 60
Google Scholar
[15] Ultimate user manual, Himmi A, Doziere G, Bertolone G, Dulinski W, Coll-edani C, Dorokhov A, Hu Ch, Morel F, Pham H, Valin I, Wang J http://www.iphc.cnrs.fr/IMG/pdf/Ultimate_UserManual.pdf [2021-3-9]
[16] Valin I, Hu-Guo C, Baudot J, Bertolone G, Besson A, Colledani C, Clau G, Dorokhov A, Dozière G, Dulinski W, Gelin M, Goffe M, Himmi A, Jaaskel-ainen K, Morel F, Pham H, Santos C, Senyukov S, Specht M, Voutsinas G, Wang J, Winter M 2012 JINST 7 C01102
Google Scholar
[17] Highland V L 1975 Nucl. Instrum. Meth. 129 497
Google Scholar
[18] Szelezniak M A, Deptuch G W, Guilloux F, Heini S, Himmi A 2007 IEEE J. Sensor 7 137
Google Scholar
[19] 7 Series FPGAs Data Sheet: Overview, Xinlinx https://www.xilinx.com/support/documentation/data_sheets/ds180_7 Series_Overview.pdf[2021-4-19]
[20] Mathieson K, Passmore M S, Seller P, Prydderch M L, O’Shea V, Bates R L, Smith K M, Rahman M 2002 Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A 487 113
Google Scholar
DownLoad:
Catalog
Metrics
- Abstract views: 4987
- PDF Downloads: 76
- Cited By: 0
