Research progress of integrated optical quantum computing

Zhou Wen-Hao; Wang Yao; Weng Wen-Kang; Jin Xian-Min

doi:10.7498/aps.71.20221782

Abstract

Quantum computing, based on the inherent superposition and entanglement properties of quantum states, can break through the limits of classical computing power. However, under the present technical conditions, the number of qubits that can be manipulated is still limited. In addition, the preparation of high-precision quantum gates and additional quantum error correction systems requires more auxiliary bits, which leads to extra cost. Therefore, it seems to be a long-term goal to realize a universal fault-tolerant quantum computer.The development of analog quantum computing is a transition path that can be used to simulate many-body physics problems. Quantum walk, as the quantum counterpart of classical random walks, is a research hotspot in analog quantum computing. Owing to the unique quantum superposition characteristics, quantum walk exhibits the ballistic transport properties of outward diffusion, so quantum walk provides acceleration in computing power for various algorithms. Based on quantum walk, different computing models are derived to deal with practical physical problems in different fields, such as biology, physics, economics, and computer science.A large number of technical routes are devoted to the experiments on realizing quantum walk, including optical fiber networks, superconducting systems, nuclear magnetic resonance systems, and trapped ion atom systems. Among these routes, photons are considered as the reliable information carriers in the experiments on quantum walking due to their controllability, long coherence time. and fast speed.Therefore, in this review, we focus on different quantum walk theories and experimental implementations in optical versions, such as traditional optical platforms, optical fiber platforms, and integrated optical quantum platform. In recent years, the rapid development of integrated optical quantum platforms has driven the experiments on quantum walk to move towards the stage of integration and miniaturization, and at the same time, the experimental scale and the number of qubits have gradually increased.To this end, we summarize the technological progress of integrated optical quantum computing, including various integrated optical quantum experimental platforms and their applications. Secondly, we specifically discuss the experiment on quantum walk and practical applications based on integrated optical quantum platforms. Finally, we briefly describe other quantum algorithms and corresponding experimental implementations.These quantum computing schemes provide computational speedups for specific physical problems. In the future, with the further development of integrated optical quantum technology, along with the increase in the number of controllable qubits and the realization of the supporting quantum error correction system, a larger-scale many-body physical system can be constructed to further expand these algorithms and move towards the field of optical quantum computing, a new stage.

Keywords:

Authors and contacts

1.
School of Physics and Astronomy, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China
2.
Shenzhen Institute for Quantum Science and Engineering, Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen 518055, China
3.
Chip Hub for Integrated Photonics Xplore (CHIPX), Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Wuxi 214000, China

Corresponding author: Weng Wen-Kang, yung@sustech.edu.cn ; Jin Xian-Min, xianmin.jin@sjtu.edu.cn

Funds: Project supported by the National Key R&D Program of China (Grant Nos. 2019YFA0308700, 2019YFA0706302, 2017YFA0303700), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 11904229, 61734005, 11761141014, 11690033), the Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality, China (Grant Nos. 20JC1416300, 2019SHZDZX01), and the Shanghai Municipal Education Commission, China (Grant No. 2017-01-07-00-02-E00049).

FullText HTML : translate this paragraph

References

[1]	Moore G E 1998 Proceedings of the IEEE 86 82 Google Scholar
[2]	Feynman R P 1982 International Journal of Theoretical Physics 21 467 Google Scholar
[3]	Shor P W 1994 In Proceedings 35 th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science Santa Fe, NM, USA, November 20–22, 1994 p124
[4]	Grover L K 1997 Phys. Rev. Lett. 79 325 Google Scholar
[5]	Aaronson S, Gottesman D 2004 Physical Review A 70 052328 Google Scholar
[6]	Albash T, Lidar D A 2018 Rev. Mod. Phys. 90 015002 Google Scholar
[7]	Raussendorf R, Briegel H J 2001 Phys. Rev. Lett. 86 5188 Google Scholar
[8]	Sarma S, Freedman M, Nayak C 2015 npj Quantum Inf. 1 15001 Google Scholar
[9]	Liu Z H, Sun K, Pachos J K, Yang M, Meng Y, Liao Y W, Li Q, Wang J F, Luo Z Y, He Y F, Huang D Y, Ding G R, Xu J S, Han Y J, Li C F, Guo G C 2021 PRX Quantum 2 030323 Google Scholar
[10]	DiVinzenzo D P 2001 Quant. Inf. Comp. 1 1 Google Scholar
[11]	Zhong H S, Wang H, Deng Y H, et al. 2020 Science 370 1460 Google Scholar
[12]	Arute F, Arya K, Babbush R, et al. 2019 Nature 574 505 Google Scholar
[13]	Preskill J 2018 Quantum 2 79 Google Scholar
[14]	Ladd T D, Jelezko F, Laflamme R, Nakamura Y, Monroe C, O’Brien J L 2010 Nature 464 45 Google Scholar
[15]	Gisin N, Ribordy G, Tittel W, Zbinden H 2002 Rev. Mod. Phys. 74 145 Google Scholar
[16]	Kok P, Munro W J, Nemoto K, Ralph T C, Dowling J P, Milburn G J 2007 Rev. Mod. Phys. 79 797 Google Scholar
[17]	O’Brien J L, Pryde G J, White A G, Ralph T C, Branning D 2003 Nature 426 264 Google Scholar
[18]	Pearson K 1905 Nature 72 294 Google Scholar
[19]	Aharonov Y, Davidovich L, Zagury N 1993 Phys. Rev. A 48 1687 Google Scholar
[20]	Farhi E, Gutmann S 1998 Phys. Rev. A 58 915 Google Scholar
[21]	Childs A M, Cleve R, Deotto E, Farhi E, Gutmann S, Spielman D A 2003 Proceedings of the Thirty-Fifth Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, San Diego, USA, June 9–11, 2003 p59
[22]	De Nicola F, Sansoni L, Crespi A, Ramponi R, Osellame R, Giovannetti V, Fazio R, Mataloni P, Sciarrino F 2014 Phys. Rev. A 89 032322 Google Scholar
[23]	Peruzzo A, Lobino M, Matthews J C, et al. 2010 Science 329 1500 Google Scholar
[24]	Schreiber A, Cassemiro K N, Potoček V, Gábris A, Mosley P J, Andersson E, Jex I, Silberhorn Ch 2010 Phys. Rev. Lett. 104 050502 Google Scholar
[25]	Defienne H, Barbieri M, Walmsley I A, Smith B J, Gigan S 2016 Sci. Adv. 2 e1501054 Google Scholar
[26]	Yan Z G, Zhang Y R, Gong M, Wu Y L, Zheng Y, Li S, Wang C, Liang F, Lin J, Xu Y, Guo C, Sun L, Peng C Z, Xia K Y, Deng H, Rong H, You J Q, Nori F, Fan H, Zhu X B, Pan J W 2019 Science 364 753 Google Scholar
[27]	Du J F, Li H, Xu X D, Shi M J, Wu J H, Zhou X Y, Han R D 2003 Phys. Rev. A 67 042316 Google Scholar
[28]	Karski M, Förster L, Choi J M, Steffen A, Alt W, Meschede D, Widera A 2009 Science 325 174 Google Scholar
[29]	Schmitz H, Matjeschk R, Schneider C, Glueckert J, Enderlein M, Huber T, Schaetz T 2009 Phys. Rev. Lett. 103 090504 Google Scholar
[30]	Roldán E, Soriano J C 2005 J. Mod. Opt. 52 2649 Google Scholar
[31]	Schreiber A, Gábris A, Rohde P P, Laiho K, Štefaňák M, Potoček V, Hamilton C, Jex I, Silberhorn C 2012 Science 336 55 Google Scholar
[32]	Politi A, Cryan M J, Rarity J G, Yu S, O'brien J L 2008 Science 320 646 Google Scholar
[33]	Matthews J C, Politi A, Stefanov A, O'brien J L 2009 Nat. Photonics 3 346 Google Scholar
[34]	Shadbolt P J, Verde M R, Peruzzo A, Politi A, Laing A, Lobino M, Matthews J C F, Thompson M G, O'Brien J L 2012 Nat. Photonics 6 45 Google Scholar
[35]	Smith B J, Kundys D, Thomas-Peter N, Smith P G R, Walmsley I A 2009 Opt. Express 17 13516 Google Scholar
[36]	Corrielli G, Crespi A, Geremia R, Ramponi R, Sansoni L, Santinelli A, Mataloni P, Sciarrino F, Osellame R 2014 Nat. Commun. 5 4249 Google Scholar
[37]	Sansoni L, Sciarrino F, Vallone G, Mataloni P, Crespi A, Ramponi R, Osellame R 2010 Phys. Rev. Lett. 105 200503 Google Scholar
[38]	Crespi A, Ramponi R, Osellame R, Sansoni L, Bongioanni I, Sciarrino F, Vallone G, Mataloni P 2011 Nat. Commun. 2 566 Google Scholar
[39]	Carolan J, Harrold C, Sparrow C, et al. 2015 Science 349 711 Google Scholar
[40]	Liou J C 2016 Comput. Mater. Sci. 122 30 Google Scholar
[41]	Kawachi M 1990 Opt. Quantum Electron. 22 391 Google Scholar
[42]	Szameit A, Nolte S 2010 J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 43 163001 Google Scholar
[43]	Kundys D O, Gates J C, Dasgupta S, Gawith C B E, Smith P G R 2009 IEEE Photonics Technol. Lett. 21 947 Google Scholar
[44]	Xiong C, Pernice W, Ryu K K, Schuck C, Fong K Y, Palacios T, Tang H X 2011 Opt. Express 19 10462 Google Scholar
[45]	Harris N C, Grassani D, Simbula A, Pant M, Galli M, Baehr-Jones T, Hochberg M, Englund D, Bajoni D, Galland C 2014 Phys. Rev. X 4 041047 Google Scholar
[46]	Sun J, Timurdogan E, Yaacobi A, Hosseini E S, Watts M R 2013 Nature 493 195 Google Scholar
[47]	Davis K M, Miura K, Sugimoto N, Hirao K 1996 Opt. Lett. 21 1729 Google Scholar
[48]	Osellame R, Cerullo G, Ramponi R 2012 Femtosecond Laser Micromachining: Photonic and Microfluidic Devices in Transparent Materials (Berlin: Springer)
[49]	Jia Y, Wang L, Chen F 2021 Appl. Phys. Rev. 8 011307 Google Scholar
[50]	Wei Q H, Dai H L, Shan H R, Li H G, Cao Z Q, Chen X F 2021 Phys. Rev. B 104 235308 Google Scholar
[51]	Zhou J, Liang Y, Liu Z, Chu W, Zhang H, Yin D, Fang Z, Wu R, Zhang J, Chen W, Wang Z, Zhou Y, Wang M, Cheng Y 2021 Laser Photonics Rev. 15 2100030 Google Scholar
[52]	Kwek L C, Cao L, Luo W, Wang Y X, Sun S H, Wang X B, Liu A Q 2021 AAPPS Bull. 31 15 Google Scholar
[53]	Perets H B, Lahini Y, Pozzi F, Sorel M, Morandotti R, Silberberg Y 2008 Phys. Rev. Lett. 100 170506 Google Scholar
[54]	Harris N C, Steinbrecher G R, Prabhu M, Lahini Y, Mower J, Bunandar D, Chen C, Wong F N C, Baehr-Jones B, Hochberg M, Lloyd S, Englund D 2017 Nat. Photonics 11 447 Google Scholar
[55]	Owens J O, Broome M A, Biggerstaff D N, Goggin M E, Fedrizzi A, Linjordet T, Ams M, Marshall G D, Twamley J, Withford M J, White A G 2011 New J. Phys. 13 075003 Google Scholar
[56]	Sansoni L, Sciarrino F, Vallone G, Mataloni P, Crespi A, Ramponi R, Osellame R 2012 Phys. Rev. Lett. 108 010502 Google Scholar
[57]	Poulios K, Keil R, Fry D, Meinecke J D, Matthews J C, Politi A, Lobino M, Gräfe M, Heinrich M, Nolte S, Szameit A, O’Brien J L 2014 Phys. Rev. Lett. 112 143604 Google Scholar
[58]	Tang H, Lin X F, Feng Z, Chen J Y, Gao J, Sun K, Wang C Y, Lai P C, Xu X Y, Wang Y, Qiao L F, Yang A L, Jin X M 2018 Sci. Adv. 4 aat3174 Google Scholar
[59]	Jiao Z Q, Gao J, Zhou W H, Wang X W, Ren R J, Xu X Y, Qiao L F, Wang Y, Jin X M 2021 Optica 8 1129 Google Scholar
[60]	Ehrhardt M, Keil R, Maczewsky L J, Dittel C, Heinrich M, Szameit A 2021 Sci. Adv. 7 eabc5266 Google Scholar
[61]	Childs A M, Goldstone J 2004 Phys. Rev. A 70 022314 Google Scholar
[62]	Ambainis A 2003 Int. J. Quantum Inf. 1 507 Google Scholar
[63]	Shenvi N, Kempe J, Whaley K B 2003 Phys. Rev. A 67 052307 Google Scholar
[64]	Franco C D, Gettrick M M, Busch T 2011 Phys. Rev. Lett. 106 080502 Google Scholar
[65]	Kendon V M, Tamon C 2011 J. Comput. Theor. Nanosci. 8 422 Google Scholar
[66]	Mohseni M, Rebentrost P, Lloyd S, Guzik A A 2008 J. Chem. Phys. 129 174106 Google Scholar
[67]	Gamble J K, Friesen M, Zhou D, Joynt R, Coppersmith S N 2010 Phys. Rev. A. 81 052313 Google Scholar
[68]	Childs A M 2009 Phys. Rev. Lett. 102 180501 Google Scholar
[69]	Childs A M, Gosset D, Webb Z 2013 Science 339 791 Google Scholar
[70]	Childs A M, Farhi E, Gutmann S 2002 Quantum Inf Process 1 35 Google Scholar
[71]	Tang H, Di Franco C, Shi Z Y, He T S, Feng Z, Gao J, Sun K, Li Z M, Jiao Z Q, Wang T Y, Kim M S, Jin X M 2018 Nat. Photonics 12 754 Google Scholar
[72]	Shi Z Y, Tang H, Feng Z, Wang Y, Li Z M, Gao J, Chang Y J, Wang T Y, Dou J P, Zhang Z Y, Jiao Z Q, Zhou W H, Jin X M 2020 Optica 7 613 Google Scholar
[73]	Wang Y, Cui Z W, Lu Y H, Zhang X M, Gao J, Chang Y J, Yung M H, Jin X M 2020 Phys. Rev. Lett. 125 160502 Google Scholar
[74]	Aaronson S, Arkhipov A 2011 Proceedings of the Forty-third Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing California, San Jose, USA, June 6–8, 2011 p333
[75]	Bentivegna M, Spagnolo N, Vitelli C, et al. 2015 Sci. Adv. 1 e1400255 Google Scholar
[76]	Paesani S, Ding Y, Santagati R, Chakhmakhchyan L, Vigliar C, Rottwitt K, Oxenløwe L K, Wang J W, Thompson M G, Laing A 2019 Nat. Phys. 15 925 Google Scholar
[77]	Zhou W H, Gao J, Jiao Z Q, Wang X W, Ren R J, Pang X L, Qiao L F, Zhang C N, Yang T H, Jin X M 2022 Appl. Phys. Rev. 9 031408 Google Scholar
[78]	Zhong H S, Deng Y H, Qin J, Wang H, Chen M C, Peng L C, Luo Y H, Wu D, Gong S Q, Su H, Hu Y, Hu P, Yang X Y, Zhang W J, Li H, Li Y X, Jiang X, Gan L, Yang G W, You L X, Wang Z, Li L, Liu N L, Renema J J, Lu C Y, Pan J W 2021 Phys. Rev. Lett. 127 180502 Google Scholar
[79]	Gao J, Wang X W, Zhou W H, Jiao Z Q, Ren R J, Fu Y X, Qiao L F, Xu X Y, Zhang C N, Pang X L, Li H, Wang Y, Jin X M 2022 Chip 1 100007 Google Scholar
[80]	Madsen L S, Laudenbach F, Askarani M F, Rortais F, Vincent T, Bulmer J F, Miatto F M, Neuhaus L, Helt L G, Collins M J, Lita A E, Gerrits T, Nam S W, Vaidya V D, Menotti M, Dhand I, Vernon Z, Quesada N, Lavoie J 2022 Nature 606 75 Google Scholar
[81]	Plotnik Y, Rechtsman M C, Song D, Heinrich M, Zeuner J M, Nolte S, Lumer Y, Malkova N, Xu J J, Szameit A, Chen Z G, Segev M 2014 Nat. Mater. 13 57 Google Scholar
[82]	Rechtsman M C, Zeuner J M, Plotnik Y, Lumer Y, Podolsky D, Dreisow F, Nolte S, Segev M, Szameit A 2013 Nature 496 196 Google Scholar
[83]	Wang Y, Lu Y H, Mei F, Gao J, Li Z M, Tang H, Zhu S L, Jia S, Jin X M 2019 Phys. Rev. Lett. 122 193903 Google Scholar
[84]	Wang Y, Pang X L, Lu Y H, Gao J, Chang Y J, Qiao L F, Jiao Z Q, Tang H, Jin X M 2019 Optica 6 955 Google Scholar
[85]	Wang Y, Lu Y H, Gao J, Chang Y J, Ren R J, Jiao Z Q, Zhang Z Y, Jin X M 2022 Chip 1 100003 Google Scholar
[86]	Blanco-Redondo A, Bell B, Oren D, Eggleton B J, Segev M 2018 Science 362 568 Google Scholar
[87]	Barik S, Karasahin A, Flower C, Cai T, Miyake H, DeGottardi W, Hafezi M, Waks E 2018 Science 359 666 Google Scholar
[88]	Tambasco J L, Corrielli G, Chapman R J, Crespi A, Zilberberg O, Osellame R, Peruzzo A 2018 Sci. Adv. 4 eaat3187 Google Scholar
[89]	Wang M, Doyle C, Bell B, Collins M J, Magi E, Eggleton B J, Segev M, Blanco-Redondo A 2019 Nanophotonics 8 1327 Google Scholar
[90]	Mittal S, Orre V V, Goldschmidt E A, Hafezi M 2021 Nat. Photonics 15 542 Google Scholar

Cited By

图 1 (a)离散时间量子行走, 图片来自文献[22]; (b)连续时间量子行走, 图片来自文献[23]

Figure 1. (a) Discrete-time quantum walks, the picture is reproduced from the Ref. [22]; (b) continuous-time quantum walks, the picture is reproduced from the Ref. [23].

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

图 2 不同的集成光量子平台　(a)硅基平台, 图片来自文献[40]; (b)硅基二氧化硅平台, 图片来自文献[41]; (c)飞秒激光直写平台, 图片来自文献[42]; (d) UV直写平台, 图片来自文献[43]

Figure 2. Different integrated optical quantum platforms: (a) Silicon-on-insulator platform, the picture is reproduced from the Ref. [40]; (b) silica-on-silicon platform, the picture is reproduced from the Ref. [41]; (c) femtosecond laser direct writing platform, the picture is reproduced from the Ref. [42]; (d) UV direct writing platform, the picture is reproduced from the Ref. [43].

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

图 3 不同波导结构图　(a) 一维波导阵列, 图来自文献[53]; (b) 椭圆型波导阵列, 图来自文献[55]; (c) 三维波导结构, 图来自文献[56]; (d) “十字”波导阵列, 图来自文献[57].

Figure 3. Different waveguide structures: (a) One-dimensional waveguide array, the picture is reproduced from the Ref. [53]; (b) elliptical waveguide array, the picture is reproduced from the Ref. [55]; (c) three-dimensional waveguide structure, the picture is reproduced from the Ref. [56]; (d) “cross” waveguide array, the picture is reproduced from the Ref. [57].

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

图 4 光子芯片上的二维量子行走. 图来自文献[58]

Figure 4. Two-dimensional quantum walks on a photonic chip, the picture is reproduced from the Ref. [58].

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

图 5 关联光子对的二维量子行走. 图来自文献[59]

Figure 5. Two-dimensional quantum walks of correlated photons, the picture is reproduced from the Ref. [59].

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

图 6 利用偏振作为额外的合成维度, 图来自文献[60]

Figure 6. Using polarization as an additional synthetic dimension. The picture is reproduced from the Ref. [60].

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

图 7 量子行走用于模拟光合作用中的能量转移过程, 图来自文献[66]

Figure 7. Quantum walks in photosynthetic energy transfer, the picture is reproduced from the Ref. [66].

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

图 8 与非逻辑树问题, 图来自文献[73]

Figure 8. Nand tree problem, the picture is reproduced from the Ref. [73].

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

map

[1]	Moore G E 1998 Proceedings of the IEEE 86 82 Google Scholar
[2]	Feynman R P 1982 International Journal of Theoretical Physics 21 467 Google Scholar
[3]	Shor P W 1994 In Proceedings 35 th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science Santa Fe, NM, USA, November 20–22, 1994 p124
[4]	Grover L K 1997 Phys. Rev. Lett. 79 325 Google Scholar
[5]	Aaronson S, Gottesman D 2004 Physical Review A 70 052328 Google Scholar
[6]	Albash T, Lidar D A 2018 Rev. Mod. Phys. 90 015002 Google Scholar
[7]	Raussendorf R, Briegel H J 2001 Phys. Rev. Lett. 86 5188 Google Scholar
[8]	Sarma S, Freedman M, Nayak C 2015 npj Quantum Inf. 1 15001 Google Scholar
[9]	Liu Z H, Sun K, Pachos J K, Yang M, Meng Y, Liao Y W, Li Q, Wang J F, Luo Z Y, He Y F, Huang D Y, Ding G R, Xu J S, Han Y J, Li C F, Guo G C 2021 PRX Quantum 2 030323 Google Scholar
[10]	DiVinzenzo D P 2001 Quant. Inf. Comp. 1 1 Google Scholar
[11]	Zhong H S, Wang H, Deng Y H, et al. 2020 Science 370 1460 Google Scholar
[12]	Arute F, Arya K, Babbush R, et al. 2019 Nature 574 505 Google Scholar
[13]	Preskill J 2018 Quantum 2 79 Google Scholar
[14]	Ladd T D, Jelezko F, Laflamme R, Nakamura Y, Monroe C, O’Brien J L 2010 Nature 464 45 Google Scholar
[15]	Gisin N, Ribordy G, Tittel W, Zbinden H 2002 Rev. Mod. Phys. 74 145 Google Scholar
[16]	Kok P, Munro W J, Nemoto K, Ralph T C, Dowling J P, Milburn G J 2007 Rev. Mod. Phys. 79 797 Google Scholar
[17]	O’Brien J L, Pryde G J, White A G, Ralph T C, Branning D 2003 Nature 426 264 Google Scholar
[18]	Pearson K 1905 Nature 72 294 Google Scholar
[19]	Aharonov Y, Davidovich L, Zagury N 1993 Phys. Rev. A 48 1687 Google Scholar
[20]	Farhi E, Gutmann S 1998 Phys. Rev. A 58 915 Google Scholar
[21]	Childs A M, Cleve R, Deotto E, Farhi E, Gutmann S, Spielman D A 2003 Proceedings of the Thirty-Fifth Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, San Diego, USA, June 9–11, 2003 p59
[22]	De Nicola F, Sansoni L, Crespi A, Ramponi R, Osellame R, Giovannetti V, Fazio R, Mataloni P, Sciarrino F 2014 Phys. Rev. A 89 032322 Google Scholar
[23]	Peruzzo A, Lobino M, Matthews J C, et al. 2010 Science 329 1500 Google Scholar
[24]	Schreiber A, Cassemiro K N, Potoček V, Gábris A, Mosley P J, Andersson E, Jex I, Silberhorn Ch 2010 Phys. Rev. Lett. 104 050502 Google Scholar
[25]	Defienne H, Barbieri M, Walmsley I A, Smith B J, Gigan S 2016 Sci. Adv. 2 e1501054 Google Scholar
[26]	Yan Z G, Zhang Y R, Gong M, Wu Y L, Zheng Y, Li S, Wang C, Liang F, Lin J, Xu Y, Guo C, Sun L, Peng C Z, Xia K Y, Deng H, Rong H, You J Q, Nori F, Fan H, Zhu X B, Pan J W 2019 Science 364 753 Google Scholar
[27]	Du J F, Li H, Xu X D, Shi M J, Wu J H, Zhou X Y, Han R D 2003 Phys. Rev. A 67 042316 Google Scholar
[28]	Karski M, Förster L, Choi J M, Steffen A, Alt W, Meschede D, Widera A 2009 Science 325 174 Google Scholar
[29]	Schmitz H, Matjeschk R, Schneider C, Glueckert J, Enderlein M, Huber T, Schaetz T 2009 Phys. Rev. Lett. 103 090504 Google Scholar
[30]	Roldán E, Soriano J C 2005 J. Mod. Opt. 52 2649 Google Scholar
[31]	Schreiber A, Gábris A, Rohde P P, Laiho K, Štefaňák M, Potoček V, Hamilton C, Jex I, Silberhorn C 2012 Science 336 55 Google Scholar
[32]	Politi A, Cryan M J, Rarity J G, Yu S, O'brien J L 2008 Science 320 646 Google Scholar
[33]	Matthews J C, Politi A, Stefanov A, O'brien J L 2009 Nat. Photonics 3 346 Google Scholar
[34]	Shadbolt P J, Verde M R, Peruzzo A, Politi A, Laing A, Lobino M, Matthews J C F, Thompson M G, O'Brien J L 2012 Nat. Photonics 6 45 Google Scholar
[35]	Smith B J, Kundys D, Thomas-Peter N, Smith P G R, Walmsley I A 2009 Opt. Express 17 13516 Google Scholar
[36]	Corrielli G, Crespi A, Geremia R, Ramponi R, Sansoni L, Santinelli A, Mataloni P, Sciarrino F, Osellame R 2014 Nat. Commun. 5 4249 Google Scholar
[37]	Sansoni L, Sciarrino F, Vallone G, Mataloni P, Crespi A, Ramponi R, Osellame R 2010 Phys. Rev. Lett. 105 200503 Google Scholar
[38]	Crespi A, Ramponi R, Osellame R, Sansoni L, Bongioanni I, Sciarrino F, Vallone G, Mataloni P 2011 Nat. Commun. 2 566 Google Scholar
[39]	Carolan J, Harrold C, Sparrow C, et al. 2015 Science 349 711 Google Scholar
[40]	Liou J C 2016 Comput. Mater. Sci. 122 30 Google Scholar
[41]	Kawachi M 1990 Opt. Quantum Electron. 22 391 Google Scholar
[42]	Szameit A, Nolte S 2010 J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 43 163001 Google Scholar
[43]	Kundys D O, Gates J C, Dasgupta S, Gawith C B E, Smith P G R 2009 IEEE Photonics Technol. Lett. 21 947 Google Scholar
[44]	Xiong C, Pernice W, Ryu K K, Schuck C, Fong K Y, Palacios T, Tang H X 2011 Opt. Express 19 10462 Google Scholar
[45]	Harris N C, Grassani D, Simbula A, Pant M, Galli M, Baehr-Jones T, Hochberg M, Englund D, Bajoni D, Galland C 2014 Phys. Rev. X 4 041047 Google Scholar
[46]	Sun J, Timurdogan E, Yaacobi A, Hosseini E S, Watts M R 2013 Nature 493 195 Google Scholar
[47]	Davis K M, Miura K, Sugimoto N, Hirao K 1996 Opt. Lett. 21 1729 Google Scholar
[48]	Osellame R, Cerullo G, Ramponi R 2012 Femtosecond Laser Micromachining: Photonic and Microfluidic Devices in Transparent Materials (Berlin: Springer)
[49]	Jia Y, Wang L, Chen F 2021 Appl. Phys. Rev. 8 011307 Google Scholar
[50]	Wei Q H, Dai H L, Shan H R, Li H G, Cao Z Q, Chen X F 2021 Phys. Rev. B 104 235308 Google Scholar
[51]	Zhou J, Liang Y, Liu Z, Chu W, Zhang H, Yin D, Fang Z, Wu R, Zhang J, Chen W, Wang Z, Zhou Y, Wang M, Cheng Y 2021 Laser Photonics Rev. 15 2100030 Google Scholar
[52]	Kwek L C, Cao L, Luo W, Wang Y X, Sun S H, Wang X B, Liu A Q 2021 AAPPS Bull. 31 15 Google Scholar
[53]	Perets H B, Lahini Y, Pozzi F, Sorel M, Morandotti R, Silberberg Y 2008 Phys. Rev. Lett. 100 170506 Google Scholar
[54]	Harris N C, Steinbrecher G R, Prabhu M, Lahini Y, Mower J, Bunandar D, Chen C, Wong F N C, Baehr-Jones B, Hochberg M, Lloyd S, Englund D 2017 Nat. Photonics 11 447 Google Scholar
[55]	Owens J O, Broome M A, Biggerstaff D N, Goggin M E, Fedrizzi A, Linjordet T, Ams M, Marshall G D, Twamley J, Withford M J, White A G 2011 New J. Phys. 13 075003 Google Scholar
[56]	Sansoni L, Sciarrino F, Vallone G, Mataloni P, Crespi A, Ramponi R, Osellame R 2012 Phys. Rev. Lett. 108 010502 Google Scholar
[57]	Poulios K, Keil R, Fry D, Meinecke J D, Matthews J C, Politi A, Lobino M, Gräfe M, Heinrich M, Nolte S, Szameit A, O’Brien J L 2014 Phys. Rev. Lett. 112 143604 Google Scholar
[58]	Tang H, Lin X F, Feng Z, Chen J Y, Gao J, Sun K, Wang C Y, Lai P C, Xu X Y, Wang Y, Qiao L F, Yang A L, Jin X M 2018 Sci. Adv. 4 aat3174 Google Scholar
[59]	Jiao Z Q, Gao J, Zhou W H, Wang X W, Ren R J, Xu X Y, Qiao L F, Wang Y, Jin X M 2021 Optica 8 1129 Google Scholar
[60]	Ehrhardt M, Keil R, Maczewsky L J, Dittel C, Heinrich M, Szameit A 2021 Sci. Adv. 7 eabc5266 Google Scholar
[61]	Childs A M, Goldstone J 2004 Phys. Rev. A 70 022314 Google Scholar
[62]	Ambainis A 2003 Int. J. Quantum Inf. 1 507 Google Scholar
[63]	Shenvi N, Kempe J, Whaley K B 2003 Phys. Rev. A 67 052307 Google Scholar
[64]	Franco C D, Gettrick M M, Busch T 2011 Phys. Rev. Lett. 106 080502 Google Scholar
[65]	Kendon V M, Tamon C 2011 J. Comput. Theor. Nanosci. 8 422 Google Scholar
[66]	Mohseni M, Rebentrost P, Lloyd S, Guzik A A 2008 J. Chem. Phys. 129 174106 Google Scholar
[67]	Gamble J K, Friesen M, Zhou D, Joynt R, Coppersmith S N 2010 Phys. Rev. A. 81 052313 Google Scholar
[68]	Childs A M 2009 Phys. Rev. Lett. 102 180501 Google Scholar
[69]	Childs A M, Gosset D, Webb Z 2013 Science 339 791 Google Scholar
[70]	Childs A M, Farhi E, Gutmann S 2002 Quantum Inf Process 1 35 Google Scholar
[71]	Tang H, Di Franco C, Shi Z Y, He T S, Feng Z, Gao J, Sun K, Li Z M, Jiao Z Q, Wang T Y, Kim M S, Jin X M 2018 Nat. Photonics 12 754 Google Scholar
[72]	Shi Z Y, Tang H, Feng Z, Wang Y, Li Z M, Gao J, Chang Y J, Wang T Y, Dou J P, Zhang Z Y, Jiao Z Q, Zhou W H, Jin X M 2020 Optica 7 613 Google Scholar
[73]	Wang Y, Cui Z W, Lu Y H, Zhang X M, Gao J, Chang Y J, Yung M H, Jin X M 2020 Phys. Rev. Lett. 125 160502 Google Scholar
[74]	Aaronson S, Arkhipov A 2011 Proceedings of the Forty-third Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing California, San Jose, USA, June 6–8, 2011 p333
[75]	Bentivegna M, Spagnolo N, Vitelli C, et al. 2015 Sci. Adv. 1 e1400255 Google Scholar
[76]	Paesani S, Ding Y, Santagati R, Chakhmakhchyan L, Vigliar C, Rottwitt K, Oxenløwe L K, Wang J W, Thompson M G, Laing A 2019 Nat. Phys. 15 925 Google Scholar
[77]	Zhou W H, Gao J, Jiao Z Q, Wang X W, Ren R J, Pang X L, Qiao L F, Zhang C N, Yang T H, Jin X M 2022 Appl. Phys. Rev. 9 031408 Google Scholar
[78]	Zhong H S, Deng Y H, Qin J, Wang H, Chen M C, Peng L C, Luo Y H, Wu D, Gong S Q, Su H, Hu Y, Hu P, Yang X Y, Zhang W J, Li H, Li Y X, Jiang X, Gan L, Yang G W, You L X, Wang Z, Li L, Liu N L, Renema J J, Lu C Y, Pan J W 2021 Phys. Rev. Lett. 127 180502 Google Scholar
[79]	Gao J, Wang X W, Zhou W H, Jiao Z Q, Ren R J, Fu Y X, Qiao L F, Xu X Y, Zhang C N, Pang X L, Li H, Wang Y, Jin X M 2022 Chip 1 100007 Google Scholar
[80]	Madsen L S, Laudenbach F, Askarani M F, Rortais F, Vincent T, Bulmer J F, Miatto F M, Neuhaus L, Helt L G, Collins M J, Lita A E, Gerrits T, Nam S W, Vaidya V D, Menotti M, Dhand I, Vernon Z, Quesada N, Lavoie J 2022 Nature 606 75 Google Scholar
[81]	Plotnik Y, Rechtsman M C, Song D, Heinrich M, Zeuner J M, Nolte S, Lumer Y, Malkova N, Xu J J, Szameit A, Chen Z G, Segev M 2014 Nat. Mater. 13 57 Google Scholar
[82]	Rechtsman M C, Zeuner J M, Plotnik Y, Lumer Y, Podolsky D, Dreisow F, Nolte S, Segev M, Szameit A 2013 Nature 496 196 Google Scholar
[83]	Wang Y, Lu Y H, Mei F, Gao J, Li Z M, Tang H, Zhu S L, Jia S, Jin X M 2019 Phys. Rev. Lett. 122 193903 Google Scholar
[84]	Wang Y, Pang X L, Lu Y H, Gao J, Chang Y J, Qiao L F, Jiao Z Q, Tang H, Jin X M 2019 Optica 6 955 Google Scholar
[85]	Wang Y, Lu Y H, Gao J, Chang Y J, Ren R J, Jiao Z Q, Zhang Z Y, Jin X M 2022 Chip 1 100003 Google Scholar
[86]	Blanco-Redondo A, Bell B, Oren D, Eggleton B J, Segev M 2018 Science 362 568 Google Scholar
[87]	Barik S, Karasahin A, Flower C, Cai T, Miyake H, DeGottardi W, Hafezi M, Waks E 2018 Science 359 666 Google Scholar
[88]	Tambasco J L, Corrielli G, Chapman R J, Crespi A, Zilberberg O, Osellame R, Peruzzo A 2018 Sci. Adv. 4 eaat3187 Google Scholar
[89]	Wang M, Doyle C, Bell B, Collins M J, Magi E, Eggleton B J, Segev M, Blanco-Redondo A 2019 Nanophotonics 8 1327 Google Scholar
[90]	Mittal S, Orre V V, Goldschmidt E A, Hafezi M 2021 Nat. Photonics 15 542 Google Scholar

[1]	Huang Tian-Long, Wu Yong-Zheng, Ni Ming, Wang Shi, Ye Yong-Jin. Effects of quantum noise on Shor’s algorithm. Acta Physica Sinica, 2024, 73(5): 050301. doi: 10.7498/aps.73.20231414
[2]	Li Yan. Effects of long-range inter-particle interactions and isolated defect on quantum walks of two hard-core bosons in one-dimensional lattices. Acta Physica Sinica, 2023, 72(17): 170501. doi: 10.7498/aps.72.20230642
[3]	Li Tian-Yin, Xing Hong-Xi, Zhang Dan-Bo. Quantum computing based high-energy nuclear physics. Acta Physica Sinica, 2023, 72(20): 200303. doi: 10.7498/aps.72.20230907
[4]	Liu Han-Yang, Hua Nan, Wang Yi-Nuo, Liang Jun-Qing, Ma Hong-Yang. Three dimensional image encryption algorithm based on quantum random walk and multidimensional chaos. Acta Physica Sinica, 2022, 71(17): 170303. doi: 10.7498/aps.71.20220466
[5]	Jiang Yao-Yao, Zhang Wen-Bin, Chu Peng-Cheng, Ma Hong-Yang. Feedback search algorithm for multi-particle quantum walks over a ring based on permutation groups. Acta Physica Sinica, 2022, 71(3): 030201. doi: 10.7498/aps.71.20211000
[6]	Wang Yi-Nuo, Song Zhao-Yang, Ma Yu-Lin, Hua Nan, Ma Hong-Yang. Color image encryption algorithm based on DNA code and alternating quantum random walk. Acta Physica Sinica, 2021, 70(23): 230302. doi: 10.7498/aps.70.20211255
[7]	Lin Jian, Ye Meng, Zhu Jia-Wei, Li Xiao-Peng. Machine learning assisted quantum adiabatic algorithm design. Acta Physica Sinica, 2021, 70(14): 140306. doi: 10.7498/aps.70.20210831
[8]	Li Ying, Han Ze-Yao, Li Chao-Jian, Lü Jin, Yuan Xiao, Wu Bu-Jiao. Review on quantum advantages of sampling problems. Acta Physica Sinica, 2021, 70(21): 210201. doi: 10.7498/aps.70.20211428
[9]	Tian Yu-Ling, Feng Tian-Feng, Zhou Xiao-Qi. Collaborative quantum computation with redundant graph state. Acta Physica Sinica, 2019, 68(11): 110302. doi: 10.7498/aps.68.20190142
[10]	Yang Le, Li Kai, Dai Hong-Yi, Zhang Ming. A novel scheme of quantum state tomography based on quantum algorithms. Acta Physica Sinica, 2019, 68(14): 140301. doi: 10.7498/aps.68.20190157
[11]	An Zhi-Yun, Li Zhi-Jian. Properties of distribution and entanglement in discrete-time quantum walk with percolation. Acta Physica Sinica, 2017, 66(13): 130303. doi: 10.7498/aps.66.130303
[12]	Xue Xi-Ling, Chen Han-Wu, Liu Zhi-Hao, Zhang Bin-Bin. Search algorithm of structure anomalies in complete graph based on scattering quantum walk. Acta Physica Sinica, 2016, 65(8): 080302. doi: 10.7498/aps.65.080302
[13]	Wang Wen-Juan, Tong Pei-Qing. Dynamic behaviors of spreading in generalized Fibonacci time quasiperiodic quantum walks. Acta Physica Sinica, 2016, 65(16): 160501. doi: 10.7498/aps.65.160501
[14]	Wang Dan-Dan, Li Zhi-Jian. Resonance transmission of one-dimensional quantum walk with phase defects. Acta Physica Sinica, 2016, 65(6): 060301. doi: 10.7498/aps.65.060301
[15]	Chen Han-Wu, Li Ke, Zhao Sheng-Mei. Quantum walk search algorithm based on phase matching and circuit cmplementation. Acta Physica Sinica, 2015, 64(24): 240301. doi: 10.7498/aps.64.240301
[16]	Liu Yan-Mei, Chen Han-Wu, Liu Zhi-Hao, Xue Xi-Ling, Zhu Wan-Ning. Scattering quantum walk search algorithm on star graph. Acta Physica Sinica, 2015, 64(1): 010301. doi: 10.7498/aps.64.010301
[17]	Ren Chun-Nian, Shi Peng, Liu Kai, Li Wen-Dong, Zhao Jie, Gu Yong-Jian. Effects of initial states on continuous-time quantum walk in the optical waveguide array. Acta Physica Sinica, 2013, 62(9): 090301. doi: 10.7498/aps.62.090301
[18]	Feng MingMing, Qin XiaoLin, Zhou ChunYuan, Xiong Li, Ding LiangEn. Quantum random number generator based on polarization. Acta Physica Sinica, 2003, 52(1): 72-76. doi: 10.7498/aps.52.72
[19]	LIAO JING, LIANG CHUANG, WEI YA-JUN, WU LING-AN, PAN SHAO-HUA, YAO DE-CHENG. TRUE RANDOM NUMBER GENERATOR BASED ON A PHOTON BEAMSPLITTER. Acta Physica Sinica, 2001, 50(3): 467-472. doi: 10.7498/aps.50.467
[20]	WANG CHIH-CHIANG. THE RUBY OPTICAL MASER. Acta Physica Sinica, 1964, 20(1): 63-71. doi: 10.7498/aps.20.63

Catalog

Vol. 71, Issue 24 - 2022-12-20

Metrics

Abstract views: 7303
PDF Downloads: 420
Cited By: 0

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

Search

Article

留言板