-
Dual-wavelength mode-locked lasers can be widely used in optical communication, pump-probe experiment, nonlinear frequency conversion, etc. In this paper, a dual-wavelength self-mode-locked semiconductor disk laser is reported for the first time, to the best of our knowledge. A simple linear resonator is formed by using a high reflectivity distributed Bragg reflector at the bottom of the gain chip, and an external output mirror; the cavity length is about 135 mm, with no need of additional inserted elements. Based on the Kerr effect of the gain medium and the soft aperture formed by the pump spot on the gain chip, along with the fine adjustment of cavity length and pump intensity, the mode-locking process can be started from the free running and the stable self-mode-locking can be realized. The mode-locked pulse width is 4.3 ps, the repetition rate is 1.1 GHz, and the maximum output power is 323.9 mW, which corresponds to a peak power of 68 W. After the laser is mode locked, a readily available blade, which can introduce a wavelength-dependent loss for different laser modes, resulting in a lager cavity loss for a longer-wavelength mode and a smaller cavity loss for a shorter-wavelength mode, is used as a wavelength tuning element, and is inserted into the cavity in the direction perpendicular to the optical axis of the resonator. By changing the depth of the blade inserted into the cavity, the laser wavelength can be continuously tuned from the initial oscillating wavelength (longer-wavelength) to a shorter wavelength, a stable dual-wavelength output with equal intensity can be obtained at a specific position, and the stable continuous-wave mode-locking can be maintained simultaneously. The steady dual-wavelengths in the experiment are 951 and 961 nm, and the corresponding output power is 32 mW. The above dual-wavelength outputs have good coherence since they are stimulated radiations from the same gain chip. Meanwhile, they have relatively high peak power and strictly meet the coaxial conditions, and these are all advantages for the difference frequency generation (DFG). The frequency of the DFG in the experiment is approximately 3.3 THz, which can be widely used in laser radar, remote sensing, homeland security, counter-terrorism, atmospheric and environmental monitoring and otherareas.
-
Keywords:
- dual-wavelength /
- self-mode-locking /
- semiconductor disk lasers /
- Kerr effect
[1] Guina M, Rantamäki A, Härkönen A 2017 J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 50 383001Google Scholar
[2] Rahimi-Iman A 2016 J. Opt.-UK. 18 093003Google Scholar
[3] Calvez S, Hastie J E, Guina M, Okhotnikov O G, Dawson M. D 2009 Laser Photonics Rev. 3 407Google Scholar
[4] Esposito E, Keatings S, Gardner K, Harris J, Riis E, McConnell G 2008 Rev. Sci. Instrum. 79 083702Google Scholar
[5] Wang C L, Chuang Y H, Pan C L 1995 Opt. Lett. 20 1071Google Scholar
[6] Khalighi M A, Uysal M 2014 IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutorials 16 2231Google Scholar
[7] Chen Y F, Tsai S W, Wang S C, Huang Y C, Lin T C, Wong B C 2002 Opt. Lett. 27 1809Google Scholar
[8] Leinonen T, Morozov Y A, Harkonen A, Pessa M 2005 IEEE Photonics Technol. Lett. 17 2508Google Scholar
[9] Fan L, Fallahi M, Hader J, Zakharian A R, Moloney J V, Stolz W, Koch S W, Bedford R, Murray J T 2007 Appl. Phys. Lett. 90 181124Google Scholar
[10] Hessenius C, Terry N, Fallahi M, Moloney J, Bedford R 2010 Opt. Lett. 35 3060Google Scholar
[11] Hessenius C, Lukowski M, Fallahi M 2012 Appl. Phys. Lett. 101 121110Google Scholar
[12] Scheller M, Koch S W, Moloney J V 2012 Opt. Lett. 37 25Google Scholar
[13] Zhang F, Gaafar M, Möller C, Stolz W, Koch M, Rahimi-Iman A 2016 IEEE Photonics Technol. Lett. 28 927Google Scholar
[14] 邱小浪, 王爽爽, 张晓健, 朱仁江, 张鹏, 郭于鹤洋, 宋晏蓉 2019 68 114204Google Scholar
Qiu X L, Wang S S, Zhang X J, Zhu R J, Zhang P, Guo Y H Y, Song Y R 2019 Acta Phys. Sin. 68 114204Google Scholar
[15] Zhang P, Mao L, Zhang X, Wang T, Wang L, Zhu R 2021 Opt. Express 29 16572Google Scholar
[16] Scheller M, Baker C W, Koch S W, Moloney J V, Jones R J 2017 IEEE Photonics Technol. Lett. 29 790Google Scholar
[17] De S, Baili G, Alouini M, Harmand J C, Bouchoule S, Bretenaker F 2014 Opt. Lett. 39 5586Google Scholar
[18] Tilma B W, Mangold M, Zaugg C A, Link S M, Waldburger D, Klenner A, Mayer A S, Gini E, Golling M, Keller U 2015 Light-Sci. Appl. 4 e310Google Scholar
[19] Good J T, Holland D B, Finneran I A, Carroll P B, Kelley M J, Blake G A 2015 Rev. Sci. Instrum. 86 103107Google Scholar
[20] Miller D A B 2000 IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron. 6 1312Google Scholar
[21] Keller U 2003 Nature 424 831Google Scholar
[22] Liu X, Yao X, Cui Y 2018 Phys. Rev. Lett. 121 023905Google Scholar
[23] Liu X, Pang M 2019 Laser Photonics Rev. 13 1800333Google Scholar
[24] Hoogland S, Dhanjal S, Tropper A C, Roberts J S, Haring R, Paschotta R, Morier-Genoud F, Keller U 2000 IEEE Photonics Technol. Lett. 12 1135Google Scholar
[25] Gaafar M A, Rahimi-Iman A, Fedorova K A, Stolz W, Rafailov E U, Koch M 2016 Adv. Opt. Photonics 8 370Google Scholar
[26] Chen Y F, Lee Y C, Liang H C, Lin K Y, Su K W, Huang K F 2011 Opt. Lett. 36 4581Google Scholar
[27] Kornaszewski L, Maker G, Malcolm G P A, Butkus M, Rafailov E U, Hamilton C J 2012 Laser Photonics Rev. 6 L20Google Scholar
[28] Bek R, Großmann M, Kahle H, Koch M, Rahimi-Iman A, Jetter M, Michler P 2017 Appl. Phys. Lett. 111 182105Google Scholar
[29] Albrecht A R, Wang Y, Ghasemkhani M, Seletskiy D V, Cederberg J G, Sheik-Bahae M 2013 Opt. Express 21 28801Google Scholar
[30] Cong Z, Tang D, De Tan W, Zhang J, Xu C, Luo D, Xu X, Li D, Xu J, Zhang X, Wang Q 2011 Opt. Express 19 3984Google Scholar
[31] Scheller M, Baker C W, Koch S W, Moloney J V 2016 IEEE Photonics Technol. Lett. 28 1325Google Scholar
-
图 3 锁模脉冲的射频频谱, 其中1.1 GHz的基频信号即为脉冲的重复频率, 该值与自锁模SDLs的135 mm谐振腔长度严格对应
Figure 3. The RF spectrum of mode-locked pulse train, in which the fundamental frequency signal of 1.1 GHz is the repetition frequency of the mode-locked pulses, which strictly corresponds to the 135 mm resonator cavity length of the self-mode-locked SDLs.
-
[1] Guina M, Rantamäki A, Härkönen A 2017 J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 50 383001Google Scholar
[2] Rahimi-Iman A 2016 J. Opt.-UK. 18 093003Google Scholar
[3] Calvez S, Hastie J E, Guina M, Okhotnikov O G, Dawson M. D 2009 Laser Photonics Rev. 3 407Google Scholar
[4] Esposito E, Keatings S, Gardner K, Harris J, Riis E, McConnell G 2008 Rev. Sci. Instrum. 79 083702Google Scholar
[5] Wang C L, Chuang Y H, Pan C L 1995 Opt. Lett. 20 1071Google Scholar
[6] Khalighi M A, Uysal M 2014 IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutorials 16 2231Google Scholar
[7] Chen Y F, Tsai S W, Wang S C, Huang Y C, Lin T C, Wong B C 2002 Opt. Lett. 27 1809Google Scholar
[8] Leinonen T, Morozov Y A, Harkonen A, Pessa M 2005 IEEE Photonics Technol. Lett. 17 2508Google Scholar
[9] Fan L, Fallahi M, Hader J, Zakharian A R, Moloney J V, Stolz W, Koch S W, Bedford R, Murray J T 2007 Appl. Phys. Lett. 90 181124Google Scholar
[10] Hessenius C, Terry N, Fallahi M, Moloney J, Bedford R 2010 Opt. Lett. 35 3060Google Scholar
[11] Hessenius C, Lukowski M, Fallahi M 2012 Appl. Phys. Lett. 101 121110Google Scholar
[12] Scheller M, Koch S W, Moloney J V 2012 Opt. Lett. 37 25Google Scholar
[13] Zhang F, Gaafar M, Möller C, Stolz W, Koch M, Rahimi-Iman A 2016 IEEE Photonics Technol. Lett. 28 927Google Scholar
[14] 邱小浪, 王爽爽, 张晓健, 朱仁江, 张鹏, 郭于鹤洋, 宋晏蓉 2019 68 114204Google Scholar
Qiu X L, Wang S S, Zhang X J, Zhu R J, Zhang P, Guo Y H Y, Song Y R 2019 Acta Phys. Sin. 68 114204Google Scholar
[15] Zhang P, Mao L, Zhang X, Wang T, Wang L, Zhu R 2021 Opt. Express 29 16572Google Scholar
[16] Scheller M, Baker C W, Koch S W, Moloney J V, Jones R J 2017 IEEE Photonics Technol. Lett. 29 790Google Scholar
[17] De S, Baili G, Alouini M, Harmand J C, Bouchoule S, Bretenaker F 2014 Opt. Lett. 39 5586Google Scholar
[18] Tilma B W, Mangold M, Zaugg C A, Link S M, Waldburger D, Klenner A, Mayer A S, Gini E, Golling M, Keller U 2015 Light-Sci. Appl. 4 e310Google Scholar
[19] Good J T, Holland D B, Finneran I A, Carroll P B, Kelley M J, Blake G A 2015 Rev. Sci. Instrum. 86 103107Google Scholar
[20] Miller D A B 2000 IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron. 6 1312Google Scholar
[21] Keller U 2003 Nature 424 831Google Scholar
[22] Liu X, Yao X, Cui Y 2018 Phys. Rev. Lett. 121 023905Google Scholar
[23] Liu X, Pang M 2019 Laser Photonics Rev. 13 1800333Google Scholar
[24] Hoogland S, Dhanjal S, Tropper A C, Roberts J S, Haring R, Paschotta R, Morier-Genoud F, Keller U 2000 IEEE Photonics Technol. Lett. 12 1135Google Scholar
[25] Gaafar M A, Rahimi-Iman A, Fedorova K A, Stolz W, Rafailov E U, Koch M 2016 Adv. Opt. Photonics 8 370Google Scholar
[26] Chen Y F, Lee Y C, Liang H C, Lin K Y, Su K W, Huang K F 2011 Opt. Lett. 36 4581Google Scholar
[27] Kornaszewski L, Maker G, Malcolm G P A, Butkus M, Rafailov E U, Hamilton C J 2012 Laser Photonics Rev. 6 L20Google Scholar
[28] Bek R, Großmann M, Kahle H, Koch M, Rahimi-Iman A, Jetter M, Michler P 2017 Appl. Phys. Lett. 111 182105Google Scholar
[29] Albrecht A R, Wang Y, Ghasemkhani M, Seletskiy D V, Cederberg J G, Sheik-Bahae M 2013 Opt. Express 21 28801Google Scholar
[30] Cong Z, Tang D, De Tan W, Zhang J, Xu C, Luo D, Xu X, Li D, Xu J, Zhang X, Wang Q 2011 Opt. Express 19 3984Google Scholar
[31] Scheller M, Baker C W, Koch S W, Moloney J V 2016 IEEE Photonics Technol. Lett. 28 1325Google Scholar
Catalog
Metrics
- Abstract views: 5337
- PDF Downloads: 109
- Cited By: 0