-
The precision dynamic measurement of absolute gravity based on the cold atom interferometer can provide a new method for marine gravimetry, so that it has attracted more attention. Based on the homemade shipborne cold atom interferometric absolute gravity measurement system, we carry out a series of measurement experiments in a certain area of the South China Sea. Under dynamic conditions, the suppression of measurement noise is essential for the improvement of the measurement performance. According to the physical model of the measurement system, in this paper a data processing method is proposed based on the extended Kalman filter algorithm for the absolute gravity dynamic measurement. The observed atomic interference fringe data are filtered in the time domain to estimate the absolute gravity value. Based on this processing method, the sensitivity of absolute gravity measurement under the condition of ship speed less than 2.1 km/h is improved from 300.2 mGal/Hz1/2 to 136.8 mGal/Hz1/2 (T = 4 ms). Comparing the processed data with the data calculated from the earth gravity model (XGM2019), it is found that both of the data are in good agreement. These results confirm the effectiveness of the data processing method proposed in this paper, and provide a new processing method of suppressing the measurement noise of shipborne cold atom interferometric absolute gravity measurement system.
-
Keywords:
- cold atomic gravimeter /
- absolute gravity measurement /
- atomic interferometer /
- data analysis
[1] Kasevich M, Chu S 1992 Appl. Phys. B:Photophys. Laser Chem. 54 321Google Scholar
[2] Peters A, Chung K Y, Chu S 2001 Metrologia 38 25Google Scholar
[3] Bidel Y, Carraz O, Charriere R, Cadoret M, Zahzam N, Bresson A 2013 Appl. Phys. Lett. 102 144107Google Scholar
[4] Ménoret V, Vermeulen P, Le Moigne N, Bonvalot S, Bouyer P, Landragin A, Desruelle B 2018 Sci. Rep. 8 1
[5] Fu Z, Wang Q, Wang Z, Wu B, Cheng B, Lin Q 2019 Chin. Opt. Lett. 17 011204Google Scholar
[6] Huang P W, Tang B, Chen X, Zhong J Q, Xiong Z Y, Zhou L, Wang J, Zhan M S 2019 Metrologia 56 045012Google Scholar
[7] Jiang Z, Palinkas V, Arias F E, et al. 2012 Metrologia 49 666Google Scholar
[8] Farah T, Guerlin C, Landragin A, Bouyer P, Gaffet S, Dos Santos F P, Merlet S 2014 Gyroscopy and Navigation 5 266Google Scholar
[9] Gillot P, Francis O, Landragin A, Dos Santos F P, Merlet S 2014 Metrologia 51 L15Google Scholar
[10] Freier C, Hauth M, Schkolnik V, Leykauf B, Schilling M, Wziontek H, Scherneck H G, Muller J, Peters A 2016 J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 723 012050Google Scholar
[11] Geiger R, Menoret V, Stern G, Zahzam N, Cheinet P, Battelier B, Villing A, Moron F, Lours M, Bidel Y, Bresson A, Landragin A, Bouyer P 2011 Nat. Commun. 2 474Google Scholar
[12] Fu Z J, Wu B, Cheng B, Zhou Y, Weng K X, Zhu D, Wang Z Y, Lin Q 2019 Metrologia 56 025001Google Scholar
[13] Wu X, Pagel Z, Malek B S, Nguyen T H, Zi F, Scheirer D S, Muller H 2019 Sci. Adv. 5 eaax0800Google Scholar
[14] 吴彬, 周寅, 程冰, 朱栋, 王凯楠, 朱欣欣, 陈佩军, 翁堪兴, 杨秋海, 林佳宏, 张凯军, 王河林, 林强 2020 69 060302Google Scholar
Wu B, Zhou Y, Cheng B, Zhu D, Wang K N, Zhu X X, Chen P J, Weng K X, Yang Q H, Lin J H, Zhang K J, Wang H L, Lin Q 2020 Acta Phys. Sin. 69 060302Google Scholar
[15] Wu S, Feng J, Li C, Su D, Wang Q, Hu R, Mou L 2021 J. Geod. 95 63Google Scholar
[16] 程冰, 周寅, 陈佩军, 张凯军, 朱栋, 王凯楠, 翁堪兴, 王河林, 彭树萍, 王肖隆, 吴彬, 林强 2021 70 040304Google Scholar
Cheng B, Zhou Y, Chen P J, Zhang K J, Zhu D, Wang K N, Weng K X, Wang H L, Peng S P, Wang X L, Wu B, Lin Q 2021 Acta Phys. Sin. 70 040304Google Scholar
[17] Bidel Y, Zahzam N, Bresson A, Blanchard C, Cadoret M, Olesen A V, Forsberg R 2020 J. Geod. 94 20Google Scholar
[18] Bidel Y, Zahzam N, Blanchard C, Bonnin A, Cadoret M, Bresson A, Rouxel D, Lequentrec-Lalancette M F 2018 Nat. Commun. 9 627Google Scholar
[19] Merlet S, Le Goueet J, Bodart Q, Clairon A, Landragin A, Dos Santos F P, Rouchon P 2009 Metrologia 46 87Google Scholar
[20] Reif K, Gunther S, Yaz E, Unbehauen R 1999 IEEE Trans. Autom. Control 44 714Google Scholar
[21] Kappl J J 1971 IEEE Trans. Aerosp. Electron. Syst. aes-7 79
[22] Sastry V A, Noton A R M 1971 IEEE Trans. Autom. Control 16 260Google Scholar
[23] Canciani A, Raquet J 2012 Proceedings of the 2012 International Technical Meeting of The Institute of Navigation, 2012 pp151–185
[24] Tennstedt B, Schön S 2021 Proceedings of 28th St. Petersburg International Conference on Integrated Navigation Systems, 2021
[25] Jiménez-Martínez R, Kołodyński J, Troullinou C, Lucivero V G, Kong J, Mitchell M W 2018 Phys. Rev. Lett. 120 040503Google Scholar
[26] Cheiney P, Fouche L, Templier S, Napolitano F, Battelier B, Bouyer P, Barrett B 2018 Phys. Rev. Appl. 10 034030Google Scholar
[27] Wu B, Zhu D, Cheng B, Wu L, Wang K, Wang Z, Shu Q, Li R, Wang H, Wang X, Lin Q 2019 Opt. Express 27 11252Google Scholar
[28] 吴彬, 程冰, 付志杰, 朱栋, 周寅, 翁堪兴, 王肖隆, 林强 2018 67 190302Google Scholar
Wu B, Cheng B, Fu Z-J, Zhu D, Zhou Y, Weng K X, Wang X L, Lin Q 2018 Acta Phys. Sin. 67 190302Google Scholar
[29] Cheinet P, Canuel B, Dos Santos F P, Gauguet A, Yver-Leduc F, Landragin A 2008 IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas. 57 1141Google Scholar
[30] Zingerle P, Pail R, Gruber T, Oikonomidou X 2020 J. Geod. 94 1Google Scholar
[31] Zhu D, Zhou Y, Wu B, Weng K, Wang K, Cheng B, Lin Q 2021 Appl. Opt. 60 7910Google Scholar
[32] Gauguet A, Mehlstäubler T E, Lévèque T, Gouët J L, Chaibi O, Canuel B, Clairon A, Santos F P D, Landragin A 2008 Phys. Rev. A 78 4702
[33] Baumann H, Klingele E E, Marson I 2012 Geophys. Prospect. 60 361Google Scholar
-
图 8 动态绝对重力数据处理结果 (a)使用不同算法获得的绝对重力值; (b)修正系统误差后的绝对重力值; (c)绝对重力值gEst与由重力模型计算的结果的残差数据
Figure 8. Comparison of the absolute gravity data: (a) Absolute gravity values obtained by the different algorithms; (b) absolute gravity values obtained after correcting the systematic errors; (c) the residual data between the absolute gravity values gEst and the calculated results based on the gravity model.
-
[1] Kasevich M, Chu S 1992 Appl. Phys. B:Photophys. Laser Chem. 54 321Google Scholar
[2] Peters A, Chung K Y, Chu S 2001 Metrologia 38 25Google Scholar
[3] Bidel Y, Carraz O, Charriere R, Cadoret M, Zahzam N, Bresson A 2013 Appl. Phys. Lett. 102 144107Google Scholar
[4] Ménoret V, Vermeulen P, Le Moigne N, Bonvalot S, Bouyer P, Landragin A, Desruelle B 2018 Sci. Rep. 8 1
[5] Fu Z, Wang Q, Wang Z, Wu B, Cheng B, Lin Q 2019 Chin. Opt. Lett. 17 011204Google Scholar
[6] Huang P W, Tang B, Chen X, Zhong J Q, Xiong Z Y, Zhou L, Wang J, Zhan M S 2019 Metrologia 56 045012Google Scholar
[7] Jiang Z, Palinkas V, Arias F E, et al. 2012 Metrologia 49 666Google Scholar
[8] Farah T, Guerlin C, Landragin A, Bouyer P, Gaffet S, Dos Santos F P, Merlet S 2014 Gyroscopy and Navigation 5 266Google Scholar
[9] Gillot P, Francis O, Landragin A, Dos Santos F P, Merlet S 2014 Metrologia 51 L15Google Scholar
[10] Freier C, Hauth M, Schkolnik V, Leykauf B, Schilling M, Wziontek H, Scherneck H G, Muller J, Peters A 2016 J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 723 012050Google Scholar
[11] Geiger R, Menoret V, Stern G, Zahzam N, Cheinet P, Battelier B, Villing A, Moron F, Lours M, Bidel Y, Bresson A, Landragin A, Bouyer P 2011 Nat. Commun. 2 474Google Scholar
[12] Fu Z J, Wu B, Cheng B, Zhou Y, Weng K X, Zhu D, Wang Z Y, Lin Q 2019 Metrologia 56 025001Google Scholar
[13] Wu X, Pagel Z, Malek B S, Nguyen T H, Zi F, Scheirer D S, Muller H 2019 Sci. Adv. 5 eaax0800Google Scholar
[14] 吴彬, 周寅, 程冰, 朱栋, 王凯楠, 朱欣欣, 陈佩军, 翁堪兴, 杨秋海, 林佳宏, 张凯军, 王河林, 林强 2020 69 060302Google Scholar
Wu B, Zhou Y, Cheng B, Zhu D, Wang K N, Zhu X X, Chen P J, Weng K X, Yang Q H, Lin J H, Zhang K J, Wang H L, Lin Q 2020 Acta Phys. Sin. 69 060302Google Scholar
[15] Wu S, Feng J, Li C, Su D, Wang Q, Hu R, Mou L 2021 J. Geod. 95 63Google Scholar
[16] 程冰, 周寅, 陈佩军, 张凯军, 朱栋, 王凯楠, 翁堪兴, 王河林, 彭树萍, 王肖隆, 吴彬, 林强 2021 70 040304Google Scholar
Cheng B, Zhou Y, Chen P J, Zhang K J, Zhu D, Wang K N, Weng K X, Wang H L, Peng S P, Wang X L, Wu B, Lin Q 2021 Acta Phys. Sin. 70 040304Google Scholar
[17] Bidel Y, Zahzam N, Bresson A, Blanchard C, Cadoret M, Olesen A V, Forsberg R 2020 J. Geod. 94 20Google Scholar
[18] Bidel Y, Zahzam N, Blanchard C, Bonnin A, Cadoret M, Bresson A, Rouxel D, Lequentrec-Lalancette M F 2018 Nat. Commun. 9 627Google Scholar
[19] Merlet S, Le Goueet J, Bodart Q, Clairon A, Landragin A, Dos Santos F P, Rouchon P 2009 Metrologia 46 87Google Scholar
[20] Reif K, Gunther S, Yaz E, Unbehauen R 1999 IEEE Trans. Autom. Control 44 714Google Scholar
[21] Kappl J J 1971 IEEE Trans. Aerosp. Electron. Syst. aes-7 79
[22] Sastry V A, Noton A R M 1971 IEEE Trans. Autom. Control 16 260Google Scholar
[23] Canciani A, Raquet J 2012 Proceedings of the 2012 International Technical Meeting of The Institute of Navigation, 2012 pp151–185
[24] Tennstedt B, Schön S 2021 Proceedings of 28th St. Petersburg International Conference on Integrated Navigation Systems, 2021
[25] Jiménez-Martínez R, Kołodyński J, Troullinou C, Lucivero V G, Kong J, Mitchell M W 2018 Phys. Rev. Lett. 120 040503Google Scholar
[26] Cheiney P, Fouche L, Templier S, Napolitano F, Battelier B, Bouyer P, Barrett B 2018 Phys. Rev. Appl. 10 034030Google Scholar
[27] Wu B, Zhu D, Cheng B, Wu L, Wang K, Wang Z, Shu Q, Li R, Wang H, Wang X, Lin Q 2019 Opt. Express 27 11252Google Scholar
[28] 吴彬, 程冰, 付志杰, 朱栋, 周寅, 翁堪兴, 王肖隆, 林强 2018 67 190302Google Scholar
Wu B, Cheng B, Fu Z-J, Zhu D, Zhou Y, Weng K X, Wang X L, Lin Q 2018 Acta Phys. Sin. 67 190302Google Scholar
[29] Cheinet P, Canuel B, Dos Santos F P, Gauguet A, Yver-Leduc F, Landragin A 2008 IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas. 57 1141Google Scholar
[30] Zingerle P, Pail R, Gruber T, Oikonomidou X 2020 J. Geod. 94 1Google Scholar
[31] Zhu D, Zhou Y, Wu B, Weng K, Wang K, Cheng B, Lin Q 2021 Appl. Opt. 60 7910Google Scholar
[32] Gauguet A, Mehlstäubler T E, Lévèque T, Gouët J L, Chaibi O, Canuel B, Clairon A, Santos F P D, Landragin A 2008 Phys. Rev. A 78 4702
[33] Baumann H, Klingele E E, Marson I 2012 Geophys. Prospect. 60 361Google Scholar
Catalog
Metrics
- Abstract views: 5688
- PDF Downloads: 167
- Cited By: 0