-
Supercritical carbon dioxide has gradually been becoming an important research subject in the academic field due to the fact that it has a promising application prospect in the field of extraction, precipitation, thermodynamic cycle and chemical reaction. In recent years, the interest in studying the region near the critical point was aroused and a large variation of the physical properties could be detected due to the change of temperature and pressure. The rapid development of molecular simulation technology benefits the traditional experimental methods to study the variations of relevant physical properties in the near-critical region. In order to find out the Widom line range of supercritical carbon dioxide in the near-critical region and the molecular structure characteristics of the liquid-like gas region, both the molecular dynamics simulation technology and the cluster analysis are used to investigate the relation between variation coefficient and skewness of CO2 density time series with Widom line and liquid-gas-like interval, under the condition of the temperature and pressure range of 300–350 K and 5.5–18.5 MPa, respectively. The results show that the Widom line of supercritical carbon dioxide in the near-critical region can be determined by connecting the maximum coefficient of variation of the density time series curve. The Widom line begins to extend along with the critical point until it stops at 350 K. The molecular distribution structure of supercritical carbon dioxide liquid-like region and gas-like region can be differentiated by the skewness of the number density distributions. The skewness is positive in the gas-like region, but negative in the liquid-like region, and reaches the maximum at the Widom line.
[1] Bolmatov D, Brazhkin V V, Trachenko K 2013 Nat. Commun. 4 2331
Google Scholar
[2] Mecheri M, Moullec Y L 2016 Energy 103 758
Google Scholar
[3] Stanley H E, Ahlers G 1973 Phys. Today 26 71
[4] Lee J, Cho S K, Cha J E, Lee J I 2016 ASME Turbo Expo 2016: Turbomachinery Technical Conference and Exposition
[5] Clarke D D, Vasquez V R, Whiting W B, Greiner M 2001 Appl. Therm. Eng. 21 993
Google Scholar
[6] Xu L, Kumar P, Buldyrev S V, Chen S H, Poole P H, Sciortino F, Stanley H E 2005 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 102 46
[7] Nishikawa K, Tanaka I, Amemiya Y 1996 J. Phys. Chem. 100 418
Google Scholar
[8] Nishikawa K, Morita T 1997 J. Chem. Phys. 101 1413
Google Scholar
[9] Nishikawa K, Kusano K, Arai A A, Morita T 2003 J. Chem. Phys. 118 1341
Google Scholar
[10] Simeoni G, Bryk T, Gorelli F, Krisch M, Ruocco G, Santoro M, Scopigno T 2010 Nat. Phys. 6 503
Google Scholar
[11] Brazhkin V V, Fomin Y D, Lyapin A G, Ryzhov V N, Tsiok E N 2011 J. Phys. Chem. B 115 14112
Google Scholar
[12] Sedunov B 2012 Am. J. Anal. Chem. 3 899
Google Scholar
[13] Bolmatov D, Zhernenkov M, Zav’yalov D, Tkachev S N, Cunsolo A, Cai Y Q 2015 Sci. Rep. 5 15850
Google Scholar
[14] Mareev E, Aleshkevich V, Potemkin F, Bagratashvili V, Minaev N, Gordienko V 2018 Opt. Express 26 13229
Google Scholar
[15] Mareev E I, Aleshkevich V A, Potemkin F V, Minaev N V, Gordienko V M 2019 Sverhkriticheskie Flyuidy: Teoriya i Praktika 14 89
Google Scholar
[16] 孙辉, 章立新, 杨其国, 高明, 刘婧楠 2020 热力发电 49 59
Sun H, Zhang L X, Yang Q G, Gao M, Liu J N 2020 Thermal Power Generation 49 59
[17] 孙辉, 章立新, 杨其国, 刘婧楠, 高明 2021 动力工程学报 41 426
Sun H, Zhang L X, Yang Q G, Liu J N, Gao M 2021 J. Power Eng. 41 426
[18] Imre A R, Deiters U K, Kraska T, Tiselj I 2012 Nucl. Eng. Des. 252 179
Google Scholar
[19] Imre A R, Ramboz C, Deiters U K, Kraska T 2015 Environ. Earth Sci. 73 4373
Google Scholar
[20] Shinoda W, Shiga M, Mikami M 2004 Physi. Rev. B 69 134103
Google Scholar
[21] Kamberaj H, Low R J, Neal M P 2005 J. Chem. Phys. 122 1055
[22] Aimoli C G, Maginn E J, Abreu C R A 2014 Fluid Phase Equilibria 368 80
Google Scholar
[23] Xu J, Liu C, Sun E, Xie J, Liu J 2019 Energy 186 115831
Google Scholar
[24] Stubbs J M 2016 J. Supercrit. Fluids 108 104
Google Scholar
[25] Chen L, Wang S Y, Tao W Q 2019 Energy 179 1094
Google Scholar
[26] Kuznetsova T, Kvamme B 2002 Energy Convers. Manage. 43 2601
Google Scholar
[27] Harris J G, Yung K H 1995 J. Phys. Chem. 99 12021
Google Scholar
[28] Linstrom P J, Mallard W G 2001 Nat. Inst. Stand. Technol.
[29] 叶仁道, 刘干, 薛洁 2016 统计学 (西安: 西安电子科技大学出版社) 第83页
Ye R D, Liu G, Xue J 2016 Statistica (Xi’an: Xidian University Press) p83 (in Chinese)
-
图 1 物理模型
Figure 1. Physical model.
图 2 模拟参数范围
Figure 2. Range of simulation parameters.
图 3 不同温度下CO2的定压比热
Figure 3. Specific heat of CO2 under constant pressure at different temperatures.
图 4 密度时间序列曲线
Figure 4. Density time series curve.
图 5 密度时间序列曲线变异系数
Figure 5. Coefficient of variation of density time series curve.
图 6 Widom线的确定
Figure 6. Determination of Widom Line.
图 7 NIST计算结果同变异系数比较
Figure 7. NIST results were compared with coefficient of variation.
图 8 不同压力下偏度
Figure 8. Different pressure of skewness.
图 9 分子聚类在P-T图中的表示
Figure 9. Representation of molecular clustering in a P-T plot.
表 1 EPM2力场[27]模型参数
Table 1. Force field model parameter.
参数 化学键 εij/(kJ·mol–1) C—C 0.2335 εij/(kJ·mol–1) O—O 0.6690 σij/Å C—C 2.7570 σij/Å O—O 3.0330 $ {r}_{0} $/Å C—O 1.149 q/e C +0.6512 q/e O –0.3256 θ0/(°) — 180.0 
DownLoad: CSV
表 2 密度时间序列标准差
Table 2. Density time series standard deviation.
标准差 压力/MPa 300 K 305 K 310 K 315 K 320 K 330 K 340 K 350 K 5.5 0.013109 0.011901 0.01103 0.010102 0.009666 0.008618 — — 6.5 0.021126 0.018254 0.016068 0.01389 0.013573 0.011374 — 7.5 0.044269* 0.035315 0.024742 0.021213 0.018383 0.015038 0.02127 — 8.5 0.034966 0.052095* 0.069753* 0.034734 0.026997 0.019459 0.026351 0.026077 9.5 0.029418 0.038274 0.060415 0.089464* 0.045076 0.02814 0.034613 0.031747 10.5 0.028961 0.032362 0.041841 0.061074 0.076358* 0.039398 0.040408 0.035494 11.5 0.026782 0.030041 0.035246 0.045652 0.063877 0.052485 0.045546 0.041854 12.5 0.025495 0.028665 0.032302 0.036694 0.046283 0.055389* 0.045615 0.041477 13.5 0.024154 0.025742 0.02983 0.033077 0.039802 0.051153 0.046138* 0.042967* 14.5 0.023595 0.025523 0.0279 0.030757 0.035307 0.044592 0.042004 0.038225 15.5 0.022976 0.024029 0.025872 0.027699 0.030845 0.037294 0.037411 0.037828 *上标表示标准差最大值.
DownLoad: CSV
表 3 密度时间序列曲线偏度
Table 3. Skewness of density time series curve.
偏度 压力/MPa 300 K 305 K 310 K 315 K 320 K 330 K 340 K 350 K 5.5 0.210666 0.19667 0.222613 0.199038 0.177194 0.122592 — — 6.5 0.317677 0.387051 0.331934 0.171015 0.203137 0.149934 — — 7.5 –0.58527 0.978992 0.539219 0.271725 0.196513 0.247196 0.331706 — 8.5 –0.35354 –0.75044 1.678176 0.55835 0.445696 0.302657 0.340462 0.269658 9.5 –0.25597 –0.34136 –0.61173 0.571848 0.76617 0.322709 0.42415 0.291239 10.5 –0.21121 –0.17076 –0.31933 –0.39196 0.31758 0.471969 0.332677 0.223912 11.5 –0.18831 –0.06063 –0.36301 –0.41968 –0.27132 0.386004 0.199494 0.269035 12.5 –0.07006 –0.15883 –0.14411 –0.15565 –0.27415 0.227356 –0.03969 0.180661 13.5 –0.09053 –0.1045 –0.1583 –0.15022 –0.20128 –0.06513 0.000758 0.104961 14.5 –0.11188 –0.24015 –0.18414 –0.20055 –0.16249 –0.153 –0.03519 0.102933 15.5 –0.16482 –0.09686 –0.16086 –0.07727 –0.0917 –0.19393 –0.00103 0.02764
DownLoad: CSV
-
[1] Bolmatov D, Brazhkin V V, Trachenko K 2013 Nat. Commun. 4 2331
Google Scholar
[2] Mecheri M, Moullec Y L 2016 Energy 103 758
Google Scholar
[3] Stanley H E, Ahlers G 1973 Phys. Today 26 71
[4] Lee J, Cho S K, Cha J E, Lee J I 2016 ASME Turbo Expo 2016: Turbomachinery Technical Conference and Exposition
[5] Clarke D D, Vasquez V R, Whiting W B, Greiner M 2001 Appl. Therm. Eng. 21 993
Google Scholar
[6] Xu L, Kumar P, Buldyrev S V, Chen S H, Poole P H, Sciortino F, Stanley H E 2005 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 102 46
[7] Nishikawa K, Tanaka I, Amemiya Y 1996 J. Phys. Chem. 100 418
Google Scholar
[8] Nishikawa K, Morita T 1997 J. Chem. Phys. 101 1413
Google Scholar
[9] Nishikawa K, Kusano K, Arai A A, Morita T 2003 J. Chem. Phys. 118 1341
Google Scholar
[10] Simeoni G, Bryk T, Gorelli F, Krisch M, Ruocco G, Santoro M, Scopigno T 2010 Nat. Phys. 6 503
Google Scholar
[11] Brazhkin V V, Fomin Y D, Lyapin A G, Ryzhov V N, Tsiok E N 2011 J. Phys. Chem. B 115 14112
Google Scholar
[12] Sedunov B 2012 Am. J. Anal. Chem. 3 899
Google Scholar
[13] Bolmatov D, Zhernenkov M, Zav’yalov D, Tkachev S N, Cunsolo A, Cai Y Q 2015 Sci. Rep. 5 15850
Google Scholar
[14] Mareev E, Aleshkevich V, Potemkin F, Bagratashvili V, Minaev N, Gordienko V 2018 Opt. Express 26 13229
Google Scholar
[15] Mareev E I, Aleshkevich V A, Potemkin F V, Minaev N V, Gordienko V M 2019 Sverhkriticheskie Flyuidy: Teoriya i Praktika 14 89
Google Scholar
[16] 孙辉, 章立新, 杨其国, 高明, 刘婧楠 2020 热力发电 49 59
Sun H, Zhang L X, Yang Q G, Gao M, Liu J N 2020 Thermal Power Generation 49 59
[17] 孙辉, 章立新, 杨其国, 刘婧楠, 高明 2021 动力工程学报 41 426
Sun H, Zhang L X, Yang Q G, Liu J N, Gao M 2021 J. Power Eng. 41 426
[18] Imre A R, Deiters U K, Kraska T, Tiselj I 2012 Nucl. Eng. Des. 252 179
Google Scholar
[19] Imre A R, Ramboz C, Deiters U K, Kraska T 2015 Environ. Earth Sci. 73 4373
Google Scholar
[20] Shinoda W, Shiga M, Mikami M 2004 Physi. Rev. B 69 134103
Google Scholar
[21] Kamberaj H, Low R J, Neal M P 2005 J. Chem. Phys. 122 1055
[22] Aimoli C G, Maginn E J, Abreu C R A 2014 Fluid Phase Equilibria 368 80
Google Scholar
[23] Xu J, Liu C, Sun E, Xie J, Liu J 2019 Energy 186 115831
Google Scholar
[24] Stubbs J M 2016 J. Supercrit. Fluids 108 104
Google Scholar
[25] Chen L, Wang S Y, Tao W Q 2019 Energy 179 1094
Google Scholar
[26] Kuznetsova T, Kvamme B 2002 Energy Convers. Manage. 43 2601
Google Scholar
[27] Harris J G, Yung K H 1995 J. Phys. Chem. 99 12021
Google Scholar
[28] Linstrom P J, Mallard W G 2001 Nat. Inst. Stand. Technol.
[29] 叶仁道, 刘干, 薛洁 2016 统计学 (西安: 西安电子科技大学出版社) 第83页
Ye R D, Liu G, Xue J 2016 Statistica (Xi’an: Xidian University Press) p83 (in Chinese)
DownLoad:
Catalog
Metrics
- Abstract views: 7250
- PDF Downloads: 159
- Cited By: 0
