Status and prospective of high-efficiency c-Si solar cells based on tunneling oxide passivation contacts

Ren Cheng-Chao; Zhou Jia-Kai; Zhang Bo-Yu; Liu Zhang; Zhao Ying; Zhang Xiao-Dan; Hou Guo-Fu

doi:10.7498/aps.70.20210316

Abstract

Current photovoltaic market is dominated by crystalline silicon (c-Si) solar modules and this status will last for next decades. Among all high-efficiency c-Si solar cells, the tunnel oxide passivated contact (TOPCon) solar cell has attracted much attention due to its excellent passivation and compatibility with the traditional c-Si solar cells. The so-called tunnel oxide passivated contact (TOPCon) consists of an ultra-thin silicon oxide layer less than 2 nm in thickness and a heavily doped poly-Si layer, which is used for implementing effective passivation and selective collection of carriers. This TOPCon solar cell has some advantages including no laser contact opening, no light-induced degradation and no elevated temperature-induced degradation because of N-type c-Si wafer, compatibility with high temperature sintering and technical scalability. This paper first introduces the basic structure and principles of TOPCon solar cells, then compares the existing methods of preparing ultra-thin silicon oxide layer and heavily doped poly-Si layer, and finally points out the future research direction of this cell based on the analysis of the current research status.

Keywords:

Authors and contacts

1.
Institute of Photoelectronic Thin Film Devices and Technology of Nankai University, Tianjin 300350, China
2.
Key Laboratory of Photoelectronic Thin Film Devices and Technology of Tianjin, Tianjin 300350, China
3.
Engineering Center of Thin Film Photoelectronic Technology of Ministry of Education, Tianjin 300350, China
4.
Sino-Euro Joint Research Center for Photovoltaic Power Generation of Tianjin, Tianjin 300350, China

Corresponding author: Hou Guo-Fu, gfhou@nankai.edu.cn

Funds: Project supported by the National Key R&D Program of China (Grant No. 2018YFB1500402) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 62074084).

FullText HTML : translate this paragraph

References

[1]	李志学, 吴硕锋, 雷理钊 2018 价格月刊 12 1 Li Z X, Wu S F, Lei L Z 2018 Prices Monthly 12 1
[2]	邵杰, 钱黄俊 2018 绿色环保建材 12 229 Shao J, Qian H J 2018 Green Environ. Protect. Build. Mater. 12 229
[3]	Battaglia C, Cuevas A, Wolf D S 2016 Energ. Environ. Sci. 9 1552 Google Scholar
[4]	陈晨, 张巍, 贾锐, 张代生, 邢钊, 金智, 刘新宇 2013 中国科学 43 708 Chen C, Zhang W, Jia R, Zhang D S, Xing Z, Jin Z, Liu X Y 2013 Sci. Chin. 43 708
[5]	李嘉亮 2015 电子世界 16 57 Google Scholar Li J L 2015 Electronics World 16 57 Google Scholar
[6]	Rehman A U, Lee S H 2013 Sci. World J. 11 470347
[7]	Chapin D M, Fuller C S, Pearson G L 1954 J. Appl. Phys. 25 676 Google Scholar
[8]	Schmidt J, Peibst R, Brendel R 2019 Silicon PV 201 9
[9]	Richter A, Hermle M, Glunz S W 2013 IEEE J Photovolt. 3 1184 Google Scholar
[10]	Chen D, Chen Y, Wang Z, Gong J, Liu C, Zou Y, He Y, Wang Y, Yuan L, Lin W, Xia R, Yin L, Zhang X, Xu G, Yang Y, Shen H, Feng Z, Altermatt P P, Verlinden P J 2020 Sol. Energ. Mat. Sol. C. 206 110258 Google Scholar
[11]	Testpv https://m.sohu.com/a/443128332_749304/ [2021-01-07]
[12]	Liu Z F 2019 15th CSPV Shanghai, China, November 21–23, 2019
[13]	Haase F, Hollemann C, Schfer S, Merkle A, Riencker M, Krügener J, Brendel R, Peibst R 2018 Sol. Energ. Mat. Sol. C. 186 184 Google Scholar
[14]	Richter A, Benick J, Feldmann F, Fell F, Hermle M, Glunz S W 2017 Sol. Energ. Mat. Sol. C. 173 96 Google Scholar
[15]	Richter A, Benick J, Fell A, Hermle M, Glunz S W 2018 Prog. Photovoltaics 1
[16]	中国可再生能源学会光伏专业委员会 2020 太阳能 12 320 Chinese R E S 2020 Solar Energy 12 320
[17]	Blakers A W, Wang A, Milne A M, Zhao J, Green M A 1989 Appl. Phys. Lett. 55 1363 Google Scholar
[18]	Green M A, Blakers A W, Zhao J, Milne A M, Wang A, Dai X 1990 IEEE T. Electron. Dev. 37 331 Google Scholar
[19]	Schneiderlchner E, Preu R, Lüdemann R, Glunz S W 2002 Prog. Photovoltaics 10 29 Google Scholar
[20]	Wang A, Zhao J, Green M A 1990 Appl. Phys. Lett. 57 602 Google Scholar
[21]	Zhao J, Green M A 1991 IEEE T. Electron. Dev. 38 1925 Google Scholar
[22]	史济群 1994 华中理工大学学报(自然科学版) 9 1
[23]	Feldmann F, Bivour M, Reichel C, Hermle M, Glunz S W 2014 Sol. Energ. Mat. Sol. C. 120 270 Google Scholar
[24]	刘恩科, 朱秉升, 罗晋生 1994 半导体物理学 (北京: 国防工业出版社) 第146页 Liu E K, Zhu B S, Luo J S 1994 Semiconductor Physical (Beijing: National Defense Industry Press) p146 (in Chinese)
[25]	Schroder D K 1998 Semiconductor Material and Device Characterization (New York: Wiley-IEEE Press) pp107–108
[26]	Sze S M, Ng K K 2006 Phys. Semi. Dev. 8 5
[27]	Tao Y, Upadhyaya V, Jones K, Rohatgi A 2016 AIMS Mat. Sci. 3 180
[28]	Rohatgi A, Rounsaville B, Ok Y-W, Tam A M, Zimbardi F, Upadhyaya A D, Tao Y, Madani K, Richter A, Benick J, Hermle M 2017 IEEE J. Photovolt. 7 1236 Google Scholar
[29]	Glunz S W, Feldmann F 2018 Sol. Energ. Mat. Sol. C. 185 260 Google Scholar
[30]	Shewchun J, Singh R, Green M 1977 J. Appl. Phys. 48 765 Google Scholar
[31]	Lancaster K, Groer S, Feldmann F, Naumann V, Hagendorf C 2016 Energ. Procedia 92 116 Google Scholar
[32]	Matsumoto T, Hirose R, Shibata F, Ishibashi D, Ogawara S, Kobayashi H 2015 Sol. Energ. Mat. Sol. C. 134 298 Google Scholar
[33]	Matsumoto T, Nakajima H, Irishika D, Nonaka T, Imamura K, Kobayashi H 2017 Appl. Surf. Sci. 395 56 Google Scholar
[34]	Kim H, Bae S, Ji K, Kim S M, Yang J W, Lee C H, Lee K D, Kim S, Kang Y, Lee H, Kim D 2017 Appl. Surf. Sci. 409 140 Google Scholar
[35]	Moldovan A, Feldmann F, Kaufmann K, Richter S, Werner M, Hagendorf C, Zimmer M, Rentsch J, Hermle M 2015 2015 IEEE 42nd PVSC (LA: Orleans IEEE) p1
[36]	Moldovan A, Feldmann F, Krugel G, Zimmer M, Rentsch J, Hermle M, Roth-F Flsch A, Kaufmann K, Hagendorf C 2014 Energ. Procedia 55 834 Google Scholar
[37]	Moldovan A, Feldmann F, Zimmer M, Rentsch J, Benick J, Hermle M 2015 Sol. Energ. Mat. Sol. C. 142 123 Google Scholar
[38]	Yan D, Cuevas A, Wan Y, Bullock J 2016 Sol. Energ. Mat. Sol. C. 152 73 Google Scholar
[39]	Jeon M, Kang J, Shim G, Ahn S, Balaji N, Park C, Lee Y, Yi J 2017 Vacuum 141 152 Google Scholar
[40]	Ron Y, Raveh A, Carmi U, Inspektop A, Avni R 1983 Thin Solid Films 107 181 Google Scholar
[41]	Tong J, Wang X, Ouyang Z, Lennon A 2015 Energ. Procedia 77 840 Google Scholar
[42]	Stegemann B, Gad K M, Balamou P, Sixtensson D, Vssing D, Kasemann M, Angermann H 2017 Appl. Surf. Sci. 395 78 Google Scholar
[43]	Fong K C, Kho T C, Liang W S, Chong T K, Ernst M, Walter D, Stocks M, Franklin E, Mclntosh K, Blakers A 2018 Sol. Energ. Mat. Sol. C. 186 236 Google Scholar
[44]	Stodolny M K, Anker J, Geerligs B L, Janssen G J, Loo B W, Melskens J, Santbergen R, Isabella O, Schmitz J, Lenes M, Luchies J M, Kessels W M, Romijn I 2017 Energ. Procedia 124 635 Google Scholar
[45]	Yang G T, Ingenito A, Isabella O, Zeman M 2016 Sol. Energ. Mat. Sol. C. 158 84 Google Scholar
[46]	Rmer U, Merkle A, Peibst R, Ohrdes T, Lim B, Krügener, Brendel R 2014 29th European Photovoltaic Solar Energy Conference, Amsterdam, September 22–26, 2014, p1107
[47]	Yan D, Cuevas A, Phang S P, Wan Y, Macdonald D 2018 Appl. Phys. Lett. 113 061603 Google Scholar
[48]	Yang Q, Liao M, Wang Z, Zheng J, Lin Y, Guo X, Zeng Y, Yan B, Ye J 2020 Sol. Energ. Mat. Sol. C. 210 110518 Google Scholar
[49]	Park H J, Park H, Park S J, Bae S, Kim H, Yang J W, Hyun J Y, Lee C H, Shin S H, Kang Y, Lee H S, Kim D 2019 Sol. Energ. Mat. Sol. C. 189 21 Google Scholar
[50]	Xu Z, Ke T, Jiang S, Jia R, Li W, Zhou Y, Jin Z, Liu X 2020 Sol. Energ. Mat. Sol. C. 206 110329 Google Scholar
[51]	Yang G, Guo P, Paul P, Weeber A, Isabella O, Zeman M 2018 Phys. Lett. 112 193904
[52]	Liu J, Yao Y, Xiao S, Gu X 2018 Appl. Phys. 51 123001
[53]	Schnabel M, Loo B W, Nemeth W, Macco B, Stradins P, Kessels M, Young David 2018 Appl. Phys. Lett. 112 203901 Google Scholar
[54]	Feldmann F, Bivour M, Reichel C, Steinkemper H, Hermle M, Glunz S W 2014 Sol. Energ. Mat. Sol. C. 131 46 Google Scholar
[55]	Benick J, Hoex B, Sanden M C, Kessels W M, Schultz O, Glunz S W 2008 Appl. Phys. Lett. 92 253504 Google Scholar
[56]	Peibst R, Larionova Y, Reiter S, Turcu M, Brendel R, Tetzlaff D, Krügener, Wietler T, Hhne U, Khler J D, Mehlich H, Frigge S 2016 32 nd European Photovoltaic Solar Energy Conference and Exhibition, Munich, June 22-24 2016 pp323
[57]	Rmer U, Peibst R, Ohrdes T, Lim B, Krügener J, Bugiel E, Wietler T, Brendel R 2014 Sol. Energ. Mat. Sol. C 131 85 Google Scholar
[58]	Riencker M, Merkle A, Rmer U, Kohlenberg H, Krügener J, Brendel R, Peibst R 2016 Energ. Procedia 92 412 Google Scholar
[59]	Zeng Y H, Yang Q, Wan Y, Yang Z, Liao M, Huang Y, Zhang Z, Guo X, Wang Z, Gao P, Wu C H, Yan B, Ye J 2019 Solar Energy 178 249 Google Scholar
[60]	Nogay G, Sahli F, Werner J, Monnard R, Boccard M, Despeisse M, Haug F-J, Jeangros Q, Ingenito A, Ballif C 2019 ACS Energy Lett. 4 844 Google Scholar
[61]	Shen H P, Omelchenko S T, Jacobs D A, Yalamanchili S, Wan Y M, Yan D, Phang P, Duong T, Wu Y L, Yin Y T, Samundsett C, Peng J, Wu N D, White T P, Andersson G G, Lewis N S, Catchpole K R 2018 Sci. Adv. 4 9711 Google Scholar

Cited By

图 1 钝化接触太阳电池中载流子的输运过程

Figure 1. Carrier transport in passivated contact solar cell.

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

图 2 TOPCon电池能带图^[28]

Figure 2. Energy band diagram of TOPCon cell^[28].

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

图 3 汞蒸气灯的示意图和反应机理^[36]

Figure 3. Schematic diagram and reaction mechanism of mercury vapor lamp^[36].

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

图 4 三种氧化法制备的TOPCon对称钝化结构在不同的氧化时间和退火温度后的iV_oc^[37]

Figure 4. Implied open circuit voltage of TOPCon passivation structure prepared by three oxidation methods after different oxidation time and annealing temperature^[37].

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

图 5 不同氧化法得到氧化层的XPS光谱　(a) SiO_x/Si界面的Si 2p光谱及拟合厚度; (b)不同氧化技术得到的SiO_x层的化学计量比^[42]

Figure 5. XPS spectra of oxide layers obtained by different oxidation methods：(a) Si 2p spectra and fitting thickness of SiO_x/ Si interface; (b) stoichiometry of SiO_x layers obtained by different oxidation technologies^[42].

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

图 6 研究的电池结构　(a)具有N⁺多晶硅BSF的N- RISE BJBC电池; (b)具有常规c-Si BSF的参考N-RISE BJBC电池^[46]

Figure 6. Structure of the studied cell: (a) N- RISE BJBC cell with N⁺ polysilicon BSF; (b) reference n-rise BJBC cell with conventional c-Si BSF ^[46].

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

图 7 (a)具有poly-Si后接触和poly-SiC_x前接触的TOPCon太阳电池光照下的电流-电压(Ⅳ)曲线; (b)具有不同窗口层的太阳电池的外部量子效率(EQE)^[50]

Figure 7. (a) Current voltage (Ⅳ) curves of TOPCon solar cells with poly-Si back contact and poly-SiC_x front contact under illumination；(b) external quantum efficiency (EQE) of solar cells with different window layers^[50].

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

图 8 隧穿氧化层钝化接触太阳电池结构图^[23]

Figure 8. Structure of passivated contact solar cell with tunneling oxide layer^[23].

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

图 9 PANDA-TOPCon结构的太阳电池结构图

Figure 9. Structure of PANDA-TOPCon solar cell.

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

图 10 POLO电池的基本结构图^[56]

Figure 10. Basic structure of POLO cell^[56].

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

表 1 基于隧穿氧化物钝化接触的高效晶体硅太阳电池的研究简况表

Table 1. Research status and prospective of high-efficiency c-Si solar cells based on tunneling oxide passivation contacts.

Institution	Type	E_ff/ %	V_oc/ mV	J_sc/ (mA·cm^–2)	FF/ %	Area/ cm²	Year
Trina	N-type i-TOPCon	24.58	717	40.6	84.5	244.31	2020^[10]
JinkoSolar/AUO	N-type TOPCon	24.90	712.8	41.68	83.84	235.80	2021^[11]
中来	N-type TOPCon	23.19	701	39.9	83	246.21	2019^[12]
ISFH	P-type POLO	26.1	726.6	42.62	84.28	4	2018^[13]
Frauhofer ISE	N-type TOPCon	25.8	724	42.9	83.1	4	2017^[14]
Frauhofer ISE	N-type TOPCon	24.5	713	41.4	83.1	100	2017^[15]
Frauhofer ISE	N-type TOPCon	23.4	697	41.1	81.2	200	2018^[16]

DownLoad: CSV

表 2 氧化层制备方法优缺点对比

Table 2. Comparison of advantages and disadvantages of oxide layer preparation methods.

方法	优点	缺点
硝酸氧化硅片法(NAOS)	制备方法简单, 制备温度相对较低, 硝酸溶液可重复利用, 氧化层薄膜质量好^[32,33]	硝酸具有强氧化性, 且硝酸蒸汽对人体有害, 对环境也会造成污染
过氧化氢法(H₂O₂)	生成物污染小, 不会对人产生危害, 制备方法简单^[34]	H₂O₂的氧化性较弱, 为提高SiO_x的质量需额外进行退火处理
臭氧去离子氧化法(DIO₃)	具有良好的界面钝化效果^[35,36]	设备昂贵且维护成本较高
UV/O₃ 光解法	可以在UV光的照射下有效地取出Si片表面的有机残留物^[36,37]	制备工艺复杂, 且厚度均匀性相对较差
热氧化法	容易获得较高质量的SiO_x, 且 Si/SiO_x的界面态密度也非常低^[38]	漏电流密度大, 且高温带来的预算也很高
等离子体辅助N₂O氧化法	可以实现超薄SiO_x层和非晶硅层在 PECVD 中的一次沉积 ^[39,40]	厚度不易精确控制
阳极氧化方法	场致阳极化(FIA)可以均匀地形成超薄隧道氧化硅层 ^[41]	可能会导致隧道氧化层界面呈现出较低的空穴势垒能量

DownLoad: CSV

表 3 掺杂层制备方法优缺点对比

Table 3. Comparison of advantages and disadvantages of doping layer preparation method.

方法	优点	缺点
LPCVD	产量高, 可以直接制备n型的多晶硅层	会产生绕镀, 效率相对较低
PECVD	可以进行单面制备, 效率高	产量低, 对设备要求高, 且对环境有污染
溅射法	无污染, 操作简单且安全	均匀性相对较差, 退火温度想对较高

DownLoad: CSV

map

[1]	李志学, 吴硕锋, 雷理钊 2018 价格月刊 12 1 Li Z X, Wu S F, Lei L Z 2018 Prices Monthly 12 1
[2]	邵杰, 钱黄俊 2018 绿色环保建材 12 229 Shao J, Qian H J 2018 Green Environ. Protect. Build. Mater. 12 229
[3]	Battaglia C, Cuevas A, Wolf D S 2016 Energ. Environ. Sci. 9 1552 Google Scholar
[4]	陈晨, 张巍, 贾锐, 张代生, 邢钊, 金智, 刘新宇 2013 中国科学 43 708 Chen C, Zhang W, Jia R, Zhang D S, Xing Z, Jin Z, Liu X Y 2013 Sci. Chin. 43 708
[5]	李嘉亮 2015 电子世界 16 57 Google Scholar Li J L 2015 Electronics World 16 57 Google Scholar
[6]	Rehman A U, Lee S H 2013 Sci. World J. 11 470347
[7]	Chapin D M, Fuller C S, Pearson G L 1954 J. Appl. Phys. 25 676 Google Scholar
[8]	Schmidt J, Peibst R, Brendel R 2019 Silicon PV 201 9
[9]	Richter A, Hermle M, Glunz S W 2013 IEEE J Photovolt. 3 1184 Google Scholar
[10]	Chen D, Chen Y, Wang Z, Gong J, Liu C, Zou Y, He Y, Wang Y, Yuan L, Lin W, Xia R, Yin L, Zhang X, Xu G, Yang Y, Shen H, Feng Z, Altermatt P P, Verlinden P J 2020 Sol. Energ. Mat. Sol. C. 206 110258 Google Scholar
[11]	Testpv https://m.sohu.com/a/443128332_749304/ [2021-01-07]
[12]	Liu Z F 2019 15th CSPV Shanghai, China, November 21–23, 2019
[13]	Haase F, Hollemann C, Schfer S, Merkle A, Riencker M, Krügener J, Brendel R, Peibst R 2018 Sol. Energ. Mat. Sol. C. 186 184 Google Scholar
[14]	Richter A, Benick J, Feldmann F, Fell F, Hermle M, Glunz S W 2017 Sol. Energ. Mat. Sol. C. 173 96 Google Scholar
[15]	Richter A, Benick J, Fell A, Hermle M, Glunz S W 2018 Prog. Photovoltaics 1
[16]	中国可再生能源学会光伏专业委员会 2020 太阳能 12 320 Chinese R E S 2020 Solar Energy 12 320
[17]	Blakers A W, Wang A, Milne A M, Zhao J, Green M A 1989 Appl. Phys. Lett. 55 1363 Google Scholar
[18]	Green M A, Blakers A W, Zhao J, Milne A M, Wang A, Dai X 1990 IEEE T. Electron. Dev. 37 331 Google Scholar
[19]	Schneiderlchner E, Preu R, Lüdemann R, Glunz S W 2002 Prog. Photovoltaics 10 29 Google Scholar
[20]	Wang A, Zhao J, Green M A 1990 Appl. Phys. Lett. 57 602 Google Scholar
[21]	Zhao J, Green M A 1991 IEEE T. Electron. Dev. 38 1925 Google Scholar
[22]	史济群 1994 华中理工大学学报(自然科学版) 9 1
[23]	Feldmann F, Bivour M, Reichel C, Hermle M, Glunz S W 2014 Sol. Energ. Mat. Sol. C. 120 270 Google Scholar
[24]	刘恩科, 朱秉升, 罗晋生 1994 半导体物理学 (北京: 国防工业出版社) 第146页 Liu E K, Zhu B S, Luo J S 1994 Semiconductor Physical (Beijing: National Defense Industry Press) p146 (in Chinese)
[25]	Schroder D K 1998 Semiconductor Material and Device Characterization (New York: Wiley-IEEE Press) pp107–108
[26]	Sze S M, Ng K K 2006 Phys. Semi. Dev. 8 5
[27]	Tao Y, Upadhyaya V, Jones K, Rohatgi A 2016 AIMS Mat. Sci. 3 180
[28]	Rohatgi A, Rounsaville B, Ok Y-W, Tam A M, Zimbardi F, Upadhyaya A D, Tao Y, Madani K, Richter A, Benick J, Hermle M 2017 IEEE J. Photovolt. 7 1236 Google Scholar
[29]	Glunz S W, Feldmann F 2018 Sol. Energ. Mat. Sol. C. 185 260 Google Scholar
[30]	Shewchun J, Singh R, Green M 1977 J. Appl. Phys. 48 765 Google Scholar
[31]	Lancaster K, Groer S, Feldmann F, Naumann V, Hagendorf C 2016 Energ. Procedia 92 116 Google Scholar
[32]	Matsumoto T, Hirose R, Shibata F, Ishibashi D, Ogawara S, Kobayashi H 2015 Sol. Energ. Mat. Sol. C. 134 298 Google Scholar
[33]	Matsumoto T, Nakajima H, Irishika D, Nonaka T, Imamura K, Kobayashi H 2017 Appl. Surf. Sci. 395 56 Google Scholar
[34]	Kim H, Bae S, Ji K, Kim S M, Yang J W, Lee C H, Lee K D, Kim S, Kang Y, Lee H, Kim D 2017 Appl. Surf. Sci. 409 140 Google Scholar
[35]	Moldovan A, Feldmann F, Kaufmann K, Richter S, Werner M, Hagendorf C, Zimmer M, Rentsch J, Hermle M 2015 2015 IEEE 42nd PVSC (LA: Orleans IEEE) p1
[36]	Moldovan A, Feldmann F, Krugel G, Zimmer M, Rentsch J, Hermle M, Roth-F Flsch A, Kaufmann K, Hagendorf C 2014 Energ. Procedia 55 834 Google Scholar
[37]	Moldovan A, Feldmann F, Zimmer M, Rentsch J, Benick J, Hermle M 2015 Sol. Energ. Mat. Sol. C. 142 123 Google Scholar
[38]	Yan D, Cuevas A, Wan Y, Bullock J 2016 Sol. Energ. Mat. Sol. C. 152 73 Google Scholar
[39]	Jeon M, Kang J, Shim G, Ahn S, Balaji N, Park C, Lee Y, Yi J 2017 Vacuum 141 152 Google Scholar
[40]	Ron Y, Raveh A, Carmi U, Inspektop A, Avni R 1983 Thin Solid Films 107 181 Google Scholar
[41]	Tong J, Wang X, Ouyang Z, Lennon A 2015 Energ. Procedia 77 840 Google Scholar
[42]	Stegemann B, Gad K M, Balamou P, Sixtensson D, Vssing D, Kasemann M, Angermann H 2017 Appl. Surf. Sci. 395 78 Google Scholar
[43]	Fong K C, Kho T C, Liang W S, Chong T K, Ernst M, Walter D, Stocks M, Franklin E, Mclntosh K, Blakers A 2018 Sol. Energ. Mat. Sol. C. 186 236 Google Scholar
[44]	Stodolny M K, Anker J, Geerligs B L, Janssen G J, Loo B W, Melskens J, Santbergen R, Isabella O, Schmitz J, Lenes M, Luchies J M, Kessels W M, Romijn I 2017 Energ. Procedia 124 635 Google Scholar
[45]	Yang G T, Ingenito A, Isabella O, Zeman M 2016 Sol. Energ. Mat. Sol. C. 158 84 Google Scholar
[46]	Rmer U, Merkle A, Peibst R, Ohrdes T, Lim B, Krügener, Brendel R 2014 29th European Photovoltaic Solar Energy Conference, Amsterdam, September 22–26, 2014, p1107
[47]	Yan D, Cuevas A, Phang S P, Wan Y, Macdonald D 2018 Appl. Phys. Lett. 113 061603 Google Scholar
[48]	Yang Q, Liao M, Wang Z, Zheng J, Lin Y, Guo X, Zeng Y, Yan B, Ye J 2020 Sol. Energ. Mat. Sol. C. 210 110518 Google Scholar
[49]	Park H J, Park H, Park S J, Bae S, Kim H, Yang J W, Hyun J Y, Lee C H, Shin S H, Kang Y, Lee H S, Kim D 2019 Sol. Energ. Mat. Sol. C. 189 21 Google Scholar
[50]	Xu Z, Ke T, Jiang S, Jia R, Li W, Zhou Y, Jin Z, Liu X 2020 Sol. Energ. Mat. Sol. C. 206 110329 Google Scholar
[51]	Yang G, Guo P, Paul P, Weeber A, Isabella O, Zeman M 2018 Phys. Lett. 112 193904
[52]	Liu J, Yao Y, Xiao S, Gu X 2018 Appl. Phys. 51 123001
[53]	Schnabel M, Loo B W, Nemeth W, Macco B, Stradins P, Kessels M, Young David 2018 Appl. Phys. Lett. 112 203901 Google Scholar
[54]	Feldmann F, Bivour M, Reichel C, Steinkemper H, Hermle M, Glunz S W 2014 Sol. Energ. Mat. Sol. C. 131 46 Google Scholar
[55]	Benick J, Hoex B, Sanden M C, Kessels W M, Schultz O, Glunz S W 2008 Appl. Phys. Lett. 92 253504 Google Scholar
[56]	Peibst R, Larionova Y, Reiter S, Turcu M, Brendel R, Tetzlaff D, Krügener, Wietler T, Hhne U, Khler J D, Mehlich H, Frigge S 2016 32 nd European Photovoltaic Solar Energy Conference and Exhibition, Munich, June 22-24 2016 pp323
[57]	Rmer U, Peibst R, Ohrdes T, Lim B, Krügener J, Bugiel E, Wietler T, Brendel R 2014 Sol. Energ. Mat. Sol. C 131 85 Google Scholar
[58]	Riencker M, Merkle A, Rmer U, Kohlenberg H, Krügener J, Brendel R, Peibst R 2016 Energ. Procedia 92 412 Google Scholar
[59]	Zeng Y H, Yang Q, Wan Y, Yang Z, Liao M, Huang Y, Zhang Z, Guo X, Wang Z, Gao P, Wu C H, Yan B, Ye J 2019 Solar Energy 178 249 Google Scholar
[60]	Nogay G, Sahli F, Werner J, Monnard R, Boccard M, Despeisse M, Haug F-J, Jeangros Q, Ingenito A, Ballif C 2019 ACS Energy Lett. 4 844 Google Scholar
[61]	Shen H P, Omelchenko S T, Jacobs D A, Yalamanchili S, Wan Y M, Yan D, Phang P, Duong T, Wu Y L, Yin Y T, Samundsett C, Peng J, Wu N D, White T P, Andersson G G, Lewis N S, Catchpole K R 2018 Sci. Adv. 4 9711 Google Scholar

[1]	Xu Chang, Zheng Dexu, Dong Xinrui, Wu SaJian, Wu MingXing, Wang Kai, Liu Shengzhong(Frank). Research progress of perovskite-based triple-junction tandem solar cells. Acta Physica Sinica, 2024, 73(24): . doi: 10.7498/aps.73.20241187
[2]	Wang Shi-Dong, Yan Ya-Ting, Wang Rui-Ying, Zhu Zhi-Li, Gu Jin-Hua. Cesium doping for improving performance of inverse-graded 2D (CMA)₂MA₈Pb₉I₂₈ perovskite film and solar cells. Acta Physica Sinica, 2023, 72(13): 138801. doi: 10.7498/aps.72.20230357
[3]	Pan Hong-Ying, Quan Zhi-Jue. Effects of p-layer hole concentration and thickness on performance of p-i-n InGaN homojunction solar cells. Acta Physica Sinica, 2019, 68(19): 196103. doi: 10.7498/aps.68.20191042
[4]	Du Xiang, Chen Si, Lin Dong-Xu, Xie Fang-Yan, Chen Jian, Xie Wei-Guang, Liu Peng-Yi. Improvement of current characteristic of perovskite solar cells using dodecanedioic acid modified TiO2 electron transporting layer. Acta Physica Sinica, 2018, 67(9): 098801. doi: 10.7498/aps.67.20172779
[5]	Chen Xin-Liang, Chen Li, Zhou Zhong-Xin, Zhao Ying, Zhang Xiao-Dan. Progress of Cu2O/ZnO oxide heterojunction solar cells. Acta Physica Sinica, 2018, 67(11): 118401. doi: 10.7498/aps.67.20172037
[6]	Xiao You-Peng, Wang Tao, Wei Xiu-Qin, Zhou Lang. Physical mechanism and optimal design of silicon heterojunction solar cells. Acta Physica Sinica, 2017, 66(10): 108801. doi: 10.7498/aps.66.108801
[7]	Geng Chao, Zheng Yi, Zhang Yong-Zhe, Yan Hui. Optical design of nanowire array on silicon thin film solar cell. Acta Physica Sinica, 2016, 65(7): 070201. doi: 10.7498/aps.65.070201
[8]	Ding Dong, Yang Shi-E, Chen Yong-Sheng, Gao Xiao-Yong, Gu Jin-Hua, Lu Jing-Xiao. Numerical simulation of light absorption enhancement in microcrystalline silicon solar cells with Al nanoparticle arrays. Acta Physica Sinica, 2015, 64(24): 248801. doi: 10.7498/aps.64.248801
[9]	Liu Chang-Wen, Zhou Xun, Yue Wen-Jin, Wang Ming-Tai, Qiu Ze-Liang, Meng Wei-Li, Chen Jun-Wei, Qi Juan-Juan, Dong Chao. Hybrid polymer-based solar cells with metal oxides as the main electron acceptor and transporter. Acta Physica Sinica, 2015, 64(3): 038804. doi: 10.7498/aps.64.038804
[10]	Jia Xiao-Jie, Ai Bin, Xu Xin-Xiang, Yang Jiang-Hai, Deng You-Jun, Shen Hui. Two-dimensional device simulation and performance optimization of crystalline silicon selective-emitter solar cell. Acta Physica Sinica, 2014, 63(6): 068801. doi: 10.7498/aps.63.068801
[11]	Xu Zhong-Hua, Chen Wei-Bing, Ye Wei-Qiong, Yang Wei-Feng. A Study of tandem structure organic solar cells composed of polymer and small molecular sub-cells. Acta Physica Sinica, 2014, 63(21): 218801. doi: 10.7498/aps.63.218801
[12]	Cao Yu, Zhang Jian-Jun, Li Tian-Wei, Huang Zhen-Hua, Ma Jun, Ni Jian, Geng Xin-Hua, Zhao Ying. Optimization of the longitudinal structure of intrinsic layer in microcrystalline silicon germanium solar cell. Acta Physica Sinica, 2013, 62(3): 036102. doi: 10.7498/aps.62.036102
[13]	Han An-Jun, Sun Yun, Li Zhi-Guo, Li Bo-Yan, He Jing-Jing, Zhang Yi, Liu Wei. The high efficiency sub-micrometer Cu(In, Ga)Se2 solar cell prepared on low temperature. Acta Physica Sinica, 2013, 62(4): 048401. doi: 10.7498/aps.62.048401
[14]	Zheng Xue, Yu Xue-Gong, Yang De-Ren. Passivation property of -Si：H/SiNx stack-layer film in crystalline silicon solar cells. Acta Physica Sinica, 2013, 62(19): 198801. doi: 10.7498/aps.62.198801
[15]	Fang Xin, Shen Wen-Zhong. Oxygen and carbon behaviors in multi-crystalline silicon and their effect on solar cell conversion efficiency. Acta Physica Sinica, 2011, 60(8): 088801. doi: 10.7498/aps.60.088801
[16]	Yu Huang-Zhong, Wen Yuan-Xin. Influence of the thickness and cathode material on the performance of the polymer solar cell. Acta Physica Sinica, 2011, 60(3): 038401. doi: 10.7498/aps.60.038401
[17]	Zhou Chun-Lan, Li Xu-Dong, Wang Wen-Jing, Zhao Lei, Li Hai-Ling, Diao Hong-Wei, Cao Xiao-Ning. The effect of oxidation randomly textured up-pyramid on the silicon solar cell. Acta Physica Sinica, 2011, 60(3): 038201. doi: 10.7498/aps.60.038201
[18]	Xu Miao, Peng Jun-Biao. Effect of casting process of polymer active layer on performances of polymer solar cells. Acta Physica Sinica, 2010, 59(3): 2131-2136. doi: 10.7498/aps.59.2131
[19]	Cai Hong-Kun, Tao Ke, Wang Lin-Shen, Zhao Jing-Fang, Sui Yan-Ping, Zhang De-Xian. Interface treatment of amorphous silicon thin film solar cells on flexible substrate. Acta Physica Sinica, 2009, 58(11): 7921-7925. doi: 10.7498/aps.58.7921
[20]	Hu Zhi-Hua, Liao Xian-Bo, Diao Hong-Wei, Xia Chao-Feng, Xu Ling, Zeng Xiang-Bo, Hao Hui-Ying, Kong Guang-Lin. AMPS modeling of light J-V characteristics of a-Si based solar cells. Acta Physica Sinica, 2005, 54(5): 2302-2306. doi: 10.7498/aps.54.2302

Catalog

Vol. 70, Issue 17 - 2021-09-05

Metrics

Abstract views: 15534
PDF Downloads: 722
Cited By: 0

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

Search

Article

留言板