-
The single-layered molybdenum disulfide (
${\rm{Mo}}{{\rm{S}}_2}$ ) is a two-dimensional nanomaterial with wide potential applications due to its excellent electrical and frictional properties. However, there have been few investigations of its mechanical properties up to now, and researchers have not paid attention to its nonlinear mechanical properties under the multi-fields co-existing environment. The present paper proposed a nonlinear plate theory to model the effect of finite temperatures on the single-layered${\rm{Mo}}{{\rm{S}}_2}$ . It is similar to the classical plate theory that both the in-plane stretching deformation and the out-of-plane bending deformation are taken into account in the new theory. However, the new theory consists of two independent in-plane mechanical parameters and two independent out-of-plane mechanical parameters. Neither of the two out-of-plane mechanical parameters in the new theory, which describe the resistance of${\rm{Mo}}{{\rm{S}}_2}$ to the bending and the twisting, depends on the structure’s thickness. This reasonably avoids the Yakobson paradox: uncertainty stemming from the thickness of the single-layered two-dimensional structures will lead to the uncertainty of the structure’s out-of-plane stiffness. The new nonlinear plate equations are then solved approximately through the Galerkin method for the thermoelastic mechanical problems of the graphene and${\rm{Mo}}{{\rm{S}}_2}$ . The approximate analytic solutions clearly reveal the effects of temperature and structure stiffness on the deformations. Through comparing the results of two materials under combined temperature and load, it is found, for the immovable boundaries, that (1) the thermal stress, which is induced by the finite temperature, reduces the stiffness of${\rm{Mo}}{{\rm{S}}_2}$ , but increases the stiffness of graphene; (2) the significant difference between two materials is that the graphene’s in-plane stiffness is greater than the${\rm{Mo}}{{\rm{S}}_2}$ ’s, but the graphene’s out-of-plane stiffness is less than the${\rm{Mo}}{{\rm{S}}_2}$ ’s. Because the${\rm{Mo}}{{\rm{S}}_2}$ ’s bending stiffness is much greater than graphene’s, the graphene’s deformation is greater than MoS2’s with a small load. However, the graphene’s deformation is less than the${\rm{Mo}}{{\rm{S}}_2}$ ’s with a large load since the graphene’s in-plane stretching stiffness is greater than the MoS2’s. The present research shows that the applied axial force and ambient temperature can conveniently control the mechanical properties of single-layered two-dimensional nanostructures. The new theory provides the basis for the intensive research of the thermoelastic mechanical problems of${\rm{Mo}}{{\rm{S}}_2}$ , and one can easily apply the theory to other single-layered two-dimensional nanostructures.-
Keywords:
- single-layered MoS2 /
- graphene /
- thermal stress /
- nonlinear plate theory
[1] Tan C, Cao X, Wu X J, He Q, Yang J, Zhang X, Chen J, Zhao W, Han S, Nam G, Sindoro M, Zhang H 2017 Chem. Rev. 117 6225Google Scholar
[2] Pumera M, Sofer Z 2017 Adv. Mater. 29 1605299Google Scholar
[3] 王靖慧, 焦丽颖 2017 科学通报 62 2158Google Scholar
Wang J H, Jiao L Y 2017 Chin. Sci. Bull. 62 2158Google Scholar
[4] 王慧, 徐萌, 郑仁奎 2020 69 017301Google Scholar
Wang H, Xu M, Zheng R K 2020 Acta Phys. Sin. 69 017301Google Scholar
[5] Song X, Hu J, Zeng H 2013 J. Mater. Chem. C 1 2952Google Scholar
[6] Zhao J, Liu H, Yu Z, Quhe R, Zhou S, Wang Y, Liu C C, Zhong H, Han N, Lu J, Yao Y, Wu K 2016 Prog. Mater. Sci. 83 24Google Scholar
[7] 顾品超, 张楷亮, 冯玉林, 王芳, 苗银萍, 韩叶梅, 张韩霞 2016 65 018102Google Scholar
Gu P C, Zhang K L, Feng Y L, Wang F, Miao Y P, Han Y M, Zhang H X 2016 Acta Phys. Sin. 65 018102Google Scholar
[8] 魏争, 王琴琴, 郭玉拓, 李佳蔚, 时东霞, 张广宇 2018 67 128103Google Scholar
Wei Z, Wang Q Q, Guo Y T, Li J W, Shi D X, Zhang G Y 2018 Acta Phys. Sin. 67 128103Google Scholar
[9] Hong Y, Liu Z, Wang L, Zhou T, Ma W, Xu C, Feng S, Chen L, Chen M, Sun D, Sun D, Chen X, Chen H, Ren W 2020 Science 369 670Google Scholar
[10] 黄坤, 殷雅俊, 吴继业 2014 63 156201Google Scholar
Huang K, Yin Y J, Wu J Y 2014 Acta Phys. Sin. 63 156201Google Scholar
[11] 黄坤, 殷雅俊, 屈本宁, 吴继业 2014 力学学报 46 905Google Scholar
Huang K, Yin Y J, Qu B N, Wu J Y 2014 Chin. J. Theoret. Appl. Mechan. 46 905Google Scholar
[12] Cao K, Feng S, Han Y, Gao L, Lu Y 2020 Nat. Commun. 11 284Google Scholar
[13] Li X, Zhu H 2015 J. Materiomics 1 33Google Scholar
[14] Xiong S, Cao G 2016 Nanotechnology 27 105701Google Scholar
[15] Jiang J, Qi Z, Park H, Rabczuk T 2013 Nanotechnology 24 435705Google Scholar
[16] Late D, Shirodkar S, Waghmare U, Dravid V, Rao C 2014 Chemphyschem 15 1592Google Scholar
[17] Hu X, Yasaei P, Jokisaari J, Öğüt S, Salehi-Khojin A, Robert F, Klie R 2018 Phys. Rev. Lett. 120 055902
[18] Zhang R, Cao H, Jiang J 2020 Nanotechnology 31 405709Google Scholar
[19] Akinwande D, Brennan C, Bunch J, Egberts P, Felts J, Gao H, Huang R, Kim J, Li T, Li Y 2017 Extreme Mech. Lett. 23 42
[20] Wei Y, Yang R 2018 Natl. Sci. Rev. 6 324
[21] Chen S, Chrzan D C 2011 Phys. Rev. B 84 5409
[22] Jiang J, Wang B, Wang J 2015 J. Phys-Condens. Mat. 27 083001Google Scholar
[23] Zhou L, Cao G 2016 Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 18 1657Google Scholar
[24] Gao E, Xu Z 2015 J. Appl. Mech. 82 121012Google Scholar
[25] Audoly B, Pomeau Y 2010 Elasticity and Geometry: From Hair Curls to the Non-linear Response of Shells (New York: Oxford University Press) pp157-213
[26] Kudin K, Scuseria G, Yakobson B 2001 Phys. Rev. B 64 235406Google Scholar
[27] Landau L, Lifshitz E 1997 Theory of Elasticity 3rd (Oxford: Butterworth Heinemann) pp38−50
[28] O'NEILL B 2006 Elementary Differential Geometry (Singapore: Elsevier) pp364−376
[29] Eduard E, Krauthammer T 2001 Thin Plates and Shells: Theory, Analysis, and Applications (New York: Marcel Dekker) pp191−240
[30] 胡海昌 1981 弹性力学的变分原理及其应用 (北京: 科学出版社)pp322−342
Hu H 1981 Variational Principles of Theory of Elasticity with Applications (Beijing: Science Press) pp322−342 (in Chinese)
[31] Liu K, Yan Q, Chen M, Fan W, Sun Y, Suh J, Fu D, Lee S, Zhou J, Tongay S, Ji J, Neaton J, Wu J 2014 Nano Lett. 14 5097Google Scholar
[32] Cooper R C, Lee C, Marianetti C A, Wei X, Hone J, Kysar J W 2013 Phys. Rev. B 87 035423Google Scholar
[33] Xiong S, Cao G 2015 Nanotechnology 26 185705Google Scholar
[34] Luongo A, Egidio A 2005 Nonlinear. Dynam. 41 171Google Scholar
[35] Luongo A, D'Annibale F 2013 Int. J. Nonlin. Mech. 55 128Google Scholar
-
-
[1] Tan C, Cao X, Wu X J, He Q, Yang J, Zhang X, Chen J, Zhao W, Han S, Nam G, Sindoro M, Zhang H 2017 Chem. Rev. 117 6225Google Scholar
[2] Pumera M, Sofer Z 2017 Adv. Mater. 29 1605299Google Scholar
[3] 王靖慧, 焦丽颖 2017 科学通报 62 2158Google Scholar
Wang J H, Jiao L Y 2017 Chin. Sci. Bull. 62 2158Google Scholar
[4] 王慧, 徐萌, 郑仁奎 2020 69 017301Google Scholar
Wang H, Xu M, Zheng R K 2020 Acta Phys. Sin. 69 017301Google Scholar
[5] Song X, Hu J, Zeng H 2013 J. Mater. Chem. C 1 2952Google Scholar
[6] Zhao J, Liu H, Yu Z, Quhe R, Zhou S, Wang Y, Liu C C, Zhong H, Han N, Lu J, Yao Y, Wu K 2016 Prog. Mater. Sci. 83 24Google Scholar
[7] 顾品超, 张楷亮, 冯玉林, 王芳, 苗银萍, 韩叶梅, 张韩霞 2016 65 018102Google Scholar
Gu P C, Zhang K L, Feng Y L, Wang F, Miao Y P, Han Y M, Zhang H X 2016 Acta Phys. Sin. 65 018102Google Scholar
[8] 魏争, 王琴琴, 郭玉拓, 李佳蔚, 时东霞, 张广宇 2018 67 128103Google Scholar
Wei Z, Wang Q Q, Guo Y T, Li J W, Shi D X, Zhang G Y 2018 Acta Phys. Sin. 67 128103Google Scholar
[9] Hong Y, Liu Z, Wang L, Zhou T, Ma W, Xu C, Feng S, Chen L, Chen M, Sun D, Sun D, Chen X, Chen H, Ren W 2020 Science 369 670Google Scholar
[10] 黄坤, 殷雅俊, 吴继业 2014 63 156201Google Scholar
Huang K, Yin Y J, Wu J Y 2014 Acta Phys. Sin. 63 156201Google Scholar
[11] 黄坤, 殷雅俊, 屈本宁, 吴继业 2014 力学学报 46 905Google Scholar
Huang K, Yin Y J, Qu B N, Wu J Y 2014 Chin. J. Theoret. Appl. Mechan. 46 905Google Scholar
[12] Cao K, Feng S, Han Y, Gao L, Lu Y 2020 Nat. Commun. 11 284Google Scholar
[13] Li X, Zhu H 2015 J. Materiomics 1 33Google Scholar
[14] Xiong S, Cao G 2016 Nanotechnology 27 105701Google Scholar
[15] Jiang J, Qi Z, Park H, Rabczuk T 2013 Nanotechnology 24 435705Google Scholar
[16] Late D, Shirodkar S, Waghmare U, Dravid V, Rao C 2014 Chemphyschem 15 1592Google Scholar
[17] Hu X, Yasaei P, Jokisaari J, Öğüt S, Salehi-Khojin A, Robert F, Klie R 2018 Phys. Rev. Lett. 120 055902
[18] Zhang R, Cao H, Jiang J 2020 Nanotechnology 31 405709Google Scholar
[19] Akinwande D, Brennan C, Bunch J, Egberts P, Felts J, Gao H, Huang R, Kim J, Li T, Li Y 2017 Extreme Mech. Lett. 23 42
[20] Wei Y, Yang R 2018 Natl. Sci. Rev. 6 324
[21] Chen S, Chrzan D C 2011 Phys. Rev. B 84 5409
[22] Jiang J, Wang B, Wang J 2015 J. Phys-Condens. Mat. 27 083001Google Scholar
[23] Zhou L, Cao G 2016 Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 18 1657Google Scholar
[24] Gao E, Xu Z 2015 J. Appl. Mech. 82 121012Google Scholar
[25] Audoly B, Pomeau Y 2010 Elasticity and Geometry: From Hair Curls to the Non-linear Response of Shells (New York: Oxford University Press) pp157-213
[26] Kudin K, Scuseria G, Yakobson B 2001 Phys. Rev. B 64 235406Google Scholar
[27] Landau L, Lifshitz E 1997 Theory of Elasticity 3rd (Oxford: Butterworth Heinemann) pp38−50
[28] O'NEILL B 2006 Elementary Differential Geometry (Singapore: Elsevier) pp364−376
[29] Eduard E, Krauthammer T 2001 Thin Plates and Shells: Theory, Analysis, and Applications (New York: Marcel Dekker) pp191−240
[30] 胡海昌 1981 弹性力学的变分原理及其应用 (北京: 科学出版社)pp322−342
Hu H 1981 Variational Principles of Theory of Elasticity with Applications (Beijing: Science Press) pp322−342 (in Chinese)
[31] Liu K, Yan Q, Chen M, Fan W, Sun Y, Suh J, Fu D, Lee S, Zhou J, Tongay S, Ji J, Neaton J, Wu J 2014 Nano Lett. 14 5097Google Scholar
[32] Cooper R C, Lee C, Marianetti C A, Wei X, Hone J, Kysar J W 2013 Phys. Rev. B 87 035423Google Scholar
[33] Xiong S, Cao G 2015 Nanotechnology 26 185705Google Scholar
[34] Luongo A, Egidio A 2005 Nonlinear. Dynam. 41 171Google Scholar
[35] Luongo A, D'Annibale F 2013 Int. J. Nonlin. Mech. 55 128Google Scholar
Catalog
Metrics
- Abstract views: 3953
- PDF Downloads: 68
- Cited By: 0