-
Porous graphene (PG), a kind of graphene-related material with nanopores in the graphene plane, exhibits novel properties different from those of pristine graphene, leading to its potential applications in many fields. Owing to periodic nanopores existing naturally in the two-dimensional layer, PG can be used as an ideal candidate for hydrogen storage material. High hydrogen storage capacity of Li-decorated PG has been investigated theoretically, but the effect of temperature on the stability of the H2 adsorbed on Li-PG has been not discussed yet. In this paper, by using the first-principles method, the hydrogen storage capacity on alkaline metal atoms (Li, Na, K) decorated porous graphene is investigated in depth with generalized gradient approximation, and the effect of the temperature on the stability of the hydrogen adsorption system is elucidated by the ab initio molecular-dynamics simulation. The results show that the most favorable adsorption sites of Li, Na and K are the hollow center sites of the C hexagon, and four alkaline metal atoms can be adsorbed stably on both sides of PG unit cell without clustering. Alkaline metal adatoms adsorbed on PG become positively charged by transferring charge to PG and adsorbed H2 molecules, and three H2 molecules can be adsorbed around each alkaline metal atom. By analyzing the Mulliken atomic populations, charge density differences and density of states of H2 adsorbed on Li-PG system, we find that the H2 molecules are adsorbed on alkaline metal atoms decorated graphene complex by attractive interaction between positively charged alkaline metal adatoms and negatively charged H and weak van der Waals interaction. Twelve H2 molecules are adsorbed on both sides of PG decorated with alkaline metal atoms. The average adsorption energy of H2 adsorbed on Li-PG, Na-PG and K-PG are –0.246, –0.129 and –0.056 eV/H2, respectively. It is obvious that the hydrogen adsorption capacity of Li-PG system is strongest, and the hydrogen adsorption capacity of K-PG is weakest, thus K-PG structure is not suitable for hydrogen storage. Furthermore, by the ab initio molecular-dynamic simulation, in which the NVT ensemble is selected but the external pressure is not adopted, the effect of temperature on the stability of H2 molecules adsorbed on Li-PG system is elucidated. The result shows that the configuration of Li-PG is very stable, H2 molecules are stably adsorbed around the Li atoms at low temperature, and some H2 molecules start to be desorbed from the Li atoms with the increase of temperature. At 200 K, H2 molecules begin to move away from Li atoms, and two H2 molecules escape from the binding of the Li atoms at 250 K. At 300 K, nine H2 molecules can be stably absorbed on both sides of Li-PG, and the gravimetric hydrogen storage capacity can reach up to 9.25 wt.%, which is much higher than the the US Department of Energy target value of 5.5 wt.% for the year 2017. With the increase of temperature, more adsorbed H2 molecules are desorbed, seven H2 molecules can be desorbed at 400 K, and all H2 molecules are completely desorbed in a temperature range of 600–700 K.
-
Keywords:
- porous graphene /
- hydrogen storage /
- first-principles /
- molecular-dynamic
[1] Jiang L L, Fan Z J 2014 Nanoscale 6 1922Google Scholar
[2] Liu W, Wang Z F, Shi Q W, Yang J L, Liu F 2009 Phys. Rev. B 80 233405Google Scholar
[3] Bieri M, Treier M, Cai J M, Aït-Mansour K, Ruffieux P, Gröning O, Gröning P, Kastler M, Rieger R, Feng X L, Müllen K, Fasel R 2009 Chem. Commun. 45 6919
[4] Du A J, Zhu Z H, Smith S C 2010 J. Am. Chem. Soc. 132 2876Google Scholar
[5] Li Y F, Zhou Z, Shen P W, Chen Z F 2010 Chem. Commun. 46 3672Google Scholar
[6] Hatanaka M 2010 Chem. Phys. Lett. 488 187Google Scholar
[7] Jiang D E, Cooper V R, Dai S 2009 Nano Lett. 9 4019Google Scholar
[8] Merchant C A, Healy K, Wanunu M, Ray V, Petermn N, Battel J, Fischbein M D, Venta K, Luo Z T, Johnson C, Drndić M 2010 Nano Lett. 10 2915Google Scholar
[9] Mukherjee R, Thomas A V, Datta D, Singh E, Li J W, Eksik O, Shenoy V B, Koratkar N 2014 Nature Commun. 5 3710Google Scholar
[10] Bi H, Xie X, Yin K, Zhou Y, Wan S, He L, Xu F, Banhart F, Sun L, Ruoff R S 2012 Adv. Funct. Mater 22 4421Google Scholar
[11] Reunchan P, Jhi S H 2011 Appl. Phys. Lett. 98 093103Google Scholar
[12] Ao Z M, Dou S X, Xu Z M, Jiang Q G, Wang G X 2014 Int. J. Hydrogen energy 39 16244Google Scholar
[13] Yuan L H, Chen Y H, Kang L, Zhang C R, Wang D B, Wang C N, Zhang M L, Wu X J 2017 Appl. Surf. Sci. 399 463Google Scholar
[14] Yuan L H, Kang L, Chen Y H, Wang D B, Gong J J, Wang C N, Zhang M L, Wu X J 2018 Appl. Surf. Sci. 434 843Google Scholar
[15] Yuan L H, Wang D B, Gong J J, Zhang C R, Zhang L P, Zhang M L, Wu X J, Kang L 2019 Chem. Phys. Lett. 726 57Google Scholar
[16] Lu R F, Rao D W, Lu Z L, Qian J C, Li F, Wu H P, Wang Y Q, Xiao C Y, Deng K M, Kan E J, Deng W Q 2012 J. Phys. Chem. C 116 21291Google Scholar
[17] Huang S H, Miao L 2012 J. Appl. Phys. 112 124312Google Scholar
[18] Wang Y, Ji Y, Li M, Yuan P, Sun Q, Jia Y 2011 J. App. Phys. 110 094311Google Scholar
[19] Chen Y D, Yu S, Zhao W H, Li S F, Duan X M 2018 Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 20 13473Google Scholar
[20] Wang F D, Zhang T, Hou X Y, Zhang W Q, Tang S W, Sun H, Zhang J P 2017 Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 42 10099Google Scholar
[21] Hashmi A, Farooq M U, Khan I, Son J, Hong J 2017 J. Mater. Chem. A 5 2821Google Scholar
[22] Ning G Q, Xu C G, Mu L, Chen G J, Wang G, Gao J S, Fan Z J, Qian W Z, Wei F 2012 Chem. Commun. 48 6815Google Scholar
[23] Xia K S, Tian X L, Fei S X, You K 2014 Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 39 11047Google Scholar
[24] Elyassi M, Rashidi A, Hantehzadeh M R, Elahi S M 2017 Surf. Interface Anal 49 230Google Scholar
[25] Vanderbilt D 1990 Phys. Rev. B 41 7892Google Scholar
[26] Perdew J P, Burke K, Ernzerhof M 1996 Phys. Rev. Lett. 77 3865Google Scholar
[27] Ao Z M, Peeters F M 2010 Phys. Rev. B 81 205406Google Scholar
[28] Rao D W, Lu R F, Meng Z S, Wang Y, Lu Z L, Liu Y Z, Chen X, Kan E, Xiao C Y, Deng K M, Wu H P 2014 Int.J. Hydrogen Energy 39 18966Google Scholar
[29] 基泰尔 C 著 (项金钟, 吴兴惠 译) 2009 固体物理导论 (北京: 化学工业出版社) 第38页
Kittel C (translated by Xiang J Z, Wu X H) 2009 Introduction to Solid State Physics (Beijing: Chemical Industry Press) p38 (in Chinese)
[30] 周晓锋, 方浩宇, 唐春梅 2019 68 053601Google Scholar
Zhou X F, Fang H Y, Tang C M 2019 Acta Phys. Sin. 68 053601Google Scholar
[31] Seentithurai S, Kodi Pandya R, Vinodh Kumar S, Saranya C, mahendran M 2014 Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 39 11016Google Scholar
[32] Sacchi M, Jenkins S J 2014 Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 16 6101Google Scholar
-
表 1 H2吸附能(ΔEad)、平均吸附能(
$\Delta {\bar E_{{\rm{ad}}}}$ )及Li所带的电荷(q)Table 1. Adsorption energies (ΔEad) and average adsorption energies (
$\Delta {\bar E_{{\rm{ad}}}}$ )of H2 molecules, and the charge of Li (q).n(H2) 1 2 3 4 ΔEad /eV –0.308 –0.239 –0.249 –0.044 $\Delta {\bar E_{{\rm{ad}}}}$/eV·H2–1 –0.308 –0.274 –0.266 –0.225 q /e 1.23 1.40 1.56 1.56 表 2 Na-PG吸附H2分子的吸附能
Table 2. Adsorption energies of H2 molecules on Na-PG.
n(H2) 1 2 3 ΔEh1/eV –0.202 –0.262 –0.215 ΔEh2/eV –0.234 –0.117 –0.166 -
[1] Jiang L L, Fan Z J 2014 Nanoscale 6 1922Google Scholar
[2] Liu W, Wang Z F, Shi Q W, Yang J L, Liu F 2009 Phys. Rev. B 80 233405Google Scholar
[3] Bieri M, Treier M, Cai J M, Aït-Mansour K, Ruffieux P, Gröning O, Gröning P, Kastler M, Rieger R, Feng X L, Müllen K, Fasel R 2009 Chem. Commun. 45 6919
[4] Du A J, Zhu Z H, Smith S C 2010 J. Am. Chem. Soc. 132 2876Google Scholar
[5] Li Y F, Zhou Z, Shen P W, Chen Z F 2010 Chem. Commun. 46 3672Google Scholar
[6] Hatanaka M 2010 Chem. Phys. Lett. 488 187Google Scholar
[7] Jiang D E, Cooper V R, Dai S 2009 Nano Lett. 9 4019Google Scholar
[8] Merchant C A, Healy K, Wanunu M, Ray V, Petermn N, Battel J, Fischbein M D, Venta K, Luo Z T, Johnson C, Drndić M 2010 Nano Lett. 10 2915Google Scholar
[9] Mukherjee R, Thomas A V, Datta D, Singh E, Li J W, Eksik O, Shenoy V B, Koratkar N 2014 Nature Commun. 5 3710Google Scholar
[10] Bi H, Xie X, Yin K, Zhou Y, Wan S, He L, Xu F, Banhart F, Sun L, Ruoff R S 2012 Adv. Funct. Mater 22 4421Google Scholar
[11] Reunchan P, Jhi S H 2011 Appl. Phys. Lett. 98 093103Google Scholar
[12] Ao Z M, Dou S X, Xu Z M, Jiang Q G, Wang G X 2014 Int. J. Hydrogen energy 39 16244Google Scholar
[13] Yuan L H, Chen Y H, Kang L, Zhang C R, Wang D B, Wang C N, Zhang M L, Wu X J 2017 Appl. Surf. Sci. 399 463Google Scholar
[14] Yuan L H, Kang L, Chen Y H, Wang D B, Gong J J, Wang C N, Zhang M L, Wu X J 2018 Appl. Surf. Sci. 434 843Google Scholar
[15] Yuan L H, Wang D B, Gong J J, Zhang C R, Zhang L P, Zhang M L, Wu X J, Kang L 2019 Chem. Phys. Lett. 726 57Google Scholar
[16] Lu R F, Rao D W, Lu Z L, Qian J C, Li F, Wu H P, Wang Y Q, Xiao C Y, Deng K M, Kan E J, Deng W Q 2012 J. Phys. Chem. C 116 21291Google Scholar
[17] Huang S H, Miao L 2012 J. Appl. Phys. 112 124312Google Scholar
[18] Wang Y, Ji Y, Li M, Yuan P, Sun Q, Jia Y 2011 J. App. Phys. 110 094311Google Scholar
[19] Chen Y D, Yu S, Zhao W H, Li S F, Duan X M 2018 Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 20 13473Google Scholar
[20] Wang F D, Zhang T, Hou X Y, Zhang W Q, Tang S W, Sun H, Zhang J P 2017 Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 42 10099Google Scholar
[21] Hashmi A, Farooq M U, Khan I, Son J, Hong J 2017 J. Mater. Chem. A 5 2821Google Scholar
[22] Ning G Q, Xu C G, Mu L, Chen G J, Wang G, Gao J S, Fan Z J, Qian W Z, Wei F 2012 Chem. Commun. 48 6815Google Scholar
[23] Xia K S, Tian X L, Fei S X, You K 2014 Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 39 11047Google Scholar
[24] Elyassi M, Rashidi A, Hantehzadeh M R, Elahi S M 2017 Surf. Interface Anal 49 230Google Scholar
[25] Vanderbilt D 1990 Phys. Rev. B 41 7892Google Scholar
[26] Perdew J P, Burke K, Ernzerhof M 1996 Phys. Rev. Lett. 77 3865Google Scholar
[27] Ao Z M, Peeters F M 2010 Phys. Rev. B 81 205406Google Scholar
[28] Rao D W, Lu R F, Meng Z S, Wang Y, Lu Z L, Liu Y Z, Chen X, Kan E, Xiao C Y, Deng K M, Wu H P 2014 Int.J. Hydrogen Energy 39 18966Google Scholar
[29] 基泰尔 C 著 (项金钟, 吴兴惠 译) 2009 固体物理导论 (北京: 化学工业出版社) 第38页
Kittel C (translated by Xiang J Z, Wu X H) 2009 Introduction to Solid State Physics (Beijing: Chemical Industry Press) p38 (in Chinese)
[30] 周晓锋, 方浩宇, 唐春梅 2019 68 053601Google Scholar
Zhou X F, Fang H Y, Tang C M 2019 Acta Phys. Sin. 68 053601Google Scholar
[31] Seentithurai S, Kodi Pandya R, Vinodh Kumar S, Saranya C, mahendran M 2014 Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 39 11016Google Scholar
[32] Sacchi M, Jenkins S J 2014 Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 16 6101Google Scholar
-
068802-20190694-补充材料.pdf
Catalog
Metrics
- Abstract views: 8610
- PDF Downloads: 140
- Cited By: 0