-
The degree of freedom of orbital angular momentum of light has been used as a new information carrier in optical holographic information processing technology. However, current research on orbital angular momentum holography mainly focuses on two-dimensional orbital angular momentum holography, where the reconstructed two-dimensional holographic image is located in a certain plane in three-dimensional space. How to further implement three-dimensional spatial orbital angular momentum holographic technology and use it to increase the information capacity of holographic communication is still a blank. Here, we implement three-dimensional spatial orbital angular momentum holographic technology based on the degrees of freedom of orbital angular momentum and the positional degrees of freedom of reconstructed two-dimensional images in three-dimensional space. In other words, in the three-dimensional spatial orbital angular momentum holography, the acquisition of the target object image requires not only the correct orbital angular momentum state used for decoding, but also the correct spatial position where the object’s image is detected. In addition, we further investigate the three-dimensional spatial orbit angular momentum holographic multiplexing technology and point out that this multiplexing technology can be used for information encryption. Compared with traditional two-dimensional orbital angular momentum holography, three-dimensional spatial orbital angular momentum holography uses an additional degree of freedom. Therefore, the encryption scheme based on three-dimensional spatial orbital angular momentum holographic technology can further improve the security level of information. Our simulation results and experimental results have verified the feasibility of three-dimensional spatial orbit angular momentum holographic technology and three-dimensional spatial orbit angular momentum holographic encryption technology.
-
Keywords:
- orbital angular momentum /
- optical holography /
- optical encryption
[1] Gabor D 1948 Nature 161 777Google Scholar
[2] Blanche P A, Bablumian A, Voorakaranam R, et al. 2010 Nature 468 80Google Scholar
[3] Huang L, Chen X, Mühlenbernd H, et al. 2013 Nat. Commun. 4 2808Google Scholar
[4] Li X, Ren H, Chen X, et al. 2015 Nat. Commun. 6 6984Google Scholar
[5] Wakunami K, Hsieh P Y, Oi R, et al. 2016 Nat. Commun. 7 12954Google Scholar
[6] Pégard N C, Mardinly A R, Oldenburg I A, Sridharan S, Waller L, Adesnik H 2017 Nat. Commun. 8 1228Google Scholar
[7] Yu H, Lee K, Park J, Park Y 2017 Nat. Photon. 11 186Google Scholar
[8] Makey G, Yavuz Ö, Kesim D K, Turnalı A, Elahi P, Ilday S, Tokel O, Ilday F Ö 2019 Nat. Photonics 13 251Google Scholar
[9] Marquet P, Rappaz B, Magistretti P J, Cuche E, Emery Y, Colomb T, Depeursinge C 2005 Opt. Lett. 30 468Google Scholar
[10] Rosen J, Brooker G 2008 Nat. Photonics 2 190Google Scholar
[11] 赵应春, 张秀英, 袁操今, 聂守平, 朱竹青, 王林, 李杨, 贡丽萍, 冯少彤 2014 63 224202Google Scholar
Zhao Y C, Zhang X Y, Yuan C J, Nie S P, Zhu Z Q, Wang L, Li Y, Gong L P, Feng S T 2014 Acta Phys. Sin. 63 224202Google Scholar
[12] Refregier P, Javidi B 1995 Opt. Lett. 20 767Google Scholar
[13] Chen W, Javidi B, Chen X 2014 Adv. Opt. Photonics 6 120Google Scholar
[14] 王仁德, 张亚萍, 朱旭锋, 王帆, 李重光, 张永安, 许蔚 2019 68 114202Google Scholar
Wang R D, Zhang Y P, Zhu X F, Wang F, Li C G, Zhang Y A, Xu W 2019 Acta Phys. Sin. 68 114202Google Scholar
[15] 席思星, 于娜娜, 王晓雷, 朱巧芬, 董昭, 王微, 刘秀红, 王华英 2019 68 110502Google Scholar
Xi S X, Yu N N, Wang X L, Zhu Q F, Dong Z, Wang W, Liu X H, Wang H Y 2019 Acta Phys. Sin. 68 110502Google Scholar
[16] Heanue J F, Bashaw M C, Hesselink L 1994 Science 265 749Google Scholar
[17] Larocque H, Sugic D, Mortimer D, Taylor A J, Fickler R, Boyd R W, Dennis M R, Karimi E 2018 Nat. Phys. 14 1079Google Scholar
[18] Wang S, Wang L, Zhang F, Kong L J 2022 Chin. Phys. Lett. 39 104101Google Scholar
[19] Guo X, Li P, Zhong J, Liu S, Wei B, Zhu W, Qi S, Cheng H, Zhao J 2020 Laser Photonics Rev. 14 1900366Google Scholar
[20] Kong L J, Zhang W, Li P, Guo X, Zhang J, Zhang F, Zhao J, Zhang X 2022 Nat. Commun. 13 2705Google Scholar
[21] Ozaki M, Kato J, Kawata S 2011 Science 332 218Google Scholar
[22] Li X, Chen L, Li Y, Zhang X, Pu M, Zhao Z, Ma X, Wang Y, Hong M, Luo X 2016 Sci. Adv. 2 e1601102Google Scholar
[23] Bao Y, Yu Y, Xu H, Guo C, Li J, Sun S, Zhou Z K, Qiu C W, Wang X H 2019 Light-Sci. Appl. 8 95Google Scholar
[24] Lim K T P, Liu H, Liu Y, Yang J K W 2019 Nat. Commun. 10 25Google Scholar
[25] Shen X A, Nguyen A D, Perry J W, Huestis D L, Kachru R 1997 Science 278 96Google Scholar
[26] Tikan A, Bielawski S, Szwaj C, Randoux S, Suret P 2018 Nat. Photonics 12 228Google Scholar
[27] Balthasar Mueller J P, Rubin N A, Devlin R C, Groever B, Capasso F 2017 Phys. Rev. Lett. 118 113901Google Scholar
[28] Zhao R, Sain B, Wei Q, Tang C, Li X, Weiss T, Huang L, Wang Y, Zentgraf T 2018 Light Sci. Appl. 7 95Google Scholar
[29] Defienne H, Ndagano B, Lyons A, Faccio D 2021 Nat. Phys. 17 591Google Scholar
[30] Wang J, Yang J Y, Fazal I M, et al. 2012 Nat. Photonics 6 488Google Scholar
[31] Huang H, Xie G, Yan Y, et al. 2014 Opt. Lett. 39 197Google Scholar
[32] Krenn M, Handsteiner J, Fink M, Fickler R, Ursin R, Malik M, Zeilinger A 2016 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 113 13648Google Scholar
[33] Lavery M P J, Peuntinger C, Günthner K, et al. 2017 Sci. Adv. 3 e1700552Google Scholar
[34] Bozinovic N, Yue Y, Ren Y, Tur M, Kristensen P, Huang H, Willner A E, Ramachandran S 2013 Science 340 1545Google Scholar
[35] Mair A, Vaziri A, Weihs G, Zeilinger A 2001 Nature 412 313Google Scholar
[36] Kong L J, Li Y, Liu R, et al. 2019 Phys. Rev. A 100 023822Google Scholar
[37] Kong L J, Liu R, Qi W R, Wang Z X, Huang S Y, Wang Q, Tu C, Li Y, Wang H T 2019 Sci. Adv. 5 eaat9206Google Scholar
[38] Kong L J, Sun Y, Zhang F, Zhang J, Zhang X 2023 Phys. Rev. Lett. 130 053602Google Scholar
[39] Zhang Y, Agnew M, Roger T, Roux F S, Konrad T, Faccio D, Leach J, Forbes A 2017 Nat. Commun. 8 632Google Scholar
[40] Dada A C, Leach J, Buller G S, Padgett M J, Andersson E 2011 Nat. Phys. 7 677Google Scholar
[41] Ren H, Briere G, Fang X, Ni P, Sawant R, Héron S, Chenot S, Vézian S, Damilano B, Brändli V, Maier S A, Genevet P 2019 Nat. Commun. 10 2986Google Scholar
[42] Fang X, Ren H, Gu M 2020 Nat. Photonics 14 102Google Scholar
[43] Ren H, Fang X, Jang J, Bürger J, Rho J, Maier S A 2020 Nat. Nanotechnol. 15 948Google Scholar
[44] Zhou H, Sain B, Wang Y, Schlickriede C, Zhao R, Zhang X, Wei Q, Li X, Huang L, Zentgraf T 2020 ACS Nano 14 5553Google Scholar
[45] Fang X, Yang H, Yao W, Wang T, Zhang Y, Gu M, Xiao M 2021 Adv. Photonics 3 015001Google Scholar
[46] Zhu G, Bai Z, Chen J, Huang C, Wu L, Fu C, Wang Y 2021 Opt. Express 29 28452Google Scholar
[47] Wang F, Zhang X, Xiong R, Ma X, Jiang X 2022 Opt. Express 30 11110Google Scholar
[48] Shi Z, Wan Z, Zhan Z, Liu K, Liu Q, Fu X 2023 Nat. Commun. 14 1869Google Scholar
[49] Zhang F, Kong L J, Zhang Z, Zhang J, Zhang X 2023 Opt. Express 31 12922Google Scholar
-
图 1 用于实现三维空间OAM全息的全息图设计方案. 通过将目标图像与二维Dirac梳状采样阵列相乘即可获得能够保留OAM特征的全息图; 然后通过在保留OAM全息图上添加OAM态的螺旋相位分布, 生成具有OAM特征选择性的全息图; 最后, 使用FZP对OAM选择性全息图进行编码, 即可获得用于三维空间OAM全息的全息图. 这里, FZP的“焦距”($ {f_{{\text{FZP}}}} $)控制着重构出的全息图像在三维空间中的位置
Figure 1. Design of the holograms of three-dimensional (3D) spatial OAM holography. The OAM-preserved holograms are obtained by multiplying the target images with the two-dimensional Dirac comb sampling array. Then, the OAM-selective holograms are generated by adding a phase function of OAM modes onto the OAM-preserved hologram. 3D spatial OAM-selective holograms are obtained by encoding the OAM-selective holograms with the Fresnel zone plates (FZP). The positions of the reconstructed holographic images are controlled by the focal lengths of FZP ($ {f_{{\text{FZP}}}} $).
图 2 三维空间OAM全息的理论模拟结果 (a) 理论模拟中选用的6个目标图像; (b) 6个目标图像的三维空间OAM全息图; (c)三维空间OAM全息中, 6个图像重构的理论模拟结果.
Figure 2. Simulation results of the reconstructed images of 3D spatial OAM holography: (a) The six target images; (b) holograms of 3D spatial OAM holography of six target images; (c) simulation results of reconstructed images in 3D spatial OAM holography.
图 3 三维空间OAM全息的实验装置及其重构结果 (a) 实验装置. 波长633 nm、输出功率10 mW线偏振连续激光经过SLM-1调制后携带OAM态; 由透镜L1和L2组成的4f系统将SLM-1成像到SLM-2上; 三维空间 OAM全息的全息图加载于SLM-2上. 携带OAM态的光场经SLM-2衍射后, 在三维空间中重构出的目标物体的全息图像; (b) 与图2(c)中一一对应的三维空间OAM全息图像重构的实验结果
Figure 3. Experiments and results of 3D spatial OAM hologram reconstruction. (a) Experimental setup. The light source is a continuous-wave laser operating at 633 nm with an output power of ~10 mW. The incident light, after modulated by SLM-1, carries the desired OAM state. A 4f system consisted of lenses L1 and L2 images SLM-1 onto the SLM-2. The holographic images of objects will be reconstructed in 3D space after the light field carrying OAM state is diffracted by SLM-2. (b) The experimental results of 3D spatial OAM holographic image reconstruction, which corresponds to the simulation results in Fig. 2 (c).
图 4 三维空间OAM多路复用全息 (a) 三维空间OAM多路复用全息的全息图设计; (b) 三维空间OAM多路复用全息的重构的实验结果. 只有当入射光束具备正确的OAM态, 且在正确的全息图像重构平面内时, 才会出现清晰的图像. 这里, 每一行的三个实验数据已做了归一化处理
Figure 4. 3D spatial OAM holographic multiplexing technology. (a) Design of the holograms for 3D spatial OAM holographic multiplexing technology. (b) The experimental results for the 3D spatial OAM holographic multiplexing technology. Only when the incident beam has the correct OAM state and is in the correct holographic image reconstruction plane, will a clear image appear. Here, the three experimental data in each row have been normalized.
图 5 在三维空间OAM全息中, 全息重构图像的间距对串扰的影响. 第一行表示用于编码的三个FZP的“焦距”$ {f_{{\text{FZP}}}} $= z1, $ {f_{{\text{FZP}}}} $= z2和$ {f_{{\text{FZP}}}} $=z3的大小. 在重构的结果中, 每一个重构图像的左上角的数字为该图像对应的参数$ R = {{{{\bar I}_{{\text{pigeon}}}}} \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {{{{\bar I}_{{\text{pigeon}}}}} {{{\bar I}_{{\text{non - pigeon}}}}}}} \right. } {{{\bar I}_{{\text{non - pigeon}}}}}} $的值. $ {\bar I_{{\text{pigeon}}}} $和$ {\bar I_{{\text{non - pigeon}}}} $分别代表鸽子区域和非鸽子区域的强度分布的平均值
Figure 5. Influence of the distances among the holographic reconstructed images on crosstalk in 3D spatial OAM holography. The first line represents the values of the “focal length” of the three FZPs used for encoding, $ {f_{{\text{FZP}}}} $= z1, $ {f_{{\text{FZP}}}} $= z2, and $ {f_{{\text{FZP}}}} $= z3. In the reconstructed results, the number in the upper left corner of each image represents its value of the parameter $ R = {{{{\bar I}_{{\text{pigeon}}}}} \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {{{{\bar I}_{{\text{pigeon}}}}} {{{\bar I}_{{\text{non - pigeon}}}}}}} \right. } {{{\bar I}_{{\text{non - pigeon}}}}}} $, where among them, $ {\bar I_{{\text{pigeon}}}} $represents the average intensity value in the pigeon areas and $ {\bar I_{{\text{non - pigeon}}}} $ represents the average intensity distribution in non-pigeon areas.
-
[1] Gabor D 1948 Nature 161 777Google Scholar
[2] Blanche P A, Bablumian A, Voorakaranam R, et al. 2010 Nature 468 80Google Scholar
[3] Huang L, Chen X, Mühlenbernd H, et al. 2013 Nat. Commun. 4 2808Google Scholar
[4] Li X, Ren H, Chen X, et al. 2015 Nat. Commun. 6 6984Google Scholar
[5] Wakunami K, Hsieh P Y, Oi R, et al. 2016 Nat. Commun. 7 12954Google Scholar
[6] Pégard N C, Mardinly A R, Oldenburg I A, Sridharan S, Waller L, Adesnik H 2017 Nat. Commun. 8 1228Google Scholar
[7] Yu H, Lee K, Park J, Park Y 2017 Nat. Photon. 11 186Google Scholar
[8] Makey G, Yavuz Ö, Kesim D K, Turnalı A, Elahi P, Ilday S, Tokel O, Ilday F Ö 2019 Nat. Photonics 13 251Google Scholar
[9] Marquet P, Rappaz B, Magistretti P J, Cuche E, Emery Y, Colomb T, Depeursinge C 2005 Opt. Lett. 30 468Google Scholar
[10] Rosen J, Brooker G 2008 Nat. Photonics 2 190Google Scholar
[11] 赵应春, 张秀英, 袁操今, 聂守平, 朱竹青, 王林, 李杨, 贡丽萍, 冯少彤 2014 63 224202Google Scholar
Zhao Y C, Zhang X Y, Yuan C J, Nie S P, Zhu Z Q, Wang L, Li Y, Gong L P, Feng S T 2014 Acta Phys. Sin. 63 224202Google Scholar
[12] Refregier P, Javidi B 1995 Opt. Lett. 20 767Google Scholar
[13] Chen W, Javidi B, Chen X 2014 Adv. Opt. Photonics 6 120Google Scholar
[14] 王仁德, 张亚萍, 朱旭锋, 王帆, 李重光, 张永安, 许蔚 2019 68 114202Google Scholar
Wang R D, Zhang Y P, Zhu X F, Wang F, Li C G, Zhang Y A, Xu W 2019 Acta Phys. Sin. 68 114202Google Scholar
[15] 席思星, 于娜娜, 王晓雷, 朱巧芬, 董昭, 王微, 刘秀红, 王华英 2019 68 110502Google Scholar
Xi S X, Yu N N, Wang X L, Zhu Q F, Dong Z, Wang W, Liu X H, Wang H Y 2019 Acta Phys. Sin. 68 110502Google Scholar
[16] Heanue J F, Bashaw M C, Hesselink L 1994 Science 265 749Google Scholar
[17] Larocque H, Sugic D, Mortimer D, Taylor A J, Fickler R, Boyd R W, Dennis M R, Karimi E 2018 Nat. Phys. 14 1079Google Scholar
[18] Wang S, Wang L, Zhang F, Kong L J 2022 Chin. Phys. Lett. 39 104101Google Scholar
[19] Guo X, Li P, Zhong J, Liu S, Wei B, Zhu W, Qi S, Cheng H, Zhao J 2020 Laser Photonics Rev. 14 1900366Google Scholar
[20] Kong L J, Zhang W, Li P, Guo X, Zhang J, Zhang F, Zhao J, Zhang X 2022 Nat. Commun. 13 2705Google Scholar
[21] Ozaki M, Kato J, Kawata S 2011 Science 332 218Google Scholar
[22] Li X, Chen L, Li Y, Zhang X, Pu M, Zhao Z, Ma X, Wang Y, Hong M, Luo X 2016 Sci. Adv. 2 e1601102Google Scholar
[23] Bao Y, Yu Y, Xu H, Guo C, Li J, Sun S, Zhou Z K, Qiu C W, Wang X H 2019 Light-Sci. Appl. 8 95Google Scholar
[24] Lim K T P, Liu H, Liu Y, Yang J K W 2019 Nat. Commun. 10 25Google Scholar
[25] Shen X A, Nguyen A D, Perry J W, Huestis D L, Kachru R 1997 Science 278 96Google Scholar
[26] Tikan A, Bielawski S, Szwaj C, Randoux S, Suret P 2018 Nat. Photonics 12 228Google Scholar
[27] Balthasar Mueller J P, Rubin N A, Devlin R C, Groever B, Capasso F 2017 Phys. Rev. Lett. 118 113901Google Scholar
[28] Zhao R, Sain B, Wei Q, Tang C, Li X, Weiss T, Huang L, Wang Y, Zentgraf T 2018 Light Sci. Appl. 7 95Google Scholar
[29] Defienne H, Ndagano B, Lyons A, Faccio D 2021 Nat. Phys. 17 591Google Scholar
[30] Wang J, Yang J Y, Fazal I M, et al. 2012 Nat. Photonics 6 488Google Scholar
[31] Huang H, Xie G, Yan Y, et al. 2014 Opt. Lett. 39 197Google Scholar
[32] Krenn M, Handsteiner J, Fink M, Fickler R, Ursin R, Malik M, Zeilinger A 2016 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 113 13648Google Scholar
[33] Lavery M P J, Peuntinger C, Günthner K, et al. 2017 Sci. Adv. 3 e1700552Google Scholar
[34] Bozinovic N, Yue Y, Ren Y, Tur M, Kristensen P, Huang H, Willner A E, Ramachandran S 2013 Science 340 1545Google Scholar
[35] Mair A, Vaziri A, Weihs G, Zeilinger A 2001 Nature 412 313Google Scholar
[36] Kong L J, Li Y, Liu R, et al. 2019 Phys. Rev. A 100 023822Google Scholar
[37] Kong L J, Liu R, Qi W R, Wang Z X, Huang S Y, Wang Q, Tu C, Li Y, Wang H T 2019 Sci. Adv. 5 eaat9206Google Scholar
[38] Kong L J, Sun Y, Zhang F, Zhang J, Zhang X 2023 Phys. Rev. Lett. 130 053602Google Scholar
[39] Zhang Y, Agnew M, Roger T, Roux F S, Konrad T, Faccio D, Leach J, Forbes A 2017 Nat. Commun. 8 632Google Scholar
[40] Dada A C, Leach J, Buller G S, Padgett M J, Andersson E 2011 Nat. Phys. 7 677Google Scholar
[41] Ren H, Briere G, Fang X, Ni P, Sawant R, Héron S, Chenot S, Vézian S, Damilano B, Brändli V, Maier S A, Genevet P 2019 Nat. Commun. 10 2986Google Scholar
[42] Fang X, Ren H, Gu M 2020 Nat. Photonics 14 102Google Scholar
[43] Ren H, Fang X, Jang J, Bürger J, Rho J, Maier S A 2020 Nat. Nanotechnol. 15 948Google Scholar
[44] Zhou H, Sain B, Wang Y, Schlickriede C, Zhao R, Zhang X, Wei Q, Li X, Huang L, Zentgraf T 2020 ACS Nano 14 5553Google Scholar
[45] Fang X, Yang H, Yao W, Wang T, Zhang Y, Gu M, Xiao M 2021 Adv. Photonics 3 015001Google Scholar
[46] Zhu G, Bai Z, Chen J, Huang C, Wu L, Fu C, Wang Y 2021 Opt. Express 29 28452Google Scholar
[47] Wang F, Zhang X, Xiong R, Ma X, Jiang X 2022 Opt. Express 30 11110Google Scholar
[48] Shi Z, Wan Z, Zhan Z, Liu K, Liu Q, Fu X 2023 Nat. Commun. 14 1869Google Scholar
[49] Zhang F, Kong L J, Zhang Z, Zhang J, Zhang X 2023 Opt. Express 31 12922Google Scholar
Catalog
Metrics
- Abstract views: 2834
- PDF Downloads: 275
- Cited By: 0