-
In this paper, experiments on 208 MeV Ge ion irradiation with different source-drain bias voltages are carried out for the double-trench SiC metal–oxide–semiconductor field-effect transistors, and the physical mechanism of the single event effect is analyzed. The experimental results show that the drain leakage current of the device increases more obviously with the increase of the initial bias voltage during irradiation. When the bias voltage is 400 V during irradiation, the device has a single event burned at a fluence of 9×104 ion/cm2, and when the bias voltage is 500 V, the device has a single event burned at a fluence of 3×104 ion/cm2, so when the LET value is 37.3 MeV·cm2/mg, the SEB threshold of DUT does not exceed 400 V, which is lower than 34% of the rated operational voltage. The post gate-characteristics test results show that the leakage current of the device with a bias voltage of 100 V does not change significantly during irradiation. When the bias voltage is 200 V, the gate leakage and the drain leakage of the device both increase, so do they when the bias voltage is 300 V, which is positively related to bias voltage. In order to further analyze the single particle effect mechanism of device, the simulation is conducted by using TCAD tool. The simulation results show that at low bias voltage, the heavy ion incident device generates electron-hole pairs, the electrons are quickly swept out, and the holes accumulate at the gate oxygen corner under the effect of the electric field, which combines the source-drain bias voltage, leading to the formation of leakage current channels in the gate oxygen layer. The simulation results also show that at high bias voltage, the electrons generated by the incident heavy ion move towards the junction of the N– drift layer and the N+ substrate under the effect of the electric field, which further increases the electric field strength and causes significant impact ionization. The local high current density generated by the impact ionization and the load large electric field causes the lattice temperature to exceed the melting point of silicon carbide, causing single event burnout. This work provides a reference and support for studying the radiation effect mechanism and putting silicon carbide power devices into aerospace applications.
-
Keywords:
- SiC double-trench metal-oxide-semiconductor field-effect transistors /
- heavy ion irradiation /
- single event burnout
[1] Dimitrijev S, Jamet P 2003 Microelectron. Reliab. 43 225
Google Scholar
[2] Zeng Z, Zhang X, Miao L J 2019 10th International Conference on Power Electronics and ECCE Asia Busan, Korea, May 27–30, 2019 p2139
[3] Zhang L, Xiao J, Qiu Y Z, Cheng H L 2011 Acta Phys. Sin. 60 551 [张林, 肖剑, 邱彦章, 程鸿亮 2011 60 551
Google Scholar
Zhang L, Xiao J, Qiu Y Z, Cheng H L 2011 Acta Phys. Sin.60 551 Google Scholar
[4] Liu X Y, Li C Z, Luo Y H, Chen H, Gao X X, Bai Y 2020 Acta Electron. Sin. 48 2313 [刘新宇, 李诚瞻, 罗烨辉, 陈宏, 高秀秀, 白云 2020 电子学报 48 2313
Google Scholar
Liu X Y, Li C Z, Luo Y H, Chen H, Gao X X, Bai Y 2020 Acta Electron. Sin.48 2313 Google Scholar
[5] Wang J, Zhao T F, Li J, Huang A Q, Callanan R, Husna F, Agarwal A 2008 IEEE Trans. Electron. Dev. 55 1798
Google Scholar
[6] Liu J W, Lu J, Tian X L, Chen H, Bai Y, Liu X Y 2020 Electron. Lett. 56 1273
Google Scholar
[7] Kuboyama S, Kamezawa C, Satoh Y, Hirao T, Ohyama H 2007 IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 54 2379
Google Scholar
[8] Martinella C, Natzke P, Alia R G, Kadi Y, Niskanen K, Rossi M, Jaatinen J, Kettunen H, Tsibizov A, Grossner U, Javanainen A 2022 Microelectron. Reliab. 128 114423
Google Scholar
[9] Martinella C, Ziemann T, Stark R, Tsibizov A, Voss K O, Alia R G, Kadi Y, Grossner U, Javanainen A 2020 IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 67 1381
Google Scholar
[10] Witulski A F, Ball D R, Galloway K F, Javanainen A, Lauenstein J-M, Sternberg A L, Schrimpf R D 2018 IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 65 1951
Google Scholar
[11] Ball D R, Hutson J M, Javanainen A, Lauenstein J M, Galloway K F, Johnson R A, Alles M L, Sternberg A L, Sierawski B D, Witulski A F, Reed R A, Schrimpf R D 2020 IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 67 22
Google Scholar
[12] Ball D R, Galloway K F, Johnson R A, Alles M L, Sternberg A L, Witulski A F, Reed R A, Schrimpf R D, Hutson J M, Lauenstein J M 2021 IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 68 1430
Google Scholar
[13] Liu C C, Guo G, Li Z M, Zhang F Q, Chen Q M, Han J H, Yang X Y 2022 Nucl. Tech. 45 3 [刘翠翠, 郭刚, 李治明, 张付强, 陈启明, 韩金华, 杨新宇 2022 核技术 45 3
Google Scholar
Liu C C, Guo G, Li Z M, Zhang F Q, Chen Q M, Han J H, Yang X Y 2022 Nucl. Tech.45 3 Google Scholar
[14] Pappis D, Zacharias P 2017 19th European Conference on Power Electronics and Applications Warsaw, Poland, September 11–14, 2017 p1
[15] Sato I, Tanaka T, Hori M, Yamada R, Toba A, Kubota H 2021 Electr. Eng. Jpn. 214 e23323
Google Scholar
[16] Sampath M, Morisette D T, Cooper J A 2018 Mater. Sci. Forum 924 752
Google Scholar
[17] 顾朝桥, 郭红霞, 潘霄宇, 雷志峰, 张凤祁, 张鸿, 琚安安, 柳奕天 2011 70 166101
Google Scholar
Gu C Q, Guo H X, Pan X Y, Lei Z F, Zhang F Q, Zhang H, Ju A A, Liu Y T 2021 2011 Acta Phys. Sin. 70 166101
Google Scholar
[18] Zhou X T, Tang Y, Jia Y P, Hu D Q, Wu Y, Xia T, Gong H, Pang H Y 2019 IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 66 2312
Google Scholar
[19] Wang L H, Jia Y P, Zhou X T, Zhao Y F, Wang L, Li T D, Hu D Q, Wu Y, Deng Z H 2022 Microelectron. Reliab. 137 114770
Google Scholar
[20] Cheng G D, Lu J, Zhai L Q, Bai Y, Tian X L, Zuo X X, Yang C Y, Tang Y D, Chen H, Liu X Y 2022 Microelectronics 52 466 [成国栋, 陆江, 翟露青, 白云, 田晓丽, 左欣欣, 杨成樾, 汤益丹, 陈宏, 刘新宇 2022 微电子学 52 466
Google Scholar
Cheng G D, Lu J, Zhai L Q, Bai Y, Tian X L, Zuo X X, Yang C Y, Tang Y D, Chen H, Liu X Y 2022 Microelectronics52 466 Google Scholar
[21] 唐常钦, 王多为, 龚敏, 马瑶, 杨治美 2021 电子与封装 21 080402
Google Scholar
Tang C Q, Wang D W, Gong M, Ma Y, Yang Z M 2021 Electron. Packag. 21 080402
Google Scholar
[22] 王敬轩, 吴昊, 王永维, 李永平, 王勇, 杨霏 2016 智能电网 4 1078
Google Scholar
Wang J X, Wu H, Wang Y W, Li Y P, Wang Y, Yang F 2016 Smart Grid 4 1078
Google Scholar
[23] Zhou X T, Pang H Y, Jia Y P, Hu D Q, Wu Y, Tang Y, Xia T, Gong H, Zhao Y F 2020 IEEE Trans. Electron. Dev. 67 582
Google Scholar
[24] Zhou X T, Pang H Y, Jia Y P, Hu D Q, Wu Y , Zhang S D, Li Y, Li X Y, Wang L H, Fang X Y, Zhao Y F 2021 IEEE Trans. Electron. Dev. 68 4010
Google Scholar
[25] Cheng Y Z 2021 M. S. Thesis (Hangzhou: Hangzhou Dianzi University) [程有忠 2021 硕士 (杭州电子科技大学)
Cheng Y Z 2021 M. S. Thesis (Hangzhou: Hangzhou Dianzi University) [26] Wang Y, Lin M, Li X J, Wu X, Yang J Q, Bao M T, Yu C H, Cao F 2019 IEEE Trans. Electron. Dev. 66 4264
Google Scholar
-
图 1 (a) SiC DTMOSFET单胞结构图; (b) 重离子实验电路原理图
Figure 1. (a) SiC MOSFET cell structure; (b) schematic diagram of heavy ion experiment.
图 2 辐照过程 (a) 漏极电流监测; (b) 烧毁电流监测; (c) 脉冲电流
Figure 2. During irradiation: (a) Leakage current monitoring; (b) burn-out current monitoring; (c) pulse current monitoring.
图 3 辐照前后SiC MOSFET转移特征曲线和输出特征曲线
Figure 3. Transfer characteristic curve and output characteristic curve of SiC MOSFET before and after irradiation.
图 4 辐照后 (a)栅极泄漏电流特性; (b)漏极泄漏电流特性
Figure 4. After irradiation: (a) Gate leakage currents characteristics; (b) drain leakage currents characteristics.
图 5 离子入射位置示意图
Figure 5. Diagram of ion strike positions.
图 6 VDSirr = 200 V时, 不同位置入射器件最大栅氧化层电场强度随时间的演化过程
Figure 6. Evolution of maximum oxide electricfield at different strike positions with simulation time at VDSirr = 200 V.
图 7 VDSirr = 200 V时, 重离子入射器件栅氧化层中电场强度分布图
Figure 7. The distribution of electric field in gate oxide under heavy ion strike at VDSirr = 200 V.
图 8 重离子入射 (a) 1 ps, (b) 10 ps, (c) 100 ps和(d) 1 ns后器件内部晶格温度分布图
Figure 8. The distribution of lattice temperature in device after heavy ion incident of (a) 1 ps, (b) 10 ps, (c) 100 ps, and (d) 1 ns.
图 9 沿离子入射路径电场强度和碰撞电离率的分布情况
Figure 9. Evolutions of impact ionization and electronic indensity along the ion track.
表 1 辐照前后SiC MOSFET阈值电压偏移量和电流变化量
Table 1. Threshold voltage offset and current change of SiC MOSFET before and after irradiation.
辐照过程中初始偏置条件 ΔVth/V ΔId/mA 100 V –0.06 77.51 200 V –0.09 78.73 300 V –0.16 80.56 
DownLoad: CSV
-
[1] Dimitrijev S, Jamet P 2003 Microelectron. Reliab. 43 225
Google Scholar
[2] Zeng Z, Zhang X, Miao L J 2019 10th International Conference on Power Electronics and ECCE Asia Busan, Korea, May 27–30, 2019 p2139
[3] Zhang L, Xiao J, Qiu Y Z, Cheng H L 2011 Acta Phys. Sin. 60 551 [张林, 肖剑, 邱彦章, 程鸿亮 2011 60 551
Google Scholar
Zhang L, Xiao J, Qiu Y Z, Cheng H L 2011 Acta Phys. Sin.60 551 Google Scholar
[4] Liu X Y, Li C Z, Luo Y H, Chen H, Gao X X, Bai Y 2020 Acta Electron. Sin. 48 2313 [刘新宇, 李诚瞻, 罗烨辉, 陈宏, 高秀秀, 白云 2020 电子学报 48 2313
Google Scholar
Liu X Y, Li C Z, Luo Y H, Chen H, Gao X X, Bai Y 2020 Acta Electron. Sin.48 2313 Google Scholar
[5] Wang J, Zhao T F, Li J, Huang A Q, Callanan R, Husna F, Agarwal A 2008 IEEE Trans. Electron. Dev. 55 1798
Google Scholar
[6] Liu J W, Lu J, Tian X L, Chen H, Bai Y, Liu X Y 2020 Electron. Lett. 56 1273
Google Scholar
[7] Kuboyama S, Kamezawa C, Satoh Y, Hirao T, Ohyama H 2007 IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 54 2379
Google Scholar
[8] Martinella C, Natzke P, Alia R G, Kadi Y, Niskanen K, Rossi M, Jaatinen J, Kettunen H, Tsibizov A, Grossner U, Javanainen A 2022 Microelectron. Reliab. 128 114423
Google Scholar
[9] Martinella C, Ziemann T, Stark R, Tsibizov A, Voss K O, Alia R G, Kadi Y, Grossner U, Javanainen A 2020 IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 67 1381
Google Scholar
[10] Witulski A F, Ball D R, Galloway K F, Javanainen A, Lauenstein J-M, Sternberg A L, Schrimpf R D 2018 IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 65 1951
Google Scholar
[11] Ball D R, Hutson J M, Javanainen A, Lauenstein J M, Galloway K F, Johnson R A, Alles M L, Sternberg A L, Sierawski B D, Witulski A F, Reed R A, Schrimpf R D 2020 IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 67 22
Google Scholar
[12] Ball D R, Galloway K F, Johnson R A, Alles M L, Sternberg A L, Witulski A F, Reed R A, Schrimpf R D, Hutson J M, Lauenstein J M 2021 IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 68 1430
Google Scholar
[13] Liu C C, Guo G, Li Z M, Zhang F Q, Chen Q M, Han J H, Yang X Y 2022 Nucl. Tech. 45 3 [刘翠翠, 郭刚, 李治明, 张付强, 陈启明, 韩金华, 杨新宇 2022 核技术 45 3
Google Scholar
Liu C C, Guo G, Li Z M, Zhang F Q, Chen Q M, Han J H, Yang X Y 2022 Nucl. Tech.45 3 Google Scholar
[14] Pappis D, Zacharias P 2017 19th European Conference on Power Electronics and Applications Warsaw, Poland, September 11–14, 2017 p1
[15] Sato I, Tanaka T, Hori M, Yamada R, Toba A, Kubota H 2021 Electr. Eng. Jpn. 214 e23323
Google Scholar
[16] Sampath M, Morisette D T, Cooper J A 2018 Mater. Sci. Forum 924 752
Google Scholar
[17] 顾朝桥, 郭红霞, 潘霄宇, 雷志峰, 张凤祁, 张鸿, 琚安安, 柳奕天 2011 70 166101
Google Scholar
Gu C Q, Guo H X, Pan X Y, Lei Z F, Zhang F Q, Zhang H, Ju A A, Liu Y T 2021 2011 Acta Phys. Sin. 70 166101
Google Scholar
[18] Zhou X T, Tang Y, Jia Y P, Hu D Q, Wu Y, Xia T, Gong H, Pang H Y 2019 IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 66 2312
Google Scholar
[19] Wang L H, Jia Y P, Zhou X T, Zhao Y F, Wang L, Li T D, Hu D Q, Wu Y, Deng Z H 2022 Microelectron. Reliab. 137 114770
Google Scholar
[20] Cheng G D, Lu J, Zhai L Q, Bai Y, Tian X L, Zuo X X, Yang C Y, Tang Y D, Chen H, Liu X Y 2022 Microelectronics 52 466 [成国栋, 陆江, 翟露青, 白云, 田晓丽, 左欣欣, 杨成樾, 汤益丹, 陈宏, 刘新宇 2022 微电子学 52 466
Google Scholar
Cheng G D, Lu J, Zhai L Q, Bai Y, Tian X L, Zuo X X, Yang C Y, Tang Y D, Chen H, Liu X Y 2022 Microelectronics52 466 Google Scholar
[21] 唐常钦, 王多为, 龚敏, 马瑶, 杨治美 2021 电子与封装 21 080402
Google Scholar
Tang C Q, Wang D W, Gong M, Ma Y, Yang Z M 2021 Electron. Packag. 21 080402
Google Scholar
[22] 王敬轩, 吴昊, 王永维, 李永平, 王勇, 杨霏 2016 智能电网 4 1078
Google Scholar
Wang J X, Wu H, Wang Y W, Li Y P, Wang Y, Yang F 2016 Smart Grid 4 1078
Google Scholar
[23] Zhou X T, Pang H Y, Jia Y P, Hu D Q, Wu Y, Tang Y, Xia T, Gong H, Zhao Y F 2020 IEEE Trans. Electron. Dev. 67 582
Google Scholar
[24] Zhou X T, Pang H Y, Jia Y P, Hu D Q, Wu Y , Zhang S D, Li Y, Li X Y, Wang L H, Fang X Y, Zhao Y F 2021 IEEE Trans. Electron. Dev. 68 4010
Google Scholar
[25] Cheng Y Z 2021 M. S. Thesis (Hangzhou: Hangzhou Dianzi University) [程有忠 2021 硕士 (杭州电子科技大学)
Cheng Y Z 2021 M. S. Thesis (Hangzhou: Hangzhou Dianzi University) [26] Wang Y, Lin M, Li X J, Wu X, Yang J Q, Bao M T, Yu C H, Cao F 2019 IEEE Trans. Electron. Dev. 66 4264
Google Scholar
DownLoad:
Catalog
Metrics
- Abstract views: 2138
- PDF Downloads: 91
- Cited By: 0
