Research progress of applications of acoustic-vortex information

Guo Zhong-Yi; Liu Hong-Jun; Li Jing-Jing; Zhou Hong-Ping; Guo Kai; Gao Jun

doi:10.7498/aps.69.20200826

Abstract

The orbital angular momentum (OAM) carried by acoustic vortex beam can be transmitted to objects, which has a good application prospect in particle manipulation. In addition, the acoustic vortex beam also has great potentials in acoustic communication. The acoustic vortex beams with different OAM modes are orthogonal to each other, so the OAM mode can be introduced into the traditional acoustic communication, which provides a potential solution for realizing the high-speed, large-capacity and high-spectral efficiency of underwater acoustic communication technology in future. In this paper, we summarize the research progress of acoustic vortex beam, in which we mainly introduce the generation and detection scheme of acoustic vortex beam, its transmission characteristics, and its typical research cases in communication. Finally, the future development trend and the outlook of acoustic vortex beam are also analyzed and prospected.

Keywords:

Authors and contacts

School of Computer Science and Information Engineering, Hefei University of Technology, Hefei 230009, China

Corresponding author: Guo Zhong-Yi, guozhongyi@hfut.edu.cn

Funds: Project supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 61775050) and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities of China (Grant No. PA2019GDZC0098)

FullText HTML : translate this paragraph

References

[1]	Nye J F, Berry M V 1974 Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 336 165 Google Scholar
[2]	Berry M V 2004 J. Opt. A 6 259 Google Scholar
[3]	Fu S Y, Zhang S K, Wang T L, Gao C Q 2016 Opt. Express 24 6240 Google Scholar
[4]	Wang J, Yang J Y, Fazal I M, et al. 2012 Nat. Photonics 6 488 Google Scholar
[5]	Kai C H, Huang P, Shen F, Zhou H P 2017 IEEE Photonics J. 9 7902510 Google Scholar
[6]	Guo Z Y, Zhu L, Guo K, Shen F 2017 Nanoscale Res. Lett. 12 1 Google Scholar
[7]	Guo Z Y, Wang Z K, Dedo M M, Guo K 2018 IEEE Photonics J. 10 7906511 Google Scholar
[8]	Dedo M I, Wang Z K, Guo K, Sun Y X, Shen F, Zhou H P, Gao J, Sun R, Ding Z Z, Guo Z Y 2019 Appl. Sci. 9 2269 Google Scholar
[9]	Kai C H, Feng Z K, Dedo M I, Huang P, Guo K, Shen F, Gao J, Guo Z Y 2019 Opt. Commun. 430 151 Google Scholar
[10]	Wang Z K, Guo Z Y 2019 IEEE Access 7 163633 Google Scholar
[11]	Feng Z K, Wang X Y, Dedo M I, Guo K, Shen F, Kai C H, Guo Z Y 2019 Opt. Commun. 435 441 Google Scholar
[12]	Wang Z K, Dedo M M, Guo K, Zhou K Y, Shen F, Sun Y X, Liu S T, Guo Z Y 2019 IEEE Photonics J. 11 7903614 Google Scholar
[13]	Dedo M M, Wang Z K, Guo K, Guo Z Y 2020 Opt. Commun. 456 124696 Google Scholar
[14]	郭忠义, 龚超凡, 刘洪郡, 李晶晶, 王子坤, 杨阳, 宫玉彬 2020 光电工程 47 190593 Google Scholar Guo Z Y, Gong C F, Liu H J, Li J J, Wang Z K, Yang Y, Gong Y B 2020 Opto-Electronic Engineering 47 190593 Google Scholar
[15]	李铁, 谌娟, 柯熙政, 吕宏 2012 61 124208 Google Scholar Li T, Chen J, Ke X Z, Lü H 2012 Acta. Phys. Sin. 61 124208 Google Scholar
[16]	尹霄丽, 郭翊麟, 闫浩, 崔小舟, 常欢, 田清华, 吴国华, 张琦, 刘博, 忻向军 2018 67 114201 Google Scholar Yin X L, Guo Y L, Yan H, Cui X Z, Chang H, Tian Q H, Wu G H, Zhang Q, Liu B, Xin X J 2018 Acta. Phys. Sin. 67 114201 Google Scholar
[17]	崔粲, 王智, 李强, 吴重庆, 王健 2019 68 064211 Google Scholar Cui C, Wang Z, Li Q, Wu C Q, Wang J 2019 Acta. Phys. Sin. 68 064211 Google Scholar
[18]	Yin Z P, Zheng Q, Guo K, Guo Z Y 2019 Appl. Sci. 9 2949 Google Scholar
[19]	Wang L L, Chen H Y, Guo K, Shen F, Guo Z Y 2019 Electronics 8 251 Google Scholar
[20]	Yang Y, Wang Z L, Wang S M, et al. 2019 Electronics 8 1224 Google Scholar
[21]	Yang Y, Guo K, Shen F, Gong Y B, Guo Z Y 2019 IEEE Access 7 138541 Google Scholar
[22]	Shen F, Mu J N, Guo K, Guo Z Y 2019 IEEE T. Antenn. Propag. 67 5763 Google Scholar
[23]	范启蒙, 尹成友 2018 67 144101 Google Scholar Fan Q M, Yin C Y 2018 Acta. Phys. Sin. 67 144101 Google Scholar
[24]	郭忠义, 汪彦哲, 郑群, 尹超逸, 杨阳, 宫玉彬 2019 雷达学报 8 631 Google Scholar Guo Z Y, Wang Y Z, Zheng Q, Yin C Y, Yang Y, Gong Y B 2019 J. Radars 8 631 Google Scholar
[25]	Broadbent E G, Moore D W 1979 Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. 290 353 Google Scholar
[26]	Marston P L 2009 J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 125 3539 Google Scholar
[27]	Kang S T, Yeh C K 2010 IEEE T. Ultrason. Ferr. 57 1451 Google Scholar
[28]	Zhang L, Marston P L 2011 Phys. Rev. E 84 035601 Google Scholar
[29]	Baresch D, Thomas J L, Marchiano R 2013 J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 133 25 Google Scholar
[30]	Marzo A, Caleap M, Drinkwater B W 2018 Phys. Rev. Lett. 120 044301 Google Scholar
[31]	Demore C E M, Yang Z Y, Volovick A, Cochran S, MacDonald M P, Spalding G C 2012 Phys. Rev. Lett. 108 194301 Google Scholar
[32]	Diego B, Thomas J L, Marchiano R 2016 Phys. Rev. Lett. 116 024301 Google Scholar
[33]	Sapozhnikov O A, Bailey M R 2013 J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 133 661
[34]	Volke-Sepulveda K, Santillan A O, Boullosa R R 2008 Phys. Rev. Lett. 100 024302 Google Scholar
[35]	Zhang L K, Marston P L 2011 J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 129 1679 Google Scholar
[36]	Zhang L K, Marston P L 2011 Phys. Rev. E 84 065601 Google Scholar
[37]	Zhang L K 2018 Phys. Rev. Appl. 10 034039 Google Scholar
[38]	Anhauser A, Wunenburger R, Brasselet E 2012 Phys. Rev. Lett. 109 034301 Google Scholar
[39]	Diego B, Thomas J, Marchiano R 2018 Phys. Rev. Lett. 121 074301 Google Scholar
[40]	Bernard I, Doinikov A A, Marmottant P, Rabaud D, Poulain C, Thibault P 2017 Lab Chip 17 2470 Google Scholar
[41]	Maxwell A D, Bailey M, Cunitz B W, et al. 2016 J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 139 2040
[42]	Baresch D, Thomas J L, Marchiano R 2013 J. Appl. Phys. 113 184901 Google Scholar
[43]	Courtney C R P, Demore C E M, et al. 2014 Appl. Phys. Lett. 104 154103 Google Scholar
[44]	Foresti D, Poulikakos D 2014 Phys. Rev. Lett. 112 024301 Google Scholar
[45]	Baudoin M, Gerbedoen J, Riaud A, Matar O B, Smagin N, Thomas J 2019 Sci. Adv. 5 eaav1967 Google Scholar
[46]	Chen X Y, Lam K H, Chen R M, Chen Z Y, Qian X J, Zhang J, Yu P, Zhou Q F 2019 Appl. Phys. Lett. 114 054103 Google Scholar
[47]	Marzo A, Seah S A, Drinkwater B W, Sahoo D R, Long B, Subramanian S 2015 Nat. Commun. 6 8661 Google Scholar
[48]	Seah S A, Drinkwater B W, Carter T, Malkin R, Subramanian S 2014 IEEE T. Ultrason. Ferr. 61 1233 Google Scholar
[49]	Courtney C R P, Drinkwater B W, Demore C E M, et al. 2013 Appl. Phys. Lett. 102 123508 Google Scholar
[50]	Li W, Dai S J, Ma Q Y, Guo G P, Ding H P 2018 Chin. Phys. B 27 024301 Google Scholar
[51]	Hong Z Y, Zhang J, Drinkwater B W 2015 EPL 110 14002 Google Scholar
[52]	李禹志, 王青东, 郭各朴, 马青玉 2018 声学技术 41 704 Li Y Z, Wang Q D, Guo G P, Ma Q Y 2018 Technical Acoustic 41 704
[53]	Skeldon K D, Wilson C, Edgar M, Padgett M J 2008 New J. Phys. 10 013018 Google Scholar
[54]	Zhang R Q, Guo H L, Deng W Y, Huang X Q, Lu J Y, Liu Z Y 2020 Appl. Phys. Lett. 116 123503 Google Scholar
[55]	Hefner B T, Marston P L 1999 J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 106 3313 Google Scholar
[56]	Ma Z Y, Ma J, Zhang D, Tu J 2018 Chin. Phys. B 27 034301 Google Scholar
[57]	Muelas-Hurtado R D, Ealo J L, Pazos-Ospina J F, Volke-Sepulveda K 2018 Appl. Phys. Lett. 112 084101 Google Scholar
[58]	Yang L, Ma Q Y, Tu J, Zhang D 2013 J. Appl. Phys. 113 154904 Google Scholar
[59]	Pazos-Ospina J F, Ealo J L, Franco E E 2017 J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 142 61 Google Scholar
[60]	Li Y Z, Ma Q Y, Guo G P, Tu J, Zhang D 2018 J. Appl. Phys. 124 114901 Google Scholar
[61]	Gspan S, Meyer A, Bernet S, Ritsch-Marte M 2004 J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 115 1142 Google Scholar
[62]	Wunenburger R, Lozano J I V, Brasselet E 2015 New. J. Phys 17 103022 Google Scholar
[63]	Jimenez N, Romero-García V, Picó R, et al. 2014 EPL 106 24005 Google Scholar
[64]	Jiang X, Zhao J J, Liu S L, Liang B, Zou X Y, Yang J, Qiu C W, Cheng J C 2016 Appl. Phys. Lett. 108 203501 Google Scholar
[65]	Jiménez N, Sánchez-Morcillo V, Picó R, García-Raffi L M, Romero-García V, Staliunas K 2015 Phys. Procedia 70 245 Google Scholar
[66]	Wang T, Ke M Z, Li W P, Yang Q, Qiu C Y, Liu Z Y 2016 Appl. Phys. Lett. 109 123506 Google Scholar
[67]	Jimenez N, Romero-García V, García-Raffi L, Camarena F, Staliunas K 2018 Appl. Phys. Lett. 112 204101 Google Scholar
[68]	Muelas-Hurtado R D, Ealo J L, Volke-Sepúlveda K 2020 Appl. Phys. Lett. 116 114101 Google Scholar
[69]	Zhou H P, Li J J, Guo K, Guo Z Y 2019 J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 146 4237 Google Scholar
[70]	Jia Y R, Wei Q, Wu D J, Xu Z, Liu X J 2018 Appl. Phys. Lett. 112 173501 Google Scholar
[71]	Chen D C, Zhou Q X, Zhu X F, Xu Z, Wu D J 2019 Appl. Phys. Lett. 115 083501 Google Scholar
[72]	Jiang X, Li Y, Liang B, Cheng J C, Zhang L K 2016 Phys. Rev. Lett. 117 034301 Google Scholar
[73]	Jia Y R, Ji W Q, Wu D J, Liu X J 2018 Appl. Phys. Lett. 113 173502 Google Scholar
[74]	Guo Z Y, Liu H J, Zhou H, et al. 2019 Phys. Rev. E 100 053315 Google Scholar
[75]	Ye L P, Qiu C Y, Lu J Y, Tang K, Jia H, Ke M Z, Peng S S, Liu Z Y 2016 Aip Adv. 6 085007 Google Scholar
[76]	Esfahlani H, Lissek H, Mosig J R 2017 Phys. Rev. B 95 024312 Google Scholar
[77]	Naify C J, Rohde C A, Martin T P, Nicholas M, Guild M D, Orris G J 2016 Appl. Phys. Lett. 108 223503 Google Scholar
[78]	Charles A R, Christina J N, Matthew D G, et al. 2017 Proc. SPIE 10170 101701I
[79]	Jiménez-Gambín D, Jiménez N, Benlloch J M, Camarena F 2019 Sci. Rep. 9 1 Google Scholar
[80]	Zeng J F, Zhang X, Wu F G, Han L X, Wang Q, Mu Z F, Dong H F, Yao Y W 2019 Phys. Lett. A 383 2640 Google Scholar
[81]	Liu J J, Liang B, Yang J, Yang J, Cheng J C 2020 Sci. Rep. 10 1 Google Scholar
[82]	Fan S W, Wang Y F, Cao L Y, et al. 2020 Appl. Phys. Lett. 116 163504 Google Scholar
[83]	Shi C Z, Dubois M, Wang Y, Zhang X 2017 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 114 7250 Google Scholar
[84]	Jiang X, Liang B, Cheng J C, Qiu C Y 2018 Adv. Mater. 30 1800257 Google Scholar
[85]	Stankevich D A 2019 CEUR Workshop Proceedings 2416 300
[86]	Liu F M, Li W P, Pu Z H, Ke M Z 2019 Appl. Phys. Lett. 114 193501 Google Scholar
[87]	Jiang X, Shi C Z, Wang Y, Smalley J, Cheng J C, Zhang X 2020 Phys. Rev. Appl. 13 014014 Google Scholar
[88]	付时尧, 高春清 2018 67 034201 Google Scholar Fu S Y, Gao C Q 2018 Acta. Phys. Sin. 67 034201 Google Scholar
[89]	Gong C F, Li J J, Guo K, Zhou H P, Guo Z Y 2020 Chin. Phys. B 29 104301 Google Scholar
[90]	Zhou H P, Li J J, Gong C F, Guo K, Guo Z Y 2020 J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 148 167 Google Scholar
[91]	Nye J F, Wright F J 2000 Am. J. Phys. 68 776 Google Scholar
[92]	Thomas J L, Marchiano R 2003 Phys. Rev. Lett. 91 244302 Google Scholar
[93]	Marchiano R, Thomas J L 2005 Phys. Rev. E 71 066616 Google Scholar
[94]	Soldevilla M S, McKenna M F, Wiggins S M, et al. 2005 J. Exp. Biol. 208 2319 Google Scholar
[95]	Gu J J, Yun J 2018 IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 65 1258
[96]	Zhang L K, Swinney H L 2017 J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 141 3186 Google Scholar
[97]	Marchiano R, Coulouvrat F, Ganjehi L, Thomas J L 2008 Phys. Rev. E 77 016605 Google Scholar
[98]	Brunet T, Thomas J, Marchiano R, Coulouvrat F 2009 New J. Phys. 11 013002 Google Scholar
[99]	Fan X D, Zou Z G, Zhang L K 2019 Phys. Rev. Research 1 032014 Google Scholar
[100]	Mullen L, Laux A, Cochenour B 2009 Appl. Opt. 48 2607 Google Scholar
[101]	Mullen L, Alley D, Cochenour B 2011 Appl. Opt. 50 1396 Google Scholar
[102]	梁彬, 程建春 2017 物理 46 658 Google Scholar Liang B, Cheng J C 2017 Physics 46 658 Google Scholar
[103]	Zhang H, Yang J 2019 arXiv: 1902.10196 [eess.SP]
[104]	LI X J, Li Y Z, Ma Q Y, Guo G P, Tu J, Zhang D 2020 J. Appl. Phys. 127 124902 Google Scholar

Cited By

图 1 (a) 利用换能器阵列产生OAM声束示意图^[56]; (b) 利用螺旋型有源衍射声栅产生OAM声束示意图^[57]; (c) 利用声学SPP产生m = 4的OAM声束示意图(c1)和3D打印实物图(c2)^[62]; (d) 用于产生OAM声束的(d1)轴对称声栅^[63]、(d2)对数螺旋声栅^[64]、(d3)阿基米德螺旋声栅^[66]、(d4)菲涅耳半波片声栅^[67,68]、(d5)费马螺旋声栅^[69]; (e) 共振型环形超表面产生OAM声束示意图^[72]; (f) 复合迷宫型环形超表面产生OAM声束示意图^[73]

Figure 1. (a) Schematics of generating acoustic OAM beams using transducers array^[56]; (b) schematics of generating acoustic OAM beams by spiral active diffraction grating^[57]; (c) schematics of a SPP with topological charge m = 4 (c1), picture of the 3D printed thermoplastic acoustic SPP (c2)^[62]; (d) using the axisymmetric sound grating^[63] (d1), logarithmic spiral sound grating^[64] (d2), Archimedes spiral sound grating^[66] (d3), Fresnel zone plate sound grating^[67,68] (d4), Fermat spiral sound grating^[69] (d5) to generate acoustic OAM beams; (e) acoustic OAM beams generated by resonant ring metasurface^[72]; (f) acoustic OAM beams generated by the complex labyrinth type ring metasurface^[73].

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

图 2 (a)采用声学共振结构实现高阶和复合OAM声束的产生^[74], (a1)结构示意图及不同检测平面上的声压与相位分布, (a2)产生复合OAM声束的相位全息图, (a3)加载到超表面上的离散化相位全息图, (a4)检测产生声场组成的结构示意图; (b)采用费马螺旋实现高阶和复合OAM声束的产生^[69], (b1)结构示意图、声压和相位分布以及模式检测结果, (b2)进行模式分离的原理图及(b3)结果

Figure 2. (a) Generation of high-order and multiplexed acoustic OAM beams by acoustic resonance structure^[74], (a1) structure and the distributions of pressure and phase of different planes, (a2) multiplexed phase hologram of OAM sound beams, (a3) discretization phase hologram, (a4) structure to detect vortex field; (b) generation OAM sound beams by Fermat’s spiral diffraction grating^[69], (b1) structural diagram, sound pressure, phase distribution, and power density spectrum, (b2) schematic diagram for detection, and (b3) results.

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

图 3 (a)利用内积算法检测OAM声束示意^[83]; (b)利用抛物线型解码超表面检测OAM声束示意图(b1)和拓扑荷值m和反射角α的函数关系(b2)^[87]; (c)利用圆孔阵列干涉屏检测OAM声束的(c1)示意图和(c2)远场强度分布图^[89]; (d)利用(d1)环形三角孔径与(d2)环形椭圆孔径实现OAM声束检测示意图(d1), (d2)及远场强度分布(d3), (d4)^[90]

Figure 3. (a) Inner product algorithm is used to detect OAM sound beams^[83]; (b) detection of OAM sound beams by using parabolic decoding metasurface (b1), relationship between the reflection angle, α, and OAM charge, m^[87] (b2); (c) detection principle of multipoints interferometer (c1), far-field intensity distributions (c2)^[89]; (d) sketch map (d1), (d2) and far-field intensity distributions (d3), (d4) for (d1) annular triangle aperture and (d2) annular ellipse aperture^[90].

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

图 4 OAM声束通过(a)一维声透镜和(b)二维声透镜的非线性传播^[97], 其中上图显示XOZ平面的均方根振幅. 下图是基波和二次谐波在虚线表示的不同距离(Z = 0.07, 0.23, 0.32和0.85)的XY平面上的相位

Figure 4. Nonlinear propagation of a single OAM sound beams through (a) a 1D acoustical lens and (b) a 2D acoustical lens^[97]. Top view presents the RMS (root mean square) amplitude in the XOZ plane. Bottom views are representations of the phase for the fundamental frequency and the second harmonic across plane X, Y at different distances: Z = 0.07, 0.23, 0.32, and 0.85 the positions of these planes are indicated by dashed lines on the top view.

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

图 5 (a) 携带拓扑荷m = 1 (左)和m = 3 (右)的非线性OAM声束在不同时刻的瞬时声压(黑色箭头表示其中一个激波的位置)^[98]; (b) (b1)分层介质中OAM声束弯曲的模拟, (b2)深度与声速的关系, (b3)在不同的传播距离x下, 相位在y-z截面上的拉伸和变形, (b4)在分层海洋中(左)的相位(彩色图)和能量通量(黑色箭头和白色流线)(顶部)以及与在非分层海洋中(右)的传播的比较^[99]

Figure 5. (a) Instantaneous sound pressure of a nonlinear OAM beam carrying topological charge m = 1 (left) and m = 3 (right) at different moments^[98]. The black arrows indicate the position of one of the three shocks. (b) (b1) Simulation of OAM sound beams bending in a stratified medium, (b2) the sound speed profile, (b3) stretching and distorting of the phase on y-z cross sections at different propagating distances x, (b4) vortex phases (color plots) and energy flux (black arrows and white streamlines) in the stratified ocean (left) and a comparison with propagation in an unstratified ocean (right)^[99].

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

图 6 (a) (a1)实验原理示意图, (a2)单词“Berkly”对应的ASCII编码方式, (a3)实验测量得到的单词“Berkly”对应的调制信号包含的八种拓扑荷的声压幅度与相位^[83]; (b) (b1)基于OAM声束的调制-解调原理示意图, (b2)不同复合信号在解码端两个区域中的分布情况, (b3)用超表面解码前后的信号幅度(左侧)及相位(右侧)分布图^[84,102]

Figure 6. (a) (a1) Schematic diagram of the experiment, (a2) the ASCII code corresponding to the word “Berkly”, (a3) the amplitude and phase of the eight topological charges contained in the modulation signal corresponding to the word “Berkly” as measured by the experiment^[83]; (b) (b1) schematic diagram of the modulation-demodulation principle based on the OAM sound beams, (b2) distribution of different composite signals in two regions of the decoding terminal, (b3) distribution diagram of signal amplitude (left) and phase (right) before and after the decoding with the hypersurface^[84,102].

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

图 7 (a) 水声通信系统多路复用8 OAM模式的概念示意图; (b) (b1) 通信系统传输的256 × 256像素的灰度图像lena (lena.jpg); (b2) 在20 dB信噪比下, 仅考虑加性高斯白噪声得到的接收图像^[103]

Figure 7. (a) Notion of underwater acoustic communication system multiplexing 8 OAM topological charges; (b) (b1) the gray scale image with 256 × 256 pixels of lena (lena.jpg) to be transmitted through the communication system, (b2) the receiving image obtained at 20 dB SNR where additive white gaussian noise (AWGN) was only concerned^[103].

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

表 1 不同涡旋声束产生方案性能比较

Table 1. Performance comparison of different schemes of generating acoustic vortex beams.

	有源方法		无源方法
	螺旋相控源	螺旋型源	相位板	螺旋声栅	超表面
成本	高	高	低	低	低
速度	正常	正常	正常	正常	正常
可靠性	高	高	高	高	高
复杂性	高	高	低	低	低
OAM模式	复合	复合	单一	复合	复合
工作频段	宽	宽	窄	宽	窄

DownLoad: CSV

表 2 不同涡旋声束解调方案性能比较

Table 2. Performances comparison of different demodulation schemes of acoustic vortex beams.

	内积算法	降低OAM模式的阶数	机器学习	螺旋波导	抛物线型解码超表面	圆孔阵列/环形孔径
成本	高	低	低	低	低	低
速度	正常	正常	正常	正常	正常	正常
可靠性	高	高	高	高	高	高
复杂型	复杂	复杂	简单	简单	简单	简单
OAM模式	复合	复合	复合	仅能分辨符号	复合	单一
工作频段	宽	窄	宽	窄	窄	宽

DownLoad: CSV

map

[1]	Nye J F, Berry M V 1974 Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 336 165 Google Scholar
[2]	Berry M V 2004 J. Opt. A 6 259 Google Scholar
[3]	Fu S Y, Zhang S K, Wang T L, Gao C Q 2016 Opt. Express 24 6240 Google Scholar
[4]	Wang J, Yang J Y, Fazal I M, et al. 2012 Nat. Photonics 6 488 Google Scholar
[5]	Kai C H, Huang P, Shen F, Zhou H P 2017 IEEE Photonics J. 9 7902510 Google Scholar
[6]	Guo Z Y, Zhu L, Guo K, Shen F 2017 Nanoscale Res. Lett. 12 1 Google Scholar
[7]	Guo Z Y, Wang Z K, Dedo M M, Guo K 2018 IEEE Photonics J. 10 7906511 Google Scholar
[8]	Dedo M I, Wang Z K, Guo K, Sun Y X, Shen F, Zhou H P, Gao J, Sun R, Ding Z Z, Guo Z Y 2019 Appl. Sci. 9 2269 Google Scholar
[9]	Kai C H, Feng Z K, Dedo M I, Huang P, Guo K, Shen F, Gao J, Guo Z Y 2019 Opt. Commun. 430 151 Google Scholar
[10]	Wang Z K, Guo Z Y 2019 IEEE Access 7 163633 Google Scholar
[11]	Feng Z K, Wang X Y, Dedo M I, Guo K, Shen F, Kai C H, Guo Z Y 2019 Opt. Commun. 435 441 Google Scholar
[12]	Wang Z K, Dedo M M, Guo K, Zhou K Y, Shen F, Sun Y X, Liu S T, Guo Z Y 2019 IEEE Photonics J. 11 7903614 Google Scholar
[13]	Dedo M M, Wang Z K, Guo K, Guo Z Y 2020 Opt. Commun. 456 124696 Google Scholar
[14]	郭忠义, 龚超凡, 刘洪郡, 李晶晶, 王子坤, 杨阳, 宫玉彬 2020 光电工程 47 190593 Google Scholar Guo Z Y, Gong C F, Liu H J, Li J J, Wang Z K, Yang Y, Gong Y B 2020 Opto-Electronic Engineering 47 190593 Google Scholar
[15]	李铁, 谌娟, 柯熙政, 吕宏 2012 61 124208 Google Scholar Li T, Chen J, Ke X Z, Lü H 2012 Acta. Phys. Sin. 61 124208 Google Scholar
[16]	尹霄丽, 郭翊麟, 闫浩, 崔小舟, 常欢, 田清华, 吴国华, 张琦, 刘博, 忻向军 2018 67 114201 Google Scholar Yin X L, Guo Y L, Yan H, Cui X Z, Chang H, Tian Q H, Wu G H, Zhang Q, Liu B, Xin X J 2018 Acta. Phys. Sin. 67 114201 Google Scholar
[17]	崔粲, 王智, 李强, 吴重庆, 王健 2019 68 064211 Google Scholar Cui C, Wang Z, Li Q, Wu C Q, Wang J 2019 Acta. Phys. Sin. 68 064211 Google Scholar
[18]	Yin Z P, Zheng Q, Guo K, Guo Z Y 2019 Appl. Sci. 9 2949 Google Scholar
[19]	Wang L L, Chen H Y, Guo K, Shen F, Guo Z Y 2019 Electronics 8 251 Google Scholar
[20]	Yang Y, Wang Z L, Wang S M, et al. 2019 Electronics 8 1224 Google Scholar
[21]	Yang Y, Guo K, Shen F, Gong Y B, Guo Z Y 2019 IEEE Access 7 138541 Google Scholar
[22]	Shen F, Mu J N, Guo K, Guo Z Y 2019 IEEE T. Antenn. Propag. 67 5763 Google Scholar
[23]	范启蒙, 尹成友 2018 67 144101 Google Scholar Fan Q M, Yin C Y 2018 Acta. Phys. Sin. 67 144101 Google Scholar
[24]	郭忠义, 汪彦哲, 郑群, 尹超逸, 杨阳, 宫玉彬 2019 雷达学报 8 631 Google Scholar Guo Z Y, Wang Y Z, Zheng Q, Yin C Y, Yang Y, Gong Y B 2019 J. Radars 8 631 Google Scholar
[25]	Broadbent E G, Moore D W 1979 Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. 290 353 Google Scholar
[26]	Marston P L 2009 J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 125 3539 Google Scholar
[27]	Kang S T, Yeh C K 2010 IEEE T. Ultrason. Ferr. 57 1451 Google Scholar
[28]	Zhang L, Marston P L 2011 Phys. Rev. E 84 035601 Google Scholar
[29]	Baresch D, Thomas J L, Marchiano R 2013 J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 133 25 Google Scholar
[30]	Marzo A, Caleap M, Drinkwater B W 2018 Phys. Rev. Lett. 120 044301 Google Scholar
[31]	Demore C E M, Yang Z Y, Volovick A, Cochran S, MacDonald M P, Spalding G C 2012 Phys. Rev. Lett. 108 194301 Google Scholar
[32]	Diego B, Thomas J L, Marchiano R 2016 Phys. Rev. Lett. 116 024301 Google Scholar
[33]	Sapozhnikov O A, Bailey M R 2013 J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 133 661
[34]	Volke-Sepulveda K, Santillan A O, Boullosa R R 2008 Phys. Rev. Lett. 100 024302 Google Scholar
[35]	Zhang L K, Marston P L 2011 J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 129 1679 Google Scholar
[36]	Zhang L K, Marston P L 2011 Phys. Rev. E 84 065601 Google Scholar
[37]	Zhang L K 2018 Phys. Rev. Appl. 10 034039 Google Scholar
[38]	Anhauser A, Wunenburger R, Brasselet E 2012 Phys. Rev. Lett. 109 034301 Google Scholar
[39]	Diego B, Thomas J, Marchiano R 2018 Phys. Rev. Lett. 121 074301 Google Scholar
[40]	Bernard I, Doinikov A A, Marmottant P, Rabaud D, Poulain C, Thibault P 2017 Lab Chip 17 2470 Google Scholar
[41]	Maxwell A D, Bailey M, Cunitz B W, et al. 2016 J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 139 2040
[42]	Baresch D, Thomas J L, Marchiano R 2013 J. Appl. Phys. 113 184901 Google Scholar
[43]	Courtney C R P, Demore C E M, et al. 2014 Appl. Phys. Lett. 104 154103 Google Scholar
[44]	Foresti D, Poulikakos D 2014 Phys. Rev. Lett. 112 024301 Google Scholar
[45]	Baudoin M, Gerbedoen J, Riaud A, Matar O B, Smagin N, Thomas J 2019 Sci. Adv. 5 eaav1967 Google Scholar
[46]	Chen X Y, Lam K H, Chen R M, Chen Z Y, Qian X J, Zhang J, Yu P, Zhou Q F 2019 Appl. Phys. Lett. 114 054103 Google Scholar
[47]	Marzo A, Seah S A, Drinkwater B W, Sahoo D R, Long B, Subramanian S 2015 Nat. Commun. 6 8661 Google Scholar
[48]	Seah S A, Drinkwater B W, Carter T, Malkin R, Subramanian S 2014 IEEE T. Ultrason. Ferr. 61 1233 Google Scholar
[49]	Courtney C R P, Drinkwater B W, Demore C E M, et al. 2013 Appl. Phys. Lett. 102 123508 Google Scholar
[50]	Li W, Dai S J, Ma Q Y, Guo G P, Ding H P 2018 Chin. Phys. B 27 024301 Google Scholar
[51]	Hong Z Y, Zhang J, Drinkwater B W 2015 EPL 110 14002 Google Scholar
[52]	李禹志, 王青东, 郭各朴, 马青玉 2018 声学技术 41 704 Li Y Z, Wang Q D, Guo G P, Ma Q Y 2018 Technical Acoustic 41 704
[53]	Skeldon K D, Wilson C, Edgar M, Padgett M J 2008 New J. Phys. 10 013018 Google Scholar
[54]	Zhang R Q, Guo H L, Deng W Y, Huang X Q, Lu J Y, Liu Z Y 2020 Appl. Phys. Lett. 116 123503 Google Scholar
[55]	Hefner B T, Marston P L 1999 J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 106 3313 Google Scholar
[56]	Ma Z Y, Ma J, Zhang D, Tu J 2018 Chin. Phys. B 27 034301 Google Scholar
[57]	Muelas-Hurtado R D, Ealo J L, Pazos-Ospina J F, Volke-Sepulveda K 2018 Appl. Phys. Lett. 112 084101 Google Scholar
[58]	Yang L, Ma Q Y, Tu J, Zhang D 2013 J. Appl. Phys. 113 154904 Google Scholar
[59]	Pazos-Ospina J F, Ealo J L, Franco E E 2017 J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 142 61 Google Scholar
[60]	Li Y Z, Ma Q Y, Guo G P, Tu J, Zhang D 2018 J. Appl. Phys. 124 114901 Google Scholar
[61]	Gspan S, Meyer A, Bernet S, Ritsch-Marte M 2004 J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 115 1142 Google Scholar
[62]	Wunenburger R, Lozano J I V, Brasselet E 2015 New. J. Phys 17 103022 Google Scholar
[63]	Jimenez N, Romero-García V, Picó R, et al. 2014 EPL 106 24005 Google Scholar
[64]	Jiang X, Zhao J J, Liu S L, Liang B, Zou X Y, Yang J, Qiu C W, Cheng J C 2016 Appl. Phys. Lett. 108 203501 Google Scholar
[65]	Jiménez N, Sánchez-Morcillo V, Picó R, García-Raffi L M, Romero-García V, Staliunas K 2015 Phys. Procedia 70 245 Google Scholar
[66]	Wang T, Ke M Z, Li W P, Yang Q, Qiu C Y, Liu Z Y 2016 Appl. Phys. Lett. 109 123506 Google Scholar
[67]	Jimenez N, Romero-García V, García-Raffi L, Camarena F, Staliunas K 2018 Appl. Phys. Lett. 112 204101 Google Scholar
[68]	Muelas-Hurtado R D, Ealo J L, Volke-Sepúlveda K 2020 Appl. Phys. Lett. 116 114101 Google Scholar
[69]	Zhou H P, Li J J, Guo K, Guo Z Y 2019 J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 146 4237 Google Scholar
[70]	Jia Y R, Wei Q, Wu D J, Xu Z, Liu X J 2018 Appl. Phys. Lett. 112 173501 Google Scholar
[71]	Chen D C, Zhou Q X, Zhu X F, Xu Z, Wu D J 2019 Appl. Phys. Lett. 115 083501 Google Scholar
[72]	Jiang X, Li Y, Liang B, Cheng J C, Zhang L K 2016 Phys. Rev. Lett. 117 034301 Google Scholar
[73]	Jia Y R, Ji W Q, Wu D J, Liu X J 2018 Appl. Phys. Lett. 113 173502 Google Scholar
[74]	Guo Z Y, Liu H J, Zhou H, et al. 2019 Phys. Rev. E 100 053315 Google Scholar
[75]	Ye L P, Qiu C Y, Lu J Y, Tang K, Jia H, Ke M Z, Peng S S, Liu Z Y 2016 Aip Adv. 6 085007 Google Scholar
[76]	Esfahlani H, Lissek H, Mosig J R 2017 Phys. Rev. B 95 024312 Google Scholar
[77]	Naify C J, Rohde C A, Martin T P, Nicholas M, Guild M D, Orris G J 2016 Appl. Phys. Lett. 108 223503 Google Scholar
[78]	Charles A R, Christina J N, Matthew D G, et al. 2017 Proc. SPIE 10170 101701I
[79]	Jiménez-Gambín D, Jiménez N, Benlloch J M, Camarena F 2019 Sci. Rep. 9 1 Google Scholar
[80]	Zeng J F, Zhang X, Wu F G, Han L X, Wang Q, Mu Z F, Dong H F, Yao Y W 2019 Phys. Lett. A 383 2640 Google Scholar
[81]	Liu J J, Liang B, Yang J, Yang J, Cheng J C 2020 Sci. Rep. 10 1 Google Scholar
[82]	Fan S W, Wang Y F, Cao L Y, et al. 2020 Appl. Phys. Lett. 116 163504 Google Scholar
[83]	Shi C Z, Dubois M, Wang Y, Zhang X 2017 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 114 7250 Google Scholar
[84]	Jiang X, Liang B, Cheng J C, Qiu C Y 2018 Adv. Mater. 30 1800257 Google Scholar
[85]	Stankevich D A 2019 CEUR Workshop Proceedings 2416 300
[86]	Liu F M, Li W P, Pu Z H, Ke M Z 2019 Appl. Phys. Lett. 114 193501 Google Scholar
[87]	Jiang X, Shi C Z, Wang Y, Smalley J, Cheng J C, Zhang X 2020 Phys. Rev. Appl. 13 014014 Google Scholar
[88]	付时尧, 高春清 2018 67 034201 Google Scholar Fu S Y, Gao C Q 2018 Acta. Phys. Sin. 67 034201 Google Scholar
[89]	Gong C F, Li J J, Guo K, Zhou H P, Guo Z Y 2020 Chin. Phys. B 29 104301 Google Scholar
[90]	Zhou H P, Li J J, Gong C F, Guo K, Guo Z Y 2020 J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 148 167 Google Scholar
[91]	Nye J F, Wright F J 2000 Am. J. Phys. 68 776 Google Scholar
[92]	Thomas J L, Marchiano R 2003 Phys. Rev. Lett. 91 244302 Google Scholar
[93]	Marchiano R, Thomas J L 2005 Phys. Rev. E 71 066616 Google Scholar
[94]	Soldevilla M S, McKenna M F, Wiggins S M, et al. 2005 J. Exp. Biol. 208 2319 Google Scholar
[95]	Gu J J, Yun J 2018 IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 65 1258
[96]	Zhang L K, Swinney H L 2017 J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 141 3186 Google Scholar
[97]	Marchiano R, Coulouvrat F, Ganjehi L, Thomas J L 2008 Phys. Rev. E 77 016605 Google Scholar
[98]	Brunet T, Thomas J, Marchiano R, Coulouvrat F 2009 New J. Phys. 11 013002 Google Scholar
[99]	Fan X D, Zou Z G, Zhang L K 2019 Phys. Rev. Research 1 032014 Google Scholar
[100]	Mullen L, Laux A, Cochenour B 2009 Appl. Opt. 48 2607 Google Scholar
[101]	Mullen L, Alley D, Cochenour B 2011 Appl. Opt. 50 1396 Google Scholar
[102]	梁彬, 程建春 2017 物理 46 658 Google Scholar Liang B, Cheng J C 2017 Physics 46 658 Google Scholar
[103]	Zhang H, Yang J 2019 arXiv: 1902.10196 [eess.SP]
[104]	LI X J, Li Y Z, Ma Q Y, Guo G P, Tu J, Zhang D 2020 J. Appl. Phys. 127 124902 Google Scholar

[1]	Chen Bo, Liu Jin, Li Jun-Tao, Wang Xue-Hua. Research progress of integrated quantum light sources with orbital angular momentum. Acta Physica Sinica, 2024, 73(16): 164204. doi: 10.7498/aps.73.20240791
[2]	Zhang Zhuo, Zhang Jing-Feng, Kong Ling-Jun. Orbital angular momentum splitter of light based on beam displacer. Acta Physica Sinica, 2024, 73(7): 074201. doi: 10.7498/aps.73.20231874
[3]	Zhao Li-Juan, Jiang Huan-Qiu, Xu Zhi-Niu. Helically twisted double-cladding-three-core photonic crystal fiber for generation of orbital angular momentum. Acta Physica Sinica, 2023, 72(13): 134201. doi: 10.7498/aps.72.20222405
[4]	Xu Meng-Min, Li Xiao-Qing, Tang Rong, Ji Xiao-Ling. Influence of wind-dominated thermal blooming on orbital angular momentum and phase singularity of dual-mode vortex beams. Acta Physica Sinica, 2023, 72(16): 164202. doi: 10.7498/aps.72.20230684
[5]	Liu Rui-Xi, Ma Lei. Effects of ocean turbulence on photon orbital angular momentum quantum communication. Acta Physica Sinica, 2022, 71(1): 010304. doi: 10.7498/aps.71.20211146
[6]	Gao Xi, Tang Li-Guang. Wideband and high efficiency orbital angular momentum generator based on bi-layer metasurface. Acta Physica Sinica, 2021, 70(3): 038101. doi: 10.7498/aps.70.20200975
[7]	Jiang Ji-Heng, Yu Shi-Xing, Kou Na, Ding Zhao, Zhang Zheng-Ping. Beam steering of orbital angular momentum vortex wave based on planar phased array. Acta Physica Sinica, 2021, 70(23): 238401. doi: 10.7498/aps.70.20211119
[8]	Cui Can, Wang Zhi, Li Qiang, Wu Chong-Qing, Wang Jian. Modulation of orbital angular momentum in long periodchirally-coupled-cores fiber. Acta Physica Sinica, 2019, 68(6): 064211. doi: 10.7498/aps.68.20182036
[9]	Fu Shi-Yao, Gao Chun-Qing. Progress of detecting orbital angular momentum states of optical vortices through diffraction gratings. Acta Physica Sinica, 2018, 67(3): 034201. doi: 10.7498/aps.67.20171899
[10]	Fan Rong-Hua, Guo Bang-Hong, Guo Jian-Jun, Zhang Cheng-Xian, Zhang Wen-Jie, Du Ge. Entangled W state of multi degree of freedom system based on orbital angular momentum. Acta Physica Sinica, 2015, 64(14): 140301. doi: 10.7498/aps.64.140301
[11]	Fu Dong-Zhi, Jia Jun-Liang, Zhou Ying-Nan, Chen Dong-Xu, Gao Hong, Li Fu-Li, Zhang Pei. Realisation of orbital angular momentum sorter of photons based on sagnac interferometer. Acta Physica Sinica, 2015, 64(13): 130704. doi: 10.7498/aps.64.130704
[12]	Ke Xi-Zheng, Chen Juan, Yang Yi-Ming. Study on orbital angular momentum of Laguerre-Gaussian beam in a slant-path atmospheric turbulence. Acta Physica Sinica, 2014, 63(15): 150301. doi: 10.7498/aps.63.150301
[13]	Qi Xiao-Qing, Gao Chun-Qing, Xin Jing-Tao, Zhang Ge. Experimental study of 8-bits information transmission system based on orbital angular momentum of light beams. Acta Physica Sinica, 2012, 61(17): 174204. doi: 10.7498/aps.61.174204
[14]	Li Tie, Chen Juan, Ke Xi-Zheng. Study of orbital angular momentum entangled photons entanglement in atmospheric channel. Acta Physica Sinica, 2012, 61(12): 124208. doi: 10.7498/aps.61.124208
[15]	Ke Xi-Zheng, Nu Ning, Yang Qin-Ling. Research of transmission characteristics of single-photon orbital angular momentum. Acta Physica Sinica, 2010, 59(9): 6159-6163. doi: 10.7498/aps.59.6159
[16]	Chen Xiao-Yi, Li Hai-Xia, Song Hong-Sheng, Teng Shu-Yun, Cheng Chuan-Fu, Liu Man. Measurement of orbital angular momentum of Laguerre-Gaussian beam by using phase vortices of interference fields. Acta Physica Sinica, 2010, 59(12): 8490-8498. doi: 10.7498/aps.59.8490
[17]	Lü Hong, Ke Xi-Zheng. Scattering of a beam with orbital angular momentum by a single sphere. Acta Physica Sinica, 2009, 58(12): 8302-8308. doi: 10.7498/aps.58.8302
[18]	Su Zhi-Kun, Wang Fa-Qiang, Lu Yi-Qun, Jin Rui-Bo, Liang Rui-Sheng, Liu Song-Hao. Study on quantum cryptography using orbital angular momentum states of photons. Acta Physica Sinica, 2008, 57(5): 3016-3021. doi: 10.7498/aps.57.3016
[19]	Gao Ming-Wei, Gao Chun-Qing, Lin Zhi-Feng. Generation of twisted stigmatic beam and transfer of orbital angular momentum during the beam transformation. Acta Physica Sinica, 2007, 56(4): 2184-2190. doi: 10.7498/aps.56.2184
[20]	Gao Ming-Wei, Gao Chun-Qing, He Xiao-Yan, Li Jia-Ze, Wei Guang-Hui. Rotation of particles by using the beamwith orbital angular momentum. Acta Physica Sinica, 2004, 53(2): 413-417. doi: 10.7498/aps.53.413

Catalog

Vol. 69, Issue 24 - 2020-12-20

Metrics

Abstract views: 9962
PDF Downloads: 550
Cited By: 0

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

Search

Article

留言板