-
High beam-anode layer ion source can produce high-density ions, and has been widely used in plasma cleaning and assisted deposition. However, when increasing the ion-beams, arcing always occurs inside the ion source and serious etching will take place on the cathode, which results in sample pollution especially in long-time cleaning. In this work, two structures are designed, which are magnetic shielding around the anode and sputtering shielding on the top of the inner cathode and outer cathode, respectively. Based on the particle-in-cell/Monte Carlo collision method and test particle Monte Carlo method, the influence of designed structure on the electromagnetic field and the plasma properties of the ion source are studied through self-established simulation technique. The results show that the magnetic shielding around the anode cuts off the magnetic induction line between the cathode and anode, eliminating the arcing condition in the ion source. The sputtering shielding for the cathode uses alumina ceramic because of its extremely low sputtering yield and high insulation performance. Therefore, the sputtering shields can not only resist the ion sputtering, but also shield the electric field on the outer surface of the cathode. As a result, the plasma discharge region is compressed towards the anode and away from the cathode simultaneously, which provides a stronger electric field force directing to the output region for Ar+ ions, and also results in a suppressed cathode etching behavior but an improved Ar+ ion output efficiency. The optimized calculation shows that the best distance from the sputtering shield to the cathode surface is 9 mm. The discharge experiments reveal that the modified ion source can eliminate the inside arcing and provide a clean and strong ion beam with a high efficiency. At the same discharge current, the output efficiency of the modified ion source is 36% higher than that of the original ion source. When used in the plasma cleaning, the glass substrate remains transparent and keeps the original element composition ratio unchanged. The detected Fe content, coming from the cathode sputtering, is only 0.03% after the one-hour plasma cleaning, which is 2 orders of magnitude smaller than that cleaned by the original ion source. The Fe content of the modified ion source is about 0.6% of the original ion source, which is in good agreement with the result of simulation optimization.
-
Keywords:
- large beam-anode layer ion source /
- cathode etching /
- electromagnetic shielding /
- output properties
[1] Harper J M E, Cuomo J J, Kaufman H R 1982 J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 21 737
Google Scholar
[2] 赵杰, 唐德礼, 程昌明, 耿少飞 2009 核聚变与等离子体物理 29 5
Google Scholar
Zhao J, Tang D L, Cheng C M, Geng S F 2009 Nucl. Fusion. Plasma. Phys. 29 5
Google Scholar
[3] Lackner J M, Waldhauser W, Schwarz M, Mahoney L, Major B, 2008 Vacuum. 83 302
Google Scholar
[4] Lee S, Kim D G 2015 Appl. Sci. Converg. Tec. 24 162
Google Scholar
[5] Dudnikov V 2012 Rev. Sci. Instrum. 83 02A713
Google Scholar
[6] Chen L, Cui S H, Tang W, Zhou L, Li T J, Liu L L, An X K, Wu Z C, Ma Z Y, Lin H, Tian X B, Ricky K Y Fu, Paul K Chu, Wu Z Z 2020 Plasma Sources Sci. Technol. 29 025016
Google Scholar
[7] 郭杏元, 曹永盛, 马金鹏 2021 中国专利 CN112575306A
Guo X Y, Cao Y S, Ma J P 2021 China Patent CN112575306A
[8] 汪礼胜, 唐德礼, 程昌明 2006 核聚变与等离子体物理 26 54
Google Scholar
Wang L S, Tang D L, Cheng C M 2006 Nucl. Fusion. Plasma. Phys. 26 54
Google Scholar
[9] 郑军, 周晖, 赵栋才 2019 中国专利 CN108914091B
Zheng J, Zhou H, Zhao D C 2019 China Patent CN108914091B
[10] 王鸣, 陈刚 2020 中国专利 CN109536906A
Wang M, Chen G 2020 China Patent CN109536906A
[11] Brenning N, Gudmundsson J T, Raadu M A, Petty T J, Minea T, Lundin D 2017 Plasma Sources Sci. Technol. 26 125003
Google Scholar
[12] Jiang Y W, Tang H B, Ren J X, Li M, Cao J B 2018 J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 51 035201
Google Scholar
[13] Yu D R, Zhang F K, Liu H, Li H, Yan G J, Liu J Y 2008 Phys. Plasmas 15 104501
Google Scholar
[14] Birdsall C K 1991 IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci. 19 65
Google Scholar
[15] 李体军, 崔岁寒, 刘亮亮, 李晓渊, 吴忠灿, 马正永, 傅劲裕, 田修波, 朱剑豪, 吴忠振 2021 70 045202
Google Scholar
Li T J, Cui S H, Liu L L, Li X Y, Wu Z C, Ma Z Y, Fu R K Y, Tian X B, Chu P K, Wu Z Z 2021 Acta Phys. Sin. 70 045202
Google Scholar
[16] Lennon M A, Bell K L, Gilbody H B, Hughes J G, Kingston A E, Murray M J, Smith F J 1988 J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data 17 1285
Google Scholar
[17] Cui S H, Chen Q H, Guo Y X, Chen L, Jin Z, Li X T, Yang C, Wu Z C, Su X Y, Ma Z Y, Fu R K Y, Tian X B, Chu P K Chu, Wu Z Z 2022 J. Phys. D. Appl. Phys. 55 325203
Google Scholar
[18] Bultinck E, Kolev I, Bogaerts A, Depla D 2008 J. Appl. Phys. 103 013309
Google Scholar
[19] Cui S H, Wu Z Z, Lin H, Xiao S, Zheng B C, Liu L L, An X K, Fu R K Y, Tian X B, Tan W C, Chu P K 2019 J. Appl. Phys. 125 063302
Google Scholar
[20] Bogaerts A, Bultinck E, Kolev I, Schwaederle L, Van A K, Buyle G, Depla D 2009 J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 42 194018
Google Scholar
[21] 崔岁寒, 郭宇翔, 陈秋皓, 金正, 杨超, 吴忠灿, 苏雄宇, 马正永, 田修波, 吴忠振 2022 71 055203
Google Scholar
Cui S H, Guo Y X, Chen Q H, Jin Z, Yang C, Wu Z C, Su X Y, Ma Z Y, Tian X B, Wu Z Z 2022 Acta Phys. Sin. 71 055203
Google Scholar
[22] Samuelsson M, Lundin D, Jensen J, Raadu M A, Gudmundsson J T, Helmersson U 2010 Surf. Coat. Tech. 205 591
Google Scholar
[23] 崔岁寒, 吴忠振, 肖舒, 陈磊, 李体军, 刘亮亮, 傅劲裕, 田修波, 朱剑豪, 谭文长 2019 68 195204
Google Scholar
Cui S H, Wu Z Z, Xiao S, Chen S, Li T J, Liu L L, Fu R K Y, Tian X B, Chu P K, Tan W C 2019 Acta Phys. Sin. 68 195204
Google Scholar
[24] Park D H, Kim J H, Ermakov Y 2008 Rev. Sci. Instrum. 79 02B312
Google Scholar
[25] Gui B H, Yang L, Zhou H, Luo S L, Xu J, Ma Z J, Zhang Y S 2022 Vacuum 200 111065
Google Scholar
[26] Ziegler J F, Ziegler M D, Biersack J P 2010 Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. B 268 1818
Google Scholar
-
图 1 阳极层离子源阳极环绕磁屏蔽罩和内外阴极溅射屏蔽板的设置示意图
Figure 1. Diagram of the anode layer ion source with the magnetic shields surrounding the anode and sputtering shields on the top of the inner and outer cathodes.
图 2 无(a)和有(b)阳极环绕磁屏蔽罩的阳极层离子源的电磁场分布
Figure 2. Electromagnetic field distribution of anode-layer ion source (a) without and (b) with magnetic shields surrounding the anode.
图 3 无(a)和有(b)内外阴极溅射屏蔽板的阳极层离子源的电势与等离子体密度分布
Figure 3. Distribution of potential and plasma density of anode-layer ion source (a) without and (b) with the sputtering shields on the top of the inner and outer cathodes.
图 4 不同溅射屏蔽板与内外阴极间距的阳极层离子源的电势与等离子体密度分布 (a) d = 7 mm; (b) d = 9 mm; (c) d = 11 mm; (d) d = 13 mm
Figure 4. Distribution of potential and plasma density of anode-layer ion source with different distance between the sputtering shield and the cathode: (a) d = 7 mm; (b) d = 9 mm; (c) d = 11 mm; (d) d = 13 mm.
图 5 参与阴极溅射、溅射屏蔽板阻挡与输出Ar+离子比例(a)和能量(b)
Figure 5. (a) Ratio and (b) energy of the Ar+ ions participate in the cathode sputtering, blocking by the sputtering shield and output.
图 6 (a) Ar+离子对阴极材料(Fe)和屏蔽板材料(Al2O3)的溅射产额; (b) 相同条件下阴极和溅射屏蔽板刻蚀产生的Fe, Al和O原子含量(归一化)
Figure 6. (a) Sputtering yield of Ar+ ion to the cathode material (Fe) and shield material (Al2O3); (b) the normalized atomic content of Fe, Al, and O generated by the cathode and sputtering shields under the same conditions
图 7 归一化的Ar+离子输出效率和Fe原子沉积总量
Figure 7. Normalized Ar+ ion output efficiency and Fe atom deposition quantity.
图 8 改进阳极层离子源的(a)结构图、(b)实物图和(c)辉光图; 改进前后离子源在恒压放电条件的(d)放电电流和(e)基片电流密度; 改进前后离子源在恒流放电条件下的(f)基片电流密度
Figure 8. (a) Structural diagram, (b) the physical picture and (c) the glow picture of the modified anode-layer ion source; (d) the discharge current and (e) the substrate current density of the original and the modified ion source under the constant discharge voltage; (f) the substrate current density of the original and the modified ion source under the constant discharge current.
图 9 空白玻璃基片和经改进前后离子源清洗1 h的玻璃基片的(a)实物图和(b)透过率; (c)原离子源与(d) 改进离子源清洗的玻璃基片表面Fe元素分布的EDS检测结果
Figure 9. (a) physical pictures and (b) transmission of blank glass substrates and glass substrates after cleaning by the original and modified ion sources for 1 h; EDS detection results of Fe element distribution on glass substrate surface after cleaning by (c) the original ion source and the (d) modified ion source.
序
号反应方程式 反应速率系数 kr/(m3⋅s–1) 反应能量
阈值/eV反应类型 1 e + Ar → Ar + e $ 2.336 \times {10^{ - 14}}{T_{\text{e}}}^{1.609} \exp [ {0.0618{{( {\ln {T_{\text{e}}}} )}^2} - 0.1171{{ ( {\ln {T_{\text{e}}}} )}^3}} ] $ — 弹性碰撞 2 e + Ar → Ar+ + 2e $ 2.34 \times {10^{ - 14}}{T_{\text{e}}}^{0.59} \exp \left( { - 17.44/{T_{\text{e}}}} \right) $ 15.76 电离碰撞 3 e + Ar → Arm + e $ 2.5 \times {10^{ - 15}}{T_{\text{e}}}^{0.74} \exp \left( { - 11.56/{T_{\text{e}}}} \right) $ 11.56 激发碰撞 4 e + Arm → Ar+ + 2e $ 6.8 \times {10^{ - 15}}{T_{\text{e}}}^{0.67} \exp \left( { - 4.2/{T_{\text{e}}}} \right) $ 4.2 激发态电离 5 e + Arm → Ar + e $ 4.3 \times {10^{ - 16}}{T_{\text{e}}}^{0.74} $ –11.56 退激发碰撞 6 Ar+ + Ar → Ar+ + Ar 硬球碰撞 — 弹性碰撞 7 Ar+ + Ar → Ar + Ar+ 硬球碰撞 — 电荷交换 
DownLoad: CSV
表 2 等离子体放电特征分析
Table 2. Analysis of plasma discharge properties.
d/mm 峰值密度/m–3 峰值位置
坐标/mm放电面
积/mm2无溅射屏蔽板 1.68×1016 (31.5, 52.5) 170.25 7 6.79×1014 (31.0, 50.5) 10.25 9 2.89×1015 (32.0, 51.0) 66.00 11 8.27×1015 (32.0, 52.0) 115.00 13 1.42×1016 (31.5, 52.5) 153.75
DownLoad: CSV
表 3 检验Fe原子MC模型仿真结果
Table 3. Simulation results of the Test Fe atom MC model.
d/mm 输出的Fe
原子比例/%溅射屏蔽板阻挡
Fe原子比例/%返回阴极的Fe
原子比例/%无溅射
屏蔽板19.4 — 80.6 7 0.3 21.1 78.6 9 0.3 24.5 75.2 11 0.3 25.8 73.9 13 0.8 27.3 71.9
DownLoad: CSV
表 4 EDS检测结果
Table 4. EDS detection results.
原子百
分比/%空白玻璃
基片原离子源清洗的
玻璃基片改进离子源清洗的
玻璃基片C 12.61 12.83 10.93 O 55.27 57.33 56.73 Na 7.23 4.57 7.23 Mg 1.91 1.41 1.97 Si 20.51 16.69 20.90 Ca 2.46 2.10 2.22 Fe 0 5.08 0.03
DownLoad: CSV
-
[1] Harper J M E, Cuomo J J, Kaufman H R 1982 J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 21 737
Google Scholar
[2] 赵杰, 唐德礼, 程昌明, 耿少飞 2009 核聚变与等离子体物理 29 5
Google Scholar
Zhao J, Tang D L, Cheng C M, Geng S F 2009 Nucl. Fusion. Plasma. Phys. 29 5
Google Scholar
[3] Lackner J M, Waldhauser W, Schwarz M, Mahoney L, Major B, 2008 Vacuum. 83 302
Google Scholar
[4] Lee S, Kim D G 2015 Appl. Sci. Converg. Tec. 24 162
Google Scholar
[5] Dudnikov V 2012 Rev. Sci. Instrum. 83 02A713
Google Scholar
[6] Chen L, Cui S H, Tang W, Zhou L, Li T J, Liu L L, An X K, Wu Z C, Ma Z Y, Lin H, Tian X B, Ricky K Y Fu, Paul K Chu, Wu Z Z 2020 Plasma Sources Sci. Technol. 29 025016
Google Scholar
[7] 郭杏元, 曹永盛, 马金鹏 2021 中国专利 CN112575306A
Guo X Y, Cao Y S, Ma J P 2021 China Patent CN112575306A
[8] 汪礼胜, 唐德礼, 程昌明 2006 核聚变与等离子体物理 26 54
Google Scholar
Wang L S, Tang D L, Cheng C M 2006 Nucl. Fusion. Plasma. Phys. 26 54
Google Scholar
[9] 郑军, 周晖, 赵栋才 2019 中国专利 CN108914091B
Zheng J, Zhou H, Zhao D C 2019 China Patent CN108914091B
[10] 王鸣, 陈刚 2020 中国专利 CN109536906A
Wang M, Chen G 2020 China Patent CN109536906A
[11] Brenning N, Gudmundsson J T, Raadu M A, Petty T J, Minea T, Lundin D 2017 Plasma Sources Sci. Technol. 26 125003
Google Scholar
[12] Jiang Y W, Tang H B, Ren J X, Li M, Cao J B 2018 J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 51 035201
Google Scholar
[13] Yu D R, Zhang F K, Liu H, Li H, Yan G J, Liu J Y 2008 Phys. Plasmas 15 104501
Google Scholar
[14] Birdsall C K 1991 IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci. 19 65
Google Scholar
[15] 李体军, 崔岁寒, 刘亮亮, 李晓渊, 吴忠灿, 马正永, 傅劲裕, 田修波, 朱剑豪, 吴忠振 2021 70 045202
Google Scholar
Li T J, Cui S H, Liu L L, Li X Y, Wu Z C, Ma Z Y, Fu R K Y, Tian X B, Chu P K, Wu Z Z 2021 Acta Phys. Sin. 70 045202
Google Scholar
[16] Lennon M A, Bell K L, Gilbody H B, Hughes J G, Kingston A E, Murray M J, Smith F J 1988 J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data 17 1285
Google Scholar
[17] Cui S H, Chen Q H, Guo Y X, Chen L, Jin Z, Li X T, Yang C, Wu Z C, Su X Y, Ma Z Y, Fu R K Y, Tian X B, Chu P K Chu, Wu Z Z 2022 J. Phys. D. Appl. Phys. 55 325203
Google Scholar
[18] Bultinck E, Kolev I, Bogaerts A, Depla D 2008 J. Appl. Phys. 103 013309
Google Scholar
[19] Cui S H, Wu Z Z, Lin H, Xiao S, Zheng B C, Liu L L, An X K, Fu R K Y, Tian X B, Tan W C, Chu P K 2019 J. Appl. Phys. 125 063302
Google Scholar
[20] Bogaerts A, Bultinck E, Kolev I, Schwaederle L, Van A K, Buyle G, Depla D 2009 J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 42 194018
Google Scholar
[21] 崔岁寒, 郭宇翔, 陈秋皓, 金正, 杨超, 吴忠灿, 苏雄宇, 马正永, 田修波, 吴忠振 2022 71 055203
Google Scholar
Cui S H, Guo Y X, Chen Q H, Jin Z, Yang C, Wu Z C, Su X Y, Ma Z Y, Tian X B, Wu Z Z 2022 Acta Phys. Sin. 71 055203
Google Scholar
[22] Samuelsson M, Lundin D, Jensen J, Raadu M A, Gudmundsson J T, Helmersson U 2010 Surf. Coat. Tech. 205 591
Google Scholar
[23] 崔岁寒, 吴忠振, 肖舒, 陈磊, 李体军, 刘亮亮, 傅劲裕, 田修波, 朱剑豪, 谭文长 2019 68 195204
Google Scholar
Cui S H, Wu Z Z, Xiao S, Chen S, Li T J, Liu L L, Fu R K Y, Tian X B, Chu P K, Tan W C 2019 Acta Phys. Sin. 68 195204
Google Scholar
[24] Park D H, Kim J H, Ermakov Y 2008 Rev. Sci. Instrum. 79 02B312
Google Scholar
[25] Gui B H, Yang L, Zhou H, Luo S L, Xu J, Ma Z J, Zhang Y S 2022 Vacuum 200 111065
Google Scholar
[26] Ziegler J F, Ziegler M D, Biersack J P 2010 Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. B 268 1818
Google Scholar
DownLoad:
Catalog
Metrics
- Abstract views: 1031
- PDF Downloads: 43
- Cited By: 0
