-
The preparation of traditional organic-inorganic lead-halogen hybrid perovskite solar cells often requires strict nitrogen glove box conditions, thus hindering their industrial scalability. This study develops a large-area perovskite film formation process and designs a novel device structure to achieve a dual enhancement of module device efficiency and stability in a high humidity air environment (55%). High-quality perovskite thin films are successfully prepared by vacuum extraction in ambient air, followed by a double-end low-temperature photopolymerization process utilizing acrylate monomer molecules for inner encapsulation modification of the freshly formed perovskite thin films. The influences of these techniques on the photoelectric characteristics of perovskite thin films and devices are investigated. The results indicate that uniform and dense perovskite films can be achieved in ambient air with a pumping time of 60 s. By adjusting the concentration of ethylene glycol dimethacrylate monomer molecules used in the low-temperature photopolymerization process, the surface defects on the perovskite film can be effectively controlled. The optimal concentration of 1 mg/mL results in perovskite film with optimal morphology and fluorescence intensity. Furthermore, rigid module device and flexible module device (effective area: 18 cm²), based on the polymer inner encapsulation, demonstrate outstanding outdoor photoelectric conversion efficiencies of 19.51% and 18.17%, respectively (with the highest indoor low-light conversion efficiencies of 34.5% and 30.2%, respectively). Notably, the untreated flexible device exhibits a significant decline in photoelectric conversion efficiency, falling below 50% of the initial value after one month of exposure to air. In contrast, device incorporating the polymer inner encapsulation layer maintains over 90% of their original efficiency, highlighting their excellent humidity resistance stability. Moreover, the polymer encapsulation layer also greatly improves the bending stability of the flexible device. This research paves the way for industrial-scale producing perovskite solar cells and addressing the challenges associated with humidity and large-area fabrication. The findings contribute to advancing perovskite solar cell technology and offering a pathway for high-efficiency and stable devices suitable for practical applications.
-
Keywords:
- perovskite solar cell /
- module /
- low temperature photopolymerization /
- polymer internal encapsulation
[1] Brenner T M, Egger D A, Kronik L, Hodes G, Cahen D 2016 Nat. Rev. Mater. 1 15007Google Scholar
[2] Wolf S D, Holovsky J, Moon S J, Löper P, Niesen B, Ledinsky M, Haug F J, Yum J H, Ballif C 2014 J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 5 1035Google Scholar
[3] Stranks S D, Eperon G E, Grancini G, Menelaou C, Alcocer M J P, Leijtens T, Herz L, Petrozza A, Snaith H J 2013 Science 342 341Google Scholar
[4] Xing G C, Mathews N, Sun S Y, Lim S S, Lam Y M, Grätzel M, Mhaisalkar S, Sum T C 2013 Science 342 344Google Scholar
[5] Leijtens T, Lim J, Teuscher J, Park T, Snaith H 2013 Adv. Mater. 25 3227Google Scholar
[6] https://www.nrel.gov/pv/interactive-cell-efficiency.html
[7] Ding Y, Ding B, Kanda H, Usiobo O J, Gallet T, Yang Z H, Liu Y, Huang H, Sheng J, Liu C, Yang Y, Queloz V I E, Zhang X F, Audinot J N, Redinger A, Dang W, Mosconic E, Luo W, Angelis F D, Wang M K, Dörflinger P, Armer M, Schmid V, Wang R, Brooks K G, Wu J H, Dyakonov V, Yang G J, Dai S Y, Dyson P J, Nazeeruddin M K 2022 Nat. Nanotechnol. 17 598Google Scholar
[8] Rana P J S, Febriansyah B, Koh T M, Muhammad B T, Salim T, Hooper T J N, Kanwat A, Ghosh B, Kajal P, Lew J H, Aw Y C, Yantara N, Bruno A, Pullarkat S A, Ager J W, Leong W L, Mhaisalkar S G, Mathews N 2022 Adv. Funct. Mater. 32 2113026Google Scholar
[9] Wang Y, Yang H, Zhang K, Tao M Q, Li M Z, Song Y L 2022 ACS Energy Lett. 7 3646Google Scholar
[10] Zhang K, Wang Y, Tao M Q, Guo L T, Yang Y R, Shao J Y, Zhang Y Y, Wang F Y, Song Y L 2023 Adv. Mater. 35 2211593Google Scholar
[11] Brooks K G, Nazeeruddin M K 2021 Adv. Energy Mater. 11 2101149Google Scholar
[12] Castriotta L A, Zendehdel M, Nia N Y, Leonardi E, Löfffer M, Paci B, Generosi A, Rellinghaus B, Carlo A D 2022 Adv. Energy Mater. 12 2103420Google Scholar
[13] Babayigit A, Haen J D, Boyen H G, Conings B 2018 Joule 2 1205Google Scholar
[14] Konstantakou M, Perganti D, Falaras P, Stergiopoulos T 2017 Crystals 7 291Google Scholar
[15] Gu L, Wang S, Fang X, Liu D, Xu Y, Yuan N, Ding J 2020 ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 12 33870Google Scholar
[16] Jang G, Kwon H C, Ma S, Yun S C, Yang H, Moon J 2019 Adv. Energy Mater. 9 1901719Google Scholar
[17] Gu L L, Fei F, Xu Y B, Wang S B, Yuan N Y, Ding J N 2022 ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 14 2949Google Scholar
[18] Li H Y, Bu T L, Li J, Lin Z P, Pan J Y, Li Q H, Zhang X L, Ku Z L, Cheng Y B, Huang F Z 2021 ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 13 18724Google Scholar
[19] Vesce L, Stefanelli M, Herterich J P, Castriotta L A, Kohlstädt M, Würfel U, Carlo A D 2021 Solar RRL 5 2100073Google Scholar
[20] Xu J, Dong H, Xi J, Yang Y, Yu Y, Ma L, Chen J B, Jiao B, Hou X, Li J R, Wu Z X 2020 Nano Energy 75 104940Google Scholar
[21] Xu J, Xi J, Dong H, Ahn N, Zhu Z L, Chen J B, Li P Z, Zhu X Y, Dai J F, Hu Z Y, Jiao B, Hou X, Li J R, Wu Z X 2021 Nano Energy 88 106286Google Scholar
[22] Zhu X Y, Dong H, Chen J B, Xu J, Li Z J, Yuan F, Dai J F, Jiao B, Hou X, Xi J, Wu Z X 2022 Adv. Funct. Mater. 32 2202408Google Scholar
-
图 2 空气中真空萃取制备的钙钛矿薄膜的表面SEM和AFM形貌图 (a), (e) 0 mg/mL; (b), (f) 1.0 mg/mL; (c), (g) 2.0 mg/mL; (d), (h) 5.0 mg/mL
Figure 2. SEM and AFM morphologies of perovskite films prepared by vacuuming in air with different weight concentrations: (a), (e) 0 mg/mL; (b), (f) 1.0 mg/mL; (c), (g) 2.0 mg/mL; (d), (h) 5.0 mg/mL.
表 1 聚合物层修饰的刚性和柔性模组器件室外光电参数比较
Table 1. Comparison of optoelectronic parameters of polymer layer modified rigid and flexible perovskite module devices.
器件 JSC/(mA·cm–2) VOC/V FF/% PCE/% Glass/ITO-控制组 (in air) 3.84 6.62 73.6 18.71 Glass/ITO-PEGDMA (in air) 3.94 6.70 73.9 19.51 Glass/ITO-PEGDMA (in N2) 4.02 6.65 73.3 19.59 PEN/ITO-控制组 (in air) 3.81 6.51 65.6 16.26 PEN/ITO-PEGDMA (in air) 3.83 6.60 71.9 18.17 PEN/ITO-PEGDMA (in N2) 3.89 6.63 71.3 18.39 -
[1] Brenner T M, Egger D A, Kronik L, Hodes G, Cahen D 2016 Nat. Rev. Mater. 1 15007Google Scholar
[2] Wolf S D, Holovsky J, Moon S J, Löper P, Niesen B, Ledinsky M, Haug F J, Yum J H, Ballif C 2014 J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 5 1035Google Scholar
[3] Stranks S D, Eperon G E, Grancini G, Menelaou C, Alcocer M J P, Leijtens T, Herz L, Petrozza A, Snaith H J 2013 Science 342 341Google Scholar
[4] Xing G C, Mathews N, Sun S Y, Lim S S, Lam Y M, Grätzel M, Mhaisalkar S, Sum T C 2013 Science 342 344Google Scholar
[5] Leijtens T, Lim J, Teuscher J, Park T, Snaith H 2013 Adv. Mater. 25 3227Google Scholar
[6] https://www.nrel.gov/pv/interactive-cell-efficiency.html
[7] Ding Y, Ding B, Kanda H, Usiobo O J, Gallet T, Yang Z H, Liu Y, Huang H, Sheng J, Liu C, Yang Y, Queloz V I E, Zhang X F, Audinot J N, Redinger A, Dang W, Mosconic E, Luo W, Angelis F D, Wang M K, Dörflinger P, Armer M, Schmid V, Wang R, Brooks K G, Wu J H, Dyakonov V, Yang G J, Dai S Y, Dyson P J, Nazeeruddin M K 2022 Nat. Nanotechnol. 17 598Google Scholar
[8] Rana P J S, Febriansyah B, Koh T M, Muhammad B T, Salim T, Hooper T J N, Kanwat A, Ghosh B, Kajal P, Lew J H, Aw Y C, Yantara N, Bruno A, Pullarkat S A, Ager J W, Leong W L, Mhaisalkar S G, Mathews N 2022 Adv. Funct. Mater. 32 2113026Google Scholar
[9] Wang Y, Yang H, Zhang K, Tao M Q, Li M Z, Song Y L 2022 ACS Energy Lett. 7 3646Google Scholar
[10] Zhang K, Wang Y, Tao M Q, Guo L T, Yang Y R, Shao J Y, Zhang Y Y, Wang F Y, Song Y L 2023 Adv. Mater. 35 2211593Google Scholar
[11] Brooks K G, Nazeeruddin M K 2021 Adv. Energy Mater. 11 2101149Google Scholar
[12] Castriotta L A, Zendehdel M, Nia N Y, Leonardi E, Löfffer M, Paci B, Generosi A, Rellinghaus B, Carlo A D 2022 Adv. Energy Mater. 12 2103420Google Scholar
[13] Babayigit A, Haen J D, Boyen H G, Conings B 2018 Joule 2 1205Google Scholar
[14] Konstantakou M, Perganti D, Falaras P, Stergiopoulos T 2017 Crystals 7 291Google Scholar
[15] Gu L, Wang S, Fang X, Liu D, Xu Y, Yuan N, Ding J 2020 ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 12 33870Google Scholar
[16] Jang G, Kwon H C, Ma S, Yun S C, Yang H, Moon J 2019 Adv. Energy Mater. 9 1901719Google Scholar
[17] Gu L L, Fei F, Xu Y B, Wang S B, Yuan N Y, Ding J N 2022 ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 14 2949Google Scholar
[18] Li H Y, Bu T L, Li J, Lin Z P, Pan J Y, Li Q H, Zhang X L, Ku Z L, Cheng Y B, Huang F Z 2021 ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 13 18724Google Scholar
[19] Vesce L, Stefanelli M, Herterich J P, Castriotta L A, Kohlstädt M, Würfel U, Carlo A D 2021 Solar RRL 5 2100073Google Scholar
[20] Xu J, Dong H, Xi J, Yang Y, Yu Y, Ma L, Chen J B, Jiao B, Hou X, Li J R, Wu Z X 2020 Nano Energy 75 104940Google Scholar
[21] Xu J, Xi J, Dong H, Ahn N, Zhu Z L, Chen J B, Li P Z, Zhu X Y, Dai J F, Hu Z Y, Jiao B, Hou X, Li J R, Wu Z X 2021 Nano Energy 88 106286Google Scholar
[22] Zhu X Y, Dong H, Chen J B, Xu J, Li Z J, Yuan F, Dai J F, Jiao B, Hou X, Xi J, Wu Z X 2022 Adv. Funct. Mater. 32 2202408Google Scholar
Catalog
Metrics
- Abstract views: 2598
- PDF Downloads: 82
- Cited By: 0