Search

Article

x

留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

“Machine micro/nano optics scientist”: Application and development of artificial intelligence in micro/nano optical design

Hou Chen-Yang Meng Fan-Chao Zhao Yi-Ming Ding Jin-Min Zhao Xiao-Ting Liu Hong-Wei Wang Xin Lou Shu-Qin Sheng Xin-Zhi Liang Sheng

Citation:

“Machine micro/nano optics scientist”: Application and development of artificial intelligence in micro/nano optical design

Hou Chen-Yang, Meng Fan-Chao, Zhao Yi-Ming, Ding Jin-Min, Zhao Xiao-Ting, Liu Hong-Wei, Wang Xin, Lou Shu-Qin, Sheng Xin-Zhi, Liang Sheng
PDF
HTML
Get Citation
  • Micro/nano optical materials and devices are the key to many optical fields such as optical communication, optical sensing, biophotonics, laser, and quantum optics, etc. At present, the design of micro/nano optics mainly relies on the numerical methods such as Finite-difference time-domain (FDTD), Finite element method (FEM) and Finite difference method (FDM). These methods bottleneck the current micro/nano optical design because of their dependence on computational resources, low innovation efficiency, and difficulties in obtaining global optimal design. Artificial intelligence (AI) has brought a new paradigm of scientific research: AI for Science, which has been successfully applied to chemistry, materials science, quantum mechanics, and particle physics. In the area of micro/nano design AI has been applied to the design research of chiral materials, power dividers, microstructured optical fibers, photonic crystal fibers, chalcogenide solar cells, plasma waveguides, etc. According to the characteristics of the micro/nano optical design objects, the datasets can be constructed in the form of parameter vectors for complex micro/nano optical designs such as hollow core anti-resonant fibers with multi-layer nested tubes, and in the form of images for simple micro/nano optical designs such as 3dB couplers. The constructed datasets are trained with artificial neural network, deep neural network and convolutional neural net algorithms to fulfill the regression or classification tasks for performance prediction or inverse design of micro/nano optics. The constructed AI models are optimized by adjusting the performance evaluation metrics such as mean square error, mean absolute error, and binary cross entropy. In this paper, the application of AI in micro/nano optics design is reviewed, the application methods of AI in micro/nano optics are summarized, and the difficulties and future development trends of AI in micro/nano optics research are analyzed and prospected.
      Corresponding author: Liang Sheng, shliang@bjtu.edu.cn
    • Funds: Project supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 12174022, 62005020, 62101027).
    [1]

    李涛, 祝世宁 2022 科学观察 17 63Google Scholar

    Li T, Zhu S N 2022 Science Focus 17 63Google Scholar

    [2]

    Zhang Y, He Y, Wu J, Jiang X, Liu R, Qiu C, Jiang X, Yang J, Tremblay C, Su Y 2016 Opt. Express 24 6586Google Scholar

    [3]

    Hu Y, Yu M, Zhu D, et al. 2021 Nature 599 587Google Scholar

    [4]

    Ham B S 2020 Sci. Rep. -UK 10 7309Google Scholar

    [5]

    Xie C, Zou X, Zou F, Yan L, Pan W, Zhang Y 2021 Chin. Phys. B 30 120703Google Scholar

    [6]

    Shibayama J, Kawai H, Yamauchi J, Nakano H 2019 Opt. Commun. 452 360Google Scholar

    [7]

    Chen S, Xie Z, Ye H, Wang X, Guo Z, He Y, Li Y, Yuan X, Fan D 2021 Light-Sci. Appl. 10 222Google Scholar

    [8]

    De M, Gangopadhyay T K, Singh V K 2019 Sensors 19 464Google Scholar

    [9]

    Portosi V, Laneve D, Falconi M C, Prudenzano F 2019 Sensors 19 1892Google Scholar

    [10]

    Yu R, Chen Y, Shui L, Xiao L 2020 Sensors 20 2996Google Scholar

    [11]

    Meinecke S, Drzewietzki L, Weber C, Lingnau B, Breuer S, Lüdge K 2019 Sci. Rep. -UK 9 1783Google Scholar

    [12]

    Fan Y, van Rees A, van der Slot P, Mak J, Oldenbeuving R M, Hoekman M, Geskus D, Roeloffzen C, Boller K J 2020 Opt. Express 28 21713Google Scholar

    [13]

    Li W, Coppens Z J, Besteiro L V, Wang W, Govorov A O, Valentine J 2015 Nat. Commun. 6 8379Google Scholar

    [14]

    Bai J, Yao Y 2021 ACS Nano 15 14263Google Scholar

    [15]

    Ashalley E, Acheampong K, Besteiro L V, Yu P, Neogi A, Govorov A O, Wang Z M 2020 Photonics Res. 8 1213Google Scholar

    [16]

    Chen Z, Zheng S, Tong Z, Yuan X 2022 Optica 9 677Google Scholar

    [17]

    Chen W T, Zhu A Y, Sanjeev V, Khorasaninejad M, Shi Z, Lee E, Capasso F 2018 Nat. Nanotechnol. 13 220Google Scholar

    [18]

    Wang S, Wu P C, Su V, et al. 2018 Nat. Nanotechnol. 13 227Google Scholar

    [19]

    Getman F, Makarenko M, Burguete-Lopez A, Fratalocchi A 2021 Light-Sci. Appl. 10 47Google Scholar

    [20]

    Wu J, Yang Y, Qu Y, Jia L, Zhang Y, Xu X, Chu S T, Little B E, Morandotti R, Jia B, Moss D J 2020 Small 16 1906563Google Scholar

    [21]

    Chen Y, Yin Y, Ma L, Schmidt O G 2021 Adv. Opt. Mater. 9 2100143Google Scholar

    [22]

    Shlager K L, Schneider J B 1995 IEEE Antennas Propag. Mag. 37 39Google Scholar

    [23]

    Dhatt G, Lefrançois E, Touzot G 2012 Finite Element Method (Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons) p1

    [24]

    Zuazua E 2005 SIAM Rev. 47 197Google Scholar

    [25]

    Ma W, Liu Z, Kudyshev Z A, Boltasseva A, Cai W, Liu Y 2021 Nat. Photonics 15 77Google Scholar

    [26]

    Goh G B, Hodas N O, Vishnu A 2017 J. Comput. Chem. 38 1291Google Scholar

    [27]

    Dral P O 2020 J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 11 2336Google Scholar

    [28]

    Paruzzo F M, Hofstetter A, Musil F, De S, Ceriotti M, Emsley L 2018 Nat. Commun. 9 4501Google Scholar

    [29]

    von Lilienfeld O A, Burke K 2020 Nat. Commun. 11 4895Google Scholar

    [30]

    Mater A C, Coote M L 2019 J. Chem. Inf. Model. 59 2545Google Scholar

    [31]

    Schweidtmann A M, Clayton A D, Holmes N, Bradford E, Bourne R A, Lapkin A A 2018 Chem. Eng. J. 352 277Google Scholar

    [32]

    Chen C, Zuo Y, Ye W, Li X, Deng Z, Ong S P 2020 Adv. Energy Mater. 10 1903242Google Scholar

    [33]

    Schleder G R, Padilha A C M, Acosta C M, Costa M, Fazzio A 2019 J. Phys. Mater. 2 32001Google Scholar

    [34]

    Schmidt J, Marques M R G, Botti S, Marques M A L 2019 npj Comput. Mater. 5 83Google Scholar

    [35]

    Zhang Y, Ling C 2018 npj Comput. Mater. 4 25Google Scholar

    [36]

    Bleiziffer P, Schaller K, Riniker S 2018 J. Chem. Inf. Model. 58 579Google Scholar

    [37]

    Carrasquilla J 2020 Adv. Phys. -X 5 1797528Google Scholar

    [38]

    Schütt K T, Gastegger M, Tkatchenko A, Müller K R, Maurer R J 2019 Nat. Commun. 10 5024Google Scholar

    [39]

    von Lilienfeld O A, Müller K, Tkatchenko A 2020 Nat. Rev. Chem. 4 347Google Scholar

    [40]

    沈培鑫, 蒋文杰, 李炜康, 鲁智德, 邓东灵 2021 70 140302Google Scholar

    Shen P X, Jiang W J, Li W K, Lu Z D, Deng D L 2021 Acta Phys. Sin. 70 140302Google Scholar

    [41]

    Bourilkov D 2019 Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 34 1930019Google Scholar

    [42]

    Cirac I, Cranmer K, Daudet L, Schuld M, Tishby N, Vogt-Maranto L, Zdeborová L, Carleo G 2019 Rev. Mod. Phys. 91 45002Google Scholar

    [43]

    Radovic A, Williams M, Rousseau D, Kagan M, Bonacorsi D, Himmel A, Aurisano A, Terao K, Wongjirad T 2018 Nature 560 41Google Scholar

    [44]

    Shlomi J, Battaglia P, Vlimant J 2021 Mach. Learn. :Sci. Technol. 2 21001Google Scholar

    [45]

    Vázquez-Escobar J, Hernández J M, Cárdenas-Montes M 2021 Comput. Phys. Commun. 268 108100Google Scholar

    [46]

    Li Y, Xu Y, Jiang M, Li B, Han T, Chi C, Lin F, Shen B, Zhu X, Lai L, Fang Z 2019 Phys. Rev. Lett. 123 213902Google Scholar

    [47]

    Wang K, Ren X, Chang W, Lu L, Liu D, Zhang M 2020 Photonics Res. 8 528Google Scholar

    [48]

    Meng F, Zhao X, Ding J, et al. 2021 Opt. Lett. 46 1454Google Scholar

    [49]

    Zelaci A, Yasli A, Kalyoncu C, Ademgil H 2021 J. Lightwave Technol. 39 1515Google Scholar

    [50]

    Zhang T, Wang J, Liu Q, Zhou J, Dai J, Han X, Zhou Y, Xu K 2019 Photonics Res. 7 368Google Scholar

    [51]

    Tu X, Xie W, Chen Z, Ge M, Huang T, Song C, Fu H Y 2021 J. Lightwave Technol. 39 2790Google Scholar

    [52]

    Zhang S Y, Zhang C, Zeng Y, Liu D M, Qin Y W, Zhang Z R, Fu S N 2022 IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron. 28 4500110Google Scholar

    [53]

    Dinsdale N J, Wiecha P R, Delaney M, Reynolds J, Ebert M, Zeimpekis I, Thomson D J, Reed G T, Lalanne P, Vynck K, Muskens O L 2021 ACS Photonics 8 283Google Scholar

    [54]

    Idjadi M H, Aflatouni F 2020 Nat. Photonics 14 234Google Scholar

    [55]

    Jing G, Wang P, Wu H, Ren J, Xie Z, Liu J, Ye H, Li Y, Fan D, Chen S 2022 Photonics Res. 10 1462Google Scholar

    [56]

    Yoo D, de León-Pérez F, Pelton M, Lee I, Mohr D A, Raschke M B, Caldwell J D, Martín-Moreno L, Oh S 2021 Nat. Photonics 15 125Google Scholar

    [57]

    Rouxel J R, Fainozzi D, Mankowsky R, et al. 2021 Nat. Photonics 15 499Google Scholar

    [58]

    Cai X, Liu F, Yu A, Qin J, Hatamvand M, Ahmed I, Luo J, Zhang Y, Zhang H, Zhan Y 2022 Light-Sci. Appl. 11 234Google Scholar

    [59]

    Guo Y, Cheng Y, Jiang Y, Cao M, Tang M, Ren W, Ren G 2022 Opt. Commun. 524 128814Google Scholar

    [60]

    Qin H, Huang W, Song B, Chen S 2022 J. Lightwave Technol. 40 5974Google Scholar

    [61]

    Qie J, Khoram E, Liu D, Zhou M, Gao L 2021 Photonics Res. 9 B104Google Scholar

    [62]

    Gostimirovic D, Xu D, Liboiron-Ladouceur O, Grinberg Y 2022 ACS Photonics 9 2623Google Scholar

    [63]

    Zang Y, Yu Z, Xu K, Lan X, Chen M, Yang S, Chen H 2022 J. Lightwave Technol. 40 404Google Scholar

    [64]

    Ren Y, Zhang L, Wang W, Wang X, Lei Y, Xue Y, Sun X, Zhang W 2021 Photonics Res. 9 B247Google Scholar

    [65]

    Zandehshahvar M, Kiarashinejad Y, Zhu M, Maleki H, Brown T, Adibi A 2022 ACS Photonics 9 714Google Scholar

    [66]

    Li T, Chen A, Fan L, Zheng M, Wang J, Lu G, Zhao M, Cheng X, Li W, Liu X, Yin H, Shi L, Zi J 2021 Light-Sci. Appl. 10 154Google Scholar

    [67]

    Malkiel I, Mrejen M, Nagler A, Arieli U, Wolf L, Suchowski H 2018 Light-Sci. Appl. 7 60Google Scholar

    [68]

    Jabin M A, Fok M P 2022 IEEE Photonics Technol. Lett. 34 391Google Scholar

    [69]

    Li R, Gu X, Shen Y, Li K, Li Z, Zhang Z 2022 Nanomaterials 12 1372Google Scholar

    [70]

    Nakadai M, Tanaka K, Asano T, Takahashi Y, Noda S 2019 Appl. Phys. Express 13 12002Google Scholar

    [71]

    Sohn D B, Örsel O E, Bahl G 2021 Nat. Photonics 15 822Google Scholar

    [72]

    Ergoktas M S, Bakan G, Kovalska E, et al. 2021 Nat. Photonics 15 493Google Scholar

    [73]

    Piggott A Y, Lu J, Lagoudakis K G, Petykiewicz J, Babinec T M, Vučković J 2015 Nat. Photonics 9 374Google Scholar

    [74]

    Tahersima M H, Kojima K, Koike-Akino T, Jha D, Wang B, Lin C, Parsons K 2019 Sci. Rep. -UK 9 1368Google Scholar

    [75]

    Zhang Q, Yu H, Barbiero M, Wang B, Gu M 2019 Light-Sci. Appl. 8 42Google Scholar

    [76]

    Yamashita R, Nishio M, Do R K G, Togashi K 2018 Insights Imaging 9 611Google Scholar

    [77]

    Goodfellow I, Pouget-Abadie J, Mirza M, Xu B, Warde-Farley D, Ozair S, Courville A, Bengio Y 2020 Commun. ACM 63 139Google Scholar

    [78]

    Bonyadi M R, Michalewicz Z 2017 Evol. Comput. 25 1Google Scholar

    [79]

    Kennedy J, Eberhart R 1995 Proceedings of ICNN'95-International Conference on Neural Networks, Perth, 27 November–01 December,1995 pp1942–1948

    [80]

    Mirjalili S 2019 Genetic Algorithm (Cham: Springer International Publishing) p43

    [81]

    Maulud D, Abdulazeez A M 2020 J. Appl. Sci. Tech. Trends 1 140Google Scholar

    [82]

    Zhang F, O'Donnell L J 2020 Chapter 7-Support Vector Regression (New York: Academic Press) p123

    [83]

    Kramer O 2013 K-Nearest Neighbors (Berlin: Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg) p13

    [84]

    Cutler A, Cutler D R, Stevens J R 2012 Random Forests (Boston: MA: Springer US) p157

    [85]

    Natekin A, Knoll A 2013 Front. Neurorobot. 7 21Google Scholar

    [86]

    Huo L, Wu H, Zhao C, Tang M 2022 IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron. 28 7600107Google Scholar

    [87]

    Wu W, Liu H, Li L, Long Y, Wang X, Wang Z, Li J, Chang Y 2021 PLoS One 16 e259283Google Scholar

    [88]

    Szegedy C, Ioffe S, Vanhoucke V, Alemi A 2017 Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence 31 11231Google Scholar

    [89]

    Lagaris I E, Likas A, Fotiadis D I 1998 IEEE Trans. Neural Networks 9 987Google Scholar

    [90]

    Raissi M, Perdikaris P, Karniadakis G E 2019 J. Comput. Chem. 378 686Google Scholar

    [91]

    Krenn M, Pollice R, Guo S Y, Aldeghi M, Cervera-Lierta A, Friederich P, Gabriel D P G, Häse F, Jinich A, Nigam A, Yao Z, Aspuru-Guzik A 2022 Nat. Rev. Phys. 4 761Google Scholar

    [92]

    Zhuang F, Qi Z, Duan K, Xi D, Zhu Y, Zhu H, Xiong H, He Q 2021 P. IEEE 109 43Google Scholar

    [93]

    Iten R, Metger T, Wilming H, Del Rio L, Renner R 2020 Phys. Rev. Lett. 124 10508Google Scholar

  • 图 1  基于AI的微纳光学设计年出版文献统计

    Figure 1.  Statistics on the number of published papers on AI based micro/nano optical design.

    图 2  AI微纳光学设计概述

    Figure 2.  Overview of AI based micro/nano optical design.

    图 3  数据集构建过程

    Figure 3.  Dataset construction process.

    图 4  基于结构向量的空芯反谐振光纤样本[48]

    Figure 4.  Structures of the hollow-core anti-resonant fiber[48].

    图 5  波长解复用器 (a) 结构图; (b) 逆向设计过程

    Figure 5.  Wavelength demultiplexer: (a) Structure diagram; (b) reverse design process.

    图 6  集成硅基光学功率分配器结构

    Figure 6.  Integrated silicon-based optical power divider structure.

    图 7  用于FT光纤设计的ANN模型

    Figure 7.  ANN model for FT fiber design.

    图 8  桥式光纤结构

    Figure 8.  Bridge fiber structure.

    图 9  将纳米结构进行编码

    Figure 9.  Encoding the nanostructures.

    图 10  PCF结构

    Figure 10.  PCF structure.

    图 11  用于OAM光纤设计的AI模型

    Figure 11.  AI model for OAM fiber design.

    图 12  基于KNN、决策树算法的 (a) ROC图和(b)预测精度值[48]

    Figure 12.  (a) ROC plot and (b) prediction accuracy values based on KNN, decision tree algorithm[48].

    图 13  AI微纳光学设计发展趋势

    Figure 13.  AI micro/nano optical design trends.

    图 14  “最近与均值向量距离”度量方法示意图

    Figure 14.  Schematic diagram of the “nearest-to-mean vector distance” metric.

    表 1  现有微纳光学设计研究工作

    Table 1.  Current research on micro/nano optical design.

    文献年度设计对象应用领域样本定义标记定义数据集样本数/来源AI实现功能学习任务算法性能度量指标
    [15]2020等离子体超材料材料结构向量圆二色性28106/模拟逆向设计回归DNNMSE
    [19]2021偏振分束器通信结构图像透射率—/实验性能预测回归CNNMSE
    [46]2019手性纳米结构通信结构图像圆二色性10000/实验性能优化回归BoNetMSE
    [47]20203 dB功率分配器、
    解模复用器
    通信像素图像透射率—/实验逆向设计回归digitized adjoint methodMSE
    [48]2021空芯反谐振光纤通信结构向量限制损耗323000/模拟性能预测分类KNN, decision treeAccuracy
    [49]2021光子晶体光纤通信结构向量限制损耗1000/模拟性能预测回归GAN, ANNMSE
    [50]2019等离子体波导通信结构向量透射率20000/模拟性能预测回归ANN, GAAccuracy
    [51]2021光栅耦合器通信结构向量耦合效率—/模拟性能预测回归DNNMSE
    [52]2022模式耦合器通信结构向量有效折射率—/模拟性能预测回归DNN, GAMSE
    [53]2021多端口多模波导通信像素图像透射率2500/模拟性能预测回归ANNMSE
    [55]2022超表面电磁波结构图像反射率、ExEy相位1000/实验逆向设计回归CNNMSE
    [58]2022钙钛矿太阳能电池光伏结构向量PCE能量转换效率—/实验性能预测回归LR, SVR, KNR,
    RFR, GBR, NN
    RMSE, MAE
    [59]2022平顶光束激光器激光器结构向量折射率—/模拟逆向设计回归ANNMSE
    [60]2022光纤通信结构向量色散, 折射率差1368/模拟性能预测/
    逆向设计
    回归/分类PSO、MOPSOMSE
    [61]2021超表面通信结构图像散射体的辐射模式98000/模拟性能预测回归DNNL2 loss
    [62]2022微纳硅基器件加工结构图像distance50680/实验性能预测回归CNNBCE
    [63]2022光纤传输模型通信结构向量透射率—/模拟性能预测回归PINN
    [64]2021硅基光学器件通信结构向量透射率1000/模拟性能预测回归DNN, GARMSE
    [65]2022光学纳米结构通信结构向量Latent Dimension8000/模拟逆向设计回归DNNMSE
    [66]2021光栅轮廓重建通信结构向量反射率—/实验逆向设计回归DNN
    [67]2018等离子体纳米结构通信结构向量透射率1500/模拟逆向设计回归DNNMSE
    [68]2022光子晶体光纤通信结构向量(PCF)各项参数2515/模拟性能预测回归ANNMSE
    [69]2022光子晶体通信结构图像Q参数, 纳米结构V12750/实验性能预测回归CNNMSE
    [70]2020光子晶体通信结构向量频率—/实验性能优化回归DNN
    [54]2020相位噪声滤波器通信
    [56]2020等离子体-声子耦合器传感
    [57]2021X射线瞬态光栅传感
    [71]2021光隔离器通信
    [72]2021基于石墨烯的
    多光谱电光表面
    材料
    DownLoad: CSV

    表 2  定义HC-ARF样本的结构参数向量

    Table 2.  Structure-parameter vector for defining HC-ARF samples.

    No.SymbolsRangeDescription
    1s11, 2, 3Structural style of the first tubes
    2s20, 1, 2, 3Structural style of the second tubes
    3N5—10Number of first/second tubes
    4Dcore30 µmCore diameter
    5Ma_1c20—40 µmMajor axis of the first cladding tube
    6Mi_1c20—40 µmMinor axis of the first cladding tube
    7Ma_2c10—20 µmMajor axis of the second cladding tube
    8Mi_2c10—20 µmMinor axis of the second cladding tube
    9Ma_2n0.3—0.8·Ma_2cMajor axis of the second nested tube
    10Mi_2n0.3—0.8·Ma_2nMinor axis of the second nested tube
    11Ma_1n0.3—0.8·Ma_1cMajor axis of the first nested tube
    12Mi_1n0.3—0.8·Ma_1nMinor axis of the first nested tube
    13t_1c0.3—0.7 µmThickness of the first cladding tube
    14t_1n0.3—0.7 µmThickness of the first nested tube
    15t_2c0.3—0.7 µmThickness of the second cladding tube
    16t_2n0.3—0.7 µmThickness of the second nested tube
    DownLoad: CSV

    表 3  混淆矩阵

    Table 3.  Confusion matrix.

    混淆矩阵真实值
    PositiveNegative


    PositiveTrue positive (TP)False positive (FP)
    NegativeFalse negative (FN)True negative (TN)
    DownLoad: CSV
    Baidu
  • [1]

    李涛, 祝世宁 2022 科学观察 17 63Google Scholar

    Li T, Zhu S N 2022 Science Focus 17 63Google Scholar

    [2]

    Zhang Y, He Y, Wu J, Jiang X, Liu R, Qiu C, Jiang X, Yang J, Tremblay C, Su Y 2016 Opt. Express 24 6586Google Scholar

    [3]

    Hu Y, Yu M, Zhu D, et al. 2021 Nature 599 587Google Scholar

    [4]

    Ham B S 2020 Sci. Rep. -UK 10 7309Google Scholar

    [5]

    Xie C, Zou X, Zou F, Yan L, Pan W, Zhang Y 2021 Chin. Phys. B 30 120703Google Scholar

    [6]

    Shibayama J, Kawai H, Yamauchi J, Nakano H 2019 Opt. Commun. 452 360Google Scholar

    [7]

    Chen S, Xie Z, Ye H, Wang X, Guo Z, He Y, Li Y, Yuan X, Fan D 2021 Light-Sci. Appl. 10 222Google Scholar

    [8]

    De M, Gangopadhyay T K, Singh V K 2019 Sensors 19 464Google Scholar

    [9]

    Portosi V, Laneve D, Falconi M C, Prudenzano F 2019 Sensors 19 1892Google Scholar

    [10]

    Yu R, Chen Y, Shui L, Xiao L 2020 Sensors 20 2996Google Scholar

    [11]

    Meinecke S, Drzewietzki L, Weber C, Lingnau B, Breuer S, Lüdge K 2019 Sci. Rep. -UK 9 1783Google Scholar

    [12]

    Fan Y, van Rees A, van der Slot P, Mak J, Oldenbeuving R M, Hoekman M, Geskus D, Roeloffzen C, Boller K J 2020 Opt. Express 28 21713Google Scholar

    [13]

    Li W, Coppens Z J, Besteiro L V, Wang W, Govorov A O, Valentine J 2015 Nat. Commun. 6 8379Google Scholar

    [14]

    Bai J, Yao Y 2021 ACS Nano 15 14263Google Scholar

    [15]

    Ashalley E, Acheampong K, Besteiro L V, Yu P, Neogi A, Govorov A O, Wang Z M 2020 Photonics Res. 8 1213Google Scholar

    [16]

    Chen Z, Zheng S, Tong Z, Yuan X 2022 Optica 9 677Google Scholar

    [17]

    Chen W T, Zhu A Y, Sanjeev V, Khorasaninejad M, Shi Z, Lee E, Capasso F 2018 Nat. Nanotechnol. 13 220Google Scholar

    [18]

    Wang S, Wu P C, Su V, et al. 2018 Nat. Nanotechnol. 13 227Google Scholar

    [19]

    Getman F, Makarenko M, Burguete-Lopez A, Fratalocchi A 2021 Light-Sci. Appl. 10 47Google Scholar

    [20]

    Wu J, Yang Y, Qu Y, Jia L, Zhang Y, Xu X, Chu S T, Little B E, Morandotti R, Jia B, Moss D J 2020 Small 16 1906563Google Scholar

    [21]

    Chen Y, Yin Y, Ma L, Schmidt O G 2021 Adv. Opt. Mater. 9 2100143Google Scholar

    [22]

    Shlager K L, Schneider J B 1995 IEEE Antennas Propag. Mag. 37 39Google Scholar

    [23]

    Dhatt G, Lefrançois E, Touzot G 2012 Finite Element Method (Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons) p1

    [24]

    Zuazua E 2005 SIAM Rev. 47 197Google Scholar

    [25]

    Ma W, Liu Z, Kudyshev Z A, Boltasseva A, Cai W, Liu Y 2021 Nat. Photonics 15 77Google Scholar

    [26]

    Goh G B, Hodas N O, Vishnu A 2017 J. Comput. Chem. 38 1291Google Scholar

    [27]

    Dral P O 2020 J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 11 2336Google Scholar

    [28]

    Paruzzo F M, Hofstetter A, Musil F, De S, Ceriotti M, Emsley L 2018 Nat. Commun. 9 4501Google Scholar

    [29]

    von Lilienfeld O A, Burke K 2020 Nat. Commun. 11 4895Google Scholar

    [30]

    Mater A C, Coote M L 2019 J. Chem. Inf. Model. 59 2545Google Scholar

    [31]

    Schweidtmann A M, Clayton A D, Holmes N, Bradford E, Bourne R A, Lapkin A A 2018 Chem. Eng. J. 352 277Google Scholar

    [32]

    Chen C, Zuo Y, Ye W, Li X, Deng Z, Ong S P 2020 Adv. Energy Mater. 10 1903242Google Scholar

    [33]

    Schleder G R, Padilha A C M, Acosta C M, Costa M, Fazzio A 2019 J. Phys. Mater. 2 32001Google Scholar

    [34]

    Schmidt J, Marques M R G, Botti S, Marques M A L 2019 npj Comput. Mater. 5 83Google Scholar

    [35]

    Zhang Y, Ling C 2018 npj Comput. Mater. 4 25Google Scholar

    [36]

    Bleiziffer P, Schaller K, Riniker S 2018 J. Chem. Inf. Model. 58 579Google Scholar

    [37]

    Carrasquilla J 2020 Adv. Phys. -X 5 1797528Google Scholar

    [38]

    Schütt K T, Gastegger M, Tkatchenko A, Müller K R, Maurer R J 2019 Nat. Commun. 10 5024Google Scholar

    [39]

    von Lilienfeld O A, Müller K, Tkatchenko A 2020 Nat. Rev. Chem. 4 347Google Scholar

    [40]

    沈培鑫, 蒋文杰, 李炜康, 鲁智德, 邓东灵 2021 70 140302Google Scholar

    Shen P X, Jiang W J, Li W K, Lu Z D, Deng D L 2021 Acta Phys. Sin. 70 140302Google Scholar

    [41]

    Bourilkov D 2019 Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 34 1930019Google Scholar

    [42]

    Cirac I, Cranmer K, Daudet L, Schuld M, Tishby N, Vogt-Maranto L, Zdeborová L, Carleo G 2019 Rev. Mod. Phys. 91 45002Google Scholar

    [43]

    Radovic A, Williams M, Rousseau D, Kagan M, Bonacorsi D, Himmel A, Aurisano A, Terao K, Wongjirad T 2018 Nature 560 41Google Scholar

    [44]

    Shlomi J, Battaglia P, Vlimant J 2021 Mach. Learn. :Sci. Technol. 2 21001Google Scholar

    [45]

    Vázquez-Escobar J, Hernández J M, Cárdenas-Montes M 2021 Comput. Phys. Commun. 268 108100Google Scholar

    [46]

    Li Y, Xu Y, Jiang M, Li B, Han T, Chi C, Lin F, Shen B, Zhu X, Lai L, Fang Z 2019 Phys. Rev. Lett. 123 213902Google Scholar

    [47]

    Wang K, Ren X, Chang W, Lu L, Liu D, Zhang M 2020 Photonics Res. 8 528Google Scholar

    [48]

    Meng F, Zhao X, Ding J, et al. 2021 Opt. Lett. 46 1454Google Scholar

    [49]

    Zelaci A, Yasli A, Kalyoncu C, Ademgil H 2021 J. Lightwave Technol. 39 1515Google Scholar

    [50]

    Zhang T, Wang J, Liu Q, Zhou J, Dai J, Han X, Zhou Y, Xu K 2019 Photonics Res. 7 368Google Scholar

    [51]

    Tu X, Xie W, Chen Z, Ge M, Huang T, Song C, Fu H Y 2021 J. Lightwave Technol. 39 2790Google Scholar

    [52]

    Zhang S Y, Zhang C, Zeng Y, Liu D M, Qin Y W, Zhang Z R, Fu S N 2022 IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron. 28 4500110Google Scholar

    [53]

    Dinsdale N J, Wiecha P R, Delaney M, Reynolds J, Ebert M, Zeimpekis I, Thomson D J, Reed G T, Lalanne P, Vynck K, Muskens O L 2021 ACS Photonics 8 283Google Scholar

    [54]

    Idjadi M H, Aflatouni F 2020 Nat. Photonics 14 234Google Scholar

    [55]

    Jing G, Wang P, Wu H, Ren J, Xie Z, Liu J, Ye H, Li Y, Fan D, Chen S 2022 Photonics Res. 10 1462Google Scholar

    [56]

    Yoo D, de León-Pérez F, Pelton M, Lee I, Mohr D A, Raschke M B, Caldwell J D, Martín-Moreno L, Oh S 2021 Nat. Photonics 15 125Google Scholar

    [57]

    Rouxel J R, Fainozzi D, Mankowsky R, et al. 2021 Nat. Photonics 15 499Google Scholar

    [58]

    Cai X, Liu F, Yu A, Qin J, Hatamvand M, Ahmed I, Luo J, Zhang Y, Zhang H, Zhan Y 2022 Light-Sci. Appl. 11 234Google Scholar

    [59]

    Guo Y, Cheng Y, Jiang Y, Cao M, Tang M, Ren W, Ren G 2022 Opt. Commun. 524 128814Google Scholar

    [60]

    Qin H, Huang W, Song B, Chen S 2022 J. Lightwave Technol. 40 5974Google Scholar

    [61]

    Qie J, Khoram E, Liu D, Zhou M, Gao L 2021 Photonics Res. 9 B104Google Scholar

    [62]

    Gostimirovic D, Xu D, Liboiron-Ladouceur O, Grinberg Y 2022 ACS Photonics 9 2623Google Scholar

    [63]

    Zang Y, Yu Z, Xu K, Lan X, Chen M, Yang S, Chen H 2022 J. Lightwave Technol. 40 404Google Scholar

    [64]

    Ren Y, Zhang L, Wang W, Wang X, Lei Y, Xue Y, Sun X, Zhang W 2021 Photonics Res. 9 B247Google Scholar

    [65]

    Zandehshahvar M, Kiarashinejad Y, Zhu M, Maleki H, Brown T, Adibi A 2022 ACS Photonics 9 714Google Scholar

    [66]

    Li T, Chen A, Fan L, Zheng M, Wang J, Lu G, Zhao M, Cheng X, Li W, Liu X, Yin H, Shi L, Zi J 2021 Light-Sci. Appl. 10 154Google Scholar

    [67]

    Malkiel I, Mrejen M, Nagler A, Arieli U, Wolf L, Suchowski H 2018 Light-Sci. Appl. 7 60Google Scholar

    [68]

    Jabin M A, Fok M P 2022 IEEE Photonics Technol. Lett. 34 391Google Scholar

    [69]

    Li R, Gu X, Shen Y, Li K, Li Z, Zhang Z 2022 Nanomaterials 12 1372Google Scholar

    [70]

    Nakadai M, Tanaka K, Asano T, Takahashi Y, Noda S 2019 Appl. Phys. Express 13 12002Google Scholar

    [71]

    Sohn D B, Örsel O E, Bahl G 2021 Nat. Photonics 15 822Google Scholar

    [72]

    Ergoktas M S, Bakan G, Kovalska E, et al. 2021 Nat. Photonics 15 493Google Scholar

    [73]

    Piggott A Y, Lu J, Lagoudakis K G, Petykiewicz J, Babinec T M, Vučković J 2015 Nat. Photonics 9 374Google Scholar

    [74]

    Tahersima M H, Kojima K, Koike-Akino T, Jha D, Wang B, Lin C, Parsons K 2019 Sci. Rep. -UK 9 1368Google Scholar

    [75]

    Zhang Q, Yu H, Barbiero M, Wang B, Gu M 2019 Light-Sci. Appl. 8 42Google Scholar

    [76]

    Yamashita R, Nishio M, Do R K G, Togashi K 2018 Insights Imaging 9 611Google Scholar

    [77]

    Goodfellow I, Pouget-Abadie J, Mirza M, Xu B, Warde-Farley D, Ozair S, Courville A, Bengio Y 2020 Commun. ACM 63 139Google Scholar

    [78]

    Bonyadi M R, Michalewicz Z 2017 Evol. Comput. 25 1Google Scholar

    [79]

    Kennedy J, Eberhart R 1995 Proceedings of ICNN'95-International Conference on Neural Networks, Perth, 27 November–01 December,1995 pp1942–1948

    [80]

    Mirjalili S 2019 Genetic Algorithm (Cham: Springer International Publishing) p43

    [81]

    Maulud D, Abdulazeez A M 2020 J. Appl. Sci. Tech. Trends 1 140Google Scholar

    [82]

    Zhang F, O'Donnell L J 2020 Chapter 7-Support Vector Regression (New York: Academic Press) p123

    [83]

    Kramer O 2013 K-Nearest Neighbors (Berlin: Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg) p13

    [84]

    Cutler A, Cutler D R, Stevens J R 2012 Random Forests (Boston: MA: Springer US) p157

    [85]

    Natekin A, Knoll A 2013 Front. Neurorobot. 7 21Google Scholar

    [86]

    Huo L, Wu H, Zhao C, Tang M 2022 IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron. 28 7600107Google Scholar

    [87]

    Wu W, Liu H, Li L, Long Y, Wang X, Wang Z, Li J, Chang Y 2021 PLoS One 16 e259283Google Scholar

    [88]

    Szegedy C, Ioffe S, Vanhoucke V, Alemi A 2017 Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence 31 11231Google Scholar

    [89]

    Lagaris I E, Likas A, Fotiadis D I 1998 IEEE Trans. Neural Networks 9 987Google Scholar

    [90]

    Raissi M, Perdikaris P, Karniadakis G E 2019 J. Comput. Chem. 378 686Google Scholar

    [91]

    Krenn M, Pollice R, Guo S Y, Aldeghi M, Cervera-Lierta A, Friederich P, Gabriel D P G, Häse F, Jinich A, Nigam A, Yao Z, Aspuru-Guzik A 2022 Nat. Rev. Phys. 4 761Google Scholar

    [92]

    Zhuang F, Qi Z, Duan K, Xi D, Zhu Y, Zhu H, Xiong H, He Q 2021 P. IEEE 109 43Google Scholar

    [93]

    Iten R, Metger T, Wilming H, Del Rio L, Renner R 2020 Phys. Rev. Lett. 124 10508Google Scholar

  • [1] Shen Xiao-Yang, Cheng Yi-Hao, Xia Lin. Design of compact high resolution imaging system for cold atom experiments. Acta Physica Sinica, 2024, 73(6): 066701. doi: 10.7498/aps.73.20231689
    [2] Huang Yi-Fan, Xing Yang-Guang, Shen Wen-Jie, Peng Ji-Long, Dai Shu-Wu, Wang Ying, Duan Zi-Wen, Yan Lei, Liu Yue, Li Lin. Optical design of sub-angular second spatially resolved solar extreme ultraviolet broadband imaging spectrometer. Acta Physica Sinica, 2024, 73(3): 039501. doi: 10.7498/aps.73.20231481
    [3] Wu Chang-Mao, Tang Xiong-Xin, Xia Yuan-Yuan, Yang Han-Xiang, Xu Fan-Jiang. High precision ray tracing method for space camera in optical design. Acta Physica Sinica, 2023, 72(8): 084201. doi: 10.7498/aps.72.20222463
    [4] Qiu Yi-Geng, Fan Yuan-Yuan, Yan Bo-Xia, Wang Yan-Wei, Wu Yi-Hang, Han Zhe, Qi Yan, Lu Ping. Design and experiment of light field shaping system for three-dimensional extended light source used in photoacoustic spectrometer. Acta Physica Sinica, 2021, 70(20): 204201. doi: 10.7498/aps.70.20210691
    [5] Zhang Juan, Jiao Zhi-Qiang, Yan Hua-Jie, Chen Fu-Dong, Huang Qing-Yu, Kang Liang-Liang, Liu Xiao-Yun, Wang Lu, Yuan Guang-Cai. Influence of microcavity effect on the performance of top emission tandem blue organic light emitting devices. Acta Physica Sinica, 2020, 69(9): 096104. doi: 10.7498/aps.69.20191576
    [6] Xu Xiang-Xin, Chang Jun, Wu Chu-Han, Song Da-Lin. Local hybrid optical encryption system based on double random phase encoding. Acta Physica Sinica, 2020, 69(20): 204201. doi: 10.7498/aps.69.20200478
    [7] Feng Shuai, Chang Jun, Hu Yao-Yao, Wu Hao, Liu Xin. Design and analysis of polarization imaging lidar and short wave infrared composite optical receiving system. Acta Physica Sinica, 2020, 69(24): 244202. doi: 10.7498/aps.69.20200920
    [8] Liu Fei, Wei Ya-Zhe, Han Ping-Li, Liu Jia-Wei, Shao Xiao-Peng. Design of monocentric wide field-of-view and high-resolution computational imaging system. Acta Physica Sinica, 2019, 68(8): 084201. doi: 10.7498/aps.68.20182229
    [9] Feng Shuai, Chang Jun, Niu Ya-Jun, Mu Yu, Liu Xin. A method of designing asymmetric double-sided off-axis aspheric mirror detection compensation zoom light path. Acta Physica Sinica, 2019, 68(11): 114201. doi: 10.7498/aps.68.20182253
    [10] Zhang Xu-Lin, Yang Wei, Luo Tong-Zheng, Huang Yan-Yan, Lei Lei, Li Gui-Jun, Xu Ping. Two-dimensional distribution expressions of micro-prism on bottom surface of partial integrated light guide plate. Acta Physica Sinica, 2019, 68(21): 218501. doi: 10.7498/aps.68.20190854
    [11] Xu Ping, Yang Wei, Zhang Xu-Lin, Luo Tong-Zheng, Huang Yan-Yan. Two-dimensional distribution design of micro-prism for partial integrated light guide plate. Acta Physica Sinica, 2019, 68(3): 038502. doi: 10.7498/aps.68.20181684
    [12] Cao Chao, Liao Zhi-Yuan, Bai Yu, Fan Zhen-Jie, Liao Sheng. Initial configuration design of off-axis reflective optical system based on vector aberration theory. Acta Physica Sinica, 2019, 68(13): 134201. doi: 10.7498/aps.68.20190299
    [13] Liu Yan, Li Jian-Jun, Gao Dong-Yang, Zhai Wen-Chao, Hu You-Bo, Guo Yuan-Yuan, Xia Mao-Peng, Zheng Xiao-Bing. Research on the time-correlation characterisrtic of correlated photon circles generated by the type-I spontaneous parametric down-conversion. Acta Physica Sinica, 2016, 65(19): 194211. doi: 10.7498/aps.65.194211
    [14] Lü Xiang-Bo, Zhu Jing, Yang Bao-Xi, Huang Hui-Jie. An approach for calculating the optical structure based on ybar-y diagram. Acta Physica Sinica, 2015, 64(11): 114201. doi: 10.7498/aps.64.114201
    [15] Shen Ben-Lan, Chang Jun, Wang Xi, Niu Ya-Jun, Feng Shu-Long. Design of the active zoom system with three-mirror. Acta Physica Sinica, 2014, 63(14): 144201. doi: 10.7498/aps.63.144201
    [16] Pei Lin-Lin, Lü Qun-Bo, Wang Jian-Wei, Liu Yang-Yang. Optical system design of the coded aperture imaging spectrometer. Acta Physica Sinica, 2014, 63(21): 210702. doi: 10.7498/aps.63.210702
    [17] Ren Hong-Liang. Design and error analysis for optical tweezers based on finite conjugate microscope. Acta Physica Sinica, 2013, 62(10): 100701. doi: 10.7498/aps.62.100701
    [18] Shu Fang-Jie. Analysis of features of the microdisk cavity perpendicular coupler. Acta Physica Sinica, 2013, 62(6): 064212. doi: 10.7498/aps.62.064212
    [19] Dong Ke-Yan, Sun Qiang, Li Yong-Da, Zhang Yun-Cui, Wang Jian, Ge Zhen-Jie, Sun Jin-Xia, Liu Jian-Zhuo. Design of a refractive/diffractive hybrid infrared bifocal optical system. Acta Physica Sinica, 2006, 55(9): 4602-4607. doi: 10.7498/aps.55.4602
    [20] Wang Fang, Zhu Qi-Hua, Jiang Dong-Bin, Zhang Qing-Quan, Deng Wu, Jing Feng. Optimization of optical design of the master amplifier in multi-pass off-axis amplification system. Acta Physica Sinica, 2006, 55(10): 5277-5282. doi: 10.7498/aps.55.5277
Metrics
  • Abstract views:  7779
  • PDF Downloads:  248
  • Cited By: 0
Publishing process
  • Received Date:  15 February 2023
  • Accepted Date:  03 April 2023
  • Available Online:  12 April 2023
  • Published Online:  05 June 2023

/

返回文章
返回
Baidu
map