Search

Article

x

留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

Numerical study of discharge characteristics of atmospheric dielectric barrier discharges by integrating machine learning

Ai Fei Liu Zhi-Bing Zhang Yuan-Tao

Citation:

Numerical study of discharge characteristics of atmospheric dielectric barrier discharges by integrating machine learning

Ai Fei, Liu Zhi-Bing, Zhang Yuan-Tao
PDF
HTML
Get Citation
  • In recent years, with the development of gas discharge technology at atmospheric pressure, the application of low temperature plasma has received widespread attention in pollution prevention, disinfection, sterilization, energy conversion and other fields. Atmospheric dielectric barrier discharge is widely used to produce low temperature plasma in various applications, which is usually numerically investigated by using fluid models. The unique advantages of machine learning in various branches of physics have been discovered with the advancement of big data processing technology. Recent studies have shown that artificial neural networks with multiple hidden layers have a pivotal role in the simulation of complex datasets. In this work, a fully connected multilayer BP (back propagation) network together with a universal hidden layer structure is developed to explore the characteristics of one or more current pulses per half voltage cycle of atmospheric dielectric barrier discharge. The calculated data are used as training sets, and the discharge characteristics such as current density, electron density, ion density, and electric field of atmospheric dielectric barrier discharge can be quickly predicted by using artificial neural network program. The computational results show that for a given training set, the constructed machine learning program can describe the properties of atmospheric dielectric barrier discharge with almost the same accuracy as the fluid model. Also, the computational efficiency of the machine learning is much higher than that of the fluid model. In addition, the use of machine learning programs can also greatly extend the calculation range of parameters. Limiting discharge parameter range is considered as a major challenge for numerical calculation. By substituting a relatively limited set of training data obtained from the fluid model into the machine learning, the discharge characteristics can be accurately predicted within a given range of discharge parameters, leading an almost infinite set of data to be generated, which is of great significance for studying the influence of discharge parameters on discharge evolution. The examples in this paper show that the combination of machine learning and fluid models can greatly improve the computational efficiency, which can enhance the understanding of discharge plasmas.
      Corresponding author: Zhang Yuan-Tao, ytzhang@sdu.edu.cn
    • Funds: Project supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 11975142)
    [1]

    Von Woedtke T, Metelmann H R, Weltmann K D 2014 Contrib. Plasma Phys. 54 104Google Scholar

    [2]

    Agarwal P, Girshick S L 2014 Plasma Chem. Plasma Process. 34 489Google Scholar

    [3]

    Chen Q, Li J, Li Y 2015 J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. 48 424005Google Scholar

    [4]

    Von Keudell A, Schulz-Von Der Gathen V 2017 Plasma Sources Sci. Technol. 26 113001Google Scholar

    [5]

    Bruggeman P J, Iza F, Brandenburg R 2017 Plasma Sources Sci. Technol. 26 123002Google Scholar

    [6]

    Zhang Y T, Chi Y Y, He J 2014 Plasma Process. Polym. 11 639Google Scholar

    [7]

    Wang X C, Bai J X, Zhang T H, Sun Y, Zhang Y T 2022 Vacuum 203 111200Google Scholar

    [8]

    张泰恒, 王绪成, 张远涛 2021 70 215201Google Scholar

    Zhang T H, Wang X C, Zhang Y T 2021 Acta Phys. Sin. 70 215201Google Scholar

    [9]

    Iqbal M M, Turner M M 2015 Plasma Process. Polym. 12 1104Google Scholar

    [10]

    Zhang Y T, Wang D Z, Kong M G 2005 J. Appl. Phys. 98 113308Google Scholar

    [11]

    Alves L, Bogaerts A, Guerra V, Turner M 2018 Plasma Sources Sci. Technol. 27 023002Google Scholar

    [12]

    Wang G, Kuang Y, Zhang Y T 2019 Plasma Sci. Technol. 22 015404Google Scholar

    [13]

    Brodtkorb A R, Hagen T R, Sætra M L 2013 J. Parallel Distrib. Comput. 73 4Google Scholar

    [14]

    Pandey M, Fernandez M, Gentile F, Isayev O, Tropsha A, Stern A C, Cherkasov A 2022 Nat. Mach. Intell. 4 211Google Scholar

    [15]

    Eklund A, Dufort P, Forsberg D, LaConte S M 2013 Med. Image Anal. 17 1073Google Scholar

    [16]

    Carleo G, Cirac I, Cranmer K, Daudet L, Schuld M, Tishby N, Vogt-Maranto L, Zdeborová L 2019 Rev. Mod. Phys. 91 045002Google Scholar

    [17]

    Piccione A, Berkery J, Sabbagh S, Andreopoulos Y 2020 Nucl. Fusion 60 046033Google Scholar

    [18]

    Fu Y, Eldon D, Erickson K, Kleijwegt K, Lupin-Jimenez L, Boyer M D, Eidietis N, Barbour N, Izacard O, Kolemen E 2020 Phys. Plasma 27 022501Google Scholar

    [19]

    Mesbah A, Graves D B 2019 J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. 52 30LT02Google Scholar

    [20]

    Jordan M I, Mitchell T M 2015 Science 349 255Google Scholar

    [21]

    Wang H, Lei Z, Zhang X, Zhou B, Peng J 2019 Energy Convers. Manage. 198 111799Google Scholar

    [22]

    Bonzanini A D, Shao K, Stancampiano A, Graves D B, Mesbah A 2021 IEEE Trans. Radiat. Plasma Med. Sci. 6 16Google Scholar

    [23]

    Hong Y, Hou B, Jiang H, Zhang J 2020 Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Comput. Mol. Sci. 10 e1450Google Scholar

    [24]

    Abiodun O I, Jantan A, Omolara A E, Dada K V, Mohamed N A, Arshad H 2018 Heliyon 4 e00938Google Scholar

    [25]

    Dongare A, Kharde R, Kachare A D 2012 IJEIT 2 189

    [26]

    Kukreja H, Bharath N, Siddesh C, Kuldeep S 2016 Int. J. Adv. Res. Innov. Ideas Educ. 1 27

    [27]

    Han J, Jentzen A, Weinan E 2018 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 115 8505Google Scholar

    [28]

    Zhong L, Gu Q, Wu B 2020 Comput. Phys. Commun. 257 107496Google Scholar

    [29]

    张远涛, 王德真, 王艳辉 2005 54 4808Google Scholar

    Zhang Y T, Wang D Z, Wang Y H 2005 Acta Phys. Sin. 54 4808Google Scholar

    [30]

    王艳辉, 王德真 2003 52 1694Google Scholar

    Wang Y H, Wang D Z 2003 Acta Phys. Sin. 52 1694Google Scholar

    [31]

    Massines F, Rabehi A, Decomps P, Gadri R B, Ségur P, Mayoux C 1998 J. Appl. Phys. 83 2950Google Scholar

    [32]

    Zhang Y T, Wang D Z, Kong M G 2006 J. Appl. Phys. 100 063304Google Scholar

    [33]

    He J, Zhang Y T 2012 Plasma Process. Polym. 9 919Google Scholar

    [34]

    Wang Y, Zhang Y, Wang D Z, Kong M G 2007 Appl. Phys. Lett. 90 071501Google Scholar

    [35]

    Yuan X, Raja L L 2003 IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci. 31 495Google Scholar

    [36]

    Song S, Guo Y, Choe W, Zhang J, Zhang J, Shi J 2012 Phys. Plasma 19 123508Google Scholar

    [37]

    Zhang Y T, Wang Y H 2018 Phys. Plasma 25 023509Google Scholar

    [38]

    Simeni M S, Zheng Y, Barnat E V, Bruggeman P J 2021 Plasma Sources Sci. Technol. 30 055004Google Scholar

    [39]

    王艳辉 2006 博士学位论文 (大连: 大连理工大学)

    Wang Y H 2006 Ph. D. Dissertation (Dalian: Dalian University of Technology) (in Chinese)

    [40]

    Vanraes P, Nikiforov A, Bogaerts A, Leys C 2018 Sci. Rep. 8 1Google Scholar

    [41]

    Massines F, Segur P, Gherardi N, Khamphan C, Ricard A 2003 Surf. Coat. Tech. 174 8Google Scholar

    [42]

    徐学基, 诸定昌 1996 气体放电物理 (上海: 复旦大学出版社) 第277页

    Xu X J, Zhu D C 1996 Discharge Physics of Gas (Shanghai: Fudan University Press) p277 (in Chinese)

    [43]

    刘勇, 何湘宁, 马飞 2005 高电压技术 31 55Google Scholar

    Liu Y, He X N, Ma F 2005 High Volt. Eng. 31 55Google Scholar

    [44]

    Sadeghi B 2000 J. Mater. Process. Technol. 103 411Google Scholar

    [45]

    Gawehn E, Hiss J A, Brown J B, Schneider G 2018 Expert Opin. Drug Discovery 13 579Google Scholar

    [46]

    He J, Hu J T, Liu D W, Zhang Y T 2013 Plasma Sources Sci. Technol. 22 035008Google Scholar

    [47]

    Golubovskii Y B, Maiorov V, Behnke J, Behnke J 2002 J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. 36 39Google Scholar

  • 图 1  训练数据

    Figure 1.  Training data

    图 2  基于大气压介质阻挡放电特性构造的人工神经网络图

    Figure 2.  Diagram of artificial neural network constructed based on the characteristics of atmospheric pressure dielectric barrier discharge

    图 3  通过机器学习预测He等离子体在频率为10 kHz下的电流密度, 并与流体模拟的结果进行比较 (a) V0 = 2150 V下的电流密度; (b) V0 = 2450 V下的电流密度

    Figure 3.  Prediction of current density of He plasma at ambient pressure (f = 10 kHz) via machine learning with comparison of the results by fluid simulation: (a) Current density at ambient pressure (V0 = 2150 V); (b) current density at ambient pressure (V0 = 2450 V)

    图 4  通过机器学习预测He等离子体在f = 10 kHz下的电子密度、离子密度和电场分布, 并与流体模拟的结果进行比较 (a) 电子密度与离子密度; (b) 电场强度

    Figure 4.  Prediction of electron density, ion density and electric field of He plasma at ambient pressure (f = 10 kHz) via machine learning with comparison of the results by fluid simulation: (a) Electron density and ion density; (b) electric field

    图 5  电流密度峰值随电压幅值的变化

    Figure 5.  Peak current density as a function of amplitude of applied voltage

    图 6  电流密度峰值时刻的最大电子密度与最大电场强度随电压幅值的变化

    Figure 6.  Maximum electron density and electric field at the moment when the current density gets to the peak value as a function of amplitude of applied voltage

    图 7  通过机器学习预测He等离子体在V0 = 2000 V下的电流密度, 并与流体模拟的结果进行比较 (a) f = 14.05 kHz下的电流密度; (b) f = 29.05 kHz下的电流密度

    Figure 7.  Prediction of current density of He plasma at ambient pressure (V0 = 2000 V) via machine learning with comparison of the results by fluid simulation: (a) Current density at ambient pressure (f = 14.05 kHz); (b) current density at ambient pressure (f = 29.05 kHz)

    图 8  通过机器学习预测He等离子体在V0 = 2000 V下的电子密度、离子密度和电场分布, 并与流体模型模拟的结果进行比较 (a)电子密度与离子密度; (b) 电场强度

    Figure 8.  Prediction of electron density, ion density and electric field of He plasma at ambient pressure (V0 = 2000 V) via machine learning with comparison of the results by fluid simulation: (a) Electron density and ion density; (b) electric field

    图 9  不同频率下的电流密度峰值

    Figure 9.  Peak current density at different frequencies

    图 10  不同频率下最大电流时刻的电子密度峰值和电场强度峰值

    Figure 10.  Peak electron density and peak electric field intensity at the moment of maximum current at different frequencies

    图 11  通过机器学习预测He等离子体在多输入属性变化下的电流密度, 并与流体模拟的结果进行比较 (a) f = 14.05 kHz下的电流密度; (b) f = 29.05 kHz下的电流密度

    Figure 11.  Prediction of current density of He plasma under the change of multi input attributes machine learning with comparison of the results by fluid simulation: (a) Current density at ambient pressure (f = 14.05 kHz); (b) current density at ambient pressure (f = 29.05 kHz)

    图 12  通过机器学习预测He等离子体在多输入属性变化下的电子密度和离子密度, 并与流体模拟的结果进行比较 (a) f = 14.05 kHz的电子密度; (b) f = 29.05 kHz的离子密度

    Figure 12.  Prediction of electron density and ion density of He plasma under the change of multi input attributes via machine learning with comparison of the results by fluid simulation: (a) Electron density at ambient pressure (f = 14.05 kHz); (b) ion density at ambient pressure (f = 29.05 kHz)

    图 13  通过机器学习预测He等离子体在多输入参数变化下的电场强度分布, 并与流体模拟的结果进行比较 (a) f = 14.05 kHz的场强分布; (b) f = 29.05 kHz的场强分布

    Figure 13.  Prediction of electric field of He plasma under the change of multi input attributes via machine learning with comparison of the results by fluid simulation: (a) Electric field at ambient pressure (f = 14.05 kHz); (b) electric field at ambient pressure (f = 29.05 kHz)

    Baidu
  • [1]

    Von Woedtke T, Metelmann H R, Weltmann K D 2014 Contrib. Plasma Phys. 54 104Google Scholar

    [2]

    Agarwal P, Girshick S L 2014 Plasma Chem. Plasma Process. 34 489Google Scholar

    [3]

    Chen Q, Li J, Li Y 2015 J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. 48 424005Google Scholar

    [4]

    Von Keudell A, Schulz-Von Der Gathen V 2017 Plasma Sources Sci. Technol. 26 113001Google Scholar

    [5]

    Bruggeman P J, Iza F, Brandenburg R 2017 Plasma Sources Sci. Technol. 26 123002Google Scholar

    [6]

    Zhang Y T, Chi Y Y, He J 2014 Plasma Process. Polym. 11 639Google Scholar

    [7]

    Wang X C, Bai J X, Zhang T H, Sun Y, Zhang Y T 2022 Vacuum 203 111200Google Scholar

    [8]

    张泰恒, 王绪成, 张远涛 2021 70 215201Google Scholar

    Zhang T H, Wang X C, Zhang Y T 2021 Acta Phys. Sin. 70 215201Google Scholar

    [9]

    Iqbal M M, Turner M M 2015 Plasma Process. Polym. 12 1104Google Scholar

    [10]

    Zhang Y T, Wang D Z, Kong M G 2005 J. Appl. Phys. 98 113308Google Scholar

    [11]

    Alves L, Bogaerts A, Guerra V, Turner M 2018 Plasma Sources Sci. Technol. 27 023002Google Scholar

    [12]

    Wang G, Kuang Y, Zhang Y T 2019 Plasma Sci. Technol. 22 015404Google Scholar

    [13]

    Brodtkorb A R, Hagen T R, Sætra M L 2013 J. Parallel Distrib. Comput. 73 4Google Scholar

    [14]

    Pandey M, Fernandez M, Gentile F, Isayev O, Tropsha A, Stern A C, Cherkasov A 2022 Nat. Mach. Intell. 4 211Google Scholar

    [15]

    Eklund A, Dufort P, Forsberg D, LaConte S M 2013 Med. Image Anal. 17 1073Google Scholar

    [16]

    Carleo G, Cirac I, Cranmer K, Daudet L, Schuld M, Tishby N, Vogt-Maranto L, Zdeborová L 2019 Rev. Mod. Phys. 91 045002Google Scholar

    [17]

    Piccione A, Berkery J, Sabbagh S, Andreopoulos Y 2020 Nucl. Fusion 60 046033Google Scholar

    [18]

    Fu Y, Eldon D, Erickson K, Kleijwegt K, Lupin-Jimenez L, Boyer M D, Eidietis N, Barbour N, Izacard O, Kolemen E 2020 Phys. Plasma 27 022501Google Scholar

    [19]

    Mesbah A, Graves D B 2019 J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. 52 30LT02Google Scholar

    [20]

    Jordan M I, Mitchell T M 2015 Science 349 255Google Scholar

    [21]

    Wang H, Lei Z, Zhang X, Zhou B, Peng J 2019 Energy Convers. Manage. 198 111799Google Scholar

    [22]

    Bonzanini A D, Shao K, Stancampiano A, Graves D B, Mesbah A 2021 IEEE Trans. Radiat. Plasma Med. Sci. 6 16Google Scholar

    [23]

    Hong Y, Hou B, Jiang H, Zhang J 2020 Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Comput. Mol. Sci. 10 e1450Google Scholar

    [24]

    Abiodun O I, Jantan A, Omolara A E, Dada K V, Mohamed N A, Arshad H 2018 Heliyon 4 e00938Google Scholar

    [25]

    Dongare A, Kharde R, Kachare A D 2012 IJEIT 2 189

    [26]

    Kukreja H, Bharath N, Siddesh C, Kuldeep S 2016 Int. J. Adv. Res. Innov. Ideas Educ. 1 27

    [27]

    Han J, Jentzen A, Weinan E 2018 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 115 8505Google Scholar

    [28]

    Zhong L, Gu Q, Wu B 2020 Comput. Phys. Commun. 257 107496Google Scholar

    [29]

    张远涛, 王德真, 王艳辉 2005 54 4808Google Scholar

    Zhang Y T, Wang D Z, Wang Y H 2005 Acta Phys. Sin. 54 4808Google Scholar

    [30]

    王艳辉, 王德真 2003 52 1694Google Scholar

    Wang Y H, Wang D Z 2003 Acta Phys. Sin. 52 1694Google Scholar

    [31]

    Massines F, Rabehi A, Decomps P, Gadri R B, Ségur P, Mayoux C 1998 J. Appl. Phys. 83 2950Google Scholar

    [32]

    Zhang Y T, Wang D Z, Kong M G 2006 J. Appl. Phys. 100 063304Google Scholar

    [33]

    He J, Zhang Y T 2012 Plasma Process. Polym. 9 919Google Scholar

    [34]

    Wang Y, Zhang Y, Wang D Z, Kong M G 2007 Appl. Phys. Lett. 90 071501Google Scholar

    [35]

    Yuan X, Raja L L 2003 IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci. 31 495Google Scholar

    [36]

    Song S, Guo Y, Choe W, Zhang J, Zhang J, Shi J 2012 Phys. Plasma 19 123508Google Scholar

    [37]

    Zhang Y T, Wang Y H 2018 Phys. Plasma 25 023509Google Scholar

    [38]

    Simeni M S, Zheng Y, Barnat E V, Bruggeman P J 2021 Plasma Sources Sci. Technol. 30 055004Google Scholar

    [39]

    王艳辉 2006 博士学位论文 (大连: 大连理工大学)

    Wang Y H 2006 Ph. D. Dissertation (Dalian: Dalian University of Technology) (in Chinese)

    [40]

    Vanraes P, Nikiforov A, Bogaerts A, Leys C 2018 Sci. Rep. 8 1Google Scholar

    [41]

    Massines F, Segur P, Gherardi N, Khamphan C, Ricard A 2003 Surf. Coat. Tech. 174 8Google Scholar

    [42]

    徐学基, 诸定昌 1996 气体放电物理 (上海: 复旦大学出版社) 第277页

    Xu X J, Zhu D C 1996 Discharge Physics of Gas (Shanghai: Fudan University Press) p277 (in Chinese)

    [43]

    刘勇, 何湘宁, 马飞 2005 高电压技术 31 55Google Scholar

    Liu Y, He X N, Ma F 2005 High Volt. Eng. 31 55Google Scholar

    [44]

    Sadeghi B 2000 J. Mater. Process. Technol. 103 411Google Scholar

    [45]

    Gawehn E, Hiss J A, Brown J B, Schneider G 2018 Expert Opin. Drug Discovery 13 579Google Scholar

    [46]

    He J, Hu J T, Liu D W, Zhang Y T 2013 Plasma Sources Sci. Technol. 22 035008Google Scholar

    [47]

    Golubovskii Y B, Maiorov V, Behnke J, Behnke J 2002 J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. 36 39Google Scholar

  • [1] Zhang Xu, Ding Jin-Min, Hou Chen-Yang, Zhao Yi-Ming, Liu Hong-Wei, Liang Sheng. Machine learning based laser homogenization method. Acta Physica Sinica, 2024, 73(16): 164205. doi: 10.7498/aps.73.20240747
    [2] Zhang Jia-Hui. Machine learning for in silico protein research. Acta Physica Sinica, 2024, 73(6): 069301. doi: 10.7498/aps.73.20231618
    [3] Tang Tian-Yi, Xiong Yi-Ming, Zhang Rui-Ge, Zhang Jian, Li Wen-Fei, Wang Jun, Wang Wei. Progress in protein pre-training models integrating structural knowledge. Acta Physica Sinica, 2024, 73(18): 188701. doi: 10.7498/aps.73.20240811
    [4] Zhang Dong-He-Yu, Liu Jin-Bao, Fu Yang-Yang. Multiphysics modeling and simulations of laser-sustained plasmas. Acta Physica Sinica, 2024, 73(2): 025201. doi: 10.7498/aps.73.20231056
    [5] Liu Ye, Niu He-Ran, Li Bing-Bing, Ma Xin-Hua, Cui Shu-Wang. Application of machine learning in cosmic ray particle identification. Acta Physica Sinica, 2023, 72(14): 140202. doi: 10.7498/aps.72.20230334
    [6] Guan Xing-Yue, Huang Heng-Yan, Peng Hua-Qi, Liu Yan-Hang, Li Wen-Fei, Wang Wei. Machine learning in molecular simulations of biomolecules. Acta Physica Sinica, 2023, 72(24): 248708. doi: 10.7498/aps.72.20231624
    [7] Luo Fang-Fang, Cai Zhi-Tao, Huang Yan-Dong. Progress in protein pKa prediction. Acta Physica Sinica, 2023, 72(24): 248704. doi: 10.7498/aps.72.20231356
    [8] Zhang Yi-Fan, Ren Wei, Wang Wei-Li, Ding Shu-Jian, Li Nan, Chang Liang, Zhou Qian. Machine learning combined with solid solution strengthening model for predicting hardness of high entropy alloys. Acta Physica Sinica, 2023, 72(18): 180701. doi: 10.7498/aps.72.20230646
    [9] Qi Bing, Tian Xiao, Wang Jing, Wang Yi-Shan, Si Jin-Hai, Tang Jie. One-dimensional simulation of Ar dielectric barrier discharge driven by combined rf/dc sources at atmospheric pressure. Acta Physica Sinica, 2022, 71(24): 245202. doi: 10.7498/aps.71.20221361
    [10] Chen Jiang-Zhi, Yang Chen-Wen, Ren Jie. Machine learning based on wave and diffusion physical systems. Acta Physica Sinica, 2021, 70(14): 144204. doi: 10.7498/aps.70.20210879
    [11] Wu Jian, Han Wen, Cheng Zhen-Zhen, Yang Bin, Sun Li-Li, Wang Di, Zhu Cheng-Peng, Zhang Yong, Geng Ming-Xin, Jing Yan. Structure optimization of carbon nanotube ionization sensor based on fluid model. Acta Physica Sinica, 2021, 70(9): 090701. doi: 10.7498/aps.70.20201828
    [12] Li De-Mei, Lai Hui-Lin, Xu Ai-Guo, Zhang Guang-Cai, Lin Chuan-Dong, Gan Yan-Biao. Discrete Boltzmann simulation of Rayleigh-Taylor instability in compressible flows. Acta Physica Sinica, 2018, 67(8): 080501. doi: 10.7498/aps.67.20171952
    [13] Yao Cong-Wei, Ma Heng-Chi, Chang Zheng-Shi, Li Ping, Mu Hai-Bao, Zhang Guan-Jun. Simulations of the cathode falling characteristics and its influence factors in atmospheric pressure dielectric barrier glow discharge pulse. Acta Physica Sinica, 2017, 66(2): 025203. doi: 10.7498/aps.66.025203
    [14] Dong Ye, Dong Zhi-Wei, Zhou Qian-Hong, Yang Wen-Yuan, Zhou Hai-Jing. Ionization parameters of high power microwave flashover on dielectric window surface calculated by particle-in-cell simulation for fluid modeling. Acta Physica Sinica, 2014, 63(6): 067901. doi: 10.7498/aps.63.067901
    [15] Zhao Peng-Cheng, Liao Cheng, Yang Dang, Zhong Xuan-Ming, Lin Wen-Bin. High power microwave breakdown in gas using the fluid model with non-equilibrium electron energy distribution function. Acta Physica Sinica, 2013, 62(5): 055101. doi: 10.7498/aps.62.055101
    [16] Zhang Zeng-Hui, Shao Xian-Jun, Zhang Guan-Jun, Li Ya-Xi, Peng Zhao-Yu. One-dimensional simulation of dielectric barrier glow discharge in atmospheric pressure Ar. Acta Physica Sinica, 2012, 61(4): 045205. doi: 10.7498/aps.61.045205
    [17] Zhang Zeng-Hui, Zhang Guan-Jun, Shao Xian-Jun, Chang Zheng-Shi, Peng Zhao-Yu, Xu Hao. Modelling study of dielectric barrier glow discharge in Ar/NH3 mixture at atmospheric pressure. Acta Physica Sinica, 2012, 61(24): 245205. doi: 10.7498/aps.61.245205
    [18] Xia Guang-Qing, Xue Wei-Hua, Chen Mao-Lin, Zhu Yu, Zhu Guo-Qiang. Numerical simulation study on characteristic parameters of microcavity discharge in argon. Acta Physica Sinica, 2011, 60(1): 015201. doi: 10.7498/aps.60.015201
    [19] Shao Xian-Jun, Ma Yue, Li Ya-Xi, Zhang Guan-Jun. One-dimensional simulation of low pressure xenon dielectric barrier discharge. Acta Physica Sinica, 2010, 59(12): 8747-8754. doi: 10.7498/aps.59.8747
    [20] Zhou Li-Na, Wang Xin-Bing. A fluid model for the simulation of discharges in microhollow cathode. Acta Physica Sinica, 2004, 53(10): 3440-3446. doi: 10.7498/aps.53.3440
Metrics
  • Abstract views:  4085
  • PDF Downloads:  88
  • Cited By: 0
Publishing process
  • Received Date:  01 August 2022
  • Accepted Date:  15 September 2022
  • Available Online:  06 December 2022
  • Published Online:  24 December 2022

/

返回文章
返回
Baidu
map