-
Liquid droplet is a prerequisite for micro-robot based on liquid medium. The investigation of the migration characteristics of condensed droplets on the end surface of a single-finger microgripper is of significance for obtaining stable droplets. The principle of flexible operation for micro-components using droplet condensation is analyzed first. The liquid bridge force acting on a microsphere is derived. A growth model of condensed droplet on the tip of a single-finger microgripper is established, including single-droplet growth, droplet coalesce, droplet movement, and pining effect. Condensation process on the tip of single-finger microgripper with a diameter of 130-400 μm is observed experimentally. Small droplets are formed by directly growing with a big growth rate in the initial stage, then the droplet growth is determined by droplet coalesce. The experimental results show that a single droplet is formed on the end surface after direct growth and droplets coalesce. The maximum droplet volume of 5.5 nL appears on the tip of a single-finger actuator with a diameter of 400 μm under the conditions of surface temperature of –5 °C, room temperature of 24 °C and humidity of 37%. The stability of the formed droplets is dominated by temperature gradients and edge effects during growth process. The distribution of condensed droplets is asymmetric while the microgripper is placed on a cooling surface with temperature gradient. A big growth rate is shown in a low temperature range. A single asymmetric droplet with an offset of 13 μm with respect to the axis of the actuator is formed, which is caused by the temperature gradient. A stable contact angle of 112° is obtained on the end surface of a single-finger microgripper with a diameter of 137 μm because of edge effect using the ambient temperature of 24 °C and humidity of 42%. Condensed droplets located on the end surface of hydrophobic microgripper are more stable than the untreated microgripper. Compared with the droplet formation (0.3 nL) on an untreated microgripper with a diameter of 150 μm, a lager stable droplet of 0.4 nL is obtained on the end face of a small microgripper with a diameter of 130 μm because of the hydrophobic action. The validity of theoretical analysis is verified by experimental results. The experimental investigation of the migration characteristics of condensed droplets on the end surface of a single-finger microgripper shows that the droplet shape can be changed by adjusting the temperature gradient and hydrophilic/hydrophobic performance, which plays an important role in achieving a stable droplet on the end surface.
-
Keywords:
- droplet /
- migration characteristics /
- condensation /
- single-finger microgripper
[1] Yao T, Chisholm N G, Steager E B, Stebe K J 2020 Appl. Phys. Lett. 116 043702Google Scholar
[2] Wang K, Gu Z, Liu S, Li J, Xiao S, Song Q 2016 Opt. Lett. 41 555Google Scholar
[3] Vasudev A, Zhe J 2008 Appl. Phys. Lett. 93 103503Google Scholar
[4] Fantoni G, Hansen H N, Santochi M 2013 CIRP Ann. Manuf. Technol. 62 17Google Scholar
[5] Bhushan B, Ling X 2009 J. Colloid Interface Sci. 329 196Google Scholar
[6] Wang L F, Chu Z Q, Fan Z H, Rong, W B 2014 Adv. Mater. Res. 971 915Google Scholar
[7] Fuchiwaki O, Kumagai K 2013 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems Tokyo, Japan, November 3−7, 2013 p1003
[8] Obata K J, Motokado T, Saito S, Takahashi K 2004 J. Fluid Mech. 498 113Google Scholar
[9] Chang B, Zhu Z, Koverola M, Zhou Q 2017 Micromachines 8 361Google Scholar
[10] Chang B, Shah A, Routa I, Lipsanen H, Zhou Q 2012 Appl. Phys. Lett. 101 114105Google Scholar
[11] Shah A, Chang B, Suihkonen S, Zhou Q, Lipsanen H 2013 J. Microelectromech. Syst. 22 739Google Scholar
[12] 张勤, 甘裕明, 黄维军, 青山尚之 2014 机器人 36 430Google Scholar
Zhang Q, Gan Y M, Huang W J, Aoyama H 2014 Robot 36 430Google Scholar
[13] Ji X, Zhou D, Dai C, Xu J 2019 Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer 132 52Google Scholar
[14] 兰忠, 朱霞, 彭本利, 林勐, 马学虎 2012 61 150508Google Scholar
Lan Z, Zhu X, Peng B L, Lin M, Ma X H 2012 Acta Phys. Sin. 61 150508Google Scholar
[15] 刘天庆, 孙玮, 李香琴, 孙相彧, 艾宏儒 2014 63 086801Google Scholar
Liu T Q, Sun W, Li X Q, Sun X Y, Ai H R 2014 Acta Phys. Sin. 63 086801Google Scholar
[16] 吴兵兵, 吴化平, 张征, 董晨晨, 柴国钟 2015 64 176801Google Scholar
Wu B B, Wu H P, Zhang Z, Dong C C, Chai G Z 2015 Acta Phys. Sin. 64 176801Google Scholar
[17] 周建臣, 耿兴国, 林可君, 张永建, 臧渡洋 2014 63 216801Google Scholar
Zhou J C, Geng X G, Lin K J, Zhang Y J, Zang D Y 2014 Acta Phys. Sin. 63 216801Google Scholar
[18] Fan Z, Rong W, Tian Y, Wei X, Gao J 2019 Appl. Phys. Lett. 114 013703Google Scholar
[19] Wang L, Su F, Xu H, Rong W, Xie H 2016 Particuology 27 122Google Scholar
[20] Miljkovic N, Enright R, Wang E N 2013 J. Heat Transfer 135 111004Google Scholar
[21] Fan Z, Wang L, Rong W, Sun L 2015 Appl. Phys. Lett. 106 084105Google Scholar
-
图 7 冷凝进程 (a) 非对称初始生长; (b) 非对称偏移40 μm; (c) 非对称偏移13 μm; (d) 对称初始生长; (e) 对称双液滴; (f) 对称单液滴
Figure 7. Processes of droplet condensation: (a) Asymmetric growth in the initial stage; (b) 40 μm offset; (c) 13 μm offset; (d) symmetrical growth in the initial stage; (e) two symmetrical droplets; (f) one symmetrical droplet.
图 9 亲疏水端面冷凝 (a) 未处理端面冷凝; (b) 液滴侧移; (c) 表面微结构; (d) 疏水端面冷凝; (e) 稳定液滴
Figure 9. Droplet condensation on hydrophilic and hydrophobic surface: (a) Droplet condensation on the hydrophilic surface; (b) droplet sliding; (c) microstructures on hydrophobic surface; (d) and (e) a stable droplet is formed on the hydrophobic surface.
-
[1] Yao T, Chisholm N G, Steager E B, Stebe K J 2020 Appl. Phys. Lett. 116 043702Google Scholar
[2] Wang K, Gu Z, Liu S, Li J, Xiao S, Song Q 2016 Opt. Lett. 41 555Google Scholar
[3] Vasudev A, Zhe J 2008 Appl. Phys. Lett. 93 103503Google Scholar
[4] Fantoni G, Hansen H N, Santochi M 2013 CIRP Ann. Manuf. Technol. 62 17Google Scholar
[5] Bhushan B, Ling X 2009 J. Colloid Interface Sci. 329 196Google Scholar
[6] Wang L F, Chu Z Q, Fan Z H, Rong, W B 2014 Adv. Mater. Res. 971 915Google Scholar
[7] Fuchiwaki O, Kumagai K 2013 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems Tokyo, Japan, November 3−7, 2013 p1003
[8] Obata K J, Motokado T, Saito S, Takahashi K 2004 J. Fluid Mech. 498 113Google Scholar
[9] Chang B, Zhu Z, Koverola M, Zhou Q 2017 Micromachines 8 361Google Scholar
[10] Chang B, Shah A, Routa I, Lipsanen H, Zhou Q 2012 Appl. Phys. Lett. 101 114105Google Scholar
[11] Shah A, Chang B, Suihkonen S, Zhou Q, Lipsanen H 2013 J. Microelectromech. Syst. 22 739Google Scholar
[12] 张勤, 甘裕明, 黄维军, 青山尚之 2014 机器人 36 430Google Scholar
Zhang Q, Gan Y M, Huang W J, Aoyama H 2014 Robot 36 430Google Scholar
[13] Ji X, Zhou D, Dai C, Xu J 2019 Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer 132 52Google Scholar
[14] 兰忠, 朱霞, 彭本利, 林勐, 马学虎 2012 61 150508Google Scholar
Lan Z, Zhu X, Peng B L, Lin M, Ma X H 2012 Acta Phys. Sin. 61 150508Google Scholar
[15] 刘天庆, 孙玮, 李香琴, 孙相彧, 艾宏儒 2014 63 086801Google Scholar
Liu T Q, Sun W, Li X Q, Sun X Y, Ai H R 2014 Acta Phys. Sin. 63 086801Google Scholar
[16] 吴兵兵, 吴化平, 张征, 董晨晨, 柴国钟 2015 64 176801Google Scholar
Wu B B, Wu H P, Zhang Z, Dong C C, Chai G Z 2015 Acta Phys. Sin. 64 176801Google Scholar
[17] 周建臣, 耿兴国, 林可君, 张永建, 臧渡洋 2014 63 216801Google Scholar
Zhou J C, Geng X G, Lin K J, Zhang Y J, Zang D Y 2014 Acta Phys. Sin. 63 216801Google Scholar
[18] Fan Z, Rong W, Tian Y, Wei X, Gao J 2019 Appl. Phys. Lett. 114 013703Google Scholar
[19] Wang L, Su F, Xu H, Rong W, Xie H 2016 Particuology 27 122Google Scholar
[20] Miljkovic N, Enright R, Wang E N 2013 J. Heat Transfer 135 111004Google Scholar
[21] Fan Z, Wang L, Rong W, Sun L 2015 Appl. Phys. Lett. 106 084105Google Scholar
Catalog
Metrics
- Abstract views: 5957
- PDF Downloads: 68
- Cited By: 0