Thermoelectric properties of polycrystalline graphene nanoribbons

Xu Yi; Xu Xiao-Yan; Zhang Wei; Ouyang Tao; Tang Chao

doi:10.7498/aps.68.20191276

Abstract

Thermoelectric materials, which can convert heat energy into electric energy and also from electric energy into heat energy, have aroused widespread interest of both theoretical and technological researches recently. Graphene is a typical two-dimensional carbon nanomaterial and regarded as a competitive candidate for the next-generation micro/nano-devices. Unfortunately, graphene is an inefficient thermoelectric material due to the extremely high thermal conductivity. To overcome this drawback, exploring an effective way to improve the thermoelectric performance is of critical importance. In this paper, using the nonequilibrium Green’s function approach, we systematically investigate the effects of grain boundary on the thermoelectric properties of graphene nanoribbons. The results show that owing to the existence of grain boundary, the phonons and electrons encounter great scatterings when they transmit through the polycrystalline graphene nanoribbons. These scatterings cause the phononic and electronic transmission coefficient to decrease dramatically, and thus leading the thermal conductance (including both electron and phonon parts) of graphene nanoribbons to be evidently suppressed. Meanwhile, such scatterings induce more intense transmission peaks and pits in the electronic transmission spectrum of polycrystalline graphene nanoribbons. Generally, the Seebeck coefficient depends on the derivative of electronic transmission coefficient. The larger the logarithmic derivative of transmission, the higher the Seebeck coefficient can be obtained. Therefore Seebeck coefficient is improved obviously in the polycrystalline graphene nanoribbons. Based on such two positive effects, the thermoelectric performance of polycrystalline graphene nanoribbons is significantly enhanced. At room temperature, the thermoelectric figure of merit of polycrystalline graphene nanoribbons can approach to 0.3, which is about 6 times larger than that of pristine graphene nanoribbon (figure of merit is about 0.05). It is also found that the quantity of grain boundaries and length of system can further improve the thermoelectric properties of the polycrystalline graphene nanoribbons, while the width of system has a limited influence on it. This is because the quantity of grain boundaries and length of polycrystalline graphene nanoribbons can give rise to more intense phonon and electron scatterings and further decreasing of thermal conductance and enhancement of Seebeck coefficient. The results presented in this paper demonstrate that polycrystalline structure is indeed an effective way to improve the thermoelectric conversion efficiency of graphene nanoribbons, and provide a theoretical guideline for designing and preparing thermoelectric devices based on graphene nanoribbons.

Keywords:

Authors and contacts

1.
School of Physics and Optoelectronics, Xiangtan University, Xiangtan 411105, China
2.
Hunan Key Laboratory for Micro-Nano Energy Materials and Device, Xiangtan University, Xiangtan 411105, China

Corresponding author: Ouyang Tao, ouyangtao@xtu.edu.cn ; Tang Chao, tang_chao@xtu.edu.cn

Funds: Project supported by the Research Foundation of Education Bureau of Hunan Province, China (Grant No. 17B252)

FullText HTML : translate this paragraph

References

[1]	Tritt T M 2011 Annu. Rev. Mater. Res. 41 433 Google Scholar
[2]	Dresselhaus M S, Chen G, Tang M Y, Yang R G, Lee H, Wang D Z, Ren Z F, Fleurial J P, Gogna P 2007 Adv. Mater. 19 1043 Google Scholar
[3]	Snyder G J, Toberer E S 2008 Nat. Mater. 7 105 Google Scholar
[4]	Zhu L, Li R, Yao K 2017 Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 19 4085 Google Scholar
[5]	Zhu L, Li B, Yao K 2018 Nanotechnology 29 325206 Google Scholar
[6]	Zhu L, Zou F, Gao G Y, Yao K 2017 Sci. Rep. 7 497 Google Scholar
[7]	Geim A K, Novoselov K S 2007 Nat. Mater. 6 183 Google Scholar
[8]	Geim A K 2009 Science 324 1530 Google Scholar
[9]	Barone V, Hod O, Scuseria G E 2006 Nano Lett. 6 2748 Google Scholar
[10]	Lee C, Wei X, Kysar J W, Hone J 2008 Science 321 385 Google Scholar
[11]	Nan H Y, Ni Z H, Wang J, Zafar Z, Shi Z X, Wang Y Y 2013 J. Raman Spectrosc. 44 1018 Google Scholar
[12]	Zhang H J, Zheng G G, Chen Y Y, Zou X J, Xu L H 2018 Chin. Phys. Lett. 35 038102 Google Scholar
[13]	Bolotin K I, Sikes K J, Jiang Z, Klima M, Fudenberg G, Hone J, Kim P, Stormer H L 2008 Solid State Commun. 146 351 Google Scholar
[14]	Dragoman D, Dragoman M 2007 Appl. Phys. Lett. 91 203116 Google Scholar
[15]	Zhang H S, Guo Z X, Gong X G, Cao J X 2012 J. Appl. Phys. 112 123508 Google Scholar
[16]	Nika D L, Pokatilov E P, Askerov A S, Balandin A A 2009 Phys. Rev. B 79 155413 Google Scholar
[17]	Karamitaheri H, Pourfath M, Faez R, Kosina H 2011 J. Appl. Phys. 110 054506 Google Scholar
[18]	Haskins J, Kınacı A, Sevik C, Sevinçli H, Cuniberti G, Çagǧın T 2011 ACS Nano 5 3779 Google Scholar
[19]	张嵛, 刘连庆, 焦念东, 席宁, 王越超, 董再励 2012 61 137101 Google Scholar Zhang Y, Liu L Q, Jiao N D, Xi N, Wang Y C, Dong Z L 2012 Acta Phys. Sin. 61 137101 Google Scholar
[20]	Tran V T, Saint Martin J, Dollfus P, Volz S 2017 Sci. Rep. 7 2313 Google Scholar
[21]	林琦, 陈余行, 吴建宝, 孔宗敏 2011 60 097103 Lin Q, Chen Y H, Wu J B, Kong Z M 2011 Acta Phys. Sin. 60 097103
[22]	Huang P Y, Ruiz Vargas C S, van der Zande Arend M, Whitney W S, Levendorf M P, Kevek J W, Shivank G, Alden J S, Hustedt C J, Zhu Y, Park J W, McEuen P L, Muller D A 2011 Nature 469 389 Google Scholar
[23]	Li X S, Cai W W, An J, Kim S, Nah J, Yang D X, Piner R, Velamakanni A, Jung I, Tutuc E, Banerjee S K, Colombo L, Ruoff R S 2009 Science 324 1312 Google Scholar
[24]	Yazyev O V, Louie S G 2010 Nat. Mater. 9 806 Google Scholar
[25]	Lee G H, Cooper R C, An S J, Lee S, Zande A, Petrone N, Hammerberg A G, Lee C, Crawford B, Oliver W, Kysar J W, Hone J 2013 Science 340 1073 Google Scholar
[26]	Rassin G, Shenoy V B, Ruoff R S 2010 Science 330 946 Google Scholar
[27]	Bagri A, Kim S P, Ruoff R S, Shenoy V B 2011 Nano Lett. 11 3917 Google Scholar
[28]	Wang J S, Wang J, Lu J T 2008 Eur. Phys. J. B 62 381 Google Scholar
[29]	Yamamoto T, Watanabe K 2006 Phys. Rev. Lett. 96 255503 Google Scholar
[30]	Xiao H P, Cao W, Ouyang T, Xu X Y, Ding Y C, Zhong J X 2018 Appl. Phys. Lett. 112 233107 Google Scholar
[31]	Ghosh S, Calizo I, Teweldebrhan D, Pokatilov E P, Nika D L, Balandin A A, Bao W, Miao F, Lau C N 2008 Appl. Phys. Lett. 92 151911 Google Scholar
[32]	Li T C, Lu S P 2008 Phys. Rev. B 77 085408 Google Scholar
[33]	Pereira V M, Neto A H C, Peres N M R 2009 Phys. Rev. B 80 045401
[34]	Ouyang T, Hu M 2014 Nanotechnology 25 245401 Google Scholar

Cited By

图 1 多晶石墨烯纳米带原子结构模型示意图

Figure 1. Schematic diagram of polycrystalline graphene nanoribbons.

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

图 2 完美石墨烯纳米带和多晶石墨烯纳米带的(a)声子热导和(b)声子透射系数(其中L = 196.48 Å, W = 17.04Å); (c)−(e)多晶石墨烯纳米带(N = 5)在3个典型频率下(频率分别是160.68, 585.04, 951.72 Hz)的声子局域态密度

Figure 2. Comparison of (a) the phonon conductance, (b) the phonon transmission for perfect graphene nanoribbons and polycrystalline graphene nanoribbons (where L = 196.48 Å, W = 17.04 Å); (c)−(e) the local density of states in polycrystalline graphene (N = 5) at three typical frequency (160.68, 585.04 and 951.72 Hz).

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

图 3 完美石墨烯纳米带和多晶石墨烯纳米带的电子性质　(a)电子透射系数; (b)电子电导; (c)电子热导; (d)塞贝克系数

Figure 3. Electronic properties of perfect graphene and polycrystalline graphene: (a) The electronic transmission coefficient; (b) the electronic conductance; (c) the electronic contributed thermal conductance; (d) the Seebeck coefficient.

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

图 4 完美和多晶石墨烯纳米带的热电品质因子随温度的变化

Figure 4. Peak values of ZT as a function of temperature for perfect graphene nanoribbons and polycrystalline graphene nanoribbons.

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

图 5 室温下(300 K), 完美与多晶石墨烯纳米带(N = 5)热电品质因子随系统(a)长度L和(b)宽度W的变化(阴影部分为标准偏差)

Figure 5. Peak values of ZT of perfect and polycrystalline graphene nanoribbons (N = 5) at room temperature as a function of (a) nanoribbon length or (b) nanoribbon width. The shading part corresponds to the standard deviation.

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

map

[1]	Tritt T M 2011 Annu. Rev. Mater. Res. 41 433 Google Scholar
[2]	Dresselhaus M S, Chen G, Tang M Y, Yang R G, Lee H, Wang D Z, Ren Z F, Fleurial J P, Gogna P 2007 Adv. Mater. 19 1043 Google Scholar
[3]	Snyder G J, Toberer E S 2008 Nat. Mater. 7 105 Google Scholar
[4]	Zhu L, Li R, Yao K 2017 Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 19 4085 Google Scholar
[5]	Zhu L, Li B, Yao K 2018 Nanotechnology 29 325206 Google Scholar
[6]	Zhu L, Zou F, Gao G Y, Yao K 2017 Sci. Rep. 7 497 Google Scholar
[7]	Geim A K, Novoselov K S 2007 Nat. Mater. 6 183 Google Scholar
[8]	Geim A K 2009 Science 324 1530 Google Scholar
[9]	Barone V, Hod O, Scuseria G E 2006 Nano Lett. 6 2748 Google Scholar
[10]	Lee C, Wei X, Kysar J W, Hone J 2008 Science 321 385 Google Scholar
[11]	Nan H Y, Ni Z H, Wang J, Zafar Z, Shi Z X, Wang Y Y 2013 J. Raman Spectrosc. 44 1018 Google Scholar
[12]	Zhang H J, Zheng G G, Chen Y Y, Zou X J, Xu L H 2018 Chin. Phys. Lett. 35 038102 Google Scholar
[13]	Bolotin K I, Sikes K J, Jiang Z, Klima M, Fudenberg G, Hone J, Kim P, Stormer H L 2008 Solid State Commun. 146 351 Google Scholar
[14]	Dragoman D, Dragoman M 2007 Appl. Phys. Lett. 91 203116 Google Scholar
[15]	Zhang H S, Guo Z X, Gong X G, Cao J X 2012 J. Appl. Phys. 112 123508 Google Scholar
[16]	Nika D L, Pokatilov E P, Askerov A S, Balandin A A 2009 Phys. Rev. B 79 155413 Google Scholar
[17]	Karamitaheri H, Pourfath M, Faez R, Kosina H 2011 J. Appl. Phys. 110 054506 Google Scholar
[18]	Haskins J, Kınacı A, Sevik C, Sevinçli H, Cuniberti G, Çagǧın T 2011 ACS Nano 5 3779 Google Scholar
[19]	张嵛, 刘连庆, 焦念东, 席宁, 王越超, 董再励 2012 61 137101 Google Scholar Zhang Y, Liu L Q, Jiao N D, Xi N, Wang Y C, Dong Z L 2012 Acta Phys. Sin. 61 137101 Google Scholar
[20]	Tran V T, Saint Martin J, Dollfus P, Volz S 2017 Sci. Rep. 7 2313 Google Scholar
[21]	林琦, 陈余行, 吴建宝, 孔宗敏 2011 60 097103 Lin Q, Chen Y H, Wu J B, Kong Z M 2011 Acta Phys. Sin. 60 097103
[22]	Huang P Y, Ruiz Vargas C S, van der Zande Arend M, Whitney W S, Levendorf M P, Kevek J W, Shivank G, Alden J S, Hustedt C J, Zhu Y, Park J W, McEuen P L, Muller D A 2011 Nature 469 389 Google Scholar
[23]	Li X S, Cai W W, An J, Kim S, Nah J, Yang D X, Piner R, Velamakanni A, Jung I, Tutuc E, Banerjee S K, Colombo L, Ruoff R S 2009 Science 324 1312 Google Scholar
[24]	Yazyev O V, Louie S G 2010 Nat. Mater. 9 806 Google Scholar
[25]	Lee G H, Cooper R C, An S J, Lee S, Zande A, Petrone N, Hammerberg A G, Lee C, Crawford B, Oliver W, Kysar J W, Hone J 2013 Science 340 1073 Google Scholar
[26]	Rassin G, Shenoy V B, Ruoff R S 2010 Science 330 946 Google Scholar
[27]	Bagri A, Kim S P, Ruoff R S, Shenoy V B 2011 Nano Lett. 11 3917 Google Scholar
[28]	Wang J S, Wang J, Lu J T 2008 Eur. Phys. J. B 62 381 Google Scholar
[29]	Yamamoto T, Watanabe K 2006 Phys. Rev. Lett. 96 255503 Google Scholar
[30]	Xiao H P, Cao W, Ouyang T, Xu X Y, Ding Y C, Zhong J X 2018 Appl. Phys. Lett. 112 233107 Google Scholar
[31]	Ghosh S, Calizo I, Teweldebrhan D, Pokatilov E P, Nika D L, Balandin A A, Bao W, Miao F, Lau C N 2008 Appl. Phys. Lett. 92 151911 Google Scholar
[32]	Li T C, Lu S P 2008 Phys. Rev. B 77 085408 Google Scholar
[33]	Pereira V M, Neto A H C, Peres N M R 2009 Phys. Rev. B 80 045401
[34]	Ouyang T, Hu M 2014 Nanotechnology 25 245401 Google Scholar

[1]	Xing Hai-Ying, Zhang Zi-Han, Wu Wen-Jing, Guo Zhi-Ying, Ru Jin-Dou. Regulation and mechanism of graphene electrode bending on negative differential resistance of 2-phenylpyridine molecular devices. Acta Physica Sinica, 2023, 72(3): 038502. doi: 10.7498/aps.72.20221212
[2]	Wu Jing, Cui Chun-Feng, Ou-Yang Tao, Tang Chao. Optimal design of thermoelectric properties of graphene nanoribbons with 5-7 ring defects based on Bayesian algorithm. Acta Physica Sinica, 2023, 72(4): 047201. doi: 10.7498/aps.72.20222135
[3]	Wu Cheng-Wei, Ren Xue, Zhou Wu-Xing, Xie Guo-Feng. Theoretical study of anisotropy and ultra-low thermal conductance of porous graphene nanoribbons. Acta Physica Sinica, 2022, 71(2): 027803. doi: 10.7498/aps.71.20211477
[4]	. Crystal Structure Engineering as a Means of Boosting the Thermoelectric Performance of GeSe. Acta Physica Sinica, 2021, (): . doi: 10.7498/aps.70.20211843
[5]	Wei Jiang-Tao, Yang Liang-Liang, Wei Lei, Qin Yuan-Hao, Song Pei-Shuai, Zhang Ming-Liang, Yang Fu-Hua, Wang Xiao-Dong. Fabrication and thermoelectric properties of Si micro/nanobelts. Acta Physica Sinica, 2021, 70(18): 187304. doi: 10.7498/aps.70.20210801
[6]	. Theoretical Study on Anisotropy and Ultra-low Thermal Conductance of Porous Graphene nanoribbons. Acta Physica Sinica, 2021, (): . doi: 10.7498/aps.70.20211477
[7]	Cui Yan, Xia Cai-Juan, Su Yao-Heng, Zhang Bo-Qun, Zhang Ting-Ting, Liu Yang, Hu Zhen-Yang, Tang Xiao-Jie. Switching characteristics of anthraquinone molecular devices based on graphene electrodes. Acta Physica Sinica, 2021, 70(3): 038501. doi: 10.7498/aps.70.20201095
[8]	He Yan-Bin, Bai Xi. Electron transport of one-dimensional non-conjugated (CH₂)_n molecule chain coupling to graphene electrode. Acta Physica Sinica, 2021, 70(4): 046201. doi: 10.7498/aps.70.20200953
[9]	Liang Jin-Tao, Yan Xiao-Hong, Zhang Ying, Xiao Yang. Non-collinear magnetism and electronic transport of boron or nitrogen doped zigzag graphene nanoribbon. Acta Physica Sinica, 2019, 68(2): 027101. doi: 10.7498/aps.68.20181754
[10]	Cui Yan, Xia Cai-Juan, Su Yao-Heng, Zhang Bo-Qun, Chen Ai-Min, Yang Ai-Yun, Zhang Ting-Ting, Liu Yang. Rectifying performances of oligo phenylene ethynylene molecular devices based on graphene electrodes. Acta Physica Sinica, 2018, 67(11): 118501. doi: 10.7498/aps.67.20180088
[11]	Zhou Xin, Gao Ren-Bin, Tan Shi-Hua, Peng Xiao-Fang, Jiang Xiang-Tao, Bao Ben-Gang. Influence of multi-cavity dislocation distribution on thermal conductance in graphene nanoribbons. Acta Physica Sinica, 2017, 66(12): 126302. doi: 10.7498/aps.66.126302
[12]	Zu Feng-Xia, Zhang Pan-Pan, Xiong Lun, Yin Yong, Liu Min-Min, Gao Guo-Ying. Design and electronic transport properties of organic thiophene molecular rectifier with the graphene electrodes. Acta Physica Sinica, 2017, 66(9): 098501. doi: 10.7498/aps.66.098501
[13]	Qing Qian-Jun, Zhou Xin, Xie Fang, Chen Li-Qun, Wang Xin-Jun, Tan Shi-Hua, Peng Xiao-Fang. Characteristics of acoustic phonon transport and thermal conductance in multi-terminal graphene junctions. Acta Physica Sinica, 2016, 65(8): 086301. doi: 10.7498/aps.65.086301
[14]	He Xin, Bai Qing-Shun, Bai Jin-Xuan. Molecular dynamics study of the tensile mechanical properties of polycrystalline graphene. Acta Physica Sinica, 2016, 65(11): 116101. doi: 10.7498/aps.65.116101
[15]	Chen Xiao-Bin, Duan Wen-Hui. Quantum thermal transport and spin thermoelectrics in low-dimensional nano systems: application of nonequilibrium Green's function method. Acta Physica Sinica, 2015, 64(18): 186302. doi: 10.7498/aps.64.186302
[16]	An Xing-Tao, Diao Shu-Meng. Transport properties in a gate controlled silicene quantum wire. Acta Physica Sinica, 2014, 63(18): 187304. doi: 10.7498/aps.63.187304
[17]	Sun Zheng, Chen Shao-Ping, Yang Jiang-Feng, Meng Qing-Sen, Cui Jiao-Lin. Thermoelectric properties of chalcopyrite Cu3Ga5Te9 with Sb non-isoelectronic substitution for Cu and Te. Acta Physica Sinica, 2014, 63(5): 057201. doi: 10.7498/aps.63.057201
[18]	Tang Xin-Feng, Du Bao-Li, Xu Jing-Jing, Yan Yong-Gao. Synthesis and thermoelectric properties of nonstoichiometric AgSbTe2+ x compounds. Acta Physica Sinica, 2011, 60(1): 018403. doi: 10.7498/aps.60.018403
[19]	Zheng Xiao-Hong, Dai Zhen-Xiang, Wang Xian-Long, Zeng Zhi. Effects of B and N doping on spin polarized transport in graphene nanoribbons. Acta Physica Sinica, 2009, 58(13): 259-S265. doi: 10.7498/aps.58.259
[20]	Jiang Jun, Li Ya-Li, Xu Gao-Jie, Cui Ping, Wu Ting, Chen Li-Dong, Wang Gang. Effect of preparation methods on thermoelectric properties of p-type Bi2Te3-based materials. Acta Physica Sinica, 2007, 56(5): 2858-2862. doi: 10.7498/aps.56.2858

Catalog

Vol. 68, Issue 24 - 2019-12-20

Metrics

Abstract views: 7905
PDF Downloads: 156
Cited By: 0

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

Search

Article

留言板