-
The ability to undercool and solidification mechanism of liquid quinary Ni40Zr28.5Ti16.5Al10Cu5 alloy are investigated by electromagnetic levitation (EML) and drop tube (DT) technique. Under the EML condition, the maximum undercooling of levitated alloy can reach up to 290 K (0.21TL). Under the DT condition, the alloy achieves higher undercooling than EML, and solidifies finally into metallic glass. At lower undercooling, the solidification structure of the alloy is composed of primary Ni3Ti phase, secondary Ni10Zr7 phase and eutectic (Ni10Zr7+Ni21Zr8) phase. With the rise of undercooling, the solidification structure displays the following evolution events: phase morphology refinement, primary phase inhibition, phase number reduction, and amorphous phase formation. By using the high-speed cinematography technique, three nucleation modes are distinctly observed on the levitated alloy melt surface at the beginning of solidification, that is, single-point nucleation, multi-point nucleation and annular nucleation. The levitation state corresponding to single-point mode nucleation is relatively stable, and the alloy undercooling is also relatively low. The annular nucleation only occursin the case with high rotation speed, and the undercooling is greater than 208 K. The discrepancy between nucleation modes is due to the He gas flow for forced cooling. The theoretical calculations indicate that the alloy droplets achieve high undercoolingand large cooling rate under the DT condition. The experimental results show that when the droplet diameter decreases to 498 μm, the amorphous phase begins to appear in the alloy particles. It is noteworthy that the amorphous phase is preferentially formed inside the droplet, but not on the outer surface. The morphology of solidification structure reveals that different regions of the droplet have various local undercoolings, which result in the distribution characteristics of amorphous phase. The volume fraction of amorphous phase increases linearly with the decrease of particle diameter. When the droplet diameter decreases to 275 μm, the alloy droplets are completely frozen into glassy particles. The average eutecticspacing values are also measured at different alloy undercoolings. Compared with the classical binary eutectic growth model, the experimental eutectic growth law exhibits a large deviation in index. This indicates that the eutectic growth in multicomponent alloys displays more complex kinetic characteristics. -
Keywords:
- electromagnetic levitation /
- drop tube /
- undercooling /
- rapid solidification
[1] Zhao P, Heinrich J C, Poirier D R 2005 Int. J. Numer. Meth. Fluids 49 233
Google Scholar
[2] Sánchez Lamazares J L, Sanchez T, Santos J D, Pérez M J, Sanchez M L, Hernando B 2008 Appl. Phys. Lett. 92 4358
[3] Wu M, Liu T, Dong M, Sun J M, Dong S L, Qiang W 2017 J. Appl. Phys. 121 064901
Google Scholar
[4] Lü P, Wang H P 2017 Scr. Mater. 137 31
Google Scholar
[5] Chen F, Zhang T Q, Wang J, Zhang L T, Zhou G F 2015 J. Alloy. Compd. 640 375
[6] 翟秋亚, 杨扬, 徐锦锋, 郭学锋 2007 56 6118
Google Scholar
Zhai Q Y, Yang Y, Xu J F, Guo X F 2007 Acta Phys. Sin. 56 6118
Google Scholar
[7] Haein C Y, Xu D H, William L J 2003 Appl. Phys. Lett. 82 1030
Google Scholar
[8] Duwez P, Willens R H, Klement J W 1960 J. Appl. Phys. 31 1137
[9] 沙莎, 王伟丽, 吴宇昊, 魏炳波 2018 67 046402
Google Scholar
Sha S, Wang W L, Wu Y H, Wei B 2018 Acta Phys. Sin. 67 046402
Google Scholar
[10] Greaves G N, Wilding M C, Fearn S, Langstaff D, Kargl F, Cox S, Vu Van Q, Majérus O, Benmore C J, Weber R, Martin C M, Hennet L 2008 Science 322 566
Google Scholar
[11] Kavouras A, Krammer G 2003 Rev. Sci. Instrum. 74 4468
Google Scholar
[12] Baer S, Andrade M A, Esen C, Adamowski J C, Schweiger G, Ostendorf A 2011 Rev. Sci. Instrum. 82 105111
Google Scholar
[13] Wall J J, Weber R, Kim J, Liaw P K, Choo H 2007 Mater. Sci. Eng. A 445 219
[14] Skinner L B, Benmore C J, Weber J K R, Du J, Neuefeind J, Tumber S K, Parise1 J B 2014 Phys. Rev. Lett. 112 157801
Google Scholar
[15] Lan S, Blodgett M, Kelton K F, Ma J L, Fan J, Wang X L 2016 Appl. Phys. Lett. 108 831
[16] 杨尚京, 王伟丽, 魏炳波 2015 64 056401
Google Scholar
Yang S J, Wang W L, Wei B 2015 Acta Phys. Sin. 64 056401
Google Scholar
[17] Royer Z L, Tackes C, Lesar R, Napolitano R E 2013 J. Appl. Phys. 113 214901
Google Scholar
[18] Lee J, Rodriguez J E, Hyers R W, Matson D M 2015 Metall. Mater. Trans. B 46 2470
Google Scholar
[19] Cao L, Cochrane R F, Mullis A M 2015 Intermetallics 60 33
Google Scholar
[20] Xu D, Duan G, Johnson W L, Garland C 2004 Acta Mater. 52 3493
Google Scholar
[21] Lee E S, Ahn S 1994 Acta Metall. Mater. 42 3231
Google Scholar
[22] Wang W L, Li Z Q, Wei B 2011 Acta Mater. 59 5482
Google Scholar
[23] Alford T L, Gale W F, Totemeir T C 2015 Smithells Metals Reference Book (Elsevier) 8−2
[24] Inoue A 2000 Acta Mater. 48 279
Google Scholar
[25] Jackson K A, Hunt J D 1988 Dyna. Curv. Front. 236363
[26] Kurz W, Trivedi R 1991 Metall. Trans. A 22 3051
Google Scholar
-
图 1 五元Ni40Zr28.5Ti16.5Al10Cu5合金的相组成和相变特征 (a) X射线衍射图谱; (b) DSC热分析曲线; (c) 电磁悬浮状态下的冷却曲线
Figure 1. Phase constitution and transition characteristics of quinary Ni40Zr28.5Ti16.5Al10Cu5 alloy: (a) XRD pattern; (b) DSC thermogram; (c) cooling curve at levitated state.
图 2 初生 Ni3Ti相快速生长引起的再辉过程(a) 单点形核; (b) 多点形核; (c) 环区形核
Figure 2. Recalescence process caused by rapid growth of primary Ni3Ti phase(a) Single-point nucleation; (b) multi-point nucleation; (c) annular region nucleation.
图 3 悬浮状态下合金液滴的旋转速率与过冷度关系
Figure 3. Rotation rateversus undercooling of levitated alloy droplet
图 4 初生Ni3Ti相枝晶生长与组织特征 (a) 枝晶生长速度; (b) 最大尺寸和体积分数
Figure 4. Dendritic growth and microstructure of primary Ni3Ti phase: (a) Dendritic growth velocity; (b) maximum length and volume fraction.
图 5 电磁悬浮条件下Ni40Zr28.5Ti16.5Al10Cu5合金的微观组织形态 (a)母合金; (b) ΔT=115 K; (c) ΔT=200 K; (d) ΔT=290 K
Figure 5. Solidification microstructures of electromagnetically levitated Ni40Zr28.5Ti16.5Al10Cu5 alloy. (a) Master alloy; (b) ΔT=115 K; (c) ΔT=200 K; (d) ΔT=290 K.
图 6 合金液滴深过冷与共晶生长特征 (a)过冷度随液滴直径变化; (b) 共晶间距随过冷度变化
Figure 6. Liquid undercooling and eutectic growth of alloy droplets: (a) Estimated undercoolings of freely falling alloy droplets; (b) average eutectic spacing versus undercooling.
图 7 合金液滴内部温度场随直径和位置的变化关系 (a) 温度分布; (b) 温度梯度; (c) 冷却速率
Figure 7. Internal temperature field of alloy droplet versus diameter and location (a) Temperature distribution; (b) temperature gradient; (c) cooling rate.
图 8 自由落体条件下不同直径合金液滴的凝固组织形貌 (a) 957 μm直径; (b) A区放大; (c) B区放大(d) 428 μm直径; (e) C区放大; (f) D区放大
Figure 8. Microstructural morphology of solidified alloy droplets with different diameters.(a) 957 μm diameter; (b) Enlarged A in (a); (c) Enlarged B in (a)(d) 428 μm diameter; (b) Enlarged C in (d); (c) Enlarged D in (d)
图 9 合金液滴凝固组织中非晶相分布规律
Figure 9. Amorphous phase distribution versus alloy droplet diameter
图 10 合金凝固组织特征随液滴直径变化规律 (a) 非晶相体积分数; (b) 共晶相平均间距
Figure 10. Variation of solidification microstructures with alloy droplets diameter: (a) Typical structure parameters; (b) average eutectic spacing.
-
[1] Zhao P, Heinrich J C, Poirier D R 2005 Int. J. Numer. Meth. Fluids 49 233
Google Scholar
[2] Sánchez Lamazares J L, Sanchez T, Santos J D, Pérez M J, Sanchez M L, Hernando B 2008 Appl. Phys. Lett. 92 4358
[3] Wu M, Liu T, Dong M, Sun J M, Dong S L, Qiang W 2017 J. Appl. Phys. 121 064901
Google Scholar
[4] Lü P, Wang H P 2017 Scr. Mater. 137 31
Google Scholar
[5] Chen F, Zhang T Q, Wang J, Zhang L T, Zhou G F 2015 J. Alloy. Compd. 640 375
[6] 翟秋亚, 杨扬, 徐锦锋, 郭学锋 2007 56 6118
Google Scholar
Zhai Q Y, Yang Y, Xu J F, Guo X F 2007 Acta Phys. Sin. 56 6118
Google Scholar
[7] Haein C Y, Xu D H, William L J 2003 Appl. Phys. Lett. 82 1030
Google Scholar
[8] Duwez P, Willens R H, Klement J W 1960 J. Appl. Phys. 31 1137
[9] 沙莎, 王伟丽, 吴宇昊, 魏炳波 2018 67 046402
Google Scholar
Sha S, Wang W L, Wu Y H, Wei B 2018 Acta Phys. Sin. 67 046402
Google Scholar
[10] Greaves G N, Wilding M C, Fearn S, Langstaff D, Kargl F, Cox S, Vu Van Q, Majérus O, Benmore C J, Weber R, Martin C M, Hennet L 2008 Science 322 566
Google Scholar
[11] Kavouras A, Krammer G 2003 Rev. Sci. Instrum. 74 4468
Google Scholar
[12] Baer S, Andrade M A, Esen C, Adamowski J C, Schweiger G, Ostendorf A 2011 Rev. Sci. Instrum. 82 105111
Google Scholar
[13] Wall J J, Weber R, Kim J, Liaw P K, Choo H 2007 Mater. Sci. Eng. A 445 219
[14] Skinner L B, Benmore C J, Weber J K R, Du J, Neuefeind J, Tumber S K, Parise1 J B 2014 Phys. Rev. Lett. 112 157801
Google Scholar
[15] Lan S, Blodgett M, Kelton K F, Ma J L, Fan J, Wang X L 2016 Appl. Phys. Lett. 108 831
[16] 杨尚京, 王伟丽, 魏炳波 2015 64 056401
Google Scholar
Yang S J, Wang W L, Wei B 2015 Acta Phys. Sin. 64 056401
Google Scholar
[17] Royer Z L, Tackes C, Lesar R, Napolitano R E 2013 J. Appl. Phys. 113 214901
Google Scholar
[18] Lee J, Rodriguez J E, Hyers R W, Matson D M 2015 Metall. Mater. Trans. B 46 2470
Google Scholar
[19] Cao L, Cochrane R F, Mullis A M 2015 Intermetallics 60 33
Google Scholar
[20] Xu D, Duan G, Johnson W L, Garland C 2004 Acta Mater. 52 3493
Google Scholar
[21] Lee E S, Ahn S 1994 Acta Metall. Mater. 42 3231
Google Scholar
[22] Wang W L, Li Z Q, Wei B 2011 Acta Mater. 59 5482
Google Scholar
[23] Alford T L, Gale W F, Totemeir T C 2015 Smithells Metals Reference Book (Elsevier) 8−2
[24] Inoue A 2000 Acta Mater. 48 279
Google Scholar
[25] Jackson K A, Hunt J D 1988 Dyna. Curv. Front. 236363
[26] Kurz W, Trivedi R 1991 Metall. Trans. A 22 3051
Google Scholar
DownLoad:
Catalog
Metrics
- Abstract views: 9204
- PDF Downloads: 110
- Cited By: 0
