Search

Article

x

留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

Effect of amorphous carbon film on secondary electron emission of metal

Hu Xiao-Chuan Liu Yang-Xi Chu Kun Duan Chao-Feng

Citation:

Effect of amorphous carbon film on secondary electron emission of metal

Hu Xiao-Chuan, Liu Yang-Xi, Chu Kun, Duan Chao-Feng
PDF
HTML
Get Citation
  • Amorphous carbon films have attracted much attention in the field of abnormal discharge of vacuum microwave devices and equipment due to their extremely low secondary electron yields (SEYs). However, the dynamic process and microscopic mechanism of the effect of amorphous carbon film on secondary electron emission are still poorly understood. In this work, a numerical simulation model of the secondary electron emission of amorphous carbon film on copper surface is developed by the Monte Carlo method, which can accurately simulate the dynamic processes of electron scattering and emission of the film and the substrate. The results show that the maximum SEY decreases by about 20% when the film thickness increases from 0 to 1.5 nm. Further increasing the thickness, the SEY no longer decreases. However, when the film is thicker than 0.9 nm, the SEY curve exhibits a double-hump form, but with the thickness increasing to 3 nm, the second peak gradually weakens or even disappears. The electron scattering trajectories and energy distribution of secondary electrons indicate that this double-hump phenomenon is caused by electron scattering in two different materials. Compared with previous models, the proposed model takes into account the change of work function and the effect of interfacial barrier on electron scattering path. Our model can explain the formation of the double-hump of SEY curve and provides theoretical predictions for suppressing the SEY by amorphous carbon film.
      Corresponding author: Hu Xiao-Chuan, huxc@chd.edu.cn
    • Funds: Project supported by the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (Grant No. 2021M702629), the Natural Science Basic Research Plan in Shaanxi Province of China (Grant No. 2023-JC-YB-004), and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities of China (Grant Nos. 300102383103, 300102383203).
    [1]

    Kirby R E, King F K 2001 Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. , Sect. A 469 1Google Scholar

    [2]

    Yater J E 2023 J. Appl. Phys. 133 050901Google Scholar

    [3]

    李鹏飞, 袁华, 程紫东, 钱立冰, 刘中林, 靳博, 哈帅, 万城亮, 崔莹, 马越, 杨治虎, 路迪, Reinhold Schuch, 黎明, 张红强, 陈熙萌 2022 71 074101Google Scholar

    Li P F, Yuan H, Cheng Z D, Qian L B, Liu Z L, Jin B, Ha S, Wan C L, Cui Y, Ma Y, Yang Z H, Lu D, Schuch R, Li M, Zhang H Q, Chen X M 2022 Acta Phys. Sin. 71 074101Google Scholar

    [4]

    Valizadeh R, Malyshev O B, Wang S H, Zolotovskaya S A, Allan Gillespie W, Abdolvand A 2014 Appl. Phys. Lett. 105 231605Google Scholar

    [5]

    董烨, 刘庆想, 庞健, 周海京, 董志伟 2018 67 037901Google Scholar

    Dong Y, Liu Q X, Pang J, Zhou H J, Dong Z W 2018 Acta Phys. Sin. 67 037901Google Scholar

    [6]

    邓晨晖, 韩立, 王岩, 高召顺, 牛耕 2023 材料导报 37 22030065

    Deng C H, Han L, Wang Y, Gao Z S, Niu G 2023 Mater. Rep. 37 22030065

    [7]

    胡笑钏, 陈彦璋, 孙广哲, 吕毅 2023 高电压技术 49 3803Google Scholar

    Hu X C, Chen Y Z, Sun G Z, Lü Y 2023 High Voltage Eng. 49 3803Google Scholar

    [8]

    王丹, 贺永宁, 叶鸣, 崔万照 2018 67 087902Google Scholar

    Wang D, He Y N, Ye M, Cui W Z 2018 Acta Phys. Sin. 67 087902Google Scholar

    [9]

    朱香平, 王丹, 汪辉, 周润东, 李相鑫, 洪云帆, 靳川, 韦永林, 罗朝鹏, 赵卫 2022 科学通报 67 2811Google Scholar

    Zhu X P, Wang D, Wang H, Zhou R D, Li X X, Hong Y F, Jin C, Wei Y L, Luo C P, Zhao W 2022 Chin. Sci. Bull. 67 2811Google Scholar

    [10]

    Li J, Liu B Y, Wu S L, Li Y D, Hu W B 2022 Mater. Lett. 327 133085Google Scholar

    [11]

    张宇心, 王一刚, 葛晓琴, 张波, 尉伟, 裴香涛, 范乐, 王勇 2018 真空科学与技术学报 38 1065Google Scholar

    Zhang Y X, Wang Y G, Ge X Q, Zhang B, Wei W, Pei X T, Fan L, Wang Y 2018 Chin. J. Vac. Sci. Technol. 38 1065Google Scholar

    [12]

    Larciprete R, Grosso D R, Di Trolio A, Cimino R 2015 Appl. Surf. Sci. 328 356Google Scholar

    [13]

    Li J, Yi X K, Hu W B, Gao B Y, Li Y D, Wu S L, Lin S, Zhang J T 2019 Materials 12 2631Google Scholar

    [14]

    Yu S, Jeong T, Yi W, Lee J, Jin S, Heo J, Kimb J M, Jeon D 2001 Appl. Phys. Lett. 79 3281Google Scholar

    [15]

    Ye M, Feng P, Wang D, Song B P, He Y N, Cui W Z 2019 Chin. Phys. B 28 077901Google Scholar

    [16]

    Cohen-Tannoudji C, Diu B, Laloe F 1977 Quantum Mechanics (Vol. 1) (Paris: Wiley-VCH Press) pp216–224

    [17]

    Hu X C, Xiao J, Zhu W, Yu Y X 2018 J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 51 385203Google Scholar

    [18]

    彭敏, 程文杰, 曹猛 2022 空间电子技术 19 72Google Scholar

    Peng M, Cheng W J, Cao M 2022 Space Electron. Technol. 19 72Google Scholar

    [19]

    Nguyen H K A, Mankowski J, Dickens J C, Neuber A A, Joshi R P 2018 AIP Adv. 8 015325Google Scholar

    [20]

    Joy D C 1991 Scanning Microsc. 5 329

    [21]

    Bethe H 1930 Ann. Phys. 397 325Google Scholar

    [22]

    Cao M, Zhang N, Hu T C, Wang F, Cui W Z 2015 J. Phys. D: Appl. Phs. 48 055501Google Scholar

    [23]

    Mott N F 1929 Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A 126 79Google Scholar

    [24]

    Czyżewski Z, MacCallum D O N, Romig A, Joy D C 1990 J. Appl. Phys. 68 3066Google Scholar

    [25]

    Shinotsuka H, Tanuma S, Powell C J, Penn D R 2015 Surf. Interface Anal. 47 871Google Scholar

    [26]

    Da B, Li Z Y, Chang H C, Mao S F, Ding Z J 2014 J. Appl. Phys. 116 124307Google Scholar

    [27]

    Palik E D 1997 Handbook of Optical Constants of Solids (San Diego: Academic Press) pp837–852

    [28]

    Inguimbert C, Gibaru Q, Caron P, Angelucci M, Spallino L, Cimino R 2022 Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. , Sect. B 526 1Google Scholar

    [29]

    Angelucci M, Novelli A, Spallino L, Liedl A, Larciprete R, Cimino R 2020 Phys. Rev. Res. 2 032030Google Scholar

    [30]

    张恒, 崔万照 2016 空间电子技术 3 7Google Scholar

    Zhang H, Cui W Z 2016 Space Electron. Technol. 3 7Google Scholar

    [31]

    胡笑钏, 黄逸清, 陈彦璋, 吕毅 2022 西安交通大学学报 56 144Google Scholar

    Hu X C, Huang Y Q, Chen Y Z, Lü Y 2022 J. Xi’an Jiaotong Univ. 56 144Google Scholar

  • 图 1  a-C/Cu的二次电子发射示意图

    Figure 1.  Schematic diagram of the secondary electron emission of a-C/Cu.

    图 2  基于MC方法的a-C/Cu二次电子发射模拟流程图

    Figure 2.  Flow chart of secondary electron emission from a-C/Cu based on the MC method.

    图 3  电子与a-C和Cu原子的弹性和非弹性散射概率P和电子能量E0的关系

    Figure 3.  Relationship between the elastic and inelastic scattering probability P of electron and a-C or Cu atoms and electron energy E0.

    图 4  MC模拟结果与文献实验结果的对比

    Figure 4.  Comparison of our MC simulation results and the reported experimental results.

    图 5  厚度L对SEY $\delta $的影响 (a)不同L下, $\delta $与$ {E_{{\text{PE}}}} $的关系; (b) ${\delta _{\max1}}$, ${\delta _{\max2}}$, ${E_{\max1}}$和${E_{\max2}}$与L的关系

    Figure 5.  Effects of the thickness L on the SEY $\delta $: (a) $\delta $vs.$ {E_{{\text{PE}}}} $at different L; (b) ${\delta _{\max1}}$, ${\delta _{\max2}}$, ${E_{\max1}}$ and ${E_{\max2}}$vs. L.

    图 6  不同厚度L下的电子散射轨迹分布及规律 (a) L = 0 nm; (b) L = 0.9 nm; (c) L = 1.5 nm; (d) L = 2.4 nm; (e) MPD和${P_{{\text{a-C}}}}$与L的关系. 图(a)—(d)中, 灰色点线表示MPD的位置, 红色曲线表示归一化的电子密度分布

    Figure 6.  Distribution and pattern of electron scattering trajectories with different L: (a) L = 0; (b) L = 0.9 nm; (c) L = 1.5 nm; (d) L = 2.4 nm; (e) MPD and ${P_{{\text{a-C}}}}$ vs. L. In panels (a)–(d), the gray dot line represents the position of the MPD, and the red curve represents the normalized electron density distribution.

    图 7  入射角度$\theta $对SEY $\delta $的影响 (a) 不同$\theta $下, $\delta $与$ {E_{{\text{PE}}}} $的关系; (b) ${\delta _{\max1}}$, ${\delta _{\max2}}$, ${E_{\max1}}$和${E_{\max2}}$与$\theta $的关系; (c) ${\delta _\Delta }$和${E_\Delta }$与$\theta $的关系. 其中, 图(c)中的内插图为${\delta _\Delta }$和${E_\Delta }$的示意图

    Figure 7.  Effects of incident angle $\theta $ on the SEY $\delta $: (a) $\delta $ vs. $ {E_{{\text{PE}}}} $ at different $\theta $; (b) ${\delta _{\max1}}$, ${\delta _{\max2}}$, ${E_{\max1}}$and ${E_{\max2}}$ vs. $\theta $; (c) ${\delta _\Delta }$ and ${E_\Delta }$ vs. $\theta $. In panel (c), the interpolation diagram is a schematic diagram of ${\delta _\Delta }$ and ${E_\Delta }$.

    图 8  不同入射角度$\theta $下的电子的散射轨迹分布及规律(L = 1.5 nm) (a) $\theta $= 0°; (b) $\theta $= 30°; (c) $\theta $= 60°; (d) $\theta $= 80°; (e) MPD和${P_{{\text{a-C}}}}$与$\theta $的关系. 图(a)—(d)中, 灰色点线表示MPD的位置, 红色曲线表示归一化的电子密度分布

    Figure 8.  Distribution and pattern of electron scattering trajectories with different $\theta $ (L = 1.5 nm): (a) $\theta $= 0°; (b) $\theta $= 30°; (c) $\theta $= 60°; (d) $\theta $= 80°; (e) the MPD and ${P_{{\text{a-C}}}}$ vs. $\theta $. In panels (a)–(d), the gray dot line represents the position of the MPD, and the red curve represents the normalized electron density distribution.

    图 9  L对SES的影响 (a) 不同L下的SES; (b) MPE和FWHM与L的关系

    Figure 9.  Effects of L on the SES: (a) SES curves with different L; (b) MPE and FWHM vs. L.

    Baidu
  • [1]

    Kirby R E, King F K 2001 Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. , Sect. A 469 1Google Scholar

    [2]

    Yater J E 2023 J. Appl. Phys. 133 050901Google Scholar

    [3]

    李鹏飞, 袁华, 程紫东, 钱立冰, 刘中林, 靳博, 哈帅, 万城亮, 崔莹, 马越, 杨治虎, 路迪, Reinhold Schuch, 黎明, 张红强, 陈熙萌 2022 71 074101Google Scholar

    Li P F, Yuan H, Cheng Z D, Qian L B, Liu Z L, Jin B, Ha S, Wan C L, Cui Y, Ma Y, Yang Z H, Lu D, Schuch R, Li M, Zhang H Q, Chen X M 2022 Acta Phys. Sin. 71 074101Google Scholar

    [4]

    Valizadeh R, Malyshev O B, Wang S H, Zolotovskaya S A, Allan Gillespie W, Abdolvand A 2014 Appl. Phys. Lett. 105 231605Google Scholar

    [5]

    董烨, 刘庆想, 庞健, 周海京, 董志伟 2018 67 037901Google Scholar

    Dong Y, Liu Q X, Pang J, Zhou H J, Dong Z W 2018 Acta Phys. Sin. 67 037901Google Scholar

    [6]

    邓晨晖, 韩立, 王岩, 高召顺, 牛耕 2023 材料导报 37 22030065

    Deng C H, Han L, Wang Y, Gao Z S, Niu G 2023 Mater. Rep. 37 22030065

    [7]

    胡笑钏, 陈彦璋, 孙广哲, 吕毅 2023 高电压技术 49 3803Google Scholar

    Hu X C, Chen Y Z, Sun G Z, Lü Y 2023 High Voltage Eng. 49 3803Google Scholar

    [8]

    王丹, 贺永宁, 叶鸣, 崔万照 2018 67 087902Google Scholar

    Wang D, He Y N, Ye M, Cui W Z 2018 Acta Phys. Sin. 67 087902Google Scholar

    [9]

    朱香平, 王丹, 汪辉, 周润东, 李相鑫, 洪云帆, 靳川, 韦永林, 罗朝鹏, 赵卫 2022 科学通报 67 2811Google Scholar

    Zhu X P, Wang D, Wang H, Zhou R D, Li X X, Hong Y F, Jin C, Wei Y L, Luo C P, Zhao W 2022 Chin. Sci. Bull. 67 2811Google Scholar

    [10]

    Li J, Liu B Y, Wu S L, Li Y D, Hu W B 2022 Mater. Lett. 327 133085Google Scholar

    [11]

    张宇心, 王一刚, 葛晓琴, 张波, 尉伟, 裴香涛, 范乐, 王勇 2018 真空科学与技术学报 38 1065Google Scholar

    Zhang Y X, Wang Y G, Ge X Q, Zhang B, Wei W, Pei X T, Fan L, Wang Y 2018 Chin. J. Vac. Sci. Technol. 38 1065Google Scholar

    [12]

    Larciprete R, Grosso D R, Di Trolio A, Cimino R 2015 Appl. Surf. Sci. 328 356Google Scholar

    [13]

    Li J, Yi X K, Hu W B, Gao B Y, Li Y D, Wu S L, Lin S, Zhang J T 2019 Materials 12 2631Google Scholar

    [14]

    Yu S, Jeong T, Yi W, Lee J, Jin S, Heo J, Kimb J M, Jeon D 2001 Appl. Phys. Lett. 79 3281Google Scholar

    [15]

    Ye M, Feng P, Wang D, Song B P, He Y N, Cui W Z 2019 Chin. Phys. B 28 077901Google Scholar

    [16]

    Cohen-Tannoudji C, Diu B, Laloe F 1977 Quantum Mechanics (Vol. 1) (Paris: Wiley-VCH Press) pp216–224

    [17]

    Hu X C, Xiao J, Zhu W, Yu Y X 2018 J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 51 385203Google Scholar

    [18]

    彭敏, 程文杰, 曹猛 2022 空间电子技术 19 72Google Scholar

    Peng M, Cheng W J, Cao M 2022 Space Electron. Technol. 19 72Google Scholar

    [19]

    Nguyen H K A, Mankowski J, Dickens J C, Neuber A A, Joshi R P 2018 AIP Adv. 8 015325Google Scholar

    [20]

    Joy D C 1991 Scanning Microsc. 5 329

    [21]

    Bethe H 1930 Ann. Phys. 397 325Google Scholar

    [22]

    Cao M, Zhang N, Hu T C, Wang F, Cui W Z 2015 J. Phys. D: Appl. Phs. 48 055501Google Scholar

    [23]

    Mott N F 1929 Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A 126 79Google Scholar

    [24]

    Czyżewski Z, MacCallum D O N, Romig A, Joy D C 1990 J. Appl. Phys. 68 3066Google Scholar

    [25]

    Shinotsuka H, Tanuma S, Powell C J, Penn D R 2015 Surf. Interface Anal. 47 871Google Scholar

    [26]

    Da B, Li Z Y, Chang H C, Mao S F, Ding Z J 2014 J. Appl. Phys. 116 124307Google Scholar

    [27]

    Palik E D 1997 Handbook of Optical Constants of Solids (San Diego: Academic Press) pp837–852

    [28]

    Inguimbert C, Gibaru Q, Caron P, Angelucci M, Spallino L, Cimino R 2022 Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. , Sect. B 526 1Google Scholar

    [29]

    Angelucci M, Novelli A, Spallino L, Liedl A, Larciprete R, Cimino R 2020 Phys. Rev. Res. 2 032030Google Scholar

    [30]

    张恒, 崔万照 2016 空间电子技术 3 7Google Scholar

    Zhang H, Cui W Z 2016 Space Electron. Technol. 3 7Google Scholar

    [31]

    胡笑钏, 黄逸清, 陈彦璋, 吕毅 2022 西安交通大学学报 56 144Google Scholar

    Hu X C, Huang Y Q, Chen Y Z, Lü Y 2022 J. Xi’an Jiaotong Univ. 56 144Google Scholar

  • [1] Meng Xiang-Chen, Wang Dan, Cai Ya-Hui, Ye Zhen, He Yong-Ning, Xu Ya-Nan. Secondary electron emission suppression on alumina surface and its application in multipactor suppression. Acta Physica Sinica, 2023, 72(10): 107901. doi: 10.7498/aps.72.20222404
    [2] Zhang Han-Tian, Zhou Qian-Hong, Zhou Hai-Jing, Sun Qiang, Song Meng-Meng, Dong Ye, Yang Wei, Yao Jian-Sheng. Effect of secondary electrons on SGEMP response. Acta Physica Sinica, 2021, 70(16): 165201. doi: 10.7498/aps.70.20210461
    [3] Chen Long, Sun Shao-Juan, Jiang Bo-Rui, Duan Ping, An Yu-Hao, Yang Ye-Hui. Characteristics of non-Maxwellian magnetized sheath with secondary electron emission. Acta Physica Sinica, 2021, 70(24): 245201. doi: 10.7498/aps.70.20211061
    [4] Wang Dan, Ye Ming, Feng Peng, He Yong-Ning, Cui Wan-Zhao. An effective reduction on secondary electron emission yield of gold coated surfaces by laser etching. Acta Physica Sinica, 2019, 68(6): 067901. doi: 10.7498/aps.68.20181547
    [5] Wang Ya-Ming, Liu Yong-Li, Zhang Lin. Simulations of Ti nanoparticles upon heating and cooling on an atomic scale. Acta Physica Sinica, 2019, 68(16): 166402. doi: 10.7498/aps.68.20190228
    [6] Zhao Xiao-Yun, Zhang Bing-Kai, Wang Chun-Xiao, Tang Yi-Jia. Effects of q-nonextensive distribution of electrons on secondary electron emission in plasma sheath. Acta Physica Sinica, 2019, 68(18): 185204. doi: 10.7498/aps.68.20190225
    [7] Hu Jing, Cao Meng, Li Yong-Dong, Lin Shu, Xia Ning. Optimization of surface morphology with micro meter size for suppressing secondary electron emission. Acta Physica Sinica, 2018, 67(17): 177901. doi: 10.7498/aps.67.20180466
    [8] Bai Chun-Jiang, Feng Guo-Bao, Cui Wan-Zhao, He Yong-Ning, Zhang Wen, Hu Shao-Guang, Ye Ming, Hu Tian-Cun, Huang Guang-Sun, Wang Qi. Suppressing second electron yield based on porous anodic alumina. Acta Physica Sinica, 2018, 67(3): 037902. doi: 10.7498/aps.67.20172243
    [9] Zhang Na, Cao Meng, Cui Wan-Zhao, Hu Tian-Cun, Wang Rui, Li Yun. Analytical model of secondary electron yield from metal surface with regular structures. Acta Physica Sinica, 2015, 64(20): 207901. doi: 10.7498/aps.64.207901
    [10] Li Yong-Dong, Yang Wen-Jin, Zhang Na, Cui Wan-Zhao, Liu Chun-Liang. A combined phenomenological model for secondary electron emission. Acta Physica Sinica, 2013, 62(7): 077901. doi: 10.7498/aps.62.077901
    [11] Yang Wen-Jin, Li Yong-Dong, Liu Chun-Liang. Model of secondary electron emission at high incident electron energy for metal. Acta Physica Sinica, 2013, 62(8): 087901. doi: 10.7498/aps.62.087901
    [12] Guo Bao-Zeng, Zhang Suo-Liang, Liu Xin. Electron transport property in wurtzite GaN at high electric field with Monte Carlo simulation. Acta Physica Sinica, 2011, 60(6): 068701. doi: 10.7498/aps.60.068701
    [13] Gao Qian, Lou Xiao-Yan, Qi Yang, Shan Wen-Guang. Monte Carlo simulation on the property of ferromagnetic order of Zn1- x Mn x O Nanofilms. Acta Physica Sinica, 2011, 60(3): 036401. doi: 10.7498/aps.60.036401
    [14] Xia Hai-Hong, Zhang Zhong-Bing, Liu Lin-Yue, Ouyang Xiao-Ping, Chen Liang, Wang Qun-Shu, Wang Lan, Ma Yan-Liang, Pan Hong-Bo. Accurate measurements of high energy proton beam by secondary electron compensation. Acta Physica Sinica, 2010, 59(8): 5369-5373. doi: 10.7498/aps.59.5369
    [15] Huang Chao-Jun, Liu Ya-Feng, Long Shu-Ming, Sun Yan-Qing, Wu Zhen-Sen. Monte Carlo simulation of transfer-characteristics of electromagnetic wave propagating in soot. Acta Physica Sinica, 2009, 58(4): 2397-2404. doi: 10.7498/aps.58.2397
    [16] Xiao Pei, Zhang Zeng-Ming, Sun Xia, Ding Ze-Jun. Monte Carlo simulation of electron transmission through masks in projection electron lithography. Acta Physica Sinica, 2006, 55(11): 5803-5809. doi: 10.7498/aps.55.5803
    [17] Gao Guo-Liang, Qian Chang-Ji, Zhong Rui, Luo Meng-Bo, Ye Gao-Xiang. Monte Carlo simulation of cluster growth on an inhomogeneous substrate. Acta Physica Sinica, 2006, 55(9): 4460-4465. doi: 10.7498/aps.55.4460
    [18] DENG CHAO-YONG, ZHAO HUI, WANG YONG-SHENG. SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION OF ELECTRON ENERGY IN THIN FILM ELECTROLUMINESCENT DEVICES. Acta Physica Sinica, 2001, 50(7): 1385-1389. doi: 10.7498/aps.50.1385
    [19] WU FENG-MIN, SHI JIAN-QING, WU ZI-QIN. SIMULATION OF THE INITIAL GROWTH OF METAL THIN FILMS AT HIGH TEMPERATURE. Acta Physica Sinica, 2001, 50(8): 1555-1559. doi: 10.7498/aps.50.1555
    [20] SHANG YE-CHUN, ZHANG YI-MEN, ZHANG YU-MING. MONTE CARLO SIMULATION OF ELECTRON TRANSPORT IN 6H-SiC. Acta Physica Sinica, 2000, 49(9): 1786-1791. doi: 10.7498/aps.49.1786
Metrics
  • Abstract views:  1841
  • PDF Downloads:  66
  • Cited By: 0
Publishing process
  • Received Date:  06 October 2023
  • Accepted Date:  22 November 2023
  • Available Online:  29 November 2023
  • Published Online:  20 February 2024

/

返回文章
返回
Baidu
map