Ultra-wideband thin frequency-selective surface absorber against sheet resistance fluctuation

Wang Dong-Jun; Sun Zi-Han; Zhang Yuan; Tang Li; Yan Li-Ping

doi:10.7498/aps.73.20231365

Abstract

The design of thin frequency selective surface (FSS) absorber based on resistive film that meets the requirements of broadband, polarization independence, incident angle stability, and strong absorption is a challenging task. Fabrication tolerance of resistive film can result in fluctuations in sheet resistance, which negatively affects the absorber performance. To tackle these problems, this work firstly investigates how sheet resistance fluctuations affect the absorbing performance of resistive film FSS absorber. The analysis of simulated surface current density distribution and impedance reveals that the diversity of current paths provides an effective way to mitigate the influence of sheet resistance fluctuation. This is achieved by enabling flexible variation of surface current in response to sheet resistance fluctuations. Consequently, the variation of input impedance of the FSS absorber due to the fluctuation of sheet resistance is suppressed within a small range. Then, a method of extending bandwidth is proposed by employing the complementary variation of FSS impedance with frequency at different layers. By combining this approach with a miniaturization design, a thin and light FSS absorber is developed that exhibits ultra-wide bandwidth, polarization independence and angle stability while mitigating the effects of sheet resistance perturbation. The proposed FSS absorber achieves a 90% absorption bandwidth from 1.50 GHz to 20.50 GHz, covering Ku, X, C, S bands and part of the L and K bands, with a relative bandwidth reaching 173%. The absorber has a thickness of 0.093λ_L for both transverse electric (TE) polarization and transverse magnetic (TM) polarization, yielding a figure of merit (FoM, the ratio of the theoretical minimum thickness to the actual thickness) of 0.95, indicating that the thickness is close to the theoretical limit. The absorber maintains over 90% absorption rate for TM polarization at an incidence angle of up to 70°, and 80% absorption for TE polarization at 45°. Furthermore, the 90% absorbance bandwidth of the absorber remains at 167.0% when the sheet resistance of any FSS layer fluctuates within a range from 12 to 30 Ω/sq. A prototype of the proposed FSS absorber is fabricated and measured, and the experimental results are in good agreement with the simulation results, thus validating the effectiveness of the proposed method.

Keywords:

Authors and contacts

1.
Chengdu Aircraft Industrial (Group) Co. LTD., Chengdu 610073, China
2.
College of Electronics and Information Engineering, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610065, China
3.
School of Electronic Science and Engineering, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu 611731, China

Corresponding author: Yan Li-Ping, liping_yan@scu.edu.cn

Funds: Project supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. U22A2015).

FullText HTML : translate this paragraph

References

[1]	Ramya S, Rao I S 2016 Prog. Electromagn. Res. 50 23 Google Scholar
[2]	Li M, Shen L, Jing L Q, Xu S, Zheng B, Lin X, Yang Y H, Wang Z J, Chen H S 2019 Adv. Sci. 6 1901434 Google Scholar
[3]	Nguyen T K T, Cao T N, Nguyen N H, Tuyen L D, Bui X K, Truong C L, Vu D L, Nguyen T Q H 2021 IEEE Photonics J. 13 1 Google Scholar
[4]	Wang Z J, Yang H C, Jing L Q 2023 J. Opt. 25 74002 Google Scholar
[5]	Liu T, Cao X Y, Gao J, Zheng Q R, Li W Q, Yang H H 2013 IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 61 1479 Google Scholar
[6]	王彦朝, 许河秀, 王朝辉, 王明照, 王少杰 2020 69 134101 Google Scholar Wang Y Z, Xu H X, Wang Z H, Wang M Z, Wang S J 2020 Acta Phys. Sin. 69 134101 Google Scholar
[7]	冯奎胜, 李娜, 李桐 2022 71 034101 Google Scholar Feng K S, Li N, Li T, 2022 Acta Phys. Sin. 71 034101 Google Scholar
[8]	Yu J, Jiang W, Gong S X 2020 IEEE Antennas Wirel. Propag. Lett. 19 1058 Google Scholar
[9]	Huang Z, Luo Z N, Zhao Y, Li H R, Si K X, Han Y, Miao L, Jiang J J 2023 IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 71 6191 Google Scholar
[10]	Panwar R, Puthucheri S, Singh D, Agarwala V 2015 IEEE Trans. Magn. 51 2802804 Google Scholar
[11]	赵宇婷, 李迎松, 杨国辉 2020 69 198101 Google Scholar Zhao Y T, Li Y S, Yang G H 2020 Acta Phys. Sin. 69 198101 Google Scholar
[12]	Chakradhary V K, Baskey H B, Roshan R, Pathik A, Akhtar M. J 2018 IEEE Trans. Microwave Theory Tech. 66 4737 Google Scholar
[13]	Zuo P P, Li T W, Wang M J, Zheng H X, Li E P 2020 IEEE Access 8 6583 Google Scholar
[14]	Shukoor M A, Dey S 2022 IEEE Trans. Electromagn. Compat. 64 1337 Google Scholar
[15]	Hossain M I, Nguyen-Trong N, Sayidmarie K H, Abbosh, A. M 2020 IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 68 8215 Google Scholar
[16]	Rozanov K N 2000 IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 48 1230 Google Scholar
[17]	Yao Z X, Xiao S Q, Jiang Z G, Yan L, Wang B Z 2020 IEEE Antennas Wirel. Propag. Lett. 19 591 Google Scholar
[18]	Panwar R, Puthucheri S, Agarwala V, Singh D 2015 IEEE Trans. Microwave Theory Tech. 63 2438 Google Scholar
[19]	Yang J, Shen Z X 2007 IEEE Antennas Wirel. Propag. Lett. 6 388 Google Scholar
[20]	王莹, 程用志, 聂彦, 龚荣洲 2013 62 074101 Google Scholar Wang Y, Cheng Y Z, Nie Y, Gong R Z 2013 Acta Phys. Sin. 62 074101 Google Scholar
[21]	吴雨明, 王任, 丁霄, 王秉中 2020 69 224201 Google Scholar Wu Y M, Wang R, Ding X, Wang B Z 2020 Acta Phys. Sin. 69 224201 Google Scholar
[22]	Shi T, Jin L, Han L, Tang M C, Xu H X, Qiu C W 2021 IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 69 229 Google Scholar
[23]	He Y, Feng W S, Guo S, Wei J F, Zhang Y L, Huang Z, Li C L, Miao L, Jiang J J 2020 IEEE Antennas Wirel. Propag. Lett. 19 841 Google Scholar
[24]	Yao Z X, Xiao S Q, Li Y, Wang B Z 2022 IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 70 7276 Google Scholar
[25]	Ma Z Y P, Jiang C, Cao W B, Li J L, Huang X Z 2022 IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 70 9376 Google Scholar
[26]	Luo G Q, Yu W, Yu Y, Zhang X H, Shen Z X 2020 IEEE Trans. Microwave Theory Techn. 68 4206.Google Scholar
[27]	Hao X J, Lin X Q, Yang X M, Su Y H, Yao Y, Yang Y L 2023 IEEE Antennas Wirel. Propag. Lett. 22 59 Google Scholar
[28]	Zhang Q Q, Zhao Z Z, Zheng J H, Li F R, Tang J Z, Huang Y, Ren Y X, Chen X M 2023 IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas. 72 8002010 Google Scholar
[29]	Cao Z W, Li H R, Wu Y, Yao G J, Zhao Y, Huang Z, Guo S, Miao L, Jiang J J 2022 IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 70 11217 Google Scholar
[30]	Cao Z W, Yao G J, Zha D C, Zhao Y, Wu Y, Miao L, Bie S W, Jiang J J 2022 IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 70 9942 Google Scholar
[31]	顾超, 屈绍波, 裴志斌, 徐卓, 柏鹏, 彭卫东, 林宝勤 2011 60 087801 Google Scholar Gu C, Qu S B, Pei Z B, Xu Z, Lin B Q, Zhou H, Bai P, Gu W, Peng W, Ma H 2011 Acta Phys. Sin. 60 087801 Google Scholar
[32]	Sun Z H, Yan L P, Zhao X, Gao R X K 2023 IEEE Antennas Wirel. Propag. Lett. 22 789 Google Scholar
[33]	Tirkey M M, Gupta N 2022 IEEE Trans. Electromagn. Compat. 64 66 Google Scholar
[34]	He F, Si K X, Li R, Zha D C, Dong J X, Miao L, Bie S W, Jiang J J 2022 IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 70 8643 Google Scholar
[35]	Kazemzadeh A 2011 IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 59 135 Google Scholar
[36]	Shi T, Tang M C, Yang J N, Yan X S 2022 IEEE Antennas Wireless Propag. Lett. 21 551 Google Scholar
[37]	程用志, 聂彦, 龚荣洲, 王鲜 2013 62 044103 Google Scholar Cheng Y Z, Nie Y, Gong R Z, Wang X 2013 Acta Phys. Sin. 62 044103 Google Scholar
[38]	郭飞, 杜红亮, 屈绍波, 夏颂, 徐卓, 赵建峰, 张红梅 2015 64 077801 Google Scholar Guo F, Du H L, Qu S B Xia S, Xu Z, Zhao J F, Zhang H M 2015 Acta Phys. Sin. 64 077801 Google Scholar
[39]	Hossain M I, Nguyer-Trong N, Abbosh A M 2022 IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 70 410 Google Scholar
[40]	Zheng L, Yang X Z, Gong W, Qiao M K, Li X C 2022 IEEE Antennas Wirel. Propag. Lett. 21 576 Google Scholar
[41]	Li Y, Gu P F, He Z etc. 2022 IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 70 11911 Google Scholar
[42]	Fan Y D, Li D, Ma H Z, Xing J Q, Gu Y J, Ang L K, Li E P 2023 IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 71 2855 Google Scholar
[43]	Zhu M, Yuan H, Li H Y, Wang Y, Cao Q S 2022 IEEE Trans. Electromagn. Compat. 64 2005 Google Scholar
[44]	Wang Y, Min X F, Zhao M X, Yuan H, Li R H, Hu X R, Cao Q S 2022 IEEE Antennas Wirel. Propag. Lett. 21 2125 Google Scholar
[45]	Chen Q, Sang D, Guo M, Fu Y Q, 2018 IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 66 4105 Google Scholar
[46]	Xing Q J, Wu W W, Yan Y C, Zhang X M, Yuan N C 2022 IEEE Antennas Wirel. Propag. Lett. 21 1688 Google Scholar
[47]	Jiang H, Yang W, Lei S W, Hu H Q, Chen B, Bao Y F, He Z Y 2021 Opt. Express 29 29439 Google Scholar
[48]	Li D D, Hu X J, Gao B T, Yin W Y, Chen H S, Qian H L 2023 Prog. Electromagn. Res. 176 35 Google Scholar
[49]	Zhang H B, Zhou P H, Lu H P, Xu Y Q, Liang D F, Deng L J 2013 IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 61 976 Google Scholar
[50]	Min P P, Song Z C, Yang L, Dai B, Zhu J Q 2020 Opt. Express 28 19518 Google Scholar
[51]	孔祥林, 马洪宇, 陈鹏等 2021 电波科学学报 36 947 Google Scholar Kong X L, Ma H Y, Chen P etc. 2021 Chin. J. Radio Sci. 36 947 Google Scholar

Cited By

图 1 分形FSS吸波体结构　(a) 无方环时和 (b) 有方环时的十字分形FSS单元结构; (c) 吸波体侧视图

Figure 1. Structure of the proposed fractal FSS absorber: The cross-fractal structure (a) without and (b) with square ring; (c) side view of the absorber.

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

图 2 分形FSS吸波体的反射系数

Figure 2. The scattering parameters of the fractal FSS absorber.

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

图 3 不同方阻时分形FSS吸波体的 (a)反射系数和(b)吸波率

Figure 3. (a) Reflection coefficient and (b) absorption rate of the fractal FSS absorbers with respect to different sheet resistance.

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

图 4 分形FSS吸波体的输入阻抗随方阻波动的变化　(a) 等效电阻; (b) 等效电抗

Figure 4. Input impedance of the fractal FSS absorber with respect to fluctuation of sheet resistance: (a) Resistance; (b) reactance.

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

图 5 高性能FSS吸波体结构图　(a) 整体结构; (b) FSS I, (c) FSS II 和(d) FSS III的单元结构

Figure 5. Configuration of the proposed FSS absorber: (a) Perspective view; unit cell of (b) FSS I, (c) FSS II and (d) FSS III.

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

图 6 FSS 吸波体(a)分层结构示意图及(b)输入电导和(c)输入电纳

Figure 6. The schematic (a) and input conductance (b) and susceptance (c) of the proposed FSS absorber.

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

图 7 各层处的输入阻抗　(a) 等效电阻; (b) 等效电抗

Figure 7. Input impedance at each layer: (a) Resistance; (b) reactance.

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

图 8 FSS 吸波体散射参数

Figure 8. The scattering parameters of the proposed FSS absorber.

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

图 9 FSS 吸波体吸波率随入射角的变化　(a) TE 极化; (b) TM 极化

Figure 9. Absorption rate with respect to incident angles for (a) TE and (b) TM polarizations.

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

图 10 (a) FSS Ⅰ, (b) FSS Ⅱ 和 (c) FSS Ⅲ 方阻 R_s1, R_s2, R_s3变化对吸波率的影响（注意: 当一层 FSS 层方阻变化时, 另外两层取原值）

Figure 10. Effects of (a) R_s1, (b) R_s2 and (c) R_s3 on absorption rate of the proposed FSS absorber. Note that when the sheet resistance of one FSS layer changes, the other two layers take their original values

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

图 11 (a) FSS Ⅰ 方阻为 5 Ω/sq 和(b) FSS Ⅰ 方阻为 35 Ω/sq 时其他 FSS 层方阻同时变化对吸波率的影响

Figure 11. Effects of simultaneous variation of square resistances of 2nd and 3rd layers on the absorption performance.

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

图 12 (a) 加工样件; (b) 实验测试系统

Figure 12. (a) Fabricated prototype; (b) the experimental setup

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

图 13 (a) TE 与(b) TM 极化下垂直入射测试结果与仿真结果对比

Figure 13. Comparison of measurement and simulation results of (a) TE and (b) TM polarizations for normal incidence.

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

图 14 (a) TE 与(b) TM 极化下不同入射角吸波率测试结果

Figure 14. The measured absorption rate of (a) TE and (b) TM polarizations with respect to incident angles.

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

表 1 分形FSS吸波体参数

Table 1. Structural parameters of the fractal FSS absorber.

参量	值/mm	参量	值/mm
l₁	3.90	w₁	0.58
l₂	2.59	w₂	0.58
l₃	1.38	w₃	0.20
P	11.85	t₁	0.175
h	5.00	t₂	0.05

DownLoad: CSV

表 2 不同方阻情况下分形FSS吸波体的表面电流密度分布

Table 2. Surface current density of the fractal FSS absorber for different sheet resistance

频率	方阻
频率	8 Ω/sq	11 Ω/sq	14 Ω/sq	17 Ω/sq	21 Ω/sq
8 GHz
11 GHz
15 GHz

DownLoad: CSV

表 3 FSS吸波体参数

Table 3. Structural parameters of the FSS absorber.

参量	值/mm	参量	值/mm	参量	值/mm
l₁	10.28	w₁	0.20	s₁	0.56
g₁	0.90	r₁	3.30	w_r1	0.38
r₂	2.54	r₃	1.78	l₂	11.78
w₂	0.50	i₂	2.18	s₂	4.74
w_s2	0.54	g₂	1.62	l₃	10.64
w₃	0.22	i₃	2.96	s₃	2.60
w_s3	0.40	g₃	1.06	P	11.90
h₁	6.00	h₂	0.175

DownLoad: CSV

表 4 与其他宽带FSS吸波体的性能对比

Table 4. Comparison between the proposed and other FSS absorbers.

文献	90%带宽/GHz	FBW/%	厚度 (FoM)	FSS层数	角度稳定性
文献	90%带宽/GHz	FBW/%	厚度 (FoM)	FSS层数	TE	TM
[15]	1.07—9.70	160.3	0.93	2	30° (80%)	60° (80%)
[17]	2.24—11.40	134.3	0.075 λ_L	2	45° (80%)	30° (87%)
[22]	2.11—3.89	59.3	0.090 λ_L	3D	50° (90%)	50° (90%)
[25]	5.80—22.20	117.1	0.155 λ_L	1	50° (90%)	40° (90%)
[29]	0.87—9.28	165.8	0.086 λ_L	2	45° (80%)	45° (90%)
[31]	7.0—27.5	118.8	0.096 λ_L	1	45° (80%)	30° (80%)
[32]	2.79—20.62	152.0	0.119 λ_L	2	60° (80%)	60° (80%)
[34]^#	2.0—15.5	154.3	0.113 λ_L	1	—	—
[36]	1.14—14.2	170.2	0.093 λ_L	3	30° (90%)	50° (90%)
[37]	7.5—42.0	139.4	0.02 λ_L	2	50° (> 80%)	50°(> 80%)
[38]^#*	7.8—18.0	79.1	0.065 λ_L	1	—	—
[39]^*	0.76—4.92	146.5	0.031 λ_L	2	—	—
[41]	2.1—37.5	179.0	0.98	4	45° (80%)	60° (90%)-
[51]	3.16—51.6	176.9	0.102 λ_L	4	45° (80%)	45° (88%)
本文设计	1.50—20.50	173.0	0.95或0.093 λ_L	3	45° (80%)	70° (90%)
注: ^# 代表所用介质层为有耗电介质层; ^* 代表介质层为有耗磁介质.

DownLoad: CSV

map

[1]	Ramya S, Rao I S 2016 Prog. Electromagn. Res. 50 23 Google Scholar
[2]	Li M, Shen L, Jing L Q, Xu S, Zheng B, Lin X, Yang Y H, Wang Z J, Chen H S 2019 Adv. Sci. 6 1901434 Google Scholar
[3]	Nguyen T K T, Cao T N, Nguyen N H, Tuyen L D, Bui X K, Truong C L, Vu D L, Nguyen T Q H 2021 IEEE Photonics J. 13 1 Google Scholar
[4]	Wang Z J, Yang H C, Jing L Q 2023 J. Opt. 25 74002 Google Scholar
[5]	Liu T, Cao X Y, Gao J, Zheng Q R, Li W Q, Yang H H 2013 IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 61 1479 Google Scholar
[6]	王彦朝, 许河秀, 王朝辉, 王明照, 王少杰 2020 69 134101 Google Scholar Wang Y Z, Xu H X, Wang Z H, Wang M Z, Wang S J 2020 Acta Phys. Sin. 69 134101 Google Scholar
[7]	冯奎胜, 李娜, 李桐 2022 71 034101 Google Scholar Feng K S, Li N, Li T, 2022 Acta Phys. Sin. 71 034101 Google Scholar
[8]	Yu J, Jiang W, Gong S X 2020 IEEE Antennas Wirel. Propag. Lett. 19 1058 Google Scholar
[9]	Huang Z, Luo Z N, Zhao Y, Li H R, Si K X, Han Y, Miao L, Jiang J J 2023 IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 71 6191 Google Scholar
[10]	Panwar R, Puthucheri S, Singh D, Agarwala V 2015 IEEE Trans. Magn. 51 2802804 Google Scholar
[11]	赵宇婷, 李迎松, 杨国辉 2020 69 198101 Google Scholar Zhao Y T, Li Y S, Yang G H 2020 Acta Phys. Sin. 69 198101 Google Scholar
[12]	Chakradhary V K, Baskey H B, Roshan R, Pathik A, Akhtar M. J 2018 IEEE Trans. Microwave Theory Tech. 66 4737 Google Scholar
[13]	Zuo P P, Li T W, Wang M J, Zheng H X, Li E P 2020 IEEE Access 8 6583 Google Scholar
[14]	Shukoor M A, Dey S 2022 IEEE Trans. Electromagn. Compat. 64 1337 Google Scholar
[15]	Hossain M I, Nguyen-Trong N, Sayidmarie K H, Abbosh, A. M 2020 IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 68 8215 Google Scholar
[16]	Rozanov K N 2000 IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 48 1230 Google Scholar
[17]	Yao Z X, Xiao S Q, Jiang Z G, Yan L, Wang B Z 2020 IEEE Antennas Wirel. Propag. Lett. 19 591 Google Scholar
[18]	Panwar R, Puthucheri S, Agarwala V, Singh D 2015 IEEE Trans. Microwave Theory Tech. 63 2438 Google Scholar
[19]	Yang J, Shen Z X 2007 IEEE Antennas Wirel. Propag. Lett. 6 388 Google Scholar
[20]	王莹, 程用志, 聂彦, 龚荣洲 2013 62 074101 Google Scholar Wang Y, Cheng Y Z, Nie Y, Gong R Z 2013 Acta Phys. Sin. 62 074101 Google Scholar
[21]	吴雨明, 王任, 丁霄, 王秉中 2020 69 224201 Google Scholar Wu Y M, Wang R, Ding X, Wang B Z 2020 Acta Phys. Sin. 69 224201 Google Scholar
[22]	Shi T, Jin L, Han L, Tang M C, Xu H X, Qiu C W 2021 IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 69 229 Google Scholar
[23]	He Y, Feng W S, Guo S, Wei J F, Zhang Y L, Huang Z, Li C L, Miao L, Jiang J J 2020 IEEE Antennas Wirel. Propag. Lett. 19 841 Google Scholar
[24]	Yao Z X, Xiao S Q, Li Y, Wang B Z 2022 IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 70 7276 Google Scholar
[25]	Ma Z Y P, Jiang C, Cao W B, Li J L, Huang X Z 2022 IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 70 9376 Google Scholar
[26]	Luo G Q, Yu W, Yu Y, Zhang X H, Shen Z X 2020 IEEE Trans. Microwave Theory Techn. 68 4206.Google Scholar
[27]	Hao X J, Lin X Q, Yang X M, Su Y H, Yao Y, Yang Y L 2023 IEEE Antennas Wirel. Propag. Lett. 22 59 Google Scholar
[28]	Zhang Q Q, Zhao Z Z, Zheng J H, Li F R, Tang J Z, Huang Y, Ren Y X, Chen X M 2023 IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas. 72 8002010 Google Scholar
[29]	Cao Z W, Li H R, Wu Y, Yao G J, Zhao Y, Huang Z, Guo S, Miao L, Jiang J J 2022 IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 70 11217 Google Scholar
[30]	Cao Z W, Yao G J, Zha D C, Zhao Y, Wu Y, Miao L, Bie S W, Jiang J J 2022 IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 70 9942 Google Scholar
[31]	顾超, 屈绍波, 裴志斌, 徐卓, 柏鹏, 彭卫东, 林宝勤 2011 60 087801 Google Scholar Gu C, Qu S B, Pei Z B, Xu Z, Lin B Q, Zhou H, Bai P, Gu W, Peng W, Ma H 2011 Acta Phys. Sin. 60 087801 Google Scholar
[32]	Sun Z H, Yan L P, Zhao X, Gao R X K 2023 IEEE Antennas Wirel. Propag. Lett. 22 789 Google Scholar
[33]	Tirkey M M, Gupta N 2022 IEEE Trans. Electromagn. Compat. 64 66 Google Scholar
[34]	He F, Si K X, Li R, Zha D C, Dong J X, Miao L, Bie S W, Jiang J J 2022 IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 70 8643 Google Scholar
[35]	Kazemzadeh A 2011 IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 59 135 Google Scholar
[36]	Shi T, Tang M C, Yang J N, Yan X S 2022 IEEE Antennas Wireless Propag. Lett. 21 551 Google Scholar
[37]	程用志, 聂彦, 龚荣洲, 王鲜 2013 62 044103 Google Scholar Cheng Y Z, Nie Y, Gong R Z, Wang X 2013 Acta Phys. Sin. 62 044103 Google Scholar
[38]	郭飞, 杜红亮, 屈绍波, 夏颂, 徐卓, 赵建峰, 张红梅 2015 64 077801 Google Scholar Guo F, Du H L, Qu S B Xia S, Xu Z, Zhao J F, Zhang H M 2015 Acta Phys. Sin. 64 077801 Google Scholar
[39]	Hossain M I, Nguyer-Trong N, Abbosh A M 2022 IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 70 410 Google Scholar
[40]	Zheng L, Yang X Z, Gong W, Qiao M K, Li X C 2022 IEEE Antennas Wirel. Propag. Lett. 21 576 Google Scholar
[41]	Li Y, Gu P F, He Z etc. 2022 IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 70 11911 Google Scholar
[42]	Fan Y D, Li D, Ma H Z, Xing J Q, Gu Y J, Ang L K, Li E P 2023 IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 71 2855 Google Scholar
[43]	Zhu M, Yuan H, Li H Y, Wang Y, Cao Q S 2022 IEEE Trans. Electromagn. Compat. 64 2005 Google Scholar
[44]	Wang Y, Min X F, Zhao M X, Yuan H, Li R H, Hu X R, Cao Q S 2022 IEEE Antennas Wirel. Propag. Lett. 21 2125 Google Scholar
[45]	Chen Q, Sang D, Guo M, Fu Y Q, 2018 IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 66 4105 Google Scholar
[46]	Xing Q J, Wu W W, Yan Y C, Zhang X M, Yuan N C 2022 IEEE Antennas Wirel. Propag. Lett. 21 1688 Google Scholar
[47]	Jiang H, Yang W, Lei S W, Hu H Q, Chen B, Bao Y F, He Z Y 2021 Opt. Express 29 29439 Google Scholar
[48]	Li D D, Hu X J, Gao B T, Yin W Y, Chen H S, Qian H L 2023 Prog. Electromagn. Res. 176 35 Google Scholar
[49]	Zhang H B, Zhou P H, Lu H P, Xu Y Q, Liang D F, Deng L J 2013 IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 61 976 Google Scholar
[50]	Min P P, Song Z C, Yang L, Dai B, Zhu J Q 2020 Opt. Express 28 19518 Google Scholar
[51]	孔祥林, 马洪宇, 陈鹏等 2021 电波科学学报 36 947 Google Scholar Kong X L, Ma H Y, Chen P etc. 2021 Chin. J. Radio Sci. 36 947 Google Scholar

[1]	Wang Cheng-Rong, Tang Li, Zhou Yan-Ping, Zhao Xiang, Liu Chang-Jun, Yan Li-Ping. Switchable and optically transparent ultrawide stopband frequency selective surface for electromagnetic shielding. Acta Physica Sinica, 2024, 73(12): 124201. doi: 10.7498/aps.73.20240339
[2]	Wang Chao-Hui, Li Yong-Xiang, Zhu Shuai. Absorbers with spin-selection based on metasurface. Acta Physica Sinica, 2020, 69(23): 234103. doi: 10.7498/aps.69.20200511
[3]	Zeng Li, Liu Guo-Biao, Zhang Hai-Feng, Huang Tong. An ultrawideband linear-to-circular polarization converter based on multiphysics regulation. Acta Physica Sinica, 2019, 68(5): 054101. doi: 10.7498/aps.68.20181615
[4]	Xu Jin, Li Rong-Qiang, Jiang Xiao-Ping, Wang Shen-Yun, Han Tian-Cheng. Ultra-wideband linear polarization converter based on square split ring. Acta Physica Sinica, 2019, 68(11): 117801. doi: 10.7498/aps.68.20190267
[5]	Guo Chang, Zhang Yan. Super diffraction imaging with wave vector selective metasurface. Acta Physica Sinica, 2017, 66(14): 147804. doi: 10.7498/aps.66.147804
[6]	Zhang Yu-Ping, Li Tong-Tong, Lü Huan-Huan, Huang Xiao-Yan, Zhang Hui-Yun. Study on sensing characteristics of I-shaped terahertz metamaterial absorber. Acta Physica Sinica, 2015, 64(11): 117801. doi: 10.7498/aps.64.117801
[7]	Dang Ke-Zheng, Shi Jia-Ming, Li Zhi-Gang, Meng Xiang-Hao, Wang Qi-Chao. Design of multiband Salisbury screen based on high impedance surfaces. Acta Physica Sinica, 2015, 64(11): 114101. doi: 10.7498/aps.64.114101
[8]	Yu Ji-Bao, Ma Hua, Wang Jia-Fu, Feng Ming-De, Li Yong-Feng, Qu Shao-Bo. High-efficiency ultra-wideband polarization conversion metasurfaces based on split elliptical ring resonators. Acta Physica Sinica, 2015, 64(17): 178101. doi: 10.7498/aps.64.178101
[9]	Hui Yi-Cong, Wang Chun-Qi, Huang Xiao-Zhong. Design and fabrication of broadband radar metamaterial absorber based on the resistor FSS. Acta Physica Sinica, 2015, 64(21): 218102. doi: 10.7498/aps.64.218102
[10]	Lan Feng, Gao Xi, Qi Li-Mei. Terahertz bandpass filter using double-layer reformative complementary frequency selective surface structures. Acta Physica Sinica, 2014, 63(10): 104209. doi: 10.7498/aps.63.104209
[11]	Xu Yong-Shun, Bie Shao-Wei, Jiang Jian-Jun, Xu Hai-Bing, Wan Dong, Zhou Jie. Composite absorber of broadband and high attenuation with spiral frequency selective surfaces. Acta Physica Sinica, 2014, 63(20): 205202. doi: 10.7498/aps.63.205202
[12]	Mo Man-Man, Wen Qi-Ye, Chen Zhi, Yang Qing-Hui, Li Sheng, Jing Yu-Lan, Zhang Huai-Wu. A polarization-independent and ultra-broadband terahertz metamaterial absorber studied based on circular-truncated cone structure. Acta Physica Sinica, 2013, 62(23): 237801. doi: 10.7498/aps.62.237801
[13]	Liu Ming, Zhang Ming-Jiang, Wang An-Bang, Wang Long-Sheng, Ji Yong-Ning, Ma Zhe. Generation of ultra-wideband signals by directly current-modulating distributed feedback laser diode subjected to optical feedback. Acta Physica Sinica, 2013, 62(6): 064209. doi: 10.7498/aps.62.064209
[14]	Xia Bu-Gang, Zhang De-Hai, Meng Jin, Zhao Xin. Restrain the spurious resonance of second-order fractal frequency selective surface in MMW band. Acta Physica Sinica, 2013, 62(17): 174103. doi: 10.7498/aps.62.174103
[15]	Gong Yun-Rui, He Di, He Chen. Investigation of blind detection mechanism for chaotic UWB system based on generalized negentrogy. Acta Physica Sinica, 2012, 61(12): 120502. doi: 10.7498/aps.61.120502
[16]	Liu Tao, Cao Xiang-Yu, Gao Jun, Zheng Qiu-Rong, Li Wen-Qiang. Design of metamaterial absorber and its applications for waveguide slot antenna. Acta Physica Sinica, 2012, 61(18): 184101. doi: 10.7498/aps.61.184101
[17]	Zhou Hang, Qu Shao-Bo, Peng Wei-Dong, Wang Jia-Fu, Ma Hua, Zhang Dong-Wei, Zhang Jie-Qiu, Bai Peng, Xu Zhuo. A novel frequency selective surface loaded with resistance films absobers. Acta Physica Sinica, 2012, 61(10): 104201. doi: 10.7498/aps.61.104201
[18]	Chen Qian, Jiang Jian-Jun, Bie Shao-Wei, Wang Peng, Liu Peng, Xu Xin-Xin. Tunable composite absorber with active frequency selective surface. Acta Physica Sinica, 2011, 60(7): 074202. doi: 10.7498/aps.60.074202
[19]	Yang Rui, Xie Yong-Jun, Hu Hai-Peng, Wang Rui, Man Ming-Yuan, Wu Zhao-Hai. Ultra wideband planner inverted-F antenna with metamaterials loading. Acta Physica Sinica, 2010, 59(5): 3173-3178. doi: 10.7498/aps.59.3173
[20]	Wang Peng, Zhao Huan, Zhao Yan-Ying, Wang Zhao-Hua, Tian Jin-Rong, Li De-Hua, Wei Zhi-Yi. Pulse width measurement of ultra-broad-bandwidth Ti: sapphire oscillator using SPIDER technique. Acta Physica Sinica, 2007, 56(1): 224-228. doi: 10.7498/aps.56.224

Catalog

Vol. 73, Issue 2 - 2024-01-20

Metrics

Abstract views: 2631
PDF Downloads: 150
Cited By: 0

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

Search

Article

留言板