-
Nondegenerate two-photon absorption is a nonlinear optical effect in which two photons with different energy are absorbed by a medium simultaneously, resulting in a single electron transition from ground state to excited state through an intermediate virtual state. Compared with the degenerate two-photon absorption coefficient, the absorption coefficient of nondegenerate two-photon absorption is increased by tens or even hundreds of times due to the intermediate resonance effect, so it has great potentials in many nonlinear optical applications. Firstly, the basic principle of two-photon absorption is introduced and the enhancement mechanism of non-degenerate two-photon absorption is explained in this paper. Secondly, the basic method of measuring two-photon absorption is introduced in detail. Thirdly, the reports on nondegenerate two-photon absorption of three-dimensional semiconductor materials and two-dimensional materials are reviewed. Finally, the application progress of infrared detection and imaging, two-photon fluorescence microscope, all-optical switch and optical modulation is summarized, and the future research in this field is summarized and prospected.
-
Keywords:
- non-degenerate two-photon absorption /
- infrared detection /
- nonlinear optics /
- two-photon fluorescence imaging /
- all optical switch and modulation
[1] Franken P A, Hill A E, Peters C W, Weinreich G 1961 Phys. Rev. Lett. 7 118Google Scholar
[2] Ferrando A, Pastor J P M, Suarez I 2018 J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 9 5612Google Scholar
[3] Nozaki K, Tanabe T, Shinya A, Matsuo S, Sato T, Taniyama H, Notomi M 2010 Nat. Photonics 4 477Google Scholar
[4] Boggess A S, Moss S, Boyd I, Van Stryland E 1985 IEEE J. Quantum Electron. 21 488Google Scholar
[5] Hagan D J, van Stryland E W, Soileau M J, Wu Y Y, Guha S 1988 Opt. Lett. 13 315Google Scholar
[6] Helmchen F, Denk W 2005 Nat. Methods 2 932Google Scholar
[7] Park S H, Yang D Y, Lee K S 2009 Laser Photon. Rev. 3 1Google Scholar
[8] Gu M, Li X P, Cao Y Y 2014 Light Sci. Appl. 3 e177Google Scholar
[9] Gao D, Agayan R R, Xu H, Philbert M A, Kopelman R 2006 Nano Lett. 6 2383Google Scholar
[10] Xu G J, Ren X Y, Miao Q C, Yan M, Pan H F, Chen X L, Wu G, Wu E 2019 IEEE Photon. 31 1944Google Scholar
[11] Pattanaik H S, Reichert M, Hagan D J, Van Stryland E W 2016 Opt. Express 24 1196Google Scholar
[12] Fix B, Jaeck J, Vest B, Verdun M, Beaudoin G, Sagnes I, Pelouard J L, Haidar R 2017 Appl. Phys. Lett. 111 041102Google Scholar
[13] Fang J N, Wang Y Q, Yan M, Wu E, Huang K, Zeng H P 2020 Phys. Rev. Appl. 14 064035Google Scholar
[14] Boitier F, Dherbecourt J B, Godard A, Rosencher E 2009 Appl. Phys. Lett. 94 081112Google Scholar
[15] Apiratikul P, Murphy T E 2010 IEEE Photon. 22 212Google Scholar
[16] Mahou P, Zimmerley M, Loulier K, Matho K S, Labroille G, Morin X, Supatto W, Livet J, Debarre D, Beaurepaire E 2012 Nat. Methods 9 815Google Scholar
[17] Perillo E P, Jarrett J W, Liu Y L, Hassan A, Fernee D C, Goldak J R, Bonteanu A, Spence D J, Yeh H C, Dunn A K 2017 Light Sci. Appl. 6 e17095Google Scholar
[18] Stringari C, Abdeladim L, Malkinson G, Mahou P, Solinas X, Lamarre I, Brizion S, Galey J B, Supatto W, Legouis R, Pena A M, Beaurepaire E 2017 Sci. Rep. 7 3792Google Scholar
[19] Quentmeier S, Denicke S, Gericke K H 2009 J. Fluoresc. 19 1037Google Scholar
[20] Liang T K, Nunes L R, Tsuchiya M, Abedin K S, Miyazaki T, Van Thourhout D, Bogaerts W, Dumon P, Baets R, Tsang H K 2006 Opt. Commun. 265 171Google Scholar
[21] Shen L, Healy N, Mitchell C J, Penades J S, Nedeljkovic M, Mashanovich G Z, Peacock A C 2015 Opt. Lett. 40 2213Google Scholar
[22] Liang T K, Nunes L R, Sakamoto T, Sasagawa K, Kawanishi T, Tsuchiya M, Priem G R A, van Thourhout D, Dumon P, Baets R, Tsang H K 2005 Opt. Express 13 7298Google Scholar
[23] Wang W, Wei Q, Gong Y Y, Xing G C, Wu B, Zhou G F 2022 Adv. Opt. Mater. 10 2200400Google Scholar
[24] Pascal S, David S, Andraud C, Maury O 2021 Chem. Soc. Rev. 50 6613Google Scholar
[25] Pawlicki M, Collins H A, Denning R G, Anderson H L 2009 Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 48 3244Google Scholar
[26] Sheik-Bahae M, Hutchings D C, Hagan D J, Member, Van Stryland E W 1991 IEEE J. Quantum Electron. 27 1296Google Scholar
[27] Fishman D A, Cirloganu C M, Webster S, Padilha L A, Monroe M, Hagan D J, Van Stryland E W 2011 Nat. Photonics 5 561Google Scholar
[28] Kriso C, Stein M, Haeger T, Pourdavoud N, Gerhard M, Rahimi-Iman A, Riedl T, Koch M 2020 Opt. Lett. 45 2431Google Scholar
[29] Chen S, Zheng M L, Dong X Z, Zhao Z S, Duan X M 2013 J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 30 3117Google Scholar
[30] Said A A, Sheik-Bahae M, Hagan D J, Wei T H, Wang J, Young Y, Van Stryland E W 1992 J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 9 405
[31] Wherrett B S 1984 J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 1 67Google Scholar
[32] Rumi M, Perry J W 2010 Adv. Opt. Photonics 2 451Google Scholar
[33] Negres R A, Hales J M, Kobyakov A, Hagan D J, van Stryland E W 2002 Opt. Lett. 27 270Google Scholar
[34] Cirloganu C M, Padilha L A , Fishman D A, Webster S, Hagan D J, Van Stryland E W 2011 Opt. Express 19 22951Google Scholar
[35] Reichert M, Smirl A L, Salamo G, Hagan D J, Van Stryland E W 2016 Phys. Rev. Lett. 117 073602Google Scholar
[36] Olszak P D, Cirloganu C M, Webster S, Padilha L A, Guha S, Gonzalez L P, Krishnamurthy S, Hagan D J, Van Stryland E W 2010 Phys. Rev. B 82 235207Google Scholar
[37] Knez D, Hanninen A M, Prince R C, Potma E O, Fishman D A 2020 Light Sci. Appl. 9 125Google Scholar
[38] Bolger J A, Kar A . K, Wherrett B S 1993 Opt. Commun. 97 203Google Scholar
[39] Olson B V, Gehlsen M P, Boggess T F 2013 Opt. Commun. 304 54Google Scholar
[40] Krauss-Kodytek L, Ruppert C, Betz M 2021 Opt. Express 29 34522Google Scholar
[41] Wagner T J, Bohn M J, Coutu R A, et al. 2010 J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 27 2122Google Scholar
[42] Liang H J, Ma Q C, Liu J, Shi X W, Yang G J, Chen S, Liang E 2019 J. Nonlinear Opt. Phys. Mater. 28 1950015Google Scholar
[43] Walters G, Sutherland B R, Hoogland S, Shi D, Comin R, Sellan D P, Bakr O M, Sargent E H 2015 ACS Nano 9 9340Google Scholar
[44] Cox N, Wei J, Pattanaik H, Tabbakh T, Gorza S-P, Hagan D, Van Stryland E W 2020 Phys. Re. Res. 2 013376Google Scholar
[45] Cui Q N, Li Y Y, Chang J H, Zhao H, Xu C X 2019 Laser Photon. Rev. 13 1800225Google Scholar
[46] Grinblat G, Abdelwahab I, Nielsen M P, Dichtl P, Leng K, Oulton R F, Loh K P, Maier S A 2019 ACS Nano 13 9504Google Scholar
[47] Lin Q, Zhang J, Piredda G, Boyd R W, Fauchet P M, Agrawal G P 2007 Appl. Phys. Lett. 91 021111Google Scholar
[48] Wang G, Mei S L, Liao J F, Wang W, Tang Y X, Zhang Q, Tang Z K, Wu B, Xing G C 2021 Small 17 2100809Google Scholar
[49] Lee C, Fan H 1974 Phys. Rev. B 9 3502Google Scholar
[50] Li Y X, Dong N N, Zhang S F, Zhang X Y, Feng Y Y, Wang KP, Zhang L, Wang J 2015 Laser Photon. Rev. 9 427Google Scholar
[51] Liu W W, Xing J, Zhao J X, Wen X L, Wang K, Lu P X, Xiong Q 2017 Adv. Opt. Mater. 5 1601045Google Scholar
[52] Zhang S F, Dong N N, McEvoy N, O’Brien M, Winters S, Berner N C, Yim C Y, Li Y X, Zhang X Y, Chen Z H, Zhang L, Duesberg G S, Wang J 2015 ACS Nano 9 7142Google Scholar
[53] Yang H Z, Feng X B, Wang Q, Huang H, Chen W, Wee A T S, Ji W 2011 Nano Lett. 11 2622Google Scholar
[54] Zhou F, Abdelwahab I, Leng K, Loh K P, Ji W 2019 Adv. Mater. 31 e1904155Google Scholar
[55] Sadegh S, Yang M H, Ferri C G L, Thunemann M, Saisan P A, Devor A, Fainman Y 2019 Opt. Express 27 8335Google Scholar
[56] Sadegh S, Yang M H, Ferri C G L, Thunemann M, Saisan P A, Wei Z, Rodriguez E A, Adams S R, Kilic K, Boas D A, Sakadzic S, Devor A, Fainman Y 2019 Opt. Express 27 28022Google Scholar
[57] Xue B, Katan C, Bjorgaard J, Kobayashi T 2015 AIP Adv. 5 127138Google Scholar
[58] Xu C, Webb W W 1996 JOSA B 13 481Google Scholar
[59] Makarov N S, Drobizhev M, Rebane A 2008 Opt. Express 16 4029Google Scholar
[60] Chen S, Zheng Y C, Zheng M L, Dong X Z, Jin F, Zhao Z S, Duan X M 2017 J. Mater. Chem. C 5 470Google Scholar
[61] Elayan I A, Brown A 2023 Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. DOI: 10.1039/D3CP00723E
[62] Wolleschensky R, Feurer T, Sauerbrey R, Simon U 1998 Appl. Phys. B-Lasers O. 67 87Google Scholar
[63] Pascal S, Chi S H, Grichine A, Martel-Frachet V, Perry J W, Maury O, Andraud C 2022 Dyes Pigm. 203 110369Google Scholar
[64] Rogalski A, Martyniuk P, Kopytko M 2016 Rep. Prog. Phys. 79 046501Google Scholar
[65] Adiyan U, Larsen T, Zarate J J, Villanueva L G, Shea H 2019 Nat. Commun. 10 4518Google Scholar
[66] Korzh B, Zhao Q Y, Allmaras J P, Frasca S, Autry T M, Bersin E A, Beyer A D, Briggs R M, Bumble B, Colangelo M, Crouch G M, Dane A E, Gerrits T, Lita A E, Marsili F, Moody G, Peña C, Ramirez E, Rezac J D, Sinclair N, Stevens M J, Velasco A E, Verma V B, Wollman E E, Xie S, Zhu D, Hale P D, Spiropulu M, Silverman K L, Mirin R P, Nam S W, Kozorezov A G, Shaw M D, Berggren K K 2020 Nat. Photonics 14 250Google Scholar
[67] Hu W D, Ye Z H, Liao L, Chen H L, Chen L, Ding R J, He L, Chen X S, Lu W 2014 Opt. Lett. 39 5184Google Scholar
[68] Martyniuk P, Rogalski A 2015 Infrared Phys. Technol. 70 125Google Scholar
[69] Dam J S, Tidemand-Lichtenberg P, Pedersen C 2012 Nat. Photonics 6 788Google Scholar
[70] Kuo P S, Slattery O, Kim Y S, Pelc J S, Fejer M M, Tang X 2013 Opt. Express 21 22523Google Scholar
[71] Barh A, Rodrigo P J, Meng L, Pedersen C, Tidemand-Lichtenberg P 2019 Adv. Opt. Photon. 11 952Google Scholar
[72] Pelc J S, Ma L, Phillips C R, Zhang Q, Langrock C, Slattery O, Tang X, Fejer M M 2011 Opt. Express 19 21445Google Scholar
[73] Bristow A D, Rotenberg N, Van Driel H M 2007 Appl. Phys. Lett. 90 191104Google Scholar
[74] Denk W, Strickler J H, Webb W W 1990 Science 248 73Google Scholar
[75] Niesner R, Andresen V, Neumann J, Spiecker H, Gunzer M 2007 Biophys. J. 93 2519Google Scholar
[76] Weissleder R, Ntziachristos V 2003 Nat. Med. 9 123Google Scholar
[77] Xu H T, Chen S, Mu K J, Wang J Q, Tian Y Z, Su S L, Mao Y C, Liang E J 2018 J. Nonlinear Opt. Phys. Mater. 27 1850027Google Scholar
[78] Hales J M, Hagan D J, Van Stryland E W, Schafer K J, Morales A R, Belfield K D, Pacher P, Kwon O, Zojer E, Bredas J L 2004 J. Chem. Phys. 121 3152Google Scholar
[79] Lakowicz J R, Gryczynski I, Malak H, Gryczynski Z 1996 Photochem. Photobiol. 64 632Google Scholar
[80] Robinson T, Valluri P, Kennedy G, Sardini A, Dunsby C, Neil M A, Baldwin G S, French P M, de Mello A J 2014 Anal. Chem. 86 10732Google Scholar
[81] Quentmeier S, Denicke S, Ehlers J E, Niesner R A, Gericke K H 2008 J. Phys. Chem. B 112 5768Google Scholar
[82] Yang M H, Abashin M, Saisan P A, Tian P, Ferri C G, Devor A, Fainman Y 2016 Opt. Express 24 30173Google Scholar
[83] Cambaliza M O, Saloma C 2000 Opt. Commun. 184 25Google Scholar
[84] Ibanez-Lopez C, Escobar I, Saavedra G, Martinez-Corral M 2004 Microsc. Res. Techniq. 64 96Google Scholar
[85] Blanca C M, Saloma C 2001 Appl. Opt. 40 2722Google Scholar
[86] Lim M, Saloma C 2003 Appl. Opt. 42 3398Google Scholar
[87] Garini Y, Young I T, McNamara G 2006 Cytom. Part A 69 735
[88] Almeida V R, Barrios C A, Panepucci R R, Lipson M, Foster M A, Ouzounov D G, Gaeta A L 2004 Opt. Lett. 29 2867Google Scholar
[89] Abdalla S, Ng S, Barrios P, Celo D, Delage A, El-Mougy S, Golub I, He J J, Janz S, McKinnon R 2004 IEEE Photon. 16 1038Google Scholar
[90] Först M, Niehusmann J, Plötzing T, Bolten J, Wahlbrink T, Moormann C, Kurz H 2007 Opt. Lett. 32 2046Google Scholar
[91] Li C F, Dou N 2009 Chin. Phys. Lett. 26 054203Google Scholar
[92] Mukherjee K, Kumbhakar D 2012 Optik 123 489Google Scholar
[93] Mehta P, Healy N, Day T, Sparks J, Sazio P, Badding J, Peacock A 2011 Opt. Express 19 19078Google Scholar
[94] Yu S, Wu X, Wang Y, Guo X, Tong L 2017 Adv. Mater. 29 1606128Google Scholar
[95] Wang C, Gao L, Chen H, Xu Y, Ma C, Yao H, Song Y, Zhang H 2021 Nanophotonics 10 2617Google Scholar
[96] Chai Z, Hu X Y, Wang F F, Niu X X, Xie J Y, Gong Q H 2017 Adv. Opt. Mater. 5 1600665Google Scholar
-
图 3 典型三维半导体的ND-TPA (a) CdTe和(b) ZnO时间分辨归一化透射率曲线[34]; (c)—(e) ZnSe, ZnO, CdTe和GaAs的ND-TPA和D-TPA系数与泵浦-探测光子的能量依赖图[34]; (f) 泵浦-探测偏振方向对闪锌矿型ZnS的ND-TPA的影响, 其中探测光偏振方向平行于z轴, 泵浦偏振平行或者垂直于探测偏振方向[29]
Figure 3. The ND-TPA of typical 3D semiconductors: Normalized transmission dynamics of (a) CdTe and (b) ZnO single crystals[34]; (c)–(e) ND-TPA and D-TPA coefficients of ZnSe, ZnO, CdTe and GaAs[34]; (f) pump-probe polarization-dependent ND-TPA coefficients for ZnS single crystal. The polarization of the probe beam is along the z axis, while that for the pump beam is either parallel or perpendicular to the probe polarization[29].
图 4 典型二维材料的ND-TPA (a)单层WS2的瞬态透射动力学曲线与功率依赖关系, 激发波长 776 nm, 功率0.23—2.96 mW, 0 fs之前负信号归因为ND-TPA[45]; (b)单层WS2的瞬态透射动力学曲线分解为ND-TPA部分和D-TPA部分贡献, 黑点为原始数据, 蓝点源于D-TPA, 红点源于ND-TPA[45]; (c) 8 nm GaAs/12 nm Al0.32Ga0.68As 量子阱的ND-TPA系数及理论预测曲线, 此处泵浦与探测偏振均为TM[44]; (d) (BA)2(MA)n–1PbnX3n+1钙钛矿薄片的超快光透射调控, 泵浦波长760—980 nm, 功率3.5 μW; 探测波长705 nm, 实线为Lorentz拟合的调制宽度为13 fs[54]
Figure 4. The ND-TPA of typical 2D semiconductors: (a) Power-dependent transient transmission dynamics of monolayer WS2, the pump wavelength is 776 nm and power in the range of 0.23–2.96 mW, the dip before time zero is attributed to ND-TPA[45]; (b) the decoupling of transient transmission dynamics for monolayer WS2, black squares are original data, blue dots are due to D-TPA and red triangles are attributed to ND-TPA[45]; (c) ND-TPA coefficients of 8 nm GaAs/12 nm Al0.32Ga0.68As quantum well as a function of sum wavelength and its theoretical prediction, and the polarizations of both the pump and probe beams are TM[44]; (d) ultrafast modulation of light using exfoliated (BA)2(A)n–1PbnX3n+1 flakes. Pump beam: 760–980 nm, power: 3.5 μW. Probe beam: 705 nm. Solid line is a fit using Lorentzian function and 13 fs is obtained for the ultrafast modulation[54].
图 5 ND-TPA用于红外光子计数与探测 (a) GaAs红外光子计数示意图[14]; (b) GaAs红外光子计数与信号光功率及泵浦强度的依赖关系[14]; (c) GaN探测器用于中红外光探测示意图[27]; (d) GaN探测器输出电压与输入红外信号光能量及泵浦功率依赖关系, 信号波长5.6 μm, 门脉冲390 nm[27]; (e) Si-APD红外计数速率与输入脉冲能量关系, 泵浦光波长3.07 μm, 能量为0.32 nJ[13]; (f) MAPbBr3单晶与Si探头组合对1.7 μm红外光探测[23]
Figure 5. ND-TPA for infrared photon counting and detection: (a) Schematics of infrared photon counting using GaAs photodetector[14]; (b) ND-TPA photon counts as a function of the signal power for different pump intensities using GaAs photodetector; (c) schematics of mid-infrared photodetection using a GaN photodiode[27]; (d) output voltage of a GaN diode versus 5.6 μm input signal energy in the presence of temporally overlapped 390 nm gating pulses of various energies[27]; (e) recorded count rates by the SiAPD as a function of input pulse energy, pump pulse wavelength of 3.07 μm, energy of 0.32 nJ[13]; (f) 1.7 μm infrared photodetection using a combination of MAPbBr3 single crystal and Si photodiode[23].
图 6 ND-TPA用于中红外成像 (a)用于三维红外成像的GaAs半导体孔状结构[11]; (b)基于GaN的ND-TPA对该结构的三维成像图[11]; (c)图(b)中A、B两点对应的泵浦探测光互相关信号[11]; (d)基于硅基CCD相机的ND-TPA中红外振动成像系统示意图[37]; (e)印有黑色字母的醋酸纤维素薄膜的中红外选择性成像. b, c, d点分别对应的是成像激光远离振动吸收、接近振动吸收峰和与在振动吸收峰上3种波长对应的成像效果图[37]
Figure 6. ND-TPA for mid-infrared imaging: (a) GaAs semiconductor structure used for the 3D imaging[11]; (b) 3D imaging of the GaAs structure using the ND-TPA of a GaN photodiode[11]; (c) the cross-correlation curves of points A and B in Fig. (b)[11]; (d) schematics of the vibration imaging method based on the ND-TPA of a Si CCD[37]; (e) imaging a cellulose acetate film with printed letters at selected wavelengths, wavelength b: far away from the absorption of C-H vibration, c: near the absorption peak; d: at the absorption peak[37].
图 7 ND-TPA用于双光子荧光显微生物成像 (a)常用的基于ND-TPA的双光子生物成像的原理示意图[16]; (b)由脑虹构建的mCerulean (CFP)、mEYFP、tdTomato和/或mCherry编码的荧光蛋白的双光子激发光谱[16]; (c)小鼠皮层450 μm厚的z堆叠中提取的多色图像(左), 不同深度(z = 50, 250, 400 μm)的成像截面(右)[16]; (d)基于双色激发(λ1 = 1055 nm, λ2 = 1240 nm)的小鼠脑部三维成像图[17]; (e)小鼠脑部双色双光子激发荧光信号与深度的依赖关系, 1C2P为D-TPA激发(λ1 = 1055 nm), 2C2P为双色激发(λ1 = 1055 nm, λ2 = 1240 nm), τ = –600 fs, 0 fs为两种激发光的时间差[17]
Figure 7. ND-TPA for two-color two-phonon fluorescence imaging: (a) A typical setup of multicolor two-photon imaging using synchronized pulses[16]; (b) two-photon excitation spectra of the fluorescent proteins encoded by the Brainbow constructs mCerulean (CFP), mEYFP, tdTomato and/or mCherry, arrows indicate the excitation wavelengths[16]; (c) multicolor images of a mouse cortex extracted from a 450-μm-thick z stack (left), image slices at different depth (z = 50, 250, 400 μm) (right)[16]; (d) the 3D image of a mouse brain using the two-color (λ1 = 1055 nm, λ2 = 1240 nm) two-phonon fluorescence imaging technique[17]; (e) two-photon excited fluorescence signal intensity versus tissue depth in a mouse brain. 1C2P: D-TPA excitation (λ1 = 1055 nm), 2C2P: ND-TPA excitation (λ1 = 1055 nm, λ2 = 1240 nm), τ = –600 fs, 0 fs: the time intervals between the excitation pulses[17].
图 8 (a) 用于全光开关的实验装置, EDFA: 掺铒光纤放大器, OBF: 光带通滤波器, PD: 光电二极管, DSO: 数字采样示波器[22]; (b) 1552 nm泵浦脉冲和(c) 1536 nm处的交叉吸收调制连续波信号[22]; (d) NOR门操作原理和真值表[20]; (e) P1和P2信号及其逻辑NOR操作的输出信号[20]
Figure 8. (a) Experimental setup of a typical all-optical switch, EDFA: erbium-doped fiber amplifier, OBF: optical bandpass filter, PD: photodiode, DSO: digital sampling oscilloscope[22]; (b) pump pulses at 1552 nm and (c) cross-absorption modulated CW signal at 1536 nm[22]; (d) operation principle and truth table of NOR gate[20]; (e) signal P1, P2 and the output cross-modulated CW probe with logic NOR operation[20].
表 1 已报道的无机半导体材料的ND-TPA系数
Table 1. Reported ND-TPA coefficients for different inorganic semiconductors.
材料 λ1/nm λ2/nm βND/(cm·GW–1) 测试条件 βD/(cm·GW–1) CdTe[34] 870 8840 ~1000 10 Hz, 30 ps ~20 ZnS[34] ~390 ~1760 ~15 1 kHz, 140 fs ~1 ZnSe[34] ~480 5600 ~270 1 kHz, 140 fs ~2 ZnO[34] 420 2000 ~40 1 kHz, 140 fs ~2.5 GaAs[34] 870 8840 ~800 10 Hz, 30 ps ~10 GaSb[39] 1720 3550 140 1 kHz, 130 fs 64[41] Cu2O[42] 800 1494 88 1 kHz, 120 fs 27 MAPbBr3[23] 577 1700 53 1 kHz, 100 fs 8[43] GaAs/Al0.32Ga0.68As QW[44] 1120 1960 ~15 82 MHz, 156 fs — WS2[45] 620 776 250 80.48 MHz, 250 fs 100 MoSe2[45] 790 1500 650 80.48 MHz, 250 fs 80—800 (BA)2(MA)3Pb4X13[46] 705 760—980 10 100 kHz, 7 fs — Si[40] 1904 1350 0.97 250 kHz, 160 fs 0.5[47] 表 2 已报道的有机荧光探针分子的ND-TPA截面
Table 2. Reported ND-TPA cross section for different organic fluorescence probe materials.
材料 λ1/nm λ2/nm σND/GM 测试条件 σD/GM 罗丹明6 G[57] 800 691 596 溶剂: 甲醇; 浓度: 16.2 mmol/L; 脉宽: 103 fs 38—150[58,59] 罗丹明 123[57] 800 660 776 溶剂: 甲醇; 浓度: 4.2 mmol/L; 脉宽: 103 fs 80[62] 香豆素6[57] 800 652 1015 溶剂: 甲醇; 浓度: 23.7 mmol/L; 脉宽: 103 fs — 香豆素343[57] 800 651 49 溶剂: 氯仿; 浓度: 27.3 mmol/L; 脉宽: 103 fs — 尼罗红[57] 800 669 3270 溶剂: 氯仿; 浓度: 0.75 mmol/L; 脉宽: 103 fs — 尼罗蓝A[57] 800 626 1407 溶剂: 氯仿; 浓度: 0.68 mmol/L; 脉宽: 103 fs — 咔唑衍生物BEMC[60] 800 650 220 溶剂: 甲醇; 浓度: 10 mmol/L; 脉宽: 140 fs 34 氨基七甲噻吩[63] 925 1020 1860 溶剂: 甲醇; 浓度: 1.3 mmol/L; 脉宽: 75 fs 940 -
[1] Franken P A, Hill A E, Peters C W, Weinreich G 1961 Phys. Rev. Lett. 7 118Google Scholar
[2] Ferrando A, Pastor J P M, Suarez I 2018 J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 9 5612Google Scholar
[3] Nozaki K, Tanabe T, Shinya A, Matsuo S, Sato T, Taniyama H, Notomi M 2010 Nat. Photonics 4 477Google Scholar
[4] Boggess A S, Moss S, Boyd I, Van Stryland E 1985 IEEE J. Quantum Electron. 21 488Google Scholar
[5] Hagan D J, van Stryland E W, Soileau M J, Wu Y Y, Guha S 1988 Opt. Lett. 13 315Google Scholar
[6] Helmchen F, Denk W 2005 Nat. Methods 2 932Google Scholar
[7] Park S H, Yang D Y, Lee K S 2009 Laser Photon. Rev. 3 1Google Scholar
[8] Gu M, Li X P, Cao Y Y 2014 Light Sci. Appl. 3 e177Google Scholar
[9] Gao D, Agayan R R, Xu H, Philbert M A, Kopelman R 2006 Nano Lett. 6 2383Google Scholar
[10] Xu G J, Ren X Y, Miao Q C, Yan M, Pan H F, Chen X L, Wu G, Wu E 2019 IEEE Photon. 31 1944Google Scholar
[11] Pattanaik H S, Reichert M, Hagan D J, Van Stryland E W 2016 Opt. Express 24 1196Google Scholar
[12] Fix B, Jaeck J, Vest B, Verdun M, Beaudoin G, Sagnes I, Pelouard J L, Haidar R 2017 Appl. Phys. Lett. 111 041102Google Scholar
[13] Fang J N, Wang Y Q, Yan M, Wu E, Huang K, Zeng H P 2020 Phys. Rev. Appl. 14 064035Google Scholar
[14] Boitier F, Dherbecourt J B, Godard A, Rosencher E 2009 Appl. Phys. Lett. 94 081112Google Scholar
[15] Apiratikul P, Murphy T E 2010 IEEE Photon. 22 212Google Scholar
[16] Mahou P, Zimmerley M, Loulier K, Matho K S, Labroille G, Morin X, Supatto W, Livet J, Debarre D, Beaurepaire E 2012 Nat. Methods 9 815Google Scholar
[17] Perillo E P, Jarrett J W, Liu Y L, Hassan A, Fernee D C, Goldak J R, Bonteanu A, Spence D J, Yeh H C, Dunn A K 2017 Light Sci. Appl. 6 e17095Google Scholar
[18] Stringari C, Abdeladim L, Malkinson G, Mahou P, Solinas X, Lamarre I, Brizion S, Galey J B, Supatto W, Legouis R, Pena A M, Beaurepaire E 2017 Sci. Rep. 7 3792Google Scholar
[19] Quentmeier S, Denicke S, Gericke K H 2009 J. Fluoresc. 19 1037Google Scholar
[20] Liang T K, Nunes L R, Tsuchiya M, Abedin K S, Miyazaki T, Van Thourhout D, Bogaerts W, Dumon P, Baets R, Tsang H K 2006 Opt. Commun. 265 171Google Scholar
[21] Shen L, Healy N, Mitchell C J, Penades J S, Nedeljkovic M, Mashanovich G Z, Peacock A C 2015 Opt. Lett. 40 2213Google Scholar
[22] Liang T K, Nunes L R, Sakamoto T, Sasagawa K, Kawanishi T, Tsuchiya M, Priem G R A, van Thourhout D, Dumon P, Baets R, Tsang H K 2005 Opt. Express 13 7298Google Scholar
[23] Wang W, Wei Q, Gong Y Y, Xing G C, Wu B, Zhou G F 2022 Adv. Opt. Mater. 10 2200400Google Scholar
[24] Pascal S, David S, Andraud C, Maury O 2021 Chem. Soc. Rev. 50 6613Google Scholar
[25] Pawlicki M, Collins H A, Denning R G, Anderson H L 2009 Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 48 3244Google Scholar
[26] Sheik-Bahae M, Hutchings D C, Hagan D J, Member, Van Stryland E W 1991 IEEE J. Quantum Electron. 27 1296Google Scholar
[27] Fishman D A, Cirloganu C M, Webster S, Padilha L A, Monroe M, Hagan D J, Van Stryland E W 2011 Nat. Photonics 5 561Google Scholar
[28] Kriso C, Stein M, Haeger T, Pourdavoud N, Gerhard M, Rahimi-Iman A, Riedl T, Koch M 2020 Opt. Lett. 45 2431Google Scholar
[29] Chen S, Zheng M L, Dong X Z, Zhao Z S, Duan X M 2013 J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 30 3117Google Scholar
[30] Said A A, Sheik-Bahae M, Hagan D J, Wei T H, Wang J, Young Y, Van Stryland E W 1992 J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 9 405
[31] Wherrett B S 1984 J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 1 67Google Scholar
[32] Rumi M, Perry J W 2010 Adv. Opt. Photonics 2 451Google Scholar
[33] Negres R A, Hales J M, Kobyakov A, Hagan D J, van Stryland E W 2002 Opt. Lett. 27 270Google Scholar
[34] Cirloganu C M, Padilha L A , Fishman D A, Webster S, Hagan D J, Van Stryland E W 2011 Opt. Express 19 22951Google Scholar
[35] Reichert M, Smirl A L, Salamo G, Hagan D J, Van Stryland E W 2016 Phys. Rev. Lett. 117 073602Google Scholar
[36] Olszak P D, Cirloganu C M, Webster S, Padilha L A, Guha S, Gonzalez L P, Krishnamurthy S, Hagan D J, Van Stryland E W 2010 Phys. Rev. B 82 235207Google Scholar
[37] Knez D, Hanninen A M, Prince R C, Potma E O, Fishman D A 2020 Light Sci. Appl. 9 125Google Scholar
[38] Bolger J A, Kar A . K, Wherrett B S 1993 Opt. Commun. 97 203Google Scholar
[39] Olson B V, Gehlsen M P, Boggess T F 2013 Opt. Commun. 304 54Google Scholar
[40] Krauss-Kodytek L, Ruppert C, Betz M 2021 Opt. Express 29 34522Google Scholar
[41] Wagner T J, Bohn M J, Coutu R A, et al. 2010 J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 27 2122Google Scholar
[42] Liang H J, Ma Q C, Liu J, Shi X W, Yang G J, Chen S, Liang E 2019 J. Nonlinear Opt. Phys. Mater. 28 1950015Google Scholar
[43] Walters G, Sutherland B R, Hoogland S, Shi D, Comin R, Sellan D P, Bakr O M, Sargent E H 2015 ACS Nano 9 9340Google Scholar
[44] Cox N, Wei J, Pattanaik H, Tabbakh T, Gorza S-P, Hagan D, Van Stryland E W 2020 Phys. Re. Res. 2 013376Google Scholar
[45] Cui Q N, Li Y Y, Chang J H, Zhao H, Xu C X 2019 Laser Photon. Rev. 13 1800225Google Scholar
[46] Grinblat G, Abdelwahab I, Nielsen M P, Dichtl P, Leng K, Oulton R F, Loh K P, Maier S A 2019 ACS Nano 13 9504Google Scholar
[47] Lin Q, Zhang J, Piredda G, Boyd R W, Fauchet P M, Agrawal G P 2007 Appl. Phys. Lett. 91 021111Google Scholar
[48] Wang G, Mei S L, Liao J F, Wang W, Tang Y X, Zhang Q, Tang Z K, Wu B, Xing G C 2021 Small 17 2100809Google Scholar
[49] Lee C, Fan H 1974 Phys. Rev. B 9 3502Google Scholar
[50] Li Y X, Dong N N, Zhang S F, Zhang X Y, Feng Y Y, Wang KP, Zhang L, Wang J 2015 Laser Photon. Rev. 9 427Google Scholar
[51] Liu W W, Xing J, Zhao J X, Wen X L, Wang K, Lu P X, Xiong Q 2017 Adv. Opt. Mater. 5 1601045Google Scholar
[52] Zhang S F, Dong N N, McEvoy N, O’Brien M, Winters S, Berner N C, Yim C Y, Li Y X, Zhang X Y, Chen Z H, Zhang L, Duesberg G S, Wang J 2015 ACS Nano 9 7142Google Scholar
[53] Yang H Z, Feng X B, Wang Q, Huang H, Chen W, Wee A T S, Ji W 2011 Nano Lett. 11 2622Google Scholar
[54] Zhou F, Abdelwahab I, Leng K, Loh K P, Ji W 2019 Adv. Mater. 31 e1904155Google Scholar
[55] Sadegh S, Yang M H, Ferri C G L, Thunemann M, Saisan P A, Devor A, Fainman Y 2019 Opt. Express 27 8335Google Scholar
[56] Sadegh S, Yang M H, Ferri C G L, Thunemann M, Saisan P A, Wei Z, Rodriguez E A, Adams S R, Kilic K, Boas D A, Sakadzic S, Devor A, Fainman Y 2019 Opt. Express 27 28022Google Scholar
[57] Xue B, Katan C, Bjorgaard J, Kobayashi T 2015 AIP Adv. 5 127138Google Scholar
[58] Xu C, Webb W W 1996 JOSA B 13 481Google Scholar
[59] Makarov N S, Drobizhev M, Rebane A 2008 Opt. Express 16 4029Google Scholar
[60] Chen S, Zheng Y C, Zheng M L, Dong X Z, Jin F, Zhao Z S, Duan X M 2017 J. Mater. Chem. C 5 470Google Scholar
[61] Elayan I A, Brown A 2023 Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. DOI: 10.1039/D3CP00723E
[62] Wolleschensky R, Feurer T, Sauerbrey R, Simon U 1998 Appl. Phys. B-Lasers O. 67 87Google Scholar
[63] Pascal S, Chi S H, Grichine A, Martel-Frachet V, Perry J W, Maury O, Andraud C 2022 Dyes Pigm. 203 110369Google Scholar
[64] Rogalski A, Martyniuk P, Kopytko M 2016 Rep. Prog. Phys. 79 046501Google Scholar
[65] Adiyan U, Larsen T, Zarate J J, Villanueva L G, Shea H 2019 Nat. Commun. 10 4518Google Scholar
[66] Korzh B, Zhao Q Y, Allmaras J P, Frasca S, Autry T M, Bersin E A, Beyer A D, Briggs R M, Bumble B, Colangelo M, Crouch G M, Dane A E, Gerrits T, Lita A E, Marsili F, Moody G, Peña C, Ramirez E, Rezac J D, Sinclair N, Stevens M J, Velasco A E, Verma V B, Wollman E E, Xie S, Zhu D, Hale P D, Spiropulu M, Silverman K L, Mirin R P, Nam S W, Kozorezov A G, Shaw M D, Berggren K K 2020 Nat. Photonics 14 250Google Scholar
[67] Hu W D, Ye Z H, Liao L, Chen H L, Chen L, Ding R J, He L, Chen X S, Lu W 2014 Opt. Lett. 39 5184Google Scholar
[68] Martyniuk P, Rogalski A 2015 Infrared Phys. Technol. 70 125Google Scholar
[69] Dam J S, Tidemand-Lichtenberg P, Pedersen C 2012 Nat. Photonics 6 788Google Scholar
[70] Kuo P S, Slattery O, Kim Y S, Pelc J S, Fejer M M, Tang X 2013 Opt. Express 21 22523Google Scholar
[71] Barh A, Rodrigo P J, Meng L, Pedersen C, Tidemand-Lichtenberg P 2019 Adv. Opt. Photon. 11 952Google Scholar
[72] Pelc J S, Ma L, Phillips C R, Zhang Q, Langrock C, Slattery O, Tang X, Fejer M M 2011 Opt. Express 19 21445Google Scholar
[73] Bristow A D, Rotenberg N, Van Driel H M 2007 Appl. Phys. Lett. 90 191104Google Scholar
[74] Denk W, Strickler J H, Webb W W 1990 Science 248 73Google Scholar
[75] Niesner R, Andresen V, Neumann J, Spiecker H, Gunzer M 2007 Biophys. J. 93 2519Google Scholar
[76] Weissleder R, Ntziachristos V 2003 Nat. Med. 9 123Google Scholar
[77] Xu H T, Chen S, Mu K J, Wang J Q, Tian Y Z, Su S L, Mao Y C, Liang E J 2018 J. Nonlinear Opt. Phys. Mater. 27 1850027Google Scholar
[78] Hales J M, Hagan D J, Van Stryland E W, Schafer K J, Morales A R, Belfield K D, Pacher P, Kwon O, Zojer E, Bredas J L 2004 J. Chem. Phys. 121 3152Google Scholar
[79] Lakowicz J R, Gryczynski I, Malak H, Gryczynski Z 1996 Photochem. Photobiol. 64 632Google Scholar
[80] Robinson T, Valluri P, Kennedy G, Sardini A, Dunsby C, Neil M A, Baldwin G S, French P M, de Mello A J 2014 Anal. Chem. 86 10732Google Scholar
[81] Quentmeier S, Denicke S, Ehlers J E, Niesner R A, Gericke K H 2008 J. Phys. Chem. B 112 5768Google Scholar
[82] Yang M H, Abashin M, Saisan P A, Tian P, Ferri C G, Devor A, Fainman Y 2016 Opt. Express 24 30173Google Scholar
[83] Cambaliza M O, Saloma C 2000 Opt. Commun. 184 25Google Scholar
[84] Ibanez-Lopez C, Escobar I, Saavedra G, Martinez-Corral M 2004 Microsc. Res. Techniq. 64 96Google Scholar
[85] Blanca C M, Saloma C 2001 Appl. Opt. 40 2722Google Scholar
[86] Lim M, Saloma C 2003 Appl. Opt. 42 3398Google Scholar
[87] Garini Y, Young I T, McNamara G 2006 Cytom. Part A 69 735
[88] Almeida V R, Barrios C A, Panepucci R R, Lipson M, Foster M A, Ouzounov D G, Gaeta A L 2004 Opt. Lett. 29 2867Google Scholar
[89] Abdalla S, Ng S, Barrios P, Celo D, Delage A, El-Mougy S, Golub I, He J J, Janz S, McKinnon R 2004 IEEE Photon. 16 1038Google Scholar
[90] Först M, Niehusmann J, Plötzing T, Bolten J, Wahlbrink T, Moormann C, Kurz H 2007 Opt. Lett. 32 2046Google Scholar
[91] Li C F, Dou N 2009 Chin. Phys. Lett. 26 054203Google Scholar
[92] Mukherjee K, Kumbhakar D 2012 Optik 123 489Google Scholar
[93] Mehta P, Healy N, Day T, Sparks J, Sazio P, Badding J, Peacock A 2011 Opt. Express 19 19078Google Scholar
[94] Yu S, Wu X, Wang Y, Guo X, Tong L 2017 Adv. Mater. 29 1606128Google Scholar
[95] Wang C, Gao L, Chen H, Xu Y, Ma C, Yao H, Song Y, Zhang H 2021 Nanophotonics 10 2617Google Scholar
[96] Chai Z, Hu X Y, Wang F F, Niu X X, Xie J Y, Gong Q H 2017 Adv. Opt. Mater. 5 1600665Google Scholar
Catalog
Metrics
- Abstract views: 5322
- PDF Downloads: 163
- Cited By: 0