-
Czochralski (CZ) silicon is a base material for manufacturing integrated circuits (ICs). The mechanical strength of CZ silicon determines the processing limitations and often dominates the issues related to packaging and failure of ICs. With the ever-smaller feature size of ICs, the scaling of device dimensions may indirectly lead to increase the stress in silicon substrate, thus increasing the probability of generating dislocations. Consequently, improving the mechanical strength of CZ silicon is of significance for increasing the manufacturing yield of ICs. In this work, we propose a strategy of co-doping germanium (Ge) impurity and nitrogen (N) impurity into CZ silicon to achieve better mechanical strength. In order to explore the feasibility of such a strategy, we comparatively investigate the room-temperature hardness and dislocation gliding behaviors in the temperature range of 600–1200 ℃ in the conventional CZ silicon, Ge-doped CZ silicon, N-doped CZ silicon, as well as N and Ge co-doped CZ silicon. The significant experimental results are described as follows. 1) Ge-doping, N-doping or co-doping of Ge and N hardly influences the hardness and therefore the dislocation gliding behavior at room temperature. 2) The suppressing effect of N-doping on the dislocation gliding is remarkable at 600–1000 ℃ and becomes weakened at the temperatures higher than 1100 ℃, while Ge-doping hardly affects the dislocation gliding at 600–900 ℃ but exhibits a strong suppressing effect on the dislocation gliding at 1000–1200 ℃. 3) Co-doping Ge and N impurities into CZ silicon can take the complementary advantages of both Ge- and N-doping to suppress the dislocation gliding at 600–1200 ℃. It is believed that N-doping can result in the formation of N-O complex-related pinning agents within the dislocation cores to suppress the dislocation gliding at 600–1000 ℃. For Ge-doping, it is supposed that Ge-O complexes acting as the pinning agents can form near the front of a single dislocation when the temperature is as high as 1000 ℃ and above. In a word, it is verified in this work that co-doping Ge and N into CZ silicon can further improve the mechanical strength at the processing temperatures of ICs fabrication.
-
Keywords:
- Czochralski slicon /
- mechanical strength /
- dislocation gliding /
- co-doping /
- germanium /
- nitrogen
[1] Hu S M, Patrick W J 1975 J. Appl. Phys. 46 1869Google Scholar
[2] Sumino K, Harada H, Yonenaga I 1980 Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 19 L49Google Scholar
[3] Yonenaga I, Sumino K, Hoshi K 1984 J. Appl. Phys. 56 2346Google Scholar
[4] Senkader S, Wilshaw P R, Gambaro D, et al. 1999 Solid State Phenom. 70 321Google Scholar
[5] Yang D R, Wang G, Xu J, et al. 2003 Microelectron. Eng. 66 345Google Scholar
[6] Zeng Z D, Chen J H, Zeng Y H, et al. 2011 J. Cryst. Growth 324 93Google Scholar
[7] Shimizu H, Aoshima T 1988 Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 27 2315Google Scholar
[8] Fischer A, Kissinger G 2007 Appl. Phys. Lett. 91 111911Google Scholar
[9] Goldstein M, Watanabe M 2008 ECS Trans. 16 313Google Scholar
[10] Fahey P M, Mader S R, Stiffler S R, et al. 1992 IBM J. Res. Dev. 36 158Google Scholar
[11] Siegelin F, Stuffer A 2005 Proceedings of the 31st International Symposium for Testing and Failure Analysis San Jose, California, USA, November 6–10, 2005 p59
[12] Yonenaga I 2005 J. Appl. Phys. 98 023517Google Scholar
[13] Lu H M, Yang D R, Li L B, et al. 1998 Phys. Status Solidi A 169 193Google Scholar
[14] Li D S, Yang D R, Que D L 1999 Physica B 273-4 553Google Scholar
[15] Orlov V, Richter H, Fischer A, et al. 2002 Mater. Sci. Semicond. Process. 5 403Google Scholar
[16] Mezhennyi M V, Mil’vidskii M G, Reznik V Y 2002 Phys. Solid State 44 1278Google Scholar
[17] Mezhennyi M V, Mil’vidskii M G, Reznik V Y 2009 J. Surf. Invest. 3 747Google Scholar
[18] Fukuda T, Ohsawa A 1992 Appl. Phys. Lett. 60 1184Google Scholar
[19] Yonenaga I 2005 Mater. Sci. Eng., B 124 293Google Scholar
[20] Chen J H, Yang D R, Ma X Y, et al. 2008 J. Appl. Phys. 103 123521Google Scholar
[21] Taishi T, Huang X M, Yonenaga I, et al. 2002 Mater. Sci. Semicond. Process. 5 409Google Scholar
[22] Schuh C A 2006 Mater. Today 9 32Google Scholar
[23] Jang J I, Lance M J, Wen S Q, et al. 2005 Acta Mater. 53 1759Google Scholar
[24] Juliano T, Gogotsi Y, Domnich V 2003 J. Mater. Res. 18 1192Google Scholar
[25] Sun Y, Zhao T, Lan W, et al. 2019 J. Mater. Sci.- Mater. Electron. 30 3114Google Scholar
[26] Kailer A, Gogotsi Y G, Nickel K G 1997 J. Appl. Phys. 81 3057Google Scholar
[27] Oliver W C, Pharr G M 1992 J. Mater. Res. 7 1564Google Scholar
[28] Imai M, Sumino K 1983 Philos. Mag. A 47 599Google Scholar
[29] Sumino K, Yonenaga I 1993 Phys. Status Solidi A 138 573Google Scholar
[30] Kolar H R, Spence J C H, Alexander H 1996 Phys. Rev. Lett. 77 4031Google Scholar
[31] Patel J R, Testardi L R, Freeland P E 1976 Phys. Rev. B 13 3548Google Scholar
[32] Suzuki T, Yonenaga I, Kirchner H O K 1995 Phys. Rev. Lett. 75 3470Google Scholar
[33] Yang D R, Ma X Y, Fan R X, et al. 2000 Mater. Sci. Eng., B 72 121Google Scholar
[34] von Ammon W, Holzl R, Virbulis J, et al. 2002 J. Cryst. Growth 240 330Google Scholar
[35] Ko ji, Sumino 1999 Metall. Mater. Trans. A 30 1465Google Scholar
[36] Itoh T, Abe T 1988 Appl. Phys. Lett. 53 39Google Scholar
[37] Yonenaga I, Taishi T, Huang X, et al. 2003 J. Appl. Phys. 93 265Google Scholar
[38] Sumino K, Yonenaga I 2002 Solid State Phenom. 85-86 145Google Scholar
[39] McVay G L, Ducharme A R 1973 J. Appl. Phys. 44 1409Google Scholar
[40] Wang L, Yang D R 2009 Physica B 404 58Google Scholar
-
图 1 (a) CZ, GCZ, NCZ, GNCZ硅单晶样品的典型纳米压痕载荷-位移(P-h)曲线; (b)各样品带有相变特征的部分载荷-位移曲线(为了可视起见, 各曲线作了平移)
Figure 1. (a) Representative P-h curves of CZ, GCZ, NCZ, GNCZ silicon specimens under nanoindentation; (b) segments of the P-h curves with features of phase transformation for CZ, GCZ, NCZ, GNCZ silicon specimens (the curves are deliberately shifted for visual discrimination).
图 3 (a) 三点弯曲加载单元的结构示意图以及加载时的载荷-位置分布关系的示意图; (b) 普通CZ硅样品在650 ℃三点弯曲加载25 min并经择优腐蚀后某一部分区域的OM照片
Figure 3. (a) Schematic diagram of three-point bending unit and the dependence of load on the position under a given loading; (b) regional OM image of the conventional CZ silicon specimen subjected to three-point bending at 650 ℃ for 25 min and subsequent preferential etching.
表 1 实验所采用的硅片中的杂质浓度
Table 1. Concentrations of impurities in the silicon wafers used.
硅片 杂质 [Ge]/(1019 cm–3) [N]/(1014 cm–3) [Oi]/(1017 cm–3) CZ — — 7.9 GCZ 2.8 — 8.1 NCZ — 9.0 8.1 GNCZ 2.0 8.1 8.0 表 2 CZ, NCZ, GCZ, GNCZ样品的位错滑移激活能
Table 2. Activation energy of dislocation gliding in CZ, NCZ, GCZ and GNCZ silicon specimens.
CZ GCZ NCZ GNCZ Q /eV 2.12 2.10 2.07 2.00 -
[1] Hu S M, Patrick W J 1975 J. Appl. Phys. 46 1869Google Scholar
[2] Sumino K, Harada H, Yonenaga I 1980 Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 19 L49Google Scholar
[3] Yonenaga I, Sumino K, Hoshi K 1984 J. Appl. Phys. 56 2346Google Scholar
[4] Senkader S, Wilshaw P R, Gambaro D, et al. 1999 Solid State Phenom. 70 321Google Scholar
[5] Yang D R, Wang G, Xu J, et al. 2003 Microelectron. Eng. 66 345Google Scholar
[6] Zeng Z D, Chen J H, Zeng Y H, et al. 2011 J. Cryst. Growth 324 93Google Scholar
[7] Shimizu H, Aoshima T 1988 Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 27 2315Google Scholar
[8] Fischer A, Kissinger G 2007 Appl. Phys. Lett. 91 111911Google Scholar
[9] Goldstein M, Watanabe M 2008 ECS Trans. 16 313Google Scholar
[10] Fahey P M, Mader S R, Stiffler S R, et al. 1992 IBM J. Res. Dev. 36 158Google Scholar
[11] Siegelin F, Stuffer A 2005 Proceedings of the 31st International Symposium for Testing and Failure Analysis San Jose, California, USA, November 6–10, 2005 p59
[12] Yonenaga I 2005 J. Appl. Phys. 98 023517Google Scholar
[13] Lu H M, Yang D R, Li L B, et al. 1998 Phys. Status Solidi A 169 193Google Scholar
[14] Li D S, Yang D R, Que D L 1999 Physica B 273-4 553Google Scholar
[15] Orlov V, Richter H, Fischer A, et al. 2002 Mater. Sci. Semicond. Process. 5 403Google Scholar
[16] Mezhennyi M V, Mil’vidskii M G, Reznik V Y 2002 Phys. Solid State 44 1278Google Scholar
[17] Mezhennyi M V, Mil’vidskii M G, Reznik V Y 2009 J. Surf. Invest. 3 747Google Scholar
[18] Fukuda T, Ohsawa A 1992 Appl. Phys. Lett. 60 1184Google Scholar
[19] Yonenaga I 2005 Mater. Sci. Eng., B 124 293Google Scholar
[20] Chen J H, Yang D R, Ma X Y, et al. 2008 J. Appl. Phys. 103 123521Google Scholar
[21] Taishi T, Huang X M, Yonenaga I, et al. 2002 Mater. Sci. Semicond. Process. 5 409Google Scholar
[22] Schuh C A 2006 Mater. Today 9 32Google Scholar
[23] Jang J I, Lance M J, Wen S Q, et al. 2005 Acta Mater. 53 1759Google Scholar
[24] Juliano T, Gogotsi Y, Domnich V 2003 J. Mater. Res. 18 1192Google Scholar
[25] Sun Y, Zhao T, Lan W, et al. 2019 J. Mater. Sci.- Mater. Electron. 30 3114Google Scholar
[26] Kailer A, Gogotsi Y G, Nickel K G 1997 J. Appl. Phys. 81 3057Google Scholar
[27] Oliver W C, Pharr G M 1992 J. Mater. Res. 7 1564Google Scholar
[28] Imai M, Sumino K 1983 Philos. Mag. A 47 599Google Scholar
[29] Sumino K, Yonenaga I 1993 Phys. Status Solidi A 138 573Google Scholar
[30] Kolar H R, Spence J C H, Alexander H 1996 Phys. Rev. Lett. 77 4031Google Scholar
[31] Patel J R, Testardi L R, Freeland P E 1976 Phys. Rev. B 13 3548Google Scholar
[32] Suzuki T, Yonenaga I, Kirchner H O K 1995 Phys. Rev. Lett. 75 3470Google Scholar
[33] Yang D R, Ma X Y, Fan R X, et al. 2000 Mater. Sci. Eng., B 72 121Google Scholar
[34] von Ammon W, Holzl R, Virbulis J, et al. 2002 J. Cryst. Growth 240 330Google Scholar
[35] Ko ji, Sumino 1999 Metall. Mater. Trans. A 30 1465Google Scholar
[36] Itoh T, Abe T 1988 Appl. Phys. Lett. 53 39Google Scholar
[37] Yonenaga I, Taishi T, Huang X, et al. 2003 J. Appl. Phys. 93 265Google Scholar
[38] Sumino K, Yonenaga I 2002 Solid State Phenom. 85-86 145Google Scholar
[39] McVay G L, Ducharme A R 1973 J. Appl. Phys. 44 1409Google Scholar
[40] Wang L, Yang D R 2009 Physica B 404 58Google Scholar
Catalog
Metrics
- Abstract views: 7484
- PDF Downloads: 123
- Cited By: 0