-
The point defect of two-dimensional hexagonal boron nitride (hBN) has recently been discovered to achieve single photon emission at room temperature, and it has become a research hotspot. Despite its important fundamental and applied research significance, the origin of the atomic structure of luminescence defects in hBN is still controversial. In this paper, first-principle calculations based on density functional theory are used to study a defect (CN)3VB in the hexagonal boron nitride monolayer (hBN) where three N atoms near the B vacancy are replaced by C atoms. At the B vacancy of hBN, the three N atoms each carry an in-plane dangling bond and the corresponding unpaired electron, and the unpaired electron can be eliminated by C substitution. We systematically study the geometric structure, electronic structure and optical properties of (CN)3VB defects, analyze the thermodynamic stability of defects through the calculation of the atomic structure, formation energy, and charge state of the defect, and analyze the position in the band gap and its atomic orbital contribution of defect state through energy band structure and wave function. We also analyze its optical properties through dielectric function and absorption coefficient, and predict its luminous photon energy. The results show that the defect can change from a symmetric metastable state to an asymmetric ground state structure with three C atoms connected together through atomic structure relaxation. The formation energy of asymmetric (CN)3VB is 7.94 eV, which is 3.72 eV lower than that of symmetric one. The formation of defects introduces some local defect states contributed by defect dangling σ bonds and reconstructed π bonds in hBN. The defects have valence states between –2 and +2, and the thermodynamic transition energy level of asymmetric (CN)3VB is higher than that of symmetric (CN)3VB. In the transition from the metastable state to the ground state, these defect states can redshift the light absorption boundary of hBN, enhance the absorption intensity of visible light by hBN, and cause internal optical transitions. Among them, there is a visible light transition with an energy threshold around 2.58 eV in the asymmetry (CN)3VB defect. Single boron atom vacancy defect and (CN)3VB have optical transitions near infrared and ultraviolet energy, respectively. The present work will help to further understand the composition and optical properties of point defects in hBN, and provide a theoretical basis for experimentally exploring the origin and properties of the atomic structure of light-emitting point defects.
[1] Lee S, Yeo J S, Ji Y, Cho C, Kim D Y, Na S I, Lee B H, Lee T 2012 Nanotechnology 23 344013Google Scholar
[2] Abderrahmane A, Ko P J, Thu T V, Ishizawa S, Takamura T, Sandhu A 2014 Nanotechnology 25 365202Google Scholar
[3] Li X, Yin J, Zhou J, Wang Q, Guo W 2014 Nanotechnology 25 105701Google Scholar
[4] Abdi M, Degenfeld-Schonburg P, Sameti M, Navarrete-Benlloch C, Hartmann M J 2016 Phys. Rev. Lett. 116 233604Google Scholar
[5] Xia F, Wang H, Xiao D, Dubey M, Ramasubramaniam A 2014 Nat. Photonics 8 899Google Scholar
[6] Clark G, Schaibley J R, Ross J, Taniguchi T, Watanabe K, Hendrickson J R, Mou S, Yao W, Xu X 2016 Nano Lett. 16 3944Google Scholar
[7] Shiue R J, Efetov D K, Grosso G, Peng C, Fong K C, Englund D 2017 Nanophotonics 6 1329Google Scholar
[8] Koenderink A F, Alu A, Polman A 2015 Science 348 516Google Scholar
[9] Caldwell J D, Aharonovich I, Cassabois G, Edgar J H, Gil B, Basov D 2019 Nat. Rev. Mater. 4 552Google Scholar
[10] Cai J, Retzker A, Jelezko F, Plenio M B 2013 Nat. Phys. 9 168Google Scholar
[11] Pla J J, Tan K Y, Dehollain J P, Lim W H, Morton J J, Jamieson D N, Dzurak A S, Morello A 2012 Nature 489 541Google Scholar
[12] Scarani V, Bechmann-Pasquinucci H, Cerf N J, Dušek M, Lütkenhaus N, Peev M 2009 Rev. Mod. Phys. 81 1301Google Scholar
[13] O’brien J L, Furusawa A, Vučković J 2009 Nat. Photonics 3 687Google Scholar
[14] Lo H K, Curty M, Tamaki K 2014 Nat. Photonics 8 595Google Scholar
[15] Cheung J, Chunnilall C, Woolliams E, Fox N, Mountford J, Wang J, Thomas P 2007 J. Mod. Opt. 54 373Google Scholar
[16] Rose B C, Huang D, Zhang Z H, Stevenson P, Tyryshkin A M, Sangtawesin S, Srinivasan S, Loudin L, Markham M L, Edmonds A M, Twitchen D J, Lyon S A, de Leon N P 2018 Science 361 60Google Scholar
[17] Chen D, Zheludev N, Gao W B 2020 Adv. Quantum Technol. 3 1900069Google Scholar
[18] Bradac C, Gao W, Forneris J, Trusheim M E, Aharonovich I 2019 Nat. Commun. 10 5625Google Scholar
[19] Tran T T, Bray K, Ford M J, Toth M, Aharonovich I 2015 Nat. Nanotechnol. 11 37Google Scholar
[20] Chakraborty C, Kinnischtzke L, Goodfellow K M, Beams R, Vamivakas A N 2015 Nat. Nanotechnol. 10 507Google Scholar
[21] He Y M, Clark G, Schaibley J R, He Y, Chen M C, Wei Y J, Ding X, Zhang Q, Yao W, Xu X 2015 Nat. Nanotechnol. 10 497Google Scholar
[22] Koperski M, Nogajewski K, Arora A, Cherkez V, Mallet P, Veuillen J Y, Marcus J, Kossacki P, Potemski M 2015 Nat. Nanotechnol. 10 503Google Scholar
[23] Kumar S, Kaczmarczyk A, Gerardot B D 2015 Nano Lett. 15 7567Google Scholar
[24] Srivastava A, Sidler M, Allain A V, Lembke D S, Kis A, Imamoglu A 2015 Nat. Nanotechnol. 10 491Google Scholar
[25] Tonndorf P, Schmidt R, Schneider R, Kern J, Buscema M, Steele G A, Castellanos-Gomez A, van der Zant H S, Vasconcellos S M, Bratschitsch R 2015 Optica 2 347Google Scholar
[26] Kern J, Niehues I, Tonndorf P, Schmidt R, Wigger D, Schneider R, Stiehm T, de Vasconcellos M S, Reiter D E, Kuhn T, Bratschitsch R 2016 Adv. Mater. 28 7101Google Scholar
[27] Liu X, Hersam M C 2019 Nat. Rev. Mater. 4 669Google Scholar
[28] Chen X, Lu X, Dubey S, Yao Q, Liu S, Wang X, Xiong Q, Zhang L, Srivastava A 2019 Nat. Phys. 15 221Google Scholar
[29] Ziegler J, Klaiss R, Blaikie A, Miller D, Horowitz V R, Alemán B J 2019 Nano Lett. 19 2121Google Scholar
[30] Chejanovsky N, Kim Y, Zappe A, Stuhlhofer B, Taniguchi T, Watanabe K, Dasari D, Finkler A, Smet J H, Wrachtrup J 2017 Sci. Rep. 7 14758Google Scholar
[31] Jungwirth N R, Calderon B, Ji Y, Spencer M G, Flatte M E, Fuchs G D 2016 Nano Lett. 16 6052Google Scholar
[32] Tran T T, Elbadawi C, Totonjian D, Lobo C J, Grosso G, Moon H, Englund D R, Ford M J, Aharonovich I, Toth M 2016 ACS Nano 10 7331Google Scholar
[33] Dietrich A, Burk M, Steiger E S, Antoniuk L, Tran T T, Nguyen M, Aharonovich I, Jelezko F, Kubanek A 2018 Phys. Rev. B 98 081414Google Scholar
[34] Meyer J C, Chuvilin A, Algara-Siller G, Biskupek J, Kaiser U 2009 Nano Lett. 9 2683Google Scholar
[35] Alem N, Erni R, Kisielowski C, Rossell M D, Gannett W, Zettl A 2009 Phys. Rev. B 80 155425Google Scholar
[36] Watanabe K, Taniguchi T, Kanda H 2004 Nat. Mater. 3 404Google Scholar
[37] Kubota Y, Watanabe K, Tsuda O, Taniguchi T 2007 Science 317 932Google Scholar
[38] Silly M, Jaffrennou P, Barjon J, Lauret J S, Ducastelle F, Loiseau A, Obraztsova E, Attal-Tretout B, Rosencher E 2007 Phys. Rev. B 75 085205Google Scholar
[39] Museur L, Feldbach E, Kanaev A 2008 Phys. Rev. B 78 155204Google Scholar
[40] Park H, Wadehra A, Wilkins J W, Castro Neto A H 2012 Appl. Phys. Lett. 100 253115Google Scholar
[41] Weston L, Wickramaratne D, Mackoit M, Alkauskas A, van de Walle C G 2018 Phys. Rev. B 97 214104Google Scholar
[42] Wang Y, Meng J, Tian Y, Chen Y, Wang G, Yin Z, Jin P, You J, Wu J, Zhang X 2020 ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 12 27361Google Scholar
[43] Mendelson N, Chugh D, Reimers J R, Cheng T S, Gottscholl A, Long H, Mellor C J, Zettl A, Dyakonov V, Beton P H, Novikov S V, Jagadish C, Tan H H, Ford M J, Toth M, Bradac C, Aharonovich I 2020 Nat. Mater. DOI: 10.1038/s41563-020-00850-y
[44] Koperski M, Vaclavkova D, Watanabe K, Taniguchi T, Novoselov K S, Potemski M 2020 PNAS 117 13214Google Scholar
[45] Kresse G, Kurthmuler J 1996 Comput. Mater. Sci. 6 15Google Scholar
[46] Kresse G, Hafner J 1994 Phy. Rev. B 49 14251Google Scholar
[47] Kresse G, Joubert D 1999 Phys. Rev. B 59 1758Google Scholar
[48] Perdew J P, Burke K, Ernzerhof M 1996 Phys. Rev. Lett. 77 3865Google Scholar
[49] Wei S H 2004 Comput. Mater. Sci. 30 337Google Scholar
[50] Huang B, Lee H 2012 Phys. Rev. B 86 245406Google Scholar
[51] Wickramaratne D, Shen J X, Dreyer C E, Alkauskas A, van de Walle C G 2019 Phys. Rev. B 99 205202Google Scholar
[52] Shi Y, Hamsen C, Jia X, Kim K K, Reina A, Hofmann M, Hsu A L, Zhang K, Li H, Juang Z Y, Dresselhaus M S, Li L J, Kong J 2010 Nano Lett. 10 4134Google Scholar
[53] Song L, Ci L, Lu H, Sorokin P B, Jin C, Ni J, Kvashnin A G, Kvashnin D G, Lou J, Yakobson B I, Ajayan P M 2010 Nano Lett. 10 3209Google Scholar
-
图 1 本征hBN单层 (a) hBN的俯视图和侧视图; (b) 模拟的hBN单层表面STM形貌, 加载电压为–2 V, 探针与原子表面的距离为0.479564 nm; (c) hBN的能带投影图
Figure 1. Intrinsic hBN monolayer: (a) Top view and side view of hBN; (b) the simulated hBN single-layer surface STM morphology, loading voltage is –2 V, the distance between probe and atomic surface is 0.479564 nm; (c) energy band projection view of hBN.
图 2 VB和as-VB的电子结构 (a), (c)分别为VB和as-VB优化后的局部结构俯视图; (b), (d)分别为VB和as-VB的能带投影图; (e), (f)分别为VB和as-VB的缺陷能级在Γ点处波函数的俯视图和自旋电荷密度图
Figure 2. Electronic structure of VB and as-VB: (a), (c) The top views of the optimized partial structure of VB and as-VB, respectively; (b), (d) the energy band projection diagrams of VB and as-VB, respectively; (e), (f) the top view of the Γ-point wave functions of the defect levels and spin charge density of VB and as-VB, respectively.
图 3 VB在不同价态的电子结构图 (a)−(c)分别为
$ {\rm{V}}_{\rm{B}}^{-1} $ ,$ {\rm{V}}_{\rm{B}}^{-2} $ ,$ {\rm{V}}_{\rm{B}}^{-3} $ 优化后的局部结构俯视图; (d)−(f)分别为$ {\rm{V}}_{\rm{B}}^{-1} $ ,$ {\rm{V}}_{\rm{B}}^{-2} $ ,${\rm{V}}_{\rm{B}}^{-3}$ 的能带投影图Figure 3. Electronic structure diagrams of VB in different valence states: (a)−(c) The top views of the optimized partial structure diagrams of
$ {\rm{V}}_{\rm{B}}^{-1} $ ,$ {\rm{V}}_{\rm{B}}^{-2} $ , and$ {\rm{V}}_{\rm{B}}^{-3} $ , respectively; (d)−(f) the energy band projection diagrams of$ {\rm{V}}_{\rm{B}}^{-1} $ ,$ {\rm{V}}_{\rm{B}}^{-2} $ , and$ {\rm{V}}_{\rm{B}}^{-3} $ , respectively.图 5 (CN)3VB和as-(CN)3VB的电子结构 (a), (c)分别为(CN)3VB, as-(CN)3VB优化后局部结构的俯视图; (b), (d)分别为(CN)3VB, as-(CN)3VB的能带投影图; (e) (CN)3VB缺陷能级在Γ点处的波函数图和自旋电荷密度图; (f) as-(CN)3VB缺陷能级在Γ点处的波函数图
Figure 5. Electronic structure of (CN)3VB and as-(CN)3VB: (a), (c) The top views of the optimized partial structure of (CN)3VB and as-(CN)3VB; (b), (d) the energy band projection diagrams of (CN)3VB and as-(CN)3VB; (e) the top view of the Γ-point wave functions of the defect levels and spin charge density of (CN)3VB; (f) the top view of the Γ-point wave functions of the defect levels of as-(CN)3VB.
图 6 (CN)3VB不同价态优化后的局部结构和能带投影图 (a)−(d)分别为(CN)3
$ {\rm{V}}_{\rm{B}}^{-1} $ , (CN)3$ {\rm{V}}_{\rm{B}}^{-2} $ , (CN)3$ {\rm{V}}_{\rm{B}}^{+1} $ , (CN)3$ {\rm{V}}_{\rm{B}}^{+2} $ 优化后的局部结构图; (e)−(h)分别为(CN)3$ {\rm{V}}_{\rm{B}}^{-1} $ , (CN)3$ {\rm{V}}_{\rm{B}}^{-2} $ , (CN)3$ {\rm{V}}_{\rm{B}}^{+1} $ , (CN)3$ {\rm{V}}_{\rm{B}}^{+2} $ 的能带投影图Figure 6. Local structure and energy band projection diagram of (CN)3VB after optimization of different valence states: (a)−(d) The top views of the optimized partial structure diagrams of (CN)3
$ {\rm{V}}_{\rm{B}}^{-1} $ , (CN)3$ {\rm{V}}_{\rm{B}}^{-2} $ , (CN)3$ {\rm{V}}_{\rm{B}}^{+1} $ , (CN)3$ {\rm{V}}_{\rm{B}}^{+2} $ ; (e)−(h) the energy band projection diagrams of (CN)3$ {\rm{V}}_{\rm{B}}^{-1} $ , (CN)3$ {\rm{V}}_{\rm{B}}^{-2} $ , (CN)3$ {\rm{V}}_{\rm{B}}^{+1} $ , (CN)3$ {\rm{V}}_{\rm{B}}^{+2} $ .图 7 as-(CN)3VB不同价态优化后的局部结构和能带投影图 (a)−(d)分别为as-(CN)3
$ {\rm{V}}_{\rm{B}}^{-1} $ , as-(CN)3$ {\rm{V}}_{\rm{B}}^{-2} $ , as-(CN)3$ {\rm{V}}_{\rm{B}}^{+1} $ , as-(CN)3$ {\rm{V}}_{\rm{B}}^{+2} $ 优化后的局部结构图; (e)−(h)分别为as-(CN)3$ {\rm{V}}_{\rm{B}}^{-1} $ , as-(CN)3$ {\rm{V}}_{\rm{B}}^{-2} $ , as-(CN)3$ {\rm{V}}_{\rm{B}}^{+1} $ , as-(CN)3$ {\rm{V}}_{\rm{B}}^{+2} $ 的能带投影图Figure 7. Electronic structure diagrams of as-(CN)3VB in different valence states: (a)−(d) The top views of the optimized partial structure diagrams of as-(CN)3
$ {\rm{V}}_{\rm{B}}^{-1} $ , as-(CN)3$ {\rm{V}}_{\rm{B}}^{-2} $ , as-(CN)3$ {\rm{V}}_{\rm{B}}^{+1} $ , as-(CN)3$ {\rm{V}}_{\rm{B}}^{+2} $ ; (e)−(h) the energy band projection diagrams of as-(CN)3$ {\rm{V}}_{\rm{B}}^{-1} $ , as-(CN)3$ {\rm{V}}_{\rm{B}}^{-2} $ , as-(CN)3$ {\rm{V}}_{\rm{B}}^{+1} $ , as-(CN)3$ {\rm{V}}_{\rm{B}}^{+2} $ .图 13 hBN单层硼原子空位的模型图 (a), (d)分别为VB和as-VB优化后的局部结构图; (b), (e)分别为VB和as-VB的电子结构模拟图, 黑色箭头和灰色箭头分别代表占据态和未占据态; (c), (f)分别为VB和as-VB的介电虚部在X和Y方向张量
Figure 13. Model diagram of boron vacancies in hBN monolayer: (a), (d) The optimized local structure diagrams of VB and as-VB; (b), (e) simulated electronic structures diagrams of VB and as-VB, where black and grey arrows indicate occupied and unoccupied states; (c), (f) the tensors of the dielectric imaginary part of VB and as-VB in the X and Y directions.
图 14 hBN单层碳掺杂的模型图 (a), (d) (CN)3VB和as-(CN)3VB优化后的局部结构图; (b), (e) (CN)3VB和as-(CN)3VB的电子结构模拟图, 黑色箭头和灰色箭头分别代表占据态和未占据态; (c), (f) (CN)3VB和as-(CN)3VB的介电虚部在X和Y方向张量
Figure 14. Model diagram of carbon doping in hBN monolayer: (a), (d) The optimized local structure diagrams of (CN)3VB and as-(CN)3VB; (b), (e) simulated electronic structures diagrams of (CN)3VB and as-(CN)3VB, where black and grey arrows indicate occupied and unoccupied states; (c), (f) the tensors of the dielectric imaginary part of (CN)3VB and as-(CN)3VB in the X and Y directions.
-
[1] Lee S, Yeo J S, Ji Y, Cho C, Kim D Y, Na S I, Lee B H, Lee T 2012 Nanotechnology 23 344013Google Scholar
[2] Abderrahmane A, Ko P J, Thu T V, Ishizawa S, Takamura T, Sandhu A 2014 Nanotechnology 25 365202Google Scholar
[3] Li X, Yin J, Zhou J, Wang Q, Guo W 2014 Nanotechnology 25 105701Google Scholar
[4] Abdi M, Degenfeld-Schonburg P, Sameti M, Navarrete-Benlloch C, Hartmann M J 2016 Phys. Rev. Lett. 116 233604Google Scholar
[5] Xia F, Wang H, Xiao D, Dubey M, Ramasubramaniam A 2014 Nat. Photonics 8 899Google Scholar
[6] Clark G, Schaibley J R, Ross J, Taniguchi T, Watanabe K, Hendrickson J R, Mou S, Yao W, Xu X 2016 Nano Lett. 16 3944Google Scholar
[7] Shiue R J, Efetov D K, Grosso G, Peng C, Fong K C, Englund D 2017 Nanophotonics 6 1329Google Scholar
[8] Koenderink A F, Alu A, Polman A 2015 Science 348 516Google Scholar
[9] Caldwell J D, Aharonovich I, Cassabois G, Edgar J H, Gil B, Basov D 2019 Nat. Rev. Mater. 4 552Google Scholar
[10] Cai J, Retzker A, Jelezko F, Plenio M B 2013 Nat. Phys. 9 168Google Scholar
[11] Pla J J, Tan K Y, Dehollain J P, Lim W H, Morton J J, Jamieson D N, Dzurak A S, Morello A 2012 Nature 489 541Google Scholar
[12] Scarani V, Bechmann-Pasquinucci H, Cerf N J, Dušek M, Lütkenhaus N, Peev M 2009 Rev. Mod. Phys. 81 1301Google Scholar
[13] O’brien J L, Furusawa A, Vučković J 2009 Nat. Photonics 3 687Google Scholar
[14] Lo H K, Curty M, Tamaki K 2014 Nat. Photonics 8 595Google Scholar
[15] Cheung J, Chunnilall C, Woolliams E, Fox N, Mountford J, Wang J, Thomas P 2007 J. Mod. Opt. 54 373Google Scholar
[16] Rose B C, Huang D, Zhang Z H, Stevenson P, Tyryshkin A M, Sangtawesin S, Srinivasan S, Loudin L, Markham M L, Edmonds A M, Twitchen D J, Lyon S A, de Leon N P 2018 Science 361 60Google Scholar
[17] Chen D, Zheludev N, Gao W B 2020 Adv. Quantum Technol. 3 1900069Google Scholar
[18] Bradac C, Gao W, Forneris J, Trusheim M E, Aharonovich I 2019 Nat. Commun. 10 5625Google Scholar
[19] Tran T T, Bray K, Ford M J, Toth M, Aharonovich I 2015 Nat. Nanotechnol. 11 37Google Scholar
[20] Chakraborty C, Kinnischtzke L, Goodfellow K M, Beams R, Vamivakas A N 2015 Nat. Nanotechnol. 10 507Google Scholar
[21] He Y M, Clark G, Schaibley J R, He Y, Chen M C, Wei Y J, Ding X, Zhang Q, Yao W, Xu X 2015 Nat. Nanotechnol. 10 497Google Scholar
[22] Koperski M, Nogajewski K, Arora A, Cherkez V, Mallet P, Veuillen J Y, Marcus J, Kossacki P, Potemski M 2015 Nat. Nanotechnol. 10 503Google Scholar
[23] Kumar S, Kaczmarczyk A, Gerardot B D 2015 Nano Lett. 15 7567Google Scholar
[24] Srivastava A, Sidler M, Allain A V, Lembke D S, Kis A, Imamoglu A 2015 Nat. Nanotechnol. 10 491Google Scholar
[25] Tonndorf P, Schmidt R, Schneider R, Kern J, Buscema M, Steele G A, Castellanos-Gomez A, van der Zant H S, Vasconcellos S M, Bratschitsch R 2015 Optica 2 347Google Scholar
[26] Kern J, Niehues I, Tonndorf P, Schmidt R, Wigger D, Schneider R, Stiehm T, de Vasconcellos M S, Reiter D E, Kuhn T, Bratschitsch R 2016 Adv. Mater. 28 7101Google Scholar
[27] Liu X, Hersam M C 2019 Nat. Rev. Mater. 4 669Google Scholar
[28] Chen X, Lu X, Dubey S, Yao Q, Liu S, Wang X, Xiong Q, Zhang L, Srivastava A 2019 Nat. Phys. 15 221Google Scholar
[29] Ziegler J, Klaiss R, Blaikie A, Miller D, Horowitz V R, Alemán B J 2019 Nano Lett. 19 2121Google Scholar
[30] Chejanovsky N, Kim Y, Zappe A, Stuhlhofer B, Taniguchi T, Watanabe K, Dasari D, Finkler A, Smet J H, Wrachtrup J 2017 Sci. Rep. 7 14758Google Scholar
[31] Jungwirth N R, Calderon B, Ji Y, Spencer M G, Flatte M E, Fuchs G D 2016 Nano Lett. 16 6052Google Scholar
[32] Tran T T, Elbadawi C, Totonjian D, Lobo C J, Grosso G, Moon H, Englund D R, Ford M J, Aharonovich I, Toth M 2016 ACS Nano 10 7331Google Scholar
[33] Dietrich A, Burk M, Steiger E S, Antoniuk L, Tran T T, Nguyen M, Aharonovich I, Jelezko F, Kubanek A 2018 Phys. Rev. B 98 081414Google Scholar
[34] Meyer J C, Chuvilin A, Algara-Siller G, Biskupek J, Kaiser U 2009 Nano Lett. 9 2683Google Scholar
[35] Alem N, Erni R, Kisielowski C, Rossell M D, Gannett W, Zettl A 2009 Phys. Rev. B 80 155425Google Scholar
[36] Watanabe K, Taniguchi T, Kanda H 2004 Nat. Mater. 3 404Google Scholar
[37] Kubota Y, Watanabe K, Tsuda O, Taniguchi T 2007 Science 317 932Google Scholar
[38] Silly M, Jaffrennou P, Barjon J, Lauret J S, Ducastelle F, Loiseau A, Obraztsova E, Attal-Tretout B, Rosencher E 2007 Phys. Rev. B 75 085205Google Scholar
[39] Museur L, Feldbach E, Kanaev A 2008 Phys. Rev. B 78 155204Google Scholar
[40] Park H, Wadehra A, Wilkins J W, Castro Neto A H 2012 Appl. Phys. Lett. 100 253115Google Scholar
[41] Weston L, Wickramaratne D, Mackoit M, Alkauskas A, van de Walle C G 2018 Phys. Rev. B 97 214104Google Scholar
[42] Wang Y, Meng J, Tian Y, Chen Y, Wang G, Yin Z, Jin P, You J, Wu J, Zhang X 2020 ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 12 27361Google Scholar
[43] Mendelson N, Chugh D, Reimers J R, Cheng T S, Gottscholl A, Long H, Mellor C J, Zettl A, Dyakonov V, Beton P H, Novikov S V, Jagadish C, Tan H H, Ford M J, Toth M, Bradac C, Aharonovich I 2020 Nat. Mater. DOI: 10.1038/s41563-020-00850-y
[44] Koperski M, Vaclavkova D, Watanabe K, Taniguchi T, Novoselov K S, Potemski M 2020 PNAS 117 13214Google Scholar
[45] Kresse G, Kurthmuler J 1996 Comput. Mater. Sci. 6 15Google Scholar
[46] Kresse G, Hafner J 1994 Phy. Rev. B 49 14251Google Scholar
[47] Kresse G, Joubert D 1999 Phys. Rev. B 59 1758Google Scholar
[48] Perdew J P, Burke K, Ernzerhof M 1996 Phys. Rev. Lett. 77 3865Google Scholar
[49] Wei S H 2004 Comput. Mater. Sci. 30 337Google Scholar
[50] Huang B, Lee H 2012 Phys. Rev. B 86 245406Google Scholar
[51] Wickramaratne D, Shen J X, Dreyer C E, Alkauskas A, van de Walle C G 2019 Phys. Rev. B 99 205202Google Scholar
[52] Shi Y, Hamsen C, Jia X, Kim K K, Reina A, Hofmann M, Hsu A L, Zhang K, Li H, Juang Z Y, Dresselhaus M S, Li L J, Kong J 2010 Nano Lett. 10 4134Google Scholar
[53] Song L, Ci L, Lu H, Sorokin P B, Jin C, Ni J, Kvashnin A G, Kvashnin D G, Lou J, Yakobson B I, Ajayan P M 2010 Nano Lett. 10 3209Google Scholar
Catalog
Metrics
- Abstract views: 7928
- PDF Downloads: 181
- Cited By: 0