Simulation research on formation and compressive properties of aluminum nanowires inside carbon nanotubes and boron-nitride nanotubes

Yuan Jian-Hui; Lei Qin-Wen; Liu Qi-Cheng

doi:10.7498/aps.68.20190137

Abstract

To know the basic configuration and application characteristics of aluminum (Al) nanostructure, the structure performances of carbon nanotube (CNT) and boron-nitride NT (BNNT) filled with Al atoms are studied through molecular dynamics. Optimization results show that the Al atoms in the tube are arranged neatly into various shapes of nanowires. A bunch of one-dimensional (1D) Al nanowires (AlNWs) is formed in (5, 5) CNT and BNNT, and large beams of AlNWs are formed in (10, 10) NT, including 11 beams of 1D AlNWs with highly axial symmetry in (10, 10) CNT and 5 beams of spiral AlNWs in BNNT (10, 10). Further data analysis for radical distribution function (RDF) shows that AlNWs inside CNT have larger atomic distribution density, but those inside BNNT with larger diameter have better crystallinity than those with similar size inside the CNT. These results can provide a method of designing the nanowires with different structures and shapes in different micro-nano devices (such as nanospring, nanosolenoid, and others). Comparison of the axial compression behaviors of the composite NTs and their energy analysis reveal that the critical buckling strain of AlNW@CNT is significantly larger than that of AlNW@BNNT. For the same type of compound structure, the buckling strain decreases with NT diameter increasing. Therefore, smaller AlNW@CNT has stronger axial compressive resistance. The main reasons are as follows: 1) The AlNW in carbon NTs has a relatively large Al atomic distribution in the axial direction, which is conducive to the formation of σ bond to increase structural stability and mechanical performance. It also plays a decisive role in enhancing compressive performance. 2) The AlNW in the large-diameter boron nitride NTs is helical in shape, and more Al atoms are distributed in the direction of the cross section, thereby relatively reducing the number of axial pressure-bearing atoms. In addition, for the same type of nanotube, a tube with a small diameter results in closer hexagons to the tube wall and larger interaction. These conditions are more conducive to resisting the transverse subsidence under axial pressure. The energy analysis results indicate that the van der Waals force is one of the main causes for NT composite stability and increasing compressive strength. These results can provide a reference for selecting different Al nanowire-reinforced composite structures under different application conditions, such as high temperature, high pressure, oxidation resistance, and others.

Keywords:

aluminum nanowires /
carbon nanotube and boron-nitride nanotube /
molecular dynamics /
compressing property

Authors and contacts

Hunan Provincial Key Laboratory of Flexible Electronic Materials Genome Engineering, School of Physics and Electronic Science, Changsha University of Science and Technology, Changsha 410114, China

Corresponding author: Yuan Jian-Hui, wdxyjh@163.com ; Liu Qi-Cheng, 743542590@qq.com

Funds: Project supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 61771076, 21276028, 21506259).

FullText HTML

References

[1]	Zhang J M, Wang S F, Xu K W, Ji V 2010 J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. 10 840 Google Scholar
[2]	Arcidiacono S, Walther J H, Poulikakos D, Passerone D, Koumoutsakos P 2005 Phys. Rev. Lett. 94 105502 Google Scholar
[3]	Hudziak S, Darfeuille A, Zhang R, Peijs T, Mountjoy G, Bertoni G, Baxendale M 2010 Nanotechnology 21 125505 Google Scholar
[4]	Zhao D L, Zhang J M, Li X, Shen Z M 2010 J. Alloys Compd. 505 712 Google Scholar
[5]	Xiao J, Ryu S Y, Huang Y, Hwang K C, Paik U, Rogers J A 2010 Nanotechnology 21 085708 Google Scholar
[6]	Wang L, Zhang H W, Zhang Z Q, Zheng Y G, Wang J B 2007 Appl. Phys. Lett. 91 051122 Google Scholar
[7]	Soldano G, Mariscal M M 2009 Nanotechnology 20 165705 Google Scholar
[8]	Guo S H, Zhu B E, Ou X D, Pan Z Y, Wang Y X 2010 Carbon 48 4129 Google Scholar
[9]	Zhang X Q, Li H, Liew K M 2007 J. Appl. Phys. 102 073709 Google Scholar
[10]	Nishio K, Ozaki T, Morishita T, Mikami M 2008 Phys. Rev. B 77 201401 Google Scholar
[11]	Lü Z Y, Hu Q K, Xu Z X, Wang J J, Chen Z H, Wang Y, Chen M, Zhou K, Zhou Y, Han S T 2019 Adv. Electron. Mater. 5 1800793 Google Scholar
[12]	Cui Z, Han Y W, Huang Q J, Dong J Y, Zhu Y 2018 Nanoscale 10 6806 Google Scholar
[13]	王文慧, 张孬 2018 67 247302 Google Scholar Wang W H, Zhang N 2018 Acta Phys. Sin. 67 247302 Google Scholar
[14]	Chen R, Hochbaum A I, Murphy P, Moore J, Yang P D, Majumdar A 2008 Phys. Rev. Lett. 101 105501 Google Scholar
[15]	Wu Z G, Neaton J B, Grossman J C 2008 Phys. Rev. Lett. 100 246804 Google Scholar
[16]	Blasé X, Fernandez-Serra M V 2008 Phys. Rev. Lett. 100 046802 Google Scholar
[17]	Durgun E, Cakir D, Akman N, Ciraci S 2007 Phys. Rev. Lett. 99 256806 Google Scholar
[18]	Leu P W, Svizhenko A, Cho K 2008 Phys. Rev. B 77 235305 Google Scholar
[19]	Sorokin P B, Avramov P V, Kvashnin A G, Kvashnin D G, Ovchinnikov S G, Fedorov A S 2008 Phys. Rev. B 77 235417 Google Scholar
[20]	鹿业波, 顾金梅, 刘楚辉, 彭文利 2016 半导体光电 37 370 Lu Y B, Gu J M, Liu C H, Peng W L 2016 Semicond. Optoelectron. 37 370
[21]	Hu L, Wu H, Cui Y 2011 MRS Bull. 36 760 Google Scholar
[22]	Cho Y J, Park I J, Lee H J, Kim J G 2015 J. Power Sources 277 370 Google Scholar
[23]	Lin M C, Gong M, Lu B, Wu Y, Wang D Y, Guan M, Angell M, Chen C, Yang J, Hwang B J, Dai H 2015 Nature 520 324 Google Scholar
[24]	Li S, Niu J, Zhao Y C, So K P, Wang C, Wang C A, Li J 2015 Nat. Commun. 6 7872 Google Scholar
[25]	Ju S, Li J, Liu J, Chen P C, Ha Y G, Ishikawa F, Chang H, Zhou C, Facchetti A, Janes D B, Marks T J 2008 Nano Lett. 8 997 Google Scholar
[26]	Fu K K, Wang Z, Dai J, Carter M, Hu L 2016 Chem. Mater. 28 3527 Google Scholar
[27]	Shaijumon M M, Perre E, Daffos B, Taberna P L, Tarascon J M, Simon P 2010 Adv. Mater. 22 4978 Google Scholar
[28]	Das A, Ronen Y, Most Y, Oreg Y, Heiblum M, Shtrikman H 2012 Nat. Phys. 8 887 Google Scholar
[29]	Li L, Xu X, Chew H, Huang X, Dou X, Pan S, Li G, Zhang L 2008 J. Phys. Chem. C 112 5328 Google Scholar
[30]	Lu Y, Tohmyoh H, Saka M 2012 Thin Solid Films 520 3448 Google Scholar
[31]	Sun Y X, Tohmoh H, Saka M 2009 J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. 9 1972 Google Scholar
[32]	Wang H, Li B 2018 J. Electrochem. Soc. 165 D641 Google Scholar
[33]	Chen Y, Wang Y, Zhu S, Chen C, Danner V A, Li Y, Dai J, Li H, Fu K K, Li T, Liu Y, Hu L 2019 ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 11 6009 Google Scholar
[34]	Azuma K, Sakajiri K, Okabe T, Matsumoto H, Kang S, Watanabe J, Tokita M 2017 Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 56 095002 Google Scholar
[35]	Chen Y, Zou J, Campbell S J, Le Caer G 2004 Appl. Phys. Lett. 84 2430 Google Scholar
[36]	Yuan J H, Liew K M 2009 Carbon 47 713 Google Scholar
[37]	Yuan J H, Liew K M 2009 Carbon 47 1526 Google Scholar
[38]	Jing L, Tay R Y, Li H L, Tsang S H, Huang J F, Tan D L, Zhang B W, Teo E H T, Tok A I Y 2016 Nanoscale 8 11114 Google Scholar
[39]	Xu F F, Bando Y, Golberg D, Hasegawa M, Mitome M 2004 Acta Mater. 52 601 Google Scholar
[40]	Golberg D, Bando Y, Mitome M, Fushimi K, Tang C C 2004 Acta Mater. 52 3295 Google Scholar
[41]	Ashrafi B, Jakubinek M B, Martinez-Rubi Y, Rahmat M, Djokic D, Laqua K, Park D, Kim K S, Simard B, Yousefpour A 2017 Acta Astronaut. 141 57 Google Scholar
[42]	Xu X J G, Gilburd L, Bando Y, Golberg D, Walker G C 2016 J. Phys. Chem. C 120 1945 Google Scholar
[43]	Tokoro H, Fujii S, Oku T 2005 Solid State Commun. 133 681 Google Scholar
[44]	Yuan J H, Liew K M 2010 J. Comput. Theor. Nanosci. 7 1878 Google Scholar
[45]	Kumar S, Srivastava V C, Mandal G K, Pattanayek S K, Sahoo K L 2017 J. Phys. Chem. C 121 20468 Google Scholar
[46]	袁剑辉, 黄维辉, 史向华, 杨昌虎 2013 稀有金属材料与工程 42 297 Google Scholar Yuan J H, Huang W H, Shi X H, Yang C H 2013 Rare Metal. Mat. Eng. 42 297 Google Scholar
[47]	袁剑辉, 黄维辉, 史向华, 张振华 2012 无机化学学报 28 125 Yuan J H, Huang W H, Shi X H, Zhang Z H 2012 Chin. J. Inorg. Chem. 28 125
[48]	Yuan J H, Liew K M 2011 J. Phys. Chem. C 115 431 Google Scholar
[49]	Yuan J H, Liew K M 2011 Nanotechnology 22 085701 Google Scholar
[50]	Yuan J H, Liew K M 2011 Carbon 49 677 Google Scholar
[51]	Yuan J H, Zhang L W, Liew K M 2017 Computat. Mater. Sci. 133 130 Google Scholar
[52]	Yuan J H, Zhang L W, Liew K M 2016 Current Nanosci. 12 636 Google Scholar
[53]	Yuan J H, Zhang L W, Liew K M 2015 RSC Adv. 5 74399 Google Scholar
[54]	Yuan J H, Liew K M 2014 Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 16 88 Google Scholar
[55]	Rappe A K, Casewit C J, Colwell K S, Goddard W A, Skiff W M 1992 J. Am. Chem. Soc. 114 10024 Google Scholar
[56]	Rappe A K, Colwell K S, Casewit C 1993 J. Inorg. Chem. 32 3438 Google Scholar
[57]	Srivastava D, Menon M, Cho K 1999 J. Phys. Rev. Lett. 83 2973 Google Scholar
[58]	Casewit C, J, Colwell K S, Rappe A K 1992 J. Am. Chem. Soc. 114 10046 Google Scholar

Cited By

图 1 铝原子在CNT (n, n)和BNNT (n, n)纳米管内微结构演变模型　(a) CNT (5, 5)和CNT (10, 10); (b) BNNT (5, 5)和BNNT (10, 10)

Figure 1. Models of the microstructure evolution of the aluminum atoms filled in CNT (n, n) and BNNT (n, n) nanotubes: (a) CNT (5, 5) and CNT (10, 10); (b) BNNT (5, 5) and BNNT (10, 10).

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

图 2 优化后的AlNW@CNT和AlNW@BNNT复合结构　(a) AlNW@CNT (5, 5); (b) AlNW@BNNT (5, 5); (c) AlNW@CNT (10, 10); (d) AlNW@BNNT (10, 10)

Figure 2. Structure of the optimized AlNW@CNT and AlNW@BNNT: (a) AlNW@CNT (5, 5); (b) AlNW@BNNT (5, 5); (c) AlNW@CNT (10, 10); (d) AlNW@BNNT (10, 10).

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

图 3 在CNT (n, n)与BNNT (n, n)中AlNW的RDF　(a) n = 5; (b) n = 10

Figure 3. RDF of AlNW in CNT (n, n) and BNNT (n, n): (a) n = 5; (b) n = 10.

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

图 4 屈曲前后的(a) AlNW@CNT (5, 5)与(b) AlNW@ BNNT (5, 5)结构

Figure 4. (a) AlNW@CNT (5, 5) and (b) AlNW@BNNT (5, 5) nanotubes before and after buckling

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

图 5 屈曲前后的(a) AlNW@CNT (10, 10)与(b) AlNW@ BNNT (10, 10)结构

Figure 5. (a) AlNW@CNT (10, 10) and (b) AlNW@BNNT (10, 10) nanotubes before and after buckling.

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

图 6 　(a) AlNW@CNT (10, 10)与 (b) AlNW@BNNT (10, 10)的能量与压缩应变ε的关系

Figure 6. Energy of a (a) AlNW@CNT (10, 10) and (b) AlNW@BNNT (10, 10) as a function of the compression strain.

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

map

[1]	Zhang J M, Wang S F, Xu K W, Ji V 2010 J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. 10 840 Google Scholar
[2]	Arcidiacono S, Walther J H, Poulikakos D, Passerone D, Koumoutsakos P 2005 Phys. Rev. Lett. 94 105502 Google Scholar
[3]	Hudziak S, Darfeuille A, Zhang R, Peijs T, Mountjoy G, Bertoni G, Baxendale M 2010 Nanotechnology 21 125505 Google Scholar
[4]	Zhao D L, Zhang J M, Li X, Shen Z M 2010 J. Alloys Compd. 505 712 Google Scholar
[5]	Xiao J, Ryu S Y, Huang Y, Hwang K C, Paik U, Rogers J A 2010 Nanotechnology 21 085708 Google Scholar
[6]	Wang L, Zhang H W, Zhang Z Q, Zheng Y G, Wang J B 2007 Appl. Phys. Lett. 91 051122 Google Scholar
[7]	Soldano G, Mariscal M M 2009 Nanotechnology 20 165705 Google Scholar
[8]	Guo S H, Zhu B E, Ou X D, Pan Z Y, Wang Y X 2010 Carbon 48 4129 Google Scholar
[9]	Zhang X Q, Li H, Liew K M 2007 J. Appl. Phys. 102 073709 Google Scholar
[10]	Nishio K, Ozaki T, Morishita T, Mikami M 2008 Phys. Rev. B 77 201401 Google Scholar
[11]	Lü Z Y, Hu Q K, Xu Z X, Wang J J, Chen Z H, Wang Y, Chen M, Zhou K, Zhou Y, Han S T 2019 Adv. Electron. Mater. 5 1800793 Google Scholar
[12]	Cui Z, Han Y W, Huang Q J, Dong J Y, Zhu Y 2018 Nanoscale 10 6806 Google Scholar
[13]	王文慧, 张孬 2018 67 247302 Google Scholar Wang W H, Zhang N 2018 Acta Phys. Sin. 67 247302 Google Scholar
[14]	Chen R, Hochbaum A I, Murphy P, Moore J, Yang P D, Majumdar A 2008 Phys. Rev. Lett. 101 105501 Google Scholar
[15]	Wu Z G, Neaton J B, Grossman J C 2008 Phys. Rev. Lett. 100 246804 Google Scholar
[16]	Blasé X, Fernandez-Serra M V 2008 Phys. Rev. Lett. 100 046802 Google Scholar
[17]	Durgun E, Cakir D, Akman N, Ciraci S 2007 Phys. Rev. Lett. 99 256806 Google Scholar
[18]	Leu P W, Svizhenko A, Cho K 2008 Phys. Rev. B 77 235305 Google Scholar
[19]	Sorokin P B, Avramov P V, Kvashnin A G, Kvashnin D G, Ovchinnikov S G, Fedorov A S 2008 Phys. Rev. B 77 235417 Google Scholar
[20]	鹿业波, 顾金梅, 刘楚辉, 彭文利 2016 半导体光电 37 370 Lu Y B, Gu J M, Liu C H, Peng W L 2016 Semicond. Optoelectron. 37 370
[21]	Hu L, Wu H, Cui Y 2011 MRS Bull. 36 760 Google Scholar
[22]	Cho Y J, Park I J, Lee H J, Kim J G 2015 J. Power Sources 277 370 Google Scholar
[23]	Lin M C, Gong M, Lu B, Wu Y, Wang D Y, Guan M, Angell M, Chen C, Yang J, Hwang B J, Dai H 2015 Nature 520 324 Google Scholar
[24]	Li S, Niu J, Zhao Y C, So K P, Wang C, Wang C A, Li J 2015 Nat. Commun. 6 7872 Google Scholar
[25]	Ju S, Li J, Liu J, Chen P C, Ha Y G, Ishikawa F, Chang H, Zhou C, Facchetti A, Janes D B, Marks T J 2008 Nano Lett. 8 997 Google Scholar
[26]	Fu K K, Wang Z, Dai J, Carter M, Hu L 2016 Chem. Mater. 28 3527 Google Scholar
[27]	Shaijumon M M, Perre E, Daffos B, Taberna P L, Tarascon J M, Simon P 2010 Adv. Mater. 22 4978 Google Scholar
[28]	Das A, Ronen Y, Most Y, Oreg Y, Heiblum M, Shtrikman H 2012 Nat. Phys. 8 887 Google Scholar
[29]	Li L, Xu X, Chew H, Huang X, Dou X, Pan S, Li G, Zhang L 2008 J. Phys. Chem. C 112 5328 Google Scholar
[30]	Lu Y, Tohmyoh H, Saka M 2012 Thin Solid Films 520 3448 Google Scholar
[31]	Sun Y X, Tohmoh H, Saka M 2009 J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. 9 1972 Google Scholar
[32]	Wang H, Li B 2018 J. Electrochem. Soc. 165 D641 Google Scholar
[33]	Chen Y, Wang Y, Zhu S, Chen C, Danner V A, Li Y, Dai J, Li H, Fu K K, Li T, Liu Y, Hu L 2019 ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 11 6009 Google Scholar
[34]	Azuma K, Sakajiri K, Okabe T, Matsumoto H, Kang S, Watanabe J, Tokita M 2017 Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 56 095002 Google Scholar
[35]	Chen Y, Zou J, Campbell S J, Le Caer G 2004 Appl. Phys. Lett. 84 2430 Google Scholar
[36]	Yuan J H, Liew K M 2009 Carbon 47 713 Google Scholar
[37]	Yuan J H, Liew K M 2009 Carbon 47 1526 Google Scholar
[38]	Jing L, Tay R Y, Li H L, Tsang S H, Huang J F, Tan D L, Zhang B W, Teo E H T, Tok A I Y 2016 Nanoscale 8 11114 Google Scholar
[39]	Xu F F, Bando Y, Golberg D, Hasegawa M, Mitome M 2004 Acta Mater. 52 601 Google Scholar
[40]	Golberg D, Bando Y, Mitome M, Fushimi K, Tang C C 2004 Acta Mater. 52 3295 Google Scholar
[41]	Ashrafi B, Jakubinek M B, Martinez-Rubi Y, Rahmat M, Djokic D, Laqua K, Park D, Kim K S, Simard B, Yousefpour A 2017 Acta Astronaut. 141 57 Google Scholar
[42]	Xu X J G, Gilburd L, Bando Y, Golberg D, Walker G C 2016 J. Phys. Chem. C 120 1945 Google Scholar
[43]	Tokoro H, Fujii S, Oku T 2005 Solid State Commun. 133 681 Google Scholar
[44]	Yuan J H, Liew K M 2010 J. Comput. Theor. Nanosci. 7 1878 Google Scholar
[45]	Kumar S, Srivastava V C, Mandal G K, Pattanayek S K, Sahoo K L 2017 J. Phys. Chem. C 121 20468 Google Scholar
[46]	袁剑辉, 黄维辉, 史向华, 杨昌虎 2013 稀有金属材料与工程 42 297 Google Scholar Yuan J H, Huang W H, Shi X H, Yang C H 2013 Rare Metal. Mat. Eng. 42 297 Google Scholar
[47]	袁剑辉, 黄维辉, 史向华, 张振华 2012 无机化学学报 28 125 Yuan J H, Huang W H, Shi X H, Zhang Z H 2012 Chin. J. Inorg. Chem. 28 125
[48]	Yuan J H, Liew K M 2011 J. Phys. Chem. C 115 431 Google Scholar
[49]	Yuan J H, Liew K M 2011 Nanotechnology 22 085701 Google Scholar
[50]	Yuan J H, Liew K M 2011 Carbon 49 677 Google Scholar
[51]	Yuan J H, Zhang L W, Liew K M 2017 Computat. Mater. Sci. 133 130 Google Scholar
[52]	Yuan J H, Zhang L W, Liew K M 2016 Current Nanosci. 12 636 Google Scholar
[53]	Yuan J H, Zhang L W, Liew K M 2015 RSC Adv. 5 74399 Google Scholar
[54]	Yuan J H, Liew K M 2014 Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 16 88 Google Scholar
[55]	Rappe A K, Casewit C J, Colwell K S, Goddard W A, Skiff W M 1992 J. Am. Chem. Soc. 114 10024 Google Scholar
[56]	Rappe A K, Colwell K S, Casewit C 1993 J. Inorg. Chem. 32 3438 Google Scholar
[57]	Srivastava D, Menon M, Cho K 1999 J. Phys. Rev. Lett. 83 2973 Google Scholar
[58]	Casewit C, J, Colwell K S, Rappe A K 1992 J. Am. Chem. Soc. 114 10046 Google Scholar

[1]	Yang Quan, Ma Li, Geng Song-Chao, Lin Yi-Ni, Chen Tao, Sun Li-Ning. Molecular dynamics simulation of contact behaviors between multiwall carbon nanotube and metal surface. Acta Physica Sinica, 2021, 70(10): 106101. doi: 10.7498/aps.70.20202194
[2]	Chen Yu-Jiang, Jiang Wu-Gui, Lin Yan-Wen, Zheng Pan. A novel triple-walled carbon nanotube screwing oscillator: a molecular dynamics simulation. Acta Physica Sinica, 2020, 69(22): 228801. doi: 10.7498/aps.69.20200821
[3]	Li Jie-Jie, Lu Bin-Bin, Xian Yue-Hui, Hu Guo-Ming, Xia Re. Characterization of nanoporous silver mechanical properties by molecular dynamics simulation. Acta Physica Sinica, 2018, 67(5): 056101. doi: 10.7498/aps.67.20172193
[4]	Li Rui, Liu Teng, Chen Xiang, Chen Si-Cong, Fu Yi-Hong, Liu Lin. Influence of interface structure on nanoindentation behavior of Cu/Ni multilayer film: Atomic scale simulation. Acta Physica Sinica, 2018, 67(19): 190202. doi: 10.7498/aps.67.20180958
[5]	Zhang Zhong-Qiang, Li Chong, Liu Han-Lun, Ge Dao-Han, Cheng Guang-Gui, Ding Jian-Ning. Molecular dynamics study on permeability of water in graphene-carbon nanotube hybrid structure. Acta Physica Sinica, 2018, 67(5): 056102. doi: 10.7498/aps.67.20172424
[6]	Lan Sheng, Li Kun, Gao Xin-Yun. Based on the molecular dynamics characteristic research of heat conduction of graphyne nanoribbons with vacancy defects. Acta Physica Sinica, 2017, 66(13): 136801. doi: 10.7498/aps.66.136801
[7]	Lin Chang-Peng, Liu Xin-Jian, Rao Zhong-Hao. Molecular dynamics simulation of the thermophysical properties and phase change behaviors of aluminum nanoparticles. Acta Physica Sinica, 2015, 64(8): 083601. doi: 10.7498/aps.64.083601
[8]	Han Dian-Rong, Wang Lu, Luo Cheng-Lin, Zhu Xing-Feng, Dai Ya-Fei. Torsional mechanical properties of (n, n)-(2n, 0) carbon nanotubes heterojunction. Acta Physica Sinica, 2015, 64(10): 106102. doi: 10.7498/aps.64.106102
[9]	Yuan Lin, Jing Peng, Liu Yan-Hua, Xu Zhen-Hai, Shan De-Bin, Guo Bin. Molecular dynamics simulation of polycrystal silver nanowires under tensile deformation. Acta Physica Sinica, 2014, 63(1): 016201. doi: 10.7498/aps.63.016201
[10]	Yang Cheng-Bing, Xie Hui, Liu Chao. Molecular dynamics simulation of average velocity of lithium iron across the end of carbon nanotube. Acta Physica Sinica, 2014, 63(20): 200508. doi: 10.7498/aps.63.200508
[11]	Ma Bin, Rao Qiu-Hua, He Yue-Hui, Wang Shi-Liang. Molecular dynamics simulation of tensile deformation mechanism of the single crystal tungsten nanowire. Acta Physica Sinica, 2013, 62(17): 176103. doi: 10.7498/aps.62.176103
[12]	Zhang Zhong-Qiang, Ding Jian-Ning, Liu Zhen, Xue Yi-Bin, Cheng Guang-Gui, Ling Zhi-Yong. Analysis of Interfacial Mechanical Properties of Carbon NanotubePolymer Composite. Acta Physica Sinica, 2012, 61(12): 126202. doi: 10.7498/aps.61.126202
[13]	Wang Zhi-Gang, Wu Liang, Zhang Yang, Wen Yu-Hua. Phase transition and coalescence behavior of fcc Fe nanoparticles: a molecular dynamics study. Acta Physica Sinica, 2011, 60(9): 096105. doi: 10.7498/aps.60.096105
[14]	Gu Fang, Zhang Jia-Hong, Yang Li-Juan, Gu Bin. Molecular dynamics simulation of resonance properties of strain graphene nanoribbons. Acta Physica Sinica, 2011, 60(5): 056103. doi: 10.7498/aps.60.056103
[15]	Wang Wei, Zhang Kai-Wang, Meng Li-Jun, Li Zhong-Qiu, Zuo Xue-Yun, Zhong Jian-Xin. Molecular dynamics simulation of the evaporation of the surface wall of multi-wall carbon nanotubes at high temperature. Acta Physica Sinica, 2010, 59(4): 2672-2678. doi: 10.7498/aps.59.2672
[16]	Tian Hui-Chen, Liu Li, Wen Yu-Hua. Shape changes and melting characteristics of cubic Pt nanoparticle：A molecular dynamics study. Acta Physica Sinica, 2009, 58(6): 4080-4084. doi: 10.7498/aps.58.4080
[17]	Wang Lei, Zhang Zhong-Qiang, Zhang Hong-Wu. Electrowetting in double-walled carbon nanotubes: molecular dynamics simulations. Acta Physica Sinica, 2008, 57(11): 7069-7077. doi: 10.7498/aps.57.7069
[18]	Zhou Guo-Rong, Gao Qiu-Ming. Freezing of Ni nanowires investigated by molecular dynamics simulation. Acta Physica Sinica, 2007, 56(3): 1499-1505. doi: 10.7498/aps.56.1499
[19]	Bao Wen-Xing, Zhu Chang-Chun. Study of thermal conduction of carbon nanotube by molecular dynamics. Acta Physica Sinica, 2006, 55(7): 3552-3557. doi: 10.7498/aps.55.3552
[20]	Wu Heng-An, Ni Xiang-Gui, Wang Yu, Wang Xiu-Xi. . Acta Physica Sinica, 2002, 51(7): 1412-1415. doi: 10.7498/aps.51.1412

Catalog

Vol. 68, Issue 18 - 2019-09-20

Metrics

Abstract views: 10784
PDF Downloads: 90
Cited By: 0

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

Search

Article

留言板