-
We propose a theoretical scheme for a one-dimensional lattice based on a superconducting quantum circuit system consisting of two types of superconducting microwave cavities, the interaction between nearest-neighbor and next-nearest-neighbor unit cells that can be adjusted by the magnetic flux, the system can obtain the collective dynamic evolution and study the topological properties of the system.First, we investigate the energy spectrum and edge states of the odd-even lattice size and find that the odd-even lattice number affects the topological properties of the system. Furthermore, considering the next-nearest interactions, it is found that there are constraints on the next-nearest interactions, which can be tuned to study the topological phase transitions of the system and the transfer of topological quantum states.In addition, considering the influence of defects on topological properties, it is found that the defect potential energy is small, the system energy band is stable, the edge states remain unchanged, and the energy spectrum fluctuation is small and distinguishable. Conversely, the energy band distribution is destroyed, it will become disordered and chaotic. The research results can design some new quantum devices for quantum optics and quantum information processing.
-
Keywords:
- quantum optics /
- superconducting quantum circuits /
- topological insulators /
- quantum states
[1] Qi X L, Zhang S C 2011 Rev. Mod. Phys. 83 1057Google Scholar
[2] Hasan M Z, Kane C L 2010 Rev. Mod. Phys. 82 3045Google Scholar
[3] Bansil A, Lin H, Das T 2016 Rev. Mod. Phys. 88 021004Google Scholar
[4] Chiu C K, Teo J C Y, Schnyder A P, Ryu S 2016 Rev. Mod. Phys 88 035005Google Scholar
[5] Xu Z, Zhang Y, Chen S 2017 Phys. Rev. A 96 013606Google Scholar
[6] Li L, Xu Z, Chen S 2014 Phys. Rev. B 89 085111Google Scholar
[7] Li L, Chen S 2015 Phys. Rev. B 92 085118Google Scholar
[8] Mei F, Zhu S L, Zhang Z M, Oh C H, Goldman N 2012 Phys. Rev. A 85 013638Google Scholar
[9] Xu Z, Zhang R, Chen S, Fu L, Zhang Y 2020 Phys. Rev. A 101 013635Google Scholar
[10] Wray L A, Xu v, Xia Y, Hsieh D, Fedorov A V, SanHor Y, Cava R J, Bansil A, Lin H, Hasan M Z 2011 Nat. Phys. 7 32Google Scholar
[11] Malki M, Uhrig G S 2017 Phys. Rev. B 95 235118Google Scholar
[12] Berg E, Dalla Torre E G, Giamarchi T, Altman E 2008 Phys. Rev. B 77 245119Google Scholar
[13] Chitov G Y 2018 Phys. Rev. B 97 085131Google Scholar
[14] Agrapidis C E, van den Brink J, Nishimoto S 2019 Phys. Rev. B 99 224418Google Scholar
[15] Feng X Y, Zhang G M, Xiang T 2007 Phys. Rev. Lett. 98 087204Google Scholar
[16] You J Q, Nori F 2011 Nature 474 589Google Scholar
[17] Devoret M H, Schoelkopf R J 2013 Science 339 1169Google Scholar
[18] Massel F, Heikkil T T, Pirkkalainen J M, Cho S U, Saloniemi H, Hakonen P J, Sillanpää M A 2011 Nature 480 351Google Scholar
[19] Teufel J D, Li D, Allman M S, Cicak K, Sirois A J, Whittaker J D, Simmonds R W 2011 Nature 471 204Google Scholar
[20] Irish E K, Schwab K 2003 Phys. Rev. B 68 155311Google Scholar
[21] LaHaye M D, Suh J, Echternach P M, Schwab K C, Roukes M L 2009 Nature 459 960Google Scholar
[22] Wang H F, Zhu A D, Zhang S, Yeon K H 2011 New J. Phys. 13 013021Google Scholar
[23] Xiang Z L, Ashhab S, You J Q, Nori F 2013 Rev. Mod. Phys. 85 623Google Scholar
[24] Blais A, Gambetta J, Wallraff A, Schuster D I, Girvin S M, Devoret M H, Schoelkopf R J 2007 Phys. Rev. A 75 032329Google Scholar
[25] Ji A C, Sun Q, Xie X C, Liu W M 2009 Phys. Rev. Lett. 102 023602Google Scholar
[26] Ji A C, Xie X C, Liu W M 2007 Phys. Rev. Lett. 99 183602Google Scholar
[27] Mei F, Chen G, Tian L, Zhu S L, Jia S 2018 Phys. Rev. A 98 012331Google Scholar
[28] Mei F, Chen G, Tian L, Zhu S L, Jia S 2018 Phys. Rev. A 98 032323Google Scholar
[29] Mei F, Xue Z Y, Zhang D W, Tian L, Lee C, Zhu S L 2016 Quantum Sci. Technol. 1 015006Google Scholar
[30] Zhang Z C, Shao L, Lu W J, Su Y G, Wang Y P, Liu J and Wang X G 2021 Phys. Rev. A 104 053517Google Scholar
[31] Wang Y P, Zhang Z C, Yu Y F and Zhang Z M 2019 Results Phys. 15 102560Google Scholar
[32] Koch J, Houck A A, Le Hur K, Girvin S M 2010 Phys. Rev. A 82 043811Google Scholar
[33] Mei F, You J B, Nie W, Fazio R, Zhu S L, Kwek L C 2015 Phys. Rev. A 92 041805Google Scholar
[34] Gu F L, Liu J, Mei F, Jia S, Zhang D W, Xue Z Y 2019 npj Quantum Inf. 5 36
[35] Huang Y, Yin Z, Yang W L 2016 Phys. Rev. A 94 022302Google Scholar
[36] Tan X, Zhao Y, Liu Q, Xue G, Yu H, Wang Z D, Yu Y 2017 npj Quantum Mater. 2 60Google Scholar
[37] Cao J, Yi X X, Wang H F 2020 Phys. Rev. A 102 032619Google Scholar
[38] Cai W, Han J, Mei F, Yuan X Z, Sun L Y 2019 Phys. Rev. Lett. 123 080501Google Scholar
-
图 1 一维超导微波腔晶格系统模型图 (a) 该系统由
$ a_n $ 和$ b_n $ 两种超导微波腔组成, 其中$ a_n $ 和$ b_n $ 的耦合系数为$ J_1 $ ,$ b_n $ 和$ a_{n+1} $ 的耦合系数为$ J_2 $ ,$ a_n $ 和$ a_{n+1} $ 的耦合系数为$ T_1 $ ,$ b_n $ 和$ b_{n+1} $ 的耦合系数为$ T_2 $ ; (b) 晶格等价的电路图, 其中$ L_n $ 和$ C_n $ 是超导微波腔总的电感和电容, 他们之间的耦合通过磁通超导量子比特调节Figure 1. One-dimensional superconducting microwave cavity lattice system model diagram: (a) The system consists of two superconducting microwave cavities
$ a_n $ and$ b_n $ , where$ a_n $ and$ b_n $ coupling coefficient is$ J_1 $ ,$ b_n $ and$ a_{n+1} $ coupling coefficient is$ J_2 $ ,$ a_n $ and$ a_{n+1} $ coupling coefficient is$ T_1 $ ,$ b_n $ and$ b_{n+1} $ coupling coefficient is$ T_2 $ ; (b) equivalent circuit diagram, where$ L_n $ and$ C_n $ are the total inductance and capacitance of the superconducting microwave cavity, and the coupling coefficients can be regulated by the magnetic flux superconducting qubit图 3 绘制系统能谱E与奇偶晶格数的物理图像: (a)—(d) N = 17, ϕ分别选取0,
$ \pi/3 $ ,$ 2\pi/3 $ 和π; (e)—(h) N = 18, ϕ分别选取0,$ \pi/4 $ ,$ \pi/2 $ 和πFigure 3. The energy spectrum E of the system via the odd and even lattice numbers: (a)–(d) N = 17,
$ \phi=0 $ ,$ \pi/3 $ ,$ 2\pi/3 $ and π; (e)–(h) N = 18,$ \phi=0 $ ,$ \pi/4 $ ,$ \pi/2 $ and π图 4 绘制系统零模能级态的分布与奇偶晶格数的物理图像: (a)—(d) N = 17, ϕ分别选取0,
$ \pi/3 $ ,$ 2\pi/3 $ 和π; (e)—(h) N = 18, ϕ分别选取0,$ \pi/3 $ ,$ \pi/2 $ 和$ 1.99\pi $ ; (i)—(l) N = 18, ϕ分别选取0,$ \pi/3 $ ,$ \pi/2 $ 和$ 1.99\pi $ Figure 4. The state distribution of the zero-mode energy and the odd-even lattice number: (a)–(d) N = 17,
$ \phi=0 $ ,$ \pi/3 $ ,$ 2\pi/3 $ and π; (e)–(h) N = 18,$ \phi=0 $ ,$ \pi/3 $ ,$ \pi/2 $ and$ 1.99\pi $ . (i)–(l) N = 18,$ \phi=0 $ ,$ \pi/3 $ ,$ \pi/2 $ and$ 1.99\pi $ 图 5 绘制系统能谱E与参数ϕ的物理图像, 选取晶格数N = 17 (a)
$ T_{1}=0.4 $ ,$ T_{2}=0 $ ; (b)$ T_{1}=0 $ ,$ T_{2}=0.4 $ ; (c)$ T_{1}=0.4 $ ,$ T_{2}=0.3 $ Figure 5. The energy spectrum E of the system via the parameter ϕ, N = 17: (a)
$ T_{1}=0.4 $ ,$ T_{2}=0 $ ; (b)$ T_{1}=0 $ ,$ T_{2}=0.4 $ ; (c)$ T_{1}=0.4 $ ,$ T_{2}=0.3 $ 图 7 绘制态的分布与参数ϕ和晶格数的物理图像, 选取晶格数N = 17 (a)
$ T_{1}=0 $ ,$ T_{2}=0 $ ; (b)$ T_{1}=0.6 $ ,$ T_{2}=0 $ ; (c)$ T_{1}= $ $ 0 $ ,$ T_{2}=0.3 $ ; (d)$ T_{1}=0.6 $ ,$ T_{2}=0.3 $ Figure 7. The state distribution via the lattice numbers and the parameter ϕ, N = 17: (a)
$ T_{1}=0 $ ,$ T_{2}=0 $ ; (b)$ T_{1}=0.6 $ ,$ T_{2}=0 $ ; (c)$ T_{1}=0 $ ,$ T_{2}=0.3 $ ; (d)$ T_{1}=0.6 $ ,$ T_{2}=0.3 $ 图 8 绘制态的分布与参数ϕ和晶格数的物理图像, 选取晶格数N = 18 (a)
$ T_{1}=0.1 $ ,$ T_{2}=0.1 $ ; (b)$ T_{1}=0.01 $ ,$ T_{2}=0 $ ; (c)$ T_{1}= $ $ 0 $ ,$ T_{2}=0.01 $ ; (d)$ T_{1}=0.2 $ ,$ T_{2}=0.19 $ Figure 8. The state distribution via the lattice numbers and the parameter ϕ, N = 18: (a)
$ T_{1}=0.1 $ ,$ T_{2}=0.1 $ ; (b)$ T_{1}= 0.01 $ ,$ T_{2}=0 $ ; (c)$ T_{1}=0 $ ,$ T_{2}=0.01 $ ; (d)$ T_{1}=0.2 $ ,$ T_{2}=0.19 $ 图 9 绘制能谱E与参数ϕ的物理图像, 选取晶格数N = 18 (a) 在第9个和第10个晶格分别加入缺陷势能
$ \text {δ}W=-0.1 $ ,$ \text {δ} W =0.1 $ ; (b) 在第9个和第10个晶格分别加入缺陷势能$ \text {δ} W =0.1 $ ,$ \text {δ} W =-0.1 $ ; (c) 每个晶格引入缺陷势能$ \text {δ} W=0.5 $ ; (d) 每个晶格引入随机位缺陷势能δW = –0.1—0.1; (e) 每个晶格引入随机位缺陷势能δW = –0.3—0.3; (f) 每个晶格引入随机位缺陷势能δW = –0.8—0.8Figure 9. The energy spectrum E of the system via the parameter ϕ, N = 18: (a) Add defect potentials
$ \text {δ} W=-0.1 $ and$ \text {δ} W=0.1 $ to the 9 and 10 lattices, respectively; (b) add defect potentials$ \text {δ} W=0.1 $ and$ \text {δ}W=-0.1 $ to the 9 and 10 lattices, respectively; (c) each lattice point introduces a defect potential energy$ \text {δ} W=0.5 $ ; (d) potential energy δW = –0.1–0.1 for the introduction of random site defects at lattice point; (e) potential energy δW = –0.3–0.3 for the introduction of random site defects at lattice point; (f) potential energy δW = –0.8–0.8 for the introduction of random site defects at lattice point -
[1] Qi X L, Zhang S C 2011 Rev. Mod. Phys. 83 1057Google Scholar
[2] Hasan M Z, Kane C L 2010 Rev. Mod. Phys. 82 3045Google Scholar
[3] Bansil A, Lin H, Das T 2016 Rev. Mod. Phys. 88 021004Google Scholar
[4] Chiu C K, Teo J C Y, Schnyder A P, Ryu S 2016 Rev. Mod. Phys 88 035005Google Scholar
[5] Xu Z, Zhang Y, Chen S 2017 Phys. Rev. A 96 013606Google Scholar
[6] Li L, Xu Z, Chen S 2014 Phys. Rev. B 89 085111Google Scholar
[7] Li L, Chen S 2015 Phys. Rev. B 92 085118Google Scholar
[8] Mei F, Zhu S L, Zhang Z M, Oh C H, Goldman N 2012 Phys. Rev. A 85 013638Google Scholar
[9] Xu Z, Zhang R, Chen S, Fu L, Zhang Y 2020 Phys. Rev. A 101 013635Google Scholar
[10] Wray L A, Xu v, Xia Y, Hsieh D, Fedorov A V, SanHor Y, Cava R J, Bansil A, Lin H, Hasan M Z 2011 Nat. Phys. 7 32Google Scholar
[11] Malki M, Uhrig G S 2017 Phys. Rev. B 95 235118Google Scholar
[12] Berg E, Dalla Torre E G, Giamarchi T, Altman E 2008 Phys. Rev. B 77 245119Google Scholar
[13] Chitov G Y 2018 Phys. Rev. B 97 085131Google Scholar
[14] Agrapidis C E, van den Brink J, Nishimoto S 2019 Phys. Rev. B 99 224418Google Scholar
[15] Feng X Y, Zhang G M, Xiang T 2007 Phys. Rev. Lett. 98 087204Google Scholar
[16] You J Q, Nori F 2011 Nature 474 589Google Scholar
[17] Devoret M H, Schoelkopf R J 2013 Science 339 1169Google Scholar
[18] Massel F, Heikkil T T, Pirkkalainen J M, Cho S U, Saloniemi H, Hakonen P J, Sillanpää M A 2011 Nature 480 351Google Scholar
[19] Teufel J D, Li D, Allman M S, Cicak K, Sirois A J, Whittaker J D, Simmonds R W 2011 Nature 471 204Google Scholar
[20] Irish E K, Schwab K 2003 Phys. Rev. B 68 155311Google Scholar
[21] LaHaye M D, Suh J, Echternach P M, Schwab K C, Roukes M L 2009 Nature 459 960Google Scholar
[22] Wang H F, Zhu A D, Zhang S, Yeon K H 2011 New J. Phys. 13 013021Google Scholar
[23] Xiang Z L, Ashhab S, You J Q, Nori F 2013 Rev. Mod. Phys. 85 623Google Scholar
[24] Blais A, Gambetta J, Wallraff A, Schuster D I, Girvin S M, Devoret M H, Schoelkopf R J 2007 Phys. Rev. A 75 032329Google Scholar
[25] Ji A C, Sun Q, Xie X C, Liu W M 2009 Phys. Rev. Lett. 102 023602Google Scholar
[26] Ji A C, Xie X C, Liu W M 2007 Phys. Rev. Lett. 99 183602Google Scholar
[27] Mei F, Chen G, Tian L, Zhu S L, Jia S 2018 Phys. Rev. A 98 012331Google Scholar
[28] Mei F, Chen G, Tian L, Zhu S L, Jia S 2018 Phys. Rev. A 98 032323Google Scholar
[29] Mei F, Xue Z Y, Zhang D W, Tian L, Lee C, Zhu S L 2016 Quantum Sci. Technol. 1 015006Google Scholar
[30] Zhang Z C, Shao L, Lu W J, Su Y G, Wang Y P, Liu J and Wang X G 2021 Phys. Rev. A 104 053517Google Scholar
[31] Wang Y P, Zhang Z C, Yu Y F and Zhang Z M 2019 Results Phys. 15 102560Google Scholar
[32] Koch J, Houck A A, Le Hur K, Girvin S M 2010 Phys. Rev. A 82 043811Google Scholar
[33] Mei F, You J B, Nie W, Fazio R, Zhu S L, Kwek L C 2015 Phys. Rev. A 92 041805Google Scholar
[34] Gu F L, Liu J, Mei F, Jia S, Zhang D W, Xue Z Y 2019 npj Quantum Inf. 5 36
[35] Huang Y, Yin Z, Yang W L 2016 Phys. Rev. A 94 022302Google Scholar
[36] Tan X, Zhao Y, Liu Q, Xue G, Yu H, Wang Z D, Yu Y 2017 npj Quantum Mater. 2 60Google Scholar
[37] Cao J, Yi X X, Wang H F 2020 Phys. Rev. A 102 032619Google Scholar
[38] Cai W, Han J, Mei F, Yuan X Z, Sun L Y 2019 Phys. Rev. Lett. 123 080501Google Scholar
Catalog
Metrics
- Abstract views: 4044
- PDF Downloads: 88
- Cited By: 0