-
Based on the generalized Lorenz Mie theory, the propagation and scattering properties of a uniaxial anisotropic spherical particle illuminated separately by double zero-order Bessel beam with arbitrary propagation direction and polarization direction are studied. The propagation and scattering characteristics are compared with those of a uniaxial anisotropic spherical particle illuminated by a single zero-order Bessel beam. Using the orthogonal relation of the spherical vector wave function and coordinate rotation theorem, the expanded forms of double zero-order Bessel beams with arbitrary propagation direction and polarization direction are derived. The analytical expressions of the expansion coefficients are derived by the integral method. The expansion coefficients of total incident field are obtained through the vector superposition principle. Based on the Fourier transform and tangentially continuous boundary conditions, the internal electromagnetic field of the uniaxial anisotropic sphere is expanded in terms of the spherical vector wave function and the scattering coefficients are derived. By comparing the angular distribution of the radar cross section of the particle illuminated by single and double zero-order Bessel beam when degenerating into plane waves with those results given by the literature, the correctness of the theory and the program in this paper are both verified. The effects of the incidence angle, conic angle and polarization angle on angle distribution of the radar cross section are numerically analyzed. The theoretical and numerical results in this paper are expected to be used to study the scattering properties, particle size analysis and optical trapping for anisotropic particles, biological cells and other particles illuminated by multi-beams.
-
Keywords:
- scattering /
- anisotropic particles /
- double beams /
- Bessel beam
[1] Durnin J 1987 J. Opt. Soc. 4 651Google Scholar
[2] Garces-Chavez V, Roskey D, Summers M D, Melville H, Mcgloin D, Wright E M, Dholakia K 2004 Appl. Phys. Lett. 85 4001Google Scholar
[3] Marston P L 2006 J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 120 3518Google Scholar
[4] Zhang L, Marston P L 2012 J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 131 329Google Scholar
[5] Milne G, Dholakia K, Mcgloin D 2007 Opt. Express 15 13972Google Scholar
[6] Vahimaa P, Kettunen V, Kuittnen M 1997 J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 14 1817Google Scholar
[7] Ding D, Liu X 1999 J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 16 1286Google Scholar
[8] Cimár T, Kollárová V, Bouchal Z, Zemánek P 2006 New J. Phys. 8 43Google Scholar
[9] Taylor J M, Love G D 2009 J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 26 278Google Scholar
[10] Ambrosio L A, Herández-Figueroa H E 2011 Biomed. Opt. Express 2 1893Google Scholar
[11] Mishra S R 1991 Opt. Commun. 85 159Google Scholar
[12] Marton P L 2007 J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 121 753Google Scholar
[13] Ma X B, Li E 2010 Chin. Opt. Lett. 8 1195Google Scholar
[14] Gouesbet G, Maheu B, Gréhan G 1988 J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 5 1427Google Scholar
[15] Li R X, Guo L X, Ding C 2013 Opt. Commun. 307 25Google Scholar
[16] Mitri F G 2011 Opt. Lett. 36 766Google Scholar
[17] Cui Z W, Han Y P, Han L 2013 J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 30 1913Google Scholar
[18] Klimov V 2020 Opt. Lett. 45 4300Google Scholar
[19] Wang X, Wang L, Lin P 2021 J. Innovative. Opt. Health Sci. 14 2150008Google Scholar
[20] Stout B, Nevière M, Popov E 2006 J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 23 1111Google Scholar
[21] Wong K L, Chen H T 1992 IEE Proc. H 139 314Google Scholar
[22] Qiu C W, Li L W, Yeo T S 2007 Phys. Rev. E 75 026609Google Scholar
[23] Geng Y L, Wu X B, Li L W, Guan B R 2004 Phys. Rev. E 70 056609Google Scholar
[24] Wang M J, Zhang H Y, Liu G S, Li Y L 2012 J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 29 2376Google Scholar
[25] Yuan Q K, Wu Z S, Li Z J 2010 J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 27 1457Google Scholar
[26] Wu Z S, Yuan Q K, Peng Y, Li Z J 2009 J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 26 1778Google Scholar
[27] Wang J J, Chen A T, Han Y P 2015 J. Quant. Spectrosc. Radiat. Transfer. 167 135Google Scholar
[28] Qu T, Wu Z S, Shang Q C, Li Z J, Bai L 2013 J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 30 1661Google Scholar
[29] Zemánek P, Alexandr J, Liska M 2002 J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 19 1025Google Scholar
[30] Li Z J, Wu Z S, Qu T, Li H Y, Bai L, Gong L 2015 J. Quant. Spectrosc. Radiat. Transfer. 162 56Google Scholar
[31] Hulst H 1957 Phys. Today 10 28Google Scholar
[32] Barton J P, Alexander D R, Schaub S A 1988 J. Appl. Phys. 64 1632Google Scholar
[33] Li Z J, Wu Z S, Qu T, Shang Q C, Bai L 2016 J. Quant. Spectrosc. Radiat. Transfer. 169 1Google Scholar
[34] Bolton H C 1959 Mathematical Gazette 43 157Google Scholar
[35] Li Z J, Wu Z S, Huan L, Li H Y 2011 Chin. Phys. B 20 081101Google Scholar
[36] Li M M, Yin S H, Yao B L, Lei M, Yang Y L, Min J W 2015 J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 32 468Google Scholar
[37] Wu Z S, Li Z J, Li H Y, Yuan Q K, Li H Y 2011 IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 59 4740Google Scholar
[38] 李正军, 吴振森, 屈檀, 白璐, 曹运华 2014 电波科学学报 29 668Google Scholar
Li Z J, Wu Z S, Qu T, Bai L, Cao Y H 2014 Chin. J. Radio 29 668Google Scholar
[39] Li Z J, Wu Z S, Shang Q C 2015 Procedia Eng. 102 89Google Scholar
-
图 3 相同极化角下反向传播双零阶贝塞尔波束的电场强度分布 (a)
${C_1} = {C_2} = 5^\circ $ ; (b)${C_1} = {C_2} = 15^\circ $ ; (c)${C_1} = {C_2} = 30^\circ $ Figure 3. Electric intensity distribution of back propagating double zero-order Bessel beams with identical polarization angles: (a)
${C_1} = $ $ {C_2} = 5^\circ $ ; (b)${C_1} = {C_2} = 15^\circ $ ; (c)${C_1} = {C_2} = 30^\circ $ .图 4 不同极化角下反向传播双零阶贝塞尔波束的电场强度分布 (a)
${C_1} = {C_2} = 5^\circ $ ; (b)${C_1} = {C_2} = 15^\circ $ ; (c)${C_1} = {C_2} = 30^\circ $ Figure 4. Electric intensity distribution of back propagating double zero-order Bessel beams with different polarization angles: (a)
${C_1} = {C_2} = 5^\circ $ ; (b)${C_1} = {C_2} = 15^\circ $ ; (c)${C_1} = {C_2} = 30^\circ $ .图 5 斜入射时反向传播双零阶贝塞尔波束的电场强度分布 (a)
${C_1} = {C_2} = 5^\circ $ ; (b)${C_1} = {C_2} = 15^\circ $ ; (c)${C_1} = {C_2} = 30^\circ $ Figure 5. Electric intensity distribution of back propagating double zero-order Bessel beams with oblique incidence: (a)
${C_1} = {C_2} = 5^\circ $ ; (b)${C_1} = {C_2} = 15^\circ $ ; (c)${C_1} = {C_2} = 30^\circ $ .图 6 斜入射时非反向传播双零阶贝塞尔波束的电场强度分布 (a)
${C_1} = {C_2} = 5^\circ $ ; (b)${C_1} = {C_2} = 15^\circ $ ; (c)${C_1} = $ $ {C_2} = 30^\circ $ Figure 6. Electric intensity distribution of non-back propagating double zero-order Bessel beams with oblique incidence: (a)
${C_1} = $ $ {C_2} = 5^\circ $ ; (b)${C_1} = {C_2} = 15^\circ $ ; (c)${C_1} = {C_2} = 30^\circ $ . -
[1] Durnin J 1987 J. Opt. Soc. 4 651Google Scholar
[2] Garces-Chavez V, Roskey D, Summers M D, Melville H, Mcgloin D, Wright E M, Dholakia K 2004 Appl. Phys. Lett. 85 4001Google Scholar
[3] Marston P L 2006 J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 120 3518Google Scholar
[4] Zhang L, Marston P L 2012 J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 131 329Google Scholar
[5] Milne G, Dholakia K, Mcgloin D 2007 Opt. Express 15 13972Google Scholar
[6] Vahimaa P, Kettunen V, Kuittnen M 1997 J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 14 1817Google Scholar
[7] Ding D, Liu X 1999 J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 16 1286Google Scholar
[8] Cimár T, Kollárová V, Bouchal Z, Zemánek P 2006 New J. Phys. 8 43Google Scholar
[9] Taylor J M, Love G D 2009 J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 26 278Google Scholar
[10] Ambrosio L A, Herández-Figueroa H E 2011 Biomed. Opt. Express 2 1893Google Scholar
[11] Mishra S R 1991 Opt. Commun. 85 159Google Scholar
[12] Marton P L 2007 J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 121 753Google Scholar
[13] Ma X B, Li E 2010 Chin. Opt. Lett. 8 1195Google Scholar
[14] Gouesbet G, Maheu B, Gréhan G 1988 J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 5 1427Google Scholar
[15] Li R X, Guo L X, Ding C 2013 Opt. Commun. 307 25Google Scholar
[16] Mitri F G 2011 Opt. Lett. 36 766Google Scholar
[17] Cui Z W, Han Y P, Han L 2013 J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 30 1913Google Scholar
[18] Klimov V 2020 Opt. Lett. 45 4300Google Scholar
[19] Wang X, Wang L, Lin P 2021 J. Innovative. Opt. Health Sci. 14 2150008Google Scholar
[20] Stout B, Nevière M, Popov E 2006 J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 23 1111Google Scholar
[21] Wong K L, Chen H T 1992 IEE Proc. H 139 314Google Scholar
[22] Qiu C W, Li L W, Yeo T S 2007 Phys. Rev. E 75 026609Google Scholar
[23] Geng Y L, Wu X B, Li L W, Guan B R 2004 Phys. Rev. E 70 056609Google Scholar
[24] Wang M J, Zhang H Y, Liu G S, Li Y L 2012 J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 29 2376Google Scholar
[25] Yuan Q K, Wu Z S, Li Z J 2010 J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 27 1457Google Scholar
[26] Wu Z S, Yuan Q K, Peng Y, Li Z J 2009 J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 26 1778Google Scholar
[27] Wang J J, Chen A T, Han Y P 2015 J. Quant. Spectrosc. Radiat. Transfer. 167 135Google Scholar
[28] Qu T, Wu Z S, Shang Q C, Li Z J, Bai L 2013 J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 30 1661Google Scholar
[29] Zemánek P, Alexandr J, Liska M 2002 J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 19 1025Google Scholar
[30] Li Z J, Wu Z S, Qu T, Li H Y, Bai L, Gong L 2015 J. Quant. Spectrosc. Radiat. Transfer. 162 56Google Scholar
[31] Hulst H 1957 Phys. Today 10 28Google Scholar
[32] Barton J P, Alexander D R, Schaub S A 1988 J. Appl. Phys. 64 1632Google Scholar
[33] Li Z J, Wu Z S, Qu T, Shang Q C, Bai L 2016 J. Quant. Spectrosc. Radiat. Transfer. 169 1Google Scholar
[34] Bolton H C 1959 Mathematical Gazette 43 157Google Scholar
[35] Li Z J, Wu Z S, Huan L, Li H Y 2011 Chin. Phys. B 20 081101Google Scholar
[36] Li M M, Yin S H, Yao B L, Lei M, Yang Y L, Min J W 2015 J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 32 468Google Scholar
[37] Wu Z S, Li Z J, Li H Y, Yuan Q K, Li H Y 2011 IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 59 4740Google Scholar
[38] 李正军, 吴振森, 屈檀, 白璐, 曹运华 2014 电波科学学报 29 668Google Scholar
Li Z J, Wu Z S, Qu T, Bai L, Cao Y H 2014 Chin. J. Radio 29 668Google Scholar
[39] Li Z J, Wu Z S, Shang Q C 2015 Procedia Eng. 102 89Google Scholar
Catalog
Metrics
- Abstract views: 4328
- PDF Downloads: 61
- Cited By: 0