-
相较于平面波, 贝塞尔涡旋波束作为典型的涡旋波束, 以其携带轨道角动量(orbital angular momentum, OAM)、无衍射、自重建的特性, 使其在雷达检测、目标识别与成像等领域具有更加显著的竞争力 . 本文根据物理光学法和三角形面片建模, 并结合贝塞尔涡旋波束的角谱展开法, 导出了贝塞尔涡旋波束入射到任意金属目标的散射近场表达式, 通过与FEKO软件仿真结果对比验证了本文方法的正确性. 数值计算了简单和组合目标的散射近场的幅相和OAM分布以及雷达散射截面(radar cross section, RCS), 分析了波束参数、接收面的距离和目标偏移波束距离等因素的影响. 结果表明贝塞尔涡旋波束照射下的目标的近场幅相和OAM扰动与多种因素相关, 这为进一步利用近场散射特征获得更多的目标信息奠定了基础.Bessel vortex beam, as a typical vortex beam, has the characteristics of carrying orbital angular momentum (OAM), no diffraction, and self-reconstruction, which makes it more competitive than plane wave in the field of future vortex beam target detection and imaging. In order to study the near-field electromagnetic scattering of a vortex beam by a metal target, the expression of the near-scattering field of Bessel vortex beam incident on any metal target is obtained by using the physical optics method, triangular surface element modeling, and the plane wave angular spectrum expansion method of vector Bessel vortex beam. The correctness of the proposed method is verified by comparing with the simulation results of FEKO software. The amplitude distribution and phase distribution of electric field, the OAM spectrum distribution and radar cross section (RCS) of the near-scattering field of the Bessel vortex beam incident on the simple target and the combined target are calculated. The effects of beam parameters, receiving distance, target shape and the positions of beam transmitting and receiving surfaces on near-field scattering results are numerically calculated. In addition, the distributions of near-field OAM spectra under different conditions and the near-field RCS distributions of different targets are given. The numerical results show that the near-field results of Bessel vortex beam incident on metal targets are related to the beam parameters, and conform to the law of Bessel beam changing with parameters. The near-field electric amplitude distribution is affected by the distance between the receiving surface and the target, but the phase distribution is hardly affected. The near-field scattering results reflect the changes of target shape. Under normal incidence, when the target is regular and symmetrical, the amplitude distribution and phase distribution are relatively regular, and the main mode is dominant. When the beam is obliquely incident on or does not fully illuminate the target, the amplitude distribution and phase distribution change, which will lead the derived mode to increase. In particular, when the target and the receiving surface both deviate from the incident beam, the OAM disturbance is the most severe. In the near-field RCS distribution, the RCS distributions of different targets are obviously different, and the results of E plane and H plane are also different. It can be seen from the numerical calculation results that the near-field scattering of Bessel vortex beam by a metal target contains a variety of information. The application of vortex electromagnetic wave will help improve the information acquisition of electromagnetic wave and target detection capability. The results in this work can provide a reference for target imaging and vortex radar detection.
-
Keywords:
- near-field scattering /
- plane wave angular spectrum theory /
- vortex beam /
- orbital angular momentum
[1] Allen L, Beijersbergen M W, Spreeuw R J C, Woerdman J P 1992 Phys. Rev. A 45 8185Google Scholar
[2] Mawet D, Riaud P, Absil O, Surdej J 2005 Astrophys. J. 633 1191Google Scholar
[3] Swartzlander G A, Ford E L, Abdul-Malik R S, Close L M, Peters M A, Palacios D M, Wilson D W 2008 Opt. Express 16 10200Google Scholar
[4] Arlt J, Dholakia K, Allen L, Padgett M J 1998 J. Modern Opt. 45 1231
[5] Vaziri A, Weihs G, Zeilinger A 2002 J. Optics B 4 S47Google Scholar
[6] Tamburini F, Mari E, Sponselli A, Thidé B, Bianchini A, Romanato F 2012 New J. Phys. 14 033001Google Scholar
[7] Tamburini F, Mari E, Thidé B, Barbieri C, Romanato F 2011 Appl. Phys. Lett. 99 204102Google Scholar
[8] Liu K, Cheng Y Q, Yang Z C, Wang H Q, Qin Y L, Li X 2015 IEEE Antenn. Wirel. Pr. 14 711Google Scholar
[9] Tang B, Guo K Y, Wang J P, Sheng X Q 2017 IEEE Antenn. Wirel. Pr. 16 2975Google Scholar
[10] Zhang C, Chen D 2017 IEEE Antenn. Wirel. Pr. 16 2316Google Scholar
[11] Bu X X, Zhang Z, Chen L Y, Liang X D, Tang H B, Wang X M 2018 IEEE Antenn. Wirel. Pr. 17 764Google Scholar
[12] Chen H T, Zhang Z Q, Yu J 2020 Appl. Comput. Electrom. 35 129Google Scholar
[13] Chen Z, Zong X, Zhang Z, Que X, Nie Z 2019 Cross Strait Quad-Regional Radio Science and Wireless Technology Conference Taiyuan, China, July 18–21, 2019 p1
[14] 蒋基恒, 余世星, 寇娜, 丁召, 张正平 2021 70 238401Google Scholar
Jiang J H, Yu S X, Kou N, Ding Z, Zhang Z P 2021 Acta Phys. Sin. 70 238401Google Scholar
[15] Nayeri P, Elsherbeni A Z, Yang F 2021 Appl. Comput. Electrom. 28 284
[16] Durnin J 1987 J. Opt. Soc. 4 651Google Scholar
[17] MacDonald R P, Boothroyd S A, Okamoto T, Chrostowski J, Syrett B A 1996 Opt. Commun. 122 169Google Scholar
[18] 戴玉蓉, 丁德胜 2011 60 124302Google Scholar
Dai Y R, Ding D S 2011 Acta Phys. Sin. 60 124302Google Scholar
[19] Velchev I, Ubachs W 2001 Opt. Lett. 26 530Google Scholar
[20] Wu Z, Wu J J, Li H Y, Qu T, Meng X S, Xu Q, Wu Z S, Bai J, Yang L, Gong L, Yun Y 2022 IEEE Antenn. Wirel. Pr. 21 1288Google Scholar
[21] Shao G H, Yan S C, Luo W, Lu G W, Lu Y Q 2017 Sci. Rep. 7 1062Google Scholar
-
图 6 10 GHz下不同贝塞尔波束参数下的平板近场幅相分布 (a)—(f) 拓扑荷数
$ l = 1, 2, 3 $ , 半锥角$\alpha_0 = 10^\circ$ ; (g)—(l) 半锥角$\alpha_0 = 8^\circ , 10^\circ , 12^\circ$ , 拓扑荷数$ l = 2 $ ; (m) 平板目标散射示意图Fig. 6. Amplitude, phase distribution of scattering near fields with the different Bessel beam parameters at 10 GHz: (a)–(f) Topological charges
$l = 1,\; 2,\; 3$ , half-cone angle$\alpha_0 = 10^\circ$ ; (g)–(l) half-cone angles$\alpha_0 = 8^\circ , 10^\circ , 12^\circ$ , topological charge$ l = 2 $ ; (m) schematic for the scattering of a flat.图 8 球锥、圆柱、棱台和船体目标的散射近场的幅相和OAM模态分布 (a)—(d)幅值分布; (e)—(h) 相位分布; (i) OAM模态分布
Fig. 8. Amplitude, phase distribution and OAM spectra of the near scattering field of spherical cone, cylinder, truncated pyramid and ship: (a)–(d) Amplitude distributions; (e)–(h) phase distributions; (i) OAM spectra distributions.
图 9 入射角
$ {\theta _0} = 10^\circ $ 时圆柱、棱台和船体目标的散射近场的幅相和OAM模态分布 (a)—(c)幅值分布; (d)—(f)相位分布; (g) OAM模态分布; (h) 散射几何示意图Fig. 9. Amplitude, phase distribution and OAM spectra of near scattering field of cylinder, truncated pyramid and ship targets at incidence angle
$ {\theta _0} = 10^\circ $ : (a)–(c) Amplitude distribution; (d)–(f) phase distribution; (g) OAM spectra distribution; (h) schematic for target scattering geometry.图 10 偏移入射波束的船体目标前向散射近场的幅相和OAM模态分布 (a), (d)
$ \Delta d = 1\lambda $ ; (b), (e)$ \Delta d = 2\lambda $ ; (c), (f)$\Delta d = 3\lambda$ ; (g)$ \Delta d = 1\lambda , 2\lambda , 3\lambda $ 时的OAM分布; (h) 目标散射几何示意图Fig. 10. Amplitude, phase distribution and OAM spectra of forward near scattering field of ship target with offset incident beam: (a), (d)
$ \Delta d = 1\lambda $ ; (b), (e)$ \Delta d = 2\lambda $ ; (c), (f)$ \Delta d = 3\lambda $ ; (g) OAM spectra at$ \Delta d = 1\lambda , 2\lambda , 3\lambda $ ; (h) schematic for target scattering geometry.图 11 偏移入射场的船体目标后向散射近场的幅相分布和OAM模态分布 (a), (d)
$ \Delta d = 1\lambda $ ; (b), (e)$ \Delta d = 2\lambda $ ; (c), (f)$\Delta d = $ $ 4\lambda$ ; (g)$\Delta d = 1\lambda , \;2\lambda , \;4\lambda$ 时的OAM分布; (h) 散射几何示意图Fig. 11. Amplitude, phase distribution and OAM spectra of the backward near scattering field of a ship target offset by the incident field: (a), (d)
$ \Delta d = 1\lambda $ ; (b), (e)$ \Delta d = 2\lambda $ ; (c), (f)$ \Delta d = 4\lambda $ ; (g) OAM spectra at$\Delta d = 1\lambda ,\; 2\lambda ,\; 4\lambda$ ; (h) schematic for target scattering geometry. -
[1] Allen L, Beijersbergen M W, Spreeuw R J C, Woerdman J P 1992 Phys. Rev. A 45 8185Google Scholar
[2] Mawet D, Riaud P, Absil O, Surdej J 2005 Astrophys. J. 633 1191Google Scholar
[3] Swartzlander G A, Ford E L, Abdul-Malik R S, Close L M, Peters M A, Palacios D M, Wilson D W 2008 Opt. Express 16 10200Google Scholar
[4] Arlt J, Dholakia K, Allen L, Padgett M J 1998 J. Modern Opt. 45 1231
[5] Vaziri A, Weihs G, Zeilinger A 2002 J. Optics B 4 S47Google Scholar
[6] Tamburini F, Mari E, Sponselli A, Thidé B, Bianchini A, Romanato F 2012 New J. Phys. 14 033001Google Scholar
[7] Tamburini F, Mari E, Thidé B, Barbieri C, Romanato F 2011 Appl. Phys. Lett. 99 204102Google Scholar
[8] Liu K, Cheng Y Q, Yang Z C, Wang H Q, Qin Y L, Li X 2015 IEEE Antenn. Wirel. Pr. 14 711Google Scholar
[9] Tang B, Guo K Y, Wang J P, Sheng X Q 2017 IEEE Antenn. Wirel. Pr. 16 2975Google Scholar
[10] Zhang C, Chen D 2017 IEEE Antenn. Wirel. Pr. 16 2316Google Scholar
[11] Bu X X, Zhang Z, Chen L Y, Liang X D, Tang H B, Wang X M 2018 IEEE Antenn. Wirel. Pr. 17 764Google Scholar
[12] Chen H T, Zhang Z Q, Yu J 2020 Appl. Comput. Electrom. 35 129Google Scholar
[13] Chen Z, Zong X, Zhang Z, Que X, Nie Z 2019 Cross Strait Quad-Regional Radio Science and Wireless Technology Conference Taiyuan, China, July 18–21, 2019 p1
[14] 蒋基恒, 余世星, 寇娜, 丁召, 张正平 2021 70 238401Google Scholar
Jiang J H, Yu S X, Kou N, Ding Z, Zhang Z P 2021 Acta Phys. Sin. 70 238401Google Scholar
[15] Nayeri P, Elsherbeni A Z, Yang F 2021 Appl. Comput. Electrom. 28 284
[16] Durnin J 1987 J. Opt. Soc. 4 651Google Scholar
[17] MacDonald R P, Boothroyd S A, Okamoto T, Chrostowski J, Syrett B A 1996 Opt. Commun. 122 169Google Scholar
[18] 戴玉蓉, 丁德胜 2011 60 124302Google Scholar
Dai Y R, Ding D S 2011 Acta Phys. Sin. 60 124302Google Scholar
[19] Velchev I, Ubachs W 2001 Opt. Lett. 26 530Google Scholar
[20] Wu Z, Wu J J, Li H Y, Qu T, Meng X S, Xu Q, Wu Z S, Bai J, Yang L, Gong L, Yun Y 2022 IEEE Antenn. Wirel. Pr. 21 1288Google Scholar
[21] Shao G H, Yan S C, Luo W, Lu G W, Lu Y Q 2017 Sci. Rep. 7 1062Google Scholar
计量
- 文章访问数: 3381
- PDF下载量: 110
- 被引次数: 0