-
A two-dimensional self-similarity transformation theory is established, and the focusing (parabolic) (2 + 1)-dimensional NLS equation is taken as the model. The two-dimensional self-similarity transformation is proposed for converting the focusing (2 + 1)-dimensional NLS equation into the focusing (1 + 1) dimensional NLS equations, and the excitation of its novel line-rogue waves is further investigated. It is found that the spatial coherent structures induced by the Akhmediev breathers (AB) and Kuznetsov-Ma solitons (KMS) also have the short-lived characteristics which are possessed by the line-rogue waves induced by the Peregrine solitons, and the other higher-order rogue waves and the multi-rogue waves of the (1 + 1) dimensional NLS equations. This is completely different from the evolution characteristics of spatially coherent structures induced by bright solitons (including multi-solitons and lump solutions), with their shapes and amplitudes kept unchanged. The diagram shows the evolution characteristics of all kinds of resulting line rogue waves. The new excitation mechanism of line rogue waves revealed contributes to the new understanding of the coherent structure of high-dimensional nonlinear wave models.
-
Keywords:
- rogue wave /
- line rogue wave /
- two-dimensional self-similar transformation /
- nonlinear Schrödinger equation
[1] Onorato M, Osborne A R, Serio M, Bertone S 2001 Phys. Rev. Lett. 86 5831Google Scholar
[2] Kharif C, Pelinovsky E, Slunyaev A 2009 Rogue Waves in the Ocean. In: Advances in Geophysical and Environmental Mechanics and Mathematics (Berlin: Springer-Verlag)
[3] Adcock T A A, Taylor P H 2014 Rep. Prog. Phys. 77 105901Google Scholar
[4] Dudley J M, Genty G, Eggleton B J 2008 Opt. Express 16 3644Google Scholar
[5] Kasparian J, Bejot P, Wolf J P, Dudley J M 2009 Opt. Express 17 12070Google Scholar
[6] Shukla P K, Moslem W M 2012 Phys. Lett. A 376 1125Google Scholar
[7] Tsai Y Y, Tsai Y, Lin I 2016 Nature Phys. 12 573Google Scholar
[8] Bludov Y V, Konotop V V, Akhmediev N 2009 Phys. Rev. A 80 033610Google Scholar
[9] Vinayagam P S, Radha R, Porsezian K 2013 Phys. Rev. E 88 042906Google Scholar
[10] Ginzburg N S, Rozental R M, Sergeev A S, Fedotov A E, Zotova I V, Tarakanov V P 2017 Phys. Rev. Lett. 119 034801Google Scholar
[11] Hohmann R, Kuhl U, Stockmann H J, Kaplan L, Heller E J 2010 Phys. Rev. Lett. 104 093901Google Scholar
[12] Ganshin A N, Efimov V B, Kolmakov G V, Mezhov-Deglin L P, McClintock P V E 2008 Phys. Rev. Lett. 101 065303Google Scholar
[13] Stenflo L, Marklund M 2010 J. Plasma Phys. 76 293Google Scholar
[14] Hammani K, Kibler B, Finot C, Morin P, Millot G P 2011 Opt. Lett. 36 112Google Scholar
[15] Shats M, Punzmann H, Xia H 2010 Phys. Rev. Lett. 104 104503Google Scholar
[16] Yan Z Y 2011 Phys. Lett. A 375 4274
[17] Han J F, Liang T, Duan W S 2019 Euro. Phys. J. E 42 5Google Scholar
[18] Copus M G, Camley R E 2020 Phys. Rev. B 102 220410Google Scholar
[19] Dysthe K, Krogstad H, Muller P 2008 Ann. Rev. Flu. Mech. 40 287Google Scholar
[20] Benetazzo A, Ardhuin F, Bergamasco F, Cavaleri L, Guimarães P V, Schwendeman M, Sclavo M, Thomson J, Torsello A 2017 Sci. Rep. 7 8276
[21] Peregrine D H 1983 J. Aust. Math. Soc. B 25 16Google Scholar
[22] Akhmediev N, Korneev V I 1986 Theor. Math. Phys. 69 1089Google Scholar
[23] Kuznetsov E 1977 Sov. Phys. Dokl. 22 507Google Scholar
[24] Ma Y C 1979 Stud. Appl. Math. 60 43
[25] Akhmediev N, Ankiewicz A, Soto-Crespo J M 2009 Phys. Rev. E 80 026601Google Scholar
[26] He J S, Zhang H R, Wang L H, Porsezian K, Fokas A S 2013 Phys. Rev. E 87 052914Google Scholar
[27] Dubard P, Matveev V B 2011 Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci. 11 667Google Scholar
[28] Ankiewicz A, Clarkson P A, Akhmediev N 2010 J. Phys. A 43 122002Google Scholar
[29] Kedziora D J, Ankiewicz A, Akhmediev N 2011 Phys. Rev. E 84 056611Google Scholar
[30] Zhao L C, Guo B, Ling L 2016 J. Math. Phys. 57 043508Google Scholar
[31] Onorato M, Residori S, Bortolozzo U, Montina A, Arecchi F 2013 Phys. Rep. 528 47Google Scholar
[32] Soto-Crespo J M, Devine N, Akhmediev N 2016 Phys. Rev. Lett. 116 103901Google Scholar
[33] Akhmediev N, Dudley J M, Solli D R, Turitsyn S K 2013 J. Opt. 15 060201Google Scholar
[34] Ohta Y, Yang J K 2012 Proc. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. A 468 1716Google Scholar
[35] Christian K, Efim P 2003 Euro. J. Mech. B Fluids 22 603
[36] Wang L H, He J S, Xu H, Wang J, Porsezian K 2017 Phys. Rev. E 95 042217Google Scholar
[37] Dudley J M, Dias F, Erkintalo M, Genty G 2014 Nature Photo. 8 755Google Scholar
[38] Zhang X E, Chen Y, Tang X Y 2018 Comput. Math. Appl. 76 1938Google Scholar
[39] Chen J C, Chen Y, Feng B F, Maruno K, Ohta Y 2018 J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 87 094007Google Scholar
[40] Wang M M, Chen Y 2021 Nonlinear Dyn. 104 2621Google Scholar
[41] Wang M M, Chen Y 2021 Nonlinear Dyn. 98 1781Google Scholar
[42] Birkholz S, Nibbering E T J 2013 Phys. Rev. Lett. 111 243903Google Scholar
[43] Solli D R Ropers C, Koonath P, Jalali B 2007 Nature 450 1054Google Scholar
[44] Solli D R, Ropers C, Jalali B 2008 Phys. Rev. Lett. 101 233902Google Scholar
[45] Kibler B, Fatome J, Finot C, Millot G, Genty G, Wetzel B, Akhmediev N, Dias F, Dudley J M 2012 Sci. Rep. 2 463Google Scholar
[46] Chabchoub A, Hoffmannn N P, Akhmediev N 2011 Phys. Rev. Lett. 106 204502Google Scholar
[47] Bailung H, Sharma S K, Nakamura Y 2011 Phys. Rev. Lett. 107 255005Google Scholar
[48] Xiong H, Gan J H, Wu Y 2017 Phys. Rev. Lett. 119 153901Google Scholar
[49] 张解放, 金美贞, 胡文成 2020 69 244205Google Scholar
Zhang J F, Jin M Z, Hu W C 2020 Acta Phys. Sin. 69 244205Google Scholar
[50] 张解放, 金美贞 2020 69 214203Google Scholar
Zhang J F, Jin M Z 2020 Acta Phys. Sin. 69 214203Google Scholar
[51] Martin D U, Yuen H C 1980 Wave Motion 2 215Google Scholar
[52] Carter J D, Segur H 2003 Phys. Rev. E 68 045601Google Scholar
[53] Manakov S V 1974 Sov. Phys. JETP 38 248
[54] Pecseli H L 1985 IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci. 13 53Google Scholar
[55] Gross E P 1963 J. Math Phys. 4 195Google Scholar
[56] Pitaevskii L P 1961 Sov. Phys. JETP 13 451Google Scholar
[57] Benney D J, Roskes G J 1969 Stud. Appl. Math. 48 377Google Scholar
[58] Myra J R and Liu C S 1980 Phys. Fluids 23 2258Google Scholar
[59] Gorza S P, Roig N 2004 Phys. Rev. Lett. 92 084101Google Scholar
[60] Gorza S P, Kockaert P, Emplit P, Haelterman M 2009 Phys. Rev. Lett. 102 13410Google Scholar
[61] Fermann M E 2000 Phys. Rev. Lett. 84 6010Google Scholar
[62] Ankiewicz A, Kedziora D J, Akhmediev N 2011 Phys. Lett. A 375 2782Google Scholar
[63] Kedziora D J, Ankiewicz A, Akhmediev N 2012 Phys. Rev. E 86 056602Google Scholar
[64] Ohta Y, Yang J K 2012 Proc. R. Soc. A 468 1716Google Scholar
[65] Kimmoun O, Hsu H C, Branger H, Li M S, Chen Y Y, Kharif C, Onorato M, Kelleher E J R, Kibler B, Akhmediev N, Chabchoub A 2016 Sci. Rep. 6 8516Google Scholar
-
图 1 一阶单线怪波(28)在
$ (x, y) $ -平面上随$ t $ 的演化图: (a)$ t = - 3 $ ; (b)$ t = 0 $ ; (c)$ t = 5 $ , 自由参数选取为$\alpha = \beta = \lambda = 1,$ $\gamma = 2, {\kappa _0} = {\iota _0} = - {a_0} = {{ {b}}_0} = 1$ Figure 1. Evolution plots of the first-order single line-rogue wave (28) with the
$ t $ on the$ (x, y) $ -plane. (a)$ t = - 3 $ ; (b)$ t = 0 $ ; (c)$ t = 5 $ . The free parameters are chosen as$ \alpha = \beta = 1, $ $\gamma = 2, {\kappa _0} = {\iota _0} = -{a_0} = {{ {b}}_0} = 1$ 图 2 二阶单线怪波(29)在
$ (x, y) $ -平面上随$ t $ 的演化图: (a)$ t = - 3 $ ; (b)$ t = 0 $ ; (c)$ t = 5 $ , 自由参数选取为$ \alpha = \beta = \lambda = 1, $ $\gamma = 2, {\kappa _0} = {\iota _0} = -{a_0} = {{{b}}_0} = 1$ ,$ {\xi _d} = {\tau _d} = 0 $ Figure 2. Evolution plots of the second-order single line-rogue wave (29) with the
$ t $ on the$ (x, y) $ -plane. (a)$ t = - 3 $ ; (b)$ t = $ $ 0 $ ; (c)$ t = 5 $ . The free parameters are chosen as$ \alpha = \beta = 1, $ $\gamma = 2, {\kappa _0} = {\iota _0} = -{a_0} = {{{b}}_0} = 1, {\xi _d} = {\tau _d} = 0$ 图 3 双线怪波(37)在
$ (x, y) $ -平面上随$ t $ 的演化图: (a)$ t = - 3 $ ; (b)$ t = 0 $ ; (c)$ t = 5 $ , 自由参数选取为$\alpha = $ $ \beta = \lambda = 1,$ $\gamma = 2, {\kappa _0} = {\iota _0} = -{a_0} = {{ {b}}_0} = 1$ ,$\delta = 25, \mu = 100$ Figure 3. Evolution plots of the double line-rogue wave (37) with
$ t $ on the$ (x, y) $ -plane. (a)$ t = - 3 $ ; (b)$ t = 0 $ ; (c)$ t = 5 $ .The free parameters are chosen as$ \alpha = \beta = 1, $ $\gamma = 2,~ {\kappa _0} = {\iota _0} = -{a_0} = {{ {b}}_0} = 1, ~\delta = 25, \mu = 100$ 图 4 多线怪波(38)在
$ (x, y) $ -平面上随$ t $ 的演化图: (a)$ t = - 3 $ ; (b)$ t = 0 $ ; (c)$ t = 5 $ , 自由参数选取为$ \alpha = \beta = \lambda = 1, $ $\gamma = 2, {\kappa _0} = {\iota _0} = -{a_0} = {{ {b}}_0} = 1$ ,$a = 0.45$ Figure 4. Evolution plots of the multi-line rogue wave (38) with
$ t $ on the$ (x, y) $ -plane. (a)$ t = - 3 $ ; (b)$ t = 0 $ ; (c)$ t = 5 $ . The free parameters are chosen as$ \alpha = \beta = 1, $ $\gamma = 2, {\kappa _0} = {\iota _0} = -{a_0} = {{ {b}}_0} = 1, a = 0.45$ 图 5 线怪波(39)在
$ (x, y) $ -平面上随$ t $ 的演化图 (a)$ t = - 3 $ , (b)$ t = 0 $ , (c)$ t = 5 $ , 自由参数选取为$ \alpha = \beta = \lambda = 1, $ $\gamma = 2, $ $ {\kappa _0} = {\iota _0} = -{a_0} = {{ {b}}_0} = 1$ ,$a = 0.45$ Figure 5. Evolution plots of the line rogue waves (39) with
$ t $ on the$ (x, y) $ -plane. (a)$ t = - 3 $ ; (b)$ t = 0 $ ; (c)$ t = 5 $ . The free parameters are chosen as$ \alpha = \beta = 1, $ $\gamma = 2, {\kappa _0} = {\iota _0} = -{a_0} = {{ {b}}_0} = 1, a = 0.45$ -
[1] Onorato M, Osborne A R, Serio M, Bertone S 2001 Phys. Rev. Lett. 86 5831Google Scholar
[2] Kharif C, Pelinovsky E, Slunyaev A 2009 Rogue Waves in the Ocean. In: Advances in Geophysical and Environmental Mechanics and Mathematics (Berlin: Springer-Verlag)
[3] Adcock T A A, Taylor P H 2014 Rep. Prog. Phys. 77 105901Google Scholar
[4] Dudley J M, Genty G, Eggleton B J 2008 Opt. Express 16 3644Google Scholar
[5] Kasparian J, Bejot P, Wolf J P, Dudley J M 2009 Opt. Express 17 12070Google Scholar
[6] Shukla P K, Moslem W M 2012 Phys. Lett. A 376 1125Google Scholar
[7] Tsai Y Y, Tsai Y, Lin I 2016 Nature Phys. 12 573Google Scholar
[8] Bludov Y V, Konotop V V, Akhmediev N 2009 Phys. Rev. A 80 033610Google Scholar
[9] Vinayagam P S, Radha R, Porsezian K 2013 Phys. Rev. E 88 042906Google Scholar
[10] Ginzburg N S, Rozental R M, Sergeev A S, Fedotov A E, Zotova I V, Tarakanov V P 2017 Phys. Rev. Lett. 119 034801Google Scholar
[11] Hohmann R, Kuhl U, Stockmann H J, Kaplan L, Heller E J 2010 Phys. Rev. Lett. 104 093901Google Scholar
[12] Ganshin A N, Efimov V B, Kolmakov G V, Mezhov-Deglin L P, McClintock P V E 2008 Phys. Rev. Lett. 101 065303Google Scholar
[13] Stenflo L, Marklund M 2010 J. Plasma Phys. 76 293Google Scholar
[14] Hammani K, Kibler B, Finot C, Morin P, Millot G P 2011 Opt. Lett. 36 112Google Scholar
[15] Shats M, Punzmann H, Xia H 2010 Phys. Rev. Lett. 104 104503Google Scholar
[16] Yan Z Y 2011 Phys. Lett. A 375 4274
[17] Han J F, Liang T, Duan W S 2019 Euro. Phys. J. E 42 5Google Scholar
[18] Copus M G, Camley R E 2020 Phys. Rev. B 102 220410Google Scholar
[19] Dysthe K, Krogstad H, Muller P 2008 Ann. Rev. Flu. Mech. 40 287Google Scholar
[20] Benetazzo A, Ardhuin F, Bergamasco F, Cavaleri L, Guimarães P V, Schwendeman M, Sclavo M, Thomson J, Torsello A 2017 Sci. Rep. 7 8276
[21] Peregrine D H 1983 J. Aust. Math. Soc. B 25 16Google Scholar
[22] Akhmediev N, Korneev V I 1986 Theor. Math. Phys. 69 1089Google Scholar
[23] Kuznetsov E 1977 Sov. Phys. Dokl. 22 507Google Scholar
[24] Ma Y C 1979 Stud. Appl. Math. 60 43
[25] Akhmediev N, Ankiewicz A, Soto-Crespo J M 2009 Phys. Rev. E 80 026601Google Scholar
[26] He J S, Zhang H R, Wang L H, Porsezian K, Fokas A S 2013 Phys. Rev. E 87 052914Google Scholar
[27] Dubard P, Matveev V B 2011 Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci. 11 667Google Scholar
[28] Ankiewicz A, Clarkson P A, Akhmediev N 2010 J. Phys. A 43 122002Google Scholar
[29] Kedziora D J, Ankiewicz A, Akhmediev N 2011 Phys. Rev. E 84 056611Google Scholar
[30] Zhao L C, Guo B, Ling L 2016 J. Math. Phys. 57 043508Google Scholar
[31] Onorato M, Residori S, Bortolozzo U, Montina A, Arecchi F 2013 Phys. Rep. 528 47Google Scholar
[32] Soto-Crespo J M, Devine N, Akhmediev N 2016 Phys. Rev. Lett. 116 103901Google Scholar
[33] Akhmediev N, Dudley J M, Solli D R, Turitsyn S K 2013 J. Opt. 15 060201Google Scholar
[34] Ohta Y, Yang J K 2012 Proc. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. A 468 1716Google Scholar
[35] Christian K, Efim P 2003 Euro. J. Mech. B Fluids 22 603
[36] Wang L H, He J S, Xu H, Wang J, Porsezian K 2017 Phys. Rev. E 95 042217Google Scholar
[37] Dudley J M, Dias F, Erkintalo M, Genty G 2014 Nature Photo. 8 755Google Scholar
[38] Zhang X E, Chen Y, Tang X Y 2018 Comput. Math. Appl. 76 1938Google Scholar
[39] Chen J C, Chen Y, Feng B F, Maruno K, Ohta Y 2018 J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 87 094007Google Scholar
[40] Wang M M, Chen Y 2021 Nonlinear Dyn. 104 2621Google Scholar
[41] Wang M M, Chen Y 2021 Nonlinear Dyn. 98 1781Google Scholar
[42] Birkholz S, Nibbering E T J 2013 Phys. Rev. Lett. 111 243903Google Scholar
[43] Solli D R Ropers C, Koonath P, Jalali B 2007 Nature 450 1054Google Scholar
[44] Solli D R, Ropers C, Jalali B 2008 Phys. Rev. Lett. 101 233902Google Scholar
[45] Kibler B, Fatome J, Finot C, Millot G, Genty G, Wetzel B, Akhmediev N, Dias F, Dudley J M 2012 Sci. Rep. 2 463Google Scholar
[46] Chabchoub A, Hoffmannn N P, Akhmediev N 2011 Phys. Rev. Lett. 106 204502Google Scholar
[47] Bailung H, Sharma S K, Nakamura Y 2011 Phys. Rev. Lett. 107 255005Google Scholar
[48] Xiong H, Gan J H, Wu Y 2017 Phys. Rev. Lett. 119 153901Google Scholar
[49] 张解放, 金美贞, 胡文成 2020 69 244205Google Scholar
Zhang J F, Jin M Z, Hu W C 2020 Acta Phys. Sin. 69 244205Google Scholar
[50] 张解放, 金美贞 2020 69 214203Google Scholar
Zhang J F, Jin M Z 2020 Acta Phys. Sin. 69 214203Google Scholar
[51] Martin D U, Yuen H C 1980 Wave Motion 2 215Google Scholar
[52] Carter J D, Segur H 2003 Phys. Rev. E 68 045601Google Scholar
[53] Manakov S V 1974 Sov. Phys. JETP 38 248
[54] Pecseli H L 1985 IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci. 13 53Google Scholar
[55] Gross E P 1963 J. Math Phys. 4 195Google Scholar
[56] Pitaevskii L P 1961 Sov. Phys. JETP 13 451Google Scholar
[57] Benney D J, Roskes G J 1969 Stud. Appl. Math. 48 377Google Scholar
[58] Myra J R and Liu C S 1980 Phys. Fluids 23 2258Google Scholar
[59] Gorza S P, Roig N 2004 Phys. Rev. Lett. 92 084101Google Scholar
[60] Gorza S P, Kockaert P, Emplit P, Haelterman M 2009 Phys. Rev. Lett. 102 13410Google Scholar
[61] Fermann M E 2000 Phys. Rev. Lett. 84 6010Google Scholar
[62] Ankiewicz A, Kedziora D J, Akhmediev N 2011 Phys. Lett. A 375 2782Google Scholar
[63] Kedziora D J, Ankiewicz A, Akhmediev N 2012 Phys. Rev. E 86 056602Google Scholar
[64] Ohta Y, Yang J K 2012 Proc. R. Soc. A 468 1716Google Scholar
[65] Kimmoun O, Hsu H C, Branger H, Li M S, Chen Y Y, Kharif C, Onorato M, Kelleher E J R, Kibler B, Akhmediev N, Chabchoub A 2016 Sci. Rep. 6 8516Google Scholar
Catalog
Metrics
- Abstract views: 4259
- PDF Downloads: 74
- Cited By: 0