-
The interaction between noble metal nanowires can induce the local surface plasmonic resonance effect, thereby enhancing the distribution of electric field in the nanostructures, which is of very important significance in improving the fluorescence characteristics and enhancing the sensitivity of sensors. In this study, we design several types of tetramers based on precious metals Ag nanostructures, including cylindrical and prismatic Ag tetramers, and by changing the arrangement and the rotation angle of prism nanowires, we simulate the rotation-angle dependent electric field distribution and electric field intensity of X component , and also discuss the physical mechanism of the relationship between the resonant peak position of absorption spectrum and the change of mode volume. The results show that in the Ag nanowires tetramer structure, the electric field in the cylindrical structure is not enhanced obviously, but the electric field in the prismatic structure is greatly enhanced, and an electric dipole resonance mode is produced in the gap between tetramers. The polarization of plasma resonant cavity revels that the morphology plays a decisive role in generating the hot spots, After changing both the combination mode of tetramer nanowires and the rotation angle of the four-prism, the local surface exciton resonance of the unrotated asymmetric tetramer structure is most ideal and has resonance intensity higher than the that of symmetrical four-prism structure. Therefore, our results provide a structural model and theoretical parameters for the enhancement of electric field intensity by local surface plasmon resonance effect.
-
Keywords:
- Ag nanowire tetramer /
- electric dipole resonance /
- plasma resonance cavity /
- local surface plasmon resonance effect
[1] Bachelier G, Russier A I, Benichou E, Jonin C, Del F N, Valle'e F, Brevet P F 2008 Phys. Rev. Lett. 101 19740
[2] 洪昕, 杜丹丹, 裘祖荣, 张国雄 2007 56 7219Google Scholar
Hong X, Du D D, Qiu Z R, Zhang G Q 2007 Acta Phys. Sin. 56 7219Google Scholar
[3] Xia M, Zhang P, Qiao K, Bai Y, Xie Y H 2015 J. Phys. Chem. C 120 527
[4] Cathcart N, Chen J I L, Kitaev V 2018 Langmuir 34 612Google Scholar
[5] Bingham J M, Willets K A, Shah N C, Andrews D Q, Van Duyne R P 2009 J. Phys. Chem. C 113 16839Google Scholar
[6] Sherry L J, Chang S H, Schatz G C, Duyne R P V, Wiley B J, Xia Y N 2005 Nano Lett. 5 2034Google Scholar
[7] 徐天宁, 李翔, 贾文旺, 隋成华, 吴惠桢 2015 64 245201Google Scholar
Xu T N, Li X, Jia W W, Sui C H, Wu H Z 2015 Acta Phys. Sin. 64 245201Google Scholar
[8] Hou H, Chen L M, He H L, Chen L Z, Zhao Z L, Jin Y D 2015 J. Mater. Chem. B 3 5189
[9] Mahmud S, Satter S S, Singh A K, Rahman M M, Mollah M Y A, Hasan Susan M A B 2019 ACS Omega 4 18061Google Scholar
[10] Fernandez-Domınguez A I, Wiener A, García-Vidal F J, Maier S A, Pendry J B 2012 Phys. Rev. Lett. 108 106802Google Scholar
[11] Kessentini S, Barchiesi D, D’Andrea C, Toma A, Guillot N, Fabrizio E D, Fazio B, Maragó O M, Gucciardi P G, de la Chapelle M L 2014 J. Phys. Chem. C 118 3209Google Scholar
[12] Khurgin J B, Tsai W Y, Tsai D P, Sun G 2017 ACS Photonics 4 2871Google Scholar
[13] Kanipe K N, Chidester P P F, Stucky G D, Meinhart C D, Moskovits M 2017 J. Phys. Chem. C 121 14269Google Scholar
[14] Khoury C G, Norton S J, Vo-Dinh T 2009 ACS Nano 3 2776Google Scholar
[15] Tserkezis C, Wubs M, Mortensen N A 2018 ACS Photonics 5 133Google Scholar
[16] Li G L, Chen H X, Ding J J 2020 Mod. Phys. Lett. B 35 2150203
[17] Deepak K S, Adrian A, Julien B, Gérard C D F, Kumar P G V, Alexandre B 2020 Phys. Rev. B 102 115414Google Scholar
[18] Alexandre A, Dang Y L, Stefan A. M, Pendry J B 2011 ACS Nano 5 3293Google Scholar
[19] Bai F, Li M C, Fu P F, Li R K, Gu T S, Huang R, Chen Z, Jiang B, Li Y F 2015 APL Materials 3 056101Google Scholar
[20] Pinchuk A, Kreibig U 2003 New J. Phys. 5 151Google Scholar
[21] Tamitake I, Yuko S Y, Yasutaka K, Jeyadevan B 2017 Phys. Rev. B 95 115441Google Scholar
[22] Park S M, Lee K S, Kim J H, Yeon G J, Shin H H, Park S, Kim Z H 2020 J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 11 9313Google Scholar
[23] Beverly Z P, Dmitri D T, Akira K, Ludwig B 1998 J. Phys. Chem. B 102 752Google Scholar
-
图 6 不同结构Ag四聚体共振吸收谱 (a) 未旋转圆柱形四聚体与棱柱形四聚体; (b) 未旋转C3Q1, C2Q2-Ⅰ, C2Q2-Ⅱ, C1Q3四聚体; (c) C3Q1, C2Q2-Ⅰ, C2Q2-Ⅱ结构中棱柱纳米线旋转15°四聚体; (d) C1Q3-up, C1Q3-down, Q4结构中棱柱纳米线旋转15°四聚体
Figure 6. Resonance absorption spectra of Ag tetramers with different structures: (a) Unrotated cylindrical tetramers and prismatic tetramers; (b) unrotated C3Q1, C2Q2-Ⅰ, C2Q2-Ⅱ, C1Q3tetramer; (c) prism nanowires rotated 15° in C3Q1, C2Q2-Ⅰ, C2Q2-Ⅱ structure; (d) prism nanowires rotated 15° in C1Q3-up, C1Q3-down, Q4 structure.
-
[1] Bachelier G, Russier A I, Benichou E, Jonin C, Del F N, Valle'e F, Brevet P F 2008 Phys. Rev. Lett. 101 19740
[2] 洪昕, 杜丹丹, 裘祖荣, 张国雄 2007 56 7219Google Scholar
Hong X, Du D D, Qiu Z R, Zhang G Q 2007 Acta Phys. Sin. 56 7219Google Scholar
[3] Xia M, Zhang P, Qiao K, Bai Y, Xie Y H 2015 J. Phys. Chem. C 120 527
[4] Cathcart N, Chen J I L, Kitaev V 2018 Langmuir 34 612Google Scholar
[5] Bingham J M, Willets K A, Shah N C, Andrews D Q, Van Duyne R P 2009 J. Phys. Chem. C 113 16839Google Scholar
[6] Sherry L J, Chang S H, Schatz G C, Duyne R P V, Wiley B J, Xia Y N 2005 Nano Lett. 5 2034Google Scholar
[7] 徐天宁, 李翔, 贾文旺, 隋成华, 吴惠桢 2015 64 245201Google Scholar
Xu T N, Li X, Jia W W, Sui C H, Wu H Z 2015 Acta Phys. Sin. 64 245201Google Scholar
[8] Hou H, Chen L M, He H L, Chen L Z, Zhao Z L, Jin Y D 2015 J. Mater. Chem. B 3 5189
[9] Mahmud S, Satter S S, Singh A K, Rahman M M, Mollah M Y A, Hasan Susan M A B 2019 ACS Omega 4 18061Google Scholar
[10] Fernandez-Domınguez A I, Wiener A, García-Vidal F J, Maier S A, Pendry J B 2012 Phys. Rev. Lett. 108 106802Google Scholar
[11] Kessentini S, Barchiesi D, D’Andrea C, Toma A, Guillot N, Fabrizio E D, Fazio B, Maragó O M, Gucciardi P G, de la Chapelle M L 2014 J. Phys. Chem. C 118 3209Google Scholar
[12] Khurgin J B, Tsai W Y, Tsai D P, Sun G 2017 ACS Photonics 4 2871Google Scholar
[13] Kanipe K N, Chidester P P F, Stucky G D, Meinhart C D, Moskovits M 2017 J. Phys. Chem. C 121 14269Google Scholar
[14] Khoury C G, Norton S J, Vo-Dinh T 2009 ACS Nano 3 2776Google Scholar
[15] Tserkezis C, Wubs M, Mortensen N A 2018 ACS Photonics 5 133Google Scholar
[16] Li G L, Chen H X, Ding J J 2020 Mod. Phys. Lett. B 35 2150203
[17] Deepak K S, Adrian A, Julien B, Gérard C D F, Kumar P G V, Alexandre B 2020 Phys. Rev. B 102 115414Google Scholar
[18] Alexandre A, Dang Y L, Stefan A. M, Pendry J B 2011 ACS Nano 5 3293Google Scholar
[19] Bai F, Li M C, Fu P F, Li R K, Gu T S, Huang R, Chen Z, Jiang B, Li Y F 2015 APL Materials 3 056101Google Scholar
[20] Pinchuk A, Kreibig U 2003 New J. Phys. 5 151Google Scholar
[21] Tamitake I, Yuko S Y, Yasutaka K, Jeyadevan B 2017 Phys. Rev. B 95 115441Google Scholar
[22] Park S M, Lee K S, Kim J H, Yeon G J, Shin H H, Park S, Kim Z H 2020 J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 11 9313Google Scholar
[23] Beverly Z P, Dmitri D T, Akira K, Ludwig B 1998 J. Phys. Chem. B 102 752Google Scholar
Catalog
Metrics
- Abstract views: 5164
- PDF Downloads: 78
- Cited By: 0