-
Owing to challenges encountered by mesh-based CFD methods when simulating large material deformation, a number of meshfree methods have been presented. The optimized transportation meshfree method is a newly developed meshfree method, but it inherits the advantage of the finite element method in boundary treatment and thus having great potential applications in surface tension effect simulation. By adding the surface tension potential into the Lagrangian, the resulting generalized force acts on fluid surfaces exactly. The axial symmetry treatment is also discussed. By simulating several benchmark cases such as two- and three-dimensional Poiseuille flow, static and vibrating drop and drop deformation, the advantages like precision and convergence of the optimized transportation meshfree method in simulating surface tension effect are verified.
-
Keywords:
- optimized transportation meshfree method /
- surface tension /
- Lagrangian equations /
- axial symmetry
[1] Wang H, Zhang Z Y, Yang Y M, Zhang H S 2010 Chin. Phys. B 19 026801Google Scholar
[2] Annaland M, Deen N G, Kuipers J A M 2005 Chem. Eng. Sci. 60 2999Google Scholar
[3] Croce R, Griebel M, Schweitzer M A 2010 Int. J. Numer. Meth. Fl. 62 963
[4] Liu G R, Liu M B 2003 Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics: AMeshfree Particle Method (Singapore: World Scientific)
[5] Liu M B, Liu G R, Zong Z 2008 Int. J. Comput. Methods 5 135Google Scholar
[6] Alexandre M T, Kim F F, Paul M 2009 Comput. Phys. Commun. 18 01874Google Scholar
[7] Zhou G Z, Ge W, Li J H 2008 Powder Technol. 183 21Google Scholar
[8] Alexandre T, Paul M 2005 Phys. Rev. E 72 026301
[9] 马理强, 常建忠, 刘汉涛, 刘谋斌 2012 61 054701Google Scholar
Ma L Q, Chang J Z, Liu H T, Liu M B 2012 Acta Phys. Sin. 61 054701Google Scholar
[10] 白玲, 李大鸣, 李彦卿, 王志超, 李杨杨 2015 64 114701Google Scholar
Bai L, Li D M, Li Y Q, Wang Z C, Li Y Y 2015 Acta Phys. Sin. 64 114701Google Scholar
[11] Brackbill J U, Kothe D B, Zemach C 1992 J. Comput. Phys. 100 354Google Scholar
[12] 蒋涛, 陆林广, 陆伟刚 2013 62 224701Google Scholar
Jiang T, Lu L G, Lu W G 2013 Acta Phys. Sin. 62 224701Google Scholar
[13] Chen J K, Beraun J E 2000 Comp. Meth. Appl. Mech. Eng. 190 225Google Scholar
[14] Li B, Habbal F, Ortiz M 2010 Powder Technology 83 1541
[15] Sukumar N 2004 Int. J. Numer. Meth. Engineer. 612 159Google Scholar
[16] Arroyo M, Ortiz M 2006 Int. J. Numer. Meth. Engineer. 652 167
[17] Sukumar N, Wright R W 2007 Int. J. Numer. Meth. Engineer. 70 181Google Scholar
[18] Li B, Kidane A, Ravichandran G, Ortiz M 2012 Int. J. Impact Eng. 42 25Google Scholar
[19] Li B, Perotti L, Adams M, Mihaly J, Rosakis A J, Stalzer M, Ortiz M 2013 Procedia Eng. 58 320Google Scholar
[20] Li B, Stalzer M, Ortiz M 2014 Int. J. Numer. Meth. Eng. 100 40Google Scholar
[21] 张天龙, 马天宝, 郝莉 2021 兵器装备工程学报 42 144Google Scholar
Zhang T L, Ma T B, Hao L 2021 J. Ordnance Equip. Eng. 42 144Google Scholar
[22] Li B, Pandolfi A, Ortiz M 2015 Mechanics of Materials 80 288Google Scholar
[23] Fedeli L, Pandolfi A, Ortiz M 2017 Int. J. Numer. Meth. Eng. 112 1905Google Scholar
[24] Morris J P, Fox P J, Zhu Y 1997 J. Comput. Phys. 136 214Google Scholar
[25] Leonardo D G S, Jaime K, Eloy S, Yasmin M, Anwar H 2003 J. Comput. Phys. 191 622Google Scholar
[26] Hu X Y, Adams N A 2006 J. Comput. Phys. 213 844Google Scholar
[27] Tadashi W 2008 WSEAS Transactions on Fluid Mechanics 3 164
-
-
[1] Wang H, Zhang Z Y, Yang Y M, Zhang H S 2010 Chin. Phys. B 19 026801Google Scholar
[2] Annaland M, Deen N G, Kuipers J A M 2005 Chem. Eng. Sci. 60 2999Google Scholar
[3] Croce R, Griebel M, Schweitzer M A 2010 Int. J. Numer. Meth. Fl. 62 963
[4] Liu G R, Liu M B 2003 Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics: AMeshfree Particle Method (Singapore: World Scientific)
[5] Liu M B, Liu G R, Zong Z 2008 Int. J. Comput. Methods 5 135Google Scholar
[6] Alexandre M T, Kim F F, Paul M 2009 Comput. Phys. Commun. 18 01874Google Scholar
[7] Zhou G Z, Ge W, Li J H 2008 Powder Technol. 183 21Google Scholar
[8] Alexandre T, Paul M 2005 Phys. Rev. E 72 026301
[9] 马理强, 常建忠, 刘汉涛, 刘谋斌 2012 61 054701Google Scholar
Ma L Q, Chang J Z, Liu H T, Liu M B 2012 Acta Phys. Sin. 61 054701Google Scholar
[10] 白玲, 李大鸣, 李彦卿, 王志超, 李杨杨 2015 64 114701Google Scholar
Bai L, Li D M, Li Y Q, Wang Z C, Li Y Y 2015 Acta Phys. Sin. 64 114701Google Scholar
[11] Brackbill J U, Kothe D B, Zemach C 1992 J. Comput. Phys. 100 354Google Scholar
[12] 蒋涛, 陆林广, 陆伟刚 2013 62 224701Google Scholar
Jiang T, Lu L G, Lu W G 2013 Acta Phys. Sin. 62 224701Google Scholar
[13] Chen J K, Beraun J E 2000 Comp. Meth. Appl. Mech. Eng. 190 225Google Scholar
[14] Li B, Habbal F, Ortiz M 2010 Powder Technology 83 1541
[15] Sukumar N 2004 Int. J. Numer. Meth. Engineer. 612 159Google Scholar
[16] Arroyo M, Ortiz M 2006 Int. J. Numer. Meth. Engineer. 652 167
[17] Sukumar N, Wright R W 2007 Int. J. Numer. Meth. Engineer. 70 181Google Scholar
[18] Li B, Kidane A, Ravichandran G, Ortiz M 2012 Int. J. Impact Eng. 42 25Google Scholar
[19] Li B, Perotti L, Adams M, Mihaly J, Rosakis A J, Stalzer M, Ortiz M 2013 Procedia Eng. 58 320Google Scholar
[20] Li B, Stalzer M, Ortiz M 2014 Int. J. Numer. Meth. Eng. 100 40Google Scholar
[21] 张天龙, 马天宝, 郝莉 2021 兵器装备工程学报 42 144Google Scholar
Zhang T L, Ma T B, Hao L 2021 J. Ordnance Equip. Eng. 42 144Google Scholar
[22] Li B, Pandolfi A, Ortiz M 2015 Mechanics of Materials 80 288Google Scholar
[23] Fedeli L, Pandolfi A, Ortiz M 2017 Int. J. Numer. Meth. Eng. 112 1905Google Scholar
[24] Morris J P, Fox P J, Zhu Y 1997 J. Comput. Phys. 136 214Google Scholar
[25] Leonardo D G S, Jaime K, Eloy S, Yasmin M, Anwar H 2003 J. Comput. Phys. 191 622Google Scholar
[26] Hu X Y, Adams N A 2006 J. Comput. Phys. 213 844Google Scholar
[27] Tadashi W 2008 WSEAS Transactions on Fluid Mechanics 3 164
Catalog
Metrics
- Abstract views: 5947
- PDF Downloads: 83
- Cited By: 0