Search

Article

x

留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

The protection of qudit states by weak measurement

Huang Jiang

Citation:

The protection of qudit states by weak measurement

Huang Jiang
PDF
Get Citation

(PLEASE TRANSLATE TO ENGLISH

BY GOOGLE TRANSLATE IF NEEDED.)

  • Liao Xiang-Ping et al.(Chin. Phys. B 23 020304, 2014) pointed out that the method of weak measurement and quantum weak measurement reversal can protect entanglement and improve the fidelity of three-qubit quantum state. We generalize the method of weak measurement to the case of qudit state in this paper. By using the operation of weak measurement and quantum weak measurement reversal, we investigate the evolution dynamics of fidelity and fidelity improvement for qudit state under amplitude damping decoherence. We compare two kinds of operations: one is to let the input qudit state cross the amplitude damping decoherence directly, and the other one is that we first make a weak measurement operation on the input qudit state, then through the amplitude damping decoherence, finally an operation of quantum weak measurement reversal is done with the output qudit state. We discuss the GHZ state, W state, CL state and some special separable states exactly and obtain the analytic expressions of fidelity and fidelity improvement for qudit state before and after the weak measurement and quantum weak measurement reversal operation. According to the analytic expressions we plot the evolution curves against its corresponding parameters. The effects of corresponding parameters are discussed and a susceptible protection region of the qudit state is also given in the context. The results show that the structure of qudit state is the determined factor to the effect of weak measurement and quantum weak measurement reversal. There are some different effects on the different structured qudit states. For entangled state, the fidelity of qudit GHZ state can be protected in a relatively big evolution region, most part of the fidelity improvement is in the upper part of the zero reference plane. While the fidelity of qudit W state can be improved effectively in the whole evolution region, which is a perfect protection. The evolution regulations of qudit CL state and Dick state are between evolution regulations of the GHZ state and W state. When we input some special separable qudit states which have similar structures to W state, their fidelity and fidelity improvement are almost the same as W state’s. It is demonstrated that the structure of qudit state is important for the weak measurement in a step. This work is meaningful for the quantum information process.
      Corresponding author: Huang Jiang, 940038299@qq.com
    • Funds: Project supported by the natural science foundation of Guangdong province(Grant No. 2015A030310354), and the Foundation of Excellent-Young-Backbone Teacher of Guangdong Ocean University, China.
    [1]

    Zhou S X 2002 Quantum Dynamics(Beijing:Higher Education Press) pp17-25(in Chinese)[周世勋2002量子力学(北京:高等教育出版社)第17–25页]

    [2]

    Einstein A, Podolsky B, Rosen N 1935 Phys. Rev. 47 777

    [3]

    Nielsen M A, Chuang I L 2002 Quantum Computation and Quantum Informatin(Cambridge:Cambridge University Press) pp74-89

    [4]

    Zeng H F, Shao B, Yang L G, Li J, Zou J 2008 Chin. Phys. B 18 3265

    [5]

    Sun G H, Aoki M A, Dong S H 2013 Chin. Phys. B 22 050302

    [6]

    Yu T, Eberly J H 2007 arXiv preprint arXiv:0707.3215

    [7]

    Zhang R, Qin H, Tang B, Xue P 2013 Chin. Phys. B 22 100301

    [8]

    Mazhar A, Alber G, Rau A R P 2009 J. Phys. B 42 025501

    [9]

    Mazhar A, Guhne O 2014 J. Phys. B 47 055503

    [10]

    Yu T, Eberly J H 2003 Phys. Rev. Lett. 97 140403

    [11]

    Simon C, Kempe J 2002 Phys. Rev. A 65 052327

    [12]

    López C E, Römero G, Lastra F, Solano E, Reamal J C 2008 Phys. Rev. Lett. 101 080503

    [13]

    Yu T, Eberly J H 2002 Phys. Rev. B 66 193306

    [14]

    Yu T, Eberly J H 2003 Phys. Rev. B 68 165322

    [15]

    Yu T, Eberly J H 2004 Phys. Rev. Lett. 93 140404

    [16]

    Yang B Y, Fang M F, Huang J 2013 Chin. Phys. B 22 080303

    [17]

    Pan J W, Gasparoni S, Ursin R, Weihs G, Zeilinger A 2003 Nature Phys. 423 1014

    [18]

    Xiao X, Fang M F, Li Y L, Zeng K, Wu C 2009 J. Phys. B:At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 42 235502

    [19]

    Huang J, Guo Y N, Xie Q 2016 Chin. Phys. B 25 0203032

    [20]

    Zou H M, Fang M F 2016 Chin. Phys. B 25 090302

    [21]

    Fan Z L, Ren Y K, Zeng H S 2016 Chin. Phys. B 25 010303

    [22]

    Han W, Jiang K X, Zhang Y J, Xia Y J 2015 Chin. Phys. B 24 120304

    [23]

    Mazhar A 2015 Chin. Phys. B 24 1203035

    [24]

    Mazhar A, Huang J 2014 Chin. Phys. Lett. 31 110301

    [25]

    Wang Z L, Wang Z, Fan H Y 2015 Chin. Phys. B 24 1203016

    [26]

    Yang Y B, Wang W G 2015 Chin. Phys. Lett. 32 030301

    [27]

    Shan C J, Xia Y J 2006 Acta Phys. Sin. 55 1585 (in Chinese)[单传家, 夏云杰2006 55 1585]

    [28]

    Zou Q, Hu X M, Liu J M 2015 Acta Phys. Sin. 64 080302 (in Chinese)[邹琴, 胡小勉, 刘金明2015 64 080302]

    [29]

    Korotkov A N 1999 Phys. Rev. B 60 5737

    [30]

    Katz N, Neeley M, Ansmann M, Radoslaw C B, Hofheinz M, Lucero E, Connell A, Wang H, Cleland A N, Martinis J M, Korotkov A N 2008 Phys. Rev. Lett. 101 200401

    [31]

    Korotkov A N, Jordan A N 2006 Phys. Rev. Lett. 97 166805

    [32]

    Kim Y S, Cho Y W, Ra Y S, Kim Y H 2009 Opt. Express 17 11978

    [33]

    Lee J C, Jeong Y C, Kim Y S, Kim Y H 2011 Opt. Express 19 16309

    [34]

    Xu X Y, Kedem Y, Sun K, Vaidman L, Li C F, Guo G C 2013 Phys. Rev. Lett. 111 033604

    [35]

    Katz N, Ansmann M, Bialczak R C, Lucero E, Mcdermott R, Neeley M, Steffen M, Weig E M, Cleland A N, Martinis J M, Korotkov A N 2006 Science 312 1498

    [36]

    Groen J P, Riste D, Tornberg L, CRömer J, Degroot P C, Picot T, Johansson G, Dicarlo L 2013 Phys. Rev. Lett. 111 090506

    [37]

    Korotkov A N, Keane K 2010 Phys. Rev. A 81 040103

    [38]

    Wang S C, Yu Z W, Wang X B 2014 Phys. Rev. A 89 022318

    [39]

    Sun Q Q, Amri M A, Zubairy M S 2009 Phys. Rev. A 80 033838

    [40]

    Kim Y S, Lee J C, Kwon O, Kim Y H 2012 Nature Phys. 8 117

    [41]

    Xiao X, Li Y L 2013 Eur. Phys. J. D 67 204

    [42]

    Liao X P, Fang M F, Fang J S, Zhu Q Q 2014 Chin. Phys. B 23 020304

    [43]

    Schumacher B W 1996 Phys. Rev. A 54 2614

    [44]

    Song X L, Yang M 2016 Acta Phys. Sin. 65 080303 (in Chinese)[宗晓岚, 杨名2016 65 080303]

    [45]

    Xiao X, Feng M 2011 Phys. Rev. A 83 054301

    [46]

    Jungnitsch B, Moroder T, Guhne O 2011 Phys. Rev. Lett. 106 190502

  • [1]

    Zhou S X 2002 Quantum Dynamics(Beijing:Higher Education Press) pp17-25(in Chinese)[周世勋2002量子力学(北京:高等教育出版社)第17–25页]

    [2]

    Einstein A, Podolsky B, Rosen N 1935 Phys. Rev. 47 777

    [3]

    Nielsen M A, Chuang I L 2002 Quantum Computation and Quantum Informatin(Cambridge:Cambridge University Press) pp74-89

    [4]

    Zeng H F, Shao B, Yang L G, Li J, Zou J 2008 Chin. Phys. B 18 3265

    [5]

    Sun G H, Aoki M A, Dong S H 2013 Chin. Phys. B 22 050302

    [6]

    Yu T, Eberly J H 2007 arXiv preprint arXiv:0707.3215

    [7]

    Zhang R, Qin H, Tang B, Xue P 2013 Chin. Phys. B 22 100301

    [8]

    Mazhar A, Alber G, Rau A R P 2009 J. Phys. B 42 025501

    [9]

    Mazhar A, Guhne O 2014 J. Phys. B 47 055503

    [10]

    Yu T, Eberly J H 2003 Phys. Rev. Lett. 97 140403

    [11]

    Simon C, Kempe J 2002 Phys. Rev. A 65 052327

    [12]

    López C E, Römero G, Lastra F, Solano E, Reamal J C 2008 Phys. Rev. Lett. 101 080503

    [13]

    Yu T, Eberly J H 2002 Phys. Rev. B 66 193306

    [14]

    Yu T, Eberly J H 2003 Phys. Rev. B 68 165322

    [15]

    Yu T, Eberly J H 2004 Phys. Rev. Lett. 93 140404

    [16]

    Yang B Y, Fang M F, Huang J 2013 Chin. Phys. B 22 080303

    [17]

    Pan J W, Gasparoni S, Ursin R, Weihs G, Zeilinger A 2003 Nature Phys. 423 1014

    [18]

    Xiao X, Fang M F, Li Y L, Zeng K, Wu C 2009 J. Phys. B:At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 42 235502

    [19]

    Huang J, Guo Y N, Xie Q 2016 Chin. Phys. B 25 0203032

    [20]

    Zou H M, Fang M F 2016 Chin. Phys. B 25 090302

    [21]

    Fan Z L, Ren Y K, Zeng H S 2016 Chin. Phys. B 25 010303

    [22]

    Han W, Jiang K X, Zhang Y J, Xia Y J 2015 Chin. Phys. B 24 120304

    [23]

    Mazhar A 2015 Chin. Phys. B 24 1203035

    [24]

    Mazhar A, Huang J 2014 Chin. Phys. Lett. 31 110301

    [25]

    Wang Z L, Wang Z, Fan H Y 2015 Chin. Phys. B 24 1203016

    [26]

    Yang Y B, Wang W G 2015 Chin. Phys. Lett. 32 030301

    [27]

    Shan C J, Xia Y J 2006 Acta Phys. Sin. 55 1585 (in Chinese)[单传家, 夏云杰2006 55 1585]

    [28]

    Zou Q, Hu X M, Liu J M 2015 Acta Phys. Sin. 64 080302 (in Chinese)[邹琴, 胡小勉, 刘金明2015 64 080302]

    [29]

    Korotkov A N 1999 Phys. Rev. B 60 5737

    [30]

    Katz N, Neeley M, Ansmann M, Radoslaw C B, Hofheinz M, Lucero E, Connell A, Wang H, Cleland A N, Martinis J M, Korotkov A N 2008 Phys. Rev. Lett. 101 200401

    [31]

    Korotkov A N, Jordan A N 2006 Phys. Rev. Lett. 97 166805

    [32]

    Kim Y S, Cho Y W, Ra Y S, Kim Y H 2009 Opt. Express 17 11978

    [33]

    Lee J C, Jeong Y C, Kim Y S, Kim Y H 2011 Opt. Express 19 16309

    [34]

    Xu X Y, Kedem Y, Sun K, Vaidman L, Li C F, Guo G C 2013 Phys. Rev. Lett. 111 033604

    [35]

    Katz N, Ansmann M, Bialczak R C, Lucero E, Mcdermott R, Neeley M, Steffen M, Weig E M, Cleland A N, Martinis J M, Korotkov A N 2006 Science 312 1498

    [36]

    Groen J P, Riste D, Tornberg L, CRömer J, Degroot P C, Picot T, Johansson G, Dicarlo L 2013 Phys. Rev. Lett. 111 090506

    [37]

    Korotkov A N, Keane K 2010 Phys. Rev. A 81 040103

    [38]

    Wang S C, Yu Z W, Wang X B 2014 Phys. Rev. A 89 022318

    [39]

    Sun Q Q, Amri M A, Zubairy M S 2009 Phys. Rev. A 80 033838

    [40]

    Kim Y S, Lee J C, Kwon O, Kim Y H 2012 Nature Phys. 8 117

    [41]

    Xiao X, Li Y L 2013 Eur. Phys. J. D 67 204

    [42]

    Liao X P, Fang M F, Fang J S, Zhu Q Q 2014 Chin. Phys. B 23 020304

    [43]

    Schumacher B W 1996 Phys. Rev. A 54 2614

    [44]

    Song X L, Yang M 2016 Acta Phys. Sin. 65 080303 (in Chinese)[宗晓岚, 杨名2016 65 080303]

    [45]

    Xiao X, Feng M 2011 Phys. Rev. A 83 054301

    [46]

    Jungnitsch B, Moroder T, Guhne O 2011 Phys. Rev. Lett. 106 190502

  • [1] Jiang Shi-Min, Jia Xin-Yan, Fan Dai-He. Quantum non-local correlation testing of Werner state in non-Markovian environment. Acta Physica Sinica, 2024, 73(16): 160301. doi: 10.7498/aps.73.20240450
    [2] Xiong Fan, Chen Yong-Cong, Ao Ping. Qubit dynamics driven by dipole field in thermal noise environment. Acta Physica Sinica, 2023, 72(17): 170302. doi: 10.7498/aps.72.20230625
    [3] Zeng Bai-Yun, Gu Peng-Yu, Jiang Shi-Min, Jia Xin-Yan, Fan Dai-He. Quantum nonlocality testing of the “X” state based on the CHSH inequality in Markov environment. Acta Physica Sinica, 2023, 72(5): 050301. doi: 10.7498/aps.72.20222218
    [4] Zhang Jiao-Yang, Cong Shuang, Wang Chi, Sajede Harraz. Decoherence suppression for N-qubit states via weak measurement and environment-assisted measurement. Acta Physica Sinica, 2022, 71(22): 220303. doi: 10.7498/aps.71.20220760
    [5] Hu Qiang, Zeng Bai-Yun, Gu Peng-Yu, Jia Xin-Yan, Fan Dai-He. Testing quantum nonlocality of two-qubit entangled states under decoherence. Acta Physica Sinica, 2022, 71(7): 070301. doi: 10.7498/aps.71.20211453
    [6] Song Yue, Li Jun-Qi, Liang Jiu-Qing. Dynamics of quantum correlation for three qubits in hierarchical environment. Acta Physica Sinica, 2021, 70(10): 100301. doi: 10.7498/aps.70.20202133
    [7] Zhang Xiao-Dong, Yu Ya-Fei, Zhang Zhi-Ming. Influence of entanglement on precision of parameter estimation in quantum weak measurement. Acta Physica Sinica, 2021, 70(24): 240302. doi: 10.7498/aps.70.20210796
    [8] Wu Ying, Li Jin-Fang, Liu Jin-Ming. Enhancement of quantum Fisher information of quantum teleportation by optimizing partial measurements. Acta Physica Sinica, 2018, 67(14): 140304. doi: 10.7498/aps.67.20180330
    [9] Jia Fang, Liu Cun-Jin, Hu Yin-Quan, Fan Hong-Yi. New formula for calculating the fidelity of teleportation and its applications. Acta Physica Sinica, 2016, 65(22): 220302. doi: 10.7498/aps.65.220302
    [10] Wang Mei-Jiao, Xia Yun-Jie. Protecting quantum entanglement at finite temperature by the weak measurements. Acta Physica Sinica, 2015, 64(24): 240303. doi: 10.7498/aps.64.240303
    [11] Yang Guang, Lian Bao-Wang, Nie Min. Fidelity recovery scheme for quantum teleportation in amplitude damping channel. Acta Physica Sinica, 2015, 64(1): 010303. doi: 10.7498/aps.64.010303
    [12] Qin Meng, Li Yan-Biao, Bai Zhong, Wang Xiao. Effects of different Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interaction and magnetic field on entanglement and fidelity intrinsic decoherence in a spin system. Acta Physica Sinica, 2014, 63(11): 110302. doi: 10.7498/aps.63.110302
    [13] Nie Min, Zhang Lin, Liu Xiao-Hui. Poisson survival model of quantum entanglement signaling network and fidelity analysis. Acta Physica Sinica, 2013, 62(23): 230303. doi: 10.7498/aps.62.230303
    [14] Zhao Jian-Hui. Ground state phase diagram of the quantum spin 1 Blume-Capel model: reduced density fidelity study. Acta Physica Sinica, 2012, 61(22): 220501. doi: 10.7498/aps.61.220501
    [15] Lü Jing-Fen, Ma Shan-Jun. Fidelity of the photon subtracted (or added) squeezed vacuum state and squeezed cat state. Acta Physica Sinica, 2011, 60(8): 080301. doi: 10.7498/aps.60.080301
    [16] Fang Mao-Fa, Peng Xiao-Fang, Liao Xiang-Ping, Pan Chang-Ning, Fang Jian-Shu. Fidelity of quantum teleportation of atomic-state in dissipative environment. Acta Physica Sinica, 2011, 60(9): 090303. doi: 10.7498/aps.60.090303
    [17] Ye Bin, Gu Rui-Jun, Xu Wen-Bo. Robust quantum computation of the kicked Harper model and quantum chaos. Acta Physica Sinica, 2007, 56(7): 3709-3718. doi: 10.7498/aps.56.3709
    [18] Li Yan-Ling, Feng Jian, Meng Xiang-Guo, Liang Bao-Long. Universal quantum teleflipping and telecloning of qubit. Acta Physica Sinica, 2007, 56(10): 5591-5596. doi: 10.7498/aps.56.5591
    [19] Xia Yun-Jie, Wang Guang-Hui, Du Shao-Jiang. Fidelity of the scheme of continunous variables quantum teleportation via minimum-correlation mixed quantum states. Acta Physica Sinica, 2007, 56(8): 4331-4336. doi: 10.7498/aps.56.4331
    [20] Zhang Deng-Yu, Guo Ping, Gao Feng. Fidelity of two-level atoms’ quantum states in a strong thermal radiation field. Acta Physica Sinica, 2007, 56(4): 1906-1910. doi: 10.7498/aps.56.1906
Metrics
  • Abstract views:  7082
  • PDF Downloads:  384
  • Cited By: 0
Publishing process
  • Received Date:  11 August 2016
  • Accepted Date:  14 September 2016
  • Published Online:  05 January 2017

/

返回文章
返回
Baidu
map