-
辐射状磁涡旋因具有拓扑稳定性及纳米级尺寸特性, 被视为磁电子器件中极具潜力的信息载体. 然而, 传统基于磁场或自旋极化电流的辐射状磁涡旋极性翻转方法面临能耗过高的问题. 针对这一挑战, 本文提出了一种基于多铁异质结构的新型无场调控方案, 该结构由双组分纳磁体(Terfenol-D/Ni)、重金属层及压电层复合构成. 其内在对称性破缺特性可有效打破辐射状磁涡旋的圆环对称性, 通过磁电耦合效应实现极性翻转的电压驱动调控. 基于MuMax3的电-力-磁多场耦合仿真表明, 当双组分材料比例$ d _ { \rm T D } : d _ { \rm Ni } = 1:2 $, 界面Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya相互作用(DMI)系数(D)在$ 1 . 2\; {\rm m J / m ^ { 2 } } $—$ 1 . 9\; {\rm m J / m ^{2}} $范围内时, 系统稳定呈现辐射状磁涡旋态; 当$ D={1.7\;\rm m J/m^{2 }} $时, 仅需90 mV电压脉冲即实现对双组分纳磁体辐射状磁涡旋极性翻转, 能耗较传统方法降低6个数量级(达aJ级别). 通过瞬态磁化动态模拟与能量演化分析, 研究揭示了该双组分多铁异质结构中辐射状磁涡旋极性翻转的物理机制: 应变作用下的双材料体系能量竞争驱动磁矩重构, 实现高效、超低能耗的极性翻转. 该方案为磁涡旋存储器的片上集成提供了新路径, 开创了非电流驱动型“电写”磁存储器件设计的新范式, 在低功耗自旋电子学领域具有重要应用价值.Radial magnetic vortices, characterized by their topological stability and nanoscale dimensions, are considered to be highly promising information carriers in magnetic electronic devices. However, traditional methods of reversing the polarity of radial magnetic vortices, which rely on magnetic fields or spin-polarized currents, encounter significant energy consumption problems. To address this challenge, this study proposes a novel field-free control scheme based on multiferroic heterostructures, consisting of a bicomponent nanomagnet (Terfenol-D/Ni), a heavy metal layer, and a piezoelectric layer. The intrinsic symmetry-breaking property of this structure effectively disrupts the circular symmetry of the radial magnetic vortex, which can make voltage-driven polarity reversal through magnetoelectric coupling effects. MuMax3-based multifield coupling simulations of electro-mechanical-magnetic interactions show that when the ratio of the bicomponent materials $ d _ { \rm T D } : d _ { \rm Ni } = 1 : 2 $ and the interfacial Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interaction (DMI) coefficient (D) is in a range of $ 1 . 2\; {\rm m J / m ^ { 2 } } < D < 1 . 9\; {\rm m J / m ^ {2}} $, the system stably presents a radial magnetic vortex state. Within this DMI coefficient range, when the thickness of the bicomponent nanomagnet is less than 4 nm, an appropriate radius can be found to ensure that the ground state of the bicomponent nanomagnet is a radial magnetic vortex state. Particularly, when the thickness t = 1 nm, the radius of the bicomponent nanomagnet can remain in the radial magnetic vortex state in a range of 50 ± 10 nm. In addition, this study also verifies that square and elliptical bicomponent nanomagnets each have a ground state of radial magnetic vortex. When $ D = 1.7\;{\rm m J / m ^ {2}} $, only a 90 mV voltage pulse is required to achieve polarity reversal of the bicomponent nanomagnet, with a total energy consumption per bit Etotal of 5.6 aJ, which is six orders of magnitude lower than that from the traditional methods (reaching the aJ level). Through the simulation of transient magnetization dynamics and the analysis of energy evolution, this study reveals the physical mechanism of polarity reversal of radial magnetic vortices in this bicomponent multiferroic heterostructure: The energy competition in the bimaterial system driven by strain leads to the reconfiguration of magnetic moments, achieving the polarity reversal with efficient and ultra-low energy consumption. This scheme provides a new path for on-chip integration of magnetic vortex memory and opens up a new paradigm for designing non-current-driven “electric write” magnetic storage devices, which has significant application value in the field of low-power spintronics.
-
Keywords:
- radial magnetic vortex /
- strain-driven /
- nanomagnet /
- magnetoelectric coupling
[1] Yamada K, Kasai S, Nakatani Y, Kobayashi K, Kohno H, Thiaville A, Ono T 2007 Nat. Mater. 6 270
Google Scholar
[2] 董丹娜, 蔡理, 李成, 刘保军, 李闯, 刘嘉豪 2018 67 228502
Google Scholar
Dong D N, Cai L, Li C, Liu B J, Li C, Liu J H 2018 Acta Phys. Sin. 67 228502
Google Scholar
[3] Siracusano G, Tomasello R, Giordano A, Puliafito V, Azzerboni B, Ozatay O, Carpentieri M, Finocchio G 2016 Phys. Rev. Lett. 117 087204
Google Scholar
[4] Hrabec A, Porter N, Wells A, Benitez M, Burnell G, McVitie S, McGrouther D, Moore T, Marrows C 2014 Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter 90 020402
Google Scholar
[5] Tomasello R, Carpentieri M, Finocchio G 2014 J. Appl. Phys. 115 17C730
Google Scholar
[6] Verba R, Navas D, Hierro-Rodriguez A, Bunyaev S, Ivanov B, Guslienko K, Kakazei G 2018 Phys. Rev. Appl. 10 031002
Google Scholar
[7] Bhattacharjee P, Mondal S, Saha S, Barman S 2025 J. Phys. Condens. Matter 37 133001
Google Scholar
[8] Karakas V, Gokce A, Habiboglu A T, Arpaci S, Ozbozduman K, Cinar I, Yanik C, Tomasello R, Tacchi S, Siracusano G 2018 Sci. Rep. 8 7180
Google Scholar
[9] Li C, Cai L, Wang S, Yang X, Cui H, Wei B, Dong D, Li C, Liu J, Liu B 2018 IEEE Trans. Magn. 54 3400806
Google Scholar
[10] Wang Y, Wang L, Xia J, et al. 2020 Nat. Commun. 11 3577
Google Scholar
[11] Schoenherr P, Manz S, Kuerten L, Shapovalov K, Iyama A, Kimura T, Fiebig M, Meier D 2020 npj Quantum Materials 5 86
Google Scholar
[12] Geirhos K, Gross B, Szigeti B G, Mehlin A, Philipp S, White J S, Cubitt R, Widmann S, Ghara S, Lunkenheimer P, et al. 2020 npj Quantum Materials 5 44
Google Scholar
[13] Li C, Fang L, Yang X, Xu N, Liu B, Wei B, Zhou E, Yang B 2019 J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 53 015001
Google Scholar
[14] Ma Y, Zhao R, Song C, Jin C, Wang J, Wei Y, Huang Y, Wang J, Wang J, Liu Q 2019 J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 491 165544
Google Scholar
[15] Dong D, Cai L, Li C, Liu B, Li C, Liu J 2019 J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 52 295001
Google Scholar
[16] Fujita R, Gurung G, Mawass M A, et al. 2024 Adv. Funct. Mater. 34 2400552
Google Scholar
[17] Zhu M, Hu H, Cui S, Li Y, Zhou X, Qiu Y, Guo R, Wu G, Yu G, Zhou H 2021 Appl. Phys. Lett. 118 262412
Google Scholar
[18] Hu H, Yu G, Li Y, Qiu Y, Zhu H, Zhu M, Zhou H 2022 Micromachines 13 1056
Google Scholar
[19] Sanchez-Manzano D, Orfila G, Sander A, et al. 2024 ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 16 19681
Google Scholar
[20] Shimon G, Adeyeye A, Ross C 2012 Appl. Phys. Lett. 101 083112
Google Scholar
[21] Xia Y, Yang X, Dou S, Cui H, Wei B, Liang B, Yan X 2024 AIP Adv. 14 045239
Google Scholar
[22] Biswas A K, Bandyopadhyay S, Atulasimha J 2014 Appl. Phys. Lett. 105 072408
Google Scholar
[23] Vansteenkiste A, Leliaert J, Dvornik M, Helsen M, Garcia-Sanchez F, Van Waeyenberge B 2014 AIP Adv. 4 107133
Google Scholar
[24] Landau L, Lifshitz E 1935 Phys. Z. Sowjetunion 8 101
[25] Gilbert T L 1955 Phys. Rev. 100 1243
[26] Zhang S, Wang W, Burn D, Peng H, Berger H, Bauer A, Pfleiderer C, Van Der Laan G, Hesjedal T 2018 Nat. Commun. 9 2115
Google Scholar
[27] Cui H, Cai L, Yang X, Wang S, Zhang M, Li C, Feng C 2018 Appl. Phys. Lett. 11 092404
Google Scholar
[28] Cui J, Hockel J L, Nordeen P K, Pisani D M, Liang C y, Carman G P, Lynch C S 2013 Appl. Phys. Lett. 103 232905
Google Scholar
[29] Cui J, Liang C Y, Paisley E A, Sepulveda A, Ihlefeld J F, Carman G P, Lynch C S 2015 Appl. Phys. Lett. 107 092903
Google Scholar
[30] Bandyopadhyay S 2024 IEEE Trans. Magn. 60 1
[31] Nagaosa N, Tokura Y 2013 Nat. Nanotechnol. 8 899
Google Scholar
[32] Dou S, Yang X, Yuan J, Xia Y, Bai X, Cui H, Wei B 2023 IEEE Magn. Lett. 14 4500305
Google Scholar
-
图 3 不同比例双组分纳磁体的基态
Fig. 3. Ground states of bicomponent nanomagnets with different ratios
图 4 材料比例为$ d _ { \rm T D } : d _ { \rm Ni } = 1 : 2 $, 不同DMI系数下双组分纳磁体的基态
Fig. 4. Ground states of the bicomponent nanomagnets with different DMI factors when the material ratio is $ d _ { \rm T D } : d _ { \rm Ni } = 1 : 2 $
图 5 双组分纳磁体的直径和厚度对辐射状磁涡旋状态的影响
Fig. 5. The influence of the diameter and thickness of bicomponent nanomagnets on the state of radial magnetic vortices
图 7 应力作用10 ns后三种纳磁体的磁化状态
Fig. 7. Magnetization states of three types of nanomagnets after 10 ns of stress action
图 8 应变时钟作用下双组分纳磁体归一化磁化分量$ m _ { z} $和斯格明子数S随时间的变化
Fig. 8. Variation with time of the normalized magnetization component $ m _ {z} $ and the skyrmion number S of a bicomponent nanomagnet under the action of a strain clock
图 9 应变时钟作用下MRV极性翻转过程能量变化和瞬态图
Fig. 9. Energy variation and transient diagram of the polarity inversion process of MRV under the action of strain clock
-
[1] Yamada K, Kasai S, Nakatani Y, Kobayashi K, Kohno H, Thiaville A, Ono T 2007 Nat. Mater. 6 270
Google Scholar
[2] 董丹娜, 蔡理, 李成, 刘保军, 李闯, 刘嘉豪 2018 67 228502
Google Scholar
Dong D N, Cai L, Li C, Liu B J, Li C, Liu J H 2018 Acta Phys. Sin. 67 228502
Google Scholar
[3] Siracusano G, Tomasello R, Giordano A, Puliafito V, Azzerboni B, Ozatay O, Carpentieri M, Finocchio G 2016 Phys. Rev. Lett. 117 087204
Google Scholar
[4] Hrabec A, Porter N, Wells A, Benitez M, Burnell G, McVitie S, McGrouther D, Moore T, Marrows C 2014 Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter 90 020402
Google Scholar
[5] Tomasello R, Carpentieri M, Finocchio G 2014 J. Appl. Phys. 115 17C730
Google Scholar
[6] Verba R, Navas D, Hierro-Rodriguez A, Bunyaev S, Ivanov B, Guslienko K, Kakazei G 2018 Phys. Rev. Appl. 10 031002
Google Scholar
[7] Bhattacharjee P, Mondal S, Saha S, Barman S 2025 J. Phys. Condens. Matter 37 133001
Google Scholar
[8] Karakas V, Gokce A, Habiboglu A T, Arpaci S, Ozbozduman K, Cinar I, Yanik C, Tomasello R, Tacchi S, Siracusano G 2018 Sci. Rep. 8 7180
Google Scholar
[9] Li C, Cai L, Wang S, Yang X, Cui H, Wei B, Dong D, Li C, Liu J, Liu B 2018 IEEE Trans. Magn. 54 3400806
Google Scholar
[10] Wang Y, Wang L, Xia J, et al. 2020 Nat. Commun. 11 3577
Google Scholar
[11] Schoenherr P, Manz S, Kuerten L, Shapovalov K, Iyama A, Kimura T, Fiebig M, Meier D 2020 npj Quantum Materials 5 86
Google Scholar
[12] Geirhos K, Gross B, Szigeti B G, Mehlin A, Philipp S, White J S, Cubitt R, Widmann S, Ghara S, Lunkenheimer P, et al. 2020 npj Quantum Materials 5 44
Google Scholar
[13] Li C, Fang L, Yang X, Xu N, Liu B, Wei B, Zhou E, Yang B 2019 J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 53 015001
Google Scholar
[14] Ma Y, Zhao R, Song C, Jin C, Wang J, Wei Y, Huang Y, Wang J, Wang J, Liu Q 2019 J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 491 165544
Google Scholar
[15] Dong D, Cai L, Li C, Liu B, Li C, Liu J 2019 J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 52 295001
Google Scholar
[16] Fujita R, Gurung G, Mawass M A, et al. 2024 Adv. Funct. Mater. 34 2400552
Google Scholar
[17] Zhu M, Hu H, Cui S, Li Y, Zhou X, Qiu Y, Guo R, Wu G, Yu G, Zhou H 2021 Appl. Phys. Lett. 118 262412
Google Scholar
[18] Hu H, Yu G, Li Y, Qiu Y, Zhu H, Zhu M, Zhou H 2022 Micromachines 13 1056
Google Scholar
[19] Sanchez-Manzano D, Orfila G, Sander A, et al. 2024 ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 16 19681
Google Scholar
[20] Shimon G, Adeyeye A, Ross C 2012 Appl. Phys. Lett. 101 083112
Google Scholar
[21] Xia Y, Yang X, Dou S, Cui H, Wei B, Liang B, Yan X 2024 AIP Adv. 14 045239
Google Scholar
[22] Biswas A K, Bandyopadhyay S, Atulasimha J 2014 Appl. Phys. Lett. 105 072408
Google Scholar
[23] Vansteenkiste A, Leliaert J, Dvornik M, Helsen M, Garcia-Sanchez F, Van Waeyenberge B 2014 AIP Adv. 4 107133
Google Scholar
[24] Landau L, Lifshitz E 1935 Phys. Z. Sowjetunion 8 101
[25] Gilbert T L 1955 Phys. Rev. 100 1243
[26] Zhang S, Wang W, Burn D, Peng H, Berger H, Bauer A, Pfleiderer C, Van Der Laan G, Hesjedal T 2018 Nat. Commun. 9 2115
Google Scholar
[27] Cui H, Cai L, Yang X, Wang S, Zhang M, Li C, Feng C 2018 Appl. Phys. Lett. 11 092404
Google Scholar
[28] Cui J, Hockel J L, Nordeen P K, Pisani D M, Liang C y, Carman G P, Lynch C S 2013 Appl. Phys. Lett. 103 232905
Google Scholar
[29] Cui J, Liang C Y, Paisley E A, Sepulveda A, Ihlefeld J F, Carman G P, Lynch C S 2015 Appl. Phys. Lett. 107 092903
Google Scholar
[30] Bandyopadhyay S 2024 IEEE Trans. Magn. 60 1
[31] Nagaosa N, Tokura Y 2013 Nat. Nanotechnol. 8 899
Google Scholar
[32] Dou S, Yang X, Yuan J, Xia Y, Bai X, Cui H, Wei B 2023 IEEE Magn. Lett. 14 4500305
Google Scholar
下载:
计量
- 文章访问数: 425
- PDF下载量: 3
- 被引次数: 0
