搜索

x

留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

Laves-Co2(Hf Ta)合金的相稳定性及热物性

丁宁 倪晓东 田付阳

引用本文:
Citation:

Laves-Co2(Hf Ta)合金的相稳定性及热物性

丁宁, 倪晓东, 田付阳

Phase stability and thermo-physical properties of Laves-Co2(Hf Ta) alloys

Ding Ning, Ni Xiao-Dong, Tian Fu-Yang
PDF
HTML
导出引用
  • 基于第一性原理计算方法, 在考虑磁效应的基础上, 对不同温度下合金Co2(Hf Ta)中的稳定结构、电子性质和热力学性质展开了研究. 通过第一性原理计算形成能、弹性性质及声子色散关系, 结果表明合金Co2(HfxTa1–x) 在x ≤ 0.75时基态是C36, 当x > 0.75时基态是C14. 这一发现提示了合金成分对其基态结构的影响, 并为合金的稳定性提供了重要线索. 值得注意的是, 考虑了振动熵和电子熵的贡献后, Co2Hf相对稳定的结构变为C36, Co2Ta变为C14, 这表明温度会对合金结构稳定性的影响. Co2(HfxTa1–x)合金在弹性方面呈现出本征脆性. 热力学分析表明其在高温下热容趋于稳定, 德拜温度近似为常数, 振动熵随温度递增且与压强负相关. 电子态密度分析揭示了Co2(Hf Ta)合金三个结构的相稳定性.
    There exists still the controversy over the stable structure of Laves-phase Co2(Hf Ta) alloys with the C14, C15 or C36 structures. In this study, the stability, electronic and thermodynamic properties of Laves-phase Co2(Hf Ta) are investigated. In order to fully understand the influence of magnetic state and temperature on phase stability, we systematically study the free energy change at finite temperature, elastic stability, and phonon dispersion. The low Curie temperature can be estimated, which suggests that the Co2(Hf Ta) alloys possess the paramagnetic state in a wide temperature range. Results indicate that the lattice vibration and electronic excitation have an important effect on the phase stability. The ground state of Co2Hf compound has a C14-type structure, while the ground state of Co2Ta has a C36-type structure, without the effect of temperature. After doping Hf with different concentrations (0.25, 0.50, 0.75) into Co2Ta, the most stable structure still possesses the C36-type structure. After considering the contribution of vibration entropy and electron entropy, the relatively stable structures of Co2Hf and Co2Ta undergo the C36 and C14 phase transition, respectively. In addition, the thermodynamic properties, including Debye temperature, heat capacity, and vibration entropy, which vary with pressure and temperature, are studied. The electronic properties of Co2Hf and Co2Ta compounds are analyzed by the charge difference and density of states. The similar electronic density of states between different phases suggest that the Lave phases have the similar stability. The Hf-Co bonding with a certain direction is revealed. Our results are of great significance in understanding the structure and properties of Co2Hf and Co2Ta compounds.
      Corresponding author: Ni Xiao-Dong, nixd@ustb.edu.cn ; Tian Fu-Yang, fuyang@ustb.edu.cn
    [1]

    Schulze G E 1939 Zeitschrift Für Elektrochemie und Angewandte Physikalische Chemie 45 849Google Scholar

    [2]

    Stein F, Leineweber A 2021 J. Mater. Sci. 56 5321Google Scholar

    [3]

    张硕鑫, 刘士余, 严达利, 余浅, 任海涛, 于彬, 李德军 2021 70 117102Google Scholar

    Zhang S X, Liu S Y, Yan D L, Yu Q, Ren H T, Yu B, Li D J 2021 Acta Phys. Sin. 70 117102Google Scholar

    [4]

    Zhang Y, Fu H, He J, Xie J 2022 J. Alloys Compd. 891 162016Google Scholar

    [5]

    Burzo E, Gratz E, Pop V 1993 J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 123 159Google Scholar

    [6]

    Chen K C, Peterson E J, Thoma D J 2001 Intermetallics 9 771Google Scholar

    [7]

    Chen K C, Chu F, Kotula P G, Thoma D 2001 Intermetallics 9 785Google Scholar

    [8]

    Concas G, Congiu F, Belošević-Čavor J, Cekić B 2007 Zeitschrift für Naturforschung A 62 452Google Scholar

    [9]

    Wang C, Chen X, Yang P, Zhang Q, Yang S, Lu Y, Guo Y, Liu X 2022 J. Alloys Compd. 925 166723Google Scholar

    [10]

    Ooshima M, Tanaka K, Okamoto N L, Kishida K, Inui H 2010 J. Alloys Compd. 508 71Google Scholar

    [11]

    Omori T, Oikawa K, Sato J, Ohnuma I, Kattner U R, Kainuma R, Ishida K 2013 Intermetallics 32 274Google Scholar

    [12]

    Povstugar I, Choi P P, Neumeier S, Bauer A, Zenk C H, Göken M, Raabe D 2014 Acta Mater. 78 78Google Scholar

    [13]

    Dragsdorf R, Foreing W 1962 Acta Crystallogr. 15 531Google Scholar

    [14]

    Baheti V A, Roy S, Ravi R, Paul A 2013 Intermetallics 33 87Google Scholar

    [15]

    Shinagawa K, Chinen H, Omori T, Oikawa K, Ohnuma I, Ishida K, Kainuma R 2014 Intermetallics 49 87Google Scholar

    [16]

    Wang P, Koßmann J, Kattner U R, Palumbo M, Hammerschmidt T, Olson G B 2019 Calphad 64 205Google Scholar

    [17]

    Zhou C, Guo C, Li C, Du Z 2019 Calphad 66 101649Google Scholar

    [18]

    Asano S, Ishida S 1988 J. Phys. F: Metal Phys. 18 501Google Scholar

    [19]

    Stein F, Palm M, Sauthoff G 2004 Intermetallics 12 713Google Scholar

    [20]

    Von Keitz A, Sauthoff G 2002 Intermetallics 10 497Google Scholar

    [21]

    Thoma D, Perepezko J 1995 J. Alloys Compd. 224 330Google Scholar

    [22]

    Wang L, Kong Y, Oehring M, Song M, Pyczak F 2022 J. Alloys Compd. 906 164261Google Scholar

    [23]

    Levy O, Hart G L, Curtarolo S 2010 Acta Mater. 58 2887Google Scholar

    [24]

    Segall M, Lindan P J, Probert M A, Pickard C J, Hasnip P J, Clark S, Payne M 2002 J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 14 2717Google Scholar

    [25]

    Clark S J, Segall M D, Pickard C J, Hasnip P J, Probert M I, Refson K, Payne M C 2005 Z. Krist. -Cryst. Mater. 220 567Google Scholar

    [26]

    Perdew J P, Ruzsinszky A, Csonka G I, Vydrov O A, Scuseria G E, Constantin L A, Zhou X, Burke K 2008 Phys. Rev. Lett. 100 136406Google Scholar

    [27]

    Monkhorst H J, Pack J D 1976 Phys. Rev. B 13 5188Google Scholar

    [28]

    Pfrommer B G, Côté M, Louie S G, Cohen M L 1997 J. Comput. Phys. 131 233Google Scholar

    [29]

    Wang Q, Li Q, Ding H, Tian F 2022 Comput. Condens. Matter 32 e00721Google Scholar

    [30]

    Sun Y, Zhou Y, Gurunathan R, Zhang J Y, Hu M, Liu W, Xu B, Snyder G J 2021 J. Mater. Chem. C 9 8506Google Scholar

    [31]

    Wu R, Wang Y P, Shao L, Wang W, Tang B Y 2021 Chin. J. Chem. Eng. 40 315Google Scholar

    [32]

    Gao J, Liu Q, Jiang C, Fan D, Zhang M, Liu F, Tang B 2022 Chin. J. High Press. Phys 36 051101Google Scholar

    [33]

    Jana A, Sridar S, Fries S G, Hammerschmidt T, Kumar K H 2020 Intermetallics 116 106640Google Scholar

    [34]

    Chen S, Sun Y, Duan Y H, Huang B, Peng M J 2015 J. Alloys Compd. 630 202Google Scholar

    [35]

    Özer T 2020 Canadian J. Phys. 98 357Google Scholar

    [36]

    Cheng T M, Yu G L, Zhang X X 2022 Physica B 645 414268Google Scholar

    [37]

    Xu Y, Cao Y, Hu C, Zhang C, Tian C, Alzoabi S, Santos N, Zhou S 2021 Solid State Sci. 115 106580Google Scholar

    [38]

    Xu N, Chen Y, Chen S, Zhang W, Li S, Song R, Zhang J 2023 J. Mater. Res. Technol. 26 4825Google Scholar

    [39]

    Jian Y, Huang Z, Xing J, Sun L, Liu Y, Gao P 2019 Mater. Chem. Phys. 221 311Google Scholar

    [40]

    Ranganathan S I, Ostoja-Starzewski M 2008 Phys. Rev. Lett. 101 055504Google Scholar

    [41]

    Hong D, Zeng W, Liu F S, Tang B, Liu Q J 2019 Physica B 558 100Google Scholar

  • 图 1  Laves相三种类型结构示意图 (a) C14结构; (b) C15结构; (c) C36结构

    Fig. 1.  Schematic diagrams of three types of Laves phase: (a) C14 structure; (b) C15 structure; (c) C36 structure.

    图 2  在0 GPa下Co2Hf (a) 和Co2Ta (b) Laves相的FM态和PM态的声子色散曲线

    Fig. 2.  Phonon dispersion of Co2Hf (a) and Co2Ta (b) Laves phases with FM and PM at 0 GPa.

    图 3  Co2(HfxTa1–x)合金的晶格参数(a)和形成能(b)随Hf含量x的变化

    Fig. 3.  Lattice parameters (a) and formation energy (b) of Co2(HfxTa1–x) alloys versus the Hf composition.

    图 4  Co2Hf (a)和 Co2Ta (b)的弹性模量、泊松比($ \nu $)及B/G参数

    Fig. 4.  Elastic modulus, Poisson's ratio ($ \nu $) and B/G for Co2Hf (a) and Co2Ta (b).

    图 5  Co2(Hf Ta)合金的弹性模量、泊松比($ \nu $)和及B/G参数

    Fig. 5.  Elastic modulus, Poisson’s ratio ($ \nu $) and B/G values of Co2(Hf Ta) alloys.

    图 6  Co2Hf (a)和Co2Ta (b) 的弹性模量和各向异性因子AU, ABAG

    Fig. 6.  Elastic moduli and anisotropy factors AU, AB and AG of Co2Hf (a) and Co2Ta (b).

    图 7  Co2Ta1–xHfx稳定结构的杨氏模量 (E)的三维图(颜色刻度值以GPa为单位) (a) 铁磁态C14相Co2Hf; (b) 顺磁态C15相Co2Hf; (c) 铁磁态C36相 Co2Ta; (d)—(f) 铁磁C36相 Co2Hf0.25Ta0.75, Co2Hf0.5Ta0.5, Co2Hf0.75Ta0.25

    Fig. 7.  Anisotropy of Young’s modulus (E) of Co2Ta1–xHfx along different crystalline directions: (a) Ferromagnetic C14 Co2Hf; (b) paramagnetic C15 Co2Hf; (c) ferromagnetic C36 Co2Ta; (d)–(f) ferromagnetic C36 Co2Hf0.25Ta0.75, Co2Hf0.5Ta0.5 and Co2Hf0.75Ta0.25. The color scale is in GPa.

    图 8  不同压强下热容随温度的变化 (a) C14-PM Co2Hf; (b) C36-PM Co2Ta; (c) C36- PM Co2Hf0.25Ta0.75; (d) C36-PM Co2Hf0.5Ta0.5; (e) C36-PM Co2Hf0.75Ta0.25

    Fig. 8.  Heat capacity with temperature under different pressures: (a) C14-PM Co2Hf; (b) C36-PM Co2Ta; (c) C36-PM Co2Hf0.25Ta0.75; (d) C36-PM Co2Hf0.5Ta0.5; (e) C36-PM Co2Hf0.75Ta0.25.

    图 9  德拜温度与温度和压强的关系 (a) C15 Co2Hf; (b) C36 Co2Ta; (c) C36 Co2Hf0.25Ta0.75; (d) C36 Co2Hf0.5Ta0.5; (e) C36 Co2Hf0.75Ta0.25

    Fig. 9.  Debye temperature versus temperature at finite pressure: (a) C15 Co2Hf; (b) C36 Co2Ta; (c) C36 Co2Hf0.25Ta0.75; (d) C36 Co2Hf0.5Ta0.5; (e) C36 Co2Hf0.75Ta0.25.

    图 10  不同压强下, 振动熵与温度的变化关系, 其中(a) C15 Co2Hf; (b) C36 Co2Ta; (c)—(e) C36 Co2Hf0.25Ta0.75, Co2Hf0.5Ta0.5, Co2Hf0.75Ta0.25; (f) Co2Hf和Co2Ta 的自由能随温度的变化

    Fig. 10.  Vibrational entropy versus temperature under different pressures: (a) C15 Co2Hf; (b) C36 Co2Ta; (c)–(e) C36 Co2Hf0.25Ta0.75, Co2Hf0.5Ta0.5, Co2Hf0.75Ta0.25. (f) The free energy versus temperature for Co2Hf and Co2Ta.

    图 11  Co2Hf和Co2Ta总态密度和分态密度(垂直虚线表示费米能级) (a), (b) C14, C15, C36相的Co2Hf和 Co2Ta的总电子态密度; (c), (e) C14相 Co2Hf的分态密度; (d), (f) C36相Co2Ta的分态密度

    Fig. 11.  Total density of states and partial density of states of Co2Hf and Co2Ta : (a), (b) The total electronic density of states of Co2Hf and Co2Ta in C14, C15 and C36 phases; (c), (e) the partial density of states of C14 phase Co2Hf; (d), (f) the partial density of states of C36 phase Co2Ta. The vertical dotted line represents the Fermi level.

    图 12  差分电荷密度图 (a) Co2Hf 的C14结构$ (11 \bar{2} 0)$面; (b) Co2Hf 的C15结构的(110)面; (c), (d) 代表为铁磁和顺磁Co2Ta的C36 的$(11 \bar{2}0) $面

    Fig. 12.  Differential charge density diagram: (a) C14-FM $ (11\bar{2}0) $ plane of C14 structure of Co2Hf; (b) C15-FM (110) plane of C15 structure of Co2Hf; (c), (d) the $ (11\bar{2} 0)$ plane of C36 with ferromagnetic and paramagnetic Co2Ta.

    表 1  Laves相晶体结构的基本信息; 表中x = 1/6, z (C14-A1) = 9/16, z (C36-A1) = 21/32, z (C36-A2) = 3/32, z (C36-B3) = 1/8理想原子位置附近, 随A和B的不同, 6h和4e, 4f位的位置参数xz会有微小的变化[2]

    Table 1.  Details on Laves phase crystal structure. Depending on A and B sites, the position parameters x and z of the 6h and 4e, 4f sites slightly vary around the ideal atom position values of x = 1/6, z (C14-A1) = 9/16, z (C36-A1) = 21/32, z (C36-A2) = 3/32, z (C36-B3) = 1/8[2].

    结构名称 结构类型 空间群 原子 亚格点位置以及占位
    x y z
    C15 MgCu2 227 A 8a 0 0 0
    B 16d 5/8 5/8 5/8
    C14 MgZn2 194 A 4f 1/3 2/3 z
    B1 6h x 2x 1/4
    B2 2a 0 0 0
    C36 MgNi2 194 A1 4f 1/3 2/3 z
    A2 4e 0 0 z
    B1 6h
    x
    2x 1/4
    B2 6g 1/2 0 0
    B3 4f 1/3 2/3 z
    下载: 导出CSV

    表 2  Co2Hf和Co2Ta Laves相的晶格常数ac、体积V、钴的局域磁矩M、形成能ΔH、有无自旋极化状态下的能量差ΔE, 及可利用的实验或模拟数据

    Table 2.  Lattice constants a, c, volume V, local magnetic moment M, formation energy ΔH, energy difference ΔE with and without spin polarization state , and available experimental or simulated data of Co2Hf and Co2Ta Laves phases.

    体系 结构 a c V/(Å3·atom–1) M/(μB·atom–1) ΔH/(eV·atom–1) ΔE/(eV·atom–1) Refs.
    Co2Hf C14 4.873 7.939 13.605 0.69
    0.79
    –0.3788 –0.017
    C15 4.870 13.615 0.76 –0.3752 –0.002
    4.824
    4.909

    13.945
    Cal.[22]
    Cal.[34]
    C36 4.876 15.837 13.585 0.68
    0.70
    0.58
    –0.3779 –0.007
    4.816 15.650 Cal.[22]
    Co2Ta C14 4.766 7.750 12.703 0.33
    0.68
    –0.2378 –0.002
    4.797 7.827 12.730 Exp.[13]
    C15 4.759 12.702 0.40 –0.2442 –0.005
    4.791 12.957 Cal.[34]
    C36 4.760 15.529 12.698 0.39
    0.41
    0.27
    –0.2447 –0.003
    下载: 导出CSV

    表 3  Co2Hf和Co2Ta的C14, C15和C36结构以及Co2(Ta1–xHfx)基态结构的弹性常数cij (GPa), 其中, 结构部分, FM和PM代表铁磁和顺磁态, 数字156, 186表示空间群

    Table 3.  Elastic constants cij (GPa) of C14, C15, C36Co2Hf and Co2Ta as well as Co2(Ta1–xHfx), where the structural part, FM and PM represent ferromagnetic and paramagnetic states, and the numbers 156, 186 represent the space group.

    体系 结构 c11 c33 c44 c12 c13 $c_{66}, {c_{14}}^* $ Refs.
    Co2Hf C14-FM 274.14 332.76 81.86 86.14 126.48 94.00
    C14-PM 299.75 348.07 73.80 90.11 113.04 104.82
    C15-FM 308.80 85.60 154.53
    C15-PM 298.50 106.00 139.12
    C15 270.20 85.50 117.50 Cal.[34]
    C36-FM 308.11 293.50 80.53 121.99 113.90 93.06
    C36-PM 329.08 343.58 81.90 120.83 117.89 104.12
    Co2Ta C14-FM 407.15 430.80 97.10 138.20 151.11 134.48
    C14-PM 442.04 421.53 89.27 167.32 137.34 137.36
    C15-FM 357.11 141.47 137.90
    C15-PM 395.37 151.94 165.32
    C15 383.50 143.90 173.40 Cal.[34]
    C36-FM 424.64 429.32 98.18 154.27 143.77 135.19
    C36-PM 444.08 481.10 88.70 174.90 177.34 134.59
    Co2Hf0.25Ta0.75 156-FM 390.67 383.02 80.43 153.72 146.41 –1.13
    Co2Hf0.5Ta0.5 186-FM 358.36 362.80 84.35 132.40 126.78
    Co2Hf0.75Ta0.25 156-FM 327.16 312.04 77.66 130.90 122.88 0.68
    *: c66, c14数据列, 其中后3行时c14数值, 其他行为c66数值.
    下载: 导出CSV
    Baidu
  • [1]

    Schulze G E 1939 Zeitschrift Für Elektrochemie und Angewandte Physikalische Chemie 45 849Google Scholar

    [2]

    Stein F, Leineweber A 2021 J. Mater. Sci. 56 5321Google Scholar

    [3]

    张硕鑫, 刘士余, 严达利, 余浅, 任海涛, 于彬, 李德军 2021 70 117102Google Scholar

    Zhang S X, Liu S Y, Yan D L, Yu Q, Ren H T, Yu B, Li D J 2021 Acta Phys. Sin. 70 117102Google Scholar

    [4]

    Zhang Y, Fu H, He J, Xie J 2022 J. Alloys Compd. 891 162016Google Scholar

    [5]

    Burzo E, Gratz E, Pop V 1993 J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 123 159Google Scholar

    [6]

    Chen K C, Peterson E J, Thoma D J 2001 Intermetallics 9 771Google Scholar

    [7]

    Chen K C, Chu F, Kotula P G, Thoma D 2001 Intermetallics 9 785Google Scholar

    [8]

    Concas G, Congiu F, Belošević-Čavor J, Cekić B 2007 Zeitschrift für Naturforschung A 62 452Google Scholar

    [9]

    Wang C, Chen X, Yang P, Zhang Q, Yang S, Lu Y, Guo Y, Liu X 2022 J. Alloys Compd. 925 166723Google Scholar

    [10]

    Ooshima M, Tanaka K, Okamoto N L, Kishida K, Inui H 2010 J. Alloys Compd. 508 71Google Scholar

    [11]

    Omori T, Oikawa K, Sato J, Ohnuma I, Kattner U R, Kainuma R, Ishida K 2013 Intermetallics 32 274Google Scholar

    [12]

    Povstugar I, Choi P P, Neumeier S, Bauer A, Zenk C H, Göken M, Raabe D 2014 Acta Mater. 78 78Google Scholar

    [13]

    Dragsdorf R, Foreing W 1962 Acta Crystallogr. 15 531Google Scholar

    [14]

    Baheti V A, Roy S, Ravi R, Paul A 2013 Intermetallics 33 87Google Scholar

    [15]

    Shinagawa K, Chinen H, Omori T, Oikawa K, Ohnuma I, Ishida K, Kainuma R 2014 Intermetallics 49 87Google Scholar

    [16]

    Wang P, Koßmann J, Kattner U R, Palumbo M, Hammerschmidt T, Olson G B 2019 Calphad 64 205Google Scholar

    [17]

    Zhou C, Guo C, Li C, Du Z 2019 Calphad 66 101649Google Scholar

    [18]

    Asano S, Ishida S 1988 J. Phys. F: Metal Phys. 18 501Google Scholar

    [19]

    Stein F, Palm M, Sauthoff G 2004 Intermetallics 12 713Google Scholar

    [20]

    Von Keitz A, Sauthoff G 2002 Intermetallics 10 497Google Scholar

    [21]

    Thoma D, Perepezko J 1995 J. Alloys Compd. 224 330Google Scholar

    [22]

    Wang L, Kong Y, Oehring M, Song M, Pyczak F 2022 J. Alloys Compd. 906 164261Google Scholar

    [23]

    Levy O, Hart G L, Curtarolo S 2010 Acta Mater. 58 2887Google Scholar

    [24]

    Segall M, Lindan P J, Probert M A, Pickard C J, Hasnip P J, Clark S, Payne M 2002 J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 14 2717Google Scholar

    [25]

    Clark S J, Segall M D, Pickard C J, Hasnip P J, Probert M I, Refson K, Payne M C 2005 Z. Krist. -Cryst. Mater. 220 567Google Scholar

    [26]

    Perdew J P, Ruzsinszky A, Csonka G I, Vydrov O A, Scuseria G E, Constantin L A, Zhou X, Burke K 2008 Phys. Rev. Lett. 100 136406Google Scholar

    [27]

    Monkhorst H J, Pack J D 1976 Phys. Rev. B 13 5188Google Scholar

    [28]

    Pfrommer B G, Côté M, Louie S G, Cohen M L 1997 J. Comput. Phys. 131 233Google Scholar

    [29]

    Wang Q, Li Q, Ding H, Tian F 2022 Comput. Condens. Matter 32 e00721Google Scholar

    [30]

    Sun Y, Zhou Y, Gurunathan R, Zhang J Y, Hu M, Liu W, Xu B, Snyder G J 2021 J. Mater. Chem. C 9 8506Google Scholar

    [31]

    Wu R, Wang Y P, Shao L, Wang W, Tang B Y 2021 Chin. J. Chem. Eng. 40 315Google Scholar

    [32]

    Gao J, Liu Q, Jiang C, Fan D, Zhang M, Liu F, Tang B 2022 Chin. J. High Press. Phys 36 051101Google Scholar

    [33]

    Jana A, Sridar S, Fries S G, Hammerschmidt T, Kumar K H 2020 Intermetallics 116 106640Google Scholar

    [34]

    Chen S, Sun Y, Duan Y H, Huang B, Peng M J 2015 J. Alloys Compd. 630 202Google Scholar

    [35]

    Özer T 2020 Canadian J. Phys. 98 357Google Scholar

    [36]

    Cheng T M, Yu G L, Zhang X X 2022 Physica B 645 414268Google Scholar

    [37]

    Xu Y, Cao Y, Hu C, Zhang C, Tian C, Alzoabi S, Santos N, Zhou S 2021 Solid State Sci. 115 106580Google Scholar

    [38]

    Xu N, Chen Y, Chen S, Zhang W, Li S, Song R, Zhang J 2023 J. Mater. Res. Technol. 26 4825Google Scholar

    [39]

    Jian Y, Huang Z, Xing J, Sun L, Liu Y, Gao P 2019 Mater. Chem. Phys. 221 311Google Scholar

    [40]

    Ranganathan S I, Ostoja-Starzewski M 2008 Phys. Rev. Lett. 101 055504Google Scholar

    [41]

    Hong D, Zeng W, Liu F S, Tang B, Liu Q J 2019 Physica B 558 100Google Scholar

  • [1] 周金萍, 李春梅, 姜博, 黄仁忠. Co和Ni过量影响Co2NiGa合金晶体结构及相稳定性的第一性原理研究.  , 2023, 72(15): 156301. doi: 10.7498/aps.72.20230626
    [2] 杨顺杰, 李春梅, 周金萍. 磁无序及合金化效应影响Co2CrZ (Z = Ga, Si, Ge)合金相稳定性和弹性常数的第一性原理研究.  , 2022, 71(10): 106201. doi: 10.7498/aps.71.20212254
    [3] 陈光平, 杨金妮, 乔昌兵, 黄陆君, 虞静. Er3+掺杂TiO2的局域结构及电子性质的第一性原理研究.  , 2022, 71(24): 246102. doi: 10.7498/aps.71.20221847
    [4] 王艳, 陈南迪, 杨陈, 曾召益, 胡翠娥, 陈向荣. 二维材料XTe2 (X = Pd, Pt)热电性能的第一性原理计算.  , 2021, 70(11): 116301. doi: 10.7498/aps.70.20201939
    [5] 胡前库, 秦双红, 吴庆华, 李丹丹, 张斌, 袁文凤, 王李波, 周爱国. 三元Nb系和Ta系硼碳化物稳定性和物理性能的第一性原理研究.  , 2020, 69(11): 116201. doi: 10.7498/aps.69.20200234
    [6] 黄炳铨, 周铁戈, 吴道雄, 张召富, 李百奎. 空位及氮掺杂二维ZnO单层材料性质:第一性原理计算与分子轨道分析.  , 2019, 68(24): 246301. doi: 10.7498/aps.68.20191258
    [7] 胡前库, 侯一鸣, 吴庆华, 秦双红, 王李波, 周爱国. 过渡金属硼碳化物TM3B3C和TM4B3C2稳定性和性能的理论计算.  , 2019, 68(9): 096201. doi: 10.7498/aps.68.20190158
    [8] 白静, 王晓书, 俎启睿, 赵骧, 左良. Ni-X-In(X=Mn,Fe和Co)合金的缺陷稳定性和磁性能的第一性原理研究.  , 2016, 65(9): 096103. doi: 10.7498/aps.65.096103
    [9] 彭琼, 何朝宇, 李金, 钟建新. MoSi2薄膜电子性质的第一性原理研究.  , 2015, 64(4): 047102. doi: 10.7498/aps.64.047102
    [10] 焦照勇, 郭永亮, 牛毅君, 张现周. 缺陷黄铜矿结构Xga2S4 (X=Zn, Cd, Hg)晶体电子结构和光学性质的第一性原理研究.  , 2013, 62(7): 073101. doi: 10.7498/aps.62.073101
    [11] 邓娇娇, 刘波, 顾牡, 刘小林, 黄世明, 倪晨. 伽马CuX(X=Cl,Br,I)的电子结构和光学性质的第一性原理计算.  , 2012, 61(3): 036105. doi: 10.7498/aps.61.036105
    [12] 李雪梅, 韩会磊, 何光普. LiNH2 的晶格动力学、介电性质和热力学性质第一性原理研究.  , 2011, 60(8): 087104. doi: 10.7498/aps.60.087104
    [13] 谭兴毅, 金克新, 陈长乐, 周超超. YFe2B2电子结构的第一性原理计算.  , 2010, 59(5): 3414-3417. doi: 10.7498/aps.59.3414
    [14] 丁航晨, 施思齐, 姜平, 唐为华. BiFeO3 结构性质与相转变的第一性原理研究.  , 2010, 59(12): 8789-8793. doi: 10.7498/aps.59.8789
    [15] 李沛娟, 周薇薇, 唐元昊, 张华, 施思齐. CeO2的电子结构,光学和晶格动力学性质:第一性原理研究.  , 2010, 59(5): 3426-3431. doi: 10.7498/aps.59.3426
    [16] 汪志刚, 张杨, 文玉华, 朱梓忠. ZnO原子链的结构稳定性和电子性质的第一性原理研究.  , 2010, 59(3): 2051-2056. doi: 10.7498/aps.59.2051
    [17] 张学军, 高攀, 柳清菊. 氮铁共掺锐钛矿相TiO2电子结构和光学性质的第一性原理研究.  , 2010, 59(7): 4930-4938. doi: 10.7498/aps.59.4930
    [18] 吴红丽, 赵新青, 宫声凯. Nb掺杂对TiO2/NiTi界面电子结构影响的第一性原理计算.  , 2008, 57(12): 7794-7799. doi: 10.7498/aps.57.7794
    [19] 孙 博, 刘绍军, 段素青, 祝文军. Fe的结构与物性及其压力效应的第一性原理计算.  , 2007, 56(3): 1598-1602. doi: 10.7498/aps.56.1598
    [20] 宋庆功, 姜恩永, 裴海林, 康建海, 郭 英. 插层化合物LixTiS2中Li离子-空位二维有序结构稳定性的第一性原理研究.  , 2007, 56(8): 4817-4822. doi: 10.7498/aps.56.4817
计量
  • 文章访问数:  1701
  • PDF下载量:  56
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2024-01-20
  • 修回日期:  2024-03-10
  • 上网日期:  2024-04-28
  • 刊出日期:  2024-06-20

/

返回文章
返回
Baidu
map