Search

Article

x

留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

Discharge characteristics of a microsecond pulsed underwater streamer discharge in multi-needle electrode configuration

Yang Shuang-Yue Wen Xiao-Qiong Yang Yuan-Tian Li Xiao

Citation:

Discharge characteristics of a microsecond pulsed underwater streamer discharge in multi-needle electrode configuration

Yang Shuang-Yue, Wen Xiao-Qiong, Yang Yuan-Tian, Li Xiao
PDF
HTML
Get Citation
  • The underwater streamer discharge has received extensive attention in the field of environmental protection, because it can generate free radicals and reactive oxygen species directly in water. The multi-needle electrode is a basic electrode configuration for achieving large-volume underwater streamer discharge. Understanding the discharge characteristics of the multi-needle electrode configuration is important for designing the large-volume discharge reactors. In this work, a multi-needle electrode that can assemble 21 needles is employed. The number of anode needles generating a streamer discharge during a single pulsed discharge and the differences in morphological characteristics between the inside and the edge of the electrode array are investigated by using an ultra-high-speed camera system. The electric field distribution of the multi-needle electrode is simulated by using the COMSOL software, and the effect of the electric field distribution on the discharge of multi-needle electrode is also studied. The discharge energy efficiency of the multi-needle electrode configuration is evaluated. It is found that the 21 needles are not discharged simultaneously during a discharge pulse. The number of discharged anode needles gradually increases and then reaches a maximum value (≤21). The maximum number of discharged anode needles during a single discharge pulse increases as the voltage and needle spacing increases. During a single discharge pulse, the filament generated from the needles at the edge of the electrode array grows longer and deviates more largely from the needle axis than that generated from the needles inside the electrode array. Such characteristics are primarily due to the disturbance of the electric field among the 21 needles. As the needle spacing decreases, the disturbance of the electric field among the 21 needles gets stronger, consequently, the discharge morphology differences between the needles at the edge and needles at the inner of the needle array become more significant, and the energy efficiency of the discharge drops remarkably.
      Corresponding author: Wen Xiao-Qiong, wenxq@dlut.edu.cn
    • Funds: Project supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 11635004, 12375248).
    [1]

    Cao Y, Qu G Z, Li T F, Jiang N, Wang T C 2018 Plasma Sci. Technol. 20 103001Google Scholar

    [2]

    Lee H D, Kim J O, Chung J W 2015 Desalin. Water Treat. 53 2767Google Scholar

    [3]

    Wang T C, Qu G Z, Pei S Z, Liang D L, Hu S B 2016 Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 23 13448Google Scholar

    [4]

    Wen X Q, Wang M, Liu X H 2012 IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci. 40 1089Google Scholar

    [5]

    Kim S D, Jang D I, Lim B J, Lee S B, Mok Y S 2013 Plasma Sci. Technol. 15 659Google Scholar

    [6]

    Hijosa-Valsero M, Molina R, Montràs A, Müller M, Bayona J M 2014 Environ. Technol. Rev. 3 71Google Scholar

    [7]

    Schneider M, Rataj R, Kolb J F, Bláha L 2020 Environ. Pollut. 266 115423Google Scholar

    [8]

    Sakugawa T, Aoki N, Akiyama H, Ishibashi K, Watanabe M, Kouda A, Suematsu K 2014 IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci. 42 794Google Scholar

    [9]

    Schoenbach K H, Joshi R P, Stark R H, Dobbs F C, Beebe S J 2000 IEEE Trans. Dielectr. Electr. Insul. 7 637Google Scholar

    [10]

    Foster J E 2017 Phys. Plasmas 24 055501Google Scholar

    [11]

    Banaschik R, Burchhardt G, Zocher K, Hammerschmidt S, Kolb J F, Weltmann K D 2016 Bioelectrochemistry 112 83Google Scholar

    [12]

    An W, Baumung K, Bluhm H 2007 J. Appl. Phys. 101 053302Google Scholar

    [13]

    Locke B R, Thagard S M 2012 Plasma Chem. Plasma P. 32 875Google Scholar

    [14]

    Lesaint O 2016 J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 49 144001Google Scholar

    [15]

    Ceccato P, Guaitella O, Shaper L, Graham B, Rousseau A 2009 IEEE Pulsed Power Conference Washington D. C. , USA, June 28–July 2, 2009 p866

    [16]

    Fujita H, Kanazawa S, Ohtani K, Komiya A, Kaneko T, Sato T 2014 J. Appl. Phys. 116 213301Google Scholar

    [17]

    Fujita H, Kanazawa S, Ohtani K, Komiya A, Sato T 2013 J. Appl. Phys. 113 113304Google Scholar

    [18]

    Katsuki S, Tanaka K, Fudamoto T, Namihira T, Akiyama H, Bluhm H 2006 Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 45 239Google Scholar

    [19]

    Marinov I, Starikovskaia S, Rousseau A 2014 J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 47 224017Google Scholar

    [20]

    Katsuki S, Akiyama H, Abou-Ghazala A, Schoenbach K H 2002 IEEE Trans. Dielectr. Electr. Insul. 9 498Google Scholar

    [21]

    Wen X Q, Liu G S, Ding Z F 2012 IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci. 40 438Google Scholar

    [22]

    Wen X Q, Liu G S, Ding Z F 2011 IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci. 39 1758Google Scholar

    [23]

    Kolb J F, Joshi R P, Xiao S, Schoenbach K H 2008 J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 41 234007Google Scholar

    [24]

    Vanraes P, Bogaerts A 2018 Appl. Phys. Rev. 5 031103Google Scholar

    [25]

    Sharbaugh A H, Devins J C, Rzad S J 1978 IEEE Trans. Electr. Insul. EI-13 249Google Scholar

    [26]

    Jones H M, Kunhardt E E 1994 IEEE Trans. Dielectr. Electr. Insul. 1 1016Google Scholar

    [27]

    Kunhardt E E 1991 Phys. Rev. B 44 4235Google Scholar

    [28]

    Joshi R P, Qian J, Zhao G, Kolb J, Schoenbach K H, Schamiloglu E, Gaudet J 2004 J. Appl. Phys. 96 5129Google Scholar

    [29]

    Shneider M N, Pekker M, Fridman A 2012 IEEE Trans. Dielectr. Electr. Insul. 19 1579Google Scholar

    [30]

    Starikovskiy A, Yang Y, Cho Y I, Fridman A 2011 Plasma Sources Sci. Technol. 20 024003Google Scholar

    [31]

    Marinov I, Guaitella O, Rousseau A, Starikovskaia S M 2013 Plasma Sources Sci. Technol. 22 042001Google Scholar

    [32]

    Banaschik R, Lukes P, Jablonowski H, Hammer M U, Weltmann K D, Kolb J F 2015 Water Res. 84 127Google Scholar

    [33]

    Luke P, Clupek M, Sunka P, Babick V, Janda V 2002 Czech. J. Phys. 52 800

    [34]

    Malik M A, Minamitani Y, Xiao S, Kolb J F, Schoenbach K H 2005 IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci. 33 490Google Scholar

    [35]

    Wen X Q, Liu G S, Ding Z F 2010 IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci. 38 3330Google Scholar

    [36]

    Sugiarto A T, Sato M, Ohshima T, Skalny J D 2002 J. Adv. Oxid. Technol. 5 211Google Scholar

    [37]

    Sugiarto A T, Ohshima T, Sato M 2002 Thin Solid Films 407 174Google Scholar

    [38]

    Lisitsyn I V, Nomiyama H, Katsuki S, Akiyama H 1999 Rev. Sci. Instrum. 70 3457Google Scholar

    [39]

    Wang H J, Li J, Quan X 2006 J. Electrostat. 64 416Google Scholar

    [40]

    Lukes P, Clupek M, Babicky V, Sunka P 2008 IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci. 36 1146Google Scholar

    [41]

    Šunka P 2001 Phys. Plasmas 8 2587Google Scholar

    [42]

    Zhu T Y, Zhang Q G, Shi X Y, Li Z, Yang L J 2008 IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci. 36 237Google Scholar

    [43]

    Zhu T Y, Yang L J, Jia Z J, Zhang Q G 2008 J. Appl. Phys. 104 113302Google Scholar

    [44]

    Hartmann W, Roemheld M, Rohde K D, Spiess F J 2009 IEEE Trans. Dielectr. Electr. Insul. 16 1061Google Scholar

    [45]

    Wang H J, Li J, Quan X, Wu Y 2008 Appl. Catal. B Environ. 83 72Google Scholar

    [46]

    郭沛 2023 学士学位论文 (大连: 大连理工大学)

    Guo P 2023 B. S. Thesis (Dalian: Dalian University of Technology

    [47]

    佟云颢 2021 学士学位论文 (大连: 大连理工大学)

    Tong Y H 2021 B. S. Thesis (Dalian: Dalian University of Technology

    [48]

    Wang L R, Wen X Q, Yang Y T, Wang X 2023 J. Appl. Phys. 134 013302Google Scholar

  • 图 1  (a) 多针电极结构示意图; (b) 实验装置图

    Figure 1.  (a) Schematic of the multi-needle electrode structure; (b) experimental setup.

    图 2  (a)放电电压、电流波形及相机门信号示例; (b)相机时间设定示例

    Figure 2.  (a) An example of the waveform of the discharge voltage and current, and the camera gating signal; (b) example of camera time settings.

    图 3  多针电极放电时间演化图像(15 mm, 60 µS/cm, 28 kV) (a)曝光时间40 ns, 相邻两幅图像的时间间隔40 ns; (b)曝光时间40 ns, 相邻两幅图像的时间间隔160 ns, 图中所标的时间是相对高压脉冲起始点的时间

    Figure 3.  Temporal evolution of multi-needle underwater streamer discharge (15 mm, 60 µS/cm, 28 kV): (a) 40 ns exposure, 40 ns interval; (b) 40 ns exposure, 160 ns interval. The time marked in the figure is the time to the start of the high-voltage pulse.

    图 4  单个脉冲放电过程中不同针针间距D、水电导率和外加电压下放电针电极数目随时间的变化 (a) D = 5 mm; (b) D = 10 mm; (c) D = 15 mm; (d) D = 20 mm. 图(b), (c), (d)和图(a)图例相同, 灰色虚线表示21根针电极

    Figure 4.  Temporal evolution of the number of discharged needle electrodes during one discharge pulse at different needle spacings, water conductivities and applied voltages: (a) D = 5 mm; (b) D = 10 mm; (c) D = 15 mm; (d) D = 20 mm. Legends of panels (b), (c) and (d) are the same as that denoted in panel (a), and the gray dashed line indicates 21 needle electrodes.

    图 5  针针间距、水电导率和外加电压对单个脉冲放电过程中最大放电针电极数目的影响 (a) 水电导率60 µS/cm; (b) 水电导率120 µS/cm; (c) 水电导率240 µS/cm; (d) 水电导率480 µS/cm

    Figure 5.  Influence of the needle spacing, the water conductivity and the applied voltage on the maximum number of discharged needles: (a) Water conductivity is 60 µS/cm; (b) 120 µS/cm; (c) 240 µS/cm; (d) 480 µS/cm.

    图 6  (a)不同针针间距下多针电极阵列中边缘电极与内侧电极放电形态差异(40 kV, 240 µS/cm); (b)不同针针间距下多针电极阵列正面的电场分布图(40 kV)

    Figure 6.  (a) Differences in morphology of the inner and outside needles at different needle spacings (40 kV, 240 µS/cm); (b) distribution of the electric field of the multi-needle electrode (front view) at different needle spacings (40 kV).

    图 7  外加电压和针针间距对光斑的影响(120 µS/cm) (a) D = 5 mm; (b) D = 10 mm; (c) D = 15 mm; (d) D = 20 mm

    Figure 7.  Influence of the applied voltage and the needle spacing on the spot size (120 µS/cm): (a) D = 5 mm; (b) D = 10 mm; (c) D = 15 mm; (d) D = 20 mm.

    图 8  (a) 不同针针间距下5针电极水下流光放电的侧面发光图像(40 kV, 240 µS/cm); (b)不同针针间距下5针电极的侧面电力线分布图(40 kV)

    Figure 8.  (a) Lateral emission images of underwater streamer discharge generated from a 5-needle array at different needle spacings (40 kV, 240 µS/cm); (b) electric fluxline of a 5-needle array at different needle spacings (40 kV).

    图 9  电极间距D对流光丝偏离针电极轴线偏角的影响(240 µS/cm, 32 kV)

    Figure 9.  Influence of the electrode spacing on the deviation angle of the streamer filament from the needle axis (240 µS/cm, 32 kV).

    图 10  不同针针间距下5针电极阵列针尖处电场强度(32 kV)

    Figure 10.  Electric field intensity at the tip of the 5-needle array at different needle spacings (32 kV).

    图 11  外加电压和针针间距对放电能量效率的影响(240 µS/cm)

    Figure 11.  Influence of the applied voltage and the needle spacing on the discharge energy efficiency (240 µS/cm).

    Baidu
  • [1]

    Cao Y, Qu G Z, Li T F, Jiang N, Wang T C 2018 Plasma Sci. Technol. 20 103001Google Scholar

    [2]

    Lee H D, Kim J O, Chung J W 2015 Desalin. Water Treat. 53 2767Google Scholar

    [3]

    Wang T C, Qu G Z, Pei S Z, Liang D L, Hu S B 2016 Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 23 13448Google Scholar

    [4]

    Wen X Q, Wang M, Liu X H 2012 IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci. 40 1089Google Scholar

    [5]

    Kim S D, Jang D I, Lim B J, Lee S B, Mok Y S 2013 Plasma Sci. Technol. 15 659Google Scholar

    [6]

    Hijosa-Valsero M, Molina R, Montràs A, Müller M, Bayona J M 2014 Environ. Technol. Rev. 3 71Google Scholar

    [7]

    Schneider M, Rataj R, Kolb J F, Bláha L 2020 Environ. Pollut. 266 115423Google Scholar

    [8]

    Sakugawa T, Aoki N, Akiyama H, Ishibashi K, Watanabe M, Kouda A, Suematsu K 2014 IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci. 42 794Google Scholar

    [9]

    Schoenbach K H, Joshi R P, Stark R H, Dobbs F C, Beebe S J 2000 IEEE Trans. Dielectr. Electr. Insul. 7 637Google Scholar

    [10]

    Foster J E 2017 Phys. Plasmas 24 055501Google Scholar

    [11]

    Banaschik R, Burchhardt G, Zocher K, Hammerschmidt S, Kolb J F, Weltmann K D 2016 Bioelectrochemistry 112 83Google Scholar

    [12]

    An W, Baumung K, Bluhm H 2007 J. Appl. Phys. 101 053302Google Scholar

    [13]

    Locke B R, Thagard S M 2012 Plasma Chem. Plasma P. 32 875Google Scholar

    [14]

    Lesaint O 2016 J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 49 144001Google Scholar

    [15]

    Ceccato P, Guaitella O, Shaper L, Graham B, Rousseau A 2009 IEEE Pulsed Power Conference Washington D. C. , USA, June 28–July 2, 2009 p866

    [16]

    Fujita H, Kanazawa S, Ohtani K, Komiya A, Kaneko T, Sato T 2014 J. Appl. Phys. 116 213301Google Scholar

    [17]

    Fujita H, Kanazawa S, Ohtani K, Komiya A, Sato T 2013 J. Appl. Phys. 113 113304Google Scholar

    [18]

    Katsuki S, Tanaka K, Fudamoto T, Namihira T, Akiyama H, Bluhm H 2006 Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 45 239Google Scholar

    [19]

    Marinov I, Starikovskaia S, Rousseau A 2014 J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 47 224017Google Scholar

    [20]

    Katsuki S, Akiyama H, Abou-Ghazala A, Schoenbach K H 2002 IEEE Trans. Dielectr. Electr. Insul. 9 498Google Scholar

    [21]

    Wen X Q, Liu G S, Ding Z F 2012 IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci. 40 438Google Scholar

    [22]

    Wen X Q, Liu G S, Ding Z F 2011 IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci. 39 1758Google Scholar

    [23]

    Kolb J F, Joshi R P, Xiao S, Schoenbach K H 2008 J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 41 234007Google Scholar

    [24]

    Vanraes P, Bogaerts A 2018 Appl. Phys. Rev. 5 031103Google Scholar

    [25]

    Sharbaugh A H, Devins J C, Rzad S J 1978 IEEE Trans. Electr. Insul. EI-13 249Google Scholar

    [26]

    Jones H M, Kunhardt E E 1994 IEEE Trans. Dielectr. Electr. Insul. 1 1016Google Scholar

    [27]

    Kunhardt E E 1991 Phys. Rev. B 44 4235Google Scholar

    [28]

    Joshi R P, Qian J, Zhao G, Kolb J, Schoenbach K H, Schamiloglu E, Gaudet J 2004 J. Appl. Phys. 96 5129Google Scholar

    [29]

    Shneider M N, Pekker M, Fridman A 2012 IEEE Trans. Dielectr. Electr. Insul. 19 1579Google Scholar

    [30]

    Starikovskiy A, Yang Y, Cho Y I, Fridman A 2011 Plasma Sources Sci. Technol. 20 024003Google Scholar

    [31]

    Marinov I, Guaitella O, Rousseau A, Starikovskaia S M 2013 Plasma Sources Sci. Technol. 22 042001Google Scholar

    [32]

    Banaschik R, Lukes P, Jablonowski H, Hammer M U, Weltmann K D, Kolb J F 2015 Water Res. 84 127Google Scholar

    [33]

    Luke P, Clupek M, Sunka P, Babick V, Janda V 2002 Czech. J. Phys. 52 800

    [34]

    Malik M A, Minamitani Y, Xiao S, Kolb J F, Schoenbach K H 2005 IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci. 33 490Google Scholar

    [35]

    Wen X Q, Liu G S, Ding Z F 2010 IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci. 38 3330Google Scholar

    [36]

    Sugiarto A T, Sato M, Ohshima T, Skalny J D 2002 J. Adv. Oxid. Technol. 5 211Google Scholar

    [37]

    Sugiarto A T, Ohshima T, Sato M 2002 Thin Solid Films 407 174Google Scholar

    [38]

    Lisitsyn I V, Nomiyama H, Katsuki S, Akiyama H 1999 Rev. Sci. Instrum. 70 3457Google Scholar

    [39]

    Wang H J, Li J, Quan X 2006 J. Electrostat. 64 416Google Scholar

    [40]

    Lukes P, Clupek M, Babicky V, Sunka P 2008 IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci. 36 1146Google Scholar

    [41]

    Šunka P 2001 Phys. Plasmas 8 2587Google Scholar

    [42]

    Zhu T Y, Zhang Q G, Shi X Y, Li Z, Yang L J 2008 IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci. 36 237Google Scholar

    [43]

    Zhu T Y, Yang L J, Jia Z J, Zhang Q G 2008 J. Appl. Phys. 104 113302Google Scholar

    [44]

    Hartmann W, Roemheld M, Rohde K D, Spiess F J 2009 IEEE Trans. Dielectr. Electr. Insul. 16 1061Google Scholar

    [45]

    Wang H J, Li J, Quan X, Wu Y 2008 Appl. Catal. B Environ. 83 72Google Scholar

    [46]

    郭沛 2023 学士学位论文 (大连: 大连理工大学)

    Guo P 2023 B. S. Thesis (Dalian: Dalian University of Technology

    [47]

    佟云颢 2021 学士学位论文 (大连: 大连理工大学)

    Tong Y H 2021 B. S. Thesis (Dalian: Dalian University of Technology

    [48]

    Wang L R, Wen X Q, Yang Y T, Wang X 2023 J. Appl. Phys. 134 013302Google Scholar

  • [1] Chen Wei-Long, Guo Rong-Rong, Tong Yu-Shen, Liu Li-Li, Zhou Sheng-Lan, Lin Jin-Hai. Influence of sub-bandgap illumination on electric field distribution at grain boundary in CdZnTe crystals. Acta Physica Sinica, 2022, 71(22): 226101. doi: 10.7498/aps.71.20220896
    [2] Fu Qiang, Wang Cong, Wang Yu-Fei, Chang Zheng-Shi. Comparative study on discharge characteristics of low pressure CO2 driven by sinusoidal AC voltage: DBD and bare electrode structure. Acta Physica Sinica, 2022, 71(11): 115204. doi: 10.7498/aps.71.20220086
    [3] Wang Xue, Wen Xiao-Qiong, Wang Li-Ru, Yang Yuan-Tian, Xue Xiao-Dong. Re-illumination and pause behavior of streamer filament of streamer discharge in water. Acta Physica Sinica, 2022, 71(1): 015203. doi: 10.7498/aps.71.20211162
    [4] Zhang Lin-Cheng, Chen Gang-Jin, Xiao Hui-Ming, Cai Ben-Xiao, Huang Hua, Wu Ling. Preparation and charge storage property of FEP thin film electret with grid electric field distribution in millimeter scale. Acta Physica Sinica, 2015, 64(23): 237701. doi: 10.7498/aps.64.237701
    [5] Feng Jing-Hua, Meng Shi-Jian, Fu Yue-Cheng, Zhou Lin, Xu Rong-Kun, Zhang Jian-Hua, Li Lin-Bo, Zhang Fa-Qiang. Spatiotemporal distribution of hydrogenous electrode vacuum arc discharge plasma. Acta Physica Sinica, 2014, 63(14): 145205. doi: 10.7498/aps.63.145205
    [6] Zhao Qing-Kai, Chen Xiao-Gang, Cui Ji-Feng. Electrostatic potential distribution of high-order weakly nonlinear composites under external direct current electric field. Acta Physica Sinica, 2013, 62(10): 107201. doi: 10.7498/aps.62.107201
    [7] Wang Wei, Yang Lan-Jun, Gao Jie, Liu Shuai. Experimental study on the thrust and the ratio of thrust to power of multi-points/grid ionic wind exciter. Acta Physica Sinica, 2013, 62(7): 075205. doi: 10.7498/aps.62.075205
    [8] Zhang Cheng, Shao Tao, Niu Zheng, Zhang Dong-Dong, Wang Jue, Yan Ping. X-ray generation in repetitive pulsed discharge in atmospheric air with a point-to-plane gap. Acta Physica Sinica, 2012, 61(3): 035202. doi: 10.7498/aps.61.035202
    [9] Hua Jin-Rong, Zu Xiao-Tao, Li Li, Xiang Xia, Chen Meng, Jiang Xiao-Dong, Yuan Xiao-Dong, Zheng Wan-Guo. Numerical simulation of light intensity distribution in the vicinity of three-dimensional Hertzian conical scratch on fused silica subsurface. Acta Physica Sinica, 2010, 59(4): 2519-2524. doi: 10.7498/aps.59.2519
    [10] Huang Xiao-Jing, You Rong-Yi. Distribution of partial electric field and CO molecules adsorbed on the surface of nanostructured nanoellipsoids. Acta Physica Sinica, 2009, 58(2): 1200-1204. doi: 10.7498/aps.58.1200
    [11] Xie Guo-Feng. Improving parallel electrode method by sputtering atoms' angle distribution rule. Acta Physica Sinica, 2008, 57(3): 1784-1787. doi: 10.7498/aps.57.1784
    [12] Wu Chong-Qing, Zhao Shuang. Study on the localization of the electric dipole sources. Acta Physica Sinica, 2007, 56(9): 5180-5184. doi: 10.7498/aps.56.5180
    [13] Yang Peng-Fei, Chen Wen-Xue. The distribution and origination of electric field and charge in interface layer of superconductor. Acta Physica Sinica, 2006, 55(12): 6622-6629. doi: 10.7498/aps.55.6622
    [14] Li Xin-Bei, Zhang Fang-Hui, Wang Xiu-Feng. Electric field distribution in surface-conduction electron-emitter display. Acta Physica Sinica, 2006, 55(11): 6141-6146. doi: 10.7498/aps.55.6141
    [15] Qi Bing, Ren Chun-Sheng, Ma Teng-Cai, Wang You-Nian, Wang De-Zhen. Stabilization of the multi-pin to multi-sphere plane negative corona discharge. Acta Physica Sinica, 2006, 55(1): 331-336. doi: 10.7498/aps.55.331
    [16] Fang Jian, Qiao Ming, Li Zhao-Ji. Electric field distribution in charge imbalance super junction. Acta Physica Sinica, 2006, 55(7): 3656-3663. doi: 10.7498/aps.55.3656
    [17] Xiao Wan-Neng, Zhao Ji, Wang Wei-Jiang, Li Run-Hua, Zhou Jian-Ying. Linear optical absorption properties and internal electromagnetic field distribu tions of periodic multiple quantum wells. Acta Physica Sinica, 2003, 52(9): 2293-2297. doi: 10.7498/aps.52.2293
    [18] CHEN JIAN-WEN, WANG ZHI-JIANG. ELECTRON HOLOGRAPHY AND ITS APPLICATION ON OBSERVATION OF MICRO-ELECTROSTATIC FIELD DISTRIBUTION. Acta Physica Sinica, 1993, 42(12): 1919-1927. doi: 10.7498/aps.42.1919
    [19] ZHANG LIAN-FANG, ZHAO WEN-ZHENG, SHANG REN-CHENG, PAN LI, WANG SHI-LIANG, WEN KE-LING, CHEN DIE-YAN. STUDY OF Ne AUTOIONISING STATES WITH PULSED ELECTRIC FIELD OPTOGALVANIC SPECTROSCOPY. Acta Physica Sinica, 1990, 39(12): 1870-1876. doi: 10.7498/aps.39.1870
    [20] ZHU SHI-TONG, SHEN WEN-DA. STEADY-STATE ELECTRIC FIELD STRUCTURE AND DENSITY PROFILE IN A PLASMA IRRADIATED BY DOUBLE-FREQUENCY LASER. Acta Physica Sinica, 1986, 35(7): 882-888. doi: 10.7498/aps.35.882
Metrics
  • Abstract views:  1512
  • PDF Downloads:  92
  • Cited By: 0
Publishing process
  • Received Date:  29 November 2023
  • Accepted Date:  16 January 2024
  • Available Online:  25 January 2024
  • Published Online:  05 April 2024

/

返回文章
返回
Baidu
map