-
Owing to the high density and high mobility of two-dimensional electron gas (2DEG) induced by strong spontaneous polarization and piezoelectric polarization effect, AlGaN/GaN Schottky barrier diodes (SBDs) with high output current density and low on-resistance have proved to be a promising candidate. Anode of GaN SBD is the core structure, which affects the device performance such as turn-on voltage, reverse current, on-resistance, and breakdown voltage. Therefore, idealized Schottky junction with low interface state density is very important in achieving high-performance GaN SBD. In this work, AlGaN/GaN SBD with low work-function metal W as anode is fabricated, and the post-anode-annealing (PAA) treatment is found to be effective in promoting the bonding reaction between anode metal and GaN in the anode region. Comparing with GaN SBDs without PAA treatment, the interface state density decreases from 9.48×1015 eV–1·cm–2 to 1.77×1013 eV–1·cm–2 after PAA treatment. The reverse leakage current is reduced by two orders, which ascribes to the idealized anode interface with low interface state density. Meanwhile, the influence of interface state on carriers in the forward conduction process is also suppressed, and the differential on-resistance of the fabricated GaN SBDs decreases from 17.05 Ω·mm to 12.57 Ω·mm. It is obvious that the PAA process proves to be an effective method to suppress the interface states density at M/S interface, thus significantly improving the performance of GaN SBD, which is the key technology in fabricating the high-performance GaN device.
[1] Liu X K, Liu Q, Li C, Wang J F, Yu W J, Xu K, Ao J P 2017 Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 56 026501Google Scholar
[2] Bajaj S, Akyol F, Krishnamoorthy S, Zhang Y W, Rajan S 2016 Appl. Phys. Lett. 109 133508Google Scholar
[3] 武鹏, 张涛, 张进成, 郝跃 2022 71 158503Google Scholar
Wu P, Zhang T, Zhang J C, Hao Y 2022 Acta Phys. Sin. 71 158503Google Scholar
[4] 崔艺馨, 马英起, 上官士鹏, 康玄武, 刘鹏程, 韩建伟 2022 71 136102Google Scholar
Cui Y X, Ma Y Q, Shangguan S P, Kang X W, Liu P C, Han J W 2022 Acta Phys. Sin. 71 136102Google Scholar
[5] 陈睿, 梁亚楠, 韩建伟, 王璇, 杨涵, 陈钱, 袁润杰, 马英起, 上官士鹏 2021 70 116102Google Scholar
Chen R, Liang Y N, Han J W, Wang X, Yang H, Chen Q, Yuan R J, Ma Y Q, Shangguan S P 2021 Acta Phys. Sin. 70 116102Google Scholar
[6] Nela L, Erp R V, Kampitsis G, Yildirim H K, Ma J, Matioli E 2021 IEEE T. Power Electr. 36 1269Google Scholar
[7] Nela L, Kampitsis G, Ma J, Matioli E 2020 IEEE Electron Dev. Lett. 41 99Google Scholar
[8] Li X D, Geens K, Guo W M, You S Z, Zhao M, Fahle D, Odnoblyudov V, Groeseneken G, Decoutere S 2019 IEEE Electron Dev. Lett. 40 1499Google Scholar
[9] Bahat-Treidel E, Hilt O, Zhytnytska R, Wentzel A, Meliani C, Wurfl J, Trankle G 2012 IEEE Electron Dev. Lett. 33 357Google Scholar
[10] Hsin Y M, Ke T Y, Lee G Y, Chyi J I, Chiu H C 2012 Phys. Status Solidi C 9 949Google Scholar
[11] Han S W, Yang S, Li R, Wu X K, Sheng K 2019 IEEE T. Power Electr. 34 5012Google Scholar
[12] Xu R, Chen P, Liu M H, Zhou J, Li Y M, Cheng K, Liu B, Chen D J, Xie Z L, Zhang R, Zheng Y D 2021 IEEE Electron Dev. Lett. 42 208Google Scholar
[13] Zhang T, Zhang J C, Zhou H, Wang Y, Chen T S, Zhang K, Zhang Y C, Dang K, Bian Z K, Zhang J F, Xu S R, Duan X L, Ning J, Hao Y 2019 IEEE Electron Dev. Lett. 40 1583Google Scholar
[14] Zhu M D, Song B, Qi M, Hu Z Y, Nomoto K, Yan X D, Cao Y, Johnson W, Kohn E, Jena D, Xing H L G 2015 IEEE Electron Dev. Lett. 36 375Google Scholar
[15] Tsou C W, Wei K P, Lian Y W, Hsu S S H 2016 IEEE Electron Dev. Lett. 37 70Google Scholar
[16] Gao J N, Jin Y F, Xie B, Wen C P, Hao Y L, Shen B, Wang M J 2018 IEEE Electron Dev. Lett. 39 859Google Scholar
[17] Zhang T, Zhang J C, Zhou H, Chen T S, Zhang K, Hu Z Z, Bian Z K, Dang K, Wang Y, Zhang L, Ning J, Ma P J, Hao Y 2018 IEEE Electron Dev. Lett. 39 1548Google Scholar
[18] Zhang T, Wang Y, Zhang Y N, Lü Y G, Ning J, Zhang Y C, Zhou H, Duan X L, Zhang J C, Hao Y 2021 IEEE Trans. Electron Dev. 68 2661Google Scholar
[19] Chen J B, Bian Z K, Liu Z H, Zhu D, Duan X L, Wu Y H, Jia Y Q, Ning J, Zhang J C, Hao Y 2021 J. Alloy Compd. 853 156978Google Scholar
[20] Du L L, Xin Q, Xu M S, Liu Y X, Mu W X, Yan S Q, Wang X Y, Xin G M, Jia Z T, Tao X T, Song A M 2019 IEEE Electron Dev. Lett. 40 451Google Scholar
[21] Bilkan Ç, Gümüş A, Altındal Ş 2015 Mater. Sci. Semicond. Process 39 484Google Scholar
-
-
[1] Liu X K, Liu Q, Li C, Wang J F, Yu W J, Xu K, Ao J P 2017 Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 56 026501Google Scholar
[2] Bajaj S, Akyol F, Krishnamoorthy S, Zhang Y W, Rajan S 2016 Appl. Phys. Lett. 109 133508Google Scholar
[3] 武鹏, 张涛, 张进成, 郝跃 2022 71 158503Google Scholar
Wu P, Zhang T, Zhang J C, Hao Y 2022 Acta Phys. Sin. 71 158503Google Scholar
[4] 崔艺馨, 马英起, 上官士鹏, 康玄武, 刘鹏程, 韩建伟 2022 71 136102Google Scholar
Cui Y X, Ma Y Q, Shangguan S P, Kang X W, Liu P C, Han J W 2022 Acta Phys. Sin. 71 136102Google Scholar
[5] 陈睿, 梁亚楠, 韩建伟, 王璇, 杨涵, 陈钱, 袁润杰, 马英起, 上官士鹏 2021 70 116102Google Scholar
Chen R, Liang Y N, Han J W, Wang X, Yang H, Chen Q, Yuan R J, Ma Y Q, Shangguan S P 2021 Acta Phys. Sin. 70 116102Google Scholar
[6] Nela L, Erp R V, Kampitsis G, Yildirim H K, Ma J, Matioli E 2021 IEEE T. Power Electr. 36 1269Google Scholar
[7] Nela L, Kampitsis G, Ma J, Matioli E 2020 IEEE Electron Dev. Lett. 41 99Google Scholar
[8] Li X D, Geens K, Guo W M, You S Z, Zhao M, Fahle D, Odnoblyudov V, Groeseneken G, Decoutere S 2019 IEEE Electron Dev. Lett. 40 1499Google Scholar
[9] Bahat-Treidel E, Hilt O, Zhytnytska R, Wentzel A, Meliani C, Wurfl J, Trankle G 2012 IEEE Electron Dev. Lett. 33 357Google Scholar
[10] Hsin Y M, Ke T Y, Lee G Y, Chyi J I, Chiu H C 2012 Phys. Status Solidi C 9 949Google Scholar
[11] Han S W, Yang S, Li R, Wu X K, Sheng K 2019 IEEE T. Power Electr. 34 5012Google Scholar
[12] Xu R, Chen P, Liu M H, Zhou J, Li Y M, Cheng K, Liu B, Chen D J, Xie Z L, Zhang R, Zheng Y D 2021 IEEE Electron Dev. Lett. 42 208Google Scholar
[13] Zhang T, Zhang J C, Zhou H, Wang Y, Chen T S, Zhang K, Zhang Y C, Dang K, Bian Z K, Zhang J F, Xu S R, Duan X L, Ning J, Hao Y 2019 IEEE Electron Dev. Lett. 40 1583Google Scholar
[14] Zhu M D, Song B, Qi M, Hu Z Y, Nomoto K, Yan X D, Cao Y, Johnson W, Kohn E, Jena D, Xing H L G 2015 IEEE Electron Dev. Lett. 36 375Google Scholar
[15] Tsou C W, Wei K P, Lian Y W, Hsu S S H 2016 IEEE Electron Dev. Lett. 37 70Google Scholar
[16] Gao J N, Jin Y F, Xie B, Wen C P, Hao Y L, Shen B, Wang M J 2018 IEEE Electron Dev. Lett. 39 859Google Scholar
[17] Zhang T, Zhang J C, Zhou H, Chen T S, Zhang K, Hu Z Z, Bian Z K, Dang K, Wang Y, Zhang L, Ning J, Ma P J, Hao Y 2018 IEEE Electron Dev. Lett. 39 1548Google Scholar
[18] Zhang T, Wang Y, Zhang Y N, Lü Y G, Ning J, Zhang Y C, Zhou H, Duan X L, Zhang J C, Hao Y 2021 IEEE Trans. Electron Dev. 68 2661Google Scholar
[19] Chen J B, Bian Z K, Liu Z H, Zhu D, Duan X L, Wu Y H, Jia Y Q, Ning J, Zhang J C, Hao Y 2021 J. Alloy Compd. 853 156978Google Scholar
[20] Du L L, Xin Q, Xu M S, Liu Y X, Mu W X, Yan S Q, Wang X Y, Xin G M, Jia Z T, Tao X T, Song A M 2019 IEEE Electron Dev. Lett. 40 451Google Scholar
[21] Bilkan Ç, Gümüş A, Altındal Ş 2015 Mater. Sci. Semicond. Process 39 484Google Scholar
Catalog
Metrics
- Abstract views: 2744
- PDF Downloads: 53
- Cited By: 0