-
Topological electronic materials exhibit many novel physical properties, such as low dissipation transport and high carrier mobility. These extraordinary properties originate from their non-trivial topological electronic structures in momentum space. In recent years, topological phase transitions based on topological electronic materials have gradually become one of the hot topics in condensed matter physics. Using first-principles calculations, we explore the topological phase transitions driven by in-plane strain in ternary pyrochlore oxide Tl2Ta2O7. Firstly, we analyze the atomic-orbital-resolved band structure and find that the O (px+py) and pz orbitals of the system near the Fermi level have band inversion, indicating the emergence of topological phase transitions in the system. Then the tight-binding models are constructed to calculate the Z2 topological invariants, which can determine the topologically non-trivial feature of the system. Finally, topological properties such as surface states and a three-dimensional Dirac cone are studied. It is found that Tl2Ta2O7 without strain is a semimetal with a quadratic band touching point at Fermi level, while the in-plane strain can drive the topological phase transition via breaking crystalline symmetries. When the system is under the –1% in-plane compression strain and without considering the spin orbit coupling (SOC), the application of strain results in two triply degenerate nodal points formed in the –Z to Γ direction and Γ to Z direction, respectively. When the SOC is included, there are two fourfold degenerate Dirac points on the –Z to Γ path and Γ to Z path, respectively. Thus, the –1% in-plane compression strain makes the system transit from the quadratic contact point semimetal to a Dirac semimetal. When 1% in-plane expansion strain is applied and the SOC is neglected, there exists one band intersection along Y→Γ. When the SOC is taken into consideration, the gap is opened. Therefore, the 1% in-plane expansion strain drives Tl2Ta2O7 into a strong topological insulator. In addition, the system is also expected to have strong correlation effect and superconductivity due to the possible flat band. This work can guide the study of topological phase transitions in three-dimensional materials and provide a good material platform for the design of low-dissipation electronic devices.
-
Keywords:
- topological insulator /
- topological phase transition /
- Dirac semimetal
[1] Bernevig B A, Hughes T L, Zhang S C 2006 Science 314 1757Google Scholar
[2] 王航天, 赵海慧, 温良恭, 吴晓君, 聂天晓, 赵巍胜 2020 69 200704Google Scholar
Wang H T, Zhao H H, Wen L G, Wu X J, Nie T X, Zhao W S 2020 Acta Phys. Sin. 69 200704Google Scholar
[3] Tian W, Yu W, Shi J, Wang Y 2017 Materials 10 814Google Scholar
[4] Lü H, Wang Z, Cheng Q, Zhang W, Yu R 2021 Phys. Rev. B 103 L241115Google Scholar
[5] Hu J, Xu S Y, Ni N, Mao Z 2019 Annu. Rev. Mater. Res. 49 207Google Scholar
[6] Zhang W, Wu Q, Yazyev O V, Weng H, Guo Z, Cheng W D, Chai G L 2018 Phys. Rev. B 98 115411Google Scholar
[7] Chen Z, Hu Y, Zhu Z, Zhang W 2020 New J. Phys. 22 093055Google Scholar
[8] Yuan D, Hu Y, Yang Y, Zhang W 2021 Chin. Phys. Lett. 38 117301Google Scholar
[9] Ferreira P P, Manesco A L R, Dorini T T, et al. 2021 Phys. Rev. B 103 125134Google Scholar
[10] Cao W, Tang P, Xu Y, Wu J, Gu B L, Duan W 2017 Phys. Rev. B 96 115203Google Scholar
[11] Jitta R R, Gundeboina R, Veldurthi N K, Guje R, Muga V 2015 J. Chem. Technol. Biot. 90 1937Google Scholar
[12] Kim M, Park J, Kang M, Kim J Y, Lee S W 2020 ACS Cent. Sci. 6 880Google Scholar
[13] Yang B J, Kim Y B 2010 Phys. Rev. B 82 085111Google Scholar
[14] Wan X, Turner A M, Vishwanath A, Savrasov S Y 2011 Phys. Rev. B 83 205101Google Scholar
[15] Sakata M, Kagayama T, Shimizu K, Matsuhira K, Takagi S, Wakeshima M, Hinatsu Y 2011 Phys. Rev. B 83 041102(RGoogle Scholar
[16] Hase I, Yanagisawa T 2020 Symmetry 12 1076Google Scholar
[17] Das M, Bhowal S, Sannigrahi J, et al. 2022 Phys. Rev. B 105 134421Google Scholar
[18] Hu Y, Yue C, Yuan D, et al. 2022 Sci. China Phys. Mech. Astron. 65 297211Google Scholar
[19] Zhang W, Luo K, Chen Z, Zhu Z, Yu R, Fang C, Weng H 2019 npj Comput. Mater. 5 105Google Scholar
[20] Hase I, Yanagisawa T, Kawashima K 2019 Nanomaterials 9 876Google Scholar
[21] Kresse G, Furthmüller J 1996 Comput. Mater. Sci. 6 15Google Scholar
[22] Kresse G, Furthmüller J 1996 Phys. Rev. B 54 11169Google Scholar
[23] Blöchl P E 1994 Phys. Rev. B 50 17953Google Scholar
[24] Kresse G, Joubert D 1999 Phys. Rev. B 59 1758Google Scholar
[25] Perdew J P, Burke K, Ernzerhof M 1996 Phys. Rev. Lett. 77 3865Google Scholar
[26] Marzari N, Vanderbilt D 1997 Phys. Rev. B 56 12847Google Scholar
[27] Souza I, Marzari N, Vanderbilt D 2001 Phys. Rev. B 65 035109Google Scholar
[28] Wu Q, Zhang S, Song H F, Troyer M, Soluyanov A A 2018 Comput. Phys. Commun. 224 405Google Scholar
[29] 杜永平, 刘慧美, 万贤纲 2015 64 187201Google Scholar
Du Y P, Liu H M, Wan X G 2015 Acta Phys. Sin. 64 187201Google Scholar
[30] Sheng X L, Wang Z, Yu R, Weng H, Fang Z, Dai X 2014 Phys. Rev. B 90 245308Google Scholar
[31] Wang Z, Weng H, Wu Q, et al. 2013 Phys. Rev. B 88 125427Google Scholar
[32] Cvetkovic V, Vafek O 2013 Phys. Rev. B 88 134510Google Scholar
[33] Yakovkin I N, Petrova N V 2021 Phys. Lett. A 403 127398Google Scholar
[34] Liu M Y, Gong L, He Y, Cao C 2021 Phys. Rev. B 103 075421Google Scholar
[35] Yalameha S, Nourbakhsh Z, Vaez A 2018 J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 468 279Google Scholar
[36] Zhang Q, Cheng Y, Schwingenschlögl U 2013 Phys. Rev. B 88 155317Google Scholar
[37] Yu R, Qi X, Bernevig A, Fang Z, Dai X 2011 Phys. Rev. B 84 075119Google Scholar
[38] Grusdt F, Abanin D, Demler E 2014 Phys. Rev. A 89 043621Google Scholar
[39] Qi X L, Zhang S C 2010 Phys. Today 63 33Google Scholar
-
图 2 Tl2Ta2O7的能带结构 (a) 未施加应变时, 不考虑SOC(黑色实线)和考虑SOC(红色虚线)时的能带结构; (b) Γ点费米能级附近能带的放大图. SOC相互作用下体系的轨道分辨能带图 (c) 未施加应变; (d) 应变为–1% (平面内压缩); (e) 应变为1% (平面内拉伸)
Figure 2. Band structures of Tl2Ta2O7 system: (a) Non-SOC (black solid lines) and SOC (red dashed lines) band structures without strain; (b) the zoom-in band structure around Γ point near the Fermi level. SOC orbital-resolved band structure: (c) Without strain; (d) with strain of –1% (in-plane compression); (e) with strain of 1% (in-plane expansion).
图 3 考虑SOC时, 施加–1% (平面内压缩)应变的Tl2Ta2O7 (100) 表面的拓扑性质 (a) 狄拉克点和拓扑表面态(右图为费米能级附近的放大图); (b) 狄拉克锥三维立体图
Figure 3. Topological properties of Tl2Ta2O7 with SOC on (100) surface under –1% (in-plane compression) strain: (a) Dirac point and topological surface states (The right panel shows the enlarged image near the Fermi level); (b) three-dimensional display of the Dirac cone.
图 4 考虑SOC时, 施加1% (平面内拉伸)应变的Tl2Ta2O7 (100)表面的拓扑性质 (a) g3 = 0平面和(b) g3 = π平面Wannier电荷中心(WCC)的演化, g1, 2, 3是原胞的倒格子基矢. Wannier中心(黑线)与参考线(红线)在g3 = 0平面上相交1次, 而在g3 = π平面上相交0次. (c) 拓扑表面态及其费米能级附近的放大图
Figure 4. Topological properties of Tl2Ta2O7 with SOC on (100) surface under 1% (in-plane expansion) strain. Evolution of the Wannier charge centers (WCC) in (a) g3 = 0 plane and (b) g3 = π plane, where g1, 2, 3 are reciprocal vectors of the primitive lattice. The WCC (black lines) cross the reference line (red line) once in the g3 = 0 plane and zero times in the g3 = π plane. (c) Topological surface states. The right panel shows the enlarged image near the Fermi level.
-
[1] Bernevig B A, Hughes T L, Zhang S C 2006 Science 314 1757Google Scholar
[2] 王航天, 赵海慧, 温良恭, 吴晓君, 聂天晓, 赵巍胜 2020 69 200704Google Scholar
Wang H T, Zhao H H, Wen L G, Wu X J, Nie T X, Zhao W S 2020 Acta Phys. Sin. 69 200704Google Scholar
[3] Tian W, Yu W, Shi J, Wang Y 2017 Materials 10 814Google Scholar
[4] Lü H, Wang Z, Cheng Q, Zhang W, Yu R 2021 Phys. Rev. B 103 L241115Google Scholar
[5] Hu J, Xu S Y, Ni N, Mao Z 2019 Annu. Rev. Mater. Res. 49 207Google Scholar
[6] Zhang W, Wu Q, Yazyev O V, Weng H, Guo Z, Cheng W D, Chai G L 2018 Phys. Rev. B 98 115411Google Scholar
[7] Chen Z, Hu Y, Zhu Z, Zhang W 2020 New J. Phys. 22 093055Google Scholar
[8] Yuan D, Hu Y, Yang Y, Zhang W 2021 Chin. Phys. Lett. 38 117301Google Scholar
[9] Ferreira P P, Manesco A L R, Dorini T T, et al. 2021 Phys. Rev. B 103 125134Google Scholar
[10] Cao W, Tang P, Xu Y, Wu J, Gu B L, Duan W 2017 Phys. Rev. B 96 115203Google Scholar
[11] Jitta R R, Gundeboina R, Veldurthi N K, Guje R, Muga V 2015 J. Chem. Technol. Biot. 90 1937Google Scholar
[12] Kim M, Park J, Kang M, Kim J Y, Lee S W 2020 ACS Cent. Sci. 6 880Google Scholar
[13] Yang B J, Kim Y B 2010 Phys. Rev. B 82 085111Google Scholar
[14] Wan X, Turner A M, Vishwanath A, Savrasov S Y 2011 Phys. Rev. B 83 205101Google Scholar
[15] Sakata M, Kagayama T, Shimizu K, Matsuhira K, Takagi S, Wakeshima M, Hinatsu Y 2011 Phys. Rev. B 83 041102(RGoogle Scholar
[16] Hase I, Yanagisawa T 2020 Symmetry 12 1076Google Scholar
[17] Das M, Bhowal S, Sannigrahi J, et al. 2022 Phys. Rev. B 105 134421Google Scholar
[18] Hu Y, Yue C, Yuan D, et al. 2022 Sci. China Phys. Mech. Astron. 65 297211Google Scholar
[19] Zhang W, Luo K, Chen Z, Zhu Z, Yu R, Fang C, Weng H 2019 npj Comput. Mater. 5 105Google Scholar
[20] Hase I, Yanagisawa T, Kawashima K 2019 Nanomaterials 9 876Google Scholar
[21] Kresse G, Furthmüller J 1996 Comput. Mater. Sci. 6 15Google Scholar
[22] Kresse G, Furthmüller J 1996 Phys. Rev. B 54 11169Google Scholar
[23] Blöchl P E 1994 Phys. Rev. B 50 17953Google Scholar
[24] Kresse G, Joubert D 1999 Phys. Rev. B 59 1758Google Scholar
[25] Perdew J P, Burke K, Ernzerhof M 1996 Phys. Rev. Lett. 77 3865Google Scholar
[26] Marzari N, Vanderbilt D 1997 Phys. Rev. B 56 12847Google Scholar
[27] Souza I, Marzari N, Vanderbilt D 2001 Phys. Rev. B 65 035109Google Scholar
[28] Wu Q, Zhang S, Song H F, Troyer M, Soluyanov A A 2018 Comput. Phys. Commun. 224 405Google Scholar
[29] 杜永平, 刘慧美, 万贤纲 2015 64 187201Google Scholar
Du Y P, Liu H M, Wan X G 2015 Acta Phys. Sin. 64 187201Google Scholar
[30] Sheng X L, Wang Z, Yu R, Weng H, Fang Z, Dai X 2014 Phys. Rev. B 90 245308Google Scholar
[31] Wang Z, Weng H, Wu Q, et al. 2013 Phys. Rev. B 88 125427Google Scholar
[32] Cvetkovic V, Vafek O 2013 Phys. Rev. B 88 134510Google Scholar
[33] Yakovkin I N, Petrova N V 2021 Phys. Lett. A 403 127398Google Scholar
[34] Liu M Y, Gong L, He Y, Cao C 2021 Phys. Rev. B 103 075421Google Scholar
[35] Yalameha S, Nourbakhsh Z, Vaez A 2018 J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 468 279Google Scholar
[36] Zhang Q, Cheng Y, Schwingenschlögl U 2013 Phys. Rev. B 88 155317Google Scholar
[37] Yu R, Qi X, Bernevig A, Fang Z, Dai X 2011 Phys. Rev. B 84 075119Google Scholar
[38] Grusdt F, Abanin D, Demler E 2014 Phys. Rev. A 89 043621Google Scholar
[39] Qi X L, Zhang S C 2010 Phys. Today 63 33Google Scholar
Catalog
Metrics
- Abstract views: 3442
- PDF Downloads: 87
- Cited By: 0