-
The mechanical properties of ultra-high strength martensite steel strongly depend on the shape, size and content of the reversed austenite. In general, the plasticity and toughness of the materials can be improved effectively by increasing the content of the reversed austenite. After aging treatment of Cu-bearing as-quenched steel with martensitic microstructure, Cu particles precipitate at the boundary of martensitic structure and act as heterogeneous nucleation sites to promote the nucleation of reversed austenite. In order to explore the effects of different alloying elements on heterogeneous nucleation of reversed austenite on Cu particles, the effects of X (X = Cr, Al, Mo, W, Ni, Co, Mn) on the interfacial properties of Cu/γ-Fe are studied via first-principles method. The adhesion work, interfacial energy and electronic structure of the interfaces before and after the replacement of Cu and Fe atoms at Cu/γ-Fe boundaries are calculated. The results show that when the alloying elements replace Cu atoms at the Cu/γ-Fe interface, strong X—Fe covalent bond forms at the Cu/γ-Fe interface, the adhesion work increases and the interfacial energy decreases, and thus improve the heterogeneous nucleation capability of reverted γ-Fe on Cu particles. When Fe atoms at the interface are replaced, the stability of the interface changes little, and the bonding between the doped atoms and the neighboring atoms is weak.
-
Keywords:
- first-principles /
- reversed austenite /
- heterogeneous nucleation /
- adhesion work
[1] Garrison W M 1990 JOM 42 20Google Scholar
[2] Skubisz P, Sinczak J 2018 Aircr. Eng. Aerosp. Technol. 90 713Google Scholar
[3] Jia L J, Hui H B, Yu Q H, Song Y 2014 Adv. Mater. Res. 859 238Google Scholar
[4] Mou B, Zhou W, Qiao Q, Feng P, Wu C 2021 Eng. Struct. 228 111483Google Scholar
[5] Wang Y, Sun J, Jiang T, Jiang T, Sun Y, Guo S, Liu Y 2018 Acta Mater. 158 247Google Scholar
[6] Zhao L, Chen X, Wu T, Zhai Q 2020 Materials. 13 4340Google Scholar
[7] Zhou J H, Shen Y F, Hong Y Y, Xue W Y, Misra R D K 2020 Mater. Sci. Eng., A 769 138471Google Scholar
[8] Malakondaiah G, Srinivas M, Murthy J M, Rao P R 1994 Bull. Mater. Sci. 17 73Google Scholar
[9] Ayer R, Machmeier P M 1993 Metall. Trans. A 24 1943Google Scholar
[10] Viswanathan U K, Dey G K, Sethumadhavan V 2005 Mater. Sci. Eng., A 398 367Google Scholar
[11] Tomohiko H, Tomohiro K, Koh-ichi S 2010 Bull. Tsuy. Nat. Coll. Technol. 52 9
[12] He Y, Yang K, Qu W, Kong F, Su G 2002 Mater. Lett. 56 763Google Scholar
[13] Machmeier P, Matuszewski T, Jones R, Ayer R 1997 J. Mater. Eng. Perform. 6 279Google Scholar
[14] Gruber M, Ressel G, F Méndez Martín, Ploberger S, Marsoner S, Ebner R 2016 Metall. Mater. Trans. A 47 1Google Scholar
[15] Govindaraj V, Hodgson P, Singh R P, Beladi H 2021 Mater. Sci. Eng., A 808 140909Google Scholar
[16] Huang D, Yan J, Zuo X 2019 Mater. Charact. 155 109786Google Scholar
[17] Vanderbilt D 1990 Phys. Rev. B:Condens. Matter. 41 7892Google Scholar
[18] Perdew J P, Burke K, Ernzerhof M 1996 Phys. Rev. lett. 77 3865Google Scholar
[19] Bitter F, Kaufmann A R 1939 Phys. Rev. 56 1044Google Scholar
[20] Li Y, Gao Y, Xiao B, Min T, Fan Z, Ma S, Yi D 2011 Comput. Mater. Sci. 50 939Google Scholar
[21] Liu P, Han X, Sun D, Sun D, Chen Z, Wang Q 2018 Intermetallics 96 49Google Scholar
[22] Lü Z, Xiao S, Xiao Z, Xiao S, Xiao Z, Qian L, Wang W, Zhou Y, Fu W 2017 J. Alloys Compd. 718 139Google Scholar
[23] Yang G, Liu Y, Hang Z, Xi N, Fu H, Chen H 2019 J. Rare Earths 37 773Google Scholar
[24] Sun M, Tang W, Ren Q, Wang S, Yu J, Du Y 2015 Appl. Surf. Sci. 356 110Google Scholar
[25] Yang J, Huang J, Fan D, Chen S, Zhao X 2016 Appl. Surf. Sci. 384 207Google Scholar
[26] Zhao X, Zhuo Y, Liu S, Zou Y, Zhao C, Wang C, Yang Q 2016 Surf. Coat. Technol. 305 200Google Scholar
[27] Zhao X, Yuan X, Liu S, Zhao C, Wang C, Zhou Y, Yang Q 2017 J. Alloys Compd. 695 1753Google Scholar
[28] Christensen M, Dudiy S, Wahnstrm G 2002 Phys. Rev. B 65 045408Google Scholar
[29] Han Y F, Dai Y B, Wang J, Shu D, Sun B D 2011 Appl. Surf. Sci. 257 7831Google Scholar
[30] Lu S, Hu Q M, Yang R, Johansson B, Vitos L 2010 Phys. Rev. B. 82 195103Google Scholar
[31] Yang J, Zhang P, Zhou Y, Guo J, Ren X, Yang Y, Yang Q 2013 J. Alloys Compd. 556 160Google Scholar
[32] Segall M D, Shah R, Pickard C J, Payne M C 1996 Phys. Rev. B:Condens. Matter. 54 16317Google Scholar
-
图 4 (a) 掺杂前界面的分波态密度; (b)—(h) Cr, Al, Mo, W, Ni, Co和Mn替换Cu原子后界面的分波态密度
Figure 4. (a) Partial density of states on the interface for Cu(010)/γ-Fe(010) before doping; (b)–(h) partial density of states on the interface for Cu(010)/γ-Fe(010) after replacing Cu by Cr, Al, Mo, W, Ni, Co, and Mn, respectively.
图 5 (a)掺杂前界面的分波态密度; (b)—(h) Cr, Al, Mo, W, Ni, Co和Mn替换Fe原子后界面的分波态密度
Figure 5. (a) Partial density of states on the interface for Cu(010)/γ-Fe(010) before doping; (b)–(h) partial density of states on the interface for Cu(010)/γ-Fe(010) after replacing Fe by by Cr, Al, Mo, W, Ni, Co, and Mn, respectively.
表 1 Cu(010)和γ-Fe(010)表面能收敛趋势
Table 1. Convergence of Cu(010) and γ-Fe(010) surface energy.
Number of pils N $ {E}_{\mathrm{s}\mathrm{u}\mathrm{r}\mathrm{f}}^{\mathrm{C}\mathrm{u}} $/(J·m–2) $ {E}_{\mathrm{s}\mathrm{u}\mathrm{r}\mathrm{f}}^{\mathrm{F}\mathrm{e}} $/(J·m–2) 5 1.41 3.79 7 1.44 3.75 9 1.43 3.76 11 1.44 3.75 表 2 合金元素X替换Cu前后界面布居分析
Table 2. Mulliken population analysis on the interface for Cu(010)/γ-Fe(010) before and after replacement of Cu by alloying element X
Atom Total electron/e Transfer charge/e Atom Total electron/e Transfer charge/e Cu 11.14 –0.14 Fe 7.90 0.10 Cr 13.76 0.24 Fe 7.97 0.03 Al 2.89 0.11 Fe 8.04 –0.04 Mo 13.73 0.27 Fe 8.03 –0.03 W 8.01 –0.01 Fe 13.92 0.08 Ni 9.83 0.17 Fe 7.98 0.02 Co 8.74 0.26 Fe 7.96 0.04 Mn 6.55 0.45 Fe 8.00 0 表 3 合金元素X替换Cu和Fe前后界面原子键长
Table 3. Bond length on the interface for Cu(010)/γ-Fe(010) before and after replacement of Cu or Fe by alloying element X
键 键长/Å 键 键长/Å Cu—Fe 2.42 Cu—Fe 2.42 Cr—Fe 2.06 Cr—Cu 2.48 Al—Fe 2.39 Al—Cu 2.53 Mo—Fe 2.23 Mo—Cu 2.57 W—Fe 2.28 W—Cu 2.57 Ni—Fe 2.31 Ni—Cu 2.48 Co—Fe 2.20 Co—Cu 2.41 Mn—Fe 2.13 Mn—Cu 2.47 表 4 合金元素X替换Fe前后界面布居分析
Table 4. Mulliken population analysis on the interface for Cu(010)/γ-Fe(010) before and after replacement of Fe by alloying element X atom.
Atom Total electron/e Transfer charge/e Atom Total electron/e Transfer charge/e Fe 7.90 0.10 Cu 11.14 –0.14 Cr 13.86 0.14 Cu 11.10 –0.10 Al 3.03 –0.03 Cu 11.11 –0.11 Mo 13.90 0.10 Cu 11.20 –0.20 W 14.09 –0.09 Cu 11.19 –0.19 Ni 11.04 –0.04 Cu 11.10 –0.10 Co 8.94 0.06 Cu 11.12 –0.12 Mn 6.67 0.33 Cu 11.18 –0.18 -
[1] Garrison W M 1990 JOM 42 20Google Scholar
[2] Skubisz P, Sinczak J 2018 Aircr. Eng. Aerosp. Technol. 90 713Google Scholar
[3] Jia L J, Hui H B, Yu Q H, Song Y 2014 Adv. Mater. Res. 859 238Google Scholar
[4] Mou B, Zhou W, Qiao Q, Feng P, Wu C 2021 Eng. Struct. 228 111483Google Scholar
[5] Wang Y, Sun J, Jiang T, Jiang T, Sun Y, Guo S, Liu Y 2018 Acta Mater. 158 247Google Scholar
[6] Zhao L, Chen X, Wu T, Zhai Q 2020 Materials. 13 4340Google Scholar
[7] Zhou J H, Shen Y F, Hong Y Y, Xue W Y, Misra R D K 2020 Mater. Sci. Eng., A 769 138471Google Scholar
[8] Malakondaiah G, Srinivas M, Murthy J M, Rao P R 1994 Bull. Mater. Sci. 17 73Google Scholar
[9] Ayer R, Machmeier P M 1993 Metall. Trans. A 24 1943Google Scholar
[10] Viswanathan U K, Dey G K, Sethumadhavan V 2005 Mater. Sci. Eng., A 398 367Google Scholar
[11] Tomohiko H, Tomohiro K, Koh-ichi S 2010 Bull. Tsuy. Nat. Coll. Technol. 52 9
[12] He Y, Yang K, Qu W, Kong F, Su G 2002 Mater. Lett. 56 763Google Scholar
[13] Machmeier P, Matuszewski T, Jones R, Ayer R 1997 J. Mater. Eng. Perform. 6 279Google Scholar
[14] Gruber M, Ressel G, F Méndez Martín, Ploberger S, Marsoner S, Ebner R 2016 Metall. Mater. Trans. A 47 1Google Scholar
[15] Govindaraj V, Hodgson P, Singh R P, Beladi H 2021 Mater. Sci. Eng., A 808 140909Google Scholar
[16] Huang D, Yan J, Zuo X 2019 Mater. Charact. 155 109786Google Scholar
[17] Vanderbilt D 1990 Phys. Rev. B:Condens. Matter. 41 7892Google Scholar
[18] Perdew J P, Burke K, Ernzerhof M 1996 Phys. Rev. lett. 77 3865Google Scholar
[19] Bitter F, Kaufmann A R 1939 Phys. Rev. 56 1044Google Scholar
[20] Li Y, Gao Y, Xiao B, Min T, Fan Z, Ma S, Yi D 2011 Comput. Mater. Sci. 50 939Google Scholar
[21] Liu P, Han X, Sun D, Sun D, Chen Z, Wang Q 2018 Intermetallics 96 49Google Scholar
[22] Lü Z, Xiao S, Xiao Z, Xiao S, Xiao Z, Qian L, Wang W, Zhou Y, Fu W 2017 J. Alloys Compd. 718 139Google Scholar
[23] Yang G, Liu Y, Hang Z, Xi N, Fu H, Chen H 2019 J. Rare Earths 37 773Google Scholar
[24] Sun M, Tang W, Ren Q, Wang S, Yu J, Du Y 2015 Appl. Surf. Sci. 356 110Google Scholar
[25] Yang J, Huang J, Fan D, Chen S, Zhao X 2016 Appl. Surf. Sci. 384 207Google Scholar
[26] Zhao X, Zhuo Y, Liu S, Zou Y, Zhao C, Wang C, Yang Q 2016 Surf. Coat. Technol. 305 200Google Scholar
[27] Zhao X, Yuan X, Liu S, Zhao C, Wang C, Zhou Y, Yang Q 2017 J. Alloys Compd. 695 1753Google Scholar
[28] Christensen M, Dudiy S, Wahnstrm G 2002 Phys. Rev. B 65 045408Google Scholar
[29] Han Y F, Dai Y B, Wang J, Shu D, Sun B D 2011 Appl. Surf. Sci. 257 7831Google Scholar
[30] Lu S, Hu Q M, Yang R, Johansson B, Vitos L 2010 Phys. Rev. B. 82 195103Google Scholar
[31] Yang J, Zhang P, Zhou Y, Guo J, Ren X, Yang Y, Yang Q 2013 J. Alloys Compd. 556 160Google Scholar
[32] Segall M D, Shah R, Pickard C J, Payne M C 1996 Phys. Rev. B:Condens. Matter. 54 16317Google Scholar
Catalog
Metrics
- Abstract views: 4538
- PDF Downloads: 82
- Cited By: 0