Search

Article

x

留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

Propagation of dark soliton in nonlocal nonlinear coupler

Li Sen-Qing Zhang Xiao Lin Ji

Citation:

Propagation of dark soliton in nonlocal nonlinear coupler

Li Sen-Qing, Zhang Xiao, Lin Ji
PDF
HTML
Get Citation
  • The characteristics of fundamental and mutipole dark solitons in the nonlocal nonlinear couplers are studied through numerical simulation in this work. Firstly, the fundamental dark solitons with different parameters are obtained by the Newton iteration. It is found that the amplitude and beam width of the ground state dark soliton increase with the enhancement of the nonlocality degree. As the nonlinear parameters increase or the propagation constant decreases, the amplitude of the fundamental dark soliton increases and the beam width decreases. The power of the fundamental dark soliton increases with the nonlocality degree and nonlinear parameters increasing, and decreases with the propagation constant increasing. The refractive index induced by the light field decreases with the nonlocality degree increasing and the propagation constant decreasing. The amplitudes of the two components of the fundamental dark soliton can be identical by adjusting the coupling coefficient. These numerical results are also verified in the case of multipole dark solitons. Secondly, the transmission stability of fundamental and mutipole dark solitons are studied. The stability of dark soliton is verified by the linear stability analysis and fractional Fourier evolution. It is found that the fundamental dark solitons are stable in their existing regions, while the stable region of the multipolar dark solitons depends on the nonlocality degree and the propagation constant. Finally, these different types of dark dipole solitons and dark tripole solitons are obtained by changing different parameters, and their structures affect the stability of dark soliton. It is found that the multipole dark soliton with potential well is more stable than that with potential barrier. The refractive-index distribution dependent spacing between the adjacent multipole dark solitons favors their stability.
      Corresponding author: Lin Ji, linji@zjnu.edu.cn
    • Funds: Project supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 11835011, 12004338)
    [1]

    Lederer F, Stegeman G I, Christodoulides D N, Assanto G, Segev M, Silberg Y 2008 Phys. Rep. 463 1Google Scholar

    [2]

    Wu Y D 2004 Fiber Integr. Opt. 23 405Google Scholar

    [3]

    Nistazakis H E, Frantzeskakis D J, Atai J, Malomed A B, Efremidis N, Hizanidis K 2002 Phys. Rev. E 65 036605Google Scholar

    [4]

    Malomed B A, Peng G D, Chu P L 1996 Opt. Lett. 21 330Google Scholar

    [5]

    Harel A, Malomed B A 2014 Phys. Rev. A 89 043809Google Scholar

    [6]

    Mak W C, Malomed B A, Chu P L 2004 Phys. Rev. E 69 279

    [7]

    Trillo S, Wabnitz S 1988 J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 5 483Google Scholar

    [8]

    Smirnova D A, Gorbach A V, Iorsh I V, Shadrivov I V, Kivshar Y S 2013 Phys. Rev. B 88 045443Google Scholar

    [9]

    Albuch L, Malomed B A 2007 Math. Comput. Simul. 74 312Google Scholar

    [10]

    黄光桥, 林机 2017 66 054208Google Scholar

    Huang G Q, Lin J 2017 Acta Phys. Sin. 66 054208Google Scholar

    [11]

    Gubeskys A, Malomed B A 2007 Phys. Rev. A 75 063602Google Scholar

    [12]

    Zhao X, Tian B, Qu Q X, Yuan Y Q, Du X X, Chu M X 2020 Mod. Phys. Lett. B 34 2050282

    [13]

    Stegeman G I, Assanto G, Zanoni R, Seaton C T, Garmire E, Maradudin A A, Reinisch R, Vitrant G 1988 Appl. Phys. Lett. 52 869Google Scholar

    [14]

    Krölikowski W, Bang O, Nikolov N I, Neshev D, Wyller J, Rasmussen J J, Edmundson D 2004 J. Opt. B: Quantum Semiclassical Opt. 6 S288Google Scholar

    [15]

    Conti C, Peccianti M, Assanto G 2003 Phys. Rev. Lett. 91 073902Google Scholar

    [16]

    Jia J, Lin J 2012 Opt. Express 20 7469Google Scholar

    [17]

    Liang G, Dang D L, Li W, Li H G, Guo Q 2020 New J. Phys. 22 073024Google Scholar

    [18]

    Chen M N, Ping X R, Liang G, Guo Q, Lu D Q, Hu W 2018 Phys. Rev. A 97 013829Google Scholar

    [19]

    Mitchell M, Segev M, Christodoulides D N 1998 Phys. Rev. Lett. 80 4657Google Scholar

    [20]

    Dreischuh A, Neshev D N, Petersen D E, Bang O, Królikowski W 2006 Phys. Rev. Lett. 96 043901Google Scholar

    [21]

    Lin Y Y, Lee R K, Malomed B A 2009 Phys. Rev. A 80 013838Google Scholar

    [22]

    Conti A, Peccianti M, Assanto G 2004 Phys. Rev. Lett. 92 113902Google Scholar

    [23]

    高星辉, 杨振军, 周罗红, 郑一周, 陆大全, 胡巍 2011 60 084213Google Scholar

    Gao X H, Yang Z J, Zhou L H, Zheng Y Z, Lu D Q, Hu W 2011 Acta Phys. Sin. 60 084213Google Scholar

    [24]

    Kong Q, Wei N, Fan C Z, Shi J L, Shen M 2017 Phys. Rep. 7 4198Google Scholar

    [25]

    Briedis D, Petersen D E, Edmundson D, Krolikowski W, Bang O 2005 Opt. Express 13 435Google Scholar

    [26]

    Rotschild C, Cohen O, Manela O, Segev M, Carmon T 2005 Phys. Rev. Lett. 95 2365

    [27]

    曹觉能, 郭旗 2005 54 3688Google Scholar

    Cao J N, Guo Q 2005 Acta Phys. Sin. 54 3688Google Scholar

    [28]

    Ye F, Kartashov Y, Hu B, Torner L 2010 Opt. Lett. 35 628Google Scholar

    [29]

    Sun C Z, Liang G 2019 Chin. Phys. B 28 074206Google Scholar

    [30]

    Ye F, Dong L, Hu B 2009 Opt. Lett. 34 584Google Scholar

    [31]

    Chen W, Wang Q, Shi J L, Shen M 2017 Opt. Commun. 403 22Google Scholar

    [32]

    郑一凡, 黄光侨, 林机 2018 67 214207Google Scholar

    Zheng Y F, Huang G Q, Lin J 2018 Acta Phys Sin. 67 214207Google Scholar

    [33]

    Wang Q, Deng Z Z 2020 Results Phys. 17 103056Google Scholar

    [34]

    Akhmediev N, Ankiewicz A 1993 Phys. Rev. Lett. 70 2395Google Scholar

    [35]

    Shi X L, Malomed B A, Ye F W, Chen X F 2012 Phys. Rev. A 85 053839Google Scholar

    [36]

    Dang Y L, Li H J, Lin J 2017 Nonlinear Dynam. 88 489Google Scholar

    [37]

    Islam M J, Atai J 2018 J. Mod. Opt. 65 1499980

    [38]

    Gao Z J, Dang Y L, Lin J 2018 Opt. Commun. 44 302

    [39]

    方乒乒, 金新伟, 林机 2019 光子学报 48 51Google Scholar

    Fang P P, Jin X W, Lin J 2019 Acta Photon. Sin. 48 51Google Scholar

    [40]

    Mahato D K, Govindarajan A, Sarma A K 2020 J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 37 3443Google Scholar

    [41]

    Kartashov Y V, Konotop V V, Malomed B A 2015 Opt. Lett. 40 004126Google Scholar

    [42]

    Safaei L, Zarandi M B, Hatami M 2018 Opt. Quantum Electron. 50 382Google Scholar

    [43]

    Zakery A, Hatami M 2007 J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 40 1010Google Scholar

    [44]

    Govindaraji A, Mahalingam A, Uthayakumar A 2015 Appl. Phys. B 120 341

    [45]

    Armaroli A, Trillo S, Fratalocchi A 2009 Phys. Rev. A 80 053803Google Scholar

    [46]

    高星辉, 张承云, 唐冬, 郑晖, 陆大全, 胡巍 2013 62 044214Google Scholar

    Gao X H, Zhang C Y, Tang D, Zheng H, Lu D Q, Hu W 2013 Acta Phys. Sin. 62 044214Google Scholar

  • 图 1  基态暗孤子数值解 (a)不同d对应的波形($ d $分别取2.0 (蓝线), 4.5 (红线)和7.5 (绿线)); (b)功率与传播常数的关系图; (c) $ b = -1 $, $ d = 2 $, $ \beta_{2} = -1 $时, 不同$ \beta_{1} $对应的波形($ \beta_{1} $分别取–2 (蓝线), –5 (红线)和–7 (绿线)); (d) $ d $ = 2时, 不同$ b $对应的波形($ b $分别取–0.2 (蓝线), –0.5 (红线)和–1.0 (绿线)); (e)不同耦合系数比值下, $ U_{1} $$ U_{2} $的幅值图

    Figure 1.  Numerical solution of the ground state dark soliton: (a) Waveform corresponds to different $ d $ ($ d $ selected as 2.0 (blue lines), 4.5 (red lines) and 7.5 (green lines), respectively); (b) the power versus the propagation constant; (c) waveform corresponds to different $ \beta_{1} $ when $ b $ = –1, $ d $ = 2, $\beta_{2} = -1$ ($ \beta_{1} $ selected as –2 (blue lines), –5 (red lines) and –7 (green lines), respectively); (d) waveform corresponds to different $ b $ ($ b $ selected as –0.2 (blue lines), –0.5 (red lines) and –1.0 (green lines), respectively); (e) amplitude diagram of $ U_{1} $ and $ U_{2} $ for different coupling coefficient ratios.

    图 2  基态暗孤子的传输特征及稳定性 (a)$ d $ = 2, $ b $ = –1时, $ U_{1} $的加噪传输图; (b)稳定性图谱

    Figure 2.  Propagation characteristics and stability of the ground state dark soliton: (a) Propagation of $ U_{1} $ with the white noise when $ d $ = 2 and $ b $ = –1; (b) stability profile

    图 3  偶极暗孤子的特性  (a) $ d $ = 1, $ b $ = –1时偶极暗孤子的强度分布图; (b) 线性稳定性区域图; (c) $ d $ = 4.2, $ b $ = –1.5时, $ U_{1} $传输图; (d) $ d $ = 1.5, $ b $ = –2时, $ U_{1} $传输图

    Figure 3.  Characteristics of the dipole dark soliton: (a) Intensity profiles of dipole dark soliton when $ d $ = 1 and $ b $ = –1; (b) linear stability region diagram; (c) transmission diagram of $ U_{1} $ when $ d $ = 4.2 and $ b $ = –1.5; (d) transmission diagram of $ U_{1} $ when $ d $ = 1.5 and $ b $ = –2

    图 4  不同类型的偶极暗孤子的强度分布和传播特性 (a)−(c)分别为$ d $ = 4, $ b $ = –1.5时, 偶极暗孤子的强度分布图、传输图和稳定性图谱; (d)−(f) 分别为$ b $ = –1.3, $ d $ = 1时, 偶极暗孤子的强度分布图、传输图和稳定性图谱; (g)和(h)分别为$ b $ = –1.7, $ d $ = 2时, 两个偶极暗孤子的强度分布和$ U_{1} $的传输图; (i) 和(j)分别为$ b $ = –1.4, $ d $ = 5时, 两个偶极暗孤子的强度分布和$ U_{1} $的传输图

    Figure 4.  Intensity profiles and propagating characteristics of different types of dipole dark soliton: (a)– (c) The intensity distribution diagram, the transmission diagram and the stability diagram of the dipole dark soliton when $ d $ = 4 and $ b $ = –1.5 respectively; (d)−(f) the intensity distribution diagram, the transmission diagram and the stability diagram of the dipole dark soliton when $ b $ = –1.3 and $ d $ = 1 respectively; (g) and (h) the intensity distribution of dipole-dipole dark solitons and the transmission diagram of $ U_{1} $ when $ b $ = –1.7 and $ d $ = 2, respectively; (i) and (j) the intensity distribution of dipole-dipole dark solitons and the transmission diagram of $ U_{1} $ when $ b $ = –1.4 and $ d $ = 5, respectively.

    图 5  不同类型的三极暗孤子的强度分布和传播特性 (a)和(b)分别为$ b $ = –4.45, $ d $ = 1时, 三极暗孤子的强度分布和$ U_{1} $传输图; (c)和(d)分别为$ b $ = –1.2, $ d $ = 1时, 三极暗孤子的强度分布和$ U_{1} $传输图

    Figure 5.  Intensity profiles and propagating characteristics of tripole dark soliton: (a) and (b) The intensity distribution of the tripole dark soliton and the transmission diagram of $ U_{1} $ when $ b $ = –4.45 and $ d $ = 1, respectively; (c) and (d) the intensity distribution of the tripole dark soliton and the transmission diagram of $ U_{1} $ when $ b $ = –1.2 and $ d $ = 1, respectively.

    Baidu
  • [1]

    Lederer F, Stegeman G I, Christodoulides D N, Assanto G, Segev M, Silberg Y 2008 Phys. Rep. 463 1Google Scholar

    [2]

    Wu Y D 2004 Fiber Integr. Opt. 23 405Google Scholar

    [3]

    Nistazakis H E, Frantzeskakis D J, Atai J, Malomed A B, Efremidis N, Hizanidis K 2002 Phys. Rev. E 65 036605Google Scholar

    [4]

    Malomed B A, Peng G D, Chu P L 1996 Opt. Lett. 21 330Google Scholar

    [5]

    Harel A, Malomed B A 2014 Phys. Rev. A 89 043809Google Scholar

    [6]

    Mak W C, Malomed B A, Chu P L 2004 Phys. Rev. E 69 279

    [7]

    Trillo S, Wabnitz S 1988 J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 5 483Google Scholar

    [8]

    Smirnova D A, Gorbach A V, Iorsh I V, Shadrivov I V, Kivshar Y S 2013 Phys. Rev. B 88 045443Google Scholar

    [9]

    Albuch L, Malomed B A 2007 Math. Comput. Simul. 74 312Google Scholar

    [10]

    黄光桥, 林机 2017 66 054208Google Scholar

    Huang G Q, Lin J 2017 Acta Phys. Sin. 66 054208Google Scholar

    [11]

    Gubeskys A, Malomed B A 2007 Phys. Rev. A 75 063602Google Scholar

    [12]

    Zhao X, Tian B, Qu Q X, Yuan Y Q, Du X X, Chu M X 2020 Mod. Phys. Lett. B 34 2050282

    [13]

    Stegeman G I, Assanto G, Zanoni R, Seaton C T, Garmire E, Maradudin A A, Reinisch R, Vitrant G 1988 Appl. Phys. Lett. 52 869Google Scholar

    [14]

    Krölikowski W, Bang O, Nikolov N I, Neshev D, Wyller J, Rasmussen J J, Edmundson D 2004 J. Opt. B: Quantum Semiclassical Opt. 6 S288Google Scholar

    [15]

    Conti C, Peccianti M, Assanto G 2003 Phys. Rev. Lett. 91 073902Google Scholar

    [16]

    Jia J, Lin J 2012 Opt. Express 20 7469Google Scholar

    [17]

    Liang G, Dang D L, Li W, Li H G, Guo Q 2020 New J. Phys. 22 073024Google Scholar

    [18]

    Chen M N, Ping X R, Liang G, Guo Q, Lu D Q, Hu W 2018 Phys. Rev. A 97 013829Google Scholar

    [19]

    Mitchell M, Segev M, Christodoulides D N 1998 Phys. Rev. Lett. 80 4657Google Scholar

    [20]

    Dreischuh A, Neshev D N, Petersen D E, Bang O, Królikowski W 2006 Phys. Rev. Lett. 96 043901Google Scholar

    [21]

    Lin Y Y, Lee R K, Malomed B A 2009 Phys. Rev. A 80 013838Google Scholar

    [22]

    Conti A, Peccianti M, Assanto G 2004 Phys. Rev. Lett. 92 113902Google Scholar

    [23]

    高星辉, 杨振军, 周罗红, 郑一周, 陆大全, 胡巍 2011 60 084213Google Scholar

    Gao X H, Yang Z J, Zhou L H, Zheng Y Z, Lu D Q, Hu W 2011 Acta Phys. Sin. 60 084213Google Scholar

    [24]

    Kong Q, Wei N, Fan C Z, Shi J L, Shen M 2017 Phys. Rep. 7 4198Google Scholar

    [25]

    Briedis D, Petersen D E, Edmundson D, Krolikowski W, Bang O 2005 Opt. Express 13 435Google Scholar

    [26]

    Rotschild C, Cohen O, Manela O, Segev M, Carmon T 2005 Phys. Rev. Lett. 95 2365

    [27]

    曹觉能, 郭旗 2005 54 3688Google Scholar

    Cao J N, Guo Q 2005 Acta Phys. Sin. 54 3688Google Scholar

    [28]

    Ye F, Kartashov Y, Hu B, Torner L 2010 Opt. Lett. 35 628Google Scholar

    [29]

    Sun C Z, Liang G 2019 Chin. Phys. B 28 074206Google Scholar

    [30]

    Ye F, Dong L, Hu B 2009 Opt. Lett. 34 584Google Scholar

    [31]

    Chen W, Wang Q, Shi J L, Shen M 2017 Opt. Commun. 403 22Google Scholar

    [32]

    郑一凡, 黄光侨, 林机 2018 67 214207Google Scholar

    Zheng Y F, Huang G Q, Lin J 2018 Acta Phys Sin. 67 214207Google Scholar

    [33]

    Wang Q, Deng Z Z 2020 Results Phys. 17 103056Google Scholar

    [34]

    Akhmediev N, Ankiewicz A 1993 Phys. Rev. Lett. 70 2395Google Scholar

    [35]

    Shi X L, Malomed B A, Ye F W, Chen X F 2012 Phys. Rev. A 85 053839Google Scholar

    [36]

    Dang Y L, Li H J, Lin J 2017 Nonlinear Dynam. 88 489Google Scholar

    [37]

    Islam M J, Atai J 2018 J. Mod. Opt. 65 1499980

    [38]

    Gao Z J, Dang Y L, Lin J 2018 Opt. Commun. 44 302

    [39]

    方乒乒, 金新伟, 林机 2019 光子学报 48 51Google Scholar

    Fang P P, Jin X W, Lin J 2019 Acta Photon. Sin. 48 51Google Scholar

    [40]

    Mahato D K, Govindarajan A, Sarma A K 2020 J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 37 3443Google Scholar

    [41]

    Kartashov Y V, Konotop V V, Malomed B A 2015 Opt. Lett. 40 004126Google Scholar

    [42]

    Safaei L, Zarandi M B, Hatami M 2018 Opt. Quantum Electron. 50 382Google Scholar

    [43]

    Zakery A, Hatami M 2007 J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 40 1010Google Scholar

    [44]

    Govindaraji A, Mahalingam A, Uthayakumar A 2015 Appl. Phys. B 120 341

    [45]

    Armaroli A, Trillo S, Fratalocchi A 2009 Phys. Rev. A 80 053803Google Scholar

    [46]

    高星辉, 张承云, 唐冬, 郑晖, 陆大全, 胡巍 2013 62 044214Google Scholar

    Gao X H, Zhang C Y, Tang D, Zheng H, Lu D Q, Hu W 2013 Acta Phys. Sin. 62 044214Google Scholar

  • [1] Pan Nan, Huang Ping, Huang Long-Gang, Lei Ming, Liu Wen-Jun. Study on transmission characteristics of dark solitons in inhomogeneous optical fibers. Acta Physica Sinica, 2015, 64(9): 090504. doi: 10.7498/aps.64.090504
    [2] Yong Wen-Mei, Chen Hai-Jun. Stability of dipolar soliton in crossed linear and nonlinear optical lattices. Acta Physica Sinica, 2014, 63(15): 150302. doi: 10.7498/aps.63.150302
    [3] Gao Xing-Hui, Tang Dong, Zhang Cheng-Yun, Zheng Hui, Lu Da-Quan, Hu Wei. Nonlocal surface dark solitons and their stability analysis. Acta Physica Sinica, 2014, 63(2): 024204. doi: 10.7498/aps.63.024204
    [4] Chen Hai-Jun, Li Xiang-Fu. The stability of matter-wave solitons in 2D linear and nonlinear optical lattices. Acta Physica Sinica, 2013, 62(7): 070302. doi: 10.7498/aps.62.070302
    [5] Zhao Can, Ma Xue-Kai, Wang Jing, Lu Da-Quan, Hu Wei. Impact of boundary on the surface soliton in (1+1)-dimensional nonlocal nonlinear media. Acta Physica Sinica, 2013, 62(9): 094213. doi: 10.7498/aps.62.094213
    [6] Gao Xing-Hui, Zhang Cheng-Yun, Tang Dong, Zheng Hui, Lu Da-Quan, Hu Wei. Nonlocal dark soliton and its linear stability analysis. Acta Physica Sinica, 2013, 62(4): 044214. doi: 10.7498/aps.62.044214
    [7] Peng Hu-Qing, Ma Xue-Kai, Lu Da-Quan, Hu Wei. Multiple-type solutions for multipole interface solitons in thermal nonlinear medium. Acta Physica Sinica, 2012, 61(18): 184211. doi: 10.7498/aps.61.184211
    [8] Cai Shan-Yong, Mei Lei, Peng Hu-Qing, Lu Da-Quan, Hu Wei. The analytical solution and stability of multipole surface soliton in nonlocal nonlinear medium. Acta Physica Sinica, 2012, 61(15): 154211. doi: 10.7498/aps.61.154211
    [9] Gao Xing-Hui, Yang Zhen-Jun, Zhou Luo-Hong, Zheng Yi-Zhou, Lu Da-Quan, Hu Wei. Influence of nonlocalization degree on the interaction between spatial dark solitons. Acta Physica Sinica, 2011, 60(8): 084213. doi: 10.7498/aps.60.084213
    [10] Zhou Luo-Hong, Gao Xing-Hui, Yang Zhen-Jun, Lu Da-Quan, Guo Qi, Cao Wei-Wen, Hu Wei. Experimental and theoretical investigations of spatial dark solitons in nonlocal nonlinear medium. Acta Physica Sinica, 2011, 60(4): 044208. doi: 10.7498/aps.60.044208
    [11] Liu Hao-Ran, Zhu Zhan-Long, Shi Pei-Ming. Stability analysis of a relative rotation time-delay nonlinear dynamic system. Acta Physica Sinica, 2010, 59(10): 6770-6777. doi: 10.7498/aps.59.6770
    [12] Liu Shuang, Liu Bin, Zhang Ye-Kuan, Wen Yan. Hopf bifurcation and stability of periodic solutions in a nonlinear relative rotation dynamical system with time delay. Acta Physica Sinica, 2010, 59(1): 38-43. doi: 10.7498/aps.59.38
    [13] Yang Zhen-Jun, Li Shao-Hua, Lu Da-Quan, Hu Wei. Variational analysis of dipole soliton in nonlocal nonlinear Kerr media. Acta Physica Sinica, 2010, 59(7): 4707-4714. doi: 10.7498/aps.59.4707
    [14] Shi Pei-Ming, Jiang Jin-Shui, Liu Bin. Stability and approximate solution of a relative-rotation nonlinear dynamical system with coupled terms. Acta Physica Sinica, 2009, 58(4): 2147-2154. doi: 10.7498/aps.58.2147
    [15] Shi Pei-Ming, Liu Bin, Liu Shuang. Stability and approximate solution of a relative-rotation nonlinear dynamical system under harmonic excitation. Acta Physica Sinica, 2008, 57(8): 4675-4684. doi: 10.7498/aps.57.4675
    [16] Liang Yan-Bin, Zheng Ya-Jian, Yang Ping-Bao, Cao Long-Gui, Lu Da-Quan, Hu Wei, Guo Qi. Investigation of propagation of spatial soliton in nonlocal nonlinear medium of finite-size. Acta Physica Sinica, 2008, 57(9): 5690-5698. doi: 10.7498/aps.57.5690
    [17] Meng Zong, Liu Bin. Stability of relativistic rotational nonlinear dynamic equation and solution for a kind of nonlinear elastic coefficients. Acta Physica Sinica, 2007, 56(11): 6194-6198. doi: 10.7498/aps.56.6194
    [18] Long Xue-Wen, Hu Wei, Zhang Tao, Guo Qi, Lan Sheng, Gao Xi-Cun. Theoretical investigation of propagation of nonlocal spatial soliton in nematic liquid crystals. Acta Physica Sinica, 2007, 56(3): 1397-1403. doi: 10.7498/aps.56.1397
    [19] Xie Li, Lei Yin-Zhao. Uniqueness and stability of solution to the linear transient eddy current electromagnetic field problem for determining solution. Acta Physica Sinica, 2006, 55(9): 4397-4406. doi: 10.7498/aps.55.4397
    [20] Ouyang Shi-Gen, Jiang De-Sheng, She Wei-Long. Stability of photovotaic spatial soliton with two-wavelength components. Acta Physica Sinica, 2004, 53(9): 3033-3041. doi: 10.7498/aps.53.3033
Metrics
  • Abstract views:  4134
  • PDF Downloads:  84
  • Cited By: 0
Publishing process
  • Received Date:  05 February 2021
  • Accepted Date:  15 April 2021
  • Available Online:  07 June 2021
  • Published Online:  20 September 2021

/

返回文章
返回
Baidu
map