-
Based on the high-throughput calculation method of molecular simulation, except the structures with zero surface area and less than zero adsorption capacity, four geometric descriptors (largest cavity diameter, specific surface area, pore volume and porosity), an energy descriptor (heat of adsorption), adsorption capacity, and adsorption selectivity coefficient of 199 zeolites are obtained. By studying the correlation between structural characteristics and adsorption separation performance, the result shows that when the largest cavity diameter is 6 Å, the surface area is 1400–2100 m2·g–1, and the pore volume is in a range of 0.2–0.3 cm3·g–1, the zeolite has the greatest influence on the adsorption capacity and adsorption selectivity for methane molecules. At the same time, it is found that the largest cavity diameter and porosity of zeolite molecular sieves have a positive correlation, and there is also an obvious linear relationship between the CH4 adsorption selectivity coefficient of the equimolar CH4/H2 mixed component and the single-component CH4 adsorption capacity. By using the grand canonical Monte Carlo simulation method, physical quantities such as adsorption isotherms and isosteric heats of adsorption for CH4 and H2 of three channel-shaped zeolites are obtained. The result shows that the pore structure (surface area and pore volume) of the channel-shaped zeolite has a greater influence on the CH4 adsorption capacity than the energy effect (heat of adsorption), under the same external environment. Combining with the industrial background of steam methane reforming hydrogen production, the separation and selectivity performance of the CH4/H2 mixed system under different components are further studied. The result reveals that there is no correlation between adsorption selectivity of ultra-microporous zeolite material for CH4 and bulk pressure or feed ratio. According to the centroid distribution density of gas molecules, it is found that CH4 preferentially occupies the space of smaller pore windows in the channel-shaped zeolite, while the distribution range of H2 is larger but there is no unambiguous preferential adsorption site.
-
Keywords:
- zeolite molecular sieve /
- high-throughput computing /
- grand canonical Monte Carlo simulation /
- adsorption separation
[1] Nijem N, Veyan J F, Kong L Z, Li K, Pramanik S, Zhao Y, Li J, Langreth D, Chabal Y J 2010 J. Am. Chem. Soc. 132 1654
Google Scholar
[2] Liu X B, Li W X, Zhao X D, Fan L Z 2019 Adv. Funct. Mater. 29 1901510
Google Scholar
[3] 陈玉红, 刘婷婷, 张梅玲, 元丽华, 张材荣 2017 化学学报 75 708
Google Scholar
Chen Y H, Liu T T, Zhang M L, Yuan L H, Zhang C R 2017 Acta Chim. Sin. 75 708
Google Scholar
[4] 刘秀英, 王朝阳, 唐永建, 孙卫国, 吴卫东, 张厚琼, 刘淼, 袁磊, 徐嘉靖 2009 58 1126
Google Scholar
Liu X Y, Wang C Y, Tang Y J, Sun W G, Wu W D, Zhang H Q, Liu M, Yuan L, Xu J J 2009 Acta Phys. Sin. 58 1126
Google Scholar
[5] Chen J J, Gao X H, Yan L F, Xu D G 2018 Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 43 12948
Google Scholar
[6] LeValley T L, Richard A R, Fan M H 2014 Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 39 16983
Google Scholar
[7] Yang Q Y, Wiersum A D, Jobic H, Guillerm V, Serre C, Llewellyn P L, Maurin G 2011 J. Phys. Chem. C 115 13768
Google Scholar
[8] Bastos-Neto M, Patzschke C, Lange M, Guillerm V, Serre C, Llewellyn P L, Maurin G 2012 Energy Environ. Sci. 5 8294
Google Scholar
[9] Zhou D, Cheng Q Y, Cui Y, Wang T, Li X X, Han B H 2014 Carbon 66 592
Google Scholar
[10] 吴选军, 郑佶, 李江, 蔡卫权 2013 物理化学学报 29 2207
Google Scholar
Wu X J, Zheng J, Li J, Cai W Q 2013 Acta Phys.-Chim. Sin. 29 2207
Google Scholar
[11] Chue K T, Kim J N, Yoo Y J, Cho S H, Yang R T 1995 Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 34 591
Google Scholar
[12] Ho M T, Allinson G W, Wiley D E 2008 Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 47 1562
Google Scholar
[13] Li Y, Yu J H 2014 Chem. Rev. 114 7268
Google Scholar
[14] Li J Y, Corma A, Yu J H 2015 Chem. Soc. Rev. 44 7112
Google Scholar
[15] Weckhuysen B M, Yu J H 2015 Chem. Soc. Rev. 44 7022
Google Scholar
[16] Ferri P, Li C G, Paris C, Vidal-Moya A, Moliner M, Boronat M, Corma A 2019 ACS Catal. 9 11542
Google Scholar
[17] Margarit V J, Osman M, Al-Khattaf S, Martínez C, Boronat M, Corma A 2019 ACS Catal. 9 5935
Google Scholar
[18] McCusker L B, Liebau F, Engelhardt G 2001 Pure Appl. Chem. 73 381
Google Scholar
[19] Li Y, Cao H, Yu J H 2018 ACS Nano 12 4096
Google Scholar
[20] Stückenschneider K, Merz J, Schembecker G 2013 J. Mol. Model. 19 5611
Google Scholar
[21] Fu H, Wang Y J, Zhang T H, Yang C H, Shan H H 2017 J. Phys. Chem. C 121 25818
Google Scholar
[22] Perez-Carbajo J, Gómez-Álvarez P, Bueno-Perez R, Merkling P J, Calero S 2014 Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 16 5678
Google Scholar
[23] 刘秀英, 李晓凤, 张丽英, 樊志琴, 马兴科 2012 61 146802
Google Scholar
Liu X Y, Li X F, Zhang L Y, Fan Z Q, Ma X K 2012 Acta Phys. Sin. 61 146802
Google Scholar
[24] Curtarolo S, Hart G L W, Nardelli M B, Mingo N, Sanvito S, Levy O 2013 Nat. Mater. 12 191
Google Scholar
[25] 刘治鲁, 李炜, 刘昊, 庄旭东, 李松 2019 化学学报 77 323
Google Scholar
Liu Z L, Li W, Liu H, Zhuang X D, Li S 2019 Acta Chim. Sin. 77 323
Google Scholar
[26] Wollmann P, Leistner M, Stoeck U, Grünker R, Gedrich K, Klein N, Throl O, Grählert W, Senkovska I, Dreisbach F, Kaskel S 2011 Chem. Commun. 47 5151
Google Scholar
[27] Database of Zeolite Structures http://www.iza-structure.org/databases/
[28] Martin R L, Smit B, Haranczyk M 2012 J. Chem. Inf. Model. 52 308
Google Scholar
[29] Pinheiro M, Martin R L, Rycroft C H, Jones A, Iglesia E, Haranczyk M 2013 J. Mol. Graphics Modell. 44 208
Google Scholar
[30] Bai P, Tsapatsis M, Siepmann J I 2013 J. Phys. Chem. C 117 24375
Google Scholar
[31] Goodbody S J, Watanabe K, MacGowan D, Walton J P R B, Quirke N 1991 Faraday Trans. 87 1951
Google Scholar
[32] Levesque D, Gicquel A, Darkrim F L, Kayiran S B 2002 J. Phys. Condens. Matter 14 9285
Google Scholar
[33] Peng X, Cheng X, Cao D P 2011 J. Mater. Chem. 21 11259
Google Scholar
[34] Dubbeldam D, Torres-Knoop A, Walton K S 2013 Mol. Simulat. 39 1253
Google Scholar
[35] Dubbeldam D, Snurr R Q 2007 Mol. Simul. 33 305
Google Scholar
[36] Bao Z B, Alnemrat S, Yu L, Vasiliev I, Ren Q L, Lu X Y, Deng S G 2011 Langmuir 27 13554
Google Scholar
-
图 1 高通量计算流程
Figure 1. High-throughput calculation process.
图 2 ASV, BOF和FER的孔道结构
Figure 2. Channel structure of ASV, BOF and FER.
图 3 沸石材料中吸附性能与孔结构之间的关联性
Figure 3. Correlation between adsorption performance and pore structure in zeolite materials.
图 4 沸石材料中分离性能与孔结构之间的关联性
Figure 4. Correlation between separation performance and pore structure in zeolite materials.
图 5 (a) LCD, porosity和POAV之间的关联性; (b), (c) 甲烷吸附量、吸附热和甲烷/氢气吸附选择性之间的关联性
Figure 5. (a) Relationship between LCD, porosity and POAV; (b), (c) the correlation between CH4 adsorption capacity, adsorption heat and CH4/H2 adsorption selectivity.
图 6 沸石对CH4 (a) 和H2 (b) 的吸附量
Figure 6. Adsorption capacity of zeolite for CH4 (a) and H2 (b)
图 7 沸石中CH4 (a) 和H2 (b) 的等量吸附热
Figure 7. Isosteric heat of adsorption of CH4 (a) and H2 (b) in zeolite.
图 8 压力对三种气体组份的CH4选择性的影响 (a) y CH4/yH2 = 0.05∶0.95; (b) y CH4/yH2 = 0.5∶0.5; (c) y CH4/yH2 = 0.95∶0.05
Figure 8. Influence of pressure on CH4 selectivity for three gas compositions: (a) y CH4/yH2 = 0.05∶0.95; (b) y CH4/yH2 = 0.5∶0.5, (c) y CH4/yH2 = 0.95∶0.05.
图 9 CH4在ASV, BOF和FER沿孔径方向(a), (b), (c) 和垂直于孔径方向 (d), (e), (f) 的质心密度分布
Figure 9. Centroid density distribution of CH4 in ASV, BOF and FER along the aperture direction (a), (b), (c) and perpendicular to the aperture direction (d), (e), (f).
图 10 H2在ASV, BOF和FER沿孔径方向(a), (b), (c) 和垂直于孔径方向 (d), (e), (f) 的质心密度分布
Figure 10. Centroid density distribution of H2 in ASV, BOF and FER along the aperture direction (a), (b), (c) and perpendicular to the aperture direction (d), (e), (f).
表 1 沸石的结构参数
Table 1. Structural parameters of zeolite.
Zeolite Unit cell/Å Cell angle/(°) PLD/Å ASA/(m2·g–1) POAV/(cm3·g–1) ASV a = b = 8.674, c = 13.919 α = β = γ = 90 4.0279 1323.9 0.1923 BOF a = 7.503, b = 12.773, c = 13.706 α = β = γ = 90 4.1832 1408.0 0.2207 FER a = 19.018, b = 14.303, c = 7.541 α = β = γ = 90 4.2893 1545.5 0.2375 
DownLoad: CSV
表 2 吸附质分子和沸石的力场参数
Table 2. Force field parameters of adsorbate molecules and zeolites.
原子 (ε/kB)/K σ/Å q/e CH4 148.0 3.73 0 H2 H 36.7 2.958 0.468 com 0 0 –0.936 Zeolite Si 22 2.3 1.5 O 53 3.3 –0.75
DownLoad: CSV
-
[1] Nijem N, Veyan J F, Kong L Z, Li K, Pramanik S, Zhao Y, Li J, Langreth D, Chabal Y J 2010 J. Am. Chem. Soc. 132 1654
Google Scholar
[2] Liu X B, Li W X, Zhao X D, Fan L Z 2019 Adv. Funct. Mater. 29 1901510
Google Scholar
[3] 陈玉红, 刘婷婷, 张梅玲, 元丽华, 张材荣 2017 化学学报 75 708
Google Scholar
Chen Y H, Liu T T, Zhang M L, Yuan L H, Zhang C R 2017 Acta Chim. Sin. 75 708
Google Scholar
[4] 刘秀英, 王朝阳, 唐永建, 孙卫国, 吴卫东, 张厚琼, 刘淼, 袁磊, 徐嘉靖 2009 58 1126
Google Scholar
Liu X Y, Wang C Y, Tang Y J, Sun W G, Wu W D, Zhang H Q, Liu M, Yuan L, Xu J J 2009 Acta Phys. Sin. 58 1126
Google Scholar
[5] Chen J J, Gao X H, Yan L F, Xu D G 2018 Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 43 12948
Google Scholar
[6] LeValley T L, Richard A R, Fan M H 2014 Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 39 16983
Google Scholar
[7] Yang Q Y, Wiersum A D, Jobic H, Guillerm V, Serre C, Llewellyn P L, Maurin G 2011 J. Phys. Chem. C 115 13768
Google Scholar
[8] Bastos-Neto M, Patzschke C, Lange M, Guillerm V, Serre C, Llewellyn P L, Maurin G 2012 Energy Environ. Sci. 5 8294
Google Scholar
[9] Zhou D, Cheng Q Y, Cui Y, Wang T, Li X X, Han B H 2014 Carbon 66 592
Google Scholar
[10] 吴选军, 郑佶, 李江, 蔡卫权 2013 物理化学学报 29 2207
Google Scholar
Wu X J, Zheng J, Li J, Cai W Q 2013 Acta Phys.-Chim. Sin. 29 2207
Google Scholar
[11] Chue K T, Kim J N, Yoo Y J, Cho S H, Yang R T 1995 Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 34 591
Google Scholar
[12] Ho M T, Allinson G W, Wiley D E 2008 Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 47 1562
Google Scholar
[13] Li Y, Yu J H 2014 Chem. Rev. 114 7268
Google Scholar
[14] Li J Y, Corma A, Yu J H 2015 Chem. Soc. Rev. 44 7112
Google Scholar
[15] Weckhuysen B M, Yu J H 2015 Chem. Soc. Rev. 44 7022
Google Scholar
[16] Ferri P, Li C G, Paris C, Vidal-Moya A, Moliner M, Boronat M, Corma A 2019 ACS Catal. 9 11542
Google Scholar
[17] Margarit V J, Osman M, Al-Khattaf S, Martínez C, Boronat M, Corma A 2019 ACS Catal. 9 5935
Google Scholar
[18] McCusker L B, Liebau F, Engelhardt G 2001 Pure Appl. Chem. 73 381
Google Scholar
[19] Li Y, Cao H, Yu J H 2018 ACS Nano 12 4096
Google Scholar
[20] Stückenschneider K, Merz J, Schembecker G 2013 J. Mol. Model. 19 5611
Google Scholar
[21] Fu H, Wang Y J, Zhang T H, Yang C H, Shan H H 2017 J. Phys. Chem. C 121 25818
Google Scholar
[22] Perez-Carbajo J, Gómez-Álvarez P, Bueno-Perez R, Merkling P J, Calero S 2014 Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 16 5678
Google Scholar
[23] 刘秀英, 李晓凤, 张丽英, 樊志琴, 马兴科 2012 61 146802
Google Scholar
Liu X Y, Li X F, Zhang L Y, Fan Z Q, Ma X K 2012 Acta Phys. Sin. 61 146802
Google Scholar
[24] Curtarolo S, Hart G L W, Nardelli M B, Mingo N, Sanvito S, Levy O 2013 Nat. Mater. 12 191
Google Scholar
[25] 刘治鲁, 李炜, 刘昊, 庄旭东, 李松 2019 化学学报 77 323
Google Scholar
Liu Z L, Li W, Liu H, Zhuang X D, Li S 2019 Acta Chim. Sin. 77 323
Google Scholar
[26] Wollmann P, Leistner M, Stoeck U, Grünker R, Gedrich K, Klein N, Throl O, Grählert W, Senkovska I, Dreisbach F, Kaskel S 2011 Chem. Commun. 47 5151
Google Scholar
[27] Database of Zeolite Structures http://www.iza-structure.org/databases/
[28] Martin R L, Smit B, Haranczyk M 2012 J. Chem. Inf. Model. 52 308
Google Scholar
[29] Pinheiro M, Martin R L, Rycroft C H, Jones A, Iglesia E, Haranczyk M 2013 J. Mol. Graphics Modell. 44 208
Google Scholar
[30] Bai P, Tsapatsis M, Siepmann J I 2013 J. Phys. Chem. C 117 24375
Google Scholar
[31] Goodbody S J, Watanabe K, MacGowan D, Walton J P R B, Quirke N 1991 Faraday Trans. 87 1951
Google Scholar
[32] Levesque D, Gicquel A, Darkrim F L, Kayiran S B 2002 J. Phys. Condens. Matter 14 9285
Google Scholar
[33] Peng X, Cheng X, Cao D P 2011 J. Mater. Chem. 21 11259
Google Scholar
[34] Dubbeldam D, Torres-Knoop A, Walton K S 2013 Mol. Simulat. 39 1253
Google Scholar
[35] Dubbeldam D, Snurr R Q 2007 Mol. Simul. 33 305
Google Scholar
[36] Bao Z B, Alnemrat S, Yu L, Vasiliev I, Ren Q L, Lu X Y, Deng S G 2011 Langmuir 27 13554
Google Scholar
DownLoad:
Catalog
Metrics
- Abstract views: 5800
- PDF Downloads: 108
- Cited By: 0
