-
The conventional phase retrieval wavefront sensing approaches mainly refer to a series of iterative algorithms, such as G-S algorithms, Y-G algorithms and error reduction algorithms. These methods use intensity information to calculate the wavefront phase. However, most of the traditional phase retrieval algorithms are difficult to meet the real-time requirements and depend on the iteration initial value used in iterative transformation or iterative optimization to some extent, so their practicalities are limited. To solve these problems, in this paper, a phase-diversity phase retrieval wavefront sensing method based on wavelet transform image fusion and convolutional neural network is proposed. Specifically, the image fusion method based on wavelet transform is used to fuse the point spread functions at the in-focus and defocus image planes, thereby simplifying the network inputs without losing the image information. The convolutional neural network (CNN) can directly extract image features and fit the required nonlinear mapping. In this paper, the CNN is utilized to establish the nonlinear mapping between the fusion images and wavefront distortions (represented by Zernike polynomials), that is, the fusion images are taken as the input data, and the corresponding Zernike coefficients as the output data. The network structure of the training in this paper has 22 layers, they are 1 input layer, 13 convolution layers, 6 pooling layers, 1 flatten layer and 1 full connection layer, that is, the output layer. The size of the convolution kernel is 3 × 3 and the step size is 1. The pooling method selects the maximum pooling and the size of the pooling kernel is 2 × 2. The activation function is ReLU, the optimization function is Adam, the loss function is the MSE, and the learning rate is 0.0001. The number of training data is 10000, which is divided into three parts: training set, validation set, and test set, accounting for 80%, 15% and 5% respectively. Trained CNN can directly output the Zernike coefficients of order 4–9 to a high precision, with these fusion images serving as the input, which is more in line with the real-time requirements. Abundant simulation experiments prove that the wavefront sensing precision is root-mean-square(RMS) 0.015λ, when the dynamic range of the wavefront is the aberration of low spatial frequency within 1.1λ of RMS value (i.e. the dynamic range of Zernike coefficients of order 4–9 is
$[- 0.5\lambda \,, \, 0.5\lambda]$ ). In practical application, according to the system aberration characteristics, the number of network output layer units can be changed and the network structure can be adjusted based on the method presented in this paper, thereby training the new network suitable for higher order aberration to realize high-precision wavefront sensing. It is also proved that the proposed method has certain robustness against noise, and when the relative defocus error is within 7.5%, the wavefront sensor accuracy is acceptable. With the improvement of image resolution, the wavefront sensing accuracy is improved, but the number of input data of the network also increases with the sampling rate increasing, and the time cost of network training increases accordingly.-
Keywords:
- phase retrieval /
- convolutional neural network /
- image fusion /
- sensing accuracy
[1] Roddier C, Roddier F 1993 Appl. Opt. 32 2992
Google Scholar
[2] 类维政, 袁吕军, 苏志德, 康燕, 武中华 2020 光学学报 40 1312003-1
Google Scholar
Lei W Z, Yuan L J, Su Z D, Kang Y, Wu Z H 2020 Acta Optica Sin. 40 1312003-1
Google Scholar
[3] 逯力红, 张伟 2010 应用光学 31 685
Google Scholar
Lu L H, Zhang W 2010 J. Appl. Opt. 31 685
Google Scholar
[4] 吴宇列, 胡晓军, 戴一帆, 李圣怡 2009 机械工程学报 45 157
Google Scholar
Wu Y L, Hu X J, Dai Y F, Li S Y 2009 Chin. J. Mech. Eng. 45 157
Google Scholar
[5] Gerehberg R W, Saxton W O 1972 Optik 35 237
Google Scholar
[6] Fienup J R 1982 Appl. Opt. 21 2758
Google Scholar
[7] 杨国桢, 顾本源 1981 30 410
Google Scholar
Yang G Z, Gu B Y 1981 Acta Phys. Sin. 30 410
Google Scholar
[8] Paine S W, Fienup J R 2018 Opt. Lett. 43 1235
Google Scholar
[9] Nishizaki Y, Valdivia M, Horisaki R, Kitaguchi K, Saito M, Tanida J, Vera E 2019 Opt. Express 27 240
Google Scholar
[10] Andersen T, Owner-Petersen M, Enmark A 2019 Opt. Lett. 44 4618
Google Scholar
[11] Ju G H, Qi X, Ma H G, Yan C X 2018 Opt. Express 26 31767
Google Scholar
[12] Qi X, Ju G H, Zhang C Y, Xu S Y 2019 Opt. Express 27 26102
Google Scholar
[13] 毛珩 2008 博士学位论文 (北京: 北京理工大学)
Mao H 2008 Ph. D. Dissertation (Beijing: Beijing Insitute of Technology) (in Chinese)
[14] 王欣 2010 博士学位论文 (北京: 北京理工大学)
Wang X 2010 Ph. D. Dissertation (Beijing: Beijing Insitute of Technology) (in Chinese)
[15] 柏财通, 高志强, 李爱, 崔翛龙 2020 计算机工程
Google Scholar
Bai C T, Gao Z Q, Li A, Cui X L 2020 Comput. Eng.
Google Scholar
[16] 李彦冬, 郝宗波, 雷航 2016 计算机应用 36 2508
Google Scholar
Li Y D, Hao Z B, Lei H 2016 J. Comput. Appl. 36 2508
Google Scholar
[17] 徐启伟, 王佩佩, 曾镇佳, 黄泽斌, 周新星, 刘俊敏, 李瑛, 陈书青, 范滇元 2020 69 014209
Google Scholar
Xu Q W, Wang P P, Zeng Z J, Huang Z B, Zhou X X, Liu J M, Li Y, Chen S Q, Fan D Y 2020 Acta Phys. Sin. 69 014209
Google Scholar
[18] 单宝忠, 王淑岩, 牛憨笨, 刘颂豪 2002 光学精密工程 10 318
Google Scholar
Shan B Z, Wang S Y, Niu H B, Liu S H 2002 Opt. Precis. Eng. 10 318
Google Scholar
[19] 王晨阳, 段倩倩, 周凯, 姚静, 苏敏, 傅意超, 纪俊羊, 洪鑫, 刘雪芹, 汪志勇 2020 69 100701
Google Scholar
Wang C Y, Duan Q Q, Zhou K, Yao J, Su M, Fu Y C, Ji J Y, Hong X, Liu X Q, Wang Z Y 2020 Acta Phys. Sin. 69 100701
Google Scholar
[20] Kingma D P, Ba J 2014 Comput. Sci. 1412 6982
[21] 闫胜武 2012 硕士学位论文 (兰州: 兰州大学)
Yan S W 2012 M. S. Thesis (Lanzhou: Lanzhou University) (in Chinese)
[22] 孙爱华 2014 硕士学位论文 (青岛: 中国海洋大学)
Sun A H 2014 M. S. Thesis (Qingdao: Ocean University of China) (in Chinese)
[23] 蔡植善, 陈木生 2015 激光与光电子学进展 52 117
Google Scholar
Cai Z S, Chen M S 2015 Las. Optoelect. Prog. 52 117
Google Scholar
[24] 赵辽英, 马启良, 厉小润 2012 61 194204
Google Scholar
Zhao L Y, Ma Q L, Li X R 2012 Acta Phys. Sin. 61 194204
Google Scholar
[25] 於时才, 吕艳琼 2009 计算机应用研究 26 390
Google Scholar
Yu S C, Lv Y Q 2009 Appl. Res. Comput. 26 390
Google Scholar
-
图 1 离焦型PDPR法工作原理图
Figure 1. Schematic diagram of PDPR (defocus diversity).
图 2 CNN结构示意图
Figure 2. The schematic of CNN structure.
图 3 基于小波变换机理的图像融合原理
Figure 3. Principle of image fusion based on wavelet transform.
图 4 融合图像示意图 (a) 焦面PSF图像; (b) 离焦面PSF图像; (c) 融合图像; (d) CNN的输入图像(即图(c)中红框内部分)
Figure 4. Schematic diagram of fusion image: (a) PSF image of the focal plane; (b) PSF image of the defocal plane; (c) the fusion image; (d) the input image of CNN.
图 5 10000组随机波前RMS分布图
Figure 5. RMS distributions of 10000 random wavefront groups.
图 6 真实系数与网络预测系数间的标准差统计直方图
Figure 6. Statistical histogram of standard deviation between the real coefficient and the network prediction coefficient.
图 7 测试数据波前传感精度RMS统计直方图
Figure 7. RMS statistical histogram of wavefront sensing accuracy of test data.
图 8 采用不同分辨率图像训练网络时, 波前传感精度RMS统计直方图对比 (a) 图像采样率 64 × 64; (b) 图像采样率128 × 128
Figure 8. When image training networks with different resolutions are adopted, the RMS statistical histogram of wavefront sensing precision are compared: (a) Image sampling rate 64 × 64; (b) image sampling rate 128 × 128
表 1 仿真系统参数
Table 1. Simulation system parameters.
透镜焦距/mm 入瞳直径/mm 波长/nm 离焦距离/mm 150 10 632.8 4 
DownLoad: CSV
表 2 系统存在不同阶像差时本文方法的波前传感精度
Table 2. The wavefront sensing accuracy of the proposed method when the system has different order of aberration.
像差阶数 4—7阶 4—8阶 4—10阶 4—11阶 传感精度RMS/$\lambda $ 0.010 0.012 0.015 0.100
DownLoad: CSV
表 3 不同离焦量误差下, 本文方法的传感精度
Table 3. The sensing accuracy of the proposed method under different defocusing errors.
相对离焦量误差/% 2.5 5.0 7.5 10.0 传感精度RMS/$\lambda $ 0.022 0.035 0.050 0.065
DownLoad: CSV
表 4 噪声对传感精度的影响
Table 4. The influence of noise on the sensing accuracy.
信噪比/dB 50 40 35 30 25 传感精度RMS/$\lambda $ 0.015 0.015 0.015 0.020 0.060
DownLoad: CSV
-
[1] Roddier C, Roddier F 1993 Appl. Opt. 32 2992
Google Scholar
[2] 类维政, 袁吕军, 苏志德, 康燕, 武中华 2020 光学学报 40 1312003-1
Google Scholar
Lei W Z, Yuan L J, Su Z D, Kang Y, Wu Z H 2020 Acta Optica Sin. 40 1312003-1
Google Scholar
[3] 逯力红, 张伟 2010 应用光学 31 685
Google Scholar
Lu L H, Zhang W 2010 J. Appl. Opt. 31 685
Google Scholar
[4] 吴宇列, 胡晓军, 戴一帆, 李圣怡 2009 机械工程学报 45 157
Google Scholar
Wu Y L, Hu X J, Dai Y F, Li S Y 2009 Chin. J. Mech. Eng. 45 157
Google Scholar
[5] Gerehberg R W, Saxton W O 1972 Optik 35 237
Google Scholar
[6] Fienup J R 1982 Appl. Opt. 21 2758
Google Scholar
[7] 杨国桢, 顾本源 1981 30 410
Google Scholar
Yang G Z, Gu B Y 1981 Acta Phys. Sin. 30 410
Google Scholar
[8] Paine S W, Fienup J R 2018 Opt. Lett. 43 1235
Google Scholar
[9] Nishizaki Y, Valdivia M, Horisaki R, Kitaguchi K, Saito M, Tanida J, Vera E 2019 Opt. Express 27 240
Google Scholar
[10] Andersen T, Owner-Petersen M, Enmark A 2019 Opt. Lett. 44 4618
Google Scholar
[11] Ju G H, Qi X, Ma H G, Yan C X 2018 Opt. Express 26 31767
Google Scholar
[12] Qi X, Ju G H, Zhang C Y, Xu S Y 2019 Opt. Express 27 26102
Google Scholar
[13] 毛珩 2008 博士学位论文 (北京: 北京理工大学)
Mao H 2008 Ph. D. Dissertation (Beijing: Beijing Insitute of Technology) (in Chinese)
[14] 王欣 2010 博士学位论文 (北京: 北京理工大学)
Wang X 2010 Ph. D. Dissertation (Beijing: Beijing Insitute of Technology) (in Chinese)
[15] 柏财通, 高志强, 李爱, 崔翛龙 2020 计算机工程
Google Scholar
Bai C T, Gao Z Q, Li A, Cui X L 2020 Comput. Eng.
Google Scholar
[16] 李彦冬, 郝宗波, 雷航 2016 计算机应用 36 2508
Google Scholar
Li Y D, Hao Z B, Lei H 2016 J. Comput. Appl. 36 2508
Google Scholar
[17] 徐启伟, 王佩佩, 曾镇佳, 黄泽斌, 周新星, 刘俊敏, 李瑛, 陈书青, 范滇元 2020 69 014209
Google Scholar
Xu Q W, Wang P P, Zeng Z J, Huang Z B, Zhou X X, Liu J M, Li Y, Chen S Q, Fan D Y 2020 Acta Phys. Sin. 69 014209
Google Scholar
[18] 单宝忠, 王淑岩, 牛憨笨, 刘颂豪 2002 光学精密工程 10 318
Google Scholar
Shan B Z, Wang S Y, Niu H B, Liu S H 2002 Opt. Precis. Eng. 10 318
Google Scholar
[19] 王晨阳, 段倩倩, 周凯, 姚静, 苏敏, 傅意超, 纪俊羊, 洪鑫, 刘雪芹, 汪志勇 2020 69 100701
Google Scholar
Wang C Y, Duan Q Q, Zhou K, Yao J, Su M, Fu Y C, Ji J Y, Hong X, Liu X Q, Wang Z Y 2020 Acta Phys. Sin. 69 100701
Google Scholar
[20] Kingma D P, Ba J 2014 Comput. Sci. 1412 6982
[21] 闫胜武 2012 硕士学位论文 (兰州: 兰州大学)
Yan S W 2012 M. S. Thesis (Lanzhou: Lanzhou University) (in Chinese)
[22] 孙爱华 2014 硕士学位论文 (青岛: 中国海洋大学)
Sun A H 2014 M. S. Thesis (Qingdao: Ocean University of China) (in Chinese)
[23] 蔡植善, 陈木生 2015 激光与光电子学进展 52 117
Google Scholar
Cai Z S, Chen M S 2015 Las. Optoelect. Prog. 52 117
Google Scholar
[24] 赵辽英, 马启良, 厉小润 2012 61 194204
Google Scholar
Zhao L Y, Ma Q L, Li X R 2012 Acta Phys. Sin. 61 194204
Google Scholar
[25] 於时才, 吕艳琼 2009 计算机应用研究 26 390
Google Scholar
Yu S C, Lv Y Q 2009 Appl. Res. Comput. 26 390
Google Scholar
DownLoad:
Catalog
Metrics
- Abstract views: 8222
- PDF Downloads: 204
- Cited By: 0
