-
The dynamics of RDX single crystal under ramp wave loading is studied experimentally and numerically. The ramp wave loading experiments on RDX single crystal in the orientation of (210) and (100) within 15 GPa are carried out with the magnetic driven device CQ-4, which can provide a loading pressure waveform with a rising time of 450–600 ns. The particle velocity curves of the interface between RDX single crystal and LiF window are obtained with the photonic Doppler velocimetry (PDV). The velocity profiles show an obvious three-wave structure, indicating that the RDX undergoes physical processes such as elastic-plastic transition and α-to-γ phase transition in the loading section. The stress yield limits of different crystallographic orientations of RDX single crystal show obvious difference. The onset phase transition pressures in two crystallographic orientations are the same, which is between 3.5 GPa and 4.0 GPa. The pressure range of phase transition is between initial phase transition pressure and 5 GPa. The γ phase is stable from 5 GPa to 15 GPa. The Hayes multi-phase equation of state and non-equilibrium phase transition kinetic model are employed to simulate the experimental process, and the numerical results can well describe the experimental physical processes such as elastoplastic transformation and phase transformation in the loading section. The calculated results reveal that the correction of the bulk modulus with pressure is necessary under ramp wave compression.
[1] Hall C A, Asay J R, Knudson M D, Stygar W A, Spielman R B, Pointon T D 2001 Rev. Sci. Instrum. 72 3587Google Scholar
[2] Hare D E, Forbes J W, Reisman D B 2004 Appl. Phys. Lett. 85 949Google Scholar
[3] Hare D E, Reisman D B, Garcia F, Green L G, Forbes J W, Furnish M D, Hall C, Hickman J W 2004 AIP Conference Proceedings 706 145Google Scholar
[4] Hare D E, Reisman D B, Dick J J 2004 UCRL-JRNL-202601
[5] Baer M R, Root S, Dattelbaum D Hooks D E, Gustavsen R L, Orler B, Pierce T, Garcia F, Vandersall K, DeFisher S, Travers B 2009 AIP Conference Proceedings 706 699
[6] Baer M R, Hall C A, Gustavsen R L 2007 J. Appl. Phys. 101 034906Google Scholar
[7] Ricardo I C, Leonardo C P, Samuel P H 2010 J. Mol. Struct. 970 51Google Scholar
[8] Dreger Z A, Gupta Y M 2007 J. Phys. Chem. B. 111 3893Google Scholar
[9] Goto N, Fujihisa H, Yamawaki H, Wakabayashi K, Nakayama Y, Yoshida M, Koshi M 2006 J. Phys. Chem. B. 110 23655Google Scholar
[10] Patterson J E, Dreger Z A, Gupta Y M 2007 J. Phys. Chem. B 111 10897Google Scholar
[11] Cawkwell M J, Ramos K J, Hooks D E, Sewell T D 2010 J. Appl. Phys. 107 063512Google Scholar
[12] Ramos K J, Hooks D E, Sewell T D, Cawkwell M J 2010 J. Appl. Phys. 108 066105Google Scholar
[13] Cawkwell M J, Sewell T D, Zheng L, Thompson D L 2008 Phys. Rev. B. 78 014107Google Scholar
[14] Hooks D E, Ramos K J, Martinez A R 2006 J. Appl. Phys. 100 024908Google Scholar
[15] Wang G J, Luo B Q, Zhang X P, Zhao J H, Sun C W, Tan F L, Chong T, Mo J J, Wu G, TaO Y H 2013 Rev. Sci. Instrum. 84 015117Google Scholar
[16] 罗斌强, 张红平, 种涛, 王桂吉, 谭福利, 赵剑衡, 孙承纬 2017 高压 31 295Google Scholar
Luo B Q, Zhang H P, Chong T, Wang G J, Tan F L, Zhao J H, Sun C W 2017 Chin. J. High. Pressure Phys. 31 295Google Scholar
[17] Baer M R, Hobbs M L, Hall C A, Hooks D E, Gustavsen R L, Sheffield S A 2007 Shock Compression of Condensed Matter New York, United States, June 23 −29, 2007 p1165
[18] Munday Lynn B, Chung Peter W, Rice Betsy M, Solares Santiago D 2011 J. Phys. Chem. B 115 4378Google Scholar
[19] Ralph Menikoff, Dick J J, Hooks D E 2005 J. Appl. Phys. 97 023529Google Scholar
[20] 种涛, 王桂吉, 谭福利, 罗斌强, 张旭平, 吴刚, 赵剑衡 2014 中国科学: 物理学 力学 天文学 44 630Google Scholar
Chong T, Wang G J, Tan F L, Luo B Q, Zhang X P, Wu G, Zhao J H 2014 Sci. Sin-Phys. Mech Astron 44 630Google Scholar
-
表 1 实验条件
Table 1. Experimental condition.
实验发次 样品晶向 样品厚度/mm 充电电压/kV Shot-1 RDX(210) 0.763 70 0.697 Shot-2 RDX(100) 0.835 70 0.746 表 2 数值模拟的模型参数
Table 2. Parameters for numerical simulation.
晶向 形核时间/ns n 屈服强度/GPa Kξ/GPa $K_\xi '$ Remarks (210) 60 1.3 0.5 10.10 8.20 α 9.56 5.03 γ (100) 60 1.3 0.7 13.00 10.20 α 10.56 8.53 γ -
[1] Hall C A, Asay J R, Knudson M D, Stygar W A, Spielman R B, Pointon T D 2001 Rev. Sci. Instrum. 72 3587Google Scholar
[2] Hare D E, Forbes J W, Reisman D B 2004 Appl. Phys. Lett. 85 949Google Scholar
[3] Hare D E, Reisman D B, Garcia F, Green L G, Forbes J W, Furnish M D, Hall C, Hickman J W 2004 AIP Conference Proceedings 706 145Google Scholar
[4] Hare D E, Reisman D B, Dick J J 2004 UCRL-JRNL-202601
[5] Baer M R, Root S, Dattelbaum D Hooks D E, Gustavsen R L, Orler B, Pierce T, Garcia F, Vandersall K, DeFisher S, Travers B 2009 AIP Conference Proceedings 706 699
[6] Baer M R, Hall C A, Gustavsen R L 2007 J. Appl. Phys. 101 034906Google Scholar
[7] Ricardo I C, Leonardo C P, Samuel P H 2010 J. Mol. Struct. 970 51Google Scholar
[8] Dreger Z A, Gupta Y M 2007 J. Phys. Chem. B. 111 3893Google Scholar
[9] Goto N, Fujihisa H, Yamawaki H, Wakabayashi K, Nakayama Y, Yoshida M, Koshi M 2006 J. Phys. Chem. B. 110 23655Google Scholar
[10] Patterson J E, Dreger Z A, Gupta Y M 2007 J. Phys. Chem. B 111 10897Google Scholar
[11] Cawkwell M J, Ramos K J, Hooks D E, Sewell T D 2010 J. Appl. Phys. 107 063512Google Scholar
[12] Ramos K J, Hooks D E, Sewell T D, Cawkwell M J 2010 J. Appl. Phys. 108 066105Google Scholar
[13] Cawkwell M J, Sewell T D, Zheng L, Thompson D L 2008 Phys. Rev. B. 78 014107Google Scholar
[14] Hooks D E, Ramos K J, Martinez A R 2006 J. Appl. Phys. 100 024908Google Scholar
[15] Wang G J, Luo B Q, Zhang X P, Zhao J H, Sun C W, Tan F L, Chong T, Mo J J, Wu G, TaO Y H 2013 Rev. Sci. Instrum. 84 015117Google Scholar
[16] 罗斌强, 张红平, 种涛, 王桂吉, 谭福利, 赵剑衡, 孙承纬 2017 高压 31 295Google Scholar
Luo B Q, Zhang H P, Chong T, Wang G J, Tan F L, Zhao J H, Sun C W 2017 Chin. J. High. Pressure Phys. 31 295Google Scholar
[17] Baer M R, Hobbs M L, Hall C A, Hooks D E, Gustavsen R L, Sheffield S A 2007 Shock Compression of Condensed Matter New York, United States, June 23 −29, 2007 p1165
[18] Munday Lynn B, Chung Peter W, Rice Betsy M, Solares Santiago D 2011 J. Phys. Chem. B 115 4378Google Scholar
[19] Ralph Menikoff, Dick J J, Hooks D E 2005 J. Appl. Phys. 97 023529Google Scholar
[20] 种涛, 王桂吉, 谭福利, 罗斌强, 张旭平, 吴刚, 赵剑衡 2014 中国科学: 物理学 力学 天文学 44 630Google Scholar
Chong T, Wang G J, Tan F L, Luo B Q, Zhang X P, Wu G, Zhao J H 2014 Sci. Sin-Phys. Mech Astron 44 630Google Scholar
Catalog
Metrics
- Abstract views: 5159
- PDF Downloads: 65
- Cited By: 0