-
以飞行器再入大气层时面临的通信“黑障”问题为研究背景, 考虑粒子动力学效应, 采用温等离子体介电常数模型, 理论分析了各向同性等离子体覆盖圆柱金属天线构型中角向对称电磁模式的色散特性、传播特性及辐射特性. 研究结果表明: 在低气压、电磁波频率 ω/(2π) = 1 GHz 参量条件下, 界于金属天线表面和主等离子体层之间的鞘层厚度约为几个德拜长度; 角向对称模在天线表面的传播属于快波(波的相速大于光速)辐射, 且存在一个临界等离子体密度, 超过此临界值电磁波变为消逝波; 存在一个临界归一化鞘层厚度(ι/λDe)pha (或(ι/λDe)att), 超过此临界值时, 相位常数(或衰减常数)幅值开始陡升(或陡降), 即波的传播特性发生显著改变; 当金属天线半径为3倍等离子体趋肤深度、鞘层厚度为整个等离子体层厚度的0.1倍时, 电场和功率出现“椭圆形轮廓”辐射增强现象, 其可能是由等离子体频率共振和等离子体-鞘层-天线系统阻抗共振引起, 这些结论为相控阵天线的高分辨率成像等问题提供了理论思路.The blackout problem suffered by hypersonic vehicles as they re-enter the atmosphere is essential for effective communication of hypersonic vehicles. Aiming to solve this problem, in this paper, we proposed an antenna–sheath–plasma layer configuration, in which a thin plasma layer covered cylindrical metal antenna model is employed to investigate the radiation enhancement phenomenon by solving the dispersion equation of electromagnetic mode under optimized parameter conditions. Analytical results show that when the neutral gas pressure is low (p = 0.5 mTorr) and the antenna radius is triple the plasma skin depth, the thickness of the sheath between the surface of metal cylindrical antenna and plasma layer is about several Debye lengths, the azimuthally symmetric wave (m = 0 mode) that propagates along the antenna surface belongs to the fast wave (the phase velocity is greater than the light speed), there exists a critical plasma frequency ωpe (or plasma density n0), above which the propagating mode becomes evanescent wave; for the propagation characteristic, there exists a critical normalized sheath thickness (ι/λDe)pha (or (ι/λDe)att), above which the phase constant (or the attenuation constant) begins to increase (or decrease) sharply, which indicates a significant change in the propagation property of the propagating mode; most importantly, when the wave frequency ω/2π = 1 GHz, sheath thickness is one tenth of the whole plasma layer thickness, owing to the electron plasma frequency resonance and antenna-sheath-plasma resonance effect, the maximum radiation intensity of the symmetric wave exhibits an elliptical-like profile near ωpe/ω = 1 and ωpe/ω ≈ 1.33, respectively, while only a single-point radiation enhancement occurs at frequencies far from GHz range. These conclusions not only provide a method to solve or alleviate the blackout problem of GHz frequency communication faced by the hypersonic vehicles when they re-enter the atmosphere, but also have potential applications in high-resolution imaging induced by plasmonic micro-nano sized enhanced radiation and high-resolution phased array antennas.
-
Keywords:
- plasma /
- sheath /
- electromagnetic wave radiation /
- dispersion relation
[1] Kumar N, Vadera S R 2017 Aerospace Materials and Material Technologies (Singapore: Springer) p519
[2] Ananth P B, Abhiram N, Krishna K H, et al. 2021 Mater. Today Proc. 47 4872Google Scholar
[3] Ghayekhloo A, Abdolali A, Armaki S H M 2017 IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 65 3058Google Scholar
[4] Dong B, Ma Y, Ren Z, et al. 2020 J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 53 213001Google Scholar
[5] Koya A N, Cunha J, Guerrero-Becerra K A, Garoli D, Wang T, Juodkazis S, Zaccaria R P 2021 Adv. Funct. Mater. 31 2103706Google Scholar
[6] 李盼 2019 68 146201Google Scholar
Li P 2019 Acta Phys. Sin. 68 146201Google Scholar
[7] 陆云清, 呼斯楞, 陆懿, 许吉, 王瑾 2015 64 077303Google Scholar
Lu Y Q, Hu S L, Lu Y, Xu J, Wang J 2015 Acta Phys. Sin. 64 077303Google Scholar
[8] Webb B A, Ziolkowski R W 2020 Photonics 7 88Google Scholar
[9] Kim M, Boyd I D, Keidar M 2010 J. Spacecr. Rockets 47 29Google Scholar
[10] Pinder D N 1965 Electron. Lett. 10 291Google Scholar
[11] Messiaen A M, Vandenplas P E 1967 Electron. Lett. 1 26Google Scholar
[12] Lin C C, Chen K M 1970 IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 18 831Google Scholar
[13] Freeman E M, Lin C C, Chen K M 1971 Proc. Inst. Electr. Eng. 118 1748Google Scholar
[14] Gao X T, Wang C S, Jiang B, Zhang Z L 2014 Phys. Plasmas 21 093301Google Scholar
[15] Wang C S, Li X, Jiang B 2015 Appl. Phys. Lett. 106 102901Google Scholar
[16] Mouzouris Y, Scharer J E 1998 Phys. Plasmas 5 4253Google Scholar
[17] Virko V F, Kirichenko G S, Shamrai K P 2002 Plasma Sources Sci. Technol. 11 10Google Scholar
[18] Niemi K, Krämer M 2008 Phys. Plasmas 15 073503Google Scholar
[19] Shamrai K P, Shinohara S 2001 Phys. Plasmas 8 4659Google Scholar
[20] Huba J D 2016 NRL Plasma Formulary (Washington: Naval Research Laboratory) p34
[21] Fried B D, Conte S D 2015 The Plasma Dispersion Function: The Hilbert Transform of the Gaussian (New York: Academic Press) p1
[22] Glaude V M M, Moisan M, Pantel R, Leprince P, Marec J 1980 J. Appl. Phys. 51 5693Google Scholar
[23] Jackson J D 1999 Classical Electrodynamics (New York: John Wiley & Sons) p176
[24] Swanson D G 1989 Plasma Waves (New York: Academic Press) p155
[25] Stix T H 1992 Waves in Plasmas (New York: Springer Verlag) p72
[26] Chen F F, Arnush D 2001 Phys. Plasmas 8 5051Google Scholar
-
图 3 ω/(2π) = 1 GHz,
${T_{\text{e}}} = 3{\text{ eV}}$ ,$p = 0.5{\text{ mTorr}}$ ,$a = $ $ 3\max \{ {\delta _{{\text{pe}}}}\}$ 时, 相位常数和衰减常数与归一化等离子体频率的依赖关系Fig. 3. Phase and attenuation constant versus electron temperature for wave frequency ω/(2π) = 1 GHz,
${T_{\text{e}}} = 3{\text{ eV}}$ ,$p = 0.5{\text{ mTorr}}$ ,$a = 3\max \{ {\delta _{{\text{pe}}}}\} $ .图 5
$\omega /(2{\text{π }}) = 3{\text{ GHz}}$ ,${\omega _{{\text{pe}}}} = 3\omega $ ,$p = 0.5{\text{ mTorr}}$ ,$a = 3{\delta _{{\text{pe}}}}$ 时, 电磁波在主等离子体区域的功率损耗随归一化相速的变化关系Fig. 5. Power loss of electromagnetic waves in the main plasma region vs. the normalized phase velocity at
$\omega /(2{\text{π }}) = $ $ 3{\text{ GHz}}$ ,${\omega _{{\text{pe}}}} = 3\omega $ ,$p = 0.5{\text{ mTorr}}$ ,$a = 3{\delta _{{\text{pe}}}}$ . -
[1] Kumar N, Vadera S R 2017 Aerospace Materials and Material Technologies (Singapore: Springer) p519
[2] Ananth P B, Abhiram N, Krishna K H, et al. 2021 Mater. Today Proc. 47 4872Google Scholar
[3] Ghayekhloo A, Abdolali A, Armaki S H M 2017 IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 65 3058Google Scholar
[4] Dong B, Ma Y, Ren Z, et al. 2020 J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 53 213001Google Scholar
[5] Koya A N, Cunha J, Guerrero-Becerra K A, Garoli D, Wang T, Juodkazis S, Zaccaria R P 2021 Adv. Funct. Mater. 31 2103706Google Scholar
[6] 李盼 2019 68 146201Google Scholar
Li P 2019 Acta Phys. Sin. 68 146201Google Scholar
[7] 陆云清, 呼斯楞, 陆懿, 许吉, 王瑾 2015 64 077303Google Scholar
Lu Y Q, Hu S L, Lu Y, Xu J, Wang J 2015 Acta Phys. Sin. 64 077303Google Scholar
[8] Webb B A, Ziolkowski R W 2020 Photonics 7 88Google Scholar
[9] Kim M, Boyd I D, Keidar M 2010 J. Spacecr. Rockets 47 29Google Scholar
[10] Pinder D N 1965 Electron. Lett. 10 291Google Scholar
[11] Messiaen A M, Vandenplas P E 1967 Electron. Lett. 1 26Google Scholar
[12] Lin C C, Chen K M 1970 IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 18 831Google Scholar
[13] Freeman E M, Lin C C, Chen K M 1971 Proc. Inst. Electr. Eng. 118 1748Google Scholar
[14] Gao X T, Wang C S, Jiang B, Zhang Z L 2014 Phys. Plasmas 21 093301Google Scholar
[15] Wang C S, Li X, Jiang B 2015 Appl. Phys. Lett. 106 102901Google Scholar
[16] Mouzouris Y, Scharer J E 1998 Phys. Plasmas 5 4253Google Scholar
[17] Virko V F, Kirichenko G S, Shamrai K P 2002 Plasma Sources Sci. Technol. 11 10Google Scholar
[18] Niemi K, Krämer M 2008 Phys. Plasmas 15 073503Google Scholar
[19] Shamrai K P, Shinohara S 2001 Phys. Plasmas 8 4659Google Scholar
[20] Huba J D 2016 NRL Plasma Formulary (Washington: Naval Research Laboratory) p34
[21] Fried B D, Conte S D 2015 The Plasma Dispersion Function: The Hilbert Transform of the Gaussian (New York: Academic Press) p1
[22] Glaude V M M, Moisan M, Pantel R, Leprince P, Marec J 1980 J. Appl. Phys. 51 5693Google Scholar
[23] Jackson J D 1999 Classical Electrodynamics (New York: John Wiley & Sons) p176
[24] Swanson D G 1989 Plasma Waves (New York: Academic Press) p155
[25] Stix T H 1992 Waves in Plasmas (New York: Springer Verlag) p72
[26] Chen F F, Arnush D 2001 Phys. Plasmas 8 5051Google Scholar
计量
- 文章访问数: 2786
- PDF下载量: 79
- 被引次数: 0